B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 59,52 A13 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels
--- 2 55,68 A.9 Pascale Ortegat -Jean de Villenfagne
--- 3 55,52 A.8 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander
--- 4 54,59 A.4 Stan Tabor -Alan Beckman
--- 5 52,98 A12 Liliane Baptista -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
--- 6 52,85 A.7 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes
--- 7 50,39 A10 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger
--- 8 49,26 A.5 Serge Alard -Jean Chabotier
--- 9 47,95 A.3 Nicole Leclere -Madeleine Gabriel
--- 10 44,86 A.1 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse
--- 11 44,48 A.6 Ines Drory -Simone Munsterhjelm
--- 12 44,17 A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Lydia Wildiers
--- 13 38,04 A11 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 60,55 a.2 Francoise Duren -Gaetan van de Werve
--- 2 59,68 a.9 Patrick Gilles -Noelle Fosse
--- 3 56,52 a11 Nicolas de Neve -Chantal de Lichtervelde
--- 4 55,32 a13 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru
--- 5 54,85 a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger
--- 6 51,95 a.8 Helene Schyns -Fabienne Smit
--- 7 51,44 a.5 Dominique Sassen -Danielle Wybauw
--- 8 49,64 a.7 Michel Lievens -Teresa Dekoster
--- 9 45,34 a.1 Catherine de Moffarts -Anne Arsac
--- 10 41,89 a10 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot
--- 11 41,46 a.6 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens
--- 12 31,27 a12 Diane de Meeus -Anne France Raquez
--- 13 0,00 a.4 -
PAIRE A13 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels
a12 Diane de Meeus -Anne France Raquez 31,27 %
1 NS 4P S = 420 20.8 94.55
2 NS 3T W-1 50 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
a11 Nicolas de Neve -Chantal de Lichtervelde 56,52 %
3 NS 2C S = 110 15 68.18
4 NS 3K S = 110 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a10 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 41,89 %
5 NS 1S N-2 -200 8.8 40.00
6 NS 3S E-1 100 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a.9 Patrick Gilles -Noelle Fosse 59,68 %
7 NS 3P S-2 -200 3.4 15.45
8 NS 2S N = 120 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a.8 Helene Schyns -Fabienne Smit 51,95 %
9 NS 4P E = -620 11 50.00
10 NS 3S S+1 630 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.7 Michel Lievens -Teresa Dekoster 49,64 %
11 NS 4P W+3 -510 11 50.00
12 NS 4P N+1 650 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a.6 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 41,46 %
13 NS 1P N+3 170 21.9 99.55
14 NS 3S S+1 430 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 94,55 %
a.5 Dominique Sassen -Danielle Wybauw 51,44 %
15 NS 2K E+3 -150 14.3 65.00
16 NS 2C N-2 -100 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.4 - 0,00 %
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 54,85 %
19 NS 2C W+1 -140 2.3 10.45
20 NS 1S N+2 150 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Gaetan van de Werve 60,55 %
21 NS 1S W = -90 5.5 25.00
22 NS 3P N = 140 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 32,50 %
a13 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 55,32 %
25 NS 3S S+2 460 18.6 84.55
26 NS 1S S-1 -100 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
Total : 288,1 / 484 = 59,52 %
PAIRE A.9 Pascale Ortegat -Jean de Villenfagne
a.4 - 0,00 %
1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 54,85 %
3 NS 2C S-1 -50 8 36.36
4 NS 2P N+1 140 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Gaetan van de Werve 60,55 %
5 NS 3T N = 110 21.9 99.55
6 NS 4P W = -620 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.1 Catherine de Moffarts -Anne Arsac 45,34 %
7 NS 3C W+1 -170 11 50.00
8 NS 3P S = 140 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a13 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 55,32 %
9 NS 4P W = -620 11 50.00
10 NS 4C S = 620 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a12 Diane de Meeus -Anne France Raquez 31,27 %
11 NS 4P W+3 -510 11 50.00
12 NS 4C W-2 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a11 Nicolas de Neve -Chantal de Lichtervelde 56,52 %
13 NS 3P N = 140 17.5 79.55
14 NS 3S S-1 -50 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a.9 Patrick Gilles -Noelle Fosse 59,68 %
17 NS 1S S-1 -50 1.2 5.45
18 NS 3S W-1 50 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.8 Helene Schyns -Fabienne Smit 51,95 %
19 NS 4CcE-2 500 21.9 99.55
20 NS 2P E = -110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a.7 Michel Lievens -Teresa Dekoster 49,64 %
21 NS 1S W = -90 5.5 25.00
22 NS 2P S+1 140 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 32,50 %
a.6 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 41,46 %
23 NS 2P N+1 140 15.4 70.00
24 NS 2C N+1 140 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
a.5 Dominique Sassen -Danielle Wybauw 51,44 %
25 NS 3S S+1 430 9.9 45.00
26 NS 1S W = -90 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
Total : 269,5 / 484 = 55,68 %
PAIRE A.8 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander
a.2 Francoise Duren -Gaetan van de Werve 60,55 %
1 NS 4P S-1 -50 4.5 20.45
2 NS 3T W = -110 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
a.1 Catherine de Moffarts -Anne Arsac 45,34 %
3 NS 2C S-1 -50 8 36.36
4 NS 2C E-3 300 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a13 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 55,32 %
5 NS 3S W = -400 1.2 5.45
6 NS 4K S-3 -150 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a12 Diane de Meeus -Anne France Raquez 31,27 %
7 NS 2P S = 110 21.9 99.55
8 NS 2S N+2 180 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 99,55 %
a11 Nicolas de Neve -Chantal de Lichtervelde 56,52 %
9 NS 4P W = -620 11 50.00
10 NS 3S S+3 690 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a10 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 41,89 %
11 NS 5P W+1 -480 19.7 89.55
12 NS 3C W = -140 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.8 Helene Schyns -Fabienne Smit 51,95 %
15 NS 2K E+3 -150 14.3 65.00
