B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 65,65 A12 Eliane de Ceuninck -Annie Legrand
--- 2 58,95 A.2 Jean de Villenfagne -Hedwig Fiems
--- 3 53,30 A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Michele Berrier
--- 4 52,89 A.7 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
--- 5 52,08 A.8 Philippe van der Gracht -Tina Katila
--- 6 49,63 A11 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten
--- 7 48,64 A.9 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx
--- 8 48,30 A.1 Annette Fobe -Sophie Tilemans
--- 9 47,07 A10 Brigitte Velge -Francoise Turin
--- 10 45,41 A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary
--- 11 40,68 A.3 Patricia Bardy -Jeanine Bontemps
--- 12 39,52 A.6 Lydia Luyten -Claire Derieuw
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 63,04 a.2 Francoise Duren -Lydia Wildiers
--- 2 57,44 a.8 Christiane de le Court -François Regis Lamy
--- 3 54,49 a11 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant
--- 4 54,20 a.1 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor
--- 5 48,81 a.6 Veronique de Beaufort -Nathalie de Laminne
--- 6 48,60 a12 Jacqueline de Thier -Sylviane Delbeke
--- 7 48,24 a.5 Antoinette Jourdain -Dominique Sassen
--- 8 47,98 a.4 Daniel Malarme -Denise Pel
--- 9 45,48 a.3 Didier Collart -Thierry Collart
--- 10 41,22 a10 Caroll Pucher -Marie J. de Wagheneire
--- 11 40,51 a.7 Sybille Gillet -Caroline Lallia
--- 12 0,00 a.9 -
PAIRE A12 Eliane de Ceuninck -Annie Legrand
a11 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 54,49 %
1 NS 2P E = -110 0.1 0.71
2 NS 2C E+3 -200 11.6 82.86
3 NS 3S W+1 -630 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 36,43 %
a10 Caroll Pucher -Marie J. de Wagheneire 41,22 %
4 NS 1S N+5 240 12 85.71
5 NS 5P E-1 50 14 100.00
6 NS 5K E-2 200 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 92,86 %
a.9 - 0,00 %
7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.8 Christiane de le Court -François Regis Lamy 57,44 %
10 NS 5P W+2 -710 8 57.14
11 NS 4C W-2 100 11 78.57
12 NS 3S N = 600 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
a.7 Sybille Gillet -Caroline Lallia 40,51 %
13 NS 2C W+2 -170 5.9 42.14
14 NS 4K E+1 -150 11.6 82.86
15 NS 4C N+1 650 12.7 90.71 µ Tbl = 71,90 %
a.5 Antoinette Jourdain -Dominique Sassen 48,24 %
16 NS 3S N+1 430 10 71.43
17 NS 3S W = -400 8 57.14
18 NS 3S E-2 100 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.4 Daniel Malarme -Denise Pel 47,98 %
19 NS 5KcN-1 -100 10.4 74.29
20 NS 2P N+1 140 9.3 66.43
21 NS 4C S+1 650 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 58,10 %
a12 Jacqueline de Thier -Sylviane Delbeke 48,60 %
34 NS 2K S = 90 9.3 66.43
35 NS 4P W-2 200 12.7 90.71
36 NS 1S N-1 -100 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 71,67 %
Total : 193,0 / 294 = 65,65 %
PAIRE A.2 Jean de Villenfagne -Hedwig Fiems
a.2 Francoise Duren -Lydia Wildiers 63,04 %
4 NS 1C S+3 170 10 71.43
5 NS 5CcW = -650 0 0.00
6 NS 4K E-1 100 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
a.1 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 54,20 %
7 NS 5T S-2 -200 9.3 66.43
8 NS 2P S-1 -50 5.9 42.14
9 NS 2P S+1 140 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 69,29 %
a12 Jacqueline de Thier -Sylviane Delbeke 48,60 %
10 NS 4P W+3 -710 8 57.14
11 NS 4K S-2 -100 2 14.29
12 NS 3S S = 600 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
a11 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 54,49 %
13 NS 2C W+2 -170 5.9 42.14
14 NS 3S W+3 -490 4.7 33.57
15 NS 5C N = 650 12.7 90.71 µ Tbl = 55,48 %
a10 Caroll Pucher -Marie J. de Wagheneire 41,22 %
16 NS 3S N = 400 3 21.43
17 NS 3S W = -400 8 57.14
18 NS 3S E-2 100 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.9 - 0,00 %
19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00
21 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.7 Sybille Gillet -Caroline Lallia 40,51 %
22 NS 4P N+2 480 13 92.86
23 NS 4C S = 620 13 92.86
24 NS 3C N = 140 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 90,48 %
a.6 Veronique de Beaufort -Nathalie de Laminne 48,81 %
25 NS 4P E-1 100 10.4 74.29
26 NS 3T S = 110 11.6 82.86
27 NS 4K W-2 100 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 66,43 %
Total : 173,3 / 294 = 58,95 %
PAIRE A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Michele Berrier
a.5 Antoinette Jourdain -Dominique Sassen 48,24 %
13 NS 3K E = -110 13.9 99.29
14 NS 3S W+2 -460 7 50.00
15 NS 6C S-3 -300 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 55,48 %
a.4 Daniel Malarme -Denise Pel 47,98 %
16 NS 3S N+1 430 10 71.43
