B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 68,75 A.9 Thierry Bollansee -Pascale Ortegat
--- 2 60,15 A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles
--- 3 53,47 A.7 Annie Legrand -Eliane de Ceuninck
--- 4 52,86 A12 Grazia Neuenschwander -Chantal de Lichtervelde
--- 5 50,02 A.3 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont
--- 6 49,49 A.1 Annette Fobe -Sophie Tilemans
--- 7 49,22 A.8 Anne Van den Berge -Pascale Nobels
--- 8 48,35 A13 Jeannine Thys -Yolande Waerseggers
--- 9 46,38 A11 Caroll Pucher -Sylviane Delbeke
--- 10 45,89 A14 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart
--- 11 45,32 A.4 Sandra Dallemagne -Marie Claire Vienne
--- 12 44,91 A.5 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier
--- 13 44,41 A.6 Didier Collart -Claire Derieuw
--- 14 40,68 A10 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne
--- 15 0,00 A15 -
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 61,89 a.3 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Luyten
--- 2 55,28 a.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert
--- 3 54,36 a.7 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere
--- 4 54,19 a.9 Francis Rittweger -Hugo Baetens
--- 5 51,63 a10 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon
--- 6 51,29 a.2 Francoise Duren -Gaetan van de Werve
--- 7 50,72 a11 Serge Alard -Veronique Englebienne
--- 8 50,25 a.4 Virginie Van Damme -Marianne Borsu
--- 9 48,97 a.8 Nadine Brabant -Pascale Bodart
--- 10 48,43 a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Jeannine Wanderpepen
--- 11 48,18 a13 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm
--- 12 45,76 a15 Brigitte Velge -Marie J. de Wagheneire
--- 13 45,39 a.5 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory
--- 14 43,55 a14 Elisabeth Harmant -Christiane Huby
--- 15 38,51 a12 Charles Velge -Sylviane Cornet
PAIRE A.9 Thierry Bollansee -Pascale Ortegat
a.2 Francoise Duren -Gaetan van de Werve 51,29 %
1 NS 4P S+3 510 16.5 75.00
2 NS 4C W-2 100 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
a.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 55,28 %
3 NS 4CcS-3 -500 0.1 0.45
4 NS 1TcE-2 500 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a15 Brigitte Velge -Marie J. de Wagheneire 45,76 %
5 NS 3S W = -400 6.6 30.00
6 NS 2K N-1 -50 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
a14 Elisabeth Harmant -Christiane Huby 43,55 %
7 NS 5TcE-3 800 21.9 99.55
8 NS 2C W-2 100 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
a13 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm 48,18 %
9 NS 4C N+1 450 20.8 94.55
10 NS 2S W-1 100 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 87,05 %
a.9 Francis Rittweger -Hugo Baetens 54,19 %
17 NS 6S W-1 50 20.8 94.55
18 NS 3P W-2 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a.8 Nadine Brabant -Pascale Bodart 48,97 %
19 NS 4C S+2 480 20.8 94.55
20 NS 4P W = -620 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 92,05 %
a.7 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 54,36 %
21 NS 4C N-1 -100 2.3 10.45
22 NS 5K E-2 200 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Jeannine Wanderpepen 48,43 %
23 NS 4P N-1 -100 9 40.91
24 NS 4C W-1 50 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.5 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 45,39 %
25 NS 4P S+1 450 18 81.82
26 NS 3S S+2 660 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
a.4 Virginie Van Damme -Marianne Borsu 50,25 %
27 NS 4P W-1 50 18 81.82
28 NS 3S W+1 -430 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.3 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Luyten 61,89 %
29 NS 2P S = 110 14.3 65.00
30 NS 4C S+1 450 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
Total : 363,0 / 528 = 68,75 %
PAIRE A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles
a.2 Francoise Duren -Gaetan van de Werve 51,29 %
3 NS 2C N-1 -50 16.5 75.00
4 NS 1T E-2 200 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 55,28 %
5 NS 3C E-1 50 11 50.00
6 NS 1S N+1 120 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
a15 Brigitte Velge -Marie J. de Wagheneire 45,76 %
7 NS 5TcE-2 500 18.6 84.55
8 NS 2C W-3 150 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
a14 Elisabeth Harmant -Christiane Huby 43,55 %
9 NS 4C N = 420 11 50.00
10 NS 1S W+1 -120 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a13 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm 48,18 %
11 NS 1S S+2 150 20.8 94.55
12 NS 2P E = -110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a12 Charles Velge -Sylviane Cornet 38,51 %
13 NS 3S W-2 200 20.8 94.55
14 NS 3C S = 140 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 87,05 %
a11 Serge Alard -Veronique Englebienne 50,72 %
15 NS 2P E+2 -170 8.8 40.00
16 NS 4P N+2 480 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a10 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon 51,63 %
17 NS 6S W = -990 0.1 0.45
18 NS 1S S+1 120 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
a.9 Francis Rittweger -Hugo Baetens 54,19 %
19 NS 3P W-2 200 9.9 45.00
20 NS 4P W+1 -650 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a.8 Nadine Brabant -Pascale Bodart 48,97 %
21 NS 4K W-1 50 6.6 30.00
22 NS 5K E-1 100 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a.7 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 54,36 %
23 NS 4P N-1 -100 9 40.91
24 NS 3C W = -140 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Jeannine Wanderpepen 48,43 %
25 NS 2P S+2 170 8 36.36
26 NS 3S S+2 660 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
Total : 317,6 / 528 = 60,15 %
PAIRE A.7 Annie Legrand -Eliane de Ceuninck
a13 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm 48,18 %
1 NS 5K S+2 440 5.5 25.00
2 NS 4C W = -420 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 12,73 %
a12 Charles Velge -Sylviane Cornet 38,51 %
3 NS 2C N-1 -50 16.5 75.00
4 NS 2T S = 90 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a11 Serge Alard -Veronique Englebienne 50,72 %
5 NS 3S W-1 50 11 50.00
6 NS 1S W-1 100 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a.7 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 54,36 %
13 NS 3S W-2 200 20.8 94.55
14 NS 3C S = 140 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 87,05 %
a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Jeannine Wanderpepen 48,43 %
15 NS 4P E = -420 0.1 0.45
16 NS 4P N+2 480 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
a.5 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 45,39 %
17 NS 5K W+1 -420 14.3 65.00
18 NS 2C N = 110 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
a.4 Virginie Van Damme -Marianne Borsu 50,25 %
19 NS 3P W-1 100 4.5 20.45
20 NS 4P W+1 -650 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a.3 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Luyten 61,89 %
21 NS 4C N = 620 14.3 65.00
22 NS 5K E-1 100 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Gaetan van de Werve 51,29 %
23 NS 4P N-1 -100 9 40.91
24 NS 2C W+1 -140 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 55,28 %
