B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 59,47 A11 Sophie Tilemans -Annette Fobe
--- 2 58,52 A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli
--- 3 58,33 A12 Lydia Wildiers -Philippe van der Gracht
--- 4 56,63 A10 Brigitte Brusselmans -Claire Derieuw
--- 5 51,14 A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary
--- 6 49,62 A.6 Michele Berrier -Nicole Leclere
--- 7 49,43 A13 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart
--- 8 48,67 A.2 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Caroll Pucher
--- 9 47,54 A.9 Jacqueline de Thier -Jeannine Wanderpepen
--- 10 47,35 A.1 Anne Arsac -Catherine de Moffarts
--- 11 46,02 A.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne
--- 12 45,08 A.5 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens
--- 13 32,20 A.8 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 61,74 a12 Patrick Gilles -Philippe Dekandelaer
--- 2 58,52 a.2 Serge Alard -Francoise Turin
--- 3 58,14 a.9 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart
--- 4 57,95 a.7 Hugo Baetens -Colette Heerinckx
--- 5 53,60 a13 Francine Belet -Marie-Jeanne Boulanger
--- 6 52,27 a.4 Christiane Huby -Gerard Cooreman
--- 7 49,81 a.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Dominique Sassen
--- 8 46,21 a.8 Angela Carisi -Carla Gervais
--- 9 45,83 a11 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert
--- 10 43,75 a10 Virginie Van Damme -Veronique Englebienne
--- 11 42,80 a.3 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant
--- 12 39,77 a.5 Christian Deruyck -Therese Roland
--- 13 39,58 a.1 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor
PAIRE A11 Sophie Tilemans -Annette Fobe
a.8 Angela Carisi -Carla Gervais 46,21 %
1 NS 4P N = 420 5 22.73
2 NS 3S W-3 150 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.7 Hugo Baetens -Colette Heerinckx 57,95 %
3 NS 3K W-3 300 13 59.09
4 NS 2C E+1 -140 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Dominique Sassen 49,81 %
5 NS 4K E+1 -150 16 72.73
6 NS 3S N+2 460 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.5 Christian Deruyck -Therese Roland 39,77 %
7 NS 3T E-2 200 22 100.00
8 NS 4C S-1 -50 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a.4 Christiane Huby -Gerard Cooreman 52,27 %
9 NS 4C S-1 -50 8 36.36
10 NS 3P E-1 100 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.3 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 42,80 %
11 NS 3C N-1 -50 13 59.09
12 NS 3S W-1 50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a.2 Serge Alard -Francoise Turin 58,52 %
13 NS 4P N = 620 11 50.00
14 NS 3K S-1 -50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a.1 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 39,58 %
15 NS 3C S-2 -200 2 9.09
16 NS 2S E = -120 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a13 Francine Belet -Marie-Jeanne Boulanger 53,60 %
17 NS 3S W = -400 21 95.45
18 NS 3P N-1 -100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a11 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 45,83 %
21 NS 4C E+2 -480 12 54.55
22 NS 4C N+1 450 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a10 Virginie Van Damme -Veronique Englebienne 43,75 %
23 NS 4P W+1 -650 17 77.27
24 NS 5C E-2 100 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
a.9 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 58,14 %
25 NS 4C S-1 -50 8 36.36
26 NS 2P W+2 -170 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
Total : 314,0 / 528 = 59,47 %
PAIRE A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli
a13 Francine Belet -Marie-Jeanne Boulanger 53,60 %
1 NS 4P S+1 450 17 77.27
2 NS 2C W = -110 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a12 Patrick Gilles -Philippe Dekandelaer 61,74 %
3 NS 5T S = 400 18 81.82
4 NS 2C E+3 -200 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a11 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 45,83 %
5 NS 5K E = -400 11 50.00
6 NS 4C S+2 480 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a10 Virginie Van Damme -Veronique Englebienne 43,75 %
7 NS 2S W+1 -150 10 45.45
8 NS 4C S-1 -50 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.9 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 58,14 %
9 NS 4C S-1 -50 8 36.36
10 NS 2P E = -110 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.7 Hugo Baetens -Colette Heerinckx 57,95 %
13 NS 4P N = 620 11 50.00
14 NS 2P N-2 -100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Dominique Sassen 49,81 %
15 NS 4C N = 620 20 90.91
16 NS 2S E = -120 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.5 Christian Deruyck -Therese Roland 39,77 %
17 NS 3S W = -400 21 95.45
18 NS 5T S+1 620 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 97,73 %
a.4 Christiane Huby -Gerard Cooreman 52,27 %
19 NS 4P E-1 100 10 45.45
20 NS 3C N = 140 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a.3 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 42,80 %
21 NS 6C E = -980 0 0.00
22 NS 4C N+2 480 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.2 Serge Alard -Francoise Turin 58,52 %
23 NS 4P W+2 -680 8 36.36
24 NS 4C E-1 50 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.1 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 39,58 %
25 NS 4C S-1 -50 8 36.36
26 NS 3C N-1 -100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
Total : 309,0 / 528 = 58,52 %
PAIRE A12 Lydia Wildiers -Philippe van der Gracht
a10 Virginie Van Damme -Veronique Englebienne 43,75 %
1 NS 3S N+1 430 12 54.55
2 NS 3S W-1 50 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.9 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 58,14 %
3 NS 4T S+2 170 8 36.36
4 NS 2P S-3 -300 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.8 Angela Carisi -Carla Gervais 46,21 %
5 NS 2C S+1 140 22 100.00
6 NS 4C S+2 480 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 97,73 %
a.7 Hugo Baetens -Colette Heerinckx 57,95 %
7 NS 2K W+2 -130 16 72.73
8 NS 4C S = 420 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
a.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Dominique Sassen 49,81 %
9 NS 4C S-1 -50 8 36.36
