B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 61,23 A.1 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski
--- 2 60,66 A11 Annette Fobe -Myriam de Timary
--- 3 59,62 A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor
--- 4 55,55 A.9 Noelle Fosse -Martine Zens
--- 5 52,46 A.5 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin
--- 6 49,11 A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia
--- 7 48,43 A.6 Andre Delacroix -Anne Van den Berge
--- 8 48,11 A12 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Wanderpepen
--- 9 47,22 A.3 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens
--- 10 45,02 A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier
--- 11 44,32 A13 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger
--- 12 44,28 A10 Marianne Falla -Patrick Gilles
--- 13 42,48 A.8 Lydia Luyten -Prisca Tondreau
--- 14 41,53 A14 Anne de Wasseige -Marguerite Verstraeten
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 65,28 a.2 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver
--- 2 62,35 a10 Jean de Villenfagne -Gaetan van de Werve
--- 3 58,28 a.4 Serge Alard -Gerard Cooreman
--- 4 52,97 a.5 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw
--- 5 51,14 a14 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
--- 6 50,81 a.1 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot
--- 7 49,62 a12 Alyona Pascaru -Rita Swinnen
--- 8 48,62 a.3 Luc Rampaer -Bernard Brisbois
--- 9 48,35 a.6 Ghislain de Schaetzen -Veronique Herry
--- 10 45,02 a11 Simone Munsterhjelm -Carl Louis Van Brandt
--- 11 43,75 a13 Edith Close -Jan Sassen
--- 12 41,99 a.7 Michel Lievens -Chantal de Lichtervelde
--- 13 40,95 a.9 Nicole Leclere -Madeleine Gabriel
--- 14 40,85 a.8 Philippe d'Hoop -Juan del Marmol
PAIRE A.1 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski
a.1 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 50,81 %
1 NS 3P N-1 -50 13 59.09
2 NS 2K S+1 110 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a14 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 51,14 %
3 NS 4C W+1 -650 7 31.82
4 NS 1S S = 90 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a13 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 43,75 %
5 NS 3S W-1 50 22 100.00
6 NS 3S S-2 -100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a12 Alyona Pascaru -Rita Swinnen 49,62 %
7 NS 3K E-3 300 22 100.00
8 NS 4C W-1 50 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 95,45 %
a11 Simone Munsterhjelm -Carl Louis Van Brandt 45,02 %
9 NS 4P S = 420 14 63.64
10 NS 3C N-1 -100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a10 Jean de Villenfagne -Gaetan van de Werve 62,35 %
11 NS 5T W-2 100 6 27.27
12 NS 4C S+1 650 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.9 Nicole Leclere -Madeleine Gabriel 40,95 %
13 NS 1S N+1 120 21 95.45
14 NS 3S E = -400 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.7 Michel Lievens -Chantal de Lichtervelde 41,99 %
15 NS 4P N+1 650 14 63.64
16 NS 2T W+1 -110 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.6 Ghislain de Schaetzen -Veronique Herry 48,35 %
17 NS 1S N+1 120 22 100.00
18 NS 4C W = -420 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
a.5 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 52,97 %
19 NS 2K E = -90 4 18.18
20 NS 3S S+1 630 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.4 Serge Alard -Gerard Cooreman 58,28 %
21 NS 2P N = 110 19 86.36
22 NS 4C E = -620 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 48,41 %
a.3 Luc Rampaer -Bernard Brisbois 48,62 %
23 NS 5T N-1 -100 5 22.73
24 NS 4P N = 420 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
Total : 323,3 / 528 = 61,23 %
PAIRE A11 Annette Fobe -Myriam de Timary
a.7 Michel Lievens -Chantal de Lichtervelde 41,99 %
1 NS 3P N-1 -50 13 59.09
2 NS 1S E-2 100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.6 Ghislain de Schaetzen -Veronique Herry 48,35 %
3 NS 3S E = -600 22 100.00
4 NS 1P E+2 -140 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a.5 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 52,97 %
5 NS 3S E = -400 12 54.55
6 NS 3S S-2 -100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a.3 Luc Rampaer -Bernard Brisbois 48,62 %
7 NS 2C W-2 200 19 86.36
8 NS 4C W-1 50 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
a.2 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver 65,28 %
9 NS 4P S-1 -50 2 9.09
10 NS 3P E-1 100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.1 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 50,81 %
11 NS 3T W-1 50 2 9.09
12 NS 4C S+2 680 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a14 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 51,14 %
13 NS 2T E-1 100 10 45.45
14 NS 3S W-2 100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a13 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 43,75 %
15 NS 4C N+1 650 14 63.64
16 NS 2P N = 110 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
a11 Simone Munsterhjelm -Carl Louis Van Brandt 45,02 %
21 NS 4C W-3 150 22 100.00
22 NS 6C E-2 200 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 82,50 %
a10 Jean de Villenfagne -Gaetan van de Werve 62,35 %
23 NS 3S S-1 -100 5 22.73
24 NS 3S S-1 -50 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
a.9 Nicole Leclere -Madeleine Gabriel 40,95 %
25 NS 3P S+1 170 5 22.73
26 NS 3T E = -110 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a.8 Philippe d'Hoop -Juan del Marmol 40,85 %
27 NS 4P S+1 450 22 100.00
28 NS 3S W-1 50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
Total : 320,3 / 528 = 60,66 %
PAIRE A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor
a.6 Ghislain de Schaetzen -Veronique Herry 48,35 %
1 NS 4P N-2 -100 6 27.27
2 NS 1S E-1 50 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.4 Serge Alard -Gerard Cooreman 58,28 %
7 NS 2P N+1 140 12 54.55
8 NS 4C W+1 -450 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.3 Luc Rampaer -Bernard Brisbois 48,62 %
9 NS 4P S = 420 14 63.64
10 NS 3T S-2 -200 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.2 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver 65,28 %
11 NS 4PcS-3 -500 0 0.00
12 NS 3S S = 600 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.1 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 50,81 %
13 NS 1S S+1 120 21 95.45
14 NS 3S E = -400 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a14 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 51,14 %
15 NS 6P N-1 -100 5 22.73
16 NS 3K N = 110 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a13 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 43,75 %