16 NS 2C N-2 -100 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.7 Michel Lievens -Teresa Dekoster 49,64 %
17 NS 1S S-1 -50 1.2 5.45
18 NS 3S W+1 -430 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.6 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 41,46 %
19 NS 2P E-1 100 15.4 70.00
20 NS 2K N-1 -100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
a.5 Dominique Sassen -Danielle Wybauw 51,44 %
21 NS 1P E-2 100 20.8 94.55
22 NS 2P S+1 140 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a.4 - 0,00 %
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 54,85 %
25 NS 3S S+2 460 18.6 84.55
26 NS 1S W+1 -120 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
Total : 268,7 / 484 = 55,52 %
PAIRE A.4 Stan Tabor -Alan Beckman
a.7 Michel Lievens -Teresa Dekoster 49,64 %
1 NS 2C N+1 140 15.4 70.00
2 NS 4T W-1 50 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
a.6 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 41,46 %
3 NS 2C S+1 140 21 95.45
4 NS 2P N+1 140 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.4 - 0,00 %
7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 54,85 %
9 NS 4P W = -620 11 50.00
10 NS 2C N+2 170 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Gaetan van de Werve 60,55 %
11 NS 4P W+3 -510 11 50.00
12 NS 3P N+2 200 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a.1 Catherine de Moffarts -Anne Arsac 45,34 %
13 NS 3S W-1 100 8.8 40.00
14 NS 3S S = 400 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a13 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 55,32 %
15 NS 3C E+1 -170 5.5 25.00
16 NS 2C N-1 -50 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a12 Diane de Meeus -Anne France Raquez 31,27 %
17 NS 2P N = 110 17.5 79.55
18 NS 3S W-2 100 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
a11 Nicolas de Neve -Chantal de Lichtervelde 56,52 %
19 NS 2S E = -120 7.7 35.00
20 NS 3S S-2 -200 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a10 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 41,89 %
21 NS 3K W-2 100 20.8 94.55
22 NS 3P S+1 170 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
a.9 Patrick Gilles -Noelle Fosse 59,68 %
23 NS 3P N-1 -100 1.2 5.45
24 NS 1S E-2 100 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a.8 Helene Schyns -Fabienne Smit 51,95 %
25 NS 3S S+1 430 9.9 45.00
26 NS 1S W+1 -120 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
Total : 264,2 / 484 = 54,59 %
PAIRE A12 Liliane Baptista -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
a10 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 41,89 %
1 NS 3K W-2 100 11 50.00
2 NS 4T W-1 50 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a.9 Patrick Gilles -Noelle Fosse 59,68 %
3 NS 2C S = 110 15 68.18
4 NS 2C E-2 200 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a.8 Helene Schyns -Fabienne Smit 51,95 %
5 NS 1S N-1 -100 14.3 65.00
6 NS 4P E-2 200 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
a.7 Michel Lievens -Teresa Dekoster 49,64 %
7 NS 3C W+1 -170 11 50.00
8 NS 2P S+1 140 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a.6 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 41,46 %
9 NS 4P W = -620 11 50.00
10 NS 4C S+1 650 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
a.5 Dominique Sassen -Danielle Wybauw 51,44 %
11 NS 6T E+1 -940 0.1 0.45
12 NS 4C W-2 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a.4 - 0,00 %
13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 54,85 %
15 NS 2K E+3 -150 14.3 65.00
16 NS 2P W = -110 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Gaetan van de Werve 60,55 %
17 NS 1S S = 90 8.8 40.00
18 NS 3S W+1 -430 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a.1 Catherine de Moffarts -Anne Arsac 45,34 %
19 NS 2C E+1 -140 2.3 10.45
20 NS 1S N+2 150 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a12 Diane de Meeus -Anne France Raquez 31,27 %
23 NS 3K W-1 100 4.5 20.45
24 NS 2C N-1 -50 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a11 Nicolas de Neve -Chantal de Lichtervelde 56,52 %
25 NS 3S S = 400 3.4 15.45
26 NS 1S W = -90 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 256,4 / 484 = 52,98 %
PAIRE A.7 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes
a13 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 55,32 %
1 NS 3P S = 140 15.4 70.00
2 NS 5T W-2 100 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
a12 Diane de Meeus -Anne France Raquez 31,27 %
3 NS 2C S+1 140 21 95.45
4 NS 2P N+2 170 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
a11 Nicolas de Neve -Chantal de Lichtervelde 56,52 %
5 NS 3S N-4 -400 1.2 5.45
6 NS 3P W+1 -170 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a10 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 41,89 %
7 NS 3T E+1 -130 17.5 79.55
8 NS 2S N = 120 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a.9 Patrick Gilles -Noelle Fosse 59,68 %
9 NS 4P W = -620 11 50.00
10 NS 4C N = 620 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a.7 Michel Lievens -Teresa Dekoster 49,64 %
13 NS 1P N+2 140 17.5 79.55
14 NS 4C N-4 -200 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a.6 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 41,46 %
15 NS 2K E+3 -150 14.3 65.00
16 NS 2P W-1 100 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a.5 Dominique Sassen -Danielle Wybauw 51,44 %
17 NS 4T S = 130 21.9 99.55
18 NS 3S W = -400 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
a.4 - 0,00 %
19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 54,85 %
21 NS 1S W = -90 5.5 25.00
22 NS 4C W-1 100 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Gaetan van de Werve 60,55 %
23 NS 2P N = 110 7.7 35.00
24 NS 1S E = -90 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a.1 Catherine de Moffarts -Anne Arsac 45,34 %
25 NS 3S S+1 430 9.9 45.00
26 NS 1S E+1 -120 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
Total : 255,8 / 484 = 52,85 %
PAIRE A10 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger
a.6 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 41,46 %
1 NS 4P S-1 -50 4.5 20.45
2 NS 3T W+1 -130 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
a.5 Dominique Sassen -Danielle Wybauw 51,44 %
3 NS 2C S-2 -100 3 13.64
