B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 60,89 A.6 Paul Henricot -Iris de Limbourg
--- 2 60,42 A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary
--- 3 52,65 A10 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier
--- 4 52,08 A.5 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren
--- 5 51,58 A.8 Michel Lahaut -Philippe van der Gracht
--- 6 51,49 A.2 Denise Testaert -Chantal Woitrin
--- 7 49,82 A12 Nicole Leclere -Brigitte Velge
--- 8 44,64 A.3 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst
--- 9 44,38 A.9 Laurence Mauboussin -Diane Deslignes
--- 10 44,26 A.7 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza
--- 11 44,14 A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Annie Legrand
--- 12 43,24 A11 Annette Fobe -Sophie Tilemans
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 58,63 a.8 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed
--- 2 55,57 a.9 Claire Derieuw -Prisca Tondreau
--- 3 55,09 a.7 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen
--- 4 54,97 a.3 Michel Lievens -Didier Collart
--- 5 54,46 a.4 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert
--- 6 51,49 a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Colette Heerinckx
--- 7 49,61 a.1 Caroll Pucher -Marie J. de Wagheneire
--- 8 49,08 a.5 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens
--- 9 48,69 a11 Pascale Ortegat -Benoit Ortegat
--- 10 46,82 a12 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker
--- 11 45,06 a10 Sylviane Delbeke -Chantal de Lichtervelde
--- 12 30,95 a.2 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck
PAIRE A.6 Paul Henricot -Iris de Limbourg
a10 Sylviane Delbeke -Chantal de Lichtervelde 45,06 %
1 NS 6T N = 920 13 92.86
2 NS 4C E-1 50 12 85.71
3 NS 40%60% Ajust 5.6 40.00 µ Tbl = 72,86 %
a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Colette Heerinckx 51,49 %
16 NS 1S E-1 100 12 85.71
17 NS 3P E-1 50 6 42.86
18 NS 2P S-1 -100 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
a.5 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 49,08 %
19 NS 3T S-2 -100 1 7.14
20 NS 2P E = -110 11 78.57
21 NS 2P S+3 200 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
a.4 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 54,46 %
22 NS 5K S = 400 3 21.43
23 NS 3S E+1 -630 8 57.14
24 NS 2K N = 90 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
a.3 Michel Lievens -Didier Collart 54,97 %
25 NS 3P S = 140 11 78.57
26 NS 4P S = 620 8 57.14
27 NS 3C W-2 100 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 78,57 %
a.2 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 30,95 %
28 NS 1S E+1 -120 4 28.57
29 NS 3P W-1 100 14 100.00
30 NS 3S S = 400 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
a.1 Caroll Pucher -Marie J. de Wagheneire 49,61 %
31 NS 1S W+2 -150 2 14.29
32 NS 3S E+2 -660 13 92.86
33 NS 4PcN-2 -300 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
a11 Pascale Ortegat -Benoit Ortegat 48,69 %
34 NS 3P S = 140 9 64.29
35 NS 3P N = 140 6 42.86
36 NS 4C W+1 -650 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 204,6 / 336 = 60,89 %
PAIRE A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary
a.4 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 54,46 %
10 NS 3S W = -600 8 57.14
11 NS 3S N = 400 12 85.71
12 NS 3P E+1 -170 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.3 Michel Lievens -Didier Collart 54,97 %
13 NS 2C S+1 140 5 35.71
14 NS 2P S = 110 6 42.86
15 NS 4C W-5 250 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
a.2 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 30,95 %
16 NS 1S E-1 100 12 85.71
17 NS 3T N+1 130 13 92.86
18 NS 1S W-1 50 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 80,95 %
a.1 Caroll Pucher -Marie J. de Wagheneire 49,61 %
19 NS 4P S-1 -50 7 50.00
20 NS 2P E-1 100 14 100.00
21 NS 5K W-3 150 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
a12 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 46,82 %
22 NS 3S N = 400 3 21.43
23 NS 3S E+1 -630 8 57.14
24 NS 4K N-2 -100 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
a11 Pascale Ortegat -Benoit Ortegat 48,69 %
25 NS 3P S+1 170 14 100.00
26 NS 4P S = 620 8 57.14
27 NS 4T E-1 50 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 80,95 %
a.9 Claire Derieuw -Prisca Tondreau 55,57 %
28 NS 1S E-2 100 13 92.86
29 NS 1S N-3 -300 4 28.57
30 NS 3S S-1 -50 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
a.8 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 58,63 %
31 NS 1S W+1 -120 10 71.43
32 NS 3S E+3 -690 2 14.29
33 NS 5TcS-2 -300 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