17 NS 1S N = 90 19 86.36
18 NS 4C W = -420 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a12 Alyona Pascaru -Rita Swinnen 49,62 %
19 NS 3C W-3 300 22 100.00
20 NS 3S S+1 630 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
a10 Jean de Villenfagne -Gaetan van de Werve 62,35 %
21 NS 4C W-2 100 16 72.73
22 NS 6C E-3 300 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 83,64 %
a.9 Nicole Leclere -Madeleine Gabriel 40,95 %
23 NS 4T N = 130 14 63.64
24 NS 3S S+1 430 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a.8 Philippe d'Hoop -Juan del Marmol 40,85 %
25 NS 4P S = 420 18 81.82
26 NS 4T E-1 100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
a.7 Michel Lievens -Chantal de Lichtervelde 41,99 %
27 NS 4P S = 420 12 54.55
28 NS 3S W-1 50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
Total : 314,8 / 528 = 59,62 %
PAIRE A.9 Noelle Fosse -Martine Zens
a.3 Luc Rampaer -Bernard Brisbois 48,62 %
1 NS 4K W-1 50 18 81.82
2 NS 1S E-1 50 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.1 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 50,81 %
3 NS 4C W+1 -650 7 31.82
4 NS 1S S = 90 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a14 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 51,14 %
5 NS 3S E = -400 12 54.55
6 NS 3K N+1 130 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a13 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 43,75 %
7 NS 2P N+1 140 12 54.55
8 NS 4C W-1 50 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a12 Alyona Pascaru -Rita Swinnen 49,62 %
9 NS 4P S = 420 14 63.64
10 NS 3C N-3 -300 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a11 Simone Munsterhjelm -Carl Louis Van Brandt 45,02 %
11 NS 4T W-4 200 15 68.18
12 NS 4C S+1 650 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a.9 Nicole Leclere -Madeleine Gabriel 40,95 %
17 NS 1S N-1 -50 12 54.55
18 NS 4C W = -420 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a.8 Philippe d'Hoop -Juan del Marmol 40,85 %
19 NS 2K E-1 100 12 54.55
20 NS 3S S+1 630 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.7 Michel Lievens -Chantal de Lichtervelde 41,99 %
21 NS 3C E-1 50 10 45.45
22 NS 6C E-2 200 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 55,23 %
a.6 Ghislain de Schaetzen -Veronique Herry 48,35 %
23 NS 3T N+1 130 14 63.64
24 NS 3S S = 400 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.5 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 52,97 %
25 NS 4P S = 420 18 81.82
26 NS 3T E = -110 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.4 Serge Alard -Gerard Cooreman 58,28 %
27 NS 4P S = 420 12 54.55
28 NS 3S W+1 -430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
Total : 293,3 / 528 = 55,55 %
PAIRE A.5 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin
a.8 Philippe d'Hoop -Juan del Marmol 40,85 %
1 NS 3P N-1 -50 13 59.09
2 NS 1S E-2 100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.7 Michel Lievens -Chantal de Lichtervelde 41,99 %
3 NS 4C W = -620 18 81.82
4 NS 1P E+2 -140 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a.5 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 52,97 %
9 NS 4P S = 420 14 63.64
10 NS 3C N-3 -300 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.4 Serge Alard -Gerard Cooreman 58,28 %
11 NS 4T W-2 100 6 27.27
12 NS 4C S+1 650 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.3 Luc Rampaer -Bernard Brisbois 48,62 %
13 NS 2C S-1 -100 2 9.09
14 NS 3S W-3 150 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.2 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver 65,28 %
15 NS 6P N-3 -300 0 0.00
16 NS 3T E-1 100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.1 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 50,81 %
17 NS 2C W = -110 5 22.73
18 NS 4C W = -420 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a14 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 51,14 %
19 NS 2K E-1 100 12 54.55
20 NS 3S S+2 660 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a13 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 43,75 %
21 NS 3C E-1 50 10 45.45
22 NS 50%50% Ajust 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a11 Simone Munsterhjelm -Carl Louis Van Brandt 45,02 %
23 NS 5T N-2 -200 0 0.00
24 NS 3S S+1 430 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a10 Jean de Villenfagne -Gaetan van de Werve 62,35 %
25 NS 5C E-2 200 11 50.00
26 NS 2T E+1 -110 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.9 Nicole Leclere -Madeleine Gabriel 40,95 %
27 NS 4P S = 420 12 54.55
28 NS 3S W-2 100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
Total : 277,0 / 528 = 52,46 %
PAIRE A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia
a12 Alyona Pascaru -Rita Swinnen 49,62 %
1 NS 4C E-2 100 20 90.91
2 NS 2S N = 120 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
a11 Simone Munsterhjelm -Carl Louis Van Brandt 45,02 %
3 NS 4C W = -620 18 81.82
4 NS 1P E+2 -140 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a10 Jean de Villenfagne -Gaetan van de Werve 62,35 %
5 NS 3S W+1 -430 1 4.55
6 NS 3S S-2 -100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
a.9 Nicole Leclere -Madeleine Gabriel 40,95 %
7 NS 3P N-1 -100 2 9.09
8 NS 4C W+1 -450 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
a.7 Michel Lievens -Chantal de Lichtervelde 41,99 %
13 NS 2K N+1 110 15 68.18
14 NS 3S W-2 100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a.6 Ghislain de Schaetzen -Veronique Herry 48,35 %
15 NS 5P N = 650 14 63.64
16 NS 1S W+1 -120 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.5 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 52,97 %
17 NS 1S N-1 -50 12 54.55
18 NS 4C W = -420 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a.4 Serge Alard -Gerard Cooreman 58,28 %
19 NS 2K E-1 100 12 54.55
20 NS 3S S = 600 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.3 Luc Rampaer -Bernard Brisbois 48,62 %
21 NS 2P N-2 -200 1 4.55
22 NS 3S E-2 200 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 34,77 %
a.2 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver 65,28 %
23 NS 4P E-4 400 22 100.00
24 NS 3P N = 140 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a.1 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 50,81 %
25 NS 3T W-3 300 14 63.64
26 NS 2T E+1 -110 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a13 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 43,75 %
27 NS 4P S = 420 12 54.55
28 NS 3S W = -400 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
Total : 259,3 / 528 = 49,11 %
PAIRE A.6 Andre Delacroix -Anne Van den Berge
