B.C.O.B.
Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 70,41 A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier
--- 2 59,67 A11 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory
--- 3 55,81 A.9 Jacques Podevyn -Francine Belet
--- 4 54,90 A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh
--- 5 53,12 A.5 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier
--- 6 50,19 A13 Marianne Falla -Patrick Gilles
--- 7 48,90 A.1 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse
--- 8 47,38 A10 Claire Rolin -Efthalia Bogaerts
--- 9 47,29 A12 Annie Zeimes -Michel Lievens
--- 10 45,62 A.3 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst
--- 11 43,90 A.8 Teresa Dekoster -Philippe van der Gracht
--- 12 40,74 A.4 Alan Beckman -Liliane Baptista
--- 13 32,02 A.6 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 63,66 a.2 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain
--- 2 57,84 a11 Chris Oostens -Catherine de Moffarts
--- 3 54,81 a10 Jean van Caloen -Marc Antoine de Halloy
--- 4 52,37 a.8 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Prisca Tondreau
--- 5 51,14 a.4 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger
--- 6 51,06 a12 Martine Zens -Noelle Fosse
--- 7 50,97 a.9 Nicole Leclere -Madeleine Gabriel
--- 8 49,60 a.5 Danielle Wybauw -Helene Schyns
--- 9 46,27 a.1 Paul Henricot -Danielle Henricot
--- 10 44,72 a.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Dilva Haym
--- 11 39,77 a.6 Philippe d'Hoop -Juan del Marmol
--- 12 38,07 a.3 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart
--- 13 0,00 a13 -
PAIRE A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 63,66 %
3 NS 4P S = 420 18.6 84.55
4 NS 3C N+1 170 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
a.1 Paul Henricot -Danielle Henricot 46,27 %
5 NS 2C N = 110 15.4 70.00
6 NS 1S W-3 300 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
a13 - 0,00 %
7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a12 Martine Zens -Noelle Fosse 51,06 %
9 NS 4C N+1 450 18.6 84.55
10 NS 2S W+1 -150 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a11 Chris Oostens -Catherine de Moffarts 57,84 %
11 NS 4T E-3 150 15.4 70.00
12 NS 2S S = 120 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
a10 Jean van Caloen -Marc Antoine de Halloy 54,81 %
13 NS 1S N+1 120 18.6 84.55
14 NS 2C S+1 140 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 82,05 %
a.9 Nicole Leclere -Madeleine Gabriel 50,97 %
15 NS 2C W = -110 4.5 20.45
16 NS 1K N-1 -50 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.8 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Prisca Tondreau 52,37 %
17 NS 1S E-1 50 2.3 10.45
18 NS 1S S+1 120 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Dilva Haym 44,72 %
19 NS 2P N+1 140 20.8 94.55
20 NS 3C N = 140 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 94,55 %
a.6 Philippe d'Hoop -Juan del Marmol 39,77 %
21 NS 2S W-3 150 22 100.00
22 NS 2P S+2 170 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
a.5 Danielle Wybauw -Helene Schyns 49,60 %
23 NS 2S W+1 -150 13.2 60.00
24 NS 6S W = -990 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.4 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 51,14 %
25 NS 2P S+2 170 13.2 60.00
26 NS 4P E-1 100 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
Total : 340,8 / 484 = 70,41 %
PAIRE A11 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory
a.8 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Prisca Tondreau 52,37 %
1 NS 3S W+2 -460 7.7 35.00
2 NS 3K N = 110 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
a.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Dilva Haym 44,72 %
3 NS 4PcS-1 -100 1.2 5.45
4 NS 4TcW-1 200 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a.6 Philippe d'Hoop -Juan del Marmol 39,77 %
5 NS 2C N = 110 15.4 70.00
6 NS 2P S = 110 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a.5 Danielle Wybauw -Helene Schyns 49,60 %
7 NS 2C E+2 -170 16.5 75.00
8 NS 3P S+1 170 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a.4 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 51,14 %
9 NS 4C S+1 450 18.6 84.55
10 NS 2S W+1 -150 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a.3 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 38,07 %
11 NS 4C S = 420 20.8 94.55
12 NS 2K W-2 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 63,66 %
13 NS 2P W = -110 12.1 55.00
14 NS 2S N = 120 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.1 Paul Henricot -Danielle Henricot 46,27 %
15 NS 3S W-2 100 20.8 94.55
16 NS 1P E+2 -140 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a13 - 0,00 %
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a11 Chris Oostens -Catherine de Moffarts 57,84 %
21 NS 2S W-1 50 9 40.91
22 NS 2P S = 110 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a10 Jean van Caloen -Marc Antoine de Halloy 54,81 %
23 NS 2S W+2 -180 6.6 30.00
24 NS 6S W-1 50 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
a.9 Nicole Leclere -Madeleine Gabriel 50,97 %
25 NS 2P N+2 170 13.2 60.00
26 NS 3P E+1 -170 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
Total : 288,8 / 484 = 59,67 %
PAIRE A.9 Jacques Podevyn -Francine Belet
a.4 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 51,14 %
1 NS 3S W+1 -430 18.6 84.55
2 NS 2P W+1 -140 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a.3 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 38,07 %
3 NS 4P S = 420 18.6 84.55
4 NS 4C N = 620 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 92,05 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 63,66 %
5 NS 3C N-2 -200 1.2 5.45
6 NS 1S E = -90 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
a.1 Paul Henricot -Danielle Henricot 46,27 %
7 NS 4C W = -620 6.6 30.00
8 NS 3P S+1 170 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
a13 - 0,00 %
9 NS BYE 0 0.00
10 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a12 Martine Zens -Noelle Fosse 51,06 %
11 NS 3C S = 140 12.1 55.00
12 NS 3K W-3 150 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a11 Chris Oostens -Catherine de Moffarts 57,84 %