10 NS 3P E-1 100 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.5 Christian Deruyck -Therese Roland 39,77 %
11 NS 4C S-2 -100 7 31.82
12 NS 3S W = -400 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a.4 Christiane Huby -Gerard Cooreman 52,27 %
13 NS 4P N+1 650 22 100.00
14 NS 2P N = 110 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
a.3 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 42,80 %
15 NS 3S N+1 630 22 100.00
16 NS 2S E-1 100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
a.2 Serge Alard -Francoise Turin 58,52 %
17 NS 3S W+3 -490 3 13.64
18 NS 4KcW = -510 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 6,82 %
a.1 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 39,58 %
19 NS 4P E-4 400 20 90.91
20 NS 4C N-1 -100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a12 Patrick Gilles -Philippe Dekandelaer 61,74 %
23 NS 3S W+3 -690 0 0.00
24 NS 4C E-1 50 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a11 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 45,83 %
25 NS 4C S = 420 19 86.36
26 NS 4P W = -620 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
Total : 308,0 / 528 = 58,33 %
PAIRE A10 Brigitte Brusselmans -Claire Derieuw
a.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Dominique Sassen 49,81 %
1 NS 4P N = 420 5 22.73
2 NS 3T E+1 -130 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.5 Christian Deruyck -Therese Roland 39,77 %
3 NS 1S N+4 210 10 45.45
4 NS 3S W-1 100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.4 Christiane Huby -Gerard Cooreman 52,27 %
5 NS 5K E = -400 11 50.00
6 NS 3S N-1 -50 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a.3 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 42,80 %
7 NS 5K W = -600 3 13.64
8 NS 5PcE-2 300 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a.2 Serge Alard -Francoise Turin 58,52 %
9 NS 4C S-1 -50 8 36.36
10 NS 3P E-1 100 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.1 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 39,58 %
11 NS 3C N = 140 20 90.91
12 NS 2C E+1 -140 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a13 Francine Belet -Marie-Jeanne Boulanger 53,60 %
13 NS 4P N = 620 11 50.00
14 NS 3T E-1 50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a12 Patrick Gilles -Philippe Dekandelaer 61,74 %
15 NS 2P W = -110 8 36.36
16 NS 2S E = -120 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a10 Virginie Van Damme -Veronique Englebienne 43,75 %
19 NS 4P E-3 300 16 72.73
20 NS 4C N-1 -100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.9 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 58,14 %
21 NS 4P W+2 -480 12 54.55
22 NS 4C N+2 480 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a.8 Angela Carisi -Carla Gervais 46,21 %
23 NS 3S W+1 -630 20 90.91
24 NS 4K S = 130 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 95,45 %
a.7 Hugo Baetens -Colette Heerinckx 57,95 %
25 NS 4C S = 420 19 86.36
26 NS 3P W = -140 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
Total : 299,0 / 528 = 56,63 %
PAIRE A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary
a.7 Hugo Baetens -Colette Heerinckx 57,95 %
1 NS 4P S+1 450 17 77.27
2 NS 2T E+2 -130 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Dominique Sassen 49,81 %
3 NS 4T S+1 150 5 22.73
4 NS 5T W+1 -620 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a.4 Christiane Huby -Gerard Cooreman 52,27 %
7 NS 5K W = -600 3 13.64
8 NS 4PcE+1 -690 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 6,82 %
a.3 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 42,80 %
9 NS 3S S+1 430 22 100.00
10 NS 3P E-1 100 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 93,18 %
a.2 Serge Alard -Francoise Turin 58,52 %
11 NS 3S N+1 430 22 100.00
12 NS 3S W+1 -430 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.1 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 39,58 %
13 NS 4P N = 620 11 50.00
14 NS 2K S+2 130 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a13 Francine Belet -Marie-Jeanne Boulanger 53,60 %
15 NS 3C S-1 -100 10 45.45
16 NS 2S E+1 -150 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a12 Patrick Gilles -Philippe Dekandelaer 61,74 %
17 NS 3S W+2 -460 12 54.55
18 NS 5T S = 600 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a11 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 45,83 %
19 NS 3P E-4 400 20 90.91
20 NS 3C N+1 170 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 95,45 %
a10 Virginie Van Damme -Veronique Englebienne 43,75 %
21 NS 4P W+2 -480 12 54.55
22 NS 4C N = 420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.9 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 58,14 %
23 NS 4P W+2 -680 8 36.36
24 NS 4CcE-1 100 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.8 Angela Carisi -Carla Gervais 46,21 %
25 NS 3T S-5 -250 0 0.00
26 NS 2P W+3 -200 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
Total : 270,0 / 528 = 51,14 %
PAIRE A.6 Michele Berrier -Nicole Leclere
a11 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 45,83 %
1 NS 4P S = 420 5 22.73
2 NS Pass Passe 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a10 Virginie Van Damme -Veronique Englebienne 43,75 %
3 NS 5T S = 400 18 81.82
4 NS 6C E-4 400 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
a.9 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 58,14 %
5 NS 5K E = -400 11 50.00
6 NS 5K N = 400 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.8 Angela Carisi -Carla Gervais 46,21 %
7 NS 3K W+1 -130 16 72.73
8 NS 4C S-1 -50 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Dominique Sassen 49,81 %
11 NS 3TcE = -470 0 0.00
12 NS 3S W-1 50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a.5 Christian Deruyck -Therese Roland 39,77 %
13 NS 4P N = 620 11 50.00
14 NS 2P N-1 -50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a.4 Christiane Huby -Gerard Cooreman 52,27 %
15 NS 2P W+1 -140 5 22.73
16 NS 2S E = -120 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a.3 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 42,80 %
17 NS 3S W+2 -460 12 54.55