Total : 203,0 / 336 = 60,42 %
PAIRE A10 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier
a.7 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 55,09 %
1 NS 6T N = 920 13 92.86
2 NS 3T E = -110 10 71.43
3 NS 3PcW-2 500 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 87,86 %
a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Colette Heerinckx 51,49 %
4 NS 4C E = -620 4 28.57
5 NS 4C S = 620 11 78.57
6 NS 2P S+1 140 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
a.5 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 49,08 %
7 NS 1S N+2 150 13 92.86
8 NS 3K N-1 -50 4 28.57
9 NS 2P W+1 -140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
a.3 Michel Lievens -Didier Collart 54,97 %
10 NS 3S W+1 -630 2 14.29
11 NS 3S N-1 -50 4 28.57
12 NS 2P E+2 -170 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.2 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 30,95 %
13 NS 2C S+2 170 11 78.57
14 NS 2P S+1 140 10 71.43
15 NS 3T S+2 150 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
a10 Sylviane Delbeke -Chantal de Lichtervelde 45,06 %
28 NS 2S E-1 50 10 71.43
29 NS 1S N-1 -100 12 85.71
30 NS 4P N-2 -100 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
a.9 Claire Derieuw -Prisca Tondreau 55,57 %
31 NS 1S W+1 -120 10 71.43
32 NS 4P W+2 -680 8 57.14
33 NS 4C E = -420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
a.8 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 58,63 %
34 NS 4PcS-2 -500 0 0.00
35 NS 3P N = 140 6 42.86
36 NS 4C W+1 -650 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
Total : 176,9 / 336 = 52,65 %
PAIRE A.5 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren
a.5 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 49,08 %
13 NS 3C S = 140 5 35.71
14 NS 2P S = 110 6 42.86
15 NS 2P S = 110 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
a.4 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 54,46 %
16 NS 1S E = -90 6 42.86
17 NS 3S N-1 -50 3 21.43
18 NS 1S W+1 -120 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
a.3 Michel Lievens -Didier Collart 54,97 %
19 NS 4P S-1 -50 7 50.00
20 NS 2S W+1 -150 4 28.57
21 NS 2K E = -90 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
a.2 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 30,95 %
22 NS 3S N+3 490 10 71.43
23 NS 2T E+3 -150 12 85.71
24 NS 3P W-1 50 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
a.1 Caroll Pucher -Marie J. de Wagheneire 49,61 %
25 NS 3PcS-2 -300 0 0.00
26 NS 4P S = 620 8 57.14
27 NS 4K S-2 -100 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
a12 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 46,82 %
28 NS 3S E-2 100 13 92.86
29 NS 2P W+2 -170 8 57.14
30 NS 3S S = 400 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 78,57 %
a10 Sylviane Delbeke -Chantal de Lichtervelde 45,06 %
31 NS 1S W+1 -120 10 71.43
32 NS 3S E+2 -660 13 92.86
33 NS 3C W+1 -170 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
a.9 Claire Derieuw -Prisca Tondreau 55,57 %
34 NS 3P S+1 170 12 85.71
35 NS 3P N = 140 6 42.86
36 NS 4C W+1 -650 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
Total : 175,0 / 336 = 52,08 %
PAIRE A.8 Michel Lahaut -Philippe van der Gracht
a.3 Michel Lievens -Didier Collart 54,97 %
1 NS 3S S+2 460 5 35.71
2 NS 3C E = -140 7 50.00
3 NS 4T N+1 150 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 50,71 %
a.1 Caroll Pucher -Marie J. de Wagheneire 49,61 %
4 NS 4PcN-1 -200 10 71.43
5 NS 4C N-1 -100 3 21.43
6 NS 2P S = 110 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
a12 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 46,82 %
7 NS 1S N+1 120 7 50.00
8 NS 2K N+2 130 12 85.71
9 NS 4K S = 130 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 78,57 %
a.8 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 58,63 %
22 NS 3S N+4 520 13 92.86
23 NS 3S W+2 -660 2 14.29
24 NS 3K N-1 -50 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.7 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 55,09 %
25 NS 3P S-1 -50 4 28.57
26 NS 3S N+2 660 14 100.00
27 NS 5T E = -400 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Colette Heerinckx 51,49 %
28 NS 1S E+2 -150 1 7.14
29 NS 1S N-2 -200 6 42.86
30 NS 3S S = 400 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
a.5 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 49,08 %
31 NS 1S W+1 -120 10 71.43
32 NS 3S E+3 -690 2 14.29
33 NS 3P N-1 -50 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
a.4 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 54,46 %
34 NS 1S N = 90 4 28.57
35 NS 5C E-2 200 14 100.00
36 NS 4C W+2 -680 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