17 NS 3S W+2 -460 1 7.14
18 NS 4T W+1 -150 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Thierry Collart 45,48 %
19 NS 4C N-2 -100 10.4 74.29
20 NS 2P S+1 140 9.3 66.43
21 NS 4C S+1 650 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 58,10 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Lydia Wildiers 63,04 %
22 NS 4P N+1 450 9 64.29
23 NS 4C S-1 -100 2 14.29
24 NS 2C N = 110 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
a.1 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 54,20 %
25 NS 4P E-1 100 10.4 74.29
26 NS 3P S = 140 13.9 99.29
27 NS 4K W-2 100 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 71,90 %
a12 Jacqueline de Thier -Sylviane Delbeke 48,60 %
28 NS 6K S-1 -100 8.1 57.86
29 NS 3S E+2 -660 8.1 57.86
30 NS 2TcS-1 -100 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 52,62 %
a10 Caroll Pucher -Marie J. de Wagheneire 41,22 %
31 NS 2P E-1 50 8.1 57.86
32 NS 3S N = 400 9.3 66.43
33 NS 3P N = 140 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 63,57 %
a.9 - 0,00 %
34 NS BYE 0 0.00
35 NS BYE 0 0.00
36 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 156,7 / 294 = 53,30 %
PAIRE A.7 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
a12 Jacqueline de Thier -Sylviane Delbeke 48,60 %
1 NS 2S N+1 150 11.6 82.86
2 NS 4C E+1 -450 4.7 33.57
3 NS 3S W = -600 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 60,95 %
a11 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 54,49 %
4 NS 2K S+3 150 6 42.86
5 NS 5P E = -450 8 57.14
6 NS 3K W = -110 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
a.7 Sybille Gillet -Caroline Lallia 40,51 %
19 NS 4C N-3 -150 4.7 33.57
20 NS 1P N+2 140 9.3 66.43
21 NS 3S N+2 660 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 60,95 %
a.6 Veronique de Beaufort -Nathalie de Laminne 48,81 %
22 NS 2P N+3 200 2 14.29
23 NS 4C S = 620 13 92.86
24 NS 2C N = 110 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
a.5 Antoinette Jourdain -Dominique Sassen 48,24 %
25 NS 3P E = -140 4.7 33.57
26 NS 2C W-1 100 8.1 57.86
27 NS 3P S = 140 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 52,62 %
a.4 Daniel Malarme -Denise Pel 47,98 %
28 NS 6K S-1 -100 8.1 57.86
29 NS 3S E+3 -690 2.4 17.14
30 NS 2S N-1 -50 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 49,76 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Thierry Collart 45,48 %
31 NS 3P E-1 50 8.1 57.86
32 NS 3S N = 400 9.3 66.43
33 NS 1P N+3 170 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 74,52 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Lydia Wildiers 63,04 %
34 NS 2C E+2 -170 2.4 17.14
35 NS 2P W+1 -140 4.7 33.57
36 NS 1S N-1 -100 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 36,19 %
Total : 177,7 / 336 = 52,89 %
PAIRE A.8 Philippe van der Gracht -Tina Katila
a.3 Didier Collart -Thierry Collart 45,48 %
1 NS 3P E-1 50 7 50.00
2 NS 4C E+2 -480 0.1 0.71
3 NS 3S W = -600 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 39,05 %
a.1 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 54,20 %
4 NS 3K S+2 150 6 42.86
5 NS 5KcN-1 -200 11 78.57
6 NS 4K W-1 100 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
a12 Jacqueline de Thier -Sylviane Delbeke 48,60 %
7 NS 4C E+1 -650 2.4 17.14
8 NS 3T E-1 50 11.6 82.86
9 NS 2P S-1 -50 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 47,38 %
a.8 Christiane de le Court -François Regis Lamy 57,44 %
22 NS 4P N+1 450 9 64.29
23 NS 3S S-1 -100 2 14.29
24 NS 2S W-3 150 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
a.7 Sybille Gillet -Caroline Lallia 40,51 %
25 NS 3P E-1 100 10.4 74.29
26 NS 2C W-1 100 8.1 57.86
27 NS 3P S-1 -50 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 44,29 %
a.6 Veronique de Beaufort -Nathalie de Laminne 48,81 %
28 NS 5K S+1 620 13.9 99.29
29 NS 3S E+3 -690 2.4 17.14
30 NS 2T S = 90 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 71,90 %
a.5 Antoinette Jourdain -Dominique Sassen 48,24 %
31 NS 3P E-2 100 11.6 82.86
32 NS 3S N-1 -50 1.3 9.29
33 NS 2K N = 90 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 41,90 %
a.4 Daniel Malarme -Denise Pel 47,98 %
34 NS 3KcS-1 -200 0.1 0.71
35 NS 1S N+1 120 9.3 66.43
36 NS 1S N = 90 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 55,48 %
Total : 175,0 / 336 = 52,08 %
PAIRE A11 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten
a.9 - 0,00 %
1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.8 Christiane de le Court -François Regis Lamy 57,44 %
4 NS 1S N+1 120 2 14.29
5 NS 5P E+1 -480 5 35.71
6 NS 3K W = -110 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 19,05 %
