B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 69,48 A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier
--- 2 62,13 A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia
--- 3 55,19 A.8 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Jeannine Wanderpepen
--- 4 53,17 B.3 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy
--- 5 52,22 B.5 Patrick Gilles -Jean Marie Schmiliver
--- 6 51,22 B.9 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin
--- 7 51,14 B.6 Annie Zeimes -Madeleine Gabriel
--- 8 50,79 A.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Colette Heerinckx
--- 9 50,78 B10 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren
--- 10 49,37 A.4 Annette Fobe -Myriam de Timary
--- 11 48,50 B.7 Nicole Blondeau -Annie Legrand
--- 12 48,28 B.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten
--- 13 47,40 A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens
--- 14 46,48 A.9 Claire Derieuw -Claire de Quirini
--- 15 46,35 A10 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger
--- 16 45,51 B.1 Benoit del Marmol -Pascale Ortegat
--- 17 44,81 A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Caroll Pucher
--- 18 44,26 B.8 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson
--- 19 43,08 A.6 Andre Delacroix -Muriel de Ceuninck
--- 20 40,75 B.2 Sophie Noach -Marie Claire Vienne
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 58,85 b.2 Diane della Faille -Elie Behaghel
--- 2 57,46 a.5 Michel Lievens -Helene Christiaens
--- 3 56,82 b.5 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels
--- 4 56,64 a.4 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys
--- 5 56,06 a10 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve
--- 6 54,68 b10 Miguel del Marmol -Gaetan Collinet
--- 7 52,53 b.4 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw
--- 8 51,86 b.7 Serge Alard -Stan Tabor
--- 9 50,76 a.3 Jeanine Bontemps -Aida Zumot
--- 10 50,53 b.1 Martine Zens -Noelle Fosse
--- 11 49,13 b.3 Marie Neve -Prisca Tondreau
--- 12 48,71 a.6 Bruno Quievy -Didier Collart
--- 13 47,63 b.8 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse
--- 14 47,00 b.6 Simone Munsterhjelm -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
--- 15 45,57 b.9 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire
--- 16 45,31 a.9 Edith Close -Jan Sassen
--- 17 45,24 a.2 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman
--- 18 43,43 a.7 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne
--- 19 32,03 a.1 Jacques Podevyn -Francine Belet
--- 20 0,00 a.8 -
PAIRE A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman 45,24 %
4 NS 4C W = -620 21.4 71.33
5 NS 2C E-1 50 7.5 25.00
6 NS 1S W-2 200 27.8 92.67 µ Tbl = 63,00 %
a.1 Jacques Podevyn -Francine Belet 32,03 %
7 NS 1S S+2 150 21.4 71.33
8 NS 3K E+1 -130 27.8 92.67
9 NS 4C N+2 480 28.9 96.33 µ Tbl = 86,78 %
a10 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 56,06 %
10 NS 1P S+3 170 21.4 71.33
11 NS 4C E+1 -450 19.3 64.33
12 NS 3S S = 600 20.3 67.67 µ Tbl = 67,78 %
a.9 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 45,31 %
13 NS 4C E = -620 20 66.67
14 NS 1S S = 90 24 80.00
15 NS 1P W = -80 28 93.33 µ Tbl = 80,00 %
a.8 - 0,00 %
16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.6 Bruno Quievy -Didier Collart 48,71 %
19 NS 3P E-1 100 14 46.67
20 NS 4C N = 620 16 53.33
21 NS 1S E-2 100 22 73.33 µ Tbl = 57,78 %
a.5 Michel Lievens -Helene Christiaens 57,46 %
22 NS 6K S = 920 25.7 85.67
23 NS 1S E = -90 16.1 53.67
24 NS 4P N+2 480 16.1 53.67 µ Tbl = 64,33 %
a.4 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 56,64 %
25 NS 4P W+2 -680 12.9 43.00
26 NS 2P E = -110 18.2 60.67
27 NS 2P N+1 140 28.9 96.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 437,7 / 630 = 69,48 %
PAIRE A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia
a.3 Jeanine Bontemps -Aida Zumot 50,76 %
1 NS 1S N+2 150 26.7 89.00
2 NS 4C W-2 100 25.7 85.67
3 NS 3S S+1 430 25.2 84.00 µ Tbl = 86,22 %
a.1 Jacques Podevyn -Francine Belet 32,03 %
4 NS 4C W+2 -680 4.3 14.33
5 NS 1S N = 90 19.3 64.33
6 NS 1PcE-2 500 29.9 99.67 µ Tbl = 59,44 %
a10 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 56,06 %
7 NS 3P N-2 -200 0.1 0.33
8 NS 4C E+1 -450 13.9 46.33
9 NS 4C N+2 480 28.9 96.33 µ Tbl = 47,67 %
a.9 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 45,31 %
10 NS 2P S+1 140 13.9 46.33
11 NS 4C E+1 -450 19.3 64.33
12 NS 3S S = 600 20.3 67.67 µ Tbl = 59,44 %
a.7 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 43,43 %
19 NS 4P E-3 300 28 93.33
20 NS 4C N = 620 16 53.33
21 NS 1S E-4 200 29 96.67 µ Tbl = 81,11 %
a.6 Bruno Quievy -Didier Collart 48,71 %
22 NS 5K S+1 420 15 50.00
23 NS 2S W-1 100 24.6 82.00
24 NS 4P N+2 480 16.1 53.67 µ Tbl = 61,89 %
a.5 Michel Lievens -Helene Christiaens 57,46 %
25 NS 6P W = -1430 1.1 3.67
26 NS 2P E+1 -140 9.7 32.33
27 NS 2P N = 110 25.7 85.67 µ Tbl = 40,56 %
a.4 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 56,64 %
28 NS 4C W = -420 24.6 82.00
29 NS 4P S+1 650 21.4 71.33
30 NS 2C N-1 -50 8.6 28.67 µ Tbl = 60,67 %
Total : 447,3 / 720 = 62,13 %
PAIRE A.8 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Jeannine Wanderpepen
a.5 Michel Lievens -Helene Christiaens 57,46 %
1 NS 1S N = 90 9.7 32.33
2 NS 1S E+1 -120 8.6 28.67
3 NS 2P N+1 140 8.2 27.33 µ Tbl = 29,44 %
a.4 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 56,64 %
4 NS 4C W = -620 21.4 71.33
5 NS 1S N+1 120 29.9 99.67
6 NS 2C S-2 -100 4.3 14.33 µ Tbl = 61,78 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman 45,24 %
7 NS 2C E-1 100 15 50.00
8 NS 4C E+1 -450 13.9 46.33
9 NS 4C N+1 450 19.3 64.33 µ Tbl = 53,56 %
a.1 Jacques Podevyn -Francine Belet 32,03 %
10 NS 4P S-1 -100 3.3 11.00
11 NS 4C E-3 150 29.9 99.67
12 NS 3S N+1 630 28.9 96.33 µ Tbl = 69,00 %
a10 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 56,06 %
13 NS 4C E = -620 20 66.67
14 NS 2S W-1 50 14 46.67
15 NS 1S W+1 -120 11 36.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.8 - 0,00 %
22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.7 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 43,43 %
25 NS 6P W-1 100 27.8 92.67
26 NS 2P E+1 -140 9.7 32.33
27 NS 3P N-1 -50 15 50.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
a.6 Bruno Quievy -Didier Collart 48,71 %
28 NS 1TcE+2 -340 27.8 92.67
29 NS 5P S = 650 21.4 71.33
30 NS 2C N-1 -50 8.6 28.67 µ Tbl = 64,22 %
Total : 347,7 / 630 = 55,19 %
PAIRE B.3 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy
b.3 Marie Neve -Prisca Tondreau 49,13 %
7 NS 3C E-2 200 26.7 89.00
8 NS 4C E+1 -450 13.9 46.33
9 NS 3S S = 400 10.7 35.67 µ Tbl = 57,00 %
b.2 Diane della Faille -Elie Behaghel 58,85 %
10 NS 2P S+1 140 13.9 46.33
11 NS 4C E+1 -450 19.3 64.33
12 NS 3S S = 600 20.3 67.67 µ Tbl = 59,44 %
b.1 Martine Zens -Noelle Fosse 50,53 %
13 NS 4C E = -620 20 66.67
14 NS 1S S-1 -50 9 30.00
15 NS 1S W = -90 24 80.00 µ Tbl = 58,89 %
b10 Miguel del Marmol -Gaetan Collinet 54,68 %
16 NS 4P S+1 450 22.5 75.00
17 NS 3S S = 400 16.1 53.67
18 NS 4P E = -420 12.9 43.00 µ Tbl = 57,22 %