18 NS 5KcW-1 100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.2 Serge Alard -Francoise Turin 58,52 %
19 NS 4P E-2 200 14 63.64
20 NS 3C N-1 -100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.1 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 39,58 %
21 NS 4P E+2 -480 12 54.55
22 NS 4C N+1 450 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a13 Francine Belet -Marie-Jeanne Boulanger 53,60 %
23 NS 4P W+2 -680 8 36.36
24 NS 1C E+2 -140 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a12 Patrick Gilles -Philippe Dekandelaer 61,74 %
25 NS 4C S-1 -50 8 36.36
26 NS 2P W+1 -140 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
Total : 262,0 / 528 = 49,62 %
PAIRE A13 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart
a12 Patrick Gilles -Philippe Dekandelaer 61,74 %
1 NS 4P S = 420 5 22.73
2 NS 3T E+1 -130 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a11 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 45,83 %
3 NS 2P S+1 140 2 9.09
4 NS 3S W+2 -660 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
a10 Virginie Van Damme -Veronique Englebienne 43,75 %
5 NS 5K E = -400 11 50.00
6 NS 4C S+1 450 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.9 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 58,14 %
7 NS 4K W = -130 16 72.73
8 NS 4C S = 420 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
a.8 Angela Carisi -Carla Gervais 46,21 %
9 NS 3C S = 140 15 68.18
10 NS 2P E = -110 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.7 Hugo Baetens -Colette Heerinckx 57,95 %
11 NS 4C S-2 -100 7 31.82
12 NS 3S E+1 -430 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
a.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Dominique Sassen 49,81 %
13 NS 4P N = 620 11 50.00
14 NS 3S W-3 150 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a.5 Christian Deruyck -Therese Roland 39,77 %
15 NS 2P W-1 50 12 54.55
16 NS 2T E-2 200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.4 Christiane Huby -Gerard Cooreman 52,27 %
17 NS 3S W+2 -460 12 54.55
18 NS 5C E-1 50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.3 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 42,80 %
19 NS 4P E-4 400 20 90.91
20 NS 4C N-1 -100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a.2 Serge Alard -Francoise Turin 58,52 %
21 NS 4C E+2 -480 12 54.55
22 NS 5C N-1 -50 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a13 Francine Belet -Marie-Jeanne Boulanger 53,60 %
25 NS 4C S = 420 19 86.36
26 NS 4P W = -620 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
Total : 261,0 / 528 = 49,43 %
PAIRE A.2 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Caroll Pucher
a.2 Serge Alard -Francoise Turin 58,52 %
3 NS 3K W-3 300 13 59.09
4 NS 3S W+3 -690 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a.1 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 39,58 %
5 NS 3K E+1 -130 18 81.82
6 NS 5K N = 400 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a13 Francine Belet -Marie-Jeanne Boulanger 53,60 %
7 NS 3K W+2 -150 10 45.45
8 NS 4C S = 420 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a12 Patrick Gilles -Philippe Dekandelaer 61,74 %
9 NS 4C S-2 -100 2 9.09
10 NS 2P E = -110 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a11 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 45,83 %
11 NS 4C S-1 -50 13 59.09
12 NS 4C E-2 100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a10 Virginie Van Damme -Veronique Englebienne 43,75 %
13 NS 4P N = 620 11 50.00
14 NS 4K S = 130 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.9 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 58,14 %
15 NS 4C S-3 -300 0 0.00
16 NS 2S E+1 -150 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 4,55 %
a.8 Angela Carisi -Carla Gervais 46,21 %
17 NS 3S W+3 -490 3 13.64
18 NS 5T S = 600 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.7 Hugo Baetens -Colette Heerinckx 57,95 %
19 NS 3S E-1 100 10 45.45
20 NS 4C N-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Dominique Sassen 49,81 %
21 NS 4P E+2 -480 12 54.55
22 NS 4C N = 420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.5 Christian Deruyck -Therese Roland 39,77 %
23 NS 4P W = -620 22 100.00
24 NS 5K S-1 -50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a.4 Christiane Huby -Gerard Cooreman 52,27 %
25 NS 4C S-1 -50 8 36.36
26 NS 4P W-1 100 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
Total : 257,0 / 528 = 48,67 %
PAIRE A.9 Jacqueline de Thier -Jeannine Wanderpepen
a.4 Christiane Huby -Gerard Cooreman 52,27 %
1 NS 4P S = 420 5 22.73
2 NS 2T E+2 -130 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.3 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 42,80 %
3 NS 3S N+1 430 22 100.00
4 NS 2P S-2 -200 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a.2 Serge Alard -Francoise Turin 58,52 %
5 NS 6K E-1 50 20 90.91
6 NS 3K N+1 130 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.1 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 39,58 %
7 NS 2K W+3 -150 10 45.45
8 NS 4C S = 420 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a13 Francine Belet -Marie-Jeanne Boulanger 53,60 %
9 NS 4C S-1 -50 8 36.36
10 NS 2P E = -110 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a12 Patrick Gilles -Philippe Dekandelaer 61,74 %
11 NS 4C S-1 -50 13 59.09
12 NS 3S E = -400 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a11 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 45,83 %
13 NS 4P N = 620 11 50.00
14 NS 3K S = 110 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.9 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 58,14 %
17 NS 3S W+2 -460 12 54.55
18 NS 4C W = -420 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a.8 Angela Carisi -Carla Gervais 46,21 %
19 NS 2P E = -110 6 27.27
20 NS 4C N-1 -100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a.7 Hugo Baetens -Colette Heerinckx 57,95 %
21 NS 4P W+2 -480 12 54.55
22 NS 5T N-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Dominique Sassen 49,81 %
23 NS 4P W+2 -680 8 36.36