Total : 173,3 / 336 = 51,58 %
PAIRE A.2 Denise Testaert -Chantal Woitrin
a.2 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 30,95 %
4 NS 4C E-2 200 14 100.00
5 NS 4C N-1 -100 3 21.43
6 NS 2P S-1 -50 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
a.1 Caroll Pucher -Marie J. de Wagheneire 49,61 %
7 NS 1S N = 90 1 7.14
8 NS 2K N+2 130 12 85.71
9 NS 2P W-1 100 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
a12 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 46,82 %
10 NS 3S W = -600 8 57.14
11 NS 3S N = 400 12 85.71
12 NS 4P E = -420 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
a11 Pascale Ortegat -Benoit Ortegat 48,69 %
13 NS 3C S+1 170 11 78.57
14 NS 4K W-3 150 13 92.86
15 NS 4P S-1 -100 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
a10 Sylviane Delbeke -Chantal de Lichtervelde 45,06 %
16 NS 1S E+1 -120 2 14.29
17 NS 3K S = 110 10 71.43
18 NS 1S W-1 50 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.9 Claire Derieuw -Prisca Tondreau 55,57 %
19 NS 4P S-1 -50 7 50.00
20 NS 2P E+1 -140 6 42.86
21 NS 3P S+1 170 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
a.7 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 55,09 %
22 NS 4P S = 420 8 57.14
23 NS 3S W+2 -660 2 14.29
24 NS 3K N-1 -50 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Colette Heerinckx 51,49 %
25 NS 3P S-1 -50 4 28.57
26 NS 3S N+1 630 12 85.71
27 NS 4T W+1 -150 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
Total : 173,0 / 336 = 51,49 %
PAIRE A12 Nicole Leclere -Brigitte Velge
a11 Pascale Ortegat -Benoit Ortegat 48,69 %
1 NS 3S S+2 460 5 35.71
2 NS 3C E = -140 7 50.00
3 NS 3T S = 110 2.4 17.14 µ Tbl = 34,29 %
a10 Sylviane Delbeke -Chantal de Lichtervelde 45,06 %
4 NS 4C E-1 100 12 85.71
5 NS 4C N-1 -100 3 21.43
6 NS 2P S+1 140 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
a.9 Claire Derieuw -Prisca Tondreau 55,57 %
7 NS 1S N = 90 1 7.14
8 NS 5K N-1 -50 4 28.57
9 NS 3P W-1 100 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
a.8 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 58,63 %
10 NS 3S W = -600 8 57.14
11 NS 3S N-1 -50 4 28.57
12 NS 4P E = -420 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.7 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 55,09 %
13 NS 4C S-2 -200 0 0.00
14 NS 2P S = 110 6 42.86
15 NS 3P S = 140 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.5 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 49,08 %
16 NS 1S E-1 100 12 85.71
17 NS 2T N+2 130 13 92.86
18 NS 1S W-2 100 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 92,86 %
a.4 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 54,46 %
19 NS 3T S-2 -100 1 7.14
20 NS 2P E = -110 11 78.57
21 NS 3P S = 140 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
a12 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 46,82 %
34 NS 3S N = 600 14 100.00
35 NS 3P N = 140 6 42.86
36 NS 4C W+1 -650 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
Total : 167,4 / 336 = 49,82 %
PAIRE A.3 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst
a.3 Michel Lievens -Didier Collart 54,97 %
7 NS 1S N+1 120 7 50.00
8 NS 3K N-2 -100 0 0.00
9 NS 2C N-2 -100 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
a.2 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 30,95 %
10 NS 3K E+1 -130 14 100.00
11 NS 3S N-1 -50 4 28.57
12 NS 4P E-1 50 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
a.1 Caroll Pucher -Marie J. de Wagheneire 49,61 %
13 NS 4C S-1 -100 2 14.29
14 NS 3K W-3 150 13 92.86
15 NS 2S S+1 150 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
a12 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 46,82 %
16 NS 1S E = -90 6 42.86
17 NS 2P E = -110 0 0.00
18 NS 2T S = 90 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
a11 Pascale Ortegat -Benoit Ortegat 48,69 %
19 NS 2S N+1 150 12 85.71
20 NS 1S W+3 -180 2 14.29
21 NS 3C E-2 100 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
a10 Sylviane Delbeke -Chantal de Lichtervelde 45,06 %
22 NS 3S S = 400 3 21.43
23 NS 3S W+1 -630 8 57.14
24 NS 3K N-1 -50 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
a.8 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 58,63 %
25 NS 3P S = 140 11 78.57
26 NS 3S N-2 -200 0 0.00
27 NS 4T E = -130 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
a.7 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 55,09 %
28 NS 1S E = -90 7 50.00
29 NS 1S N-4 -400 1 7.14
30 NS 4P N-2 -100 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 21,43 %
Total : 150,0 / 336 = 44,64 %
PAIRE A.9 Laurence Mauboussin -Diane Deslignes
a.5 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 49,08 %