b.9 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 45,57 %
19 NS 3K W+1 -130 4 13.33
20 NS 4C N = 620 16 53.33
21 NS 1S E-1 50 12 40.00 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
b.7 Serge Alard -Stan Tabor 51,86 %
22 NS 5K S+1 420 15 50.00
23 NS 1S E = -90 16.1 53.67
24 NS 3CcW-5 1100 29.9 99.67 µ Tbl = 67,78 %
b.6 Simone Munsterhjelm -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 47,00 %
25 NS 4P W+2 -680 12.9 43.00
26 NS 2P E = -110 18.2 60.67
27 NS 1S W+2 -150 3.3 11.00 µ Tbl = 38,22 %
b.5 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 56,82 %
28 NS 3S E+1 -430 19.3 64.33
29 NS 4P S = 620 7.5 25.00
30 NS 1S W-2 100 19.3 64.33 µ Tbl = 51,22 %
Total : 382,8 / 720 = 53,17 %
PAIRE B.5 Patrick Gilles -Jean Marie Schmiliver
b.8 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 47,63 %
1 NS 1S N-1 -50 0.1 0.33
2 NS 3C W-1 50 20.3 67.67
3 NS 4P N+1 450 29.8 99.33 µ Tbl = 55,78 %
b.7 Serge Alard -Stan Tabor 51,86 %
4 NS 4C W = -620 21.4 71.33
5 NS 2C E-1 50 7.5 25.00
6 NS 2C S-2 -100 4.3 14.33 µ Tbl = 36,89 %
b.5 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 56,82 %
13 NS 4C E = -620 20 66.67
14 NS 2K W-1 50 14 46.67
15 NS 1S W = -90 24 80.00 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
b.4 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 52,53 %
16 NS 4P S-1 -50 3.3 11.00
17 NS 3S S = 400 16.1 53.67
18 NS 4P E = -420 12.9 43.00 µ Tbl = 35,89 %
b.3 Marie Neve -Prisca Tondreau 49,13 %
19 NS 3T W+1 -130 4 13.33
20 NS 4C N = 620 16 53.33
21 NS 3C S+1 170 26 86.67 µ Tbl = 51,11 %
b.2 Diane della Faille -Elie Behaghel 58,85 %
22 NS 6K S = 940 29.9 99.67
23 NS 2S W = -120 4.3 14.33
24 NS 3S S+2 460 4.3 14.33 µ Tbl = 42,78 %
b.1 Martine Zens -Noelle Fosse 50,53 %
25 NS 4P W+1 -650 22.5 75.00
26 NS 1S W+2 -150 6.5 21.67
27 NS 2P N-1 -50 15 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,89 %
b.9 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 45,57 %
28 NS 4C W = -420 24.6 82.00
29 NS 4P S+1 650 21.4 71.33
30 NS 1S W-4 200 27.8 92.67 µ Tbl = 82,00 %
Total : 376,0 / 720 = 52,22 %
PAIRE B.9 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin
b.7 Serge Alard -Stan Tabor 51,86 %
1 NS 1S N+2 150 26.7 89.00
2 NS 2C W = -110 15 50.00
3 NS 4P N = 420 17.2 57.33 µ Tbl = 65,44 %
b.6 Simone Munsterhjelm -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 47,00 %
4 NS 3P N-2 -200 29.9 99.67
5 NS 1S N = 90 19.3 64.33
6 NS 2C S-1 -50 13.9 46.33 µ Tbl = 70,11 %
b.5 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 56,82 %
7 NS 2C E = -110 3.3 11.00
8 NS 4C E+1 -450 13.9 46.33
9 NS 4P N-3 -150 0.1 0.33 µ Tbl = 19,22 %
b.3 Marie Neve -Prisca Tondreau 49,13 %
10 NS 4P S-1 -100 3.3 11.00
11 NS 4C E+3 -510 5.4 18.00
12 NS 3S S = 600 20.3 67.67 µ Tbl = 32,22 %
b.2 Diane della Faille -Elie Behaghel 58,85 %
13 NS 4C E+1 -650 7 23.33
14 NS 1S S = 90 24 80.00
15 NS 1S W+1 -120 11 36.67 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
b.1 Martine Zens -Noelle Fosse 50,53 %
16 NS 4P S+1 450 22.5 75.00
17 NS 3S S-1 -50 3.3 11.00
18 NS 4P E-1 50 26.7 89.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
b.9 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 45,57 %
25 NS 4P W+2 -680 12.9 43.00
26 NS 1S W+1 -120 12.9 43.00
27 NS 3C W-1 50 23.5 78.33 µ Tbl = 54,78 %
b.8 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 47,63 %
28 NS 3S E+1 -430 19.3 64.33
29 NS 4P S = 620 7.5 25.00
30 NS 2CcN+1 570 29.9 99.67 µ Tbl = 63,00 %
Total : 368,8 / 720 = 51,22 %
PAIRE B.6 Annie Zeimes -Madeleine Gabriel
b10 Miguel del Marmol -Gaetan Collinet 54,68 %
1 NS 2C W-1 50 3.3 11.00
2 NS 2C W+1 -140 3.3 11.00
3 NS 4P S-1 -50 2.4 8.00 µ Tbl = 10,00 %
b.9 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 45,57 %
4 NS 4C W = -620 21.4 71.33
5 NS 3C E-2 100 27.8 92.67
6 NS Pass Passe 19.3 64.33 µ Tbl = 76,11 %
b.8 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 47,63 %
7 NS 3C E-1 100 15 50.00
8 NS 3S E-3 150 29.9 99.67
9 NS 6C N-1 -50 5.4 18.00 µ Tbl = 55,89 %
b.6 Simone Munsterhjelm -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 47,00 %
16 NS 4P S+1 450 22.5 75.00
17 NS 3S S+2 460 29.9 99.67
18 NS 4P E-1 50 26.7 89.00 µ Tbl = 87,89 %
b.5 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 56,82 %
19 NS 3S E-3 300 28 93.33
20 NS 4C N = 620 16 53.33
21 NS 1S E-1 50 12 40.00 µ Tbl = 62,22 %
b.4 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 52,53 %
22 NS 3S S-2 -100 3.3 11.00
23 NS 1S E = -90 16.1 53.67
24 NS 4P N+2 480 16.1 53.67 µ Tbl = 39,44 %
b.3 Marie Neve -Prisca Tondreau 49,13 %
25 NS 4P W+1 -650 22.5 75.00
26 NS 2T W+1 -110 18.2 60.67
27 NS 3S S-5 -250 0.1 0.33 µ Tbl = 45,33 %
b.2 Diane della Faille -Elie Behaghel 58,85 %
28 NS 3S E+2 -460 4.3 14.33
29 NS 2P S+3 200 2.2 7.33
30 NS 2C N = 110 22.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 32,22 %
Total : 368,2 / 720 = 51,14 %
PAIRE A.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Colette Heerinckx
a.8 - 0,00 %
1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.7 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 43,43 %
4 NS 4C W = -620 21.4 71.33
5 NS 2C E-1 50 7.5 25.00
6 NS 2S N-1 -50 13.9 46.33 µ Tbl = 47,56 %
a.5 Michel Lievens -Helene Christiaens 57,46 %
13 NS 4C E+2 -680 1 3.33
14 NS 2C W-1 50 14 46.67
15 NS 1S W-1 50 30 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.4 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 56,64 %
16 NS 3S N = 400 9.7 32.33
17 NS 3S S-1 -50 3.3 11.00
18 NS 4P E = -420 12.9 43.00 µ Tbl = 28,78 %
a.3 Jeanine Bontemps -Aida Zumot 50,76 %
19 NS 4P E-2 200 22 73.33
20 NS 4C N = 620 16 53.33
21 NS 1S E-1 50 12 40.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman 45,24 %
22 NS 6K S = 920 25.7 85.67
23 NS 2C E = -110 8.6 28.67
24 NS 4P S+1 450 2.2 7.33 µ Tbl = 40,56 %
a.1 Jacques Podevyn -Francine Belet 32,03 %
25 NS 6S E-3 300 29.9 99.67
26 NS 1S W = -90 23.5 78.33
27 NS 2P N+1 140 28.9 96.33 µ Tbl = 91,44 %
a.9 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 45,31 %
28 NS 3S E+2 -460 4.3 14.33
29 NS 4P S = 620 7.5 25.00
30 NS 2C N+1 140 25.7 85.67 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
Total : 320,0 / 630 = 50,79 %
PAIRE B10 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren
b.9 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 45,57 %
1 NS 1S N = 90 9.7 32.33
2 NS 4C W-2 100 25.7 85.67
3 NS 2P N+1 140 8.2 27.33 µ Tbl = 48,44 %
b.8 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 47,63 %
4 NS 4C W+1 -650 11.8 39.33
5 NS 1S N = 90 19.3 64.33
6 NS 1S W = -90 8.6 28.67 µ Tbl = 44,11 %
b.7 Serge Alard -Stan Tabor 51,86 %
7 NS 3C E-2 200 26.7 89.00
8 NS 5C E = -450 13.9 46.33
9 NS 4C N+1 450 19.3 64.33 µ Tbl = 66,56 %
b.6 Simone Munsterhjelm -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 47,00 %
10 NS 1P S+4 200 24.6 82.00
11 NS 4C E+1 -450 19.3 64.33
12 NS 3S S-1 -100 8.6 28.67 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
b.4 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 52,53 %
13 NS 4C E+1 -650 7 23.33
14 NS 1S S = 90 24 80.00
15 NS 1S W+1 -120 11 36.67 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