13 NS 1S N-2 -200 4.5 20.45
14 NS 3P E = -140 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
a.9 Nicole Leclere -Madeleine Gabriel 50,97 %
17 NS 2C E-2 100 7.7 35.00
18 NS 2K E = -90 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a.8 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Prisca Tondreau 52,37 %
19 NS 2P N = 110 12.1 55.00
20 NS 3C S = 140 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Dilva Haym 44,72 %
21 NS 1S W-2 100 17 77.27
22 NS 3S E-2 200 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
a.6 Philippe d'Hoop -Juan del Marmol 39,77 %
23 NS 3S W-1 100 21.9 99.55
24 NS 3S W+2 -460 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
a.5 Danielle Wybauw -Helene Schyns 49,60 %
25 NS 2P S+2 170 13.2 60.00
26 NS 4P E-1 100 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
Total : 270,1 / 484 = 55,81 %
PAIRE A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh
a13 - 0,00 %
1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a12 Martine Zens -Noelle Fosse 51,06 %
3 NS 2P S+1 140 7.7 35.00
4 NS 2C N+3 200 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
a11 Chris Oostens -Catherine de Moffarts 57,84 %
5 NS 3K N-1 -100 8.8 40.00
6 NS 2K W = -90 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a10 Jean van Caloen -Marc Antoine de Halloy 54,81 %
7 NS 3C E+1 -170 16.5 75.00
8 NS 2P S+2 170 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a.9 Nicole Leclere -Madeleine Gabriel 50,97 %
9 NS 4C S = 420 6.6 30.00
10 NS 2S W-1 100 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Dilva Haym 44,72 %
13 NS 1S N = 90 15.4 70.00
14 NS 4C S = 420 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
a.6 Philippe d'Hoop -Juan del Marmol 39,77 %
15 NS 3K E = -110 4.5 20.45
16 NS 1S W = -90 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.5 Danielle Wybauw -Helene Schyns 49,60 %
17 NS 1S E-2 100 7.7 35.00
18 NS 1S S+1 120 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
a.4 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 51,14 %
19 NS 2P N = 110 12.1 55.00
20 NS 1S E = -90 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
a.3 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 38,07 %
21 NS 1S W-2 100 17 77.27
22 NS 3C W-2 200 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 63,66 %
23 NS 1S E+4 -210 2.3 10.45
24 NS 6S W = -990 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
a.1 Paul Henricot -Danielle Henricot 46,27 %
25 NS 2P S+2 170 13.2 60.00
26 NS 4P E+1 -650 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
Total : 265,7 / 484 = 54,90 %
PAIRE A.5 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier
a.9 Nicole Leclere -Madeleine Gabriel 50,97 %
1 NS 3S W = -400 21.9 99.55
2 NS 3T E-4 200 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
a.8 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Prisca Tondreau 52,37 %
3 NS 3P S-1 -50 4.5 20.45
4 NS 3C N+1 170 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Dilva Haym 44,72 %
5 NS 3K N+1 130 19.7 89.55
6 NS 2P S = 110 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 84,55 %
a.5 Danielle Wybauw -Helene Schyns 49,60 %
9 NS 4C S = 420 6.6 30.00
10 NS 2S W = -120 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
a.4 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 51,14 %
11 NS 3C S-1 -50 6.6 30.00
12 NS 2K W-2 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a.3 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 38,07 %
13 NS 1S N-2 -200 4.5 20.45
14 NS 3C N-1 -50 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 17,95 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 63,66 %
15 NS 1S E+2 -150 0.1 0.45
16 NS 2S S-3 -150 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a.1 Paul Henricot -Danielle Henricot 46,27 %
17 NS 1S E-3 150 18.6 84.55
18 NS 1S S = 90 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a13 - 0,00 %
19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a12 Martine Zens -Noelle Fosse 51,06 %
21 NS 1S W-2 100 17 77.27
22 NS 2P S-1 -50 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a11 Chris Oostens -Catherine de Moffarts 57,84 %
23 NS 2S W+2 -180 6.6 30.00
24 NS 6S W-1 50 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
a10 Jean van Caloen -Marc Antoine de Halloy 54,81 %
25 NS 2P S+2 170 13.2 60.00
26 NS 4P E = -620 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
Total : 257,1 / 484 = 53,12 %
PAIRE A13 Marianne Falla -Patrick Gilles
a12 Martine Zens -Noelle Fosse 51,06 %
1 NS 3S W+2 -460 7.7 35.00
2 NS 3K N+1 130 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a11 Chris Oostens -Catherine de Moffarts 57,84 %
3 NS 4P N = 420 18.6 84.55
4 NS 3T W = -110 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a10 Jean van Caloen -Marc Antoine de Halloy 54,81 %
5 NS 2P E+1 -140 5.5 25.00
6 NS 2P S-1 -50 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
a.9 Nicole Leclere -Madeleine Gabriel 50,97 %
7 NS 3C W+1 -170 16.5 75.00
8 NS 2P S+2 170 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a.8 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Prisca Tondreau 52,37 %
9 NS 4C S = 420 6.6 30.00
10 NS 2S W+1 -150 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
a.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Dilva Haym 44,72 %
11 NS 4C S-1 -50 6.6 30.00
12 NS 3K W-3 150 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a.6 Philippe d'Hoop -Juan del Marmol 39,77 %
13 NS 1S N+1 120 18.6 84.55
14 NS 2C S+1 140 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 82,05 %
a.5 Danielle Wybauw -Helene Schyns 49,60 %
15 NS 3K E = -110 4.5 20.45
16 NS 2K N-2 -100 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 45,23 %
a.4 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 51,14 %
17 NS 4T N+1 150 18.6 84.55
18 NS 1S S+2 150 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 92,05 %
a.3 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 38,07 %
19 NS 2P N = 110 12.1 55.00
20 NS 1S E+1 -120 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 63,66 %
