B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 59,09 A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens
--- 2 57,39 A.9 Philippe van der Gracht -Noelle Fosse
--- 3 56,44 A10 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier
--- 4 55,30 A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli
--- 5 54,17 A11 Didier Collart -Claire Derieuw
--- 6 52,84 A12 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart
--- 7 49,81 A.2 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne
--- 8 47,35 A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary
--- 9 46,97 A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Marie J. de Wagheneire
--- 10 46,59 A.8 Michele Verhulst -Claire de Quirini
--- 11 43,56 A13 Regine de Hemptinne -Michou van Wetter
--- 12 42,23 A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten
--- 13 38,26 A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Annie Legrand
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 60,42 a.9 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles
--- 2 57,39 a.4 Dominique van de Werve -Marie Laure Peterbroeck
--- 3 53,98 a.7 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle
--- 4 53,41 a10 Jean de Villenfagne -Dilva Haym
--- 5 50,19 a.5 Dominique Sassen -Nicole Leclere
--- 6 49,81 a12 Serge Alard -Francoise Turin
--- 7 48,48 a11 Nadine Brabant -Pascale Bodart
--- 8 48,11 a.2 Catherine de Moffarts -Anne Arsac
--- 9 48,11 a.8 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes
--- 10 47,73 a13 Elisabeth Harmant -Claire Destin
--- 11 46,78 a.6 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon
--- 12 45,83 a.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert
--- 13 39,77 a.3 Jacques Podevyn -Helene Christiaens
PAIRE A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens
a.5 Dominique Sassen -Nicole Leclere 50,19 %
1 NS 4C S = 420 12 54.55
2 NS 2TcS-2 -500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.3 Jacques Podevyn -Helene Christiaens 39,77 %
5 NS 4C W = -420 6 27.27
6 NS 2P N+2 170 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.2 Catherine de Moffarts -Anne Arsac 48,11 %
7 NS 2C W+1 -140 9 40.91
8 NS 4P S = 420 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 45,83 %
9 NS 6P N = 980 22 100.00
10 NS 3S W = -600 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 95,45 %
a13 Elisabeth Harmant -Claire Destin 47,73 %
11 NS 2P N+1 140 20 90.91
12 NS 2C E-1 50 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a12 Serge Alard -Francoise Turin 49,81 %
13 NS 1C W = -80 2 9.09
14 NS 1S N = 90 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a11 Nadine Brabant -Pascale Bodart 48,48 %
15 NS 5T W = -400 19 86.36
16 NS 4P N-3 -150 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a10 Jean de Villenfagne -Dilva Haym 53,41 %
17 NS 4P S-2 -100 1 4.55
18 NS 2S E-2 100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.9 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 60,42 %
19 NS 2S N = 120 15 68.18
20 NS 2C W-3 300 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
a.8 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 48,11 %
21 NS 4P S = 620 13 59.09
22 NS 1P N+3 170 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.7 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 53,98 %
23 NS 3T E-2 200 18 81.82
24 NS 3S W+2 -460 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a.6 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon 46,78 %
25 NS 3K E = -110 15 68.18
26 NS 2C N = 110 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
Total : 312,0 / 528 = 59,09 %
PAIRE A.9 Philippe van der Gracht -Noelle Fosse
a.4 Dominique van de Werve -Marie Laure Peterbroeck 57,39 %
1 NS 6S S-1 -50 2 9.09
2 NS 2S N = 120 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.3 Jacques Podevyn -Helene Christiaens 39,77 %
3 NS 4C E+1 -650 5 22.73
4 NS 3T N+1 130 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.2 Catherine de Moffarts -Anne Arsac 48,11 %
5 NS 6CcW-3 500 22 100.00
6 NS 3P N+2 200 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 93,18 %
a.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 45,83 %
7 NS 2C W+1 -140 9 40.91
8 NS 4P S = 420 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a13 Elisabeth Harmant -Claire Destin 47,73 %
9 NS 4P N+2 480 17 77.27
10 NS 3S W+2 -660 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a12 Serge Alard -Francoise Turin 49,81 %
11 NS 2P N = 110 16 72.73