b.3 Marie Neve -Prisca Tondreau 49,13 %
16 NS 4P S-1 -50 3.3 11.00
17 NS 3S S = 400 16.1 53.67
18 NS 3S E = -400 20.3 67.67 µ Tbl = 44,11 %
b.2 Diane della Faille -Elie Behaghel 58,85 %
19 NS 4P W-2 200 22 73.33
20 NS 4C S = 620 16 53.33
21 NS 1S E = -90 2 6.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
b10 Miguel del Marmol -Gaetan Collinet 54,68 %
28 NS 3S E+2 -460 4.3 14.33
29 NS 5P S = 650 21.4 71.33
30 NS 2C N = 110 22.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 53,56 %
Total : 365,6 / 720 = 50,78 %
PAIRE A.4 Annette Fobe -Myriam de Timary
a.6 Bruno Quievy -Didier Collart 48,71 %
1 NS 1S N+2 150 26.7 89.00
2 NS 3S E-1 50 20.3 67.67
3 NS 4P N-1 -50 2.4 8.00 µ Tbl = 54,89 %
a.4 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 56,64 %
10 NS 4P S-1 -100 3.3 11.00
11 NS 4C E+3 -510 5.4 18.00
12 NS 3S N-2 -200 2.2 7.33 µ Tbl = 12,11 %
a.3 Jeanine Bontemps -Aida Zumot 50,76 %
13 NS 4C E+1 -650 7 23.33
14 NS 2C W = -110 4 13.33
15 NS 1S W+1 -120 11 36.67 µ Tbl = 24,44 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman 45,24 %
16 NS 4P S+1 450 22.5 75.00
17 NS 3S S+1 430 26.7 89.00
18 NS 3S E-1 50 26.7 89.00 µ Tbl = 84,33 %
a.1 Jacques Podevyn -Francine Belet 32,03 %
19 NS 4P E-2 200 22 73.33
20 NS 4C N = 620 16 53.33
21 NS 1S E-4 200 29 96.67 µ Tbl = 74,44 %
a10 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 56,06 %
22 NS 5K S+1 420 15 50.00
23 NS 1S E+1 -120 4.3 14.33
24 NS 4P N+2 480 16.1 53.67 µ Tbl = 39,33 %
a.8 - 0,00 %
25 NS BYE 0 0.00
26 NS BYE 0 0.00
27 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.7 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 43,43 %
28 NS 5C W = -450 12.9 43.00
29 NS 4P S+1 650 21.4 71.33
30 NS 2P E-1 50 16.1 53.67 µ Tbl = 56,00 %
Total : 311,0 / 630 = 49,37 %
PAIRE B.7 Nicole Blondeau -Annie Legrand
b.3 Marie Neve -Prisca Tondreau 49,13 %
1 NS 1S N+2 150 26.7 89.00
2 NS 2S E = -120 8.6 28.67
3 NS 3S S+1 430 25.2 84.00 µ Tbl = 67,22 %
b.1 Martine Zens -Noelle Fosse 50,53 %
4 NS 4C W+1 -650 11.8 39.33
5 NS 1S N = 90 19.3 64.33
6 NS 1S W+1 -120 0.1 0.33 µ Tbl = 34,67 %
b10 Miguel del Marmol -Gaetan Collinet 54,68 %
7 NS 3C E-2 200 26.7 89.00
8 NS 4C E+2 -480 3.3 11.00
9 NS 6C N-1 -50 5.4 18.00 µ Tbl = 39,33 %
b.9 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 45,57 %
10 NS 2P S+1 140 13.9 46.33
11 NS 4C E+1 -450 19.3 64.33
12 NS 4P S-2 -200 2.2 7.33 µ Tbl = 39,33 %
b.7 Serge Alard -Stan Tabor 51,86 %
19 NS 5K W-1 100 14 46.67
20 NS 4C N = 620 16 53.33
21 NS 1S E-1 50 12 40.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
b.6 Simone Munsterhjelm -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 47,00 %
22 NS 5K S+1 420 15 50.00
23 NS 2C E-2 200 28.9 96.33
24 NS 6P N = 980 27.8 92.67 µ Tbl = 79,67 %
b.5 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 56,82 %
25 NS 5P W+1 -680 12.9 43.00
26 NS 3S E = -600 2.2 7.33
27 NS 2P N-1 -50 15 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,44 %
b.4 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 52,53 %
28 NS 4C W+1 -450 12.9 43.00
29 NS 5P S = 650 21.4 71.33
30 NS 2C N-1 -50 8.6 28.67 µ Tbl = 47,67 %
Total : 349,2 / 720 = 48,50 %
PAIRE B.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten
b.6 Simone Munsterhjelm -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 47,00 %
1 NS 1S N+1 120 19.3 64.33
2 NS 2C W+1 -140 3.3 11.00
3 NS 50%60% Ajust 15 50.00 µ Tbl = 41,78 %
b.4 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 52,53 %
10 NS 2P S+1 140 13.9 46.33
11 NS 4C E+1 -450 19.3 64.33
12 NS 2S S+1 150 12.9 43.00 µ Tbl = 51,22 %
b.3 Marie Neve -Prisca Tondreau 49,13 %
13 NS 4C E = -620 20 66.67
14 NS 1S S = 90 24 80.00
15 NS 1S W+1 -120 11 36.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
b.2 Diane della Faille -Elie Behaghel 58,85 %
16 NS 4P S+1 450 22.5 75.00
17 NS 3S S+1 430 26.7 89.00
18 NS 4P E+1 -450 1.1 3.67 µ Tbl = 55,89 %
b.1 Martine Zens -Noelle Fosse 50,53 %
19 NS 3K W+1 -130 4 13.33
20 NS 4C N = 620 16 53.33
21 NS 1S E-1 50 12 40.00 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
b10 Miguel del Marmol -Gaetan Collinet 54,68 %
22 NS 5K S+1 420 15 50.00
23 NS 1S E = -90 16.1 53.67
24 NS 4P N+2 480 16.1 53.67 µ Tbl = 52,44 %
b.8 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 47,63 %
25 NS 4P W+2 -680 12.9 43.00
26 NS 2P E-1 100 25.7 85.67
27 NS 2P N-1 -50 15 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,56 %
b.7 Serge Alard -Stan Tabor 51,86 %
28 NS 3S E+2 -460 4.3 14.33
29 NS 4P S+1 650 21.4 71.33
30 NS 3CcN-2 -300 0.1 0.33 µ Tbl = 28,67 %
Total : 347,6 / 720 = 48,28 %
PAIRE A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens
a.3 Jeanine Bontemps -Aida Zumot 50,76 %
7 NS 2C W = -110 3.3 11.00
8 NS 4C E = -420 23.5 78.33
9 NS 4C N+1 450 19.3 64.33 µ Tbl = 51,22 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman 45,24 %
10 NS 4P S+1 650 29.9 99.67
11 NS 4C E+3 -510 5.4 18.00
12 NS 3S S = 600 20.3 67.67 µ Tbl = 61,78 %
a.1 Jacques Podevyn -Francine Belet 32,03 %
13 NS 4C E = -620 20 66.67
14 NS 1S S = 90 24 80.00
15 NS 1S W+2 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 48,89 %
a10 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 56,06 %
16 NS 4P S-1 -50 3.3 11.00
17 NS 3S S = 400 16.1 53.67
18 NS 3S E+1 -430 5.4 18.00 µ Tbl = 27,56 %
a.9 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 45,31 %
19 NS 3K W-3 300 28 93.33
20 NS 4C N = 620 16 53.33
21 NS 1S E-1 50 12 40.00 µ Tbl = 62,22 %
a.7 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 43,43 %
22 NS 5K S+1 420 15 50.00
23 NS 1S E = -90 16.1 53.67
24 NS 4P N+2 480 16.1 53.67 µ Tbl = 52,44 %
a.6 Bruno Quievy -Didier Collart 48,71 %
25 NS 4P W+2 -680 12.9 43.00
26 NS 2P E+2 -170 4.3 14.33
27 NS 2P N-1 -50 15 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,78 %
a.5 Michel Lievens -Helene Christiaens 57,46 %
28 NS 3S E+1 -430 19.3 64.33
29 NS 4P S = 620 7.5 25.00
30 NS 3C N-1 -50 8.6 28.67 µ Tbl = 39,33 %
Total : 341,3 / 720 = 47,40 %
PAIRE A.9 Claire Derieuw -Claire de Quirini
a.7 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 43,43 %
1 NS 1S N+1 120 19.3 64.33
2 NS 3S E-2 100 25.7 85.67
3 NS 4P N = 420 17.2 57.33 µ Tbl = 69,11 %
a.6 Bruno Quievy -Didier Collart 48,71 %
4 NS 4C W = -620 21.4 71.33
5 NS 2C E-1 50 7.5 25.00
6 NS 1S N = 90 21.4 71.33 µ Tbl = 55,89 %
a.5 Michel Lievens -Helene Christiaens 57,46 %
7 NS 3C E-2 200 26.7 89.00
8 NS 5C E+1 -480 3.3 11.00
9 NS 4C N+1 450 19.3 64.33 µ Tbl = 54,78 %
a.3 Jeanine Bontemps -Aida Zumot 50,76 %
10 NS 4P S-1 -100 3.3 11.00
11 NS 4C E+3 -510 5.4 18.00
12 NS 4P S-2 -200 2.2 7.33 µ Tbl = 12,11 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman 45,24 %
13 NS 4C E+2 -680 1 3.33
14 NS 2C W = -110 4 13.33
15 NS 1S W = -90 24 80.00 µ Tbl = 32,22 %
a.1 Jacques Podevyn -Francine Belet 32,03 %
16 NS 4P S+1 450 22.5 75.00
17 NS 3S S = 400 16.1 53.67
18 NS 3S E+1 -430 5.4 18.00 µ Tbl = 48,89 %
a.9 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 45,31 %
25 NS 4P W+3 -710 4.3 14.33
26 NS 3K W-2 200 27.8 92.67
27 NS 3P N-1 -50 15 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,33 %