25 NS 4P S+1 450 18 81.82
26 NS 3S S+1 630 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a15 Brigitte Velge -Marie J. de Wagheneire 45,76 %
27 NS 3P W = -140 12 54.55
28 NS 3S E = -400 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a14 Elisabeth Harmant -Christiane Huby 43,55 %
29 NS 2P S+1 140 20.8 94.55
30 NS 4C S+1 450 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
Total : 282,3 / 528 = 53,47 %
PAIRE A12 Grazia Neuenschwander -Chantal de Lichtervelde
a.8 Nadine Brabant -Pascale Bodart 48,97 %
1 NS 3S N+2 460 8.8 40.00
2 NS 4C W-1 50 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a.7 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 54,36 %
3 NS 2P W = -110 13.2 60.00
4 NS 1P E-1 100 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Jeannine Wanderpepen 48,43 %
5 NS 3S W-2 100 18.6 84.55
6 NS 1S N = 90 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a.5 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 45,39 %
7 NS 4T E-2 200 14.3 65.00
8 NS 3C W-2 100 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
a.4 Virginie Van Damme -Marianne Borsu 50,25 %
9 NS 4C N = 420 11 50.00
10 NS 1S W-1 100 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a.3 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Luyten 61,89 %
11 NS 3T S+1 130 17.5 79.55
12 NS 3C N-1 -100 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Gaetan van de Werve 51,29 %
13 NS 3T E+2 -150 8.8 40.00
14 NS 4C S-1 -50 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 55,28 %
15 NS 2P E+2 -170 8.8 40.00
16 NS 4P N+2 480 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a12 Charles Velge -Sylviane Cornet 38,51 %
23 NS 4P N-1 -100 9 40.91
24 NS 3C W-1 50 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a11 Serge Alard -Veronique Englebienne 50,72 %
25 NS 4P N = 420 11 50.00
26 NS 2T S+3 150 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a10 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon 51,63 %
27 NS 4P W-1 50 18 81.82
28 NS 3S W+1 -430 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.9 Francis Rittweger -Hugo Baetens 54,19 %
29 NS 2S N-1 -100 6.6 30.00
30 NS 4C S+1 450 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
Total : 279,1 / 528 = 52,86 %
PAIRE A.3 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont
a.3 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Luyten 61,89 %
5 NS 3S W+1 -430 2.3 10.45
6 NS 1S W = -90 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Gaetan van de Werve 51,29 %
7 NS 5TcE-2 500 18.6 84.55
8 NS 2C W = -110 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 55,28 %
9 NS 4C N = 420 11 50.00
10 NS 2S W-1 100 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a15 Brigitte Velge -Marie J. de Wagheneire 45,76 %
11 NS 2T E-2 100 8.8 40.00
12 NS 3C N = 140 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
a14 Elisabeth Harmant -Christiane Huby 43,55 %
13 NS 4K N-3 -300 2.3 10.45
14 NS 3C S+1 170 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a13 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm 48,18 %
15 NS 2P E+2 -170 8.8 40.00
16 NS 4P N+2 480 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a12 Charles Velge -Sylviane Cornet 38,51 %
17 NS 4P S-2 -100 17.5 79.55
18 NS 2C N+1 140 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 84,55 %
a11 Serge Alard -Veronique Englebienne 50,72 %
19 NS 3P W-2 200 9.9 45.00
20 NS 4P W = -620 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a10 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon 51,63 %
21 NS 4PcE-4 800 21.9 99.55
22 NS 3K E+1 -130 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a.9 Francis Rittweger -Hugo Baetens 54,19 %
23 NS 4P N-2 -200 1 4.55
24 NS 3C W+1 -170 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
a.8 Nadine Brabant -Pascale Bodart 48,97 %
25 NS 3S N-1 -50 3 13.64
26 NS 3S S+1 630 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a.7 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 54,36 %
27 NS 4T S-2 -100 14 63.64
28 NS 3S W+1 -430 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
Total : 264,1 / 528 = 50,02 %
PAIRE A.1 Annette Fobe -Sophie Tilemans
a.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 55,28 %
1 NS 5K S+2 440 5.5 25.00
2 NS 3C W = -140 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
a15 Brigitte Velge -Marie J. de Wagheneire 45,76 %
3 NS 3S E-3 300 21.9 99.55
4 NS 1S S+1 120 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
a14 Elisabeth Harmant -Christiane Huby 43,55 %
5 NS 3S W-1 50 11 50.00
6 NS 2T W-1 100 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a13 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm 48,18 %
7 NS 3C S-1 -100 8.8 40.00
8 NS 2C W = -110 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a12 Charles Velge -Sylviane Cornet 38,51 %
9 NS 4C N+1 450 20.8 94.55
10 NS 2S W-2 200 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 97,05 %
a11 Serge Alard -Veronique Englebienne 50,72 %
11 NS 2C E-3 150 20.8 94.55
12 NS 3P E+1 -170 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
a10 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon 51,63 %
13 NS 1S E+2 -150 8.8 40.00
14 NS 3C S-1 -50 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a.9 Francis Rittweger -Hugo Baetens 54,19 %
15 NS 2P E+2 -170 8.8 40.00
16 NS 4P N+2 480 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a.8 Nadine Brabant -Pascale Bodart 48,97 %
17 NS 5C E = -450 11 50.00
18 NS 2C N-1 -100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.7 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 54,36 %
19 NS 2P W+1 -140 0.1 0.45
20 NS 4P W+1 -650 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Jeannine Wanderpepen 48,43 %
21 NS 4C N = 620 14.3 65.00
22 NS 5K E-1 100 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a.5 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 45,39 %
23 NS 3S S+1 630 22 100.00
24 NS 3C W+1 -170 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
Total : 261,3 / 528 = 49,49 %
PAIRE A.8 Anne Van den Berge -Pascale Nobels
a15 Brigitte Velge -Marie J. de Wagheneire 45,76 %
1 NS 4P S+3 510 16.5 75.00
2 NS 4C W-1 50 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a14 Elisabeth Harmant -Christiane Huby 43,55 %
3 NS 2P W+2 -170 5.5 25.00
4 NS 1P E-1 100 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
a13 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm 48,18 %
5 NS 3S W-2 100 18.6 84.55
6 NS 1S N+1 120 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 87,05 %
a12 Charles Velge -Sylviane Cornet 38,51 %
7 NS 4CcS-2 -500 2.3 10.45
8 NS 1S W-2 100 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a.8 Nadine Brabant -Pascale Bodart 48,97 %
15 NS 4P E-1 50 20.8 94.55
16 NS 4P N+3 510 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
a.7 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 54,36 %
17 NS 3S W+2 -460 6.6 30.00
18 NS 2T E+1 -110 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 27,50 %
a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Jeannine Wanderpepen 48,43 %
19 NS 4C N = 420 16.5 75.00