a10 Jean de Villenfagne -Gaetan van de Werve 62,35 %
1 NS 3P N-3 -150 1 4.55
2 NS 1S E-3 150 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.9 Nicole Leclere -Madeleine Gabriel 40,95 %
3 NS 4C W = -620 18 81.82
4 NS 2K W+1 -110 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a.8 Philippe d'Hoop -Juan del Marmol 40,85 %
5 NS 3S W = -400 12 54.55
6 NS 1S N+3 180 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a.6 Ghislain de Schaetzen -Veronique Herry 48,35 %
11 NS 4T E-3 150 11 50.00
12 NS 4C S+1 650 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.5 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 52,97 %
13 NS 2C S = 110 15 68.18
14 NS 3S W+2 -460 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a.4 Serge Alard -Gerard Cooreman 58,28 %
15 NS 4P N+2 680 22 100.00
16 NS 1S W = -90 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
a.3 Luc Rampaer -Bernard Brisbois 48,62 %
17 NS 2C W = -110 5 22.73
18 NS 5C W-1 50 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.2 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver 65,28 %
19 NS 2K E = -90 4 18.18
20 NS 3S S+1 630 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.1 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 50,81 %
21 NS 2P N-1 -100 4 18.18
22 NS 4C E-1 100 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 26,59 %
a14 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 51,14 %
23 NS 4T N = 130 14 63.64
24 NS 3S N-1 -50 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a12 Alyona Pascaru -Rita Swinnen 49,62 %
25 NS 2P S+2 170 5 22.73
26 NS 2T E+2 -130 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
a11 Simone Munsterhjelm -Carl Louis Van Brandt 45,02 %
27 NS 4P S = 420 12 54.55
28 NS 3S W = -400 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
Total : 255,7 / 528 = 48,43 %
PAIRE A12 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Wanderpepen
a.9 Nicole Leclere -Madeleine Gabriel 40,95 %
1 NS 4P N-2 -100 6 27.27
2 NS 1S E-2 100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.8 Philippe d'Hoop -Juan del Marmol 40,85 %
3 NS 4C W+1 -650 7 31.82
4 NS 1S S-1 -100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.7 Michel Lievens -Chantal de Lichtervelde 41,99 %
5 NS 3S E = -400 12 54.55
6 NS 3S N+1 430 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.6 Ghislain de Schaetzen -Veronique Herry 48,35 %
7 NS 2P N+2 170 16 72.73
8 NS 4C W = -420 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a.4 Serge Alard -Gerard Cooreman 58,28 %
9 NS 4P S = 420 14 63.64
10 NS 2P E = -110 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.3 Luc Rampaer -Bernard Brisbois 48,62 %
11 NS 4T W-2 100 6 27.27
12 NS 4C S+2 680 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.2 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver 65,28 %
13 NS 1S N = 90 7 31.82
14 NS 3S W+1 -430 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a.1 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 50,81 %
15 NS 6P N-1 -100 5 22.73
16 NS 1S W = -90 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a14 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 51,14 %
17 NS 2C W+1 -140 1 4.55
18 NS 4C W+2 -480 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 2,27 %
a12 Alyona Pascaru -Rita Swinnen 49,62 %
23 NS 3T N+1 130 14 63.64
24 NS 3S S = 400 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a11 Simone Munsterhjelm -Carl Louis Van Brandt 45,02 %
25 NS 3P S+1 170 5 22.73
26 NS 3T E = -110 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a10 Jean de Villenfagne -Gaetan van de Werve 62,35 %
27 NS 4P S = 420 12 54.55
28 NS 3S W = -400 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
Total : 254,0 / 528 = 48,11 %
PAIRE A.3 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens
a.3 Luc Rampaer -Bernard Brisbois 48,62 %
5 NS 3S W+1 -430 1 4.55
6 NS 1S S+3 180 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.2 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver 65,28 %
7 NS 2K E+1 -110 0 0.00
8 NS 4C W+1 -450 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
a.1 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 50,81 %
9 NS 4P S = 420 14 63.64
10 NS 3C N-4 -400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a14 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 51,14 %
11 NS 5T W-3 150 11 50.00
12 NS 4C S+1 650 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a13 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 43,75 %
13 NS 2K N+1 110 15 68.18
14 NS 3S W+1 -430 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a12 Alyona Pascaru -Rita Swinnen 49,62 %
15 NS 6P N-2 -200 2 9.09
16 NS 1S W = -90 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a11 Simone Munsterhjelm -Carl Louis Van Brandt 45,02 %
17 NS 1S N = 90 19 86.36
18 NS 4C W = -420 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a.9 Nicole Leclere -Madeleine Gabriel 40,95 %
19 NS 2K E-2 200 19 86.36
20 NS 3S S+1 630 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a.8 Philippe d'Hoop -Juan del Marmol 40,85 %
21 NS 3C E-1 50 10 45.45
22 NS 4C E = -620 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 27,95 %
a.7 Michel Lievens -Chantal de Lichtervelde 41,99 %
23 NS 3P E-3 300 20 90.91
24 NS 3S S = 400 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.6 Ghislain de Schaetzen -Veronique Herry 48,35 %
25 NS 4P S = 420 18 81.82
26 NS 2S E+1 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.5 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 52,97 %
27 NS 4P S = 420 12 54.55
28 NS 3S W-1 50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
Total : 249,3 / 528 = 47,22 %
PAIRE A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier
a.2 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver 65,28 %
3 NS 4P W+1 -650 7 31.82
4 NS 1P E+2 -140 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a.1 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 50,81 %
5 NS 3S E = -400 12 54.55
6 NS 3S S-2 -100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a14 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 51,14 %
7 NS 2P N+1 140 12 54.55
8 NS 4C W+1 -450 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a13 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 43,75 %
9 NS 4P S = 420 14 63.64
10 NS 3C N-3 -300 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a12 Alyona Pascaru -Rita Swinnen 49,62 %
11 NS 2PcS = 470 18 81.82
12 NS 4C S+2 680 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
a11 Simone Munsterhjelm -Carl Louis Van Brandt 45,02 %
13 NS 1S N = 90 7 31.82