21 NS 1S W-1 50 9 40.91
22 NS 3P S-2 -100 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a13 - 0,00 %
25 NS BYE 0 0.00
26 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 242,9 / 484 = 50,19 %
PAIRE A.1 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse
a.1 Paul Henricot -Danielle Henricot 46,27 %
1 NS 3S W+2 -460 7.7 35.00
2 NS 3S N+1 630 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a13 - 0,00 %
3 NS BYE 0 0.00
4 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a12 Martine Zens -Noelle Fosse 51,06 %
5 NS 3P W = -140 5.5 25.00
6 NS 2P S = 110 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a11 Chris Oostens -Catherine de Moffarts 57,84 %
7 NS 4C W = -620 6.6 30.00
8 NS 3P S+1 170 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
a10 Jean van Caloen -Marc Antoine de Halloy 54,81 %
9 NS 4C S = 420 6.6 30.00
10 NS 2S W+1 -150 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
a.9 Nicole Leclere -Madeleine Gabriel 50,97 %
11 NS 3C S = 140 12.1 55.00
12 NS 3S S-2 -200 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a.8 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Prisca Tondreau 52,37 %
13 NS 3S W-4 400 21.9 99.55
14 NS 3C S = 140 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
a.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Dilva Haym 44,72 %
15 NS 2P N-1 -100 8.8 40.00
16 NS 3S W = -600 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
a.6 Philippe d'Hoop -Juan del Marmol 39,77 %
17 NS 2S S+2 180 21.9 99.55
18 NS 2C W-1 50 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a.5 Danielle Wybauw -Helene Schyns 49,60 %
19 NS 2P N = 110 12.1 55.00
20 NS 3C N-1 -100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.4 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 51,14 %
21 NS 1S W = -90 3 13.64
22 NS 3S N-2 -100 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
a.3 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 38,07 %
23 NS 2P S-1 -100 19.7 89.55
24 NS 6S W-1 50 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
Total : 236,7 / 484 = 48,90 %
PAIRE A10 Claire Rolin -Efthalia Bogaerts
a.6 Philippe d'Hoop -Juan del Marmol 39,77 %
1 NS 3S W+2 -460 7.7 35.00
2 NS 4CcE-4 800 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a.5 Danielle Wybauw -Helene Schyns 49,60 %
3 NS 3P S = 140 7.7 35.00
4 NS 2C N+3 200 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
a.4 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 51,14 %
5 NS 1C N+1 110 15.4 70.00
6 NS 1S E+1 -120 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
a.3 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 38,07 %
7 NS 4C W-1 100 21.9 99.55
8 NS 2P S+2 170 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 63,66 %
9 NS 4C S = 420 6.6 30.00
10 NS 2S W+1 -150 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
a.1 Paul Henricot -Danielle Henricot 46,27 %
11 NS 4C S = 420 20.8 94.55
12 NS 2P N-1 -100 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a13 - 0,00 %
13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a12 Martine Zens -Noelle Fosse 51,06 %
15 NS 3K E-1 50 14.3 65.00
16 NS 1P E+4 -200 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
a10 Jean van Caloen -Marc Antoine de Halloy 54,81 %
19 NS 2P N-1 -50 3.4 15.45
20 NS 2K E+1 -110 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 12,95 %
a.9 Nicole Leclere -Madeleine Gabriel 50,97 %
21 NS 1S W-2 100 17 77.27
22 NS 2P S = 110 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a.8 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Prisca Tondreau 52,37 %
23 NS 3T E+1 -130 17.5 79.55
24 NS 6S W = -990 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 54,77 %
a.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Dilva Haym 44,72 %
25 NS 4P S-1 -50 0.1 0.45
26 NS 4P E = -620 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
Total : 229,3 / 484 = 47,38 %
PAIRE A12 Annie Zeimes -Michel Lievens
a10 Jean van Caloen -Marc Antoine de Halloy 54,81 %
1 NS 3S W+2 -460 7.7 35.00
2 NS 3C E-1 50 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a.9 Nicole Leclere -Madeleine Gabriel 50,97 %
3 NS 4P S-2 -100 1.2 5.45
4 NS 4T W-1 100 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
a.8 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Prisca Tondreau 52,37 %
5 NS 3C N = 140 21.9 99.55
6 NS 1P S = 80 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Dilva Haym 44,72 %
7 NS 2C E+2 -170 16.5 75.00
8 NS 3P S+1 170 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a.6 Philippe d'Hoop -Juan del Marmol 39,77 %
9 NS 4C S = 420 6.6 30.00
10 NS 2S W+1 -150 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
a.5 Danielle Wybauw -Helene Schyns 49,60 %
11 NS 4C S-2 -100 1.2 5.45
12 NS 3C S = 140 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a.4 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 51,14 %
13 NS 1S N-2 -200 4.5 20.45
14 NS 3C N-1 -50 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 17,95 %
a.3 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 38,07 %
15 NS 2C W-1 50 14.3 65.00
16 NS 3S W-2 200 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 63,66 %
17 NS 1S E-2 100 7.7 35.00
18 NS 2T S = 90 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a.1 Paul Henricot -Danielle Henricot 46,27 %
19 NS 2P N+1 140 20.8 94.55
20 NS 3K W-1 100 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 87,05 %
a12 Martine Zens -Noelle Fosse 51,06 %
23 NS 2S W+2 -180 6.6 30.00
24 NS 6S W = -990 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
a11 Chris Oostens -Catherine de Moffarts 57,84 %
25 NS 2P S+2 170 13.2 60.00
26 NS 4P E = -620 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
Total : 249,7 / 528 = 47,29 %
PAIRE A.3 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst
a.5 Danielle Wybauw -Helene Schyns 49,60 %
1 NS 3S W+2 -460 7.7 35.00
2 NS 2S N = 120 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a.3 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 38,07 %
5 NS 3P W-2 100 11 50.00
6 NS 1S E-1 100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 63,66 %