20 NS 4P W+1 -650 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.5 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 45,39 %
21 NS 4C N-1 -100 2.3 10.45
22 NS 5K E-1 100 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a.4 Virginie Van Damme -Marianne Borsu 50,25 %
23 NS 2P N+1 140 17 77.27
24 NS 2C W+1 -140 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a.3 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Luyten 61,89 %
25 NS 2S N = 120 6 27.27
26 NS 2T S+2 130 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Gaetan van de Werve 51,29 %
27 NS 4P W-1 50 18 81.82
28 NS 3S E+1 -430 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 55,28 %
29 NS 1S N = 90 11 50.00
30 NS 2S N+4 240 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
Total : 259,9 / 528 = 49,22 %
PAIRE A13 Jeannine Thys -Yolande Waerseggers
a10 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon 51,63 %
1 NS 4P S+3 510 16.5 75.00
2 NS 4C W-1 50 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a.9 Francis Rittweger -Hugo Baetens 54,19 %
3 NS 2P W+2 -170 5.5 25.00
4 NS 1T E-2 200 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.8 Nadine Brabant -Pascale Bodart 48,97 %
5 NS 3S W+1 -430 2.3 10.45
6 NS 1S N+1 120 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.7 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 54,36 %
7 NS 5T E-2 200 14.3 65.00
8 NS 2C W-1 50 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Jeannine Wanderpepen 48,43 %
9 NS 4C N = 420 11 50.00
10 NS 2S W = -120 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.5 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 45,39 %
11 NS 1S N+1 120 14.3 65.00
12 NS 3C N-1 -100 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 67,50 %
a.4 Virginie Van Damme -Marianne Borsu 50,25 %
13 NS 5T E = -600 0.1 0.45
14 NS 3C S = 140 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a.3 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Luyten 61,89 %
15 NS 3P E+1 -170 8.8 40.00
16 NS 4P N+3 510 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Gaetan van de Werve 51,29 %
17 NS 4S W+2 -490 2.3 10.45
18 NS 3T E+1 -130 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
a13 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm 48,18 %
25 NS 4P S+1 450 18 81.82
26 NS 3S S+1 630 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a12 Charles Velge -Sylviane Cornet 38,51 %
27 NS 4P W-2 100 22 100.00
28 NS 3S E+1 -430 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a11 Serge Alard -Veronique Englebienne 50,72 %
29 NS 4P N-3 -300 1.2 5.45
30 NS 3S N+1 430 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 7,95 %
Total : 255,3 / 528 = 48,35 %
PAIRE A11 Caroll Pucher -Sylviane Delbeke
a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Jeannine Wanderpepen 48,43 %
1 NS 6K N = 920 21.9 99.55
2 NS 4C W-1 50 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a.5 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 45,39 %
3 NS 2P W+1 -140 11 50.00
4 NS 1P E = -80 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
a.4 Virginie Van Damme -Marianne Borsu 50,25 %
5 NS 3S W+1 -430 2.3 10.45
6 NS 2S N-2 -100 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 12,95 %
a.3 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Luyten 61,89 %
7 NS 4T E-1 100 11 50.00
8 NS 2C W = -110 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Gaetan van de Werve 51,29 %
9 NS 4C N = 420 11 50.00
10 NS 2KcN-2 -500 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
a.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 55,28 %
11 NS 1S N = 90 6.6 30.00
12 NS 3C N-2 -200 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
a15 Brigitte Velge -Marie J. de Wagheneire 45,76 %
13 NS 3K N-1 -100 16.5 75.00
14 NS 1S N+1 120 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
a11 Serge Alard -Veronique Englebienne 50,72 %
21 NS 4C N = 620 14.3 65.00
22 NS 5K E-2 200 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
a10 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon 51,63 %
23 NS 3S S = 600 20 90.91
24 NS 2C W+2 -170 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a.9 Francis Rittweger -Hugo Baetens 54,19 %
25 NS 4P S+1 450 18 81.82
26 NS 3S N+1 630 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a.8 Nadine Brabant -Pascale Bodart 48,97 %
27 NS 4P W = -420 4 18.18
28 NS 3S W+1 -430 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.7 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 54,36 %
29 NS 2C S = 110 14.3 65.00
30 NS 4C S+1 450 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
Total : 244,9 / 528 = 46,38 %
PAIRE A14 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart
a12 Charles Velge -Sylviane Cornet 38,51 %
1 NS 4P S+3 510 16.5 75.00
2 NS 3C W-1 50 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a11 Serge Alard -Veronique Englebienne 50,72 %
3 NS 4P E-1 100 19.7 89.55
4 NS 1T E-2 200 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 84,55 %
a10 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon 51,63 %
5 NS 3S W-2 100 18.6 84.55
6 NS 3C S-3 -150 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a.9 Francis Rittweger -Hugo Baetens 54,19 %
7 NS 4CcS-2 -500 2.3 10.45
8 NS 2C W = -110 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 12,95 %
a.8 Nadine Brabant -Pascale Bodart 48,97 %
9 NS 4C N-1 -50 1.2 5.45
10 NS 2S W = -120 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a.7 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 54,36 %
11 NS 2C E-1 50 3.4 15.45
12 NS 3P E+1 -170 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Jeannine Wanderpepen 48,43 %
13 NS 3K N-1 -100 16.5 75.00
14 NS 4C S-2 -100 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a.5 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 45,39 %
15 NS 3P E+1 -170 8.8 40.00
16 NS 6P N+1 1010 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
a.4 Virginie Van Damme -Marianne Borsu 50,25 %
17 NS 5C E-1 50 20.8 94.55
18 NS 2C N+1 140 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 92,05 %
a.3 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Luyten 61,89 %
19 NS 5C N-2 -100 2.3 10.45
20 NS 4P W+1 -650 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a14 Elisabeth Harmant -Christiane Huby 43,55 %
27 NS 4P W = -420 4 18.18
28 NS 3S W = -400 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a13 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm 48,18 %
29 NS 4C S-3 -300 1.2 5.45
30 NS 4C S+1 450 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
Total : 242,3 / 528 = 45,89 %
PAIRE A.4 Sandra Dallemagne -Marie Claire Vienne
a.4 Virginie Van Damme -Marianne Borsu 50,25 %
7 NS 4C S-2 -200 6.6 30.00
8 NS 2S W-3 150 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a.3 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Luyten 61,89 %
9 NS 4C N = 420 11 50.00
10 NS 2KcN-3 -800 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Gaetan van de Werve 51,29 %
11 NS 2P W = -110 0.1 0.45
12 NS 2T S-1 -100 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
a.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 55,28 %
13 NS 3T E+1 -130 13.2 60.00
