B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 68,56 N10 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels
--- 2 57,39 N12 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli
--- 3 56,06 N.8 Colette Heerinckx -Eliane de Ceuninck
--- 4 53,22 N.9 Daniel Kuczynski -Annie Zeimes
--- 5 52,84 N.6 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles
--- 6 51,33 N.4 Myriam de Timary -Regine de Hemptinne
--- 7 49,43 N.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier
--- 8 49,05 N.7 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson
--- 9 48,67 N13 Serge Alard -Stan Tabor
--- 10 46,97 N11 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens
--- 11 46,02 N.1 Sophie Tilemans -Jannick Bekaert
--- 12 44,13 N.5 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry
--- 13 41,10 N.3 Sandra Dallemagne -Marie Claire Vienne
--- 14 35,23 N14 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 62,31 e11 Liliane Baptista -Michel Paquot
--- 2 58,71 e10 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed
--- 3 57,20 e.6 Gerard Cooreman -Dominique Sassen
--- 4 51,14 e.8 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren
--- 5 50,57 e.4 Simone Munsterhjelm -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
--- 6 50,57 e.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Grazia Neuenschwander
--- 7 50,57 e.3 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck
--- 8 49,81 e.2 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens
--- 9 49,62 e.1 Didier Collart -Marie J. de Wagheneire
--- 10 47,73 e13 Jean van Caloen -Marie Verhaegen
--- 11 47,35 e.9 Prisca Tondreau -Diane Deslignes
--- 12 41,86 e.7 Edith Close -Jan Sassen
--- 13 41,67 e14 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier
--- 14 40,91 e12 Marie Fr. Steininger -Andre Delacroix
PAIRE N10 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels
e.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Grazia Neuenschwander 50,57 %
1 NS 2S S-1 -50 9 40.91
2 NS 3S S+2 660 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
e.4 Simone Munsterhjelm -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 50,57 %
3 NS 3P N = 140 18 81.82
4 NS 4C S+2 680 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
e.2 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens 49,81 %
5 NS 4C N+1 650 17 77.27
6 NS 6P S = 980 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
e.1 Didier Collart -Marie J. de Wagheneire 49,62 %
7 NS 1S W-2 200 19 86.36
8 NS 1S W-1 50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
e14 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier 41,67 %
9 NS 3S S+2 460 19 86.36
10 NS 2K S+4 170 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
e13 Jean van Caloen -Marie Verhaegen 47,73 %
11 NS 3S W+1 -430 18 81.82
12 NS 1K E+5 -170 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
e12 Marie Fr. Steininger -Andre Delacroix 40,91 %
13 NS 2PcW-1 200 22 100.00
14 NS 3S N+2 460 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 100,00 %
e10 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 58,71 %
19 NS 3S S+2 460 11 50.00
20 NS 4T N-1 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
e.9 Prisca Tondreau -Diane Deslignes 47,35 %
21 NS 3S E-1 50 20 90.91
22 NS 5P E+1 -680 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
e.8 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 51,14 %
23 NS 2C S+2 170 15 68.18
24 NS 3S E = -400 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
e.7 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 41,86 %
25 NS 4P N = 420 12 54.55
26 NS 2C E-1 100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
e.6 Gerard Cooreman -Dominique Sassen 57,20 %
27 NS 5TcS-2 -300 0 0.00
28 NS 3S E+3 -490 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 6,82 %
Total : 362,0 / 528 = 68,56 %
PAIRE N12 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli
e.9 Prisca Tondreau -Diane Deslignes 47,35 %
1 NS 2S S-1 -50 9 40.91
2 NS 3S N+2 660 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
e.8 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 51,14 %
3 NS 4C W-2 200 22 100.00
4 NS 4C S = 620 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
e.7 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 41,86 %
5 NS 4C N+1 650 17 77.27
6 NS 7PcS-1 -100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
e.6 Gerard Cooreman -Dominique Sassen 57,20 %
7 NS 3P E-1 100 15 68.18
8 NS 2C W-2 100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
e.4 Simone Munsterhjelm -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 50,57 %
9 NS 2S N+2 180 4 18.18
10 NS 3K S+3 170 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
e.3 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 50,57 %
11 NS 3S W+1 -430 18 81.82
12 NS 3S W = -400 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
e.2 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens 49,81 %
13 NS 2C N-1 -100 5 22.73
14 NS 3S N+1 430 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
e.1 Didier Collart -Marie J. de Wagheneire 49,62 %
15 NS 3T E = -110 10 45.45
16 NS 1S N = 90 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
e14 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier 41,67 %
17 NS 6C E-1 50 20 90.91
18 NS 2K S+2 130 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
e12 Marie Fr. Steininger -Andre Delacroix 40,91 %
23 NS 3C N = 140 9 40.91
24 NS 3S E+2 -460 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
e11 Liliane Baptista -Michel Paquot 62,31 %
25 NS 4P N-1 -50 0 0.00
26 NS 4C E-3 300 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
e10 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 58,71 %
27 NS 4P W-1 50 8 36.36
28 NS 3S E = -400 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
Total : 303,0 / 528 = 57,39 %
PAIRE N.8 Colette Heerinckx -Eliane de Ceuninck
e14 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier 41,67 %
1 NS 2S S-1 -50 9 40.91
2 NS 3S S+2 660 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
e13 Jean van Caloen -Marie Verhaegen 47,73 %
3 NS 3P E+1 -170 2 9.09
4 NS 4P N+1 650 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
e12 Marie Fr. Steininger -Andre Delacroix 40,91 %
5 NS 4C N+1 650 17 77.27
6 NS 4P S+2 480 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
e11 Liliane Baptista -Michel Paquot 62,31 %
7 NS 2K W-1 100 15 68.18
8 NS 2C W-1 50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
e10 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 58,71 %
9 NS 3S N+2 460 19 86.36
10 NS 5K S = 600 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
e.8 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 51,14 %
15 NS 3T E-1 50 18 81.82
16 NS 1S N+1 120 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
e.7 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 41,86 %
17 NS 6C E-1 50 20 90.91
18 NS 3S S = 600 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 93,18 %
e.6 Gerard Cooreman -Dominique Sassen 57,20 %
19 NS 3S S = 400 1 4.55
20 NS 3P E-2 200 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