1 NS 3S S+3 490 10 71.43
2 NS 4C E = -420 2 14.29
3 NS 3P W-1 100 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 28,81 %
a.4 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 54,46 %
4 NS 4C E = -620 4 28.57
5 NS 4C S-1 -100 3 21.43
6 NS 2P S+2 170 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
a.2 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 30,95 %
7 NS 1S N+2 150 13 92.86
8 NS 2K N = 90 8 57.14
9 NS 3T E = -110 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
a.1 Caroll Pucher -Marie J. de Wagheneire 49,61 %
10 NS 3S W+2 -660 0 0.00
11 NS 3S N-1 -50 4 28.57
12 NS 4P E-1 50 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
a.9 Claire Derieuw -Prisca Tondreau 55,57 %
25 NS 3P N-1 -50 4 28.57
26 NS 4P N-1 -100 3 21.43
27 NS 3T W = -110 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
a.8 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 58,63 %
28 NS 1S E+2 -150 1 7.14
29 NS 2P W+1 -140 10 71.43
30 NS 3S S-1 -50 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
a.7 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 55,09 %
31 NS 1S W+1 -120 10 71.43
32 NS 3S E+3 -690 2 14.29
33 NS 3P N-1 -50 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Colette Heerinckx 51,49 %
34 NS 4T N-2 -200 2 14.29
35 NS 3P N = 140 6 42.86
36 NS 4C W = -620 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
Total : 149,1 / 336 = 44,38 %
PAIRE A.7 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza
a12 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 46,82 %
1 NS 3S S+1 430 0 0.00
2 NS 2PcS+1 870 14 100.00
3 NS 3K N+1 130 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 44,52 %
a11 Pascale Ortegat -Benoit Ortegat 48,69 %
4 NS 4C E = -620 4 28.57
5 NS 4C N = 620 11 78.57
6 NS 5T E-1 100 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
a.7 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 55,09 %
19 NS 3P S+1 170 14 100.00
20 NS 2T N-3 -300 0 0.00
21 NS 3P S-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Colette Heerinckx 51,49 %
22 NS 3S N = 400 3 21.43
23 NS 3S W+2 -660 2 14.29
24 NS 2K N = 90 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
a.5 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 49,08 %
25 NS 2P S = 110 8 57.14
26 NS 4P S-1 -100 3 21.43
27 NS 5T E = -400 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
a.4 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 54,46 %
28 NS 1S E = -90 7 50.00
29 NS 1S N-4 -400 1 7.14
30 NS 4P S-1 -50 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.3 Michel Lievens -Didier Collart 54,97 %
31 NS 1S W+2 -150 2 14.29
32 NS 4P W+2 -680 8 57.14
33 NS 3C W-1 50 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
a.2 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 30,95 %
34 NS 2P S+1 140 9 64.29
35 NS 3P N = 140 6 42.86
36 NS 3C W+2 -200 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
Total : 148,7 / 336 = 44,26 %
PAIRE A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Annie Legrand
a.1 Caroll Pucher -Marie J. de Wagheneire 49,61 %
1 NS 3S S+2 460 5 35.71
2 NS 4C E = -420 2 14.29
3 NS 3K N+2 150 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 38,81 %
a12 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 46,82 %
4 NS 4C E = -620 4 28.57
5 NS 4C N = 620 11 78.57
6 NS 3T E = -110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
a11 Pascale Ortegat -Benoit Ortegat 48,69 %
7 NS 1S N+1 120 7 50.00
8 NS 3K N+1 130 12 85.71
9 NS 4T E = -130 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a10 Sylviane Delbeke -Chantal de Lichtervelde 45,06 %
10 NS 3S W = -600 8 57.14
11 NS 3S N = 400 12 85.71
12 NS 4P E = -420 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
a.9 Claire Derieuw -Prisca Tondreau 55,57 %
13 NS 2C S+2 170 11 78.57
14 NS 3S W-2 100 1 7.14
15 NS 4PcS-1 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
a.8 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 58,63 %
16 NS 1S E = -90 6 42.86
17 NS 2C S-1 -50 3 21.43
18 NS 1S W = -90 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Colette Heerinckx 51,49 %
19 NS 4P S-1 -50 7 50.00
20 NS 1S W+1 -120 8 57.14
21 NS 3C E-2 100 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
a.5 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 49,08 %
22 NS 3S S+4 520 13 92.86
23 NS 6KcW-1 200 14 100.00
24 NS 4P W = -420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
Total : 148,3 / 336 = 44,14 %
PAIRE A11 Annette Fobe -Sophie Tilemans
a.9 Claire Derieuw -Prisca Tondreau 55,57 %
1 NS 3S S+2 460 5 35.71
2 NS 4C E = -420 2 14.29
3 NS 2S N+1 150 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 38,81 %