a.8 - 0,00 %
28 NS BYE 0 0.00
29 NS BYE 0 0.00
30 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 292,8 / 630 = 46,48 %
PAIRE A10 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger
a.9 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 45,31 %
1 NS 1S N+1 120 19.3 64.33
2 NS 2S E+1 -150 0.1 0.33
3 NS 4P N = 420 17.2 57.33 µ Tbl = 40,67 %
a.8 - 0,00 %
4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.7 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 43,43 %
7 NS 2C E-1 100 15 50.00
8 NS 4C E+1 -450 13.9 46.33
9 NS 4C N+1 450 19.3 64.33 µ Tbl = 53,56 %
a.6 Bruno Quievy -Didier Collart 48,71 %
10 NS 1P S+2 140 13.9 46.33
11 NS 4C E+2 -480 10.7 35.67
12 NS 3S S-1 -100 8.6 28.67 µ Tbl = 36,89 %
a.4 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 56,64 %
13 NS 4C E+1 -650 7 23.33
14 NS 1S S = 90 24 80.00
15 NS 1S W+1 -120 11 36.67 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
a.3 Jeanine Bontemps -Aida Zumot 50,76 %
16 NS 4P S = 420 12.9 43.00
17 NS 3S S = 400 16.1 53.67
18 NS 4P E-1 50 26.7 89.00 µ Tbl = 61,89 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman 45,24 %
19 NS 4K W-1 100 14 46.67
20 NS 4C N = 620 16 53.33
21 NS 1S E-1 50 12 40.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
a10 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 56,06 %
28 NS 3S E+2 -460 4.3 14.33
29 NS 4P S+1 650 21.4 71.33
30 NS 3C N-1 -50 8.6 28.67 µ Tbl = 38,11 %
Total : 292,0 / 630 = 46,35 %
PAIRE B.1 Benoit del Marmol -Pascale Ortegat
b.1 Martine Zens -Noelle Fosse 50,53 %
1 NS 1S N = 90 9.7 32.33
2 NS 2C W = -110 15 50.00
3 NS 3S S = 400 11.6 38.67 µ Tbl = 40,33 %
b10 Miguel del Marmol -Gaetan Collinet 54,68 %
4 NS 4C W+2 -680 4.3 14.33
5 NS 1S N = 90 19.3 64.33
6 NS 2C S = 110 24.6 82.00 µ Tbl = 53,56 %
b.9 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 45,57 %
7 NS 2C E-1 100 15 50.00
8 NS 4C E+1 -450 13.9 46.33
9 NS 6C N-1 -50 5.4 18.00 µ Tbl = 38,11 %
b.8 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 47,63 %
10 NS 4P S = 620 27.8 92.67
11 NS 6C E+1 -1010 0.1 0.33
12 NS 3S S = 600 20.3 67.67 µ Tbl = 53,56 %
b.7 Serge Alard -Stan Tabor 51,86 %
13 NS 4C E = -620 20 66.67
14 NS 1S S-1 -50 9 30.00
15 NS 1S W+1 -120 11 36.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
b.5 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 56,82 %
16 NS 4P S-1 -50 3.3 11.00
17 NS 2S S+1 150 6.5 21.67
18 NS 4P E = -420 12.9 43.00 µ Tbl = 25,22 %
b.4 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 52,53 %
19 NS 4K W-1 100 14 46.67
20 NS 4C N = 620 16 53.33
21 NS 2C S+1 140 24 80.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
b.3 Marie Neve -Prisca Tondreau 49,13 %
22 NS 3S S-2 -100 3.3 11.00
23 NS 3T W-1 100 24.6 82.00
24 NS 4P N+2 480 16.1 53.67 µ Tbl = 48,89 %
Total : 327,7 / 720 = 45,51 %
PAIRE A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Caroll Pucher
a.1 Jacques Podevyn -Francine Belet 32,03 %
1 NS 1S E-1 50 3.3 11.00
2 NS 4C W-3 150 29.9 99.67
3 NS 3S S+1 430 25.2 84.00 µ Tbl = 64,89 %
a10 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 56,06 %
4 NS 4C W = -620 21.4 71.33
5 NS 2S N-1 -100 2.2 7.33
6 NS 2C S-1 -50 13.9 46.33 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
a.9 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 45,31 %
7 NS 1S W = -90 8.6 28.67
8 NS 5K E = -400 25.7 85.67
9 NS 4C N+1 450 19.3 64.33 µ Tbl = 59,56 %
a.8 - 0,00 %
10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.7 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne 43,43 %
13 NS 4C E = -620 20 66.67
14 NS 2C W+1 -140 0 0.00
15 NS 1S W+1 -120 11 36.67 µ Tbl = 34,44 %
a.5 Michel Lievens -Helene Christiaens 57,46 %
16 NS 4P S+1 450 22.5 75.00
17 NS 4C N-2 -100 0.1 0.33
18 NS 4P E+1 -450 1.1 3.67 µ Tbl = 26,33 %
a.4 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 56,64 %
19 NS 3K W+1 -130 4 13.33
20 NS 4C N = 620 16 53.33
21 NS 1S E-1 50 12 40.00 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
a.3 Jeanine Bontemps -Aida Zumot 50,76 %
22 NS 6K S = 920 25.7 85.67
23 NS 2S W = -120 4.3 14.33
24 NS 4P N+2 480 16.1 53.67 µ Tbl = 51,22 %
Total : 282,3 / 630 = 44,81 %
PAIRE B.8 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson
b.5 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 56,82 %
1 NS 2C W-2 100 15 50.00
2 NS 2C W = -110 15 50.00
3 NS 4P S-1 -50 2.4 8.00 µ Tbl = 36,00 %
b.4 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 52,53 %
4 NS 4C W+2 -680 4.3 14.33
5 NS 1S N = 90 19.3 64.33
6 NS 2C S = 110 24.6 82.00 µ Tbl = 53,56 %
b.2 Diane della Faille -Elie Behaghel 58,85 %
7 NS 2C E-1 100 15 50.00
8 NS 4C E+1 -450 13.9 46.33
9 NS 6C N-1 -50 5.4 18.00 µ Tbl = 38,11 %
b.1 Martine Zens -Noelle Fosse 50,53 %
10 NS 2P S+3 200 24.6 82.00
11 NS 6C E-1 50 27.8 92.67
12 NS 3S N+1 630 28.9 96.33 µ Tbl = 90,33 %
b10 Miguel del Marmol -Gaetan Collinet 54,68 %
13 NS 3C E+2 -200 30 100.00
14 NS 2P E = -110 4 13.33
15 NS 1S W+1 -120 11 36.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
b.8 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 47,63 %
22 NS 3S S-2 -100 3.3 11.00
23 NS 1S E+3 -180 0.1 0.33
24 NS 4P N+2 480 16.1 53.67 µ Tbl = 21,67 %
b.7 Serge Alard -Stan Tabor 51,86 %
25 NS 6P W = -1430 1.1 3.67
26 NS 1P E+1 -110 18.2 60.67
27 NS 3P N-2 -100 6.5 21.67 µ Tbl = 28,67 %
b.6 Simone Munsterhjelm -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 47,00 %
28 NS 5T E-4 200 29.9 99.67
29 NS 6P S-2 -200 0.1 0.33
30 NS 2CcN-1 -100 2.2 7.33 µ Tbl = 35,78 %
Total : 318,7 / 720 = 44,26 %
PAIRE A.6 Andre Delacroix -Muriel de Ceuninck
a10 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 56,06 %
1 NS 1S N = 90 9.7 32.33
2 NS 2S E = -120 8.6 28.67
3 NS 4P N = 420 17.2 57.33 µ Tbl = 39,44 %
a.9 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 45,31 %
4 NS 4C W+2 -680 4.3 14.33
5 NS 1S N = 90 19.3 64.33
6 NS 2C S-1 -50 13.9 46.33 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
a.8 - 0,00 %
7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.6 Bruno Quievy -Didier Collart 48,71 %
16 NS 3S N = 400 9.7 32.33
17 NS 3S S = 400 16.1 53.67
18 NS 4P E = -420 12.9 43.00 µ Tbl = 43,00 %
a.5 Michel Lievens -Helene Christiaens 57,46 %
19 NS 3K W+1 -130 4 13.33
20 NS 4C S = 620 16 53.33
21 NS 1S E-1 50 12 40.00 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
a.4 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 56,64 %
22 NS 5K S+1 420 15 50.00
23 NS 1S E = -90 16.1 53.67
24 NS 2P N+4 230 0.1 0.33 µ Tbl = 34,67 %
a.3 Jeanine Bontemps -Aida Zumot 50,76 %
25 NS 4P W+2 -680 12.9 43.00
26 NS 2S W-3 300 29.9 99.67
27 NS 2S S-3 -150 3.3 11.00 µ Tbl = 51,22 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman 45,24 %
28 NS 4C W+1 -450 12.9 43.00
29 NS 4P S+1 650 21.4 71.33
30 NS 3K E-1 50 16.1 53.67 µ Tbl = 56,00 %
Total : 271,4 / 630 = 43,08 %
PAIRE B.2 Sophie Noach -Marie Claire Vienne
b.2 Diane della Faille -Elie Behaghel 58,85 %
4 NS 4C W+2 -680 4.3 14.33
5 NS 3S N-2 -200 0.1 0.33
6 NS 3S N-2 -100 4.3 14.33 µ Tbl = 9,67 %
b.1 Martine Zens -Noelle Fosse 50,53 %
7 NS 3K S-1 -100 6.5 21.67
8 NS 4PcN-6 -1400 0.1 0.33