e.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Grazia Neuenschwander 50,57 %
21 NS 3S W = -400 4 18.18
22 NS 4P E+2 -680 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
e.4 Simone Munsterhjelm -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 50,57 %
23 NS 2C N+2 170 15 68.18
24 NS 3S E+3 -490 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
e.3 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 50,57 %
25 NS 4P N = 420 12 54.55
26 NS 1S W+1 -120 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
e.2 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens 49,81 %
27 NS 4P W-2 100 17 77.27
28 NS 3S W+3 -490 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
Total : 296,0 / 528 = 56,06 %
PAIRE N.9 Daniel Kuczynski -Annie Zeimes
e.3 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 50,57 %
1 NS 1S S+2 150 18 81.82
2 NS 4P N = 620 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
e.1 Didier Collart -Marie J. de Wagheneire 49,62 %
3 NS 3P N-1 -50 7 31.82
4 NS 4C S+1 650 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
e14 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier 41,67 %
5 NS 4C N+1 650 17 77.27
6 NS 6P S = 980 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
e13 Jean van Caloen -Marie Verhaegen 47,73 %
7 NS 3C W-3 300 22 100.00
8 NS 1P N = 80 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
e12 Marie Fr. Steininger -Andre Delacroix 40,91 %
9 NS 3S N+1 430 10 45.45
10 NS 2K S+2 130 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
e11 Liliane Baptista -Michel Paquot 62,31 %
11 NS 3S W+2 -460 9 40.91
12 NS 3S W+1 -430 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
e.9 Prisca Tondreau -Diane Deslignes 47,35 %
17 NS 4C E+1 -450 6 27.27
18 NS 3T W = -110 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
e.8 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 51,14 %
19 NS 3S S = 400 1 4.55
20 NS 4C S-1 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
e.7 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 41,86 %
21 NS 2C W = -110 15 68.18
22 NS 5P E+1 -680 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
e.6 Gerard Cooreman -Dominique Sassen 57,20 %
23 NS 3C N+1 170 15 68.18
24 NS 3S E+2 -460 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
e.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Grazia Neuenschwander 50,57 %
25 NS 4P N = 420 12 54.55
26 NS 1S W-1 100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
e.4 Simone Munsterhjelm -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 50,57 %
27 NS 4P W-1 50 8 36.36
28 NS 3S W+1 -430 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
Total : 281,0 / 528 = 53,22 %
PAIRE N.6 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles
e10 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 58,71 %
1 NS 3S S-3 -150 0 0.00
2 NS 3S S+1 630 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
e.9 Prisca Tondreau -Diane Deslignes 47,35 %
3 NS 3P N = 140 18 81.82
4 NS 4P N = 620 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
e.8 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 51,14 %
5 NS 4C N = 620 7 31.82
6 NS 6S N-3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
e.6 Gerard Cooreman -Dominique Sassen 57,20 %
11 NS 3S W+1 -430 18 81.82
12 NS 3S W+1 -430 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
e.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Grazia Neuenschwander 50,57 %
13 NS 2C N = 110 13 59.09
14 NS 3S S+1 430 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
e.4 Simone Munsterhjelm -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 50,57 %
15 NS 3P S-2 -200 4 18.18
16 NS 1S N+1 120 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
e.3 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 50,57 %
17 NS 4C E+1 -450 6 27.27
18 NS 3K S = 110 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
e.2 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens 49,81 %
19 NS 3S N+3 490 20 90.91
20 NS 5K E-2 200 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
e.1 Didier Collart -Marie J. de Wagheneire 49,62 %
21 NS 2C W = -110 15 68.18
22 NS 5P E+1 -680 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
e14 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier 41,67 %
23 NS 3CcN+1 930 22 100.00
24 NS 3S E+2 -460 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
e12 Marie Fr. Steininger -Andre Delacroix 40,91 %
25 NS 4P N = 420 12 54.55
26 NS 4C W-1 100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
e11 Liliane Baptista -Michel Paquot 62,31 %
27 NS 3P W-1 50 8 36.36
28 NS 3S W+2 -460 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
Total : 279,0 / 528 = 52,84 %
PAIRE N.4 Myriam de Timary -Regine de Hemptinne
e.6 Gerard Cooreman -Dominique Sassen 57,20 %
1 NS 2S S-1 -50 9 40.91
2 NS 3S S+1 630 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
e.4 Simone Munsterhjelm -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 50,57 %
7 NS 1S S-2 -200 0 0.00
8 NS 1S E-3 150 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
e.3 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 50,57 %
9 NS 3S S+2 460 19 86.36
10 NS 3S N-1 -100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
e.2 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens 49,81 %
11 NS 3S W+2 -460 9 40.91
12 NS 3S W+2 -460 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
e.1 Didier Collart -Marie J. de Wagheneire 49,62 %
13 NS 2C N = 110 13 59.09
14 NS 3S N+1 430 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
e14 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier 41,67 %
15 NS 2P S = 110 22 100.00
16 NS 1S N+1 120 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
e13 Jean van Caloen -Marie Verhaegen 47,73 %
17 NS 2C E+3 -200 16 72.73
18 NS 3K S = 110 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
e12 Marie Fr. Steininger -Andre Delacroix 40,91 %
19 NS 3S N+2 460 11 50.00
20 NS 4C S-2 -200 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
e10 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 58,71 %
21 NS 3S E = -400 4 18.18
22 NS 6P E-1 100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
e.9 Prisca Tondreau -Diane Deslignes 47,35 %
23 NS 2C N+1 140 9 40.91
24 NS 3S E+2 -460 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
e.8 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 51,14 %
25 NS 4P N = 420 12 54.55
26 NS 2C W = -110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
e.7 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 41,86 %
27 NS 4P W-1 50 8 36.36
28 NS 3S W+1 -430 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
Total : 271,0 / 528 = 51,33 %
PAIRE N.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier
e.2 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens 49,81 %
3 NS 4CcW = -790 0 0.00
4 NS 4P N = 620 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
e.1 Didier Collart -Marie J. de Wagheneire 49,62 %
5 NS 6C N-1 -100 1 4.55
6 NS 6P S = 980 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
e14 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier 41,67 %