24 NS 4C E-1 50 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.5 Christian Deruyck -Therese Roland 39,77 %
25 NS 4C S-1 -50 8 36.36
26 NS 3P W-1 100 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
Total : 251,0 / 528 = 47,54 %
PAIRE A.1 Anne Arsac -Catherine de Moffarts
a.1 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 39,58 %
1 NS 3S N+2 460 22 100.00
2 NS 2S W-2 100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 95,45 %
a13 Francine Belet -Marie-Jeanne Boulanger 53,60 %
3 NS 4T S = 130 0 0.00
4 NS 2S W+2 -180 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a12 Patrick Gilles -Philippe Dekandelaer 61,74 %
5 NS 3S E+1 -430 1 4.55
6 NS 3S N-1 -50 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 6,82 %
a11 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 45,83 %
7 NS 3T E = -110 20 90.91
8 NS 4C S-1 -50 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a10 Virginie Van Damme -Veronique Englebienne 43,75 %
9 NS 3C S = 140 15 68.18
10 NS 2P E = -110 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.9 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 58,14 %
11 NS 2P W = -110 3 13.64
12 NS 3S E-2 100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.8 Angela Carisi -Carla Gervais 46,21 %
13 NS 3P N+2 200 0 0.00
14 NS 2K S = 90 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.7 Hugo Baetens -Colette Heerinckx 57,95 %
15 NS 2S N+2 180 18 81.82
16 NS 1S E+2 -150 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Dominique Sassen 49,81 %
17 NS 3S W+1 -430 18 81.82
18 NS 5K W-1 50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a.5 Christian Deruyck -Therese Roland 39,77 %
19 NS 4CxS-2 -600 1 4.55
20 NS 3C N = 140 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.4 Christiane Huby -Gerard Cooreman 52,27 %
21 NS 4P E+2 -480 12 54.55
22 NS 4C N = 420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.3 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 42,80 %
23 NS 4P W+2 -680 8 36.36
24 NS 5K S-1 -50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
Total : 250,0 / 528 = 47,35 %
PAIRE A.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne
a.5 Christian Deruyck -Therese Roland 39,77 %
1 NS 4P S+1 450 17 77.27
2 NS 3T E = -110 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.3 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 42,80 %
5 NS 5K E+1 -420 5 22.73
6 NS 4C S+1 450 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.2 Serge Alard -Francoise Turin 58,52 %
7 NS 3S W = -600 3 13.64
8 NS 4TcN-3 -500 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
a.1 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 39,58 %
9 NS 4C S = 420 19 86.36
10 NS 2P E = -110 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a13 Francine Belet -Marie-Jeanne Boulanger 53,60 %
11 NS 4C S-1 -50 13 59.09
12 NS 3S W = -400 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a12 Patrick Gilles -Philippe Dekandelaer 61,74 %
13 NS 4P N = 620 11 50.00
14 NS 3K S-1 -50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a11 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 45,83 %
15 NS 3C N = 140 14 63.64
16 NS 2S E-1 100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a10 Virginie Van Damme -Veronique Englebienne 43,75 %
17 NS 3S W+2 -460 12 54.55
18 NS 3K W+1 -130 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.9 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 58,14 %
19 NS 3S E = -600 1 4.55
20 NS 4C N-1 -100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
a.8 Angela Carisi -Carla Gervais 46,21 %
21 NS 4P E+2 -480 12 54.55
22 NS 4C N = 420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.7 Hugo Baetens -Colette Heerinckx 57,95 %
23 NS 4P W+1 -650 17 77.27
24 NS 5K S-1 -50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Dominique Sassen 49,81 %
25 NS 4C N = 420 19 86.36
26 NS 4P W = -620 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
Total : 243,0 / 528 = 46,02 %
PAIRE A.5 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens
a.9 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 58,14 %
1 NS 4P S = 420 5 22.73
2 NS 2T E+2 -130 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.8 Angela Carisi -Carla Gervais 46,21 %
3 NS 2T S+3 150 5 22.73
4 NS 2C E+1 -140 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.7 Hugo Baetens -Colette Heerinckx 57,95 %
5 NS 3S E+1 -430 1 4.55
6 NS 5K N-1 -50 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 6,82 %
a.5 Christian Deruyck -Therese Roland 39,77 %
9 NS 4C S = 420 19 86.36
10 NS 2P E = -110 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.4 Christiane Huby -Gerard Cooreman 52,27 %
11 NS 3K W-1 50 18 81.82
12 NS 3S E-2 100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
a.3 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 42,80 %
13 NS 4P N = 620 11 50.00
14 NS 1S W+1 -120 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a.2 Serge Alard -Francoise Turin 58,52 %
15 NS 2P W+1 -140 5 22.73
16 NS 2S E-1 100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.1 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 39,58 %
17 NS 3S W+3 -490 3 13.64
18 NS 5KcW-1 100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a13 Francine Belet -Marie-Jeanne Boulanger 53,60 %
19 NS 3P E-1 100 10 45.45
20 NS 3C N = 140 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a12 Patrick Gilles -Philippe Dekandelaer 61,74 %
21 NS 4P W+2 -480 12 54.55
22 NS 4C N = 420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a11 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 45,83 %
23 NS 4P W+2 -680 8 36.36
24 NS 5K S-1 -50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a10 Virginie Van Damme -Veronique Englebienne 43,75 %
25 NS 4C S-1 -50 8 36.36
26 NS 3P W = -140 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
Total : 238,0 / 528 = 45,08 %
PAIRE A.8 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne
a.2 Serge Alard -Francoise Turin 58,52 %
1 NS 4P S+1 450 17 77.27
2 NS 2T E+2 -130 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.1 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 39,58 %
3 NS 5T S = 400 18 81.82