a.7 Sybille Gillet -Caroline Lallia 40,51 %
7 NS 3P E+1 -170 12.7 90.71
8 NS 2P S-1 -50 5.9 42.14
9 NS 2P S-1 -50 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
a.6 Veronique de Beaufort -Nathalie de Laminne 48,81 %
10 NS 4P W+3 -710 8 57.14
11 NS 3P E-1 50 6 42.86
12 NS 1S N+2 150 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
a.4 Daniel Malarme -Denise Pel 47,98 %
13 NS 2C W+2 -170 5.9 42.14
14 NS 2C W+2 -170 9.3 66.43
15 NS 6S S-1 -100 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,86 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Thierry Collart 45,48 %
16 NS 3S N+3 490 14 100.00
17 NS 3S W = -400 8 57.14
18 NS 3S E-2 100 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
a11 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 54,49 %
31 NS 1S N+1 120 13.9 99.29
32 NS 3S N = 400 9.3 66.43
33 NS 2P N+1 140 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 77,38 %
a10 Caroll Pucher -Marie J. de Wagheneire 41,22 %
34 NS 1S S = 90 9.3 66.43
35 NS 4C E = -620 1.3 9.29
36 NS 2K N-2 -200 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 25,48 %
Total : 145,9 / 294 = 49,63 %
PAIRE A.9 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx
a.5 Antoinette Jourdain -Dominique Sassen 48,24 %
1 NS 2P E-1 50 7 50.00
2 NS 4C E = -420 9.3 66.43
3 NS 3S W+1 -630 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 47,38 %
a.4 Daniel Malarme -Denise Pel 47,98 %
4 NS 3S N+1 630 14 100.00
5 NS 5KcN-1 -200 11 78.57
6 NS 3S W-1 100 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Lydia Wildiers 63,04 %
7 NS 4C W+1 -650 2.4 17.14
8 NS 3P N-1 -50 5.9 42.14
9 NS 2P S-2 -100 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 20,00 %
a.1 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 54,20 %
10 NS 4P W+3 -710 8 57.14
11 NS 4C W-1 50 6 42.86
12 NS 3S S = 600 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.9 - 0,00 %
25 NS BYE 0 0.00
26 NS BYE 0 0.00
27 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.8 Christiane de le Court -François Regis Lamy 57,44 %
28 NS 5K N-1 -100 8.1 57.86
29 NS 3S E+2 -660 8.1 57.86
30 NS 4P E = -420 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 38,81 %
a.7 Sybille Gillet -Caroline Lallia 40,51 %
31 NS 2P E = -110 2.4 17.14
32 NS 3S N = 400 9.3 66.43
33 NS 1P N+2 140 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.6 Veronique de Beaufort -Nathalie de Laminne 48,81 %
34 NS 1S S = 90 9.3 66.43
35 NS 5KcE-1 200 12.7 90.71
36 NS 2C E = -110 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 58,10 %
Total : 143,0 / 294 = 48,64 %
PAIRE A.1 Annette Fobe -Sophie Tilemans
a.1 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 54,20 %
1 NS 2P E-1 50 7 50.00
2 NS 4C E+1 -450 4.7 33.57
3 NS 3S W+2 -660 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 28,10 %
a12 Jacqueline de Thier -Sylviane Delbeke 48,60 %
4 NS 3K S+2 150 6 42.86
5 NS 4C W+2 -480 5 35.71
6 NS 3K W-1 100 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
a11 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 54,49 %
7 NS 3P E+1 -170 12.7 90.71
8 NS 3T W = -110 0.1 0.71
9 NS 2P S-1 -50 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 44,52 %
a10 Caroll Pucher -Marie J. de Wagheneire 41,22 %
10 NS 4P W+3 -710 8 57.14
11 NS 4C W-2 100 11 78.57
12 NS 3S S+1 630 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
a.9 - 0,00 %
13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.8 Christiane de le Court -François Regis Lamy 57,44 %
16 NS 3S N = 400 3 21.43
17 NS 3S W = -400 8 57.14
18 NS 3P S-1 -100 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
a.6 Veronique de Beaufort -Nathalie de Laminne 48,81 %
19 NS 4C N-2 -100 10.4 74.29
20 NS 2C W-1 100 2.4 17.14
21 NS 4C S+1 650 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
a.5 Antoinette Jourdain -Dominique Sassen 48,24 %
22 NS 4P N+2 480 13 92.86
23 NS 2C N+1 140 9 64.29
24 NS 2C N = 110 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
Total : 142,0 / 294 = 48,30 %
PAIRE A10 Brigitte Velge -Francoise Turin
a.7 Sybille Gillet -Caroline Lallia 40,51 %
1 NS 3T N-2 -100 2.4 17.14
2 NS 2K W+2 -130 13.9 99.29
3 NS 3S W = -600 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 60,95 %
a.6 Veronique de Beaufort -Nathalie de Laminne 48,81 %
4 NS 2K S+1 110 0 0.00
5 NS 6KcN-2 -500 2 14.29
6 NS 5K W-2 200 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
a.5 Antoinette Jourdain -Dominique Sassen 48,24 %
7 NS 4C W+1 -650 2.4 17.14
8 NS 2P S-1 -50 5.9 42.14
9 NS 2P S = 110 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 47,38 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Thierry Collart 45,48 %