14 NS 1S N+1 120 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a15 Brigitte Velge -Marie J. de Wagheneire 45,76 %
15 NS 3P E+1 -170 8.8 40.00
16 NS 4P N+2 480 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a14 Elisabeth Harmant -Christiane Huby 43,55 %
17 NS 3S W+2 -460 6.6 30.00
18 NS 3C N-2 -200 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
a13 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm 48,18 %
19 NS 4P W-2 200 9.9 45.00
20 NS 4P W = -620 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a12 Charles Velge -Sylviane Cornet 38,51 %
21 NS 4C N = 620 14.3 65.00
22 NS 3S E+1 -630 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
a11 Serge Alard -Veronique Englebienne 50,72 %
23 NS 4P N-1 -100 9 40.91
24 NS 2C W+2 -170 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a10 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon 51,63 %
25 NS 4P S = 420 11 50.00
26 NS 3S S+1 630 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.9 Francis Rittweger -Hugo Baetens 54,19 %
27 NS 4P W = -420 4 18.18
28 NS 2P W+1 -140 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.8 Nadine Brabant -Pascale Bodart 48,97 %
29 NS 1S N+1 120 17.5 79.55
30 NS 4C S+1 450 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
Total : 239,3 / 528 = 45,32 %
PAIRE A.5 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier
a.9 Francis Rittweger -Hugo Baetens 54,19 %
1 NS 4P S+2 480 11 50.00
2 NS 4C W-2 100 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
a.5 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 45,39 %
9 NS 4C N = 420 11 50.00
10 NS 3S W+1 -630 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a.4 Virginie Van Damme -Marianne Borsu 50,25 %
11 NS 2P W-1 50 3.4 15.45
12 NS 2P E+1 -140 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a.3 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Luyten 61,89 %
13 NS 3T E+3 -170 4.5 20.45
14 NS 2S N-1 -50 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Gaetan van de Werve 51,29 %
15 NS 3P E = -140 17.5 79.55
16 NS 4P N+1 450 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 55,28 %
17 NS 3S W+2 -460 6.6 30.00
18 NS 2C N+1 140 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
a15 Brigitte Velge -Marie J. de Wagheneire 45,76 %
19 NS 3P W-2 200 9.9 45.00
20 NS 4P W+1 -650 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a14 Elisabeth Harmant -Christiane Huby 43,55 %
21 NS 4C N = 620 14.3 65.00
22 NS 3S W-1 100 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a13 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm 48,18 %
23 NS 4P N-1 -100 9 40.91
24 NS 3C W+1 -170 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a12 Charles Velge -Sylviane Cornet 38,51 %
25 NS 3S N-4 -200 0 0.00
26 NS 3S S+2 660 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a11 Serge Alard -Veronique Englebienne 50,72 %
27 NS 3P W+1 -170 10 45.45
28 NS 3S W+1 -430 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a10 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon 51,63 %
29 NS 2C S+1 140 20.8 94.55
30 NS 4C S+1 450 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
Total : 237,1 / 528 = 44,91 %
PAIRE A.6 Didier Collart -Claire Derieuw
a11 Serge Alard -Veronique Englebienne 50,72 %
1 NS 3P S+4 260 1.2 5.45
2 NS 4C W-2 100 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a10 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon 51,63 %
3 NS 2P W+2 -170 5.5 25.00
4 NS 2K N-3 -300 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 12,73 %
a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Jeannine Wanderpepen 48,43 %
11 NS 3T S = 110 11 50.00
12 NS 4C N-3 -300 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a.5 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 45,39 %
13 NS 3T E+2 -150 8.8 40.00
14 NS 2S N = 120 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.4 Virginie Van Damme -Marianne Borsu 50,25 %
15 NS 4P E-1 50 20.8 94.55
16 NS 4P N+2 480 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a.3 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Luyten 61,89 %
17 NS 5K W+1 -420 14.3 65.00
18 NS 3T E = -110 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Gaetan van de Werve 51,29 %
19 NS 4C S+2 480 20.8 94.55
20 NS 4P W+1 -650 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 55,28 %
21 NS 4C N-1 -100 2.3 10.45
22 NS 5K E-1 100 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a15 Brigitte Velge -Marie J. de Wagheneire 45,76 %
23 NS 4P N-2 -200 1 4.55
24 NS 3C W = -140 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a14 Elisabeth Harmant -Christiane Huby 43,55 %
25 NS 4P S+1 450 18 81.82
26 NS 3S S+1 630 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a13 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm 48,18 %
27 NS 4P W = -420 4 18.18
28 NS 3S E = -400 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a12 Charles Velge -Sylviane Cornet 38,51 %
29 NS 3T N-1 -100 6.6 30.00
30 NS 4C S+1 450 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
Total : 234,5 / 528 = 44,41 %
PAIRE A10 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne
a.4 Virginie Van Damme -Marianne Borsu 50,25 %
1 NS 3P S+4 260 1.2 5.45
2 NS 4C W-1 50 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a.3 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Luyten 61,89 %
3 NS 2P E+2 -170 5.5 25.00
4 NS 1K N-1 -100 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Gaetan van de Werve 51,29 %
5 NS 3S W-2 100 18.6 84.55
6 NS 2S S-2 -100 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 55,28 %
7 NS 4CcS-2 -500 2.3 10.45
8 NS 2S W-2 100 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a15 Brigitte Velge -Marie J. de Wagheneire 45,76 %
9 NS 4C N-1 -50 1.2 5.45
10 NS 2KcN-1 -200 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
a14 Elisabeth Harmant -Christiane Huby 43,55 %
11 NS 2S N = 120 14.3 65.00
12 NS 2S W-1 50 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a10 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon 51,63 %
19 NS 4C S = 420 16.5 75.00
20 NS 4P W+1 -650 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.9 Francis Rittweger -Hugo Baetens 54,19 %
21 NS 4C N = 620 14.3 65.00
22 NS 3S E+1 -630 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
a.8 Nadine Brabant -Pascale Bodart 48,97 %
23 NS 3P N = 140 17 77.27
24 NS 2C W+2 -170 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.7 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 54,36 %
25 NS 3S N-1 -50 3 13.64
26 NS 3S S+1 630 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Jeannine Wanderpepen 48,43 %
27 NS 4P W = -420 4 18.18
28 NS 3S E = -400 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.5 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 45,39 %
29 NS 3C S-1 -100 6.6 30.00
30 NS 4C S+1 450 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
Total : 214,8 / 528 = 40,68 %
PAIRE A15 -
a14 Elisabeth Harmant -Christiane Huby 43,55 %
1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a13 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm 48,18 %
3 NS BYE 0 0.00