4 NS 3S W+3 -690 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a13 Francine Belet -Marie-Jeanne Boulanger 53,60 %
5 NS 5K E+1 -420 5 22.73
6 NS 3S N+1 430 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a12 Patrick Gilles -Philippe Dekandelaer 61,74 %
7 NS 5K W = -600 3 13.64
8 NS 5C S-2 -100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
a11 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 45,83 %
9 NS 3S N-3 -150 0 0.00
10 NS 2P E+1 -140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a10 Virginie Van Damme -Veronique Englebienne 43,75 %
11 NS 2P W = -110 3 13.64
12 NS 3S E = -400 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.8 Angela Carisi -Carla Gervais 46,21 %
15 NS 2C E-3 150 16 72.73
16 NS 2S E = -120 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.7 Hugo Baetens -Colette Heerinckx 57,95 %
17 NS 3S W+3 -490 3 13.64
18 NS 5K W-1 50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Dominique Sassen 49,81 %
19 NS 3P E = -140 4 18.18
20 NS 4C N-1 -100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.5 Christian Deruyck -Therese Roland 39,77 %
21 NS 4P W+2 -480 12 54.55
22 NS 5C N-1 -50 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a.4 Christiane Huby -Gerard Cooreman 52,27 %
23 NS 4P W+2 -680 8 36.36
24 NS 4C E = -420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
a.3 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 42,80 %
25 NS 4C S-1 -50 8 36.36
26 NS 3P W = -140 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
Total : 170,0 / 528 = 32,20 %
PAIRE a12 Patrick Gilles -Philippe Dekandelaer
A13 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 49,43 %
1 EO 4P S = 420 17 77.27
2 EO 3T E+1 -130 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 58,52 %
3 EO 5T S = 400 4 18.18
4 EO 2C E+3 -200 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.1 Anne Arsac -Catherine de Moffarts 47,35 %
5 EO 3S E+1 -430 21 95.45
6 EO 3S N-1 -50 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 93,18 %
A.8 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 32,20 %
7 EO 5K W = -600 19 86.36
8 EO 5C S-2 -100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
A.2 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Caroll Pucher 48,67 %
9 EO 4C S-2 -100 20 90.91
10 EO 2P E = -110 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.9 Jacqueline de Thier -Jeannine Wanderpepen 47,54 %
11 EO 4C S-1 -50 9 40.91
12 EO 3S E = -400 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 46,02 %
13 EO 4P N = 620 11 50.00
14 EO 3K S-1 -50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A10 Brigitte Brusselmans -Claire Derieuw 56,63 %
15 EO 2P W = -110 14 63.64
16 EO 2S E = -120 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary 51,14 %
17 EO 3S W+2 -460 10 45.45
18 EO 5T S = 600 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A.5 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 45,08 %
21 EO 4P W+2 -480 10 45.45
22 EO 4C N = 420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A12 Lydia Wildiers -Philippe van der Gracht 58,33 %
23 EO 3S W+3 -690 22 100.00
24 EO 4C E-1 50 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A.6 Michele Berrier -Nicole Leclere 49,62 %
25 EO 4C S-1 -50 14 63.64
26 EO 2P W+1 -140 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
Total : 326,0 / 528 = 61,74 %
PAIRE a.2 Serge Alard -Francoise Turin
A.8 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 32,20 %
1 EO 4P S+1 450 5 22.73
2 EO 2T E+2 -130 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.2 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Caroll Pucher 48,67 %
3 EO 3K W-3 300 9 40.91
4 EO 3S W+3 -690 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A.9 Jacqueline de Thier -Jeannine Wanderpepen 47,54 %
5 EO 6K E-1 50 2 9.09
6 EO 3K N+1 130 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 46,02 %
7 EO 3S W = -600 19 86.36
8 EO 4TcN-3 -500 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
A10 Brigitte Brusselmans -Claire Derieuw 56,63 %
9 EO 4C S-1 -50 14 63.64
10 EO 3P E-1 100 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary 51,14 %
11 EO 3S N+1 430 0 0.00
12 EO 3S W+1 -430 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A11 Sophie Tilemans -Annette Fobe 59,47 %
13 EO 4P N = 620 11 50.00
14 EO 3K S-1 -50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A.5 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 45,08 %
15 EO 2P W+1 -140 17 77.27
16 EO 2S E-1 100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A12 Lydia Wildiers -Philippe van der Gracht 58,33 %
17 EO 3S W+3 -490 19 86.36
18 EO 4KcW = -510 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 93,18 %
A.6 Michele Berrier -Nicole Leclere 49,62 %
19 EO 4P E-2 200 8 36.36
20 EO 3C N-1 -100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 49,43 %
21 EO 4C E+2 -480 10 45.45
22 EO 5C N-1 -50 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 58,52 %
23 EO 4P W+2 -680 14 63.64
24 EO 4C E-1 50 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 309,0 / 528 = 58,52 %
PAIRE a.9 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart
A.5 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 45,08 %
1 EO 4P S = 420 17 77.27
2 EO 2T E+2 -130 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A12 Lydia Wildiers -Philippe van der Gracht 58,33 %
3 EO 4T S+2 170 14 63.64
4 EO 2P S-3 -300 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.6 Michele Berrier -Nicole Leclere 49,62 %
5 EO 5K E = -400 11 50.00
6 EO 5K N = 400 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 49,43 %
7 EO 4K W = -130 6 27.27
8 EO 4C S = 420 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 58,52 %
9 EO 4C S-1 -50 14 63.64
10 EO 2P E = -110 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.1 Anne Arsac -Catherine de Moffarts 47,35 %
11 EO 2P W = -110 19 86.36
12 EO 3S E-2 100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.2 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Caroll Pucher 48,67 %
15 EO 4C S-3 -300 22 100.00
16 EO 2S E+1 -150 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 95,45 %