12 NS 3P N+1 170 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a11 Nadine Brabant -Pascale Bodart 48,48 %
13 NS 1S N = 90 8 36.36
14 NS 1S N-1 -50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a.9 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 60,42 %
17 NS 4P S-1 -50 7 31.82
18 NS 3C N-3 -300 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a.8 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 48,11 %
19 NS 2S N = 120 15 68.18
20 NS 1S E-1 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.7 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 53,98 %
21 NS 4P S = 620 13 59.09
22 NS 4C N = 420 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.6 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon 46,78 %
23 NS 1S E-1 100 12 54.55
24 NS 6S E-2 100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.5 Dominique Sassen -Nicole Leclere 50,19 %
25 NS 2S E = -120 11 50.00
26 NS 2C N = 110 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
Total : 303,0 / 528 = 57,39 %
PAIRE A10 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier
a.6 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon 46,78 %
1 NS 4C S+2 480 18 81.82
2 NS 4P W-1 50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.5 Dominique Sassen -Nicole Leclere 50,19 %
3 NS 4P W = -620 16 72.73
4 NS 1S W-1 100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.4 Dominique van de Werve -Marie Laure Peterbroeck 57,39 %
5 NS 4C W = -420 6 27.27
6 NS 2P N+2 170 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.3 Jacques Podevyn -Helene Christiaens 39,77 %
7 NS 2C W = -110 18 81.82
8 NS 4P S = 420 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a.2 Catherine de Moffarts -Anne Arsac 48,11 %
9 NS 6P N-2 -100 0 0.00
10 NS 3S W+2 -660 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
a.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 45,83 %
11 NS 2P N-1 -50 8 36.36
12 NS 4P N = 620 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a13 Elisabeth Harmant -Claire Destin 47,73 %
13 NS 1S W-3 300 22 100.00
14 NS 1S N+1 120 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 100,00 %
a12 Serge Alard -Francoise Turin 49,81 %
15 NS 3S W+4 -520 4 18.18
16 NS 5K E = -600 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
a10 Jean de Villenfagne -Dilva Haym 53,41 %
19 NS 2S N = 120 15 68.18
20 NS 1S E = -90 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.9 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 60,42 %
21 NS 4P S = 620 13 59.09
22 NS 4P N = 420 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.8 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 48,11 %
23 NS 1S E-3 300 21 95.45
24 NS 3S E+2 -460 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
a.7 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 53,98 %
25 NS 1C N = 80 22 100.00
26 NS 2K E+1 -110 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
Total : 298,0 / 528 = 56,44 %
PAIRE A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli
a13 Elisabeth Harmant -Claire Destin 47,73 %
1 NS 5K N = 400 7 31.82
2 NS 1K E-2 100 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a12 Serge Alard -Francoise Turin 49,81 %
3 NS 4C E = -620 16 72.73
4 NS 2C E-1 100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a11 Nadine Brabant -Pascale Bodart 48,48 %
5 NS 4C W-1 50 17 77.27
6 NS 4P N+1 450 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
a10 Jean de Villenfagne -Dilva Haym 53,41 %
7 NS 2K W+1 -110 18 81.82
8 NS 4P S = 420 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a.9 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 60,42 %
9 NS 4P N = 420 4 18.18
10 NS 3S W+2 -660 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.7 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 53,98 %
13 NS 1S N = 90 8 36.36
14 NS 1S N-1 -50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a.6 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon 46,78 %
15 NS 6T W = -920 2 9.09
16 NS 4C S-2 -100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.5 Dominique Sassen -Nicole Leclere 50,19 %
17 NS 4P S-2 -100 1 4.55
18 NS 2S E-5 250 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.4 Dominique van de Werve -Marie Laure Peterbroeck 57,39 %
19 NS 2S N-1 -50 0 0.00
20 NS 1S E-1 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a.3 Jacques Podevyn -Helene Christiaens 39,77 %
21 NS 4P S = 620 13 59.09