a.8 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 58,63 %
4 NS 4C E = -620 4 28.57
5 NS 4C N = 620 11 78.57
6 NS 2P S+2 170 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.7 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 55,09 %
7 NS 1S N+1 120 7 50.00
8 NS 3C N-1 -50 4 28.57
9 NS 2S S-1 -50 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Colette Heerinckx 51,49 %
10 NS 3S W = -600 8 57.14
11 NS 3S N-1 -50 4 28.57
12 NS 3P E+1 -170 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
a.4 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 54,46 %
13 NS 2P S+2 170 11 78.57
14 NS 3K W-2 100 1 7.14
15 NS 2T N+2 130 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
a.3 Michel Lievens -Didier Collart 54,97 %
16 NS 1S E+2 -150 0 0.00
17 NS 2C W-2 100 8 57.14
18 NS 2C S-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 19,05 %
a11 Pascale Ortegat -Benoit Ortegat 48,69 %
31 NS 1S W+2 -150 2 14.29
32 NS 4P W+2 -680 8 57.14
33 NS 3C W = -140 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
a10 Sylviane Delbeke -Chantal de Lichtervelde 45,06 %
34 NS 2P S = 110 6 42.86
35 NS 3P N = 140 6 42.86
36 NS 4C W+1 -650 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
Total : 145,3 / 336 = 43,24 %
PAIRE a.8 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed
A11 Annette Fobe -Sophie Tilemans 43,24 %
4 EO 4C E = -620 10 71.43
5 EO 4C N = 620 3 21.43
6 EO 2P S+2 170 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A12 Nicole Leclere -Brigitte Velge 49,82 %
10 EO 3S W = -600 6 42.86
11 EO 3S N-1 -50 10 71.43
12 EO 4P E = -420 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Annie Legrand 44,14 %
16 EO 1S E = -90 8 57.14
17 EO 2C S-1 -50 11 78.57
18 EO 1S W = -90 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
A.8 Michel Lahaut -Philippe van der Gracht 51,58 %
22 EO 3S N+4 520 1 7.14
23 EO 3S W+2 -660 12 85.71
24 EO 3K N-1 -50 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.3 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 44,64 %
25 EO 3P S = 140 3 21.43
26 EO 3S N-2 -200 14 100.00
27 EO 4T E = -130 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
A.9 Laurence Mauboussin -Diane Deslignes 44,38 %
28 EO 1S E+2 -150 13 92.86
29 EO 2P W+1 -140 4 28.57
30 EO 3S S-1 -50 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary 60,42 %
31 EO 1S W+1 -120 4 28.57
32 EO 3S E+3 -690 12 85.71
33 EO 5TcS-2 -300 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
A10 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 52,65 %
34 EO 4PcS-2 -500 14 100.00
35 EO 3P N = 140 8 57.14
36 EO 4C W+1 -650 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
Total : 197,0 / 336 = 58,63 %
PAIRE a.9 Claire Derieuw -Prisca Tondreau
A11 Annette Fobe -Sophie Tilemans 43,24 %
1 EO 3S S+2 460 9 64.29
2 EO 4C E = -420 12 85.71
3 EO 2S N+1 150 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 61,19 %
A12 Nicole Leclere -Brigitte Velge 49,82 %
7 EO 1S N = 90 13 92.86
8 EO 5K N-1 -50 10 71.43
9 EO 3P W-1 100 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Annie Legrand 44,14 %
13 EO 2C S+2 170 3 21.43
14 EO 3S W-2 100 13 92.86
15 EO 4PcS-1 -200 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
A.2 Denise Testaert -Chantal Woitrin 51,49 %
19 EO 4P S-1 -50 7 50.00
20 EO 2P E+1 -140 8 57.14
21 EO 3P S+1 170 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
A.9 Laurence Mauboussin -Diane Deslignes 44,38 %
25 EO 3P N-1 -50 10 71.43
26 EO 4P N-1 -100 11 78.57
27 EO 3T W = -110 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary 60,42 %
28 EO 1S E-2 100 1 7.14
29 EO 1S N-3 -300 10 71.43
30 EO 3S S-1 -50 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
A10 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 52,65 %
31 EO 1S W+1 -120 4 28.57
32 EO 4P W+2 -680 6 42.86
33 EO 4C E = -420 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
A.5 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 52,08 %
34 EO 3P S+1 170 2 14.29
35 EO 3P N = 140 8 57.14
36 EO 4C W+1 -650 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
Total : 186,7 / 336 = 55,57 %
PAIRE a.7 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen
A10 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 52,65 %
1 EO 6T N = 920 1 7.14
2 EO 3T E = -110 4 28.57
3 EO 3PcW-2 500 0.1 0.71 µ Tbl = 12,14 %
A11 Annette Fobe -Sophie Tilemans 43,24 %
7 EO 1S N+1 120 7 50.00
8 EO 3C N-1 -50 10 71.43
9 EO 2S S-1 -50 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
A12 Nicole Leclere -Brigitte Velge 49,82 %
13 EO 4C S-2 -200 14 100.00
14 EO 2P S = 110 8 57.14
15 EO 3P S = 140 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.7 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 44,26 %