7 NS 4C W = -620 6.6 30.00
8 NS 3P S+2 200 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
a.1 Paul Henricot -Danielle Henricot 46,27 %
9 NS 4C S+1 450 18.6 84.55
10 NS 2S W+2 -180 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a13 - 0,00 %
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a12 Martine Zens -Noelle Fosse 51,06 %
13 NS 1P E+1 -110 12.1 55.00
14 NS 1S N+1 120 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a11 Chris Oostens -Catherine de Moffarts 57,84 %
15 NS 3K E-1 50 14.3 65.00
16 NS 1P E+3 -170 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a10 Jean van Caloen -Marc Antoine de Halloy 54,81 %
17 NS 4T N-1 -50 0.1 0.45
18 NS 1S S+1 120 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a.9 Nicole Leclere -Madeleine Gabriel 50,97 %
19 NS 2P N = 110 12.1 55.00
20 NS 3C N-1 -100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.8 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Prisca Tondreau 52,37 %
21 NS 1S W-1 50 9 40.91
22 NS 3P S-1 -50 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Dilva Haym 44,72 %
23 NS 3S W+1 -630 0.1 0.45
24 NS 6S W = -990 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
a.6 Philippe d'Hoop -Juan del Marmol 39,77 %
25 NS 2P S+2 170 13.2 60.00
26 NS 3S W = -600 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
Total : 220,8 / 484 = 45,62 %
PAIRE A.8 Teresa Dekoster -Philippe van der Gracht
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 63,66 %
1 NS 3S W+2 -460 7.7 35.00
2 NS 3C E-1 50 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a.1 Paul Henricot -Danielle Henricot 46,27 %
3 NS 3P S+1 170 12.1 55.00
4 NS 3K W-1 100 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a13 - 0,00 %
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a12 Martine Zens -Noelle Fosse 51,06 %
7 NS 4TcS-3 -800 0.1 0.45
8 NS 4P S = 420 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a11 Chris Oostens -Catherine de Moffarts 57,84 %
9 NS 4C S = 420 6.6 30.00
10 NS 2S W+1 -150 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
a10 Jean van Caloen -Marc Antoine de Halloy 54,81 %
11 NS 2C S+2 170 17.5 79.55
12 NS 3S S-2 -200 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a.8 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Prisca Tondreau 52,37 %
15 NS 2S W-1 50 14.3 65.00
16 NS 1P E+3 -170 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Dilva Haym 44,72 %
17 NS 1S E-2 100 7.7 35.00
18 NS 1S S = 90 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a.6 Philippe d'Hoop -Juan del Marmol 39,77 %
19 NS 2P N = 110 12.1 55.00
20 NS 3C N-1 -100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.5 Danielle Wybauw -Helene Schyns 49,60 %
21 NS 1S W-1 50 9 40.91
22 NS 2P S = 110 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.4 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 51,14 %
23 NS 2S W+1 -150 13.2 60.00
24 NS 6S W = -990 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.3 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 38,07 %
25 NS 2P S+2 170 13.2 60.00
26 NS 4P E = -620 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
Total : 212,5 / 484 = 43,90 %
PAIRE A.4 Alan Beckman -Liliane Baptista
a.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Dilva Haym 44,72 %
1 NS 3S W+1 -430 18.6 84.55
2 NS 3C E-1 50 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.6 Philippe d'Hoop -Juan del Marmol 39,77 %
3 NS 4P S = 420 18.6 84.55
4 NS 3T E = -110 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.4 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 51,14 %
7 NS 3C E+2 -200 11 50.00
8 NS 3P S+1 170 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.3 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 38,07 %
9 NS 4C S+1 450 18.6 84.55
10 NS 2S W+1 -150 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 63,66 %
11 NS 3C S-1 -50 6.6 30.00
12 NS 2K W-2 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a.1 Paul Henricot -Danielle Henricot 46,27 %
13 NS 2K N-2 -200 4.5 20.45
14 NS 2S N = 120 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
a13 - 0,00 %
15 NS BYE 0 0.00
16 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a12 Martine Zens -Noelle Fosse 51,06 %
17 NS 3T S+1 130 14.3 65.00
18 NS 1S S-1 -100 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
a11 Chris Oostens -Catherine de Moffarts 57,84 %
19 NS 4P N-2 -100 0.1 0.45
20 NS 3C N-1 -100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
a10 Jean van Caloen -Marc Antoine de Halloy 54,81 %
21 NS 1S W = -90 3 13.64
22 NS 4C W-2 200 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.9 Nicole Leclere -Madeleine Gabriel 50,97 %
23 NS 2S W+1 -150 13.2 60.00
24 NS 6S W = -990 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.8 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Prisca Tondreau 52,37 %
25 NS 2P S+1 140 2.3 10.45
26 NS 4P E+1 -650 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 12,95 %
Total : 197,2 / 484 = 40,74 %
PAIRE A.6 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander
a11 Chris Oostens -Catherine de Moffarts 57,84 %
1 NS 3S W+2 -460 7.7 35.00
2 NS 4K N = 130 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a10 Jean van Caloen -Marc Antoine de Halloy 54,81 %
3 NS 3P S+1 170 12.1 55.00
4 NS 3C N = 140 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.9 Nicole Leclere -Madeleine Gabriel 50,97 %
5 NS 2C N-2 -200 1.2 5.45
6 NS 2S S-1 -50 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
a.8 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Prisca Tondreau 52,37 %
7 NS 4C W+1 -650 2.3 10.45
8 NS 2P S+2 170 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a.6 Philippe d'Hoop -Juan del Marmol 39,77 %
11 NS 4C S-2 -100 1.2 5.45
12 NS 1T N+1 90 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
a.5 Danielle Wybauw -Helene Schyns 49,60 %
13 NS 1S N-2 -200 4.5 20.45
14 NS 3P E-2 100 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a.4 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 51,14 %
15 NS 2C W-2 100 20.8 94.55