A.9 Jacqueline de Thier -Jeannine Wanderpepen 47,54 %
17 EO 3S W+2 -460 10 45.45
18 EO 4C W = -420 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 46,02 %
19 EO 3S E = -600 21 95.45
20 EO 4C N-1 -100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
A10 Brigitte Brusselmans -Claire Derieuw 56,63 %
21 EO 4P W+2 -480 10 45.45
22 EO 4C N+2 480 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary 51,14 %
23 EO 4P W+2 -680 14 63.64
24 EO 4CcE-1 100 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A11 Sophie Tilemans -Annette Fobe 59,47 %
25 EO 4C S-1 -50 14 63.64
26 EO 2P W+2 -170 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
Total : 307,0 / 528 = 58,14 %
PAIRE a.7 Hugo Baetens -Colette Heerinckx
A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary 51,14 %
1 EO 4P S+1 450 5 22.73
2 EO 2T E+2 -130 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A11 Sophie Tilemans -Annette Fobe 59,47 %
3 EO 3K W-3 300 9 40.91
4 EO 2C E+1 -140 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.5 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 45,08 %
5 EO 3S E+1 -430 21 95.45
6 EO 5K N-1 -50 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 93,18 %
A12 Lydia Wildiers -Philippe van der Gracht 58,33 %
7 EO 2K W+2 -130 6 27.27
8 EO 4C S = 420 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 49,43 %
11 EO 4C S-2 -100 15 68.18
12 EO 3S E+1 -430 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 58,52 %
13 EO 4P N = 620 11 50.00
14 EO 2P N-2 -100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A.1 Anne Arsac -Catherine de Moffarts 47,35 %
15 EO 2S N+2 180 4 18.18
16 EO 1S E+2 -150 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.8 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 32,20 %
17 EO 3S W+3 -490 19 86.36
18 EO 5K W-1 50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A.2 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Caroll Pucher 48,67 %
19 EO 3S E-1 100 12 54.55
20 EO 4C N-2 -200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.9 Jacqueline de Thier -Jeannine Wanderpepen 47,54 %
21 EO 4P W+2 -480 10 45.45
22 EO 5T N-2 -100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 46,02 %
23 EO 4P W+1 -650 5 22.73
24 EO 5K S-1 -50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A10 Brigitte Brusselmans -Claire Derieuw 56,63 %
25 EO 4C S = 420 3 13.64
26 EO 3P W = -140 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
Total : 306,0 / 528 = 57,95 %
PAIRE a13 Francine Belet -Marie-Jeanne Boulanger
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 58,52 %
1 EO 4P S+1 450 5 22.73
2 EO 2C W = -110 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.1 Anne Arsac -Catherine de Moffarts 47,35 %
3 EO 4T S = 130 22 100.00
4 EO 2S W+2 -180 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A.8 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 32,20 %
5 EO 5K E+1 -420 17 77.27
6 EO 3S N+1 430 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A.2 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Caroll Pucher 48,67 %
7 EO 3K W+2 -150 12 54.55
8 EO 4C S = 420 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.9 Jacqueline de Thier -Jeannine Wanderpepen 47,54 %
9 EO 4C S-1 -50 14 63.64
10 EO 2P E = -110 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 46,02 %
11 EO 4C S-1 -50 9 40.91
12 EO 3S W = -400 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A10 Brigitte Brusselmans -Claire Derieuw 56,63 %
13 EO 4P N = 620 11 50.00
14 EO 3T E-1 50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary 51,14 %
15 EO 3C S-1 -100 12 54.55
16 EO 2S E+1 -150 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A11 Sophie Tilemans -Annette Fobe 59,47 %
17 EO 3S W = -400 1 4.55
18 EO 3P N-1 -100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.5 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 45,08 %
19 EO 3P E-1 100 12 54.55
20 EO 3C N = 140 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.6 Michele Berrier -Nicole Leclere 49,62 %
23 EO 4P W+2 -680 14 63.64
24 EO 1C E+2 -140 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 49,43 %
25 EO 4C S = 420 3 13.64
26 EO 4P W = -620 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
Total : 283,0 / 528 = 53,60 %
PAIRE a.4 Christiane Huby -Gerard Cooreman
A.9 Jacqueline de Thier -Jeannine Wanderpepen 47,54 %
1 EO 4P S = 420 17 77.27
2 EO 2T E+2 -130 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A10 Brigitte Brusselmans -Claire Derieuw 56,63 %
5 EO 5K E = -400 11 50.00
6 EO 3S N-1 -50 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary 51,14 %
7 EO 5K W = -600 19 86.36
8 EO 4PcE+1 -690 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 93,18 %
A11 Sophie Tilemans -Annette Fobe 59,47 %
9 EO 4C S-1 -50 14 63.64
10 EO 3P E-1 100 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.5 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 45,08 %
11 EO 3K W-1 50 4 18.18
12 EO 3S E-2 100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
A12 Lydia Wildiers -Philippe van der Gracht 58,33 %
13 EO 4P N+1 650 0 0.00
14 EO 2P N = 110 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
A.6 Michele Berrier -Nicole Leclere 49,62 %
15 EO 2P W+1 -140 17 77.27
16 EO 2S E = -120 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 49,43 %
17 EO 3S W+2 -460 10 45.45
18 EO 5C E-1 50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 58,52 %
19 EO 4P E-1 100 12 54.55
20 EO 3C N = 140 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.1 Anne Arsac -Catherine de Moffarts 47,35 %
21 EO 4P E+2 -480 10 45.45
22 EO 4C N = 420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.8 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 32,20 %
23 EO 4P W+2 -680 14 63.64
24 EO 4C E = -420 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
A.2 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Caroll Pucher 48,67 %
25 EO 4C S-1 -50 14 63.64
26 EO 4P W-1 100 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
Total : 276,0 / 528 = 52,27 %
PAIRE a.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Dominique Sassen