4 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a12 Charles Velge -Sylviane Cornet 38,51 %
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a11 Serge Alard -Veronique Englebienne 50,72 %
7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a10 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon 51,63 %
9 NS BYE 0 0.00
10 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.9 Francis Rittweger -Hugo Baetens 54,19 %
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.8 Nadine Brabant -Pascale Bodart 48,97 %
13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.7 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 54,36 %
15 NS BYE 0 0.00
16 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Jeannine Wanderpepen 48,43 %
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.5 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 45,39 %
19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.4 Virginie Van Damme -Marianne Borsu 50,25 %
21 NS BYE 0 0.00
22 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a15 Brigitte Velge -Marie J. de Wagheneire 45,76 %
29 NS BYE 0 0.00
30 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 660 = 0,00 %
PAIRE a.3 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Luyten
A10 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 40,68 %
3 EO 2P E+2 -170 16.5 75.00
4 EO 1K N-1 -100 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
A.3 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 50,02 %
5 EO 3S W+1 -430 19.7 89.55
6 EO 1S W = -90 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
A11 Caroll Pucher -Sylviane Delbeke 46,38 %
7 EO 4T E-1 100 11 50.00
8 EO 2C W = -110 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A.4 Sandra Dallemagne -Marie Claire Vienne 45,32 %
9 EO 4C N = 420 11 50.00
10 EO 2KcN-3 -800 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A12 Grazia Neuenschwander -Chantal de Lichtervelde 52,86 %
11 EO 3T S+1 130 4.5 20.45
12 EO 3C N-1 -100 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A.5 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 44,91 %
13 EO 3T E+3 -170 17.5 79.55
14 EO 2S N-1 -50 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
A13 Jeannine Thys -Yolande Waerseggers 48,35 %
15 EO 3P E+1 -170 13.2 60.00
16 EO 4P N+3 510 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A.6 Didier Collart -Claire Derieuw 44,41 %
17 EO 5K W+1 -420 7.7 35.00
18 EO 3T E = -110 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A14 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 45,89 %
19 EO 5C N-2 -100 19.7 89.55
20 EO 4P W+1 -650 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.7 Annie Legrand -Eliane de Ceuninck 53,47 %
21 EO 4C N = 620 7.7 35.00
22 EO 5K E-1 100 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A.8 Anne Van den Berge -Pascale Nobels 49,22 %
25 EO 2S N = 120 16 72.73
26 EO 2T S+2 130 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
A.9 Thierry Bollansee -Pascale Ortegat 68,75 %
29 EO 2P S = 110 7.7 35.00
30 EO 4C S+1 450 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
Total : 326,8 / 528 = 61,89 %
PAIRE a.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert
A.1 Annette Fobe -Sophie Tilemans 49,49 %
1 EO 5K S+2 440 16.5 75.00
2 EO 3C W = -140 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
A.9 Thierry Bollansee -Pascale Ortegat 68,75 %
3 EO 4CcS-3 -500 21.9 99.55
4 EO 1TcE-2 500 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 60,15 %
5 EO 3C E-1 50 11 50.00
6 EO 1S N+1 120 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
A10 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 40,68 %
7 EO 4CcS-2 -500 19.7 89.55
8 EO 2S W-2 100 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A.3 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 50,02 %
9 EO 4C N = 420 11 50.00
10 EO 2S W-1 100 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A11 Caroll Pucher -Sylviane Delbeke 46,38 %
11 EO 1S N = 90 15.4 70.00
12 EO 3C N-2 -200 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
A.4 Sandra Dallemagne -Marie Claire Vienne 45,32 %
13 EO 3T E+1 -130 8.8 40.00
14 EO 1S N+1 120 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A12 Grazia Neuenschwander -Chantal de Lichtervelde 52,86 %
15 EO 2P E+2 -170 13.2 60.00
16 EO 4P N+2 480 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A.5 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 44,91 %
17 EO 3S W+2 -460 15.4 70.00
18 EO 2C N+1 140 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
A.6 Didier Collart -Claire Derieuw 44,41 %
21 EO 4C N-1 -100 19.7 89.55
22 EO 5K E-1 100 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A.7 Annie Legrand -Eliane de Ceuninck 53,47 %
25 EO 4P S+1 450 4 18.18
26 EO 3S S+1 630 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.8 Anne Van den Berge -Pascale Nobels 49,22 %
29 EO 1S N = 90 11 50.00
30 EO 2S N+4 240 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
Total : 291,9 / 528 = 55,28 %
PAIRE a.7 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere
A12 Grazia Neuenschwander -Chantal de Lichtervelde 52,86 %
3 EO 2P W = -110 8.8 40.00
4 EO 1P E-1 100 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A13 Jeannine Thys -Yolande Waerseggers 48,35 %
7 EO 5T E-2 200 7.7 35.00
8 EO 2C W-1 50 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A14 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 45,89 %
11 EO 2C E-1 50 18.6 84.55
12 EO 3P E+1 -170 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
A.7 Annie Legrand -Eliane de Ceuninck 53,47 %
13 EO 3S W-2 200 1.2 5.45
14 EO 3C S = 140 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 12,95 %
A15 - 0,00 %
15 EO BYE 0 0.00
16 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.8 Anne Van den Berge -Pascale Nobels 49,22 %
17 EO 3S W+2 -460 15.4 70.00
18 EO 2T E+1 -110 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 72,50 %
A.1 Annette Fobe -Sophie Tilemans 49,49 %
19 EO 2P W+1 -140 21.9 99.55
20 EO 4P W+1 -650 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
A.9 Thierry Bollansee -Pascale Ortegat 68,75 %
21 EO 4C N-1 -100 19.7 89.55
22 EO 5K E-2 200 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 60,15 %
23 EO 4P N-1 -100 13 59.09
24 EO 3C W = -140 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A10 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 40,68 %
25 EO 3S N-1 -50 19 86.36
26 EO 3S S+1 630 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A.3 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 50,02 %
27 EO 4T S-2 -100 8 36.36
28 EO 3S W+1 -430 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A11 Caroll Pucher -Sylviane Delbeke 46,38 %
29 EO 2C S = 110 7.7 35.00
30 EO 4C S+1 450 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
Total : 263,1 / 484 = 54,36 %
PAIRE a.9 Francis Rittweger -Hugo Baetens
A.5 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 44,91 %
1 EO 4P S+2 480 11 50.00
2 EO 4C W-2 100 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
A13 Jeannine Thys -Yolande Waerseggers 48,35 %
3 EO 2P W+2 -170 16.5 75.00