7 NS 2P E = -110 11 50.00
8 NS 1S W-1 50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
e13 Jean van Caloen -Marie Verhaegen 47,73 %
9 NS 3S S+1 430 10 45.45
10 NS 3S N-1 -100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
e12 Marie Fr. Steininger -Andre Delacroix 40,91 %
11 NS 5K E = -400 22 100.00
12 NS 5T W+1 -420 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
e11 Liliane Baptista -Michel Paquot 62,31 %
13 NS 2C N+1 140 18 81.82
14 NS 3S N+1 430 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
e10 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 58,71 %
15 NS 2P S-1 -100 13 59.09
16 NS 1S N = 90 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
e.8 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 51,14 %
17 NS 4C E+1 -450 6 27.27
18 NS 3S S = 600 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
e.7 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 41,86 %
19 NS 3S N+2 460 11 50.00
20 NS 4C S = 620 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
e.6 Gerard Cooreman -Dominique Sassen 57,20 %
21 NS 3S E = -400 4 18.18
22 NS 5P E+1 -680 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
e.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Grazia Neuenschwander 50,57 %
23 NS 4C N-1 -100 5 22.73
24 NS 3S E+1 -430 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
e.4 Simone Munsterhjelm -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 50,57 %
25 NS 4P N = 420 12 54.55
26 NS 2C W+1 -140 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
Total : 261,0 / 528 = 49,43 %
PAIRE N.7 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson
e12 Marie Fr. Steininger -Andre Delacroix 40,91 %
1 NS 2S S = 120 16 72.73
2 NS 2P N+2 170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
e11 Liliane Baptista -Michel Paquot 62,31 %
3 NS 4P N-2 -100 4 18.18
4 NS 2C S+4 230 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
e10 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 58,71 %
5 NS 4C N+1 650 17 77.27
6 NS 4P S+2 480 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
e.9 Prisca Tondreau -Diane Deslignes 47,35 %
7 NS 1S W+2 -150 5 22.73
8 NS 1S W-2 100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
e.7 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 41,86 %
13 NS 1S S-1 -100 5 22.73
14 NS 3S S = 400 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
e.6 Gerard Cooreman -Dominique Sassen 57,20 %
15 NS 2T E+2 -130 7 31.82
16 NS 1S N = 90 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
e.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Grazia Neuenschwander 50,57 %
17 NS 5C E-1 50 20 90.91
18 NS 2K S+2 130 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
e.4 Simone Munsterhjelm -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 50,57 %
19 NS 3S N+2 460 11 50.00
20 NS 3C S+1 170 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
e.3 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 50,57 %
21 NS 2K E = -90 18 81.82
22 NS 4P E+2 -680 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
e.2 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens 49,81 %
23 NS 2CcN = 670 20 90.91
24 NS 3S E+1 -430 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
e.1 Didier Collart -Marie J. de Wagheneire 49,62 %
25 NS 4P N = 420 12 54.55
26 NS 2KcS-1 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
e13 Jean van Caloen -Marie Verhaegen 47,73 %
27 NS 3T S = 110 20 90.91
28 NS 3S E+3 -490 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
Total : 259,0 / 528 = 49,05 %
PAIRE N13 Serge Alard -Stan Tabor
e11 Liliane Baptista -Michel Paquot 62,31 %
1 NS 3S S = 400 21 95.45
2 NS 3S S+2 660 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
e10 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 58,71 %
3 NS 3P N-1 -50 7 31.82
4 NS 2P N+1 140 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
e.9 Prisca Tondreau -Diane Deslignes 47,35 %
5 NS 4C N+1 650 17 77.27
6 NS 6P S = 980 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
e.8 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 51,14 %
7 NS 2P E+1 -140 8 36.36
8 NS 1S W+1 -120 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
e.7 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 41,86 %
9 NS 3T S+2 150 1 4.55
10 NS 5K S = 600 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
e.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Grazia Neuenschwander 50,57 %
11 NS 3S W+3 -490 1 4.55
12 NS 3S W+2 -460 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
e.4 Simone Munsterhjelm -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 50,57 %
13 NS 1S N-1 -100 5 22.73
14 NS 3S N+1 430 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
e.3 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 50,57 %
15 NS 1S N-1 -100 13 59.09
16 NS 1S N+1 120 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
e.2 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens 49,81 %
17 NS 4C E = -420 14 63.64
18 NS 3K S = 110 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
e.1 Didier Collart -Marie J. de Wagheneire 49,62 %
19 NS 3S N+3 490 20 90.91
20 NS 3C S = 140 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
e13 Jean van Caloen -Marie Verhaegen 47,73 %
25 NS 4P N = 420 12 54.55
26 NS 2C E+1 -140 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
e12 Marie Fr. Steininger -Andre Delacroix 40,91 %
27 NS 3TcS+1 570 22 100.00
28 NS 3S E+3 -490 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
Total : 257,0 / 528 = 48,67 %
PAIRE N11 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens
e.7 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 41,86 %
1 NS 3S S = 400 21 95.45
2 NS 3S S+1 630 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
e.6 Gerard Cooreman -Dominique Sassen 57,20 %
3 NS 2P N = 110 12 54.55
4 NS 4P N = 620 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
e.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Grazia Neuenschwander 50,57 %
5 NS 4C N = 620 7 31.82
6 NS 6S N-2 -100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
e.3 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 50,57 %
7 NS 2P E = -110 11 50.00
8 NS 1S E-2 100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
e.2 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens 49,81 %
9 NS 4S N = 430 10 45.45
10 NS 3S N+2 660 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
e.1 Didier Collart -Marie J. de Wagheneire 49,62 %
11 NS 3S W+2 -460 9 40.91
12 NS 3S W+3 -490 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
e14 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier 41,67 %
13 NS 2C N = 110 13 59.09
14 NS 3S N+1 430 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
e13 Jean van Caloen -Marie Verhaegen 47,73 %
15 NS 3T E+1 -130 7 31.82
16 NS 1S N+1 120 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
e11 Liliane Baptista -Michel Paquot 62,31 %
21 NS 2S E = -120 11 50.00
22 NS 6P E = -1430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
e10 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 58,71 %
23 NS 2K W+3 -150 0 0.00