A10 Brigitte Brusselmans -Claire Derieuw 56,63 %
1 EO 4P N = 420 17 77.27
2 EO 3T E+1 -130 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary 51,14 %
3 EO 4T S+1 150 17 77.27
4 EO 5T W+1 -620 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A11 Sophie Tilemans -Annette Fobe 59,47 %
5 EO 4K E+1 -150 6 27.27
6 EO 3S N+2 460 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A12 Lydia Wildiers -Philippe van der Gracht 58,33 %
9 EO 4C S-1 -50 14 63.64
10 EO 3P E-1 100 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.6 Michele Berrier -Nicole Leclere 49,62 %
11 EO 3TcE = -470 22 100.00
12 EO 3S W-1 50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 49,43 %
13 EO 4P N = 620 11 50.00
14 EO 3S W-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 58,52 %
15 EO 4C N = 620 2 9.09
16 EO 2S E = -120 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.1 Anne Arsac -Catherine de Moffarts 47,35 %
17 EO 3S W+1 -430 4 18.18
18 EO 5K W-1 50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.8 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 32,20 %
19 EO 3P E = -140 18 81.82
20 EO 4C N-1 -100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.2 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Caroll Pucher 48,67 %
21 EO 4P E+2 -480 10 45.45
22 EO 4C N = 420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.9 Jacqueline de Thier -Jeannine Wanderpepen 47,54 %
23 EO 4P W+2 -680 14 63.64
24 EO 4C E-1 50 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 46,02 %
25 EO 4C N = 420 3 13.64
26 EO 4P W = -620 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
Total : 263,0 / 528 = 49,81 %
PAIRE a.8 Angela Carisi -Carla Gervais
A11 Sophie Tilemans -Annette Fobe 59,47 %
1 EO 4P N = 420 17 77.27
2 EO 3S W-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.5 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 45,08 %
3 EO 2T S+3 150 17 77.27
4 EO 2C E+1 -140 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A12 Lydia Wildiers -Philippe van der Gracht 58,33 %
5 EO 2C S+1 140 0 0.00
6 EO 4C S+2 480 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 2,27 %
A.6 Michele Berrier -Nicole Leclere 49,62 %
7 EO 3K W+1 -130 6 27.27
8 EO 4C S-1 -50 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 49,43 %
9 EO 3C S = 140 7 31.82
10 EO 2P E = -110 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.1 Anne Arsac -Catherine de Moffarts 47,35 %
13 EO 3P N+2 200 22 100.00
14 EO 2K S = 90 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.8 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 32,20 %
15 EO 2C E-3 150 6 27.27
16 EO 2S E = -120 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.2 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Caroll Pucher 48,67 %
17 EO 3S W+3 -490 19 86.36
18 EO 5T S = 600 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.9 Jacqueline de Thier -Jeannine Wanderpepen 47,54 %
19 EO 2P E = -110 16 72.73
20 EO 4C N-1 -100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 46,02 %
21 EO 4P E+2 -480 10 45.45
22 EO 4C N = 420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A10 Brigitte Brusselmans -Claire Derieuw 56,63 %
23 EO 3S W+1 -630 2 9.09
24 EO 4K S = 130 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 4,55 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary 51,14 %
25 EO 3T S-5 -250 22 100.00
26 EO 2P W+3 -200 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
Total : 244,0 / 528 = 46,21 %
PAIRE a11 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert
A.6 Michele Berrier -Nicole Leclere 49,62 %
1 EO 4P S = 420 17 77.27
2 EO Pass Passe 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 49,43 %
3 EO 2P S+1 140 20 90.91
4 EO 3S W+2 -660 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 58,52 %
5 EO 5K E = -400 11 50.00
6 EO 4C S+2 480 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A.1 Anne Arsac -Catherine de Moffarts 47,35 %
7 EO 3T E = -110 2 9.09
8 EO 4C S-1 -50 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.8 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 32,20 %
9 EO 3S N-3 -150 22 100.00
10 EO 2P E+1 -140 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 100,00 %
A.2 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Caroll Pucher 48,67 %
11 EO 4C S-1 -50 9 40.91
12 EO 4C E-2 100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A.9 Jacqueline de Thier -Jeannine Wanderpepen 47,54 %
13 EO 4P N = 620 11 50.00
14 EO 3K S = 110 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 46,02 %
15 EO 3C N = 140 8 36.36
16 EO 2S E-1 100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary 51,14 %
19 EO 3P E-4 400 2 9.09
20 EO 3C N+1 170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 4,55 %
A11 Sophie Tilemans -Annette Fobe 59,47 %
21 EO 4C E+2 -480 10 45.45
22 EO 4C N+1 450 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.5 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 45,08 %
23 EO 4P W+2 -680 14 63.64
24 EO 5K S-1 -50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A12 Lydia Wildiers -Philippe van der Gracht 58,33 %
25 EO 4C S = 420 3 13.64
26 EO 4P W = -620 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
Total : 242,0 / 528 = 45,83 %
PAIRE a10 Virginie Van Damme -Veronique Englebienne
A12 Lydia Wildiers -Philippe van der Gracht 58,33 %
1 EO 3S N+1 430 10 45.45
2 EO 3S W-1 50 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.6 Michele Berrier -Nicole Leclere 49,62 %
3 EO 5T S = 400 4 18.18
4 EO 6C E-4 400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 49,43 %
5 EO 5K E = -400 11 50.00
6 EO 4C S+1 450 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 58,52 %
7 EO 2S W+1 -150 12 54.55
8 EO 4C S-1 -50 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.1 Anne Arsac -Catherine de Moffarts 47,35 %
9 EO 3C S = 140 7 31.82
10 EO 2P E = -110 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.8 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 32,20 %
11 EO 2P W = -110 19 86.36
12 EO 3S E = -400 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.2 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Caroll Pucher 48,67 %