4 NS 2C E-3 300 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.4 - 0,00 %
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 54,85 %
7 NS 2P S-1 -100 19.7 89.55
8 NS 2P S+1 140 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 84,55 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Gaetan van de Werve 60,55 %
9 NS 4P W = -620 11 50.00
10 NS 4C S = 620 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a.1 Catherine de Moffarts -Anne Arsac 45,34 %
11 NS 4P W+3 -510 11 50.00
12 NS 4C W-2 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a13 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 55,32 %
13 NS 3P N-1 -100 3.4 15.45
14 NS 4C N-3 -150 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 15,45 %
a12 Diane de Meeus -Anne France Raquez 31,27 %
15 NS 2K E+1 -110 21.9 99.55
16 NS 2S S-2 -100 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a10 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 41,89 %
19 NS 3K E-1 100 15.4 70.00
20 NS 2P W+1 -140 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.9 Patrick Gilles -Noelle Fosse 59,68 %
21 NS 1S W+1 -120 0.1 0.45
22 NS 4C W-2 200 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.8 Helene Schyns -Fabienne Smit 51,95 %
23 NS 2P N = 110 7.7 35.00
24 NS 2C N+1 140 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a.7 Michel Lievens -Teresa Dekoster 49,64 %
25 NS 3S S+2 460 18.6 84.55
26 NS 1S W+1 -120 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
Total : 243,9 / 484 = 50,39 %
PAIRE A.5 Serge Alard -Jean Chabotier
a.9 Patrick Gilles -Noelle Fosse 59,68 %
1 NS 4C N-1 -50 4.5 20.45
2 NS 3T W = -110 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
a.8 Helene Schyns -Fabienne Smit 51,95 %
3 NS 2C S = 110 15 68.18
4 NS 3K S-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a.7 Michel Lievens -Teresa Dekoster 49,64 %
5 NS 1S N-1 -100 14.3 65.00
6 NS 2P W+2 -170 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.5 Dominique Sassen -Danielle Wybauw 51,44 %
9 NS 4P W = -620 11 50.00
10 NS 4C S = 620 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a.4 - 0,00 %
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 54,85 %
13 NS 1P N+1 110 12.1 55.00
14 NS 3S S-1 -50 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Gaetan van de Werve 60,55 %
15 NS 2K E+3 -150 14.3 65.00
16 NS 2C N-3 -150 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a.1 Catherine de Moffarts -Anne Arsac 45,34 %
17 NS 3C E-1 50 4.5 20.45
18 NS 1C W+4 -200 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a13 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 55,32 %
19 NS 4C W-2 200 19.7 89.55
20 NS 1S N+1 120 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 84,55 %
a12 Diane de Meeus -Anne France Raquez 31,27 %
21 NS 1S W-1 50 14.3 65.00
22 NS 3P S+1 170 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
a11 Nicolas de Neve -Chantal de Lichtervelde 56,52 %
23 NS 4P N = 620 21.9 99.55
24 NS 1S E-2 100 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a10 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 41,89 %
25 NS 3S S+1 430 9.9 45.00
26 NS 1S W+2 -150 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
Total : 238,4 / 484 = 49,26 %
PAIRE A.3 Nicole Leclere -Madeleine Gabriel
a.5 Dominique Sassen -Danielle Wybauw 51,44 %
1 NS 4C N = 420 20.8 94.55
2 NS 3T W = -110 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 54,85 %
5 NS 3T N-1 -100 14.3 65.00
6 NS 2C E = -110 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 67,50 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Gaetan van de Werve 60,55 %
7 NS 3C W+1 -170 11 50.00
8 NS 2P S = 110 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a.1 Catherine de Moffarts -Anne Arsac 45,34 %
9 NS 4P E = -620 11 50.00
10 NS 4C S+1 650 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
a13 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 55,32 %
11 NS 5T E+2 -440 21.9 99.55
12 NS 3C W-1 50 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a12 Diane de Meeus -Anne France Raquez 31,27 %
13 NS 1P N+1 110 12.1 55.00
14 NS 3S S+1 430 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a11 Nicolas de Neve -Chantal de Lichtervelde 56,52 %
15 NS 2C E+3 -200 1.2 5.45
16 NS 2P W+1 -140 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 7,95 %
a10 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 41,89 %
17 NS 1S S+1 120 19.7 89.55
18 NS 3S W+1 -430 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a.9 Patrick Gilles -Noelle Fosse 59,68 %
19 NS 2C E = -110 11 50.00
20 NS 5T N-3 -300 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a.8 Helene Schyns -Fabienne Smit 51,95 %
21 NS 1S W = -90 5.5 25.00
22 NS 2C W+1 -140 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 12,73 %
a.7 Michel Lievens -Teresa Dekoster 49,64 %
23 NS 2P N+1 140 15.4 70.00
24 NS 1P S-1 -50 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.6 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 41,46 %
25 NS 3S S+2 460 18.6 84.55
26 NS 1S W+1 -120 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
Total : 253,2 / 528 = 47,95 %
PAIRE A.1 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse
a.1 Catherine de Moffarts -Anne Arsac 45,34 %
1 NS 4P S-1 -50 4.5 20.45
2 NS 3T W-1 50 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 45,23 %
a13 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 55,32 %
3 NS 2C S-3 -150 0 0.00
4 NS 2P N+1 140 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
a12 Diane de Meeus -Anne France Raquez 31,27 %
5 NS 1S N = 90 19.7 89.55
6 NS 2C E-1 100 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 87,05 %
a11 Nicolas de Neve -Chantal de Lichtervelde 56,52 %
7 NS 3P S-3 -300 0.1 0.45
8 NS 2S N = 120 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a10 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 41,89 %
9 NS 4P E = -620 11 50.00
10 NS 3S S+3 690 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a.9 Patrick Gilles -Noelle Fosse 59,68 %
11 NS 4P W+3 -510 11 50.00
12 NS 4P N+1 650 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a.8 Helene Schyns -Fabienne Smit 51,95 %
13 NS 4C N-2 -200 0.1 0.45
14 NS 3S S-2 -100 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