24 NS 3S E+3 -490 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 4,55 %
e.9 Prisca Tondreau -Diane Deslignes 47,35 %
25 NS 4P N = 420 12 54.55
26 NS 2K S = 90 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
e.8 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 51,14 %
27 NS 4P W-2 100 17 77.27
28 NS 3S W+2 -460 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
Total : 248,0 / 528 = 46,97 %
PAIRE N.1 Sophie Tilemans -Jannick Bekaert
e.1 Didier Collart -Marie J. de Wagheneire 49,62 %
1 NS 2S S-2 -100 2 9.09
2 NS 3S S+2 660 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
e14 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier 41,67 %
3 NS 2P N = 110 12 54.55
4 NS 2P N+2 170 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
e13 Jean van Caloen -Marie Verhaegen 47,73 %
5 NS 4C N = 620 7 31.82
6 NS 6P S = 980 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
e12 Marie Fr. Steininger -Andre Delacroix 40,91 %
7 NS 3S W-2 200 19 86.36
8 NS 1P N = 80 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
e11 Liliane Baptista -Michel Paquot 62,31 %
9 NS 3T N+2 150 1 4.55
10 NS 5K S-1 -100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 6,82 %
e10 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 58,71 %
11 NS 3S W+2 -460 9 40.91
12 NS 3S W+3 -490 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
e.9 Prisca Tondreau -Diane Deslignes 47,35 %
13 NS 2C N = 110 13 59.09
14 NS 3S S = 400 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
e.7 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 41,86 %
15 NS 3S W-1 50 18 81.82
16 NS 1S N+2 150 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
e.6 Gerard Cooreman -Dominique Sassen 57,20 %
17 NS 5C E = -450 6 27.27
18 NS 2K S+1 110 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
e.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Grazia Neuenschwander 50,57 %
19 NS 3S N+3 490 20 90.91
20 NS 4PcE = -790 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
e.4 Simone Munsterhjelm -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 50,57 %
21 NS 3S W-3 150 22 100.00
22 NS 4P E+2 -680 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
e.3 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 50,57 %
23 NS 3C N-1 -100 5 22.73
24 NS 3S E+2 -460 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
Total : 243,0 / 528 = 46,02 %
PAIRE N.5 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry
e.8 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 51,14 %
1 NS 2S S-1 -50 9 40.91
2 NS 3S N+1 630 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
e.7 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 41,86 %
3 NS 2P N = 110 12 54.55
4 NS 4P S-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
e.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Grazia Neuenschwander 50,57 %
9 NS 3S N+1 430 10 45.45
10 NS 5K S+1 620 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
e.4 Simone Munsterhjelm -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 50,57 %
11 NS 3S W+3 -490 1 4.55
12 NS 3T W+2 -150 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
e.3 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 50,57 %
13 NS 1S N+2 150 20 90.91
14 NS 3S N = 400 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
e.2 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens 49,81 %
15 NS 3PcS-2 -500 0 0.00
16 NS 1S N+1 120 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
e.1 Didier Collart -Marie J. de Wagheneire 49,62 %
17 NS 5C E = -450 6 27.27
18 NS 2S S+1 150 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
e14 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier 41,67 %
19 NS 3S N+2 460 11 50.00
20 NS 4C S-3 -300 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
e13 Jean van Caloen -Marie Verhaegen 47,73 %
21 NS 1S W+1 -120 11 50.00
22 NS 4P E+2 -680 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
e11 Liliane Baptista -Michel Paquot 62,31 %
23 NS 4K W = -130 2 9.09
24 NS 3S E+3 -490 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
e10 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 58,71 %
25 NS 4P N = 420 12 54.55
26 NS 2C W = -110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
e.9 Prisca Tondreau -Diane Deslignes 47,35 %
27 NS 4P W-1 50 8 36.36
28 NS 3S E-1 50 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
Total : 233,0 / 528 = 44,13 %
PAIRE N.3 Sandra Dallemagne -Marie Claire Vienne
e.3 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 50,57 %
5 NS 4C S = 620 7 31.82
6 NS 5C N+1 480 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
e.2 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens 49,81 %
7 NS 2P E+2 -170 2 9.09
8 NS 2C W-1 50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
e.1 Didier Collart -Marie J. de Wagheneire 49,62 %
9 NS 3S N+2 460 19 86.36
10 NS 3K S+3 170 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
e14 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier 41,67 %
11 NS 3S W+2 -460 9 40.91
12 NS 3S W+1 -430 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
e13 Jean van Caloen -Marie Verhaegen 47,73 %
13 NS 4C N-2 -200 0 0.00
14 NS 3S N+1 430 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
e12 Marie Fr. Steininger -Andre Delacroix 40,91 %
15 NS 4K N-4 -400 2 9.09
16 NS 1S N+1 120 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
e11 Liliane Baptista -Michel Paquot 62,31 %
17 NS 4C E+1 -450 6 27.27
18 NS 2K S+1 110 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
e.9 Prisca Tondreau -Diane Deslignes 47,35 %
19 NS 3S N+2 460 11 50.00
20 NS 4C S-2 -200 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
e.8 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 51,14 %
21 NS 1S W+2 -150 8 36.36
22 NS 5P E+1 -680 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
e.7 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 41,86 %
23 NS 2C N+2 170 15 68.18
24 NS 3S E+2 -460 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
e.6 Gerard Cooreman -Dominique Sassen 57,20 %
25 NS 4P N = 420 12 54.55
26 NS 2C W+1 -140 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
e.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Grazia Neuenschwander 50,57 %
27 NS 4P W-1 50 8 36.36
28 NS 3S W+2 -460 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
Total : 217,0 / 528 = 41,10 %
PAIRE N14 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse
e13 Jean van Caloen -Marie Verhaegen 47,73 %
1 NS 2S S-1 -50 9 40.91
2 NS 3S S+2 660 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
e12 Marie Fr. Steininger -Andre Delacroix 40,91 %
3 NS 3P N = 140 18 81.82
4 NS 4P N = 620 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
e11 Liliane Baptista -Michel Paquot 62,31 %
5 NS 6C N-1 -100 1 4.55
6 NS 6S N-2 -100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
e10 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 58,71 %
7 NS 2S W+1 -150 5 22.73
8 NS 1S W-1 50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
e.9 Prisca Tondreau -Diane Deslignes 47,35 %
9 NS 3S S+1 430 10 45.45
10 NS 2K S+2 130 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