13 EO 4P N = 620 11 50.00
14 EO 4K S = 130 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 46,02 %
17 EO 3S W+2 -460 10 45.45
18 EO 3K W+1 -130 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A10 Brigitte Brusselmans -Claire Derieuw 56,63 %
19 EO 4P E-3 300 6 27.27
20 EO 4C N-1 -100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary 51,14 %
21 EO 4P W+2 -480 10 45.45
22 EO 4C N = 420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A11 Sophie Tilemans -Annette Fobe 59,47 %
23 EO 4P W+1 -650 5 22.73
24 EO 5C E-2 100 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
A.5 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 45,08 %
25 EO 4C S-1 -50 14 63.64
26 EO 3P W = -140 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
Total : 231,0 / 528 = 43,75 %
PAIRE a.3 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant
A.9 Jacqueline de Thier -Jeannine Wanderpepen 47,54 %
3 EO 3S N+1 430 0 0.00
4 EO 2P S-2 -200 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 46,02 %
5 EO 5K E+1 -420 17 77.27
6 EO 4C S+1 450 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A10 Brigitte Brusselmans -Claire Derieuw 56,63 %
7 EO 5K W = -600 19 86.36
8 EO 5PcE-2 300 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary 51,14 %
9 EO 3S S+1 430 0 0.00
10 EO 3P E-1 100 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 6,82 %
A11 Sophie Tilemans -Annette Fobe 59,47 %
11 EO 3C N-1 -50 9 40.91
12 EO 3S W-1 50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.5 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 45,08 %
13 EO 4P N = 620 11 50.00
14 EO 1S W+1 -120 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A12 Lydia Wildiers -Philippe van der Gracht 58,33 %
15 EO 3S N+1 630 0 0.00
16 EO 2S E-1 100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
A.6 Michele Berrier -Nicole Leclere 49,62 %
17 EO 3S W+2 -460 10 45.45
18 EO 5KcW-1 100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 49,43 %
19 EO 4P E-4 400 2 9.09
20 EO 4C N-1 -100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 58,52 %
21 EO 6C E = -980 22 100.00
22 EO 4C N+2 480 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.1 Anne Arsac -Catherine de Moffarts 47,35 %
23 EO 4P W+2 -680 14 63.64
24 EO 5K S-1 -50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A.8 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 32,20 %
25 EO 4C S-1 -50 14 63.64
26 EO 3P W = -140 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
Total : 226,0 / 528 = 42,80 %
PAIRE a.5 Christian Deruyck -Therese Roland
A.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 46,02 %
1 EO 4P S+1 450 5 22.73
2 EO 3T E = -110 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A10 Brigitte Brusselmans -Claire Derieuw 56,63 %
3 EO 1S N+4 210 12 54.55
4 EO 3S W-1 100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A11 Sophie Tilemans -Annette Fobe 59,47 %
7 EO 3T E-2 200 0 0.00
8 EO 4C S-1 -50 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A.5 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 45,08 %
9 EO 4C S = 420 3 13.64
10 EO 2P E = -110 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A12 Lydia Wildiers -Philippe van der Gracht 58,33 %
11 EO 4C S-2 -100 15 68.18
12 EO 3S W = -400 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A.6 Michele Berrier -Nicole Leclere 49,62 %
13 EO 4P N = 620 11 50.00
14 EO 2P N-1 -50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 49,43 %
15 EO 2P W-1 50 10 45.45
16 EO 2T E-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 58,52 %
17 EO 3S W = -400 1 4.55
18 EO 5T S+1 620 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 2,27 %
A.1 Anne Arsac -Catherine de Moffarts 47,35 %
19 EO 4CxS-2 -600 21 95.45
20 EO 3C N = 140 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.8 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 32,20 %
21 EO 4P W+2 -480 10 45.45
22 EO 5C N-1 -50 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A.2 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Caroll Pucher 48,67 %
23 EO 4P W = -620 0 0.00
24 EO 5K S-1 -50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.9 Jacqueline de Thier -Jeannine Wanderpepen 47,54 %
25 EO 4C S-1 -50 14 63.64
26 EO 3P W-1 100 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
Total : 210,0 / 528 = 39,77 %
PAIRE a.1 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor
A.1 Anne Arsac -Catherine de Moffarts 47,35 %
1 EO 3S N+2 460 0 0.00
2 EO 2S W-2 100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 4,55 %
A.8 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 32,20 %
3 EO 5T S = 400 4 18.18
4 EO 3S W+3 -690 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.2 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Caroll Pucher 48,67 %
5 EO 3K E+1 -130 4 18.18
6 EO 5K N = 400 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.9 Jacqueline de Thier -Jeannine Wanderpepen 47,54 %
7 EO 2K W+3 -150 12 54.55
8 EO 4C S = 420 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 46,02 %
9 EO 4C S = 420 3 13.64
10 EO 2P E = -110 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A10 Brigitte Brusselmans -Claire Derieuw 56,63 %
11 EO 3C N = 140 2 9.09
12 EO 2C E+1 -140 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary 51,14 %
13 EO 4P N = 620 11 50.00
14 EO 2K S+2 130 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A11 Sophie Tilemans -Annette Fobe 59,47 %
15 EO 3C S-2 -200 20 90.91
16 EO 2S E = -120 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.5 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 45,08 %
17 EO 3S W+3 -490 19 86.36
18 EO 5KcW-1 100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A12 Lydia Wildiers -Philippe van der Gracht 58,33 %
19 EO 4P E-4 400 2 9.09
20 EO 4C N-1 -100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.6 Michele Berrier -Nicole Leclere 49,62 %
21 EO 4P E+2 -480 10 45.45
22 EO 4C N+1 450 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 58,52 %
25 EO 4C S-1 -50 14 63.64
26 EO 3C N-1 -100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
Total : 209,0 / 528 = 39,58 %
|