14 NS 5T E-1 50 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a10 Jean de Villenfagne -Gaetan van de Werve 62,35 %
15 NS 5P N = 650 14 63.64
16 NS 1S W+1 -120 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.8 Philippe d'Hoop -Juan del Marmol 40,85 %
17 NS 2P S-1 -50 12 54.55
18 NS 4C W = -420 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a.7 Michel Lievens -Chantal de Lichtervelde 41,99 %
19 NS 2K E-1 100 12 54.55
20 NS 3S S = 600 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.6 Ghislain de Schaetzen -Veronique Herry 48,35 %
21 NS 2P N = 110 19 86.36
22 NS 4S E-1 100 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 60,68 %
a.5 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 52,97 %
23 NS 3T N+1 130 14 63.64
24 NS 4P N-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a.4 Serge Alard -Gerard Cooreman 58,28 %
25 NS 2C E-1 100 0 0.00
26 NS 3T E = -110 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
Total : 237,7 / 528 = 45,02 %
PAIRE A13 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger
a11 Simone Munsterhjelm -Carl Louis Van Brandt 45,02 %
1 NS 3P N-1 -50 13 59.09
2 NS 1S N = 90 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a10 Jean de Villenfagne -Gaetan van de Werve 62,35 %
3 NS 4C W+1 -650 7 31.82
4 NS 1S S-2 -200 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
a.9 Nicole Leclere -Madeleine Gabriel 40,95 %
5 NS 3S E = -400 12 54.55
6 NS 2C S-1 -50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.8 Philippe d'Hoop -Juan del Marmol 40,85 %
7 NS 4T W-2 200 19 86.36
8 NS 4C W+1 -450 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.7 Michel Lievens -Chantal de Lichtervelde 41,99 %
9 NS 4P S-1 -50 2 9.09
10 NS 2P E = -110 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.5 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 52,97 %
11 NS 4CcW-3 500 21 95.45
12 NS 4C S+1 650 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a.4 Serge Alard -Gerard Cooreman 58,28 %
13 NS 3K N-1 -100 2 9.09
14 NS 3S W+1 -430 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
a.3 Luc Rampaer -Bernard Brisbois 48,62 %
15 NS 5P N = 650 14 63.64
16 NS 1S W = -90 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.2 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver 65,28 %
17 NS 1S N-1 -50 12 54.55
18 NS 4C W+1 -450 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a.1 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 50,81 %
19 NS 3K E-2 200 19 86.36
20 NS 3S S+1 630 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a13 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 43,75 %
25 NS 3P S+1 170 5 22.73
26 NS 2T E+1 -110 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a12 Alyona Pascaru -Rita Swinnen 49,62 %
27 NS 4P S-1 -50 0 0.00
28 NS 3S W = -400 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
Total : 234,0 / 528 = 44,32 %
PAIRE A10 Marianne Falla -Patrick Gilles
a.5 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 52,97 %
1 NS 3P N-2 -100 6 27.27
2 NS 2C W-1 50 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.4 Serge Alard -Gerard Cooreman 58,28 %
3 NS 4C W+1 -650 7 31.82
4 NS 3K W+1 -130 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.2 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver 65,28 %
5 NS 3S W = -400 12 54.55
6 NS 3S S-2 -100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a.1 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 50,81 %
7 NS 2P N = 110 5 22.73
8 NS 4C W+1 -450 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a14 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 51,14 %
9 NS 4P S = 420 14 63.64
10 NS 3C N-2 -200 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a13 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 43,75 %
11 NS 3K E-4 200 15 68.18
12 NS 4C S+1 650 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a12 Alyona Pascaru -Rita Swinnen 49,62 %
13 NS 2C S-1 -100 2 9.09
14 NS 3S E-1 50 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a10 Jean de Villenfagne -Gaetan van de Werve 62,35 %
19 NS 2S W-1 100 12 54.55
20 NS 1S S+3 180 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.9 Nicole Leclere -Madeleine Gabriel 40,95 %
21 NS 3C E-1 50 10 45.45
22 NS 6C E-3 300 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
a.8 Philippe d'Hoop -Juan del Marmol 40,85 %
23 NS 3S S-1 -100 5 22.73
24 NS 4P N+1 450 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.7 Michel Lievens -Chantal de Lichtervelde 41,99 %
25 NS 4P S+1 450 22 100.00
26 NS 2T E+1 -110 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.6 Ghislain de Schaetzen -Veronique Herry 48,35 %
27 NS 2P S+3 200 2 9.09
28 NS 3S W = -400 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
Total : 233,8 / 528 = 44,28 %
PAIRE A.8 Lydia Luyten -Prisca Tondreau
a14 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 51,14 %
1 NS 4T W+1 -150 1 4.55
2 NS 1S E-1 50 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
a13 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 43,75 %
3 NS 4C W+1 -650 7 31.82
4 NS 1S S = 90 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a12 Alyona Pascaru -Rita Swinnen 49,62 %
5 NS 3S W = -400 12 54.55
6 NS 4C S-2 -100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a11 Simone Munsterhjelm -Carl Louis Van Brandt 45,02 %
7 NS 1S N+1 120 8 36.36
8 NS 4C W+1 -450 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a10 Jean de Villenfagne -Gaetan van de Werve 62,35 %
9 NS 4P S-1 -50 2 9.09
10 NS 2P E = -110 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.8 Philippe d'Hoop -Juan del Marmol 40,85 %
15 NS 4P N+1 650 14 63.64
16 NS 1S W+3 -180 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a.7 Michel Lievens -Chantal de Lichtervelde 41,99 %
17 NS 1S N-1 -50 12 54.55
18 NS 4C W+1 -450 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a.6 Ghislain de Schaetzen -Veronique Herry 48,35 %
19 NS 2K E = -90 4 18.18
20 NS 3S S+1 630 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.5 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 52,97 %
21 NS 4C W-1 50 10 45.45
22 NS 6C E-2 200 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 55,23 %
a.4 Serge Alard -Gerard Cooreman 58,28 %
23 NS 4C S-1 -100 5 22.73
24 NS 4P N = 420 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.3 Luc Rampaer -Bernard Brisbois 48,62 %
25 NS 3P S+2 200 11 50.00
26 NS 3T E = -110 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.2 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver 65,28 %
27 NS 4P S = 420 12 54.55
28 NS 3S W-1 50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
Total : 224,3 / 528 = 42,48 %
PAIRE A14 Anne de Wasseige -Marguerite Verstraeten