10 NS 4P W+3 -710 8 57.14
11 NS 5KcS-2 -300 0 0.00
12 NS 3T N = 110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 19,05 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Lydia Wildiers 63,04 %
13 NS 2C W+2 -170 5.9 42.14
14 NS 3TcS-4 -800 0.1 0.71
15 NS 3S N = 600 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 36,43 %
a10 Caroll Pucher -Marie J. de Wagheneire 41,22 %
28 NS 6K N-2 -200 1.3 9.29
29 NS 3S E = -600 13.9 99.29
30 NS 2T S-1 -50 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 60,95 %
a.9 - 0,00 %
31 NS BYE 0 0.00
32 NS BYE 0 0.00
33 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.8 Christiane de le Court -François Regis Lamy 57,44 %
34 NS 2S W-2 100 13.9 99.29
35 NS 5K S-1 -50 7 50.00
36 NS 1S N-1 -100 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
Total : 138,4 / 294 = 47,07 %
PAIRE A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary
a.4 Daniel Malarme -Denise Pel 47,98 %
10 NS 6P W+1 -1460 0 0.00
11 NS 4CcW-2 300 14 100.00
12 NS 3S N+1 630 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Thierry Collart 45,48 %
13 NS 3C W+1 -170 5.9 42.14
14 NS 3P E = -140 13.9 99.29
15 NS 6S S-3 -300 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 52,86 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Lydia Wildiers 63,04 %
16 NS 3S N = 400 3 21.43
17 NS 3S W+2 -460 1 7.14
18 NS 3S E-2 100 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.1 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 54,20 %
19 NS 5KcN-1 -100 10.4 74.29
20 NS 2C W = -110 0.1 0.71
21 NS 3S N+3 690 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 58,10 %
a12 Jacqueline de Thier -Sylviane Delbeke 48,60 %
22 NS 2P N+5 260 4 28.57
23 NS 4P S-1 -100 2 14.29
24 NS 2C N = 110 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
a11 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 54,49 %
25 NS 4P E+1 -650 0.1 0.71
26 NS 2P W = -110 3.6 25.71
27 NS 4KcW-2 300 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 41,90 %
a.9 - 0,00 %
28 NS BYE 0 0.00
29 NS BYE 0 0.00
30 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.8 Christiane de le Court -François Regis Lamy 57,44 %
31 NS 4T N-1 -100 4.7 33.57
32 NS 3S N = 400 9.3 66.43
33 NS 3P N-1 -50 1.3 9.29 µ Tbl = 36,43 %
Total : 133,5 / 294 = 45,41 %
PAIRE A.3 Patricia Bardy -Jeanine Bontemps
a.3 Didier Collart -Thierry Collart 45,48 %
7 NS 4C W = -620 7 50.00
8 NS 2P S = 110 13.9 99.29
9 NS 2P S-1 -50 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 63,81 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Lydia Wildiers 63,04 %
10 NS 4P W+3 -710 8 57.14
11 NS 4P E-1 50 6 42.86
12 NS 3S N = 600 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.1 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 54,20 %
13 NS 2C W+2 -170 5.9 42.14
14 NS 3S W+4 -520 2.4 17.14
15 NS 6S S-3 -300 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 25,48 %
a12 Jacqueline de Thier -Sylviane Delbeke 48,60 %
16 NS 3S N = 400 3 21.43
17 NS 2S W+2 -180 14 100.00
18 NS 3S E-2 100 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
a11 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 54,49 %
19 NS 4CcS-3 -500 2.4 17.14
20 NS 2P N+1 140 9.3 66.43
21 NS 4C S+1 650 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 39,05 %
a10 Caroll Pucher -Marie J. de Wagheneire 41,22 %
22 NS 3P N+1 170 0 0.00
23 NS 1P S+2 140 9 64.29
24 NS 2C N-1 -50 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
a.8 Christiane de le Court -François Regis Lamy 57,44 %
25 NS 4P E = -620 2.4 17.14
26 NS 2C W = -110 3.6 25.71
27 NS 3K E-1 50 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 20,00 %
a.7 Sybille Gillet -Caroline Lallia 40,51 %
28 NS 5K S-1 -100 8.1 57.86
29 NS 3S W+3 -690 2.4 17.14
30 NS 3T S-2 -100 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 39,05 %
Total : 136,7 / 336 = 40,68 %
PAIRE A.6 Lydia Luyten -Claire Derieuw
a10 Caroll Pucher -Marie J. de Wagheneire 41,22 %
1 NS 3ScE-3 500 13.9 99.29
2 NS 4C E+1 -450 4.7 33.57
3 NS 4T W = -130 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 77,38 %
a.6 Veronique de Beaufort -Nathalie de Laminne 48,81 %
16 NS 3S N+1 430 10 71.43
17 NS 3S W = -400 8 57.14
18 NS 3T E+2 -150 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
a.5 Antoinette Jourdain -Dominique Sassen 48,24 %
19 NS 4PcW = -790 0.1 0.71
20 NS 2P S+1 140 9.3 66.43
21 NS 4C S+1 650 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 33,57 %
a.4 Daniel Malarme -Denise Pel 47,98 %
22 NS 4P N = 420 6 42.86
23 NS 1P S+1 110 6 42.86