9 NS 4C N+1 450 19.3 64.33 µ Tbl = 28,78 %
b10 Miguel del Marmol -Gaetan Collinet 54,68 %
10 NS 3P S = 140 13.9 46.33
11 NS 4C E+1 -450 19.3 64.33
12 NS 3S S-1 -100 8.6 28.67 µ Tbl = 46,44 %
b.9 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 45,57 %
13 NS 4C E = -620 20 66.67
14 NS 1S S = 90 24 80.00
15 NS 1S W+1 -120 11 36.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
b.8 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 47,63 %
16 NS 4P S+1 450 22.5 75.00
17 NS 3S S = 400 16.1 53.67
18 NS 3S E = -400 20.3 67.67 µ Tbl = 65,44 %
b.6 Simone Munsterhjelm -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 47,00 %
19 NS 4K W-1 100 14 46.67
20 NS 3S N-3 -300 0 0.00
21 NS 1S E+1 -120 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 15,56 %
b.5 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 56,82 %
22 NS 3S S-2 -100 3.3 11.00
23 NS 2C E-2 200 28.9 96.33
24 NS 4P N+2 480 16.1 53.67 µ Tbl = 53,67 %
b.4 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 52,53 %
25 NS 3T N-2 -100 25.7 85.67
26 NS 4PcE = -790 0.1 0.33
27 NS 2P N-1 -50 15 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,33 %
Total : 293,4 / 720 = 40,75 %
PAIRE b.2 Diane della Faille -Elie Behaghel
B.2 Sophie Noach -Marie Claire Vienne 40,75 %
4 EO 4C W+2 -680 25.7 85.67
5 EO 3S N-2 -200 29.9 99.67
6 EO 3S N-2 -100 25.7 85.67 µ Tbl = 90,33 %
B.8 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 44,26 %
7 EO 2C E-1 100 15 50.00
8 EO 4C E+1 -450 16.1 53.67
9 EO 6C N-1 -50 24.6 82.00 µ Tbl = 61,89 %
B.3 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy 53,17 %
10 EO 2P S+1 140 16.1 53.67
11 EO 4C E+1 -450 10.7 35.67
12 EO 3S S = 600 9.7 32.33 µ Tbl = 40,56 %
B.9 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin 51,22 %
13 EO 4C E+1 -650 23 76.67
14 EO 1S S = 90 6 20.00
15 EO 1S W+1 -120 19 63.33 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
B.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 48,28 %
16 EO 4P S+1 450 7.5 25.00
17 EO 3S S+1 430 3.3 11.00
18 EO 4P E+1 -450 28.9 96.33 µ Tbl = 44,11 %
B10 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 50,78 %
19 EO 4P W-2 200 8 26.67
20 EO 4C S = 620 14 46.67
21 EO 1S E = -90 28 93.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
B.5 Patrick Gilles -Jean Marie Schmiliver 52,22 %
22 EO 6K S = 940 0.1 0.33
23 EO 2S W = -120 25.7 85.67
24 EO 3S S+2 460 25.7 85.67 µ Tbl = 57,22 %
B.6 Annie Zeimes -Madeleine Gabriel 51,14 %
28 EO 3S E+2 -460 25.7 85.67
29 EO 2P S+3 200 27.8 92.67
30 EO 2C N = 110 7.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 67,78 %
Total : 423,7 / 720 = 58,85 %
PAIRE a.5 Michel Lievens -Helene Christiaens
A.8 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Jeannine Wanderpepen 55,19 %
1 EO 1S N = 90 20.3 67.67
2 EO 1S E+1 -120 21.4 71.33
3 EO 2P N+1 140 21.8 72.67 µ Tbl = 70,56 %
A.9 Claire Derieuw -Claire de Quirini 46,48 %
7 EO 3C E-2 200 3.3 11.00
8 EO 5C E+1 -480 26.7 89.00
9 EO 4C N+1 450 10.7 35.67 µ Tbl = 45,22 %
A.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Colette Heerinckx 50,79 %
13 EO 4C E+2 -680 29 96.67
14 EO 2C W-1 50 16 53.33
15 EO 1S W-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Caroll Pucher 44,81 %
16 EO 4P S+1 450 7.5 25.00
17 EO 4C N-2 -100 29.9 99.67
18 EO 4P E+1 -450 28.9 96.33 µ Tbl = 73,67 %
A.6 Andre Delacroix -Muriel de Ceuninck 43,08 %
19 EO 3K W+1 -130 26 86.67
20 EO 4C S = 620 14 46.67
21 EO 1S E-1 50 18 60.00 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 69,48 %
22 EO 6K S = 920 4.3 14.33
23 EO 1S E = -90 13.9 46.33
24 EO 4P N+2 480 13.9 46.33 µ Tbl = 35,67 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia 62,13 %
25 EO 6P W = -1430 28.9 96.33
26 EO 2P E+1 -140 20.3 67.67
27 EO 2P N = 110 4.3 14.33 µ Tbl = 59,44 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 47,40 %
28 EO 3S E+1 -430 10.7 35.67
29 EO 4P S = 620 22.5 75.00
30 EO 3C N-1 -50 21.4 71.33 µ Tbl = 60,67 %
Total : 413,7 / 720 = 57,46 %
PAIRE b.5 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels
B.8 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 44,26 %
1 EO 2C W-2 100 15 50.00
2 EO 2C W = -110 15 50.00
3 EO 4P S-1 -50 27.6 92.00 µ Tbl = 64,00 %
B.9 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin 51,22 %
7 EO 2C E = -110 26.7 89.00
8 EO 4C E+1 -450 16.1 53.67
9 EO 4P N-3 -150 29.9 99.67 µ Tbl = 80,78 %
B.5 Patrick Gilles -Jean Marie Schmiliver 52,22 %
13 EO 4C E = -620 10 33.33
14 EO 2K W-1 50 16 53.33
15 EO 1S W = -90 6 20.00 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
B.1 Benoit del Marmol -Pascale Ortegat 45,51 %
16 EO 4P S-1 -50 26.7 89.00
17 EO 2S S+1 150 23.5 78.33
18 EO 4P E = -420 17.1 57.00 µ Tbl = 74,78 %
B.6 Annie Zeimes -Madeleine Gabriel 51,14 %
19 EO 3S E-3 300 2 6.67
20 EO 4C N = 620 14 46.67
21 EO 1S E-1 50 18 60.00 µ Tbl = 37,78 %
B.2 Sophie Noach -Marie Claire Vienne 40,75 %
22 EO 3S S-2 -100 26.7 89.00
23 EO 2C E-2 200 1.1 3.67
24 EO 4P N+2 480 13.9 46.33 µ Tbl = 46,33 %
B.7 Nicole Blondeau -Annie Legrand 48,50 %
25 EO 5P W+1 -680 17.1 57.00
26 EO 3S E = -600 27.8 92.67
27 EO 2P N-1 -50 15 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,56 %
B.3 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy 53,17 %
28 EO 3S E+1 -430 10.7 35.67
29 EO 4P S = 620 22.5 75.00
30 EO 1S W-2 100 10.7 35.67 µ Tbl = 48,78 %
Total : 409,1 / 720 = 56,82 %
PAIRE a.4 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys
A.8 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Jeannine Wanderpepen 55,19 %
4 EO 4C W = -620 8.6 28.67
5 EO 1S N+1 120 0.1 0.33
6 EO 2C S-2 -100 25.7 85.67 µ Tbl = 38,22 %
A.4 Annette Fobe -Myriam de Timary 49,37 %
10 EO 4P S-1 -100 26.7 89.00
11 EO 4C E+3 -510 24.6 82.00
12 EO 3S N-2 -200 27.8 92.67 µ Tbl = 87,89 %
A10 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 46,35 %
13 EO 4C E+1 -650 23 76.67
14 EO 1S S = 90 6 20.00
15 EO 1S W+1 -120 19 63.33 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
A.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Colette Heerinckx 50,79 %
16 EO 3S N = 400 20.3 67.67
17 EO 3S S-1 -50 26.7 89.00
18 EO 4P E = -420 17.1 57.00 µ Tbl = 71,22 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Caroll Pucher 44,81 %
19 EO 3K W+1 -130 26 86.67
20 EO 4C N = 620 14 46.67
21 EO 1S E-1 50 18 60.00 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
A.6 Andre Delacroix -Muriel de Ceuninck 43,08 %
22 EO 5K S+1 420 15 50.00
23 EO 1S E = -90 13.9 46.33
24 EO 2P N+4 230 29.9 99.67 µ Tbl = 65,33 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 69,48 %
25 EO 4P W+2 -680 17.1 57.00
26 EO 2P E = -110 11.8 39.33
27 EO 2P N+1 140 1.1 3.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia 62,13 %
28 EO 4C W = -420 5.4 18.00
29 EO 4P S+1 650 8.6 28.67
30 EO 2C N-1 -50 21.4 71.33 µ Tbl = 39,33 %
Total : 407,8 / 720 = 56,64 %
PAIRE a10 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve
A.6 Andre Delacroix -Muriel de Ceuninck 43,08 %
1 EO 1S N = 90 20.3 67.67
2 EO 2S E = -120 21.4 71.33
3 EO 4P N = 420 12.8 42.67 µ Tbl = 60,56 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Caroll Pucher 44,81 %