a13 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 43,75 %
1 NS 2P N = 110 22 100.00
2 NS 1S E-1 50 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a12 Alyona Pascaru -Rita Swinnen 49,62 %
3 NS 4C W+1 -650 7 31.82
4 NS 1S S-2 -200 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
a11 Simone Munsterhjelm -Carl Louis Van Brandt 45,02 %
5 NS 3S W = -400 12 54.55
6 NS 1S N+1 120 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a10 Jean de Villenfagne -Gaetan van de Werve 62,35 %
7 NS 2P N = 110 5 22.73
8 NS 4C W+1 -450 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.9 Nicole Leclere -Madeleine Gabriel 40,95 %
9 NS 4P S = 420 14 63.64
10 NS 3C N-2 -200 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.8 Philippe d'Hoop -Juan del Marmol 40,85 %
11 NS 4CcW-3 500 21 95.45
12 NS 4C S = 620 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.6 Ghislain de Schaetzen -Veronique Herry 48,35 %
13 NS 2K N+1 110 15 68.18
14 NS 3S W-2 100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a.5 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 52,97 %
15 NS 4P N+1 650 14 63.64
16 NS 1S W+1 -120 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.4 Serge Alard -Gerard Cooreman 58,28 %
17 NS 2C W+1 -140 1 4.55
18 NS 4C W = -420 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a.3 Luc Rampaer -Bernard Brisbois 48,62 %
19 NS 1S W+1 -120 0 0.00
20 NS 3S S = 600 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
a.2 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver 65,28 %
21 NS 3P N-2 -200 1 4.55
22 NS 4C E = -620 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 7,50 %
a14 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 51,14 %
27 NS 4P S = 420 12 54.55
28 NS 3S W-1 50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
Total : 219,3 / 528 = 41,53 %
PAIRE a.2 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 45,02 %
3 EO 4P W+1 -650 15 68.18
4 EO 1P E+2 -140 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A10 Marianne Falla -Patrick Gilles 44,28 %
5 EO 3S W = -400 10 45.45
6 EO 3S S-2 -100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A.3 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 47,22 %
7 EO 2K E+1 -110 22 100.00
8 EO 4C W+1 -450 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
A11 Annette Fobe -Myriam de Timary 60,66 %
9 EO 4P S-1 -50 20 90.91
10 EO 3P E-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 59,62 %
11 EO 4PcS-3 -500 22 100.00
12 EO 3S S = 600 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 100,00 %
A12 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Wanderpepen 48,11 %
13 EO 1S N = 90 15 68.18
14 EO 3S W+1 -430 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A.5 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin 52,46 %
15 EO 6P N-3 -300 22 100.00
16 EO 3T E-1 100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A13 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 44,32 %
17 EO 1S N-1 -50 10 45.45
18 EO 4C W+1 -450 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A.6 Andre Delacroix -Anne Van den Berge 48,43 %
19 EO 2K E = -90 18 81.82
20 EO 3S S+1 630 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A14 Anne de Wasseige -Marguerite Verstraeten 41,53 %
21 EO 3P N-2 -200 21 95.45
22 EO 4C E = -620 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 92,50 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia 49,11 %
23 EO 4P E-4 400 0 0.00
24 EO 3P N = 140 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.8 Lydia Luyten -Prisca Tondreau 42,48 %
27 EO 4P S = 420 10 45.45
28 EO 3S W-1 50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
Total : 344,7 / 528 = 65,28 %
PAIRE a10 Jean de Villenfagne -Gaetan van de Werve
A.6 Andre Delacroix -Anne Van den Berge 48,43 %
1 EO 3P N-3 -150 21 95.45
2 EO 1S E-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A13 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 44,32 %
3 EO 4C W+1 -650 15 68.18
4 EO 1S S-2 -200 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia 49,11 %
5 EO 3S W+1 -430 21 95.45
6 EO 3S S-2 -100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
A14 Anne de Wasseige -Marguerite Verstraeten 41,53 %
7 EO 2P N = 110 17 77.27
8 EO 4C W+1 -450 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.8 Lydia Luyten -Prisca Tondreau 42,48 %
9 EO 4P S-1 -50 20 90.91
10 EO 2P E = -110 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 61,23 %
11 EO 5T W-2 100 16 72.73
12 EO 4C S+1 650 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 45,02 %
15 EO 5P N = 650 8 36.36
16 EO 1S W+1 -120 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A10 Marianne Falla -Patrick Gilles 44,28 %
19 EO 2S W-1 100 10 45.45
20 EO 1S S+3 180 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 59,62 %
21 EO 4C W-2 100 6 27.27
22 EO 6C E-3 300 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 16,36 %
A11 Annette Fobe -Myriam de Timary 60,66 %
23 EO 3S S-1 -100 17 77.27
24 EO 3S S-1 -50 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
A.5 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin 52,46 %
25 EO 5C E-2 200 11 50.00
26 EO 2T E+1 -110 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A12 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Wanderpepen 48,11 %
27 EO 4P S = 420 10 45.45
28 EO 3S W = -400 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
Total : 329,2 / 528 = 62,35 %
PAIRE a.4 Serge Alard -Gerard Cooreman
A10 Marianne Falla -Patrick Gilles 44,28 %
3 EO 4C W+1 -650 15 68.18
4 EO 3K W+1 -130 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 59,62 %
7 EO 2P N+1 140 10 45.45
8 EO 4C W+1 -450 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A12 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Wanderpepen 48,11 %
9 EO 4P S = 420 8 36.36
10 EO 2P E = -110 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.5 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin 52,46 %
11 EO 4T W-2 100 16 72.73
12 EO 4C S+1 650 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A13 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 44,32 %
13 EO 3K N-1 -100 20 90.91
14 EO 3S W+1 -430 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
A.6 Andre Delacroix -Anne Van den Berge 48,43 %
15 EO 4P N+2 680 0 0.00
16 EO 1S W = -90 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
A14 Anne de Wasseige -Marguerite Verstraeten 41,53 %
17 EO 2C W+1 -140 21 95.45
18 EO 4C W = -420 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia 49,11 %
19 EO 2K E-1 100 10 45.45
20 EO 3S S = 600 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 61,23 %