22 NS 1KcW-2 500 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
a.2 Catherine de Moffarts -Anne Arsac 48,11 %
23 NS 3T E-3 300 21 95.45
24 NS 5S E = -460 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
a.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 45,83 %
25 NS 2K E+2 -130 7 31.82
26 NS 2C N = 110 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
Total : 292,0 / 528 = 55,30 %
PAIRE A11 Didier Collart -Claire Derieuw
a.8 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 48,11 %
1 NS 5K N+1 420 12 54.55
2 NS 4P W-2 100 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a.7 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 53,98 %
3 NS 4P W = -620 16 72.73
4 NS 1S W-1 100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.6 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon 46,78 %
5 NS 4C W-1 50 17 77.27
6 NS 3P N = 140 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.5 Dominique Sassen -Nicole Leclere 50,19 %
7 NS 2C W+1 -140 9 40.91
8 NS 4P S = 420 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.4 Dominique van de Werve -Marie Laure Peterbroeck 57,39 %
9 NS 4P N+1 450 10 45.45
10 NS 3S W+2 -660 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.3 Jacques Podevyn -Helene Christiaens 39,77 %
11 NS 3P N-1 -50 8 36.36
12 NS 4P N = 620 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a.2 Catherine de Moffarts -Anne Arsac 48,11 %
13 NS 2S N = 120 15 68.18
14 NS 1S N = 90 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 45,83 %
15 NS 5T W+1 -420 15 68.18
16 NS 4K E+2 -170 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a13 Elisabeth Harmant -Claire Destin 47,73 %
17 NS 3P S = 140 16 72.73
18 NS 2S E-2 100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a11 Nadine Brabant -Pascale Bodart 48,48 %
21 NS 2T S+1 110 4 18.18
22 NS 4P N = 420 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a10 Jean de Villenfagne -Dilva Haym 53,41 %
23 NS 2P N = 110 16 72.73
24 NS 6S W = -990 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a.9 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 60,42 %
25 NS 1K E+2 -110 15 68.18
26 NS 2K E+2 -130 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
Total : 286,0 / 528 = 54,17 %
PAIRE A12 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart
a10 Jean de Villenfagne -Dilva Haym 53,41 %
1 NS 3S N+1 430 16 72.73
2 NS 1K E-1 50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a.9 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 60,42 %
3 NS 4P W+1 -650 5 22.73
4 NS 2P E-1 100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a.8 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 48,11 %
5 NS 4C W = -420 6 27.27
6 NS 2P N+3 200 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a.7 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 53,98 %
7 NS 2P N-4 -400 0 0.00
8 NS 4P S-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.6 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon 46,78 %
9 NS 5P N = 450 10 45.45
10 NS 3S W+1 -630 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a.5 Dominique Sassen -Nicole Leclere 50,19 %
11 NS 2P N = 110 16 72.73
12 NS 4P N-1 -100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.4 Dominique van de Werve -Marie Laure Peterbroeck 57,39 %
13 NS 2S N+1 150 18 81.82
14 NS 1S N-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.3 Jacques Podevyn -Helene Christiaens 39,77 %
15 NS 2T W+4 -170 22 100.00
16 NS 3C S = 140 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 100,00 %
a.2 Catherine de Moffarts -Anne Arsac 48,11 %
17 NS 2P S+1 140 16 72.73
18 NS 3T W-1 50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 45,83 %
19 NS 2S N = 120 15 68.18
20 NS 1S E-1 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a12 Serge Alard -Francoise Turin 49,81 %
23 NS 1S E = -90 6 27.27
24 NS 4S E+1 -460 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a11 Nadine Brabant -Pascale Bodart 48,48 %
25 NS 1S S-2 -100 18 81.82
26 NS 2P N-1 -100 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
Total : 279,0 / 528 = 52,84 %
PAIRE A.2 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne
a.2 Catherine de Moffarts -Anne Arsac 48,11 %
3 NS 4P W+1 -650 5 22.73
4 NS 1S W+1 -120 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
a.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 45,83 %
5 NS 4C W-1 50 17 77.27
6 NS 3P N+1 170 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a13 Elisabeth Harmant