16 NS 2T S-4 -200 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.3 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 38,07 %
17 NS 3T S+1 130 14.3 65.00
18 NS 2P N-1 -100 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain 63,66 %
19 NS 2P N-1 -50 3.4 15.45
20 NS 3C N-1 -100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a.1 Paul Henricot -Danielle Henricot 46,27 %
21 NS 1S W+1 -120 0 0.00
22 NS 2C W-1 100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
a13 - 0,00 %
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a12 Martine Zens -Noelle Fosse 51,06 %
25 NS 2P S+2 170 13.2 60.00
26 NS 3S E+2 -660 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
Total : 155,0 / 484 = 32,02 %
PAIRE a.2 Dominique Sassen -Antoinette Jourdain
A.8 Teresa Dekoster -Philippe van der Gracht 43,90 %
1 EO 3S W+2 -460 14.3 65.00
2 EO 3C E-1 50 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 70,41 %
3 EO 4P S = 420 3.4 15.45
4 EO 3C N+1 170 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
A.9 Jacques Podevyn -Francine Belet 55,81 %
5 EO 3C N-2 -200 20.8 94.55
6 EO 1S E = -90 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
A.3 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 45,62 %
7 EO 4C W = -620 15.4 70.00
8 EO 3P S+2 200 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
A10 Claire Rolin -Efthalia Bogaerts 47,38 %
9 EO 4C S = 420 15.4 70.00
10 EO 2S W+1 -150 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Liliane Baptista 40,74 %
11 EO 3C S-1 -50 15.4 70.00
12 EO 2K W-2 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A11 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 59,67 %
13 EO 2P W = -110 9.9 45.00
14 EO 2S N = 120 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.5 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier 53,12 %
15 EO 1S E+2 -150 21.9 99.55
16 EO 2S S-3 -150 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A12 Annie Zeimes -Michel Lievens 47,29 %
17 EO 1S E-2 100 14.3 65.00
18 EO 2T S = 90 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A.6 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander 32,02 %
19 EO 2P N-1 -50 18.6 84.55
20 EO 3C N-1 -100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A13 Marianne Falla -Patrick Gilles 50,19 %
21 EO 1S W-1 50 13 59.09
22 EO 3P S-2 -100 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 54,90 %
23 EO 1S E+4 -210 19.7 89.55
24 EO 6S W = -990 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
Total : 336,1 / 528 = 63,66 %
PAIRE a11 Chris Oostens -Catherine de Moffarts
A.6 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander 32,02 %
1 EO 3S W+2 -460 14.3 65.00
2 EO 4K N = 130 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A13 Marianne Falla -Patrick Gilles 50,19 %
3 EO 4P N = 420 3.4 15.45
4 EO 3T W = -110 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 54,90 %
5 EO 3K N-1 -100 13.2 60.00
6 EO 2K W = -90 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A.1 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 48,90 %
7 EO 4C W = -620 15.4 70.00
8 EO 3P S+1 170 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
A.8 Teresa Dekoster -Philippe van der Gracht 43,90 %
9 EO 4C S = 420 15.4 70.00
10 EO 2S W+1 -150 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 70,41 %
11 EO 4T E-3 150 6.6 30.00
12 EO 2S S = 120 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
A.9 Jacques Podevyn -Francine Belet 55,81 %
13 EO 1S N-2 -200 17.5 79.55
14 EO 3P E = -140 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
A.3 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 45,62 %
15 EO 3K E-1 50 7.7 35.00
16 EO 1P E+3 -170 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Liliane Baptista 40,74 %
19 EO 4P N-2 -100 21.9 99.55
20 EO 3C N-1 -100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
A11 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 59,67 %
21 EO 2S W-1 50 13 59.09
22 EO 2P S = 110 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.5 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier 53,12 %
23 EO 2S W+2 -180 15.4 70.00
24 EO 6S W-1 50 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
A12 Annie Zeimes -Michel Lievens 47,29 %
25 EO 2P S+2 170 8.8 40.00
26 EO 4P E = -620 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
Total : 305,4 / 528 = 57,84 %
PAIRE a10 Jean van Caloen -Marc Antoine de Halloy
A12 Annie Zeimes -Michel Lievens 47,29 %
1 EO 3S W+2 -460 14.3 65.00
2 EO 3C E-1 50 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A.6 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander 32,02 %
3 EO 3P S+1 170 9.9 45.00
4 EO 3C N = 140 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A13 Marianne Falla -Patrick Gilles 50,19 %
5 EO 2P E+1 -140 16.5 75.00
6 EO 2P S-1 -50 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 54,90 %
7 EO 3C E+1 -170 5.5 25.00
8 EO 2P S+2 170 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A.1 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 48,90 %
9 EO 4C S = 420 15.4 70.00
10 EO 2S W+1 -150 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
A.8 Teresa Dekoster -Philippe van der Gracht 43,90 %
11 EO 2C S+2 170 4.5 20.45
12 EO 3S S-2 -200 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 70,41 %
13 EO 1S N+1 120 3.4 15.45
14 EO 2C S+1 140 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 17,95 %
A.3 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 45,62 %
17 EO 4T N-1 -50 21.9 99.55
18 EO 1S S+1 120 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A10 Claire Rolin -Efthalia Bogaerts 47,38 %
19 EO 2P N-1 -50 18.6 84.55
20 EO 2K E+1 -110 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 87,05 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Liliane Baptista 40,74 %
21 EO 1S W = -90 19 86.36
22 EO 4C W-2 200 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A11 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 59,67 %
23 EO 2S W+2 -180 15.4 70.00
24 EO 6S W-1 50 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
A.5 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier 53,12 %