4 EO 4C W = -620 8.6 28.67
5 EO 2S N-1 -100 27.8 92.67
6 EO 2C S-1 -50 16.1 53.67 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia 62,13 %
7 EO 3P N-2 -200 29.9 99.67
8 EO 4C E+1 -450 16.1 53.67
9 EO 4C N+2 480 1.1 3.67 µ Tbl = 52,33 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 69,48 %
10 EO 1P S+3 170 8.6 28.67
11 EO 4C E+1 -450 10.7 35.67
12 EO 3S S = 600 9.7 32.33 µ Tbl = 32,22 %
A.8 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Jeannine Wanderpepen 55,19 %
13 EO 4C E = -620 10 33.33
14 EO 2S W-1 50 16 53.33
15 EO 1S W+1 -120 19 63.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 47,40 %
16 EO 4P S-1 -50 26.7 89.00
17 EO 3S S = 400 13.9 46.33
18 EO 3S E+1 -430 24.6 82.00 µ Tbl = 72,44 %
A.4 Annette Fobe -Myriam de Timary 49,37 %
22 EO 5K S+1 420 15 50.00
23 EO 1S E+1 -120 25.7 85.67
24 EO 4P N+2 480 13.9 46.33 µ Tbl = 60,67 %
A10 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 46,35 %
28 EO 3S E+2 -460 25.7 85.67
29 EO 4P S+1 650 8.6 28.67
30 EO 3C N-1 -50 21.4 71.33 µ Tbl = 61,89 %
Total : 403,6 / 720 = 56,06 %
PAIRE b10 Miguel del Marmol -Gaetan Collinet
B.6 Annie Zeimes -Madeleine Gabriel 51,14 %
1 EO 2C W-1 50 26.7 89.00
2 EO 2C W+1 -140 26.7 89.00
3 EO 4P S-1 -50 27.6 92.00 µ Tbl = 90,00 %
B.1 Benoit del Marmol -Pascale Ortegat 45,51 %
4 EO 4C W+2 -680 25.7 85.67
5 EO 1S N = 90 10.7 35.67
6 EO 2C S = 110 5.4 18.00 µ Tbl = 46,44 %
B.7 Nicole Blondeau -Annie Legrand 48,50 %
7 EO 3C E-2 200 3.3 11.00
8 EO 4C E+2 -480 26.7 89.00
9 EO 6C N-1 -50 24.6 82.00 µ Tbl = 60,67 %
B.2 Sophie Noach -Marie Claire Vienne 40,75 %
10 EO 3P S = 140 16.1 53.67
11 EO 4C E+1 -450 10.7 35.67
12 EO 3S S-1 -100 21.4 71.33 µ Tbl = 53,56 %
B.8 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 44,26 %
13 EO 3C E+2 -200 0 0.00
14 EO 2P E = -110 26 86.67
15 EO 1S W+1 -120 19 63.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
B.3 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy 53,17 %
16 EO 4P S+1 450 7.5 25.00
17 EO 3S S = 400 13.9 46.33
18 EO 4P E = -420 17.1 57.00 µ Tbl = 42,78 %
B.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 48,28 %
22 EO 5K S+1 420 15 50.00
23 EO 1S E = -90 13.9 46.33
24 EO 4P N+2 480 13.9 46.33 µ Tbl = 47,56 %
B10 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 50,78 %
28 EO 3S E+2 -460 25.7 85.67
29 EO 5P S = 650 8.6 28.67
30 EO 2C N = 110 7.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 46,44 %
Total : 393,7 / 720 = 54,68 %
PAIRE b.4 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw
B.8 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 44,26 %
4 EO 4C W+2 -680 25.7 85.67
5 EO 1S N = 90 10.7 35.67
6 EO 2C S = 110 5.4 18.00 µ Tbl = 46,44 %
B.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 48,28 %
10 EO 2P S+1 140 16.1 53.67
11 EO 4C E+1 -450 10.7 35.67
12 EO 2S S+1 150 17.1 57.00 µ Tbl = 48,78 %
B10 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 50,78 %
13 EO 4C E+1 -650 23 76.67
14 EO 1S S = 90 6 20.00
15 EO 1S W+1 -120 19 63.33 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
B.5 Patrick Gilles -Jean Marie Schmiliver 52,22 %
16 EO 4P S-1 -50 26.7 89.00
17 EO 3S S = 400 13.9 46.33
18 EO 4P E = -420 17.1 57.00 µ Tbl = 64,11 %
B.1 Benoit del Marmol -Pascale Ortegat 45,51 %
19 EO 4K W-1 100 16 53.33
20 EO 4C N = 620 14 46.67
21 EO 2C S+1 140 6 20.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
B.6 Annie Zeimes -Madeleine Gabriel 51,14 %
22 EO 3S S-2 -100 26.7 89.00
23 EO 1S E = -90 13.9 46.33
24 EO 4P N+2 480 13.9 46.33 µ Tbl = 60,56 %
B.2 Sophie Noach -Marie Claire Vienne 40,75 %
25 EO 3T N-2 -100 4.3 14.33
26 EO 4PcE = -790 29.9 99.67
27 EO 2P N-1 -50 15 50.00 µ Tbl = 54,67 %
B.7 Nicole Blondeau -Annie Legrand 48,50 %
28 EO 4C W+1 -450 17.1 57.00
29 EO 5P S = 650 8.6 28.67
30 EO 2C N-1 -50 21.4 71.33 µ Tbl = 52,33 %
Total : 378,2 / 720 = 52,53 %
PAIRE b.7 Serge Alard -Stan Tabor
B.9 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin 51,22 %
1 EO 1S N+2 150 3.3 11.00
2 EO 2C W = -110 15 50.00
3 EO 4P N = 420 12.8 42.67 µ Tbl = 34,56 %
B.5 Patrick Gilles -Jean Marie Schmiliver 52,22 %
4 EO 4C W = -620 8.6 28.67
5 EO 2C E-1 50 22.5 75.00
6 EO 2C S-2 -100 25.7 85.67 µ Tbl = 63,11 %
B10 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 50,78 %
7 EO 3C E-2 200 3.3 11.00
8 EO 5C E = -450 16.1 53.67
9 EO 4C N+1 450 10.7 35.67 µ Tbl = 33,44 %
B.1 Benoit del Marmol -Pascale Ortegat 45,51 %
13 EO 4C E = -620 10 33.33
14 EO 1S S-1 -50 21 70.00
15 EO 1S W+1 -120 19 63.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
B.7 Nicole Blondeau -Annie Legrand 48,50 %
19 EO 5K W-1 100 16 53.33
20 EO 4C N = 620 14 46.67
21 EO 1S E-1 50 18 60.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
B.3 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy 53,17 %
22 EO 5K S+1 420 15 50.00
23 EO 1S E = -90 13.9 46.33
24 EO 3CcW-5 1100 0.1 0.33 µ Tbl = 32,22 %
B.8 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 44,26 %
25 EO 6P W = -1430 28.9 96.33
26 EO 1P E+1 -110 11.8 39.33
27 EO 3P N-2 -100 23.5 78.33 µ Tbl = 71,33 %
B.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 48,28 %
28 EO 3S E+2 -460 25.7 85.67
29 EO 4P S+1 650 8.6 28.67
30 EO 3CcN-2 -300 29.9 99.67 µ Tbl = 71,33 %
Total : 373,4 / 720 = 51,86 %
PAIRE a.3 Jeanine Bontemps -Aida Zumot
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia 62,13 %
1 EO 1S N+2 150 3.3 11.00
2 EO 4C W-2 100 4.3 14.33
3 EO 3S S+1 430 4.8 16.00 µ Tbl = 13,78 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 47,40 %
7 EO 2C W = -110 26.7 89.00
8 EO 4C E = -420 6.5 21.67
9 EO 4C N+1 450 10.7 35.67 µ Tbl = 48,78 %
A.9 Claire Derieuw -Claire de Quirini 46,48 %
10 EO 4P S-1 -100 26.7 89.00
11 EO 4C E+3 -510 24.6 82.00
12 EO 4P S-2 -200 27.8 92.67 µ Tbl = 87,89 %
A.4 Annette Fobe -Myriam de Timary 49,37 %
13 EO 4C E+1 -650 23 76.67
14 EO 2C W = -110 26 86.67
15 EO 1S W+1 -120 19 63.33 µ Tbl = 75,56 %
A10 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 46,35 %
16 EO 4P S = 420 17.1 57.00
17 EO 3S S = 400 13.9 46.33
18 EO 4P E-1 50 3.3 11.00 µ Tbl = 38,11 %
A.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Colette Heerinckx 50,79 %
19 EO 4P E-2 200 8 26.67
20 EO 4C N = 620 14 46.67
21 EO 1S E-1 50 18 60.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Caroll Pucher 44,81 %
22 EO 6K S = 920 4.3 14.33
23 EO 2S W = -120 25.7 85.67
24 EO 4P N+2 480 13.9 46.33 µ Tbl = 48,78 %
A.6 Andre Delacroix -Muriel de Ceuninck 43,08 %
25 EO 4P W+2 -680 17.1 57.00
26 EO 2S W-3 300 0.1 0.33
27 EO 2S S-3 -150 26.7 89.00 µ Tbl = 48,78 %
Total : 365,5 / 720 = 50,76 %
PAIRE b.1 Martine Zens -Noelle Fosse
B.1 Benoit del Marmol -Pascale Ortegat 45,51 %
1 EO 1S N = 90 20.3 67.67
2 EO 2C W = -110 15 50.00
3 EO 3S S = 400 18.4 61.33 µ Tbl = 59,67 %
B.7 Nicole Blondeau -Annie Legrand 48,50 %
4 EO 4C W+1 -650 18.2 60.67
5 EO 1S N = 90 10.7 35.67
6 EO 1S W+1 -120 29.9 99.67 µ Tbl = 65,33 %
B.2 Sophie Noach -Marie Claire Vienne 40,75 %
7 EO 3K S-1 -100 23.5 78.33
8 EO 4PcN-6 -1400 29.9 99.67
9 EO 4C N+1 450 10.7 35.67 µ Tbl = 71,22 %
B.8 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 44,26 %