19 EO 3P S+1 170 0 0.00
20 EO 2T N-3 -300 14 100.00
21 EO 3P S-1 -100 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.2 Denise Testaert -Chantal Woitrin 51,49 %
22 EO 4P S = 420 6 42.86
23 EO 3S W+2 -660 12 85.71
24 EO 3K N-1 -50 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
A.8 Michel Lahaut -Philippe van der Gracht 51,58 %
25 EO 3P S-1 -50 10 71.43
26 EO 3S N+2 660 0 0.00
27 EO 5T E = -400 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
A.3 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 44,64 %
28 EO 1S E = -90 7 50.00
29 EO 1S N-4 -400 13 92.86
30 EO 4P N-2 -100 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 78,57 %
A.9 Laurence Mauboussin -Diane Deslignes 44,38 %
31 EO 1S W+1 -120 4 28.57
32 EO 3S E+3 -690 12 85.71
33 EO 3P N-1 -50 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
Total : 185,1 / 336 = 55,09 %
PAIRE a.3 Michel Lievens -Didier Collart
A.8 Michel Lahaut -Philippe van der Gracht 51,58 %
1 EO 3S S+2 460 9 64.29
2 EO 3C E = -140 7 50.00
3 EO 4T N+1 150 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 49,29 %
A.3 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 44,64 %
7 EO 1S N+1 120 7 50.00
8 EO 3K N-2 -100 14 100.00
9 EO 2C N-2 -100 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
A10 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 52,65 %
10 EO 3S W+1 -630 12 85.71
11 EO 3S N-1 -50 10 71.43
12 EO 2P E+2 -170 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary 60,42 %
13 EO 2C S+1 140 9 64.29
14 EO 2P S = 110 8 57.14
15 EO 4C W-5 250 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
A11 Annette Fobe -Sophie Tilemans 43,24 %
16 EO 1S E+2 -150 14 100.00
17 EO 2C W-2 100 6 42.86
18 EO 2C S-2 -200 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 80,95 %
A.5 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 52,08 %
19 EO 4P S-1 -50 7 50.00
20 EO 2S W+1 -150 10 71.43
21 EO 2K E = -90 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
A.6 Paul Henricot -Iris de Limbourg 60,89 %
25 EO 3P S = 140 3 21.43
26 EO 4P S = 620 6 42.86
27 EO 3C W-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 21,43 %
A.7 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 44,26 %
31 EO 1S W+2 -150 12 85.71
32 EO 4P W+2 -680 6 42.86
33 EO 3C W-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
Total : 184,7 / 336 = 54,97 %
PAIRE a.4 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert
A.9 Laurence Mauboussin -Diane Deslignes 44,38 %
4 EO 4C E = -620 10 71.43
5 EO 4C S-1 -100 11 78.57
6 EO 2P S+2 170 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary 60,42 %
10 EO 3S W = -600 6 42.86
11 EO 3S N = 400 2 14.29
12 EO 3P E+1 -170 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A11 Annette Fobe -Sophie Tilemans 43,24 %
13 EO 2P S+2 170 3 21.43
14 EO 3K W-2 100 13 92.86
15 EO 2T N+2 130 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
A.5 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 52,08 %
16 EO 1S E = -90 8 57.14
17 EO 3S N-1 -50 11 78.57
18 EO 1S W+1 -120 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
A12 Nicole Leclere -Brigitte Velge 49,82 %
19 EO 3T S-2 -100 13 92.86
20 EO 2P E = -110 3 21.43
21 EO 3P S = 140 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
A.6 Paul Henricot -Iris de Limbourg 60,89 %
22 EO 5K S = 400 11 78.57
23 EO 3S E+1 -630 6 42.86
24 EO 2K N = 90 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
A.7 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 44,26 %
28 EO 1S E = -90 7 50.00
29 EO 1S N-4 -400 13 92.86
30 EO 4P S-1 -50 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.8 Michel Lahaut -Philippe van der Gracht 51,58 %
34 EO 1S N = 90 10 71.43
35 EO 5C E-2 200 0 0.00
36 EO 4C W+2 -680 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
Total : 183,0 / 336 = 54,46 %
PAIRE a.6 Catherine de Moffarts -Colette Heerinckx
A10 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 52,65 %
4 EO 4C E = -620 10 71.43
5 EO 4C S = 620 3 21.43
6 EO 2P S+1 140 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
A11 Annette Fobe -Sophie Tilemans 43,24 %
10 EO 3S W = -600 6 42.86
11 EO 3S N-1 -50 10 71.43
12 EO 3P E+1 -170 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
A.6 Paul Henricot -Iris de Limbourg 60,89 %
16 EO 1S E-1 100 2 14.29
17 EO 3P E-1 50 8 57.14
18 EO 2P S-1 -100 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Annie Legrand 44,14 %
19 EO 4P S-1 -50 7 50.00
20 EO 1S W+1 -120 6 42.86
21 EO 3C E-2 100 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
A.7 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 44,26 %
22 EO 3S N = 400 11 78.57