4 EO 1T E-2 200 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A14 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 45,89 %
7 EO 4CcS-2 -500 19.7 89.55
8 EO 2C W = -110 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 87,05 %
A15 - 0,00 %
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.1 Annette Fobe -Sophie Tilemans 49,49 %
15 EO 2P E+2 -170 13.2 60.00
16 EO 4P N+2 480 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A.9 Thierry Bollansee -Pascale Ortegat 68,75 %
17 EO 6S W-1 50 1.2 5.45
18 EO 3P W-2 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 60,15 %
19 EO 3P W-2 200 12.1 55.00
20 EO 4P W+1 -650 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A10 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 40,68 %
21 EO 4C N = 620 7.7 35.00
22 EO 3S E+1 -630 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A.3 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 50,02 %
23 EO 4P N-2 -200 21 95.45
24 EO 3C W+1 -170 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
A11 Caroll Pucher -Sylviane Delbeke 46,38 %
25 EO 4P S+1 450 4 18.18
26 EO 3S N+1 630 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.4 Sandra Dallemagne -Marie Claire Vienne 45,32 %
27 EO 4P W = -420 18 81.82
28 EO 2P W+1 -140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A12 Grazia Neuenschwander -Chantal de Lichtervelde 52,86 %
29 EO 2S N-1 -100 15.4 70.00
30 EO 4C S+1 450 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
Total : 262,3 / 484 = 54,19 %
PAIRE a10 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon
A13 Jeannine Thys -Yolande Waerseggers 48,35 %
1 EO 4P S+3 510 5.5 25.00
2 EO 4C W-1 50 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A.6 Didier Collart -Claire Derieuw 44,41 %
3 EO 2P W+2 -170 16.5 75.00
4 EO 2K N-3 -300 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 87,27 %
A14 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 45,89 %
5 EO 3S W-2 100 3.4 15.45
6 EO 3C S-3 -150 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A15 - 0,00 %
9 EO BYE 0 0.00
10 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.1 Annette Fobe -Sophie Tilemans 49,49 %
13 EO 1S E+2 -150 13.2 60.00
14 EO 3C S-1 -50 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 60,15 %
17 EO 6S W = -990 21.9 99.55
18 EO 1S S+1 120 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A10 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 40,68 %
19 EO 4C S = 420 5.5 25.00
20 EO 4P W+1 -650 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.3 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 50,02 %
21 EO 4PcE-4 800 0.1 0.45
22 EO 3K E+1 -130 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A11 Caroll Pucher -Sylviane Delbeke 46,38 %
23 EO 3S S = 600 2 9.09
24 EO 2C W+2 -170 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A.4 Sandra Dallemagne -Marie Claire Vienne 45,32 %
25 EO 4P S = 420 11 50.00
26 EO 3S S+1 630 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A12 Grazia Neuenschwander -Chantal de Lichtervelde 52,86 %
27 EO 4P W-1 50 4 18.18
28 EO 3S W+1 -430 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.5 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 44,91 %
29 EO 2C S+1 140 1.2 5.45
30 EO 4C S+1 450 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
Total : 249,9 / 484 = 51,63 %
PAIRE a.2 Francoise Duren -Gaetan van de Werve
A.9 Thierry Bollansee -Pascale Ortegat 68,75 %
1 EO 4P S+3 510 5.5 25.00
2 EO 4C W-2 100 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 60,15 %
3 EO 2C N-1 -50 5.5 25.00
4 EO 1T E-2 200 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A10 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 40,68 %
5 EO 3S W-2 100 3.4 15.45
6 EO 2S S-2 -100 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.3 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 50,02 %
7 EO 5TcE-2 500 3.4 15.45
8 EO 2C W = -110 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A11 Caroll Pucher -Sylviane Delbeke 46,38 %
9 EO 4C N = 420 11 50.00
10 EO 2KcN-2 -500 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A.4 Sandra Dallemagne -Marie Claire Vienne 45,32 %
11 EO 2P W = -110 21.9 99.55
12 EO 2T S-1 -100 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A12 Grazia Neuenschwander -Chantal de Lichtervelde 52,86 %
13 EO 3T E+2 -150 13.2 60.00
14 EO 4C S-1 -50 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A.5 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 44,91 %
15 EO 3P E = -140 4.5 20.45
16 EO 4P N+1 450 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A13 Jeannine Thys -Yolande Waerseggers 48,35 %
17 EO 4S W+2 -490 19.7 89.55
18 EO 3T E+1 -130 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
A.6 Didier Collart -Claire Derieuw 44,41 %
19 EO 4C S+2 480 1.2 5.45
20 EO 4P W+1 -650 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A.7 Annie Legrand -Eliane de Ceuninck 53,47 %
23 EO 4P N-1 -100 13 59.09
24 EO 2C W+1 -140 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.8 Anne Van den Berge -Pascale Nobels 49,22 %
27 EO 4P W-1 50 4 18.18
28 EO 3S E+1 -430 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
Total : 270,8 / 528 = 51,29 %
PAIRE a11 Serge Alard -Veronique Englebienne
A.6 Didier Collart -Claire Derieuw 44,41 %
1 EO 3P S+4 260 20.8 94.55
2 EO 4C W-2 100 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A14 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 45,89 %
3 EO 4P E-1 100 2.3 10.45
4 EO 1T E-2 200 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 15,45 %
A.7 Annie Legrand -Eliane de Ceuninck 53,47 %
5 EO 3S W-1 50 11 50.00
6 EO 1S W-1 100 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A15 - 0,00 %
7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.1 Annette Fobe -Sophie Tilemans 49,49 %
11 EO 2C E-3 150 1.2 5.45
12 EO 3P E+1 -170 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 60,15 %
15 EO 2P E+2 -170 13.2 60.00
16 EO 4P N+2 480 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A.3 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 50,02 %
19 EO 3P W-2 200 12.1 55.00
20 EO 4P W = -620 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A11 Caroll Pucher -Sylviane Delbeke 46,38 %
21 EO 4C N = 620 7.7 35.00
22 EO 5K E-2 200 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
A.4 Sandra Dallemagne -Marie Claire Vienne 45,32 %
23 EO 4P N-1 -100 13 59.09
24 EO 2C W+2 -170 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A12 Grazia Neuenschwander -Chantal de Lichtervelde 52,86 %
25 EO 4P N = 420 11 50.00
26 EO 2T S+3 150 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A.5 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 44,91 %
27 EO 3P W+1 -170 12 54.55
28 EO 3S W+1 -430 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A13 Jeannine Thys -Yolande Waerseggers 48,35 %
29 EO 4P N-3 -300 20.8 94.55
30 EO 3S N+1 430 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 92,05 %
Total : 245,5 / 484 = 50,72 %
PAIRE a.4 Virginie Van Damme -Marianne Borsu
A10 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 40,68 %
1 EO 3P S+4 260 20.8 94.55
2 EO 4C W-1 50 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A11 Caroll Pucher -Sylviane Delbeke 46,38 %