25 EO 2P S+2 170 8.8 40.00
26 EO 4P E = -620 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
Total : 289,4 / 528 = 54,81 %
PAIRE a.8 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Prisca Tondreau
A11 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 59,67 %
1 EO 3S W+2 -460 14.3 65.00
2 EO 3K N = 110 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
A.5 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier 53,12 %
3 EO 3P S-1 -50 17.5 79.55
4 EO 3C N+1 170 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A12 Annie Zeimes -Michel Lievens 47,29 %
5 EO 3C N = 140 0.1 0.45
6 EO 1P S = 80 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A.6 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander 32,02 %
7 EO 4C W+1 -650 19.7 89.55
8 EO 2P S+2 170 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A13 Marianne Falla -Patrick Gilles 50,19 %
9 EO 4C S = 420 15.4 70.00
10 EO 2S W+1 -150 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
A.1 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 48,90 %
13 EO 3S W-4 400 0.1 0.45
14 EO 3C S = 140 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
A.8 Teresa Dekoster -Philippe van der Gracht 43,90 %
15 EO 2S W-1 50 7.7 35.00
16 EO 1P E+3 -170 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 70,41 %
17 EO 1S E-1 50 19.7 89.55
18 EO 1S S+1 120 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.9 Jacques Podevyn -Francine Belet 55,81 %
19 EO 2P N = 110 9.9 45.00
20 EO 3C S = 140 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A.3 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 45,62 %
21 EO 1S W-1 50 13 59.09
22 EO 3P S-1 -50 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A10 Claire Rolin -Efthalia Bogaerts 47,38 %
23 EO 3T E+1 -130 4.5 20.45
24 EO 6S W = -990 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 45,23 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Liliane Baptista 40,74 %
25 EO 2P S+1 140 19.7 89.55
26 EO 4P E+1 -650 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 87,05 %
Total : 276,5 / 528 = 52,37 %
PAIRE a.4 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger
A.9 Jacques Podevyn -Francine Belet 55,81 %
1 EO 3S W+1 -430 3.4 15.45
2 EO 2P W+1 -140 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A10 Claire Rolin -Efthalia Bogaerts 47,38 %
5 EO 1C N+1 110 6.6 30.00
6 EO 1S E+1 -120 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Liliane Baptista 40,74 %
7 EO 3C E+2 -200 11 50.00
8 EO 3P S+1 170 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A11 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 59,67 %
9 EO 4C S+1 450 3.4 15.45
10 EO 2S W+1 -150 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A.5 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier 53,12 %
11 EO 3C S-1 -50 15.4 70.00
12 EO 2K W-2 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A12 Annie Zeimes -Michel Lievens 47,29 %
13 EO 1S N-2 -200 17.5 79.55
14 EO 3C N-1 -50 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 82,05 %
A.6 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander 32,02 %
15 EO 2C W-2 100 1.2 5.45
16 EO 2T S-4 -200 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A13 Marianne Falla -Patrick Gilles 50,19 %
17 EO 4T N+1 150 3.4 15.45
18 EO 1S S+2 150 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 7,95 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 54,90 %
19 EO 2P N = 110 9.9 45.00
20 EO 1S E = -90 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
A.1 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 48,90 %
21 EO 1S W = -90 19 86.36
22 EO 3S N-2 -100 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
A.8 Teresa Dekoster -Philippe van der Gracht 43,90 %
23 EO 2S W+1 -150 8.8 40.00
24 EO 6S W = -990 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 70,41 %
25 EO 2P S+2 170 8.8 40.00
26 EO 4P E-1 100 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
Total : 270,0 / 528 = 51,14 %
PAIRE a12 Martine Zens -Noelle Fosse
A13 Marianne Falla -Patrick Gilles 50,19 %
1 EO 3S W+2 -460 14.3 65.00
2 EO 3K N+1 130 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 54,90 %
3 EO 2P S+1 140 14.3 65.00
4 EO 2C N+3 200 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
A.1 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 48,90 %
5 EO 3P W = -140 16.5 75.00
6 EO 2P S = 110 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.8 Teresa Dekoster -Philippe van der Gracht 43,90 %
7 EO 4TcS-3 -800 21.9 99.55
8 EO 4P S = 420 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 70,41 %
9 EO 4C N+1 450 3.4 15.45
10 EO 2S W+1 -150 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A.9 Jacques Podevyn -Francine Belet 55,81 %
11 EO 3C S = 140 9.9 45.00
12 EO 3K W-3 150 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A.3 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 45,62 %
13 EO 1P E+1 -110 9.9 45.00
14 EO 1S N+1 120 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A10 Claire Rolin -Efthalia Bogaerts 47,38 %
15 EO 3K E-1 50 7.7 35.00
16 EO 1P E+4 -200 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Liliane Baptista 40,74 %
17 EO 3T S+1 130 7.7 35.00
18 EO 1S S-1 -100 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A.5 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier 53,12 %
21 EO 1S W-2 100 5 22.73
22 EO 2P S-1 -50 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A12 Annie Zeimes -Michel Lievens 47,29 %
23 EO 2S W+2 -180 15.4 70.00
24 EO 6S W = -990 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
A.6 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander 32,02 %
25 EO 2P S+2 170 8.8 40.00
26 EO 3S E+2 -660 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
Total : 269,6 / 528 = 51,06 %
PAIRE a.9 Nicole Leclere -Madeleine Gabriel
A.5 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier 53,12 %
1 EO 3S W = -400 0.1 0.45
2 EO 3T E-4 200 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
A12 Annie Zeimes -Michel Lievens 47,29 %
3 EO 4P S-2 -100 20.8 94.55
4 EO 4T W-1 100 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