10 EO 2P S+3 200 5.4 18.00
11 EO 6C E-1 50 2.2 7.33
12 EO 3S N+1 630 1.1 3.67 µ Tbl = 9,67 %
B.3 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy 53,17 %
13 EO 4C E = -620 10 33.33
14 EO 1S S-1 -50 21 70.00
15 EO 1S W = -90 6 20.00 µ Tbl = 41,11 %
B.9 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin 51,22 %
16 EO 4P S+1 450 7.5 25.00
17 EO 3S S-1 -50 26.7 89.00
18 EO 4P E-1 50 3.3 11.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
B.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 48,28 %
19 EO 3K W+1 -130 26 86.67
20 EO 4C N = 620 14 46.67
21 EO 1S E-1 50 18 60.00 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
B.5 Patrick Gilles -Jean Marie Schmiliver 52,22 %
25 EO 4P W+1 -650 7.5 25.00
26 EO 1S W+2 -150 23.5 78.33
27 EO 2P N-1 -50 15 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,11 %
Total : 363,8 / 720 = 50,53 %
PAIRE b.3 Marie Neve -Prisca Tondreau
B.7 Nicole Blondeau -Annie Legrand 48,50 %
1 EO 1S N+2 150 3.3 11.00
2 EO 2S E = -120 21.4 71.33
3 EO 3S S+1 430 4.8 16.00 µ Tbl = 32,78 %
B.3 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy 53,17 %
7 EO 3C E-2 200 3.3 11.00
8 EO 4C E+1 -450 16.1 53.67
9 EO 3S S = 400 19.3 64.33 µ Tbl = 43,00 %
B.9 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin 51,22 %
10 EO 4P S-1 -100 26.7 89.00
11 EO 4C E+3 -510 24.6 82.00
12 EO 3S S = 600 9.7 32.33 µ Tbl = 67,78 %
B.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 48,28 %
13 EO 4C E = -620 10 33.33
14 EO 1S S = 90 6 20.00
15 EO 1S W+1 -120 19 63.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
B10 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 50,78 %
16 EO 4P S-1 -50 26.7 89.00
17 EO 3S S = 400 13.9 46.33
18 EO 3S E = -400 9.7 32.33 µ Tbl = 55,89 %
B.5 Patrick Gilles -Jean Marie Schmiliver 52,22 %
19 EO 3T W+1 -130 26 86.67
20 EO 4C N = 620 14 46.67
21 EO 3C S+1 170 4 13.33 µ Tbl = 48,89 %
B.1 Benoit del Marmol -Pascale Ortegat 45,51 %
22 EO 3S S-2 -100 26.7 89.00
23 EO 3T W-1 100 5.4 18.00
24 EO 4P N+2 480 13.9 46.33 µ Tbl = 51,11 %
B.6 Annie Zeimes -Madeleine Gabriel 51,14 %
25 EO 4P W+1 -650 7.5 25.00
26 EO 2T W+1 -110 11.8 39.33
27 EO 3S S-5 -250 29.9 99.67 µ Tbl = 54,67 %
Total : 353,7 / 720 = 49,13 %
PAIRE a.6 Bruno Quievy -Didier Collart
A.4 Annette Fobe -Myriam de Timary 49,37 %
1 EO 1S N+2 150 3.3 11.00
2 EO 3S E-1 50 9.7 32.33
3 EO 4P N-1 -50 27.6 92.00 µ Tbl = 45,11 %
A.9 Claire Derieuw -Claire de Quirini 46,48 %
4 EO 4C W = -620 8.6 28.67
5 EO 2C E-1 50 22.5 75.00
6 EO 1S N = 90 8.6 28.67 µ Tbl = 44,11 %
A10 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 46,35 %
10 EO 1P S+2 140 16.1 53.67
11 EO 4C E+2 -480 19.3 64.33
12 EO 3S S-1 -100 21.4 71.33 µ Tbl = 63,11 %
A.6 Andre Delacroix -Muriel de Ceuninck 43,08 %
16 EO 3S N = 400 20.3 67.67
17 EO 3S S = 400 13.9 46.33
18 EO 4P E = -420 17.1 57.00 µ Tbl = 57,00 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 69,48 %
19 EO 3P E-1 100 16 53.33
20 EO 4C N = 620 14 46.67
21 EO 1S E-2 100 8 26.67 µ Tbl = 42,22 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia 62,13 %
22 EO 5K S+1 420 15 50.00
23 EO 2S W-1 100 5.4 18.00
24 EO 4P N+2 480 13.9 46.33 µ Tbl = 38,11 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 47,40 %
25 EO 4P W+2 -680 17.1 57.00
26 EO 2P E+2 -170 25.7 85.67
27 EO 2P N-1 -50 15 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,22 %
A.8 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Jeannine Wanderpepen 55,19 %
28 EO 1TcE+2 -340 2.2 7.33
29 EO 5P S = 650 8.6 28.67
30 EO 2C N-1 -50 21.4 71.33 µ Tbl = 35,78 %
Total : 350,7 / 720 = 48,71 %
PAIRE b.8 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse
B.5 Patrick Gilles -Jean Marie Schmiliver 52,22 %
1 EO 1S N-1 -50 29.9 99.67
2 EO 3C W-1 50 9.7 32.33
3 EO 4P N+1 450 0.2 0.67 µ Tbl = 44,22 %
B10 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 50,78 %
4 EO 4C W+1 -650 18.2 60.67
5 EO 1S N = 90 10.7 35.67
6 EO 1S W = -90 21.4 71.33 µ Tbl = 55,89 %
B.6 Annie Zeimes -Madeleine Gabriel 51,14 %
7 EO 3C E-1 100 15 50.00
8 EO 3S E-3 150 0.1 0.33
9 EO 6C N-1 -50 24.6 82.00 µ Tbl = 44,11 %
B.1 Benoit del Marmol -Pascale Ortegat 45,51 %
10 EO 4P S = 620 2.2 7.33
11 EO 6C E+1 -1010 29.9 99.67
12 EO 3S S = 600 9.7 32.33 µ Tbl = 46,44 %
B.2 Sophie Noach -Marie Claire Vienne 40,75 %
16 EO 4P S+1 450 7.5 25.00
17 EO 3S S = 400 13.9 46.33
18 EO 3S E = -400 9.7 32.33 µ Tbl = 34,56 %
B.8 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 44,26 %
22 EO 3S S-2 -100 26.7 89.00
23 EO 1S E+3 -180 29.9 99.67
24 EO 4P N+2 480 13.9 46.33 µ Tbl = 78,33 %
B.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 48,28 %
25 EO 4P W+2 -680 17.1 57.00
26 EO 2P E-1 100 4.3 14.33
27 EO 2P N-1 -50 15 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,44 %
B.9 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin 51,22 %
28 EO 3S E+1 -430 10.7 35.67
29 EO 4P S = 620 22.5 75.00
30 EO 2CcN+1 570 0.1 0.33 µ Tbl = 37,00 %
Total : 342,9 / 720 = 47,63 %
PAIRE b.6 Simone Munsterhjelm -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
B.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 48,28 %
1 EO 1S N+1 120 10.7 35.67
2 EO 2C W+1 -140 26.7 89.00
3 EO 50%60% Ajust 18 60.00 µ Tbl = 61,56 %
B.9 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin 51,22 %
4 EO 3P N-2 -200 0.1 0.33
5 EO 1S N = 90 10.7 35.67
6 EO 2C S-1 -50 16.1 53.67 µ Tbl = 29,89 %
B10 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 50,78 %
10 EO 1P S+4 200 5.4 18.00
11 EO 4C E+1 -450 10.7 35.67
12 EO 3S S-1 -100 21.4 71.33 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
B.6 Annie Zeimes -Madeleine Gabriel 51,14 %
16 EO 4P S+1 450 7.5 25.00
17 EO 3S S+2 460 0.1 0.33
18 EO 4P E-1 50 3.3 11.00 µ Tbl = 12,11 %
B.2 Sophie Noach -Marie Claire Vienne 40,75 %
19 EO 4K W-1 100 16 53.33
20 EO 3S N-3 -300 30 100.00
21 EO 1S E+1 -120 30 100.00 µ Tbl = 84,44 %
B.7 Nicole Blondeau -Annie Legrand 48,50 %
22 EO 5K S+1 420 15 50.00
23 EO 2C E-2 200 1.1 3.67
24 EO 6P N = 980 2.2 7.33 µ Tbl = 20,33 %
B.3 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy 53,17 %
25 EO 4P W+2 -680 17.1 57.00
26 EO 2P E = -110 11.8 39.33
27 EO 1S W+2 -150 26.7 89.00 µ Tbl = 61,78 %
B.8 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 44,26 %
28 EO 5T E-4 200 0.1 0.33
29 EO 6P S-2 -200 29.9 99.67
30 EO 2CcN-1 -100 27.8 92.67 µ Tbl = 64,22 %
Total : 338,4 / 720 = 47,00 %
PAIRE b.9 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire
B10 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Duren 50,78 %
1 EO 1S N = 90 20.3 67.67
2 EO 4C W-2 100 4.3 14.33
3 EO 2P N+1 140 21.8 72.67 µ Tbl = 51,56 %
B.6 Annie Zeimes -Madeleine Gabriel 51,14 %
4 EO 4C W = -620 8.6 28.67
5 EO 3C E-2 100 2.2 7.33
6 EO Pass Passe 10.7 35.67 µ Tbl = 23,89 %
B.1 Benoit del Marmol -Pascale Ortegat 45,51 %
7 EO 2C E-1 100 15 50.00
8 EO 4C E+1 -450 16.1 53.67
9 EO 6C N-1 -50 24.6 82.00 µ Tbl = 61,89 %
B.7 Nicole Blondeau -Annie Legrand 48,50 %
10 EO 2P S+1 140 16.1 53.67
11 EO 4C E+1 -450 10.7 35.67
12 EO 4P S-2 -200 27.8 92.67 µ Tbl = 60,67 %
B.2 Sophie Noach -Marie Claire Vienne 40,75 %
13 EO 4C E = -620 10 33.33