a.7 Michel Lievens -Teresa Dekoster 49,64 %
15 NS 2K E+3 -150 14.3 65.00
16 NS 2C N-2 -100 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.6 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 41,46 %
17 NS 3C E-2 100 14.3 65.00
18 NS 3S W+1 -430 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.5 Dominique Sassen -Danielle Wybauw 51,44 %
19 NS 2C E+1 -140 2.3 10.45
20 NS 3T N-2 -200 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 12,95 %
a.4 - 0,00 %
21 NS BYE 0 0.00
22 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 54,85 %
23 NS 3P N = 140 15.4 70.00
24 NS 2C N-2 -100 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
Total : 217,1 / 484 = 44,86 %
PAIRE A.6 Ines Drory -Simone Munsterhjelm
a11 Nicolas de Neve -Chantal de Lichtervelde 56,52 %
1 NS 2S S-1 -50 4.5 20.45
2 NS 2T W = -90 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a10 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 41,89 %
3 NS 2C S = 110 15 68.18
4 NS 2P N = 110 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.9 Patrick Gilles -Noelle Fosse 59,68 %
5 NS 3T N-3 -300 5.5 25.00
6 NS 2P W+5 -260 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.8 Helene Schyns -Fabienne Smit 51,95 %
7 NS 3C W+1 -170 11 50.00
8 NS 2S N = 120 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.6 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 41,46 %
11 NS 3S E+3 -490 17.5 79.55
12 NS 4C W-2 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a.5 Dominique Sassen -Danielle Wybauw 51,44 %
13 NS 4P N-1 -100 3.4 15.45
14 NS 4C N-3 -150 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 15,45 %
a.4 - 0,00 %
15 NS BYE 0 0.00
16 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 54,85 %
17 NS 3C E-2 100 14.3 65.00
18 NS 3S W+1 -430 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Gaetan van de Werve 60,55 %
19 NS 4C W-1 100 15.4 70.00
20 NS 1C W+2 -140 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.1 Catherine de Moffarts -Anne Arsac 45,34 %
21 NS 2S W-1 50 14.3 65.00
22 NS 3P S+1 170 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
a13 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 55,32 %
23 NS 2P N+1 140 15.4 70.00
24 NS 1S E = -90 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
a12 Diane de Meeus -Anne France Raquez 31,27 %
25 NS 5S S-2 -100 0.1 0.45
26 NS 1S W-1 100 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 215,3 / 484 = 44,48 %
PAIRE A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Lydia Wildiers
a.2 Francoise Duren -Gaetan van de Werve 60,55 %
3 NS 2K S-1 -50 8 36.36
4 NS 2S S+1 150 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.1 Catherine de Moffarts -Anne Arsac 45,34 %
5 NS 3T N-1 -100 14.3 65.00
6 NS 3S W = -600 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a13 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 55,32 %
7 NS 4P S-2 -200 3.4 15.45
8 NS 3S N-3 -150 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 7,95 %
a12 Diane de Meeus -Anne France Raquez 31,27 %
9 NS 4P W = -620 11 50.00
10 NS 4C N = 620 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a11 Nicolas de Neve -Chantal de Lichtervelde 56,52 %
11 NS 3S E+4 -520 3.4 15.45
12 NS 4C W-2 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a10 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 41,89 %
13 NS 1P N+2 140 17.5 79.55
14 NS 3S S+1 430 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 84,55 %
a.9 Patrick Gilles -Noelle Fosse 59,68 %
15 NS 1C E+4 -200 1.2 5.45
16 NS 2P W-1 100 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.8 Helene Schyns -Fabienne Smit 51,95 %
17 NS 1S S = 90 8.8 40.00
18 NS 3S W+2 -460 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.7 Michel Lievens -Teresa Dekoster 49,64 %
19 NS 2S E = -120 7.7 35.00
20 NS 1S N = 90 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.6 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 41,46 %
21 NS 2K W-1 50 14.3 65.00
22 NS 4C W-1 100 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
a.5 Dominique Sassen -Danielle Wybauw 51,44 %
23 NS 3P N = 140 15.4 70.00
24 NS 2C S = 110 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 72,50 %
a.4 - 0,00 %
25 NS BYE 0 0.00
26 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 213,8 / 484 = 44,17 %
PAIRE A11 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn
a.8 Helene Schyns -Fabienne Smit 51,95 %
1 NS 3P S = 140 15.4 70.00
2 NS 3T W-1 50 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
a.7 Michel Lievens -Teresa Dekoster 49,64 %
3 NS 2C S-2 -100 3 13.64
4 NS 2P N+1 140 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.6 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 41,46 %
5 NS 1S N-3 -300 5.5 25.00
6 NS 3P W+2 -200 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 27,50 %
a.5 Dominique Sassen -Danielle Wybauw 51,44 %
7 NS 3C W+1 -170 11 50.00
8 NS 2P S = 110 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a.4 - 0,00 %
9 NS BYE 0 0.00
10 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 54,85 %
11 NS 3S E+4 -520 3.4 15.45
12 NS 4C W = -420 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 7,95 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Gaetan van de Werve 60,55 %
13 NS 1P N = 80 6.6 30.00
14 NS 2C S-2 -100 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 32,50 %
a.1 Catherine de Moffarts -Anne Arsac 45,34 %
15 NS 2C E+2 -170 5.5 25.00
16 NS 3K E-3 300 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a13 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 55,32 %
17 NS 1S S = 90 8.8 40.00
18 NS 3S W+2 -460 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a11 Nicolas de Neve -Chantal de Lichtervelde 56,52 %
21 NS 1S W-1 50 14.3 65.00
22 NS 3P S+1 170 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
a10 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 41,89 %
23 NS 4P N-1 -100 1.2 5.45
24 NS 2C N = 110 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
a.9 Patrick Gilles -Noelle Fosse 59,68 %
25 NS 3S N = 400 3.4 15.45
26 NS 1S W+1 -120 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
Total : 184,1 / 484 = 38,04 %
PAIRE a.2 Francoise Duren -Gaetan van de Werve