e.8 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 51,14 %
11 NS 3S W+2 -460 9 40.91
12 NS 3S W+2 -460 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
e.6 Gerard Cooreman -Dominique Sassen 57,20 %
13 NS 2K S-1 -100 5 22.73
14 NS 3S S+1 430 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
e.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Grazia Neuenschwander 50,57 %
15 NS 3T E-1 50 18 81.82
16 NS 2S S-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
e.4 Simone Munsterhjelm -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 50,57 %
17 NS 4C E+1 -450 6 27.27
18 NS 1C W+2 -140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
e.3 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 50,57 %
19 NS 3S S+1 430 4 18.18
20 NS 4C S-2 -200 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
e.2 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens 49,81 %
21 NS 3S W+1 -430 0 0.00
22 NS 4P E+2 -680 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
e14 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier 41,67 %
27 NS 4C W-1 50 8 36.36
28 NS 3S E+2 -460 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
Total : 186,0 / 528 = 35,23 %
PAIRE e11 Liliane Baptista -Michel Paquot
N13 Serge Alard -Stan Tabor 48,67 %
1 EO 3S S = 400 1 4.55
2 EO 3S S+2 660 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
N.7 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 49,05 %
3 EO 4P N-2 -100 18 81.82
4 EO 2C S+4 230 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
N14 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 35,23 %
5 EO 6C N-1 -100 21 95.45
6 EO 6S N-2 -100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
N.8 Colette Heerinckx -Eliane de Ceuninck 56,06 %
7 EO 2K W-1 100 7 31.82
8 EO 2C W-1 50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
N.1 Sophie Tilemans -Jannick Bekaert 46,02 %
9 EO 3T N+2 150 21 95.45
10 EO 5K S-1 -100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 93,18 %
N.9 Daniel Kuczynski -Annie Zeimes 53,22 %
11 EO 3S W+2 -460 13 59.09
12 EO 3S W+1 -430 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
N.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 49,43 %
13 EO 2C N+1 140 4 18.18
14 EO 3S N+1 430 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
N.3 Sandra Dallemagne -Marie Claire Vienne 41,10 %
17 EO 4C E+1 -450 16 72.73
18 EO 2K S+1 110 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
N11 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 46,97 %
21 EO 2S E = -120 11 50.00
22 EO 6P E = -1430 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
N.5 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry 44,13 %
23 EO 4K W = -130 20 90.91
24 EO 3S E+3 -490 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
N12 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 57,39 %
25 EO 4P N-1 -50 22 100.00
26 EO 4C E-3 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
N.6 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 52,84 %
27 EO 3P W-1 50 14 63.64
28 EO 3S W+2 -460 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
Total : 329,0 / 528 = 62,31 %
PAIRE e10 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed
N.6 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 52,84 %
1 EO 3S S-3 -150 22 100.00
2 EO 3S S+1 630 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
N13 Serge Alard -Stan Tabor 48,67 %
3 EO 3P N-1 -50 15 68.18
4 EO 2P N+1 140 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
N.7 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 49,05 %
5 EO 4C N+1 650 5 22.73
6 EO 4P S+2 480 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
N14 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 35,23 %
7 EO 2S W+1 -150 17 77.27
8 EO 1S W-1 50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
N.8 Colette Heerinckx -Eliane de Ceuninck 56,06 %
9 EO 3S N+2 460 3 13.64
10 EO 5K S = 600 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
N.1 Sophie Tilemans -Jannick Bekaert 46,02 %
11 EO 3S W+2 -460 13 59.09
12 EO 3S W+3 -490 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
N.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 49,43 %
15 EO 2P S-1 -100 9 40.91
16 EO 1S N = 90 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
N10 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 68,56 %
19 EO 3S S+2 460 11 50.00
20 EO 4T N-1 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
N.4 Myriam de Timary -Regine de Hemptinne 51,33 %
21 EO 3S E = -400 18 81.82
22 EO 6P E-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
N11 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 46,97 %
23 EO 2K W+3 -150 22 100.00
24 EO 3S E+3 -490 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 95,45 %
N.5 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry 44,13 %
25 EO 4P N = 420 10 45.45
26 EO 2C W = -110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
N12 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 57,39 %
27 EO 4P W-1 50 14 63.64
28 EO 3S E = -400 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
Total : 310,0 / 528 = 58,71 %
PAIRE e.6 Gerard Cooreman -Dominique Sassen
N.4 Myriam de Timary -Regine de Hemptinne 51,33 %
1 EO 2S S-1 -50 13 59.09
2 EO 3S S+1 630 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
N11 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 46,97 %
3 EO 2P N = 110 10 45.45
4 EO 4P N = 620 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
N12 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 57,39 %
7 EO 3P E-1 100 7 31.82
8 EO 2C W-2 100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
N.6 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 52,84 %
11 EO 3S W+1 -430 4 18.18
12 EO 3S W+1 -430 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
N14 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 35,23 %
13 EO 2K S-1 -100 17 77.27
14 EO 3S S+1 430 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
N.7 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 49,05 %
15 EO 2T E+2 -130 15 68.18
16 EO 1S N = 90 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
N.1 Sophie Tilemans -Jannick Bekaert 46,02 %
17 EO 5C E = -450 16 72.73
18 EO 2K S+1 110 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
N.8 Colette Heerinckx -Eliane de Ceuninck 56,06 %
19 EO 3S S = 400 21 95.45
20 EO 3P E-2 200 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
N.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 49,43 %
21 EO 3S E = -400 18 81.82
22 EO 5P E+1 -680 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
N.9 Daniel Kuczynski -Annie Zeimes 53,22 %
23 EO 3C N+1 170 7 31.82
24 EO 3S E+2 -460 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
N.3 Sandra Dallemagne -Marie Claire Vienne 41,10 %
25 EO 4P N = 420 10 45.45
26 EO 2C W+1 -140 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
N10 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 68,56 %
27 EO 5TcS-2 -300 22 100.00
28 EO 3S E+3 -490 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 93,18 %
Total : 302,0 / 528 = 57,20 %