A.6 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander 32,02 %
5 EO 2C N-2 -200 20.8 94.55
6 EO 2S S-1 -50 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
A13 Marianne Falla -Patrick Gilles 50,19 %
7 EO 3C W+1 -170 5.5 25.00
8 EO 2P S+2 170 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 54,90 %
9 EO 4C S = 420 15.4 70.00
10 EO 2S W-1 100 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A.1 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 48,90 %
11 EO 3C S = 140 9.9 45.00
12 EO 3S S-2 -200 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 70,41 %
15 EO 2C W = -110 17.5 79.55
16 EO 1K N-1 -50 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.9 Jacques Podevyn -Francine Belet 55,81 %
17 EO 2C E-2 100 14.3 65.00
18 EO 2K E = -90 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A.3 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 45,62 %
19 EO 2P N = 110 9.9 45.00
20 EO 3C N-1 -100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A10 Claire Rolin -Efthalia Bogaerts 47,38 %
21 EO 1S W-2 100 5 22.73
22 EO 2P S = 110 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Liliane Baptista 40,74 %
23 EO 2S W+1 -150 8.8 40.00
24 EO 6S W = -990 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A11 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 59,67 %
25 EO 2P N+2 170 8.8 40.00
26 EO 3P E+1 -170 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
Total : 269,1 / 528 = 50,97 %
PAIRE a.5 Danielle Wybauw -Helene Schyns
A.3 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 45,62 %
1 EO 3S W+2 -460 14.3 65.00
2 EO 2S N = 120 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A10 Claire Rolin -Efthalia Bogaerts 47,38 %
3 EO 3P S = 140 14.3 65.00
4 EO 2C N+3 200 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
A11 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 59,67 %
7 EO 2C E+2 -170 5.5 25.00
8 EO 3P S+1 170 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A.5 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier 53,12 %
9 EO 4C S = 420 15.4 70.00
10 EO 2S W = -120 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
A12 Annie Zeimes -Michel Lievens 47,29 %
11 EO 4C S-2 -100 20.8 94.55
12 EO 3C S = 140 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A.6 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander 32,02 %
13 EO 1S N-2 -200 17.5 79.55
14 EO 3P E-2 100 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A13 Marianne Falla -Patrick Gilles 50,19 %
15 EO 3K E = -110 17.5 79.55
16 EO 2K N-2 -100 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 54,77 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 54,90 %
17 EO 1S E-2 100 14.3 65.00
18 EO 1S S+1 120 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
A.1 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 48,90 %
19 EO 2P N = 110 9.9 45.00
20 EO 3C N-1 -100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.8 Teresa Dekoster -Philippe van der Gracht 43,90 %
21 EO 1S W-1 50 13 59.09
22 EO 2P S = 110 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 70,41 %
23 EO 2S W+1 -150 8.8 40.00
24 EO 6S W = -990 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.9 Jacques Podevyn -Francine Belet 55,81 %
25 EO 2P S+2 170 8.8 40.00
26 EO 4P E-1 100 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
Total : 261,9 / 528 = 49,60 %
PAIRE a.1 Paul Henricot -Danielle Henricot
A.1 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 48,90 %
1 EO 3S W+2 -460 14.3 65.00
2 EO 3S N+1 630 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A.8 Teresa Dekoster -Philippe van der Gracht 43,90 %
3 EO 3P S+1 170 9.9 45.00
4 EO 3K W-1 100 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 70,41 %
5 EO 2C N = 110 6.6 30.00
6 EO 1S W-3 300 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
A.9 Jacques Podevyn -Francine Belet 55,81 %
7 EO 4C W = -620 15.4 70.00
8 EO 3P S+1 170 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
A.3 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 45,62 %
9 EO 4C S+1 450 3.4 15.45
10 EO 2S W+2 -180 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A10 Claire Rolin -Efthalia Bogaerts 47,38 %
11 EO 4C S = 420 1.2 5.45
12 EO 2P N-1 -100 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Liliane Baptista 40,74 %
13 EO 2K N-2 -200 17.5 79.55
14 EO 2S N = 120 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A11 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 59,67 %
15 EO 3S W-2 100 1.2 5.45
16 EO 1P E+2 -140 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.5 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier 53,12 %
17 EO 1S E-3 150 3.4 15.45
18 EO 1S S = 90 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A12 Annie Zeimes -Michel Lievens 47,29 %
19 EO 2P N+1 140 1.2 5.45
20 EO 3K W-1 100 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 12,95 %
A.6 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander 32,02 %
21 EO 1S W+1 -120 22 100.00
22 EO 2C W-1 100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 54,90 %
25 EO 2P S+2 170 8.8 40.00
26 EO 4P E+1 -650 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
Total : 244,3 / 528 = 46,27 %
PAIRE a.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Dilva Haym
A.4 Alan Beckman -Liliane Baptista 40,74 %
1 EO 3S W+1 -430 3.4 15.45
2 EO 3C E-1 50 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A11 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 59,67 %
3 EO 4PcS-1 -100 20.8 94.55
4 EO 4TcW-1 200 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A.5 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier 53,12 %
5 EO 3K N+1 130 2.3 10.45
6 EO 2P S = 110 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 15,45 %
A12 Annie Zeimes -Michel Lievens 47,29 %
7 EO 2C E+2 -170 5.5 25.00
8 EO 3P S+1 170 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A13 Marianne Falla -Patrick Gilles 50,19 %
11 EO 4C S-1 -50 15.4 70.00
12 EO 3K W-3 150 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 54,90 %
13 EO 1S N = 90 6.6 30.00