24 NS 2C N-1 -50 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Thierry Collart 45,48 %
25 NS 4P E-1 100 10.4 74.29
26 NS 2C W+1 -140 0.1 0.71
27 NS 5K W-4 200 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 52,62 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Lydia Wildiers 63,04 %
28 NS 6K S-2 -200 1.3 9.29
29 NS 3S E+1 -630 11.6 82.86
30 NS 3TcS-2 -300 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 36,43 %
a.1 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 54,20 %
31 NS 3K N-2 -200 0.1 0.71
32 NS 3S N-1 -50 1.3 9.29
33 NS 4P N-1 -50 1.3 9.29 µ Tbl = 6,43 %
a11 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 54,49 %
34 NS 3T E+1 -130 4.7 33.57
35 NS 4C E = -620 1.3 9.29
36 NS 1S N-1 -100 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 33,57 %
Total : 132,8 / 336 = 39,52 %
PAIRE a.2 Francoise Duren -Lydia Wildiers
A.2 Jean de Villenfagne -Hedwig Fiems 58,95 %
4 EO 1C S+3 170 4 28.57
5 EO 5CcW = -650 14 100.00
6 EO 4K E-1 100 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
A.9 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 48,64 %
7 EO 4C W+1 -650 11.6 82.86
8 EO 3P N-1 -50 8.1 57.86
9 EO 2P S-2 -100 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 80,00 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Jeanine Bontemps 40,68 %
10 EO 4P W+3 -710 6 42.86
11 EO 4P E-1 50 8 57.14
12 EO 3S N = 600 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A10 Brigitte Velge -Francoise Turin 47,07 %
13 EO 2C W+2 -170 8.1 57.86
14 EO 3TcS-4 -800 13.9 99.29
15 EO 3S N = 600 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 63,57 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary 45,41 %
16 EO 3S N = 400 11 78.57
17 EO 3S W+2 -460 13 92.86
18 EO 3S E-2 100 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Michele Berrier 53,30 %
22 EO 4P N+1 450 5 35.71
23 EO 4C S-1 -100 12 85.71
24 EO 2C N = 110 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
A.6 Lydia Luyten -Claire Derieuw 39,52 %
28 EO 6K S-2 -200 12.7 90.71
29 EO 3S E+1 -630 2.4 17.14
30 EO 3TcS-2 -300 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 63,57 %
A.7 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,89 %
34 EO 2C E+2 -170 11.6 82.86
35 EO 2P W+1 -140 9.3 66.43
36 EO 1S N-1 -100 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 63,81 %
Total : 211,8 / 336 = 63,04 %
PAIRE a.8 Christiane de le Court -François Regis Lamy
A11 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 49,63 %
4 EO 1S N+1 120 12 85.71
5 EO 5P E+1 -480 9 64.29
6 EO 3K W = -110 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 80,95 %
A12 Eliane de Ceuninck -Annie Legrand 65,65 %
10 EO 5P W+2 -710 6 42.86
11 EO 4C W-2 100 3 21.43
12 EO 3S N = 600 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
A.1 Annette Fobe -Sophie Tilemans 48,30 %
16 EO 3S N = 400 11 78.57
17 EO 3S W = -400 6 42.86
18 EO 3P S-1 -100 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
A.8 Philippe van der Gracht -Tina Katila 52,08 %
22 EO 4P N+1 450 5 35.71
23 EO 3S S-1 -100 12 85.71
24 EO 2S W-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Jeanine Bontemps 40,68 %
25 EO 4P E = -620 11.6 82.86
26 EO 2C W = -110 10.4 74.29
27 EO 3K E-1 50 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 80,00 %
A.9 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 48,64 %
28 EO 5K N-1 -100 5.9 42.14
29 EO 3S E+2 -660 5.9 42.14
30 EO 4P E = -420 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 61,19 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary 45,41 %
31 EO 4T N-1 -100 9.3 66.43
32 EO 3S N = 400 4.7 33.57
33 EO 3P N-1 -50 12.7 90.71 µ Tbl = 63,57 %
A10 Brigitte Velge -Francoise Turin 47,07 %
34 EO 2S W-2 100 0.1 0.71
35 EO 5K S-1 -50 7 50.00
36 EO 1S N-1 -100 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
Total : 193,0 / 336 = 57,44 %
PAIRE a11 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant
A12 Eliane de Ceuninck -Annie Legrand 65,65 %
1 EO 2P E = -110 13.9 99.29
2 EO 2C E+3 -200 2.4 17.14
3 EO 3S W+1 -630 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 63,57 %
A.7 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,89 %
4 EO 2K S+3 150 8 57.14
5 EO 5P E = -450 6 42.86
6 EO 3K W = -110 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
A.1 Annette Fobe -Sophie Tilemans 48,30 %
7 EO 3P E+1 -170 1.3 9.29
8 EO 3T W = -110 13.9 99.29
9 EO 2P S-1 -50 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 55,48 %
A.2 Jean de Villenfagne -Hedwig Fiems 58,95 %
13 EO 2C W+2 -170 8.1 57.86
14 EO 3S W+3 -490 9.3 66.43
15 EO 5C N = 650 1.3 9.29 µ Tbl = 44,52 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Jeanine Bontemps 40,68 %