PAIRE e.8 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren
N.5 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry 44,13 %
1 EO 2S S-1 -50 13 59.09
2 EO 3S N+1 630 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
N12 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 57,39 %
3 EO 4C W-2 200 0 0.00
4 EO 4C S = 620 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
N.6 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 52,84 %
5 EO 4C N = 620 15 68.18
6 EO 6S N-3 -150 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
N13 Serge Alard -Stan Tabor 48,67 %
7 EO 2P E+1 -140 14 63.64
8 EO 1S W+1 -120 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
N14 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 35,23 %
11 EO 3S W+2 -460 13 59.09
12 EO 3S W+2 -460 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
N.8 Colette Heerinckx -Eliane de Ceuninck 56,06 %
15 EO 3T E-1 50 4 18.18
16 EO 1S N+1 120 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
N.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 49,43 %
17 EO 4C E+1 -450 16 72.73
18 EO 3S S = 600 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
N.9 Daniel Kuczynski -Annie Zeimes 53,22 %
19 EO 3S S = 400 21 95.45
20 EO 4C S-1 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
N.3 Sandra Dallemagne -Marie Claire Vienne 41,10 %
21 EO 1S W+2 -150 14 63.64
22 EO 5P E+1 -680 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
N10 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 68,56 %
23 EO 2C S+2 170 7 31.82
24 EO 3S E = -400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
N.4 Myriam de Timary -Regine de Hemptinne 51,33 %
25 EO 4P N = 420 10 45.45
26 EO 2C W = -110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
N11 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 46,97 %
27 EO 4P W-2 100 5 22.73
28 EO 3S W+2 -460 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
Total : 270,0 / 528 = 51,14 %
PAIRE e.4 Simone Munsterhjelm -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
N10 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 68,56 %
3 EO 3P N = 140 4 18.18
4 EO 4C S+2 680 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
N.4 Myriam de Timary -Regine de Hemptinne 51,33 %
7 EO 1S S-2 -200 22 100.00
8 EO 1S E-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
N12 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 57,39 %
9 EO 2S N+2 180 18 81.82
10 EO 3K S+3 170 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
N.5 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry 44,13 %
11 EO 3S W+3 -490 21 95.45
12 EO 3T W+2 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
N13 Serge Alard -Stan Tabor 48,67 %
13 EO 1S N-1 -100 17 77.27
14 EO 3S N+1 430 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
N.6 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 52,84 %
15 EO 3P S-2 -200 18 81.82
16 EO 1S N+1 120 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
N14 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 35,23 %
17 EO 4C E+1 -450 16 72.73
18 EO 1C W+2 -140 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
N.7 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 49,05 %
19 EO 3S N+2 460 11 50.00
20 EO 3C S+1 170 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
N.1 Sophie Tilemans -Jannick Bekaert 46,02 %
21 EO 3S W-3 150 0 0.00
22 EO 4P E+2 -680 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
N.8 Colette Heerinckx -Eliane de Ceuninck 56,06 %
23 EO 2C N+2 170 7 31.82
24 EO 3S E+3 -490 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
N.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 49,43 %
25 EO 4P N = 420 10 45.45
26 EO 2C W+1 -140 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
N.9 Daniel Kuczynski -Annie Zeimes 53,22 %
27 EO 4P W-1 50 14 63.64
28 EO 3S W+1 -430 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
Total : 267,0 / 528 = 50,57 %
PAIRE e.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Grazia Neuenschwander
N10 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 68,56 %
1 EO 2S S-1 -50 13 59.09
2 EO 3S S+2 660 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
N11 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 46,97 %
5 EO 4C N = 620 15 68.18
6 EO 6S N-2 -100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
N.5 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry 44,13 %
9 EO 3S N+1 430 12 54.55
10 EO 5K S+1 620 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
N13 Serge Alard -Stan Tabor 48,67 %
11 EO 3S W+3 -490 21 95.45
12 EO 3S W+2 -460 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
N.6 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 52,84 %
13 EO 2C N = 110 9 40.91
14 EO 3S S+1 430 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
N14 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 35,23 %
15 EO 3T E-1 50 4 18.18
16 EO 2S S-1 -50 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
N.7 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 49,05 %
17 EO 5C E-1 50 2 9.09
18 EO 2K S+2 130 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
N.1 Sophie Tilemans -Jannick Bekaert 46,02 %
19 EO 3S N+3 490 2 9.09
20 EO 4PcE = -790 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
N.8 Colette Heerinckx -Eliane de Ceuninck 56,06 %
21 EO 3S W = -400 18 81.82
22 EO 4P E+2 -680 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
N.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 49,43 %
23 EO 4C N-1 -100 17 77.27
24 EO 3S E+1 -430 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
N.9 Daniel Kuczynski -Annie Zeimes 53,22 %
25 EO 4P N = 420 10 45.45
26 EO 1S W-1 100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
N.3 Sandra Dallemagne -Marie Claire Vienne 41,10 %
27 EO 4P W-1 50 14 63.64
28 EO 3S W+2 -460 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
Total : 267,0 / 528 = 50,57 %
PAIRE e.3 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck
N.9 Daniel Kuczynski -Annie Zeimes 53,22 %
1 EO 1S S+2 150 4 18.18
2 EO 4P N = 620 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
N.3 Sandra Dallemagne -Marie Claire Vienne 41,10 %
5 EO 4C S = 620 15 68.18
6 EO 5C N+1 480 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
N11 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 46,97 %
7 EO 2P E = -110 11 50.00
8 EO 1S E-2 100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
N.4 Myriam de Timary -Regine de Hemptinne 51,33 %
9 EO 3S S+2 460 3 13.64
10 EO 3S N-1 -100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
N12 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 57,39 %
11 EO 3S W+1 -430 4 18.18
12 EO 3S W = -400 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
N.5 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry 44,13 %
13 EO 1S N+2 150 2 9.09
14 EO 3S N = 400 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
N13 Serge Alard -Stan Tabor 48,67 %
15 EO 1S N-1 -100 9 40.91
16 EO 1S N+1 120 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
N.6 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 52,84 %
17 EO 4C E+1 -450 16 72.73