23 EO 3S W+2 -660 12 85.71
24 EO 2K N = 90 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
A.2 Denise Testaert -Chantal Woitrin 51,49 %
25 EO 3P S-1 -50 10 71.43
26 EO 3S N+1 630 2 14.29
27 EO 4T W+1 -150 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
A.8 Michel Lahaut -Philippe van der Gracht 51,58 %
28 EO 1S E+2 -150 13 92.86
29 EO 1S N-2 -200 8 57.14
30 EO 3S S = 400 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
A.9 Laurence Mauboussin -Diane Deslignes 44,38 %
34 EO 4T N-2 -200 12 85.71
35 EO 3P N = 140 8 57.14
36 EO 4C W = -620 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
Total : 173,0 / 336 = 51,49 %
PAIRE a.1 Caroll Pucher -Marie J. de Wagheneire
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Annie Legrand 44,14 %
1 EO 3S S+2 460 9 64.29
2 EO 4C E = -420 12 85.71
3 EO 3K N+2 150 4.7 33.57 µ Tbl = 61,19 %
A.8 Michel Lahaut -Philippe van der Gracht 51,58 %
4 EO 4PcN-1 -200 4 28.57
5 EO 4C N-1 -100 11 78.57
6 EO 2P S = 110 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
A.2 Denise Testaert -Chantal Woitrin 51,49 %
7 EO 1S N = 90 13 92.86
8 EO 2K N+2 130 2 14.29
9 EO 2P W-1 100 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
A.9 Laurence Mauboussin -Diane Deslignes 44,38 %
10 EO 3S W+2 -660 14 100.00
11 EO 3S N-1 -50 10 71.43
12 EO 4P E-1 50 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
A.3 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 44,64 %
13 EO 4C S-1 -100 12 85.71
14 EO 3K W-3 150 1 7.14
15 EO 2S S+1 150 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary 60,42 %
19 EO 4P S-1 -50 7 50.00
20 EO 2P E-1 100 0 0.00
21 EO 5K W-3 150 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
A.5 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 52,08 %
25 EO 3PcS-2 -300 14 100.00
26 EO 4P S = 620 6 42.86
27 EO 4K S-2 -100 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
A.6 Paul Henricot -Iris de Limbourg 60,89 %
31 EO 1S W+2 -150 12 85.71
32 EO 3S E+2 -660 1 7.14
33 EO 4PcN-2 -300 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
Total : 166,7 / 336 = 49,61 %
PAIRE a.5 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens
A.9 Laurence Mauboussin -Diane Deslignes 44,38 %
1 EO 3S S+3 490 4 28.57
2 EO 4C E = -420 12 85.71
3 EO 3P W-1 100 13.9 99.29 µ Tbl = 71,19 %
A10 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 52,65 %
7 EO 1S N+2 150 1 7.14
8 EO 3K N-1 -50 10 71.43
9 EO 2P W+1 -140 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
A.5 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 52,08 %
13 EO 3C S = 140 9 64.29
14 EO 2P S = 110 8 57.14
15 EO 2P S = 110 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
A12 Nicole Leclere -Brigitte Velge 49,82 %
16 EO 1S E-1 100 2 14.29
17 EO 2T N+2 130 1 7.14
18 EO 1S W-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 7,14 %
A.6 Paul Henricot -Iris de Limbourg 60,89 %
19 EO 3T S-2 -100 13 92.86
20 EO 2P E = -110 3 21.43
21 EO 2P S+3 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Annie Legrand 44,14 %
22 EO 3S S+4 520 1 7.14
23 EO 6KcW-1 200 0 0.00
24 EO 4P W = -420 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
A.7 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 44,26 %
25 EO 2P S = 110 6 42.86
26 EO 4P S-1 -100 11 78.57
27 EO 5T E = -400 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
A.8 Michel Lahaut -Philippe van der Gracht 51,58 %
31 EO 1S W+1 -120 4 28.57
32 EO 3S E+3 -690 12 85.71
33 EO 3P N-1 -50 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
Total : 164,9 / 336 = 49,08 %
PAIRE a11 Pascale Ortegat -Benoit Ortegat
A12 Nicole Leclere -Brigitte Velge 49,82 %
1 EO 3S S+2 460 9 64.29
2 EO 3C E = -140 7 50.00
3 EO 3T S = 110 11.6 82.86 µ Tbl = 65,71 %
A.7 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 44,26 %
4 EO 4C E = -620 10 71.43
5 EO 4C N = 620 3 21.43
6 EO 5T E-1 100 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Annie Legrand 44,14 %
7 EO 1S N+1 120 7 50.00
8 EO 3K N+1 130 2 14.29
9 EO 4T E = -130 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.2 Denise Testaert -Chantal Woitrin 51,49 %
13 EO 3C S+1 170 3 21.43
14 EO 4K W-3 150 1 7.14
15 EO 4P S-1 -100 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
A.3 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 44,64 %
19 EO 2S N+1 150 2 14.29
20 EO 1S W+3 -180 12 85.71
21 EO 3C E-2 100 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary 60,42 %
25 EO 3P S+1 170 0 0.00
26 EO 4P S = 620 6 42.86
27 EO 4T E-1 50 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 19,05 %
A11 Annette Fobe -Sophie Tilemans 43,24 %
31 EO 1S W+2 -150 12 85.71
32 EO 4P W+2 -680 6 42.86