A.8 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander 55,52 %
1 EO 4P S-1 -50 17.5 79.55
2 EO 3T W = -110 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Lydia Wildiers 44,17 %
3 EO 2K S-1 -50 14 63.64
4 EO 2S S+1 150 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.9 Pascale Ortegat -Jean de Villenfagne 55,68 %
5 EO 3T N = 110 0.1 0.45
6 EO 4P W = -620 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.3 Nicole Leclere -Madeleine Gabriel 47,95 %
7 EO 3C W+1 -170 11 50.00
8 EO 2P S = 110 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A10 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger 50,39 %
9 EO 4P W = -620 11 50.00
10 EO 4C S = 620 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A.4 Stan Tabor -Alan Beckman 54,59 %
11 EO 4P W+3 -510 11 50.00
12 EO 3P N+2 200 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A11 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn 38,04 %
13 EO 1P N = 80 15.4 70.00
14 EO 2C S-2 -100 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 67,50 %
A.5 Serge Alard -Jean Chabotier 49,26 %
15 EO 2K E+3 -150 7.7 35.00
16 EO 2C N-3 -150 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A12 Liliane Baptista -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,98 %
17 EO 1S S = 90 13.2 60.00
18 EO 3S W+1 -430 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A.6 Ines Drory -Simone Munsterhjelm 44,48 %
19 EO 4C W-1 100 6.6 30.00
20 EO 1C W+2 -140 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A13 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 59,52 %
21 EO 1S W = -90 16.5 75.00
22 EO 3P N = 140 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 67,50 %
A.7 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes 52,85 %
23 EO 2P N = 110 14.3 65.00
24 EO 1S E = -90 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
Total : 319,7 / 528 = 60,55 %
PAIRE a.9 Patrick Gilles -Noelle Fosse
A.5 Serge Alard -Jean Chabotier 49,26 %
1 EO 4C N-1 -50 17.5 79.55
2 EO 3T W = -110 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
A12 Liliane Baptista -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,98 %
3 EO 2C S = 110 7 31.82
4 EO 2C E-2 200 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A.6 Ines Drory -Simone Munsterhjelm 44,48 %
5 EO 3T N-3 -300 16.5 75.00
6 EO 2P W+5 -260 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A13 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 59,52 %
7 EO 3P S-2 -200 18.6 84.55
8 EO 2S N = 120 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A.7 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes 52,85 %
9 EO 4P W = -620 11 50.00
10 EO 4C N = 620 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A.1 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 44,86 %
11 EO 4P W+3 -510 11 50.00
12 EO 4P N+1 650 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Lydia Wildiers 44,17 %
15 EO 1C E+4 -200 20.8 94.55
16 EO 2P W-1 100 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.9 Pascale Ortegat -Jean de Villenfagne 55,68 %
17 EO 1S S-1 -50 20.8 94.55
18 EO 3S W-1 50 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.3 Nicole Leclere -Madeleine Gabriel 47,95 %
19 EO 2C E = -110 11 50.00
20 EO 5T N-3 -300 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A10 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger 50,39 %
21 EO 1S W+1 -120 21.9 99.55
22 EO 4C W-2 200 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.4 Stan Tabor -Alan Beckman 54,59 %
23 EO 3P N-1 -100 20.8 94.55
24 EO 1S E-2 100 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A11 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn 38,04 %
25 EO 3S N = 400 18.6 84.55
26 EO 1S W+1 -120 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
Total : 315,1 / 528 = 59,68 %
PAIRE a11 Nicolas de Neve -Chantal de Lichtervelde
A.6 Ines Drory -Simone Munsterhjelm 44,48 %
1 EO 2S S-1 -50 17.5 79.55
2 EO 2T W = -90 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A13 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 59,52 %
3 EO 2C S = 110 7 31.82
4 EO 3K S = 110 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.7 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes 52,85 %
5 EO 3S N-4 -400 20.8 94.55
6 EO 3P W+1 -170 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A.1 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 44,86 %
7 EO 3P S-3 -300 21.9 99.55
8 EO 2S N = 120 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.8 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander 55,52 %
9 EO 4P W = -620 11 50.00
10 EO 3S S+3 690 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Lydia Wildiers 44,17 %
11 EO 3S E+4 -520 18.6 84.55
12 EO 4C W-2 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A.9 Pascale Ortegat -Jean de Villenfagne 55,68 %
13 EO 3P N = 140 4.5 20.45
14 EO 3S S-1 -50 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A.3 Nicole Leclere -Madeleine Gabriel 47,95 %
15 EO 2C E+3 -200 20.8 94.55
16 EO 2P W+1 -140 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 92,05 %
A.4 Stan Tabor -Alan Beckman 54,59 %
19 EO 2S E = -120 14.3 65.00
20 EO 3S S-2 -200 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A11 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn 38,04 %
21 EO 1S W-1 50 7.7 35.00
22 EO 3P S+1 170 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
A.5 Serge Alard -Jean Chabotier 49,26 %
23 EO 4P N = 620 0.1 0.45
24 EO 1S E-2 100 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A12 Liliane Baptista -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,98 %
25 EO 3S S = 400 18.6 84.55
26 EO 1S W = -90 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 298,4 / 528 = 56,52 %
PAIRE a13 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru
A.7 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes 52,85 %
1 EO 3P S = 140 6.6 30.00
2 EO 5T W-2 100 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
A.1 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 44,86 %
3 EO 2C S-3 -150 22 100.00
4 EO 2P N+1 140 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
A.8 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander 55,52 %