18 EO 3K S = 110 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
N14 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 35,23 %
19 EO 3S S+1 430 18 81.82
20 EO 4C S-2 -200 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
N.7 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 49,05 %
21 EO 2K E = -90 4 18.18
22 EO 4P E+2 -680 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
N.1 Sophie Tilemans -Jannick Bekaert 46,02 %
23 EO 3C N-1 -100 17 77.27
24 EO 3S E+2 -460 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
N.8 Colette Heerinckx -Eliane de Ceuninck 56,06 %
25 EO 4P N = 420 10 45.45
26 EO 1S W+1 -120 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
Total : 267,0 / 528 = 50,57 %
PAIRE e.2 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens
N.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 49,43 %
3 EO 4CcW = -790 22 100.00
4 EO 4P N = 620 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
N10 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 68,56 %
5 EO 4C N+1 650 5 22.73
6 EO 6P S = 980 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
N.3 Sandra Dallemagne -Marie Claire Vienne 41,10 %
7 EO 2P E+2 -170 20 90.91
8 EO 2C W-1 50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
N11 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 46,97 %
9 EO 4S N = 430 12 54.55
10 EO 3S N+2 660 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
N.4 Myriam de Timary -Regine de Hemptinne 51,33 %
11 EO 3S W+2 -460 13 59.09
12 EO 3S W+2 -460 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
N12 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 57,39 %
13 EO 2C N-1 -100 17 77.27
14 EO 3S N+1 430 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
N.5 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry 44,13 %
15 EO 3PcS-2 -500 22 100.00
16 EO 1S N+1 120 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
N13 Serge Alard -Stan Tabor 48,67 %
17 EO 4C E = -420 8 36.36
18 EO 3K S = 110 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
N.6 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 52,84 %
19 EO 3S N+3 490 2 9.09
20 EO 5K E-2 200 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
N14 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 35,23 %
21 EO 3S W+1 -430 22 100.00
22 EO 4P E+2 -680 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
N.7 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 49,05 %
23 EO 2CcN = 670 2 9.09
24 EO 3S E+1 -430 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
N.8 Colette Heerinckx -Eliane de Ceuninck 56,06 %
27 EO 4P W-2 100 5 22.73
28 EO 3S W+3 -490 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
Total : 263,0 / 528 = 49,81 %
PAIRE e.1 Didier Collart -Marie J. de Wagheneire
N.1 Sophie Tilemans -Jannick Bekaert 46,02 %
1 EO 2S S-2 -100 20 90.91
2 EO 3S S+2 660 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
N.9 Daniel Kuczynski -Annie Zeimes 53,22 %
3 EO 3P N-1 -50 15 68.18
4 EO 4C S+1 650 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
N.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 49,43 %
5 EO 6C N-1 -100 21 95.45
6 EO 6P S = 980 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
N10 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 68,56 %
7 EO 1S W-2 200 3 13.64
8 EO 1S W-1 50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
N.3 Sandra Dallemagne -Marie Claire Vienne 41,10 %
9 EO 3S N+2 460 3 13.64
10 EO 3K S+3 170 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
N11 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 46,97 %
11 EO 3S W+2 -460 13 59.09
12 EO 3S W+3 -490 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
N.4 Myriam de Timary -Regine de Hemptinne 51,33 %
13 EO 2C N = 110 9 40.91
14 EO 3S N+1 430 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
N12 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 57,39 %
15 EO 3T E = -110 12 54.55
16 EO 1S N = 90 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
N.5 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry 44,13 %
17 EO 5C E = -450 16 72.73
18 EO 2S S+1 150 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
N13 Serge Alard -Stan Tabor 48,67 %
19 EO 3S N+3 490 2 9.09
20 EO 3C S = 140 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
N.6 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 52,84 %
21 EO 2C W = -110 7 31.82
22 EO 5P E+1 -680 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
N.7 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 49,05 %
25 EO 4P N = 420 10 45.45
26 EO 2KcS-1 -200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
Total : 262,0 / 528 = 49,62 %
PAIRE e13 Jean van Caloen -Marie Verhaegen
N14 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 35,23 %
1 EO 2S S-1 -50 13 59.09
2 EO 3S S+2 660 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
N.8 Colette Heerinckx -Eliane de Ceuninck 56,06 %
3 EO 3P E+1 -170 20 90.91
4 EO 4P N+1 650 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
N.1 Sophie Tilemans -Jannick Bekaert 46,02 %
5 EO 4C N = 620 15 68.18
6 EO 6P S = 980 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
N.9 Daniel Kuczynski -Annie Zeimes 53,22 %
7 EO 3C W-3 300 0 0.00
8 EO 1P N = 80 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
N.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 49,43 %
9 EO 3S S+1 430 12 54.55
10 EO 3S N-1 -100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
N10 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 68,56 %
11 EO 3S W+1 -430 4 18.18
12 EO 1K E+5 -170 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
N.3 Sandra Dallemagne -Marie Claire Vienne 41,10 %
13 EO 4C N-2 -200 22 100.00
14 EO 3S N+1 430 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
N11 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 46,97 %
15 EO 3T E+1 -130 15 68.18
16 EO 1S N+1 120 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
N.4 Myriam de Timary -Regine de Hemptinne 51,33 %
17 EO 2C E+3 -200 6 27.27
18 EO 3K S = 110 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
N.5 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry 44,13 %
21 EO 1S W+1 -120 11 50.00
22 EO 4P E+2 -680 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
N13 Serge Alard -Stan Tabor 48,67 %
25 EO 4P N = 420 10 45.45
26 EO 2C E+1 -140 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
N.7 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 49,05 %
27 EO 3T S = 110 2 9.09
28 EO 3S E+3 -490 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
Total : 252,0 / 528 = 47,73 %
PAIRE e.9 Prisca Tondreau -Diane Deslignes
N12 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 57,39 %
1 EO 2S S-1 -50 13 59.09
2 EO 3S N+2 660 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
N.6 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 52,84 %
3 EO 3P N = 140 4 18.18
4 EO 4P N = 620 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
N13 Serge Alard -Stan Tabor 48,67 %
5 EO 4C N+1 650 5 22.73
6 EO 6P S = 980 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
N.7 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 49,05 %