21 EO 2P N = 110 3 13.64
22 EO 4C E = -620 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 51,59 %
A.8 Lydia Luyten -Prisca Tondreau 42,48 %
23 EO 4C S-1 -100 17 77.27
24 EO 4P N = 420 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 45,02 %
25 EO 2C E-1 100 22 100.00
26 EO 3T E = -110 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.9 Noelle Fosse -Martine Zens 55,55 %
27 EO 4P S = 420 10 45.45
28 EO 3S W+1 -430 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
Total : 307,7 / 528 = 58,28 %
PAIRE a.5 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw
A10 Marianne Falla -Patrick Gilles 44,28 %
1 EO 3P N-2 -100 16 72.73
2 EO 2C W-1 50 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A11 Annette Fobe -Myriam de Timary 60,66 %
5 EO 3S E = -400 10 45.45
6 EO 3S S-2 -100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A.5 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin 52,46 %
9 EO 4P S = 420 8 36.36
10 EO 3C N-3 -300 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A13 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 44,32 %
11 EO 4CcW-3 500 1 4.55
12 EO 4C S+1 650 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A.6 Andre Delacroix -Anne Van den Berge 48,43 %
13 EO 2C S = 110 7 31.82
14 EO 3S W+2 -460 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A14 Anne de Wasseige -Marguerite Verstraeten 41,53 %
15 EO 4P N+1 650 8 36.36
16 EO 1S W+1 -120 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia 49,11 %
17 EO 1S N-1 -50 10 45.45
18 EO 4C W = -420 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 61,23 %
19 EO 2K E = -90 18 81.82
20 EO 3S S+1 630 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.8 Lydia Luyten -Prisca Tondreau 42,48 %
21 EO 4C W-1 50 12 54.55
22 EO 6C E-2 200 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 44,77 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 45,02 %
23 EO 3T N+1 130 8 36.36
24 EO 4P N-2 -100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A.9 Noelle Fosse -Martine Zens 55,55 %
25 EO 4P S = 420 4 18.18
26 EO 3T E = -110 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.3 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 47,22 %
27 EO 4P S = 420 10 45.45
28 EO 3S W-1 50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
Total : 279,7 / 528 = 52,97 %
PAIRE a14 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
A.8 Lydia Luyten -Prisca Tondreau 42,48 %
1 EO 4T W+1 -150 21 95.45
2 EO 1S E-1 50 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 61,23 %
3 EO 4C W+1 -650 15 68.18
4 EO 1S S = 90 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.9 Noelle Fosse -Martine Zens 55,55 %
5 EO 3S E = -400 10 45.45
6 EO 3K N+1 130 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 45,02 %
7 EO 2P N+1 140 10 45.45
8 EO 4C W+1 -450 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A10 Marianne Falla -Patrick Gilles 44,28 %
9 EO 4P S = 420 8 36.36
10 EO 3C N-2 -200 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.3 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 47,22 %
11 EO 5T W-3 150 11 50.00
12 EO 4C S+1 650 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A11 Annette Fobe -Myriam de Timary 60,66 %
13 EO 2T E-1 100 12 54.55
14 EO 3S W-2 100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 59,62 %
15 EO 6P N-1 -100 17 77.27
16 EO 3K N = 110 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A12 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Wanderpepen 48,11 %
17 EO 2C W+1 -140 21 95.45
18 EO 4C W+2 -480 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 97,73 %
A.5 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin 52,46 %
19 EO 2K E-1 100 10 45.45
20 EO 3S S+2 660 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.6 Andre Delacroix -Anne Van den Berge 48,43 %
23 EO 4T N = 130 8 36.36
24 EO 3S N-1 -50 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A14 Anne de Wasseige -Marguerite Verstraeten 41,53 %
27 EO 4P S = 420 10 45.45
28 EO 3S W-1 50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
Total : 270,0 / 528 = 51,14 %
PAIRE a.1 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 61,23 %
1 EO 3P N-1 -50 9 40.91
2 EO 2K S+1 110 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A.9 Noelle Fosse -Martine Zens 55,55 %
3 EO 4C W+1 -650 15 68.18
4 EO 1S S = 90 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 45,02 %
5 EO 3S E = -400 10 45.45
6 EO 3S S-2 -100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A10 Marianne Falla -Patrick Gilles 44,28 %
7 EO 2P N = 110 17 77.27
8 EO 4C W+1 -450 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.3 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 47,22 %
9 EO 4P S = 420 8 36.36
10 EO 3C N-4 -400 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A11 Annette Fobe -Myriam de Timary 60,66 %
11 EO 3T W-1 50 20 90.91
12 EO 4C S+2 680 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 59,62 %
13 EO 1S S+1 120 1 4.55
14 EO 3S E = -400 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A12 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Wanderpepen 48,11 %
15 EO 6P N-1 -100 17 77.27
16 EO 1S W = -90 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.5 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin 52,46 %
17 EO 2C W = -110 17 77.27
18 EO 4C W = -420 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A13 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 44,32 %
19 EO 3K E-2 200 3 13.64
20 EO 3S S+1 630 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A.6 Andre Delacroix -Anne Van den Berge 48,43 %
21 EO 2P N-1 -100 18 81.82
22 EO 4C E-1 100 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 73,41 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia 49,11 %
25 EO 3T W-3 300 8 36.36
26 EO 2T E+1 -110 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
Total : 268,3 / 528 = 50,81 %
PAIRE a12 Alyona Pascaru -Rita Swinnen
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia 49,11 %
1 EO 4C E-2 100 2 9.09
2 EO 2S N = 120 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
A14 Anne de Wasseige -Marguerite Verstraeten 41,53 %
3 EO 4C W+1 -650 15 68.18
4 EO 1S S-2 -200 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
A.8 Lydia Luyten -Prisca Tondreau 42,48 %
5 EO 3S W = -400 10 45.45
6 EO 4C S-2 -100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 61,23 %
7 EO 3K E-3 300 0 0.00
8 EO 4C W-1 50 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 4,55 %
A.9 Noelle Fosse -Martine Zens 55,55 %
9 EO 4P S = 420 8 36.36
10 EO 3C N-3 -300 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 45,02 %
11 EO 2PcS = 470 4 18.18