19 EO 4CcS-3 -500 11.6 82.86
20 EO 2P N+1 140 4.7 33.57
21 EO 4C S+1 650 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 60,95 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary 45,41 %
25 EO 4P E+1 -650 13.9 99.29
26 EO 2P W = -110 10.4 74.29
27 EO 4KcW-2 300 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 58,10 %
A11 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 49,63 %
31 EO 1S N+1 120 0.1 0.71
32 EO 3S N = 400 4.7 33.57
33 EO 2P N+1 140 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 22,62 %
A.6 Lydia Luyten -Claire Derieuw 39,52 %
34 EO 3T E+1 -130 9.3 66.43
35 EO 4C E = -620 12.7 90.71
36 EO 1S N-1 -100 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 66,43 %
Total : 183,1 / 336 = 54,49 %
PAIRE a.1 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor
A.1 Annette Fobe -Sophie Tilemans 48,30 %
1 EO 2P E-1 50 7 50.00
2 EO 4C E+1 -450 9.3 66.43
3 EO 3S W+2 -660 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 71,90 %
A.8 Philippe van der Gracht -Tina Katila 52,08 %
4 EO 3K S+2 150 8 57.14
5 EO 5KcN-1 -200 3 21.43
6 EO 4K W-1 100 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
A.2 Jean de Villenfagne -Hedwig Fiems 58,95 %
7 EO 5T S-2 -200 4.7 33.57
8 EO 2P S-1 -50 8.1 57.86
9 EO 2P S+1 140 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 30,71 %
A.9 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 48,64 %
10 EO 4P W+3 -710 6 42.86
11 EO 4C W-1 50 8 57.14
12 EO 3S S = 600 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Jeanine Bontemps 40,68 %
13 EO 2C W+2 -170 8.1 57.86
14 EO 3S W+4 -520 11.6 82.86
15 EO 6S S-3 -300 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 74,52 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary 45,41 %
19 EO 5KcN-1 -100 3.6 25.71
20 EO 2C W = -110 13.9 99.29
21 EO 3S N+3 690 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 41,90 %
A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Michele Berrier 53,30 %
25 EO 4P E-1 100 3.6 25.71
26 EO 3P S = 140 0.1 0.71
27 EO 4K W-2 100 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 28,10 %
A.6 Lydia Luyten -Claire Derieuw 39,52 %
31 EO 3K N-2 -200 13.9 99.29
32 EO 3S N-1 -50 12.7 90.71
33 EO 4P N-1 -50 12.7 90.71 µ Tbl = 93,57 %
Total : 182,1 / 336 = 54,20 %
PAIRE a.6 Veronique de Beaufort -Nathalie de Laminne
A10 Brigitte Velge -Francoise Turin 47,07 %
4 EO 2K S+1 110 14 100.00
5 EO 6KcN-2 -500 12 85.71
6 EO 5K W-2 200 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
A11 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 49,63 %
10 EO 4P W+3 -710 6 42.86
11 EO 3P E-1 50 8 57.14
12 EO 1S N+2 150 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
A.6 Lydia Luyten -Claire Derieuw 39,52 %
16 EO 3S N+1 430 4 28.57
17 EO 3S W = -400 6 42.86
18 EO 3T E+2 -150 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
A.1 Annette Fobe -Sophie Tilemans 48,30 %
19 EO 4C N-2 -100 3.6 25.71
20 EO 2C W-1 100 11.6 82.86
21 EO 4C S+1 650 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
A.7 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,89 %
22 EO 2P N+3 200 12 85.71
23 EO 4C S = 620 1 7.14
24 EO 2C N = 110 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A.2 Jean de Villenfagne -Hedwig Fiems 58,95 %
25 EO 4P E-1 100 3.6 25.71
26 EO 3T S = 110 2.4 17.14
27 EO 4K W-2 100 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 33,57 %
A.8 Philippe van der Gracht -Tina Katila 52,08 %
28 EO 5K S+1 620 0.1 0.71
29 EO 3S E+3 -690 11.6 82.86
30 EO 2T S = 90 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 28,10 %
A.9 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 48,64 %
34 EO 1S S = 90 4.7 33.57
35 EO 5KcE-1 200 1.3 9.29
36 EO 2C E = -110 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 41,90 %
Total : 164,0 / 336 = 48,81 %
PAIRE a12 Jacqueline de Thier -Sylviane Delbeke
A.7 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,89 %
1 EO 2S N+1 150 2.4 17.14
2 EO 4C E+1 -450 9.3 66.43
3 EO 3S W = -600 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 39,05 %
A.1 Annette Fobe -Sophie Tilemans 48,30 %
4 EO 3K S+2 150 8 57.14
5 EO 4C W+2 -480 9 64.29
6 EO 3K W-1 100 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
A.8 Philippe van der Gracht -Tina Katila 52,08 %
7 EO 4C E+1 -650 11.6 82.86
8 EO 3T E-1 50 2.4 17.14
9 EO 2P S-1 -50 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 52,62 %
A.2 Jean de Villenfagne -Hedwig Fiems 58,95 %
10 EO 4P W+3 -710 6 42.86
11 EO 4K S-2 -100 12 85.71
12 EO 3S S = 600 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Jeanine Bontemps 40,68 %