7 EO 1S W+2 -150 17 77.27
8 EO 1S W-2 100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
N14 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 35,23 %
9 EO 3S S+1 430 12 54.55
10 EO 2K S+2 130 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
N.1 Sophie Tilemans -Jannick Bekaert 46,02 %
13 EO 2C N = 110 9 40.91
14 EO 3S S = 400 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
N.9 Daniel Kuczynski -Annie Zeimes 53,22 %
17 EO 4C E+1 -450 16 72.73
18 EO 3T W = -110 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
N.3 Sandra Dallemagne -Marie Claire Vienne 41,10 %
19 EO 3S N+2 460 11 50.00
20 EO 4C S-2 -200 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
N10 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 68,56 %
21 EO 3S E-1 50 2 9.09
22 EO 5P E+1 -680 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
N.4 Myriam de Timary -Regine de Hemptinne 51,33 %
23 EO 2C N+1 140 13 59.09
24 EO 3S E+2 -460 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
N11 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 46,97 %
25 EO 4P N = 420 10 45.45
26 EO 2K S = 90 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
N.5 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry 44,13 %
27 EO 4P W-1 50 14 63.64
28 EO 3S E-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
Total : 250,0 / 528 = 47,35 %
PAIRE e.7 Edith Close -Jan Sassen
N11 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 46,97 %
1 EO 3S S = 400 1 4.55
2 EO 3S S+1 630 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
N.5 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry 44,13 %
3 EO 2P N = 110 10 45.45
4 EO 4P S-1 -100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
N12 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 57,39 %
5 EO 4C N+1 650 5 22.73
6 EO 7PcS-1 -100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
N13 Serge Alard -Stan Tabor 48,67 %
9 EO 3T S+2 150 21 95.45
10 EO 5K S = 600 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
N.7 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 49,05 %
13 EO 1S S-1 -100 17 77.27
14 EO 3S S = 400 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
N.1 Sophie Tilemans -Jannick Bekaert 46,02 %
15 EO 3S W-1 50 4 18.18
16 EO 1S N+2 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
N.8 Colette Heerinckx -Eliane de Ceuninck 56,06 %
17 EO 6C E-1 50 2 9.09
18 EO 3S S = 600 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 6,82 %
N.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 49,43 %
19 EO 3S N+2 460 11 50.00
20 EO 4C S = 620 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
N.9 Daniel Kuczynski -Annie Zeimes 53,22 %
21 EO 2C W = -110 7 31.82
22 EO 5P E+1 -680 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
N.3 Sandra Dallemagne -Marie Claire Vienne 41,10 %
23 EO 2C N+2 170 7 31.82
24 EO 3S E+2 -460 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
N10 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 68,56 %
25 EO 4P N = 420 10 45.45
26 EO 2C E-1 100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
N.4 Myriam de Timary -Regine de Hemptinne 51,33 %
27 EO 4P W-1 50 14 63.64
28 EO 3S W+1 -430 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
Total : 221,0 / 528 = 41,86 %
PAIRE e14 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier
N.8 Colette Heerinckx -Eliane de Ceuninck 56,06 %
1 EO 2S S-1 -50 13 59.09
2 EO 3S S+2 660 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
N.1 Sophie Tilemans -Jannick Bekaert 46,02 %
3 EO 2P N = 110 10 45.45
4 EO 2P N+2 170 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
N.9 Daniel Kuczynski -Annie Zeimes 53,22 %
5 EO 4C N+1 650 5 22.73
6 EO 6P S = 980 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
N.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 49,43 %
7 EO 2P E = -110 11 50.00
8 EO 1S W-1 50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
N10 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 68,56 %
9 EO 3S S+2 460 3 13.64
10 EO 2K S+4 170 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
N.3 Sandra Dallemagne -Marie Claire Vienne 41,10 %
11 EO 3S W+2 -460 13 59.09
12 EO 3S W+1 -430 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
N11 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 46,97 %
13 EO 2C N = 110 9 40.91
14 EO 3S N+1 430 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
N.4 Myriam de Timary -Regine de Hemptinne 51,33 %
15 EO 2P S = 110 0 0.00
16 EO 1S N+1 120 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
N12 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 57,39 %
17 EO 6C E-1 50 2 9.09
18 EO 2K S+2 130 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
N.5 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry 44,13 %
19 EO 3S N+2 460 11 50.00
20 EO 4C S-3 -300 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
N.6 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 52,84 %
23 EO 3CcN+1 930 0 0.00
24 EO 3S E+2 -460 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
N14 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 35,23 %
27 EO 4C W-1 50 14 63.64
28 EO 3S E+2 -460 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
Total : 220,0 / 528 = 41,67 %
PAIRE e12 Marie Fr. Steininger -Andre Delacroix
N.7 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 49,05 %
1 EO 2S S = 120 6 27.27
2 EO 2P N+2 170 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
N14 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 35,23 %
3 EO 3P N = 140 4 18.18
4 EO 4P N = 620 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
N.8 Colette Heerinckx -Eliane de Ceuninck 56,06 %
5 EO 4C N+1 650 5 22.73
6 EO 4P S+2 480 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
N.1 Sophie Tilemans -Jannick Bekaert 46,02 %
7 EO 3S W-2 200 3 13.64
8 EO 1P N = 80 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
N.9 Daniel Kuczynski -Annie Zeimes 53,22 %
9 EO 3S N+1 430 12 54.55
10 EO 2K S+2 130 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
N.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 49,43 %
11 EO 5K E = -400 0 0.00
12 EO 5T W+1 -420 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
N10 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 68,56 %
13 EO 2PcW-1 200 0 0.00
14 EO 3S N+2 460 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
N.3 Sandra Dallemagne -Marie Claire Vienne 41,10 %
15 EO 4K N-4 -400 20 90.91
16 EO 1S N+1 120 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
N.4 Myriam de Timary -Regine de Hemptinne 51,33 %
19 EO 3S N+2 460 11 50.00
20 EO 4C S-2 -200 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
N12 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 57,39 %
23 EO 3C N = 140 13 59.09
24 EO 3S E+2 -460 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
N.6 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 52,84 %
25 EO 4P N = 420 10 45.45
26 EO 4C W-1 100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
N13 Serge Alard -Stan Tabor 48,67 %
27 EO 3TcS+1 570 0 0.00
28 EO 3S E+3 -490 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
Total : 216,0 / 528 = 40,91 %
|