12 EO 4C S+2 680 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
A10 Marianne Falla -Patrick Gilles 44,28 %
13 EO 2C S-1 -100 20 90.91
14 EO 3S E-1 50 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A.3 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 47,22 %
15 EO 6P N-2 -200 20 90.91
16 EO 1S W = -90 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 59,62 %
19 EO 3C W-3 300 0 0.00
20 EO 3S S+1 630 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
A12 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Wanderpepen 48,11 %
23 EO 3T N+1 130 8 36.36
24 EO 3S S = 400 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.6 Andre Delacroix -Anne Van den Berge 48,43 %
25 EO 2P S+2 170 17 77.27
26 EO 2T E+2 -130 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
A13 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 44,32 %
27 EO 4P S-1 -50 22 100.00
28 EO 3S W = -400 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
Total : 262,0 / 528 = 49,62 %
PAIRE a.3 Luc Rampaer -Bernard Brisbois
A.9 Noelle Fosse -Martine Zens 55,55 %
1 EO 4K W-1 50 4 18.18
2 EO 1S E-1 50 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.3 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 47,22 %
5 EO 3S W+1 -430 21 95.45
6 EO 1S S+3 180 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A11 Annette Fobe -Myriam de Timary 60,66 %
7 EO 2C W-2 200 3 13.64
8 EO 4C W-1 50 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 59,62 %
9 EO 4P S = 420 8 36.36
10 EO 3T S-2 -200 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A12 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Wanderpepen 48,11 %
11 EO 4T W-2 100 16 72.73
12 EO 4C S+2 680 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.5 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin 52,46 %
13 EO 2C S-1 -100 20 90.91
14 EO 3S W-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A13 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 44,32 %
15 EO 5P N = 650 8 36.36
16 EO 1S W = -90 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.6 Andre Delacroix -Anne Van den Berge 48,43 %
17 EO 2C W = -110 17 77.27
18 EO 5C W-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A14 Anne de Wasseige -Marguerite Verstraeten 41,53 %
19 EO 1S W+1 -120 22 100.00
20 EO 3S S = 600 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia 49,11 %
21 EO 2P N-2 -200 21 95.45
22 EO 3S E-2 200 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 65,23 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 61,23 %
23 EO 5T N-1 -100 17 77.27
24 EO 4P N = 420 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.8 Lydia Luyten -Prisca Tondreau 42,48 %
25 EO 3P S+2 200 11 50.00
26 EO 3T E = -110 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
Total : 256,7 / 528 = 48,62 %
PAIRE a.6 Ghislain de Schaetzen -Veronique Herry
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 59,62 %
1 EO 4P N-2 -100 16 72.73
2 EO 1S E-1 50 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A11 Annette Fobe -Myriam de Timary 60,66 %
3 EO 3S E = -600 0 0.00
4 EO 1P E+2 -140 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A12 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Wanderpepen 48,11 %
7 EO 2P N+2 170 6 27.27
8 EO 4C W = -420 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A.6 Andre Delacroix -Anne Van den Berge 48,43 %
11 EO 4T E-3 150 11 50.00
12 EO 4C S+1 650 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A14 Anne de Wasseige -Marguerite Verstraeten 41,53 %
13 EO 2K N+1 110 7 31.82
14 EO 3S W-2 100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia 49,11 %
15 EO 5P N = 650 8 36.36
16 EO 1S W+1 -120 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 61,23 %
17 EO 1S N+1 120 0 0.00
18 EO 4C W = -420 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
A.8 Lydia Luyten -Prisca Tondreau 42,48 %
19 EO 2K E = -90 18 81.82
20 EO 3S S+1 630 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 45,02 %
21 EO 2P N = 110 3 13.64
22 EO 4S E-1 100 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 39,32 %
A.9 Noelle Fosse -Martine Zens 55,55 %
23 EO 3T N+1 130 8 36.36
24 EO 3S S = 400 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.3 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 47,22 %
25 EO 4P S = 420 4 18.18
26 EO 2S E+1 -150 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A10 Marianne Falla -Patrick Gilles 44,28 %
27 EO 2P S+3 200 20 90.91
28 EO 3S W = -400 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
Total : 255,3 / 528 = 48,35 %
PAIRE a11 Simone Munsterhjelm -Carl Louis Van Brandt
A13 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 44,32 %
1 EO 3P N-1 -50 9 40.91
2 EO 1S N = 90 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia 49,11 %
3 EO 4C W = -620 4 18.18
4 EO 1P E+2 -140 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A14 Anne de Wasseige -Marguerite Verstraeten 41,53 %
5 EO 3S W = -400 10 45.45
6 EO 1S N+1 120 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.8 Lydia Luyten -Prisca Tondreau 42,48 %
7 EO 1S N+1 120 14 63.64
8 EO 4C W+1 -450 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 61,23 %
9 EO 4P S = 420 8 36.36
10 EO 3C N-1 -100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.9 Noelle Fosse -Martine Zens 55,55 %
11 EO 4T W-4 200 7 31.82
12 EO 4C S+1 650 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 45,02 %
13 EO 1S N = 90 15 68.18
14 EO 5T E-1 50 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.3 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 47,22 %
17 EO 1S N = 90 3 13.64
18 EO 4C W = -420 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A11 Annette Fobe -Myriam de Timary 60,66 %
21 EO 4C W-3 150 0 0.00
22 EO 6C E-2 200 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 17,50 %
A.5 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin 52,46 %
23 EO 5T N-2 -200 22 100.00
24 EO 3S S+1 430 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A12 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Wanderpepen 48,11 %
25 EO 3P S+1 170 17 77.27
26 EO 3T E = -110 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A.6 Andre Delacroix -Anne Van den Berge 48,43 %
27 EO 4P S = 420 10 45.45
28 EO 3S W = -400 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
Total : 237,7 / 528 = 45,02 %
PAIRE a13 Edith Close -Jan Sassen
A14 Anne de Wasseige -Marguerite Verstraeten 41,53 %
1 EO 2P N = 110 0 0.00
2 EO 1S E-1 50 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.8 Lydia Luyten -Prisca Tondreau 42,48 %
3 EO 4C W+1 -650 15 68.18
4 EO 1S S = 90 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 61,23 %