5 EO 3S W = -400 20.8 94.55
6 EO 4K S-3 -150 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Lydia Wildiers 44,17 %
7 EO 4P S-2 -200 18.6 84.55
8 EO 3S N-3 -150 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 92,05 %
A.9 Pascale Ortegat -Jean de Villenfagne 55,68 %
9 EO 4P W = -620 11 50.00
10 EO 4C S = 620 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A.3 Nicole Leclere -Madeleine Gabriel 47,95 %
11 EO 5T E+2 -440 0.1 0.45
12 EO 3C W-1 50 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A10 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger 50,39 %
13 EO 3P N-1 -100 18.6 84.55
14 EO 4C N-3 -150 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 84,55 %
A.4 Stan Tabor -Alan Beckman 54,59 %
15 EO 3C E+1 -170 16.5 75.00
16 EO 2C N-1 -50 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A11 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn 38,04 %
17 EO 1S S = 90 13.2 60.00
18 EO 3S W+2 -460 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.5 Serge Alard -Jean Chabotier 49,26 %
19 EO 4C W-2 200 2.3 10.45
20 EO 1S N+1 120 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 15,45 %
A.6 Ines Drory -Simone Munsterhjelm 44,48 %
23 EO 2P N+1 140 6.6 30.00
24 EO 1S E = -90 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
A13 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 59,52 %
25 EO 3S S+2 460 3.4 15.45
26 EO 1S S-1 -100 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
Total : 292,1 / 528 = 55,32 %
PAIRE a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger
A.9 Pascale Ortegat -Jean de Villenfagne 55,68 %
3 EO 2C S-1 -50 14 63.64
4 EO 2P N+1 140 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A.3 Nicole Leclere -Madeleine Gabriel 47,95 %
5 EO 3T N-1 -100 7.7 35.00
6 EO 2C E = -110 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 32,50 %
A10 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger 50,39 %
7 EO 2P S-1 -100 2.3 10.45
8 EO 2P S+1 140 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 15,45 %
A.4 Stan Tabor -Alan Beckman 54,59 %
9 EO 4P W = -620 11 50.00
10 EO 2C N+2 170 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A11 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn 38,04 %
11 EO 3S E+4 -520 18.6 84.55
12 EO 4C W = -420 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 92,05 %
A.5 Serge Alard -Jean Chabotier 49,26 %
13 EO 1P N+1 110 9.9 45.00
14 EO 3S S-1 -50 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A12 Liliane Baptista -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,98 %
15 EO 2K E+3 -150 7.7 35.00
16 EO 2P W = -110 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
A.6 Ines Drory -Simone Munsterhjelm 44,48 %
17 EO 3C E-2 100 7.7 35.00
18 EO 3S W+1 -430 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A13 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 59,52 %
19 EO 2C W+1 -140 19.7 89.55
20 EO 1S N+2 150 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.7 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes 52,85 %
21 EO 1S W = -90 16.5 75.00
22 EO 4C W-1 100 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
A.1 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 44,86 %
23 EO 3P N = 140 6.6 30.00
24 EO 2C N-2 -100 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A.8 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander 55,52 %
25 EO 3S S+2 460 3.4 15.45
26 EO 1S W+1 -120 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
Total : 289,6 / 528 = 54,85 %
PAIRE a.8 Helene Schyns -Fabienne Smit
A11 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn 38,04 %
1 EO 3P S = 140 6.6 30.00
2 EO 3T W-1 50 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
A.5 Serge Alard -Jean Chabotier 49,26 %
3 EO 2C S = 110 7 31.82
4 EO 3K S-1 -100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A12 Liliane Baptista -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,98 %
5 EO 1S N-1 -100 7.7 35.00
6 EO 4P E-2 200 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
A.6 Ines Drory -Simone Munsterhjelm 44,48 %
7 EO 3C W+1 -170 11 50.00
8 EO 2S N = 120 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A13 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 59,52 %
9 EO 4P E = -620 11 50.00
10 EO 3S S+1 630 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.1 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 44,86 %
13 EO 4C N-2 -200 21.9 99.55
14 EO 3S S-2 -100 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
A.8 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander 55,52 %
15 EO 2K E+3 -150 7.7 35.00
16 EO 2C N-2 -100 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Lydia Wildiers 44,17 %
17 EO 1S S = 90 13.2 60.00
18 EO 3S W+2 -460 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.9 Pascale Ortegat -Jean de Villenfagne 55,68 %
19 EO 4CcE-2 500 0.1 0.45
20 EO 2P E = -110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A.3 Nicole Leclere -Madeleine Gabriel 47,95 %
21 EO 1S W = -90 16.5 75.00
22 EO 2C W+1 -140 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 87,27 %
A10 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger 50,39 %
23 EO 2P N = 110 14.3 65.00
24 EO 2C N+1 140 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A.4 Stan Tabor -Alan Beckman 54,59 %
25 EO 3S S+1 430 12.1 55.00
26 EO 1S W+1 -120 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
Total : 274,3 / 528 = 51,95 %
PAIRE a.5 Dominique Sassen -Danielle Wybauw
A.3 Nicole Leclere -Madeleine Gabriel 47,95 %
1 EO 4C N = 420 1.2 5.45
2 EO 3T W = -110 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A10 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger 50,39 %
3 EO 2C S-2 -100 19 86.36
4 EO 2C E-3 300 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A11 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn 38,04 %
7 EO 3C W+1 -170 11 50.00
8 EO 2P S = 110 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A.5 Serge Alard -Jean Chabotier 49,26 %
9 EO 4P W = -620 11 50.00
10 EO 4C S = 620 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A12 Liliane Baptista -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,98 %
11 EO 6T E+1 -940 21.9 99.55