14 EO 1S S = 90 6 20.00
15 EO 1S W+1 -120 19 63.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
B.3 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy 53,17 %
19 EO 3K W+1 -130 26 86.67
20 EO 4C N = 620 14 46.67
21 EO 1S E-1 50 18 60.00 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
B.9 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin 51,22 %
25 EO 4P W+2 -680 17.1 57.00
26 EO 1S W+1 -120 17.1 57.00
27 EO 3C W-1 50 6.5 21.67 µ Tbl = 45,22 %
B.5 Patrick Gilles -Jean Marie Schmiliver 52,22 %
28 EO 4C W = -420 5.4 18.00
29 EO 4P S+1 650 8.6 28.67
30 EO 1S W-4 200 2.2 7.33 µ Tbl = 18,00 %
Total : 328,1 / 720 = 45,57 %
PAIRE a.9 Edith Close -Jan Sassen
A10 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 46,35 %
1 EO 1S N+1 120 10.7 35.67
2 EO 2S E+1 -150 29.9 99.67
3 EO 4P N = 420 12.8 42.67 µ Tbl = 59,33 %
A.6 Andre Delacroix -Muriel de Ceuninck 43,08 %
4 EO 4C W+2 -680 25.7 85.67
5 EO 1S N = 90 10.7 35.67
6 EO 2C S-1 -50 16.1 53.67 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Caroll Pucher 44,81 %
7 EO 1S W = -90 21.4 71.33
8 EO 5K E = -400 4.3 14.33
9 EO 4C N+1 450 10.7 35.67 µ Tbl = 40,44 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia 62,13 %
10 EO 2P S+1 140 16.1 53.67
11 EO 4C E+1 -450 10.7 35.67
12 EO 3S S = 600 9.7 32.33 µ Tbl = 40,56 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 69,48 %
13 EO 4C E = -620 10 33.33
14 EO 1S S = 90 6 20.00
15 EO 1P W = -80 2 6.67 µ Tbl = 20,00 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 47,40 %
19 EO 3K W-3 300 2 6.67
20 EO 4C N = 620 14 46.67
21 EO 1S E-1 50 18 60.00 µ Tbl = 37,78 %
A.9 Claire Derieuw -Claire de Quirini 46,48 %
25 EO 4P W+3 -710 25.7 85.67
26 EO 3K W-2 200 2.2 7.33
27 EO 3P N-1 -50 15 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,67 %
A.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Colette Heerinckx 50,79 %
28 EO 3S E+2 -460 25.7 85.67
29 EO 4P S = 620 22.5 75.00
30 EO 2C N+1 140 4.3 14.33 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
Total : 326,2 / 720 = 45,31 %
PAIRE a.2 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 69,48 %
4 EO 4C W = -620 8.6 28.67
5 EO 2C E-1 50 22.5 75.00
6 EO 1S W-2 200 2.2 7.33 µ Tbl = 37,00 %
A.8 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Jeannine Wanderpepen 55,19 %
7 EO 2C E-1 100 15 50.00
8 EO 4C E+1 -450 16.1 53.67
9 EO 4C N+1 450 10.7 35.67 µ Tbl = 46,44 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 47,40 %
10 EO 4P S+1 650 0.1 0.33
11 EO 4C E+3 -510 24.6 82.00
12 EO 3S S = 600 9.7 32.33 µ Tbl = 38,22 %
A.9 Claire Derieuw -Claire de Quirini 46,48 %
13 EO 4C E+2 -680 29 96.67
14 EO 2C W = -110 26 86.67
15 EO 1S W = -90 6 20.00 µ Tbl = 67,78 %
A.4 Annette Fobe -Myriam de Timary 49,37 %
16 EO 4P S+1 450 7.5 25.00
17 EO 3S S+1 430 3.3 11.00
18 EO 3S E-1 50 3.3 11.00 µ Tbl = 15,67 %
A10 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 46,35 %
19 EO 4K W-1 100 16 53.33
20 EO 4C N = 620 14 46.67
21 EO 1S E-1 50 18 60.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
A.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Colette Heerinckx 50,79 %
22 EO 6K S = 920 4.3 14.33
23 EO 2C E = -110 21.4 71.33
24 EO 4P S+1 450 27.8 92.67 µ Tbl = 59,44 %
A.6 Andre Delacroix -Muriel de Ceuninck 43,08 %
28 EO 4C W+1 -450 17.1 57.00
29 EO 4P S+1 650 8.6 28.67
30 EO 3K E-1 50 13.9 46.33 µ Tbl = 44,00 %
Total : 325,7 / 720 = 45,24 %
PAIRE a.7 Mercedes Steed -Jean de Villenfagne
A.9 Claire Derieuw -Claire de Quirini 46,48 %
1 EO 1S N+1 120 10.7 35.67
2 EO 3S E-2 100 4.3 14.33
3 EO 4P N = 420 12.8 42.67 µ Tbl = 30,89 %
A.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Colette Heerinckx 50,79 %
4 EO 4C W = -620 8.6 28.67
5 EO 2C E-1 50 22.5 75.00
6 EO 2S N-1 -50 16.1 53.67 µ Tbl = 52,44 %
A10 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 46,35 %
7 EO 2C E-1 100 15 50.00
8 EO 4C E+1 -450 16.1 53.67
9 EO 4C N+1 450 10.7 35.67 µ Tbl = 46,44 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Caroll Pucher 44,81 %
13 EO 4C E = -620 10 33.33
14 EO 2C W+1 -140 30 100.00
15 EO 1S W+1 -120 19 63.33 µ Tbl = 65,56 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia 62,13 %
19 EO 4P E-3 300 2 6.67
20 EO 4C N = 620 14 46.67
21 EO 1S E-4 200 1 3.33 µ Tbl = 18,89 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 47,40 %
22 EO 5K S+1 420 15 50.00
23 EO 1S E = -90 13.9 46.33
24 EO 4P N+2 480 13.9 46.33 µ Tbl = 47,56 %
A.8 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Jeannine Wanderpepen 55,19 %
25 EO 6P W-1 100 2.2 7.33
26 EO 2P E+1 -140 20.3 67.67
27 EO 3P N-1 -50 15 50.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
A.4 Annette Fobe -Myriam de Timary 49,37 %
28 EO 5C W = -450 17.1 57.00
29 EO 4P S+1 650 8.6 28.67
30 EO 2P E-1 50 13.9 46.33 µ Tbl = 44,00 %
Total : 312,7 / 720 = 43,43 %
PAIRE a.1 Jacques Podevyn -Francine Belet
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Caroll Pucher 44,81 %
1 EO 1S E-1 50 26.7 89.00
2 EO 4C W-3 150 0.1 0.33
3 EO 3S S+1 430 4.8 16.00 µ Tbl = 35,11 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia 62,13 %
4 EO 4C W+2 -680 25.7 85.67
5 EO 1S N = 90 10.7 35.67
6 EO 1PcE-2 500 0.1 0.33 µ Tbl = 40,56 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 69,48 %
7 EO 1S S+2 150 8.6 28.67
8 EO 3K E+1 -130 2.2 7.33
9 EO 4C N+2 480 1.1 3.67 µ Tbl = 13,22 %
A.8 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Jeannine Wanderpepen 55,19 %
10 EO 4P S-1 -100 26.7 89.00
11 EO 4C E-3 150 0.1 0.33
12 EO 3S N+1 630 1.1 3.67 µ Tbl = 31,00 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 47,40 %
13 EO 4C E = -620 10 33.33
14 EO 1S S = 90 6 20.00
15 EO 1S W+2 -150 30 100.00 µ Tbl = 51,11 %
A.9 Claire Derieuw -Claire de Quirini 46,48 %
16 EO 4P S+1 450 7.5 25.00
17 EO 3S S = 400 13.9 46.33
18 EO 3S E+1 -430 24.6 82.00 µ Tbl = 51,11 %
A.4 Annette Fobe -Myriam de Timary 49,37 %
19 EO 4P E-2 200 8 26.67
20 EO 4C N = 620 14 46.67
21 EO 1S E-4 200 1 3.33 µ Tbl = 25,56 %
A.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Colette Heerinckx 50,79 %
25 EO 6S E-3 300 0.1 0.33
26 EO 1S W = -90 6.5 21.67
27 EO 2P N+1 140 1.1 3.67 µ Tbl = 8,56 %
Total : 230,6 / 720 = 32,03 %
PAIRE a.8 -
A.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Colette Heerinckx 50,79 %
1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A10 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 46,35 %
4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.6 Andre Delacroix -Muriel de Ceuninck 43,08 %
7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Caroll Pucher 44,81 %
10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 69,48 %
16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.8 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Jeannine Wanderpepen 55,19 %
22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.4 Annette Fobe -Myriam de Timary 49,37 %
25 EO BYE 0 0.00
26 EO BYE 0 0.00
27 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.9 Claire Derieuw -Claire de Quirini 46,48 %
28 EO BYE 0 0.00
29 EO BYE 0 0.00
30 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 900 = 0,00 %
|