14 EO 4C S = 420 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
A.1 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 48,90 %
15 EO 2P N-1 -100 13.2 60.00
16 EO 3S W = -600 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
A.8 Teresa Dekoster -Philippe van der Gracht 43,90 %
17 EO 1S E-2 100 14.3 65.00
18 EO 1S S = 90 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 70,41 %
19 EO 2P N+1 140 1.2 5.45
20 EO 3C N = 140 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 5,45 %
A.9 Jacques Podevyn -Francine Belet 55,81 %
21 EO 1S W-2 100 5 22.73
22 EO 3S E-2 200 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
A.3 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 45,62 %
23 EO 3S W+1 -630 21.9 99.55
24 EO 6S W = -990 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
A10 Claire Rolin -Efthalia Bogaerts 47,38 %
25 EO 4P S-1 -50 21.9 99.55
26 EO 4P E = -620 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
Total : 236,1 / 528 = 44,72 %
PAIRE a.6 Philippe d'Hoop -Juan del Marmol
A10 Claire Rolin -Efthalia Bogaerts 47,38 %
1 EO 3S W+2 -460 14.3 65.00
2 EO 4CcE-4 800 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Liliane Baptista 40,74 %
3 EO 4P S = 420 3.4 15.45
4 EO 3T E = -110 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A11 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 59,67 %
5 EO 2C N = 110 6.6 30.00
6 EO 2P S = 110 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A12 Annie Zeimes -Michel Lievens 47,29 %
9 EO 4C S = 420 15.4 70.00
10 EO 2S W+1 -150 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
A.6 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander 32,02 %
11 EO 4C S-2 -100 20.8 94.55
12 EO 1T N+1 90 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
A13 Marianne Falla -Patrick Gilles 50,19 %
13 EO 1S N+1 120 3.4 15.45
14 EO 2C S+1 140 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 17,95 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 54,90 %
15 EO 3K E = -110 17.5 79.55
16 EO 1S W = -90 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.1 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 48,90 %
17 EO 2S S+2 180 0.1 0.45
18 EO 2C W-1 50 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A.8 Teresa Dekoster -Philippe van der Gracht 43,90 %
19 EO 2P N = 110 9.9 45.00
20 EO 3C N-1 -100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 70,41 %
21 EO 2S W-3 150 0 0.00
22 EO 2P S+2 170 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
A.9 Jacques Podevyn -Francine Belet 55,81 %
23 EO 3S W-1 100 0.1 0.45
24 EO 3S W+2 -460 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
A.3 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 45,62 %
25 EO 2P S+2 170 8.8 40.00
26 EO 3S W = -600 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
Total : 210,0 / 528 = 39,77 %
PAIRE a.3 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart
A.9 Jacques Podevyn -Francine Belet 55,81 %
3 EO 4P S = 420 3.4 15.45
4 EO 4C N = 620 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 7,95 %
A.3 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 45,62 %
5 EO 3P W-2 100 11 50.00
6 EO 1S E-1 100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A10 Claire Rolin -Efthalia Bogaerts 47,38 %
7 EO 4C W-1 100 0.1 0.45
8 EO 2P S+2 170 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Liliane Baptista 40,74 %
9 EO 4C S+1 450 3.4 15.45
10 EO 2S W+1 -150 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A11 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 59,67 %
11 EO 4C S = 420 1.2 5.45
12 EO 2K W-2 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A.5 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier 53,12 %
13 EO 1S N-2 -200 17.5 79.55
14 EO 3C N-1 -50 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 82,05 %
A12 Annie Zeimes -Michel Lievens 47,29 %
15 EO 2C W-1 50 7.7 35.00
16 EO 3S W-2 200 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
A.6 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander 32,02 %
17 EO 3T S+1 130 7.7 35.00
18 EO 2P N-1 -100 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A13 Marianne Falla -Patrick Gilles 50,19 %
19 EO 2P N = 110 9.9 45.00
20 EO 1S E+1 -120 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 54,90 %
21 EO 1S W-2 100 5 22.73
22 EO 3C W-2 200 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
A.1 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 48,90 %
23 EO 2P S-1 -100 2.3 10.45
24 EO 6S W-1 50 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
A.8 Teresa Dekoster -Philippe van der Gracht 43,90 %
25 EO 2P S+2 170 8.8 40.00
26 EO 4P E = -620 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
Total : 201,0 / 528 = 38,07 %
PAIRE a13 -
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 54,90 %
1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.1 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 48,90 %
3 EO BYE 0 0.00
4 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.8 Teresa Dekoster -Philippe van der Gracht 43,90 %
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 70,41 %
7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.9 Jacques Podevyn -Francine Belet 55,81 %
9 EO BYE 0 0.00
10 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.3 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 45,62 %
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A10 Claire Rolin -Efthalia Bogaerts 47,38 %
13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Liliane Baptista 40,74 %
15 EO BYE 0 0.00
16 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A11 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 59,67 %
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.5 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier 53,12 %
19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.6 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander 32,02 %
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A13 Marianne Falla -Patrick Gilles 50,19 %
25 EO BYE 0 0.00
26 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 572 = 0,00 %
|