16 EO 3S N = 400 11 78.57
17 EO 2S W+2 -180 0 0.00
18 EO 3S E-2 100 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary 45,41 %
22 EO 2P N+5 260 10 71.43
23 EO 4P S-1 -100 12 85.71
24 EO 2C N = 110 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Michele Berrier 53,30 %
28 EO 6K S-1 -100 5.9 42.14
29 EO 3S E+2 -660 5.9 42.14
30 EO 2TcS-1 -100 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 47,38 %
A12 Eliane de Ceuninck -Annie Legrand 65,65 %
34 EO 2K S = 90 4.7 33.57
35 EO 4P W-2 200 1.3 9.29
36 EO 1S N-1 -100 5.9 42.14 µ Tbl = 28,33 %
Total : 163,3 / 336 = 48,60 %
PAIRE a.5 Antoinette Jourdain -Dominique Sassen
A.9 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 48,64 %
1 EO 2P E-1 50 7 50.00
2 EO 4C E = -420 4.7 33.57
3 EO 3S W+1 -630 10.4 74.29 µ Tbl = 52,62 %
A10 Brigitte Velge -Francoise Turin 47,07 %
7 EO 4C W+1 -650 11.6 82.86
8 EO 2P S-1 -50 8.1 57.86
9 EO 2P S = 110 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 52,62 %
A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Michele Berrier 53,30 %
13 EO 3K E = -110 0.1 0.71
14 EO 3S W+2 -460 7 50.00
15 EO 6C S-3 -300 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 44,52 %
A12 Eliane de Ceuninck -Annie Legrand 65,65 %
16 EO 3S N+1 430 4 28.57
17 EO 3S W = -400 6 42.86
18 EO 3S E-2 100 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.6 Lydia Luyten -Claire Derieuw 39,52 %
19 EO 4PcW = -790 13.9 99.29
20 EO 2P S+1 140 4.7 33.57
21 EO 4C S+1 650 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 66,43 %
A.1 Annette Fobe -Sophie Tilemans 48,30 %
22 EO 4P N+2 480 1 7.14
23 EO 2C N+1 140 5 35.71
24 EO 2C N = 110 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
A.7 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,89 %
25 EO 3P E = -140 9.3 66.43
26 EO 2C W-1 100 5.9 42.14
27 EO 3P S = 140 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 47,38 %
A.8 Philippe van der Gracht -Tina Katila 52,08 %
31 EO 3P E-2 100 2.4 17.14
32 EO 3S N-1 -50 12.7 90.71
33 EO 2K N = 90 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 58,10 %
Total : 162,1 / 336 = 48,24 %
PAIRE a.4 Daniel Malarme -Denise Pel
A.9 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 48,64 %
4 EO 3S N+1 630 0 0.00
5 EO 5KcN-1 -200 3 21.43
6 EO 3S W-1 100 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary 45,41 %
10 EO 6P W+1 -1460 14 100.00
11 EO 4CcW-2 300 0 0.00
12 EO 3S N+1 630 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
A11 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 49,63 %
13 EO 2C W+2 -170 8.1 57.86
14 EO 2C W+2 -170 4.7 33.57
15 EO 6S S-1 -100 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,14 %
A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Michele Berrier 53,30 %
16 EO 3S N+1 430 4 28.57
17 EO 3S W+2 -460 13 92.86
18 EO 4T W+1 -150 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
A12 Eliane de Ceuninck -Annie Legrand 65,65 %
19 EO 5KcN-1 -100 3.6 25.71
20 EO 2P N+1 140 4.7 33.57
21 EO 4C S+1 650 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 41,90 %
A.6 Lydia Luyten -Claire Derieuw 39,52 %
22 EO 4P N = 420 8 57.14
23 EO 1P S+1 110 8 57.14
24 EO 2C N-1 -50 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
A.7 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,89 %
28 EO 6K S-1 -100 5.9 42.14
29 EO 3S E+3 -690 11.6 82.86
30 EO 2S N-1 -50 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 50,24 %
A.8 Philippe van der Gracht -Tina Katila 52,08 %
34 EO 3KcS-1 -200 13.9 99.29
35 EO 1S N+1 120 4.7 33.57
36 EO 1S N = 90 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 44,52 %
Total : 161,2 / 336 = 47,98 %
PAIRE a.3 Didier Collart -Thierry Collart
A.8 Philippe van der Gracht -Tina Katila 52,08 %
1 EO 3P E-1 50 7 50.00
2 EO 4C E+2 -480 13.9 99.29
3 EO 3S W = -600 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 60,95 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Jeanine Bontemps 40,68 %
7 EO 4C W = -620 7 50.00
8 EO 2P S = 110 0.1 0.71
9 EO 2P S-1 -50 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 36,19 %
A10 Brigitte Velge -Francoise Turin 47,07 %
10 EO 4P W+3 -710 6 42.86
11 EO 5KcS-2 -300 14 100.00
12 EO 3T N = 110 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 80,95 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary 45,41 %
13 EO 3C W+1 -170 8.1 57.86
14 EO 3P E = -140 0.1 0.71
15 EO 6S S-3 -300 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 47,14 %
A11 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 49,63 %
16 EO 3S N+3 490 0 0.00
17 EO 3S W = -400 6 42.86