5 EO 3S W+1 -430 19.7 89.55
6 EO 2S N-2 -100 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 87,05 %
A.4 Sandra Dallemagne -Marie Claire Vienne 45,32 %
7 EO 4C S-2 -200 15.4 70.00
8 EO 2S W-3 150 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A12 Grazia Neuenschwander -Chantal de Lichtervelde 52,86 %
9 EO 4C N = 420 11 50.00
10 EO 1S W-1 100 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A.5 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 44,91 %
11 EO 2P W-1 50 18.6 84.55
12 EO 2P E+1 -140 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A13 Jeannine Thys -Yolande Waerseggers 48,35 %
13 EO 5T E = -600 21.9 99.55
14 EO 3C S = 140 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A.6 Didier Collart -Claire Derieuw 44,41 %
15 EO 4P E-1 50 1.2 5.45
16 EO 4P N+2 480 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A14 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 45,89 %
17 EO 5C E-1 50 1.2 5.45
18 EO 2C N+1 140 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 7,95 %
A.7 Annie Legrand -Eliane de Ceuninck 53,47 %
19 EO 3P W-1 100 17.5 79.55
20 EO 4P W+1 -650 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A15 - 0,00 %
21 EO BYE 0 0.00
22 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.8 Anne Van den Berge -Pascale Nobels 49,22 %
23 EO 2P N+1 140 5 22.73
24 EO 2C W+1 -140 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A.9 Thierry Bollansee -Pascale Ortegat 68,75 %
27 EO 4P W-1 50 4 18.18
28 EO 3S W+1 -430 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
Total : 243,2 / 484 = 50,25 %
PAIRE a.8 Nadine Brabant -Pascale Bodart
A12 Grazia Neuenschwander -Chantal de Lichtervelde 52,86 %
1 EO 3S N+2 460 13.2 60.00
2 EO 4C W-1 50 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A13 Jeannine Thys -Yolande Waerseggers 48,35 %
5 EO 3S W+1 -430 19.7 89.55
6 EO 1S N+1 120 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A14 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 45,89 %
9 EO 4C N-1 -50 20.8 94.55
10 EO 2S W = -120 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A15 - 0,00 %
13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.8 Anne Van den Berge -Pascale Nobels 49,22 %
15 EO 4P E-1 50 1.2 5.45
16 EO 4P N+3 510 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
A.1 Annette Fobe -Sophie Tilemans 49,49 %
17 EO 5C E = -450 11 50.00
18 EO 2C N-1 -100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.9 Thierry Bollansee -Pascale Ortegat 68,75 %
19 EO 4C S+2 480 1.2 5.45
20 EO 4P W = -620 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 7,95 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 60,15 %
21 EO 4K W-1 50 15.4 70.00
22 EO 5K E-1 100 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A10 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 40,68 %
23 EO 3P N = 140 5 22.73
24 EO 2C W+2 -170 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.3 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 50,02 %
25 EO 3S N-1 -50 19 86.36
26 EO 3S S+1 630 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A11 Caroll Pucher -Sylviane Delbeke 46,38 %
27 EO 4P W = -420 18 81.82
28 EO 3S W+1 -430 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.4 Sandra Dallemagne -Marie Claire Vienne 45,32 %
29 EO 1S N+1 120 4.5 20.45
30 EO 4C S+1 450 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
Total : 237,0 / 484 = 48,97 %
PAIRE a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Jeannine Wanderpepen
A11 Caroll Pucher -Sylviane Delbeke 46,38 %
1 EO 6K N = 920 0.1 0.45
2 EO 4C W-1 50 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A12 Grazia Neuenschwander -Chantal de Lichtervelde 52,86 %
5 EO 3S W-2 100 3.4 15.45
6 EO 1S N = 90 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A13 Jeannine Thys -Yolande Waerseggers 48,35 %
9 EO 4C N = 420 11 50.00
10 EO 2S W = -120 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.6 Didier Collart -Claire Derieuw 44,41 %
11 EO 3T S = 110 11 50.00
12 EO 4C N-3 -300 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A14 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 45,89 %
13 EO 3K N-1 -100 5.5 25.00
14 EO 4C S-2 -100 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A.7 Annie Legrand -Eliane de Ceuninck 53,47 %
15 EO 4P E = -420 21.9 99.55
16 EO 4P N+2 480 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
A15 - 0,00 %
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.8 Anne Van den Berge -Pascale Nobels 49,22 %
19 EO 4C N = 420 5.5 25.00
20 EO 4P W+1 -650 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.1 Annette Fobe -Sophie Tilemans 49,49 %
21 EO 4C N = 620 7.7 35.00
22 EO 5K E-1 100 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A.9 Thierry Bollansee -Pascale Ortegat 68,75 %
23 EO 4P N-1 -100 13 59.09
24 EO 4C W-1 50 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 60,15 %
25 EO 2P S+2 170 14 63.64
26 EO 3S S+2 660 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A10 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 40,68 %
27 EO 4P W = -420 18 81.82
28 EO 3S E = -400 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
Total : 234,4 / 484 = 48,43 %
PAIRE a13 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm
A.7 Annie Legrand -Eliane de Ceuninck 53,47 %
1 EO 5K S+2 440 16.5 75.00
2 EO 4C W = -420 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 87,27 %
A15 - 0,00 %
3 EO BYE 0 0.00
4 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.8 Anne Van den Berge -Pascale Nobels 49,22 %
5 EO 3S W-2 100 3.4 15.45
6 EO 1S N+1 120 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 12,95 %
A.1 Annette Fobe -Sophie Tilemans 49,49 %
7 EO 3C S-1 -100 13.2 60.00
8 EO 2C W = -110 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A.9 Thierry Bollansee -Pascale Ortegat 68,75 %
9 EO 4C N+1 450 1.2 5.45
10 EO 2S W-1 100 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 12,95 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 60,15 %
11 EO 1S S+2 150 1.2 5.45
12 EO 2P E = -110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A.3 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 50,02 %
15 EO 2P E+2 -170 13.2 60.00
16 EO 4P N+2 480 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A.4 Sandra Dallemagne -Marie Claire Vienne 45,32 %
19 EO 4P W-2 200 12.1 55.00
20 EO 4P W = -620 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A.5 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 44,91 %
23 EO 4P N-1 -100 13 59.09
24 EO 3C W+1 -170 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A13 Jeannine Thys -Yolande Waerseggers 48,35 %
25 EO 4P S+1 450 4 18.18
26 EO 3S S+1 630 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.6 Didier Collart -Claire Derieuw 44,41 %
27 EO 4P W = -420 18 81.82
28 EO 3S E = -400 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A14 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 45,89 %
29 EO 4C S-3 -300 20.8 94.55
30 EO 4C S+1 450 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
Total : 233,2 / 484 = 48,18 %
PAIRE a15 Brigitte Velge -Marie J. de Wagheneire