5 EO 3S W-1 50 0 0.00
6 EO 3S S-2 -100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.9 Noelle Fosse -Martine Zens 55,55 %
7 EO 2P N+1 140 10 45.45
8 EO 4C W-1 50 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 45,02 %
9 EO 4P S = 420 8 36.36
10 EO 3C N-3 -300 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A10 Marianne Falla -Patrick Gilles 44,28 %
11 EO 3K E-4 200 7 31.82
12 EO 4C S+1 650 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A.3 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 47,22 %
13 EO 2K N+1 110 7 31.82
14 EO 3S W+1 -430 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A11 Annette Fobe -Myriam de Timary 60,66 %
15 EO 4C N+1 650 8 36.36
16 EO 2P N = 110 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 59,62 %
17 EO 1S N = 90 3 13.64
18 EO 4C W = -420 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A.5 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin 52,46 %
21 EO 3C E-1 50 12 54.55
22 EO 50%50% Ajust 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A13 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 44,32 %
25 EO 3P S+1 170 17 77.27
26 EO 2T E+1 -110 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia 49,11 %
27 EO 4P S = 420 10 45.45
28 EO 3S W = -400 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
Total : 231,0 / 528 = 43,75 %
PAIRE a.7 Michel Lievens -Chantal de Lichtervelde
A11 Annette Fobe -Myriam de Timary 60,66 %
1 EO 3P N-1 -50 9 40.91
2 EO 1S E-2 100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.5 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin 52,46 %
3 EO 4C W = -620 4 18.18
4 EO 1P E+2 -140 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A12 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Wanderpepen 48,11 %
5 EO 3S E = -400 10 45.45
6 EO 3S N+1 430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A13 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 44,32 %
9 EO 4P S-1 -50 20 90.91
10 EO 2P E = -110 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia 49,11 %
13 EO 2K N+1 110 7 31.82
14 EO 3S W-2 100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 61,23 %
15 EO 4P N+1 650 8 36.36
16 EO 2T W+1 -110 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.8 Lydia Luyten -Prisca Tondreau 42,48 %
17 EO 1S N-1 -50 10 45.45
18 EO 4C W+1 -450 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 45,02 %
19 EO 2K E-1 100 10 45.45
20 EO 3S S = 600 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.9 Noelle Fosse -Martine Zens 55,55 %
21 EO 3C E-1 50 12 54.55
22 EO 6C E-2 200 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 44,77 %
A.3 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 47,22 %
23 EO 3P E-3 300 2 9.09
24 EO 3S S = 400 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A10 Marianne Falla -Patrick Gilles 44,28 %
25 EO 4P S+1 450 0 0.00
26 EO 2T E+1 -110 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 59,62 %
27 EO 4P S = 420 10 45.45
28 EO 3S W-1 50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
Total : 221,7 / 528 = 41,99 %
PAIRE a.9 Nicole Leclere -Madeleine Gabriel
A12 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Wanderpepen 48,11 %
1 EO 4P N-2 -100 16 72.73
2 EO 1S E-2 100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.6 Andre Delacroix -Anne Van den Berge 48,43 %
3 EO 4C W = -620 4 18.18
4 EO 2K W+1 -110 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A13 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 44,32 %
5 EO 3S E = -400 10 45.45
6 EO 2C S-1 -50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia 49,11 %
7 EO 3P N-1 -100 20 90.91
8 EO 4C W+1 -450 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
A14 Anne de Wasseige -Marguerite Verstraeten 41,53 %
9 EO 4P S = 420 8 36.36
10 EO 3C N-2 -200 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 61,23 %
13 EO 1S N+1 120 1 4.55
14 EO 3S E = -400 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.9 Noelle Fosse -Martine Zens 55,55 %
17 EO 1S N-1 -50 10 45.45
18 EO 4C W = -420 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A.3 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 47,22 %
19 EO 2K E-2 200 3 13.64
20 EO 3S S+1 630 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A10 Marianne Falla -Patrick Gilles 44,28 %
21 EO 3C E-1 50 12 54.55
22 EO 6C E-3 300 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 59,62 %
23 EO 4T N = 130 8 36.36
24 EO 3S S+1 430 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A11 Annette Fobe -Myriam de Timary 60,66 %
25 EO 3P S+1 170 17 77.27
26 EO 3T E = -110 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A.5 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin 52,46 %
27 EO 4P S = 420 10 45.45
28 EO 3S W-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
Total : 216,2 / 528 = 40,95 %
PAIRE a.8 Philippe d'Hoop -Juan del Marmol
A.5 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin 52,46 %
1 EO 3P N-1 -50 9 40.91
2 EO 1S E-2 100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A12 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Wanderpepen 48,11 %
3 EO 4C W+1 -650 15 68.18
4 EO 1S S-1 -100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.6 Andre Delacroix -Anne Van den Berge 48,43 %
5 EO 3S W = -400 10 45.45
6 EO 1S N+3 180 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A13 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 44,32 %
7 EO 4T W-2 200 3 13.64
8 EO 4C W+1 -450 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A14 Anne de Wasseige -Marguerite Verstraeten 41,53 %
11 EO 4CcW-3 500 1 4.55
12 EO 4C S = 620 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.8 Lydia Luyten -Prisca Tondreau 42,48 %
15 EO 4P N+1 650 8 36.36
16 EO 1S W+3 -180 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 45,02 %
17 EO 2P S-1 -50 10 45.45
18 EO 4C W = -420 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A.9 Noelle Fosse -Martine Zens 55,55 %
19 EO 2K E-1 100 10 45.45
20 EO 3S S+1 630 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.3 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 47,22 %
21 EO 3C E-1 50 12 54.55
22 EO 4C E = -620 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 72,05 %
A10 Marianne Falla -Patrick Gilles 44,28 %
23 EO 3S S-1 -100 17 77.27
24 EO 4P N+1 450 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 59,62 %
25 EO 4P S = 420 4 18.18
26 EO 4T E-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
A11 Annette Fobe -Myriam de Timary 60,66 %
27 EO 4P S+1 450 0 0.00
28 EO 3S W-1 50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
Total : 215,7 / 528 = 40,85 %
|