33 EO 3C W = -140 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
A.6 Paul Henricot -Iris de Limbourg 60,89 %
34 EO 3P S = 140 5 35.71
35 EO 3P N = 140 8 57.14
36 EO 4C W+1 -650 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 163,6 / 336 = 48,69 %
PAIRE a12 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker
A.7 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 44,26 %
1 EO 3S S+1 430 14 100.00
2 EO 2PcS+1 870 0 0.00
3 EO 3K N+1 130 9.3 66.43 µ Tbl = 55,48 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Annie Legrand 44,14 %
4 EO 4C E = -620 10 71.43
5 EO 4C N = 620 3 21.43
6 EO 3T E = -110 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
A.8 Michel Lahaut -Philippe van der Gracht 51,58 %
7 EO 1S N+1 120 7 50.00
8 EO 2K N+2 130 2 14.29
9 EO 4K S = 130 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 21,43 %
A.2 Denise Testaert -Chantal Woitrin 51,49 %
10 EO 3S W = -600 6 42.86
11 EO 3S N = 400 2 14.29
12 EO 4P E = -420 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A.3 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 44,64 %
16 EO 1S E = -90 8 57.14
17 EO 2P E = -110 14 100.00
18 EO 2T S = 90 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary 60,42 %
22 EO 3S N = 400 11 78.57
23 EO 3S E+1 -630 6 42.86
24 EO 4K N-2 -100 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
A.5 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 52,08 %
28 EO 3S E-2 100 1 7.14
29 EO 2P W+2 -170 6 42.86
30 EO 3S S = 400 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 21,43 %
A12 Nicole Leclere -Brigitte Velge 49,82 %
34 EO 3S N = 600 0 0.00
35 EO 3P N = 140 8 57.14
36 EO 4C W+1 -650 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
Total : 157,3 / 336 = 46,82 %
PAIRE a10 Sylviane Delbeke -Chantal de Lichtervelde
A.6 Paul Henricot -Iris de Limbourg 60,89 %
1 EO 6T N = 920 1 7.14
2 EO 4C E-1 50 2 14.29
3 EO 40%60% Ajust 8.4 60.00 µ Tbl = 27,14 %
A12 Nicole Leclere -Brigitte Velge 49,82 %
4 EO 4C E-1 100 2 14.29
5 EO 4C N-1 -100 11 78.57
6 EO 2P S+1 140 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Annie Legrand 44,14 %
10 EO 3S W = -600 6 42.86
11 EO 3S N = 400 2 14.29
12 EO 4P E = -420 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A.2 Denise Testaert -Chantal Woitrin 51,49 %
16 EO 1S E+1 -120 12 85.71
17 EO 3K S = 110 4 28.57
18 EO 1S W-1 50 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.3 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 44,64 %
22 EO 3S S = 400 11 78.57
23 EO 3S W+1 -630 6 42.86
24 EO 3K N-1 -50 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
A10 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 52,65 %
28 EO 2S E-1 50 4 28.57
29 EO 1S N-1 -100 2 14.29
30 EO 4P N-2 -100 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
A.5 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 52,08 %
31 EO 1S W+1 -120 4 28.57
32 EO 3S E+2 -660 1 7.14
33 EO 3C W+1 -170 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
A11 Annette Fobe -Sophie Tilemans 43,24 %
34 EO 2P S = 110 8 57.14
35 EO 3P N = 140 8 57.14
36 EO 4C W+1 -650 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
Total : 151,4 / 336 = 45,06 %
PAIRE a.2 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck
A.2 Denise Testaert -Chantal Woitrin 51,49 %
4 EO 4C E-2 200 0 0.00
5 EO 4C N-1 -100 11 78.57
6 EO 2P S-1 -50 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
A.9 Laurence Mauboussin -Diane Deslignes 44,38 %
7 EO 1S N+2 150 1 7.14
8 EO 2K N = 90 6 42.86
9 EO 3T E = -110 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
A.3 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 44,64 %
10 EO 3K E+1 -130 0 0.00
11 EO 3S N-1 -50 10 71.43
12 EO 4P E-1 50 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
A10 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 52,65 %
13 EO 2C S+2 170 3 21.43
14 EO 2P S+1 140 4 28.57
15 EO 3T S+2 150 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary 60,42 %
16 EO 1S E-1 100 2 14.29
17 EO 3T N+1 130 1 7.14
18 EO 1S W-1 50 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 19,05 %
A.5 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 52,08 %
22 EO 3S N+3 490 4 28.57
23 EO 2T E+3 -150 2 14.29
24 EO 3P W-1 50 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
A.6 Paul Henricot -Iris de Limbourg 60,89 %
28 EO 1S E+1 -120 10 71.43
29 EO 3P W-1 100 0 0.00
30 EO 3S S = 400 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
A.7 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 44,26 %
34 EO 2P S+1 140 5 35.71
35 EO 3P N = 140 8 57.14
36 EO 3C W+2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
Total : 104,0 / 336 = 30,95 %
|