12 EO 4C W-2 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A.6 Ines Drory -Simone Munsterhjelm 44,48 %
13 EO 4P N-1 -100 18.6 84.55
14 EO 4C N-3 -150 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 84,55 %
A13 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 59,52 %
15 EO 2K E+3 -150 7.7 35.00
16 EO 2C N-2 -100 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.7 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes 52,85 %
17 EO 4T S = 130 0.1 0.45
18 EO 3S W = -400 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
A.1 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 44,86 %
19 EO 2C E+1 -140 19.7 89.55
20 EO 3T N-2 -200 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 87,05 %
A.8 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander 55,52 %
21 EO 1P E-2 100 1.2 5.45
22 EO 2P S+1 140 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Lydia Wildiers 44,17 %
23 EO 3P N = 140 6.6 30.00
24 EO 2C S = 110 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 27,50 %
A.9 Pascale Ortegat -Jean de Villenfagne 55,68 %
25 EO 3S S+1 430 12.1 55.00
26 EO 1S W = -90 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
Total : 271,6 / 528 = 51,44 %
PAIRE a.7 Michel Lievens -Teresa Dekoster
A.4 Stan Tabor -Alan Beckman 54,59 %
1 EO 2C N+1 140 6.6 30.00
2 EO 4T W-1 50 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
A11 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn 38,04 %
3 EO 2C S-2 -100 19 86.36
4 EO 2P N+1 140 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.5 Serge Alard -Jean Chabotier 49,26 %
5 EO 1S N-1 -100 7.7 35.00
6 EO 2P W+2 -170 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A12 Liliane Baptista -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,98 %
7 EO 3C W+1 -170 11 50.00
8 EO 2P S+1 140 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A13 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 59,52 %
11 EO 4P W+3 -510 11 50.00
12 EO 4P N+1 650 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A.7 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes 52,85 %
13 EO 1P N+2 140 4.5 20.45
14 EO 4C N-4 -200 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A.1 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 44,86 %
15 EO 2K E+3 -150 7.7 35.00
16 EO 2C N-2 -100 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.8 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander 55,52 %
17 EO 1S S-1 -50 20.8 94.55
18 EO 3S W+1 -430 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Lydia Wildiers 44,17 %
19 EO 2S E = -120 14.3 65.00
20 EO 1S N = 90 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.9 Pascale Ortegat -Jean de Villenfagne 55,68 %
21 EO 1S W = -90 16.5 75.00
22 EO 2P S+1 140 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 67,50 %
A.3 Nicole Leclere -Madeleine Gabriel 47,95 %
23 EO 2P N+1 140 6.6 30.00
24 EO 1P S-1 -50 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A10 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger 50,39 %
25 EO 3S S+2 460 3.4 15.45
26 EO 1S W+1 -120 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
Total : 262,1 / 528 = 49,64 %
PAIRE a.1 Catherine de Moffarts -Anne Arsac
A.1 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 44,86 %
1 EO 4P S-1 -50 17.5 79.55
2 EO 3T W-1 50 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 54,77 %
A.8 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander 55,52 %
3 EO 2C S-1 -50 14 63.64
4 EO 2C E-3 300 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Lydia Wildiers 44,17 %
5 EO 3T N-1 -100 7.7 35.00
6 EO 3S W = -600 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A.9 Pascale Ortegat -Jean de Villenfagne 55,68 %
7 EO 3C W+1 -170 11 50.00
8 EO 3P S = 140 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A.3 Nicole Leclere -Madeleine Gabriel 47,95 %
9 EO 4P E = -620 11 50.00
10 EO 4C S+1 650 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
A10 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger 50,39 %
11 EO 4P W+3 -510 11 50.00
12 EO 4C W-2 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.4 Stan Tabor -Alan Beckman 54,59 %
13 EO 3S W-1 100 13.2 60.00
14 EO 3S S = 400 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A11 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn 38,04 %
15 EO 2C E+2 -170 16.5 75.00
16 EO 3K E-3 300 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A.5 Serge Alard -Jean Chabotier 49,26 %
17 EO 3C E-1 50 17.5 79.55
18 EO 1C W+4 -200 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A12 Liliane Baptista -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,98 %
19 EO 2C E+1 -140 19.7 89.55
20 EO 1S N+2 150 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.6 Ines Drory -Simone Munsterhjelm 44,48 %
21 EO 2S W-1 50 7.7 35.00
22 EO 3P S+1 170 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
A.7 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes 52,85 %
25 EO 3S S+1 430 12.1 55.00
26 EO 1S E+1 -120 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
Total : 239,4 / 528 = 45,34 %
PAIRE a10 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot
A12 Liliane Baptista -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,98 %
1 EO 3K W-2 100 11 50.00
2 EO 4T W-1 50 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A.6 Ines Drory -Simone Munsterhjelm 44,48 %
3 EO 2C S = 110 7 31.82
4 EO 2P N = 110 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A13 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 59,52 %
5 EO 1S N-2 -200 13.2 60.00
6 EO 3S E-1 100 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A.7 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes 52,85 %
7 EO 3T E+1 -130 4.5 20.45
8 EO 2S N = 120 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A.1 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 44,86 %
9 EO 4P E = -620 11 50.00
10 EO 3S S+3 690 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A.8 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander 55,52 %
11 EO 5P W+1 -480 2.3 10.45
12 EO 3C W = -140 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Lydia Wildiers 44,17 %
13 EO 1P N+2 140 4.5 20.45
14 EO 3S S+1 430 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 15,45 %