18 EO 3S E-2 100 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Michele Berrier 53,30 %
19 EO 4C N-2 -100 3.6 25.71
20 EO 2P S+1 140 4.7 33.57
21 EO 4C S+1 650 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 41,90 %
A.6 Lydia Luyten -Claire Derieuw 39,52 %
25 EO 4P E-1 100 3.6 25.71
26 EO 2C W+1 -140 13.9 99.29
27 EO 5K W-4 200 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 47,38 %
A.7 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,89 %
31 EO 3P E-1 50 5.9 42.14
32 EO 3S N = 400 4.7 33.57
33 EO 1P N+3 170 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 25,48 %
Total : 152,8 / 336 = 45,48 %
PAIRE a10 Caroll Pucher -Marie J. de Wagheneire
A.6 Lydia Luyten -Claire Derieuw 39,52 %
1 EO 3ScE-3 500 0.1 0.71
2 EO 4C E+1 -450 9.3 66.43
3 EO 4T W = -130 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 22,62 %
A12 Eliane de Ceuninck -Annie Legrand 65,65 %
4 EO 1S N+5 240 2 14.29
5 EO 5P E-1 50 0 0.00
6 EO 5K E-2 200 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 7,14 %
A.1 Annette Fobe -Sophie Tilemans 48,30 %
10 EO 4P W+3 -710 6 42.86
11 EO 4C W-2 100 3 21.43
12 EO 3S S+1 630 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
A.2 Jean de Villenfagne -Hedwig Fiems 58,95 %
16 EO 3S N = 400 11 78.57
17 EO 3S W = -400 6 42.86
18 EO 3S E-2 100 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Jeanine Bontemps 40,68 %
22 EO 3P N+1 170 14 100.00
23 EO 1P S+2 140 5 35.71
24 EO 2C N-1 -50 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
A10 Brigitte Velge -Francoise Turin 47,07 %
28 EO 6K N-2 -200 12.7 90.71
29 EO 3S E = -600 0.1 0.71
30 EO 2T S-1 -50 3.6 25.71 µ Tbl = 39,05 %
A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Michele Berrier 53,30 %
31 EO 2P E-1 50 5.9 42.14
32 EO 3S N = 400 4.7 33.57
33 EO 3P N = 140 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 36,43 %
A11 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 49,63 %
34 EO 1S S = 90 4.7 33.57
35 EO 4C E = -620 12.7 90.71
36 EO 2K N-2 -200 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 74,52 %
Total : 138,5 / 336 = 41,22 %
PAIRE a.7 Sybille Gillet -Caroline Lallia
A10 Brigitte Velge -Francoise Turin 47,07 %
1 EO 3T N-2 -100 11.6 82.86
2 EO 2K W+2 -130 0.1 0.71
3 EO 3S W = -600 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 39,05 %
A11 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 49,63 %
7 EO 3P E+1 -170 1.3 9.29
8 EO 2P S-1 -50 8.1 57.86
9 EO 2P S-1 -50 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
A12 Eliane de Ceuninck -Annie Legrand 65,65 %
13 EO 2C W+2 -170 8.1 57.86
14 EO 4K E+1 -150 2.4 17.14
15 EO 4C N+1 650 1.3 9.29 µ Tbl = 28,10 %
A.7 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,89 %
19 EO 4C N-3 -150 9.3 66.43
20 EO 1P N+2 140 4.7 33.57
21 EO 3S N+2 660 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 39,05 %
A.2 Jean de Villenfagne -Hedwig Fiems 58,95 %
22 EO 4P N+2 480 1 7.14
23 EO 4C S = 620 1 7.14
24 EO 3C N = 140 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 9,52 %
A.8 Philippe van der Gracht -Tina Katila 52,08 %
25 EO 3P E-1 100 3.6 25.71
26 EO 2C W-1 100 5.9 42.14
27 EO 3P S-1 -50 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 55,71 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Jeanine Bontemps 40,68 %
28 EO 5K S-1 -100 5.9 42.14
29 EO 3S W+3 -690 11.6 82.86
30 EO 3T S-2 -100 8.1 57.86 µ Tbl = 60,95 %
A.9 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 48,64 %
31 EO 2P E = -110 11.6 82.86
32 EO 3S N = 400 4.7 33.57
33 EO 1P N+2 140 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 136,1 / 336 = 40,51 %
PAIRE a.9 -
A11 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 49,63 %
1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A12 Eliane de Ceuninck -Annie Legrand 65,65 %
7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.1 Annette Fobe -Sophie Tilemans 48,30 %
13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.2 Jean de Villenfagne -Hedwig Fiems 58,95 %
19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00
21 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.9 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 48,64 %
25 EO BYE 0 0.00
26 EO BYE 0 0.00
27 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary 45,41 %
28 EO BYE 0 0.00
29 EO BYE 0 0.00
30 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A10 Brigitte Velge -Francoise Turin 47,07 %
31 EO BYE 0 0.00
32 EO BYE 0 0.00
33 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Michele Berrier 53,30 %
34 EO BYE 0 0.00
35 EO BYE 0 0.00
36 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 504 = 0,00 %
|