A.8 Anne Van den Berge -Pascale Nobels 49,22 %
1 EO 4P S+3 510 5.5 25.00
2 EO 4C W-1 50 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A.1 Annette Fobe -Sophie Tilemans 49,49 %
3 EO 3S E-3 300 0.1 0.45
4 EO 1S S+1 120 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
A.9 Thierry Bollansee -Pascale Ortegat 68,75 %
5 EO 3S W = -400 15.4 70.00
6 EO 2K N-1 -50 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 60,15 %
7 EO 5TcE-2 500 3.4 15.45
8 EO 2C W-3 150 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
A10 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 40,68 %
9 EO 4C N-1 -50 20.8 94.55
10 EO 2KcN-1 -200 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
A.3 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 50,02 %
11 EO 2T E-2 100 13.2 60.00
12 EO 3C N = 140 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
A11 Caroll Pucher -Sylviane Delbeke 46,38 %
13 EO 3K N-1 -100 5.5 25.00
14 EO 1S N+1 120 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
A.4 Sandra Dallemagne -Marie Claire Vienne 45,32 %
15 EO 3P E+1 -170 13.2 60.00
16 EO 4P N+2 480 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A.5 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 44,91 %
19 EO 3P W-2 200 12.1 55.00
20 EO 4P W+1 -650 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A.6 Didier Collart -Claire Derieuw 44,41 %
23 EO 4P N-2 -200 21 95.45
24 EO 3C W = -140 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.7 Annie Legrand -Eliane de Ceuninck 53,47 %
27 EO 3P W = -140 10 45.45
28 EO 3S E = -400 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A15 - 0,00 %
29 EO BYE 0 0.00
30 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 221,5 / 484 = 45,76 %
PAIRE a.5 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory
A11 Caroll Pucher -Sylviane Delbeke 46,38 %
3 EO 2P W+1 -140 11 50.00
4 EO 1P E = -80 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A12 Grazia Neuenschwander -Chantal de Lichtervelde 52,86 %
7 EO 4T E-2 200 7.7 35.00
8 EO 3C W-2 100 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
A.5 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 44,91 %
9 EO 4C N = 420 11 50.00
10 EO 3S W+1 -630 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A13 Jeannine Thys -Yolande Waerseggers 48,35 %
11 EO 1S N+1 120 7.7 35.00
12 EO 3C N-1 -100 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 32,50 %
A.6 Didier Collart -Claire Derieuw 44,41 %
13 EO 3T E+2 -150 13.2 60.00
14 EO 2S N = 120 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A14 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 45,89 %
15 EO 3P E+1 -170 13.2 60.00
16 EO 6P N+1 1010 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
A.7 Annie Legrand -Eliane de Ceuninck 53,47 %
17 EO 5K W+1 -420 7.7 35.00
18 EO 2C N = 110 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
A15 - 0,00 %
19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.8 Anne Van den Berge -Pascale Nobels 49,22 %
21 EO 4C N-1 -100 19.7 89.55
22 EO 5K E-1 100 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A.1 Annette Fobe -Sophie Tilemans 49,49 %
23 EO 3S S+1 630 0 0.00
24 EO 3C W+1 -170 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.9 Thierry Bollansee -Pascale Ortegat 68,75 %
25 EO 4P S+1 450 4 18.18
26 EO 3S S+2 660 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
A10 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 40,68 %
29 EO 3C S-1 -100 15.4 70.00
30 EO 4C S+1 450 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
Total : 219,7 / 484 = 45,39 %
PAIRE a14 Elisabeth Harmant -Christiane Huby
A15 - 0,00 %
1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.8 Anne Van den Berge -Pascale Nobels 49,22 %
3 EO 2P W+2 -170 16.5 75.00
4 EO 1P E-1 100 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
A.1 Annette Fobe -Sophie Tilemans 49,49 %
5 EO 3S W-1 50 11 50.00
6 EO 2T W-1 100 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A.9 Thierry Bollansee -Pascale Ortegat 68,75 %
7 EO 5TcE-3 800 0.1 0.45
8 EO 2C W-2 100 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 60,15 %
9 EO 4C N = 420 11 50.00
10 EO 1S W+1 -120 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A10 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 40,68 %
11 EO 2S N = 120 7.7 35.00
12 EO 2S W-1 50 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.3 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 50,02 %
13 EO 4K N-3 -300 19.7 89.55
14 EO 3C S+1 170 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.4 Sandra Dallemagne -Marie Claire Vienne 45,32 %
17 EO 3S W+2 -460 15.4 70.00
18 EO 3C N-2 -200 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
A.5 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 44,91 %
21 EO 4C N = 620 7.7 35.00
22 EO 3S W-1 100 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A.6 Didier Collart -Claire Derieuw 44,41 %
25 EO 4P S+1 450 4 18.18
26 EO 3S S+1 630 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A14 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 45,89 %
27 EO 4P W = -420 18 81.82
28 EO 3S W = -400 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.7 Annie Legrand -Eliane de Ceuninck 53,47 %
29 EO 2P S+1 140 1.2 5.45
30 EO 4C S+1 450 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
Total : 210,8 / 484 = 43,55 %
PAIRE a12 Charles Velge -Sylviane Cornet
A14 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 45,89 %
1 EO 4P S+3 510 5.5 25.00
2 EO 3C W-1 50 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A.7 Annie Legrand -Eliane de Ceuninck 53,47 %
3 EO 2C N-1 -50 5.5 25.00
4 EO 2T S = 90 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A15 - 0,00 %
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.8 Anne Van den Berge -Pascale Nobels 49,22 %
7 EO 4CcS-2 -500 19.7 89.55
8 EO 1S W-2 100 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A.1 Annette Fobe -Sophie Tilemans 49,49 %
9 EO 4C N+1 450 1.2 5.45
10 EO 2S W-2 200 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 2,95 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 60,15 %
13 EO 3S W-2 200 1.2 5.45
14 EO 3C S = 140 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 12,95 %
A.3 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 50,02 %
17 EO 4P S-2 -100 4.5 20.45
18 EO 2C N+1 140 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 15,45 %
A.4 Sandra Dallemagne -Marie Claire Vienne 45,32 %
21 EO 4C N = 620 7.7 35.00
22 EO 3S E+1 -630 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A12 Grazia Neuenschwander -Chantal de Lichtervelde 52,86 %
23 EO 4P N-1 -100 13 59.09
24 EO 3C W-1 50 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.5 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 44,91 %
25 EO 3S N-4 -200 22 100.00
26 EO 3S S+2 660 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A13 Jeannine Thys -Yolande Waerseggers 48,35 %
27 EO 4P W-2 100 0 0.00
28 EO 3S E+1 -430 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.6 Didier Collart -Claire Derieuw 44,41 %
29 EO 3T N-1 -100 15.4 70.00
30 EO 4C S+1 450 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
Total : 186,4 / 484 = 38,51 %
|