A.3 Nicole Leclere -Madeleine Gabriel 47,95 %
17 EO 1S S+1 120 2.3 10.45
18 EO 3S W+1 -430 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A10 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger 50,39 %
19 EO 3K E-1 100 6.6 30.00
20 EO 2P W+1 -140 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.4 Stan Tabor -Alan Beckman 54,59 %
21 EO 3K W-2 100 1.2 5.45
22 EO 3P S+1 170 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
A11 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn 38,04 %
23 EO 4P N-1 -100 20.8 94.55
24 EO 2C N = 110 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
A.5 Serge Alard -Jean Chabotier 49,26 %
25 EO 3S S+1 430 12.1 55.00
26 EO 1S W+2 -150 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
Total : 221,2 / 528 = 41,89 %
PAIRE a.6 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens
A10 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger 50,39 %
1 EO 4P S-1 -50 17.5 79.55
2 EO 3T W+1 -130 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
A.4 Stan Tabor -Alan Beckman 54,59 %
3 EO 2C S+1 140 1 4.55
4 EO 2P N+1 140 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A11 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn 38,04 %
5 EO 1S N-3 -300 16.5 75.00
6 EO 3P W+2 -200 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 72,50 %
A12 Liliane Baptista -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,98 %
9 EO 4P W = -620 11 50.00
10 EO 4C S+1 650 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
A.6 Ines Drory -Simone Munsterhjelm 44,48 %
11 EO 3S E+3 -490 4.5 20.45
12 EO 4C W-2 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A13 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 59,52 %
13 EO 1P N+3 170 0.1 0.45
14 EO 3S S+1 430 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 5,45 %
A.7 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes 52,85 %
15 EO 2K E+3 -150 7.7 35.00
16 EO 2P W-1 100 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A.1 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 44,86 %
17 EO 3C E-2 100 7.7 35.00
18 EO 3S W+1 -430 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.8 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander 55,52 %
19 EO 2P E-1 100 6.6 30.00
20 EO 2K N-1 -100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Lydia Wildiers 44,17 %
21 EO 2K W-1 50 7.7 35.00
22 EO 4C W-1 100 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
A.9 Pascale Ortegat -Jean de Villenfagne 55,68 %
23 EO 2P N+1 140 6.6 30.00
24 EO 2C N+1 140 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
A.3 Nicole Leclere -Madeleine Gabriel 47,95 %
25 EO 3S S+2 460 3.4 15.45
26 EO 1S W+1 -120 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
Total : 218,9 / 528 = 41,46 %
PAIRE a12 Diane de Meeus -Anne France Raquez
A13 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 59,52 %
1 EO 4P S = 420 1.2 5.45
2 EO 3T W-1 50 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
A.7 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes 52,85 %
3 EO 2C S+1 140 1 4.55
4 EO 2P N+2 170 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
A.1 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 44,86 %
5 EO 1S N = 90 2.3 10.45
6 EO 2C E-1 100 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 12,95 %
A.8 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander 55,52 %
7 EO 2P S = 110 0.1 0.45
8 EO 2S N+2 180 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 0,45 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Lydia Wildiers 44,17 %
9 EO 4P W = -620 11 50.00
10 EO 4C N = 620 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A.9 Pascale Ortegat -Jean de Villenfagne 55,68 %
11 EO 4P W+3 -510 11 50.00
12 EO 4C W-2 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.3 Nicole Leclere -Madeleine Gabriel 47,95 %
13 EO 1P N+1 110 9.9 45.00
14 EO 3S S+1 430 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A10 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger 50,39 %
15 EO 2K E+1 -110 0.1 0.45
16 EO 2S S-2 -100 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A.4 Stan Tabor -Alan Beckman 54,59 %
17 EO 2P N = 110 4.5 20.45
18 EO 3S W-2 100 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
A.5 Serge Alard -Jean Chabotier 49,26 %
21 EO 1S W-1 50 7.7 35.00
22 EO 3P S+1 170 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
A12 Liliane Baptista -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,98 %
23 EO 3K W-1 100 17.5 79.55
24 EO 2C N-1 -50 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A.6 Ines Drory -Simone Munsterhjelm 44,48 %
25 EO 5S S-2 -100 21.9 99.55
26 EO 1S W-1 100 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 165,1 / 528 = 31,27 %
PAIRE a.4 -
A.9 Pascale Ortegat -Jean de Villenfagne 55,68 %
1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A10 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger 50,39 %
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.4 Stan Tabor -Alan Beckman 54,59 %
7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A11 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn 38,04 %
9 EO BYE 0 0.00
10 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.5 Serge Alard -Jean Chabotier 49,26 %
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A12 Liliane Baptista -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,98 %
13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.6 Ines Drory -Simone Munsterhjelm 44,48 %
15 EO BYE 0 0.00
16 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A13 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 59,52 %
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.7 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes 52,85 %
19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.1 Francoise Turin -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 44,86 %
21 EO BYE 0 0.00
22 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.8 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander 55,52 %
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Lydia Wildiers 44,17 %
25 EO BYE 0 0.00
26 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 572 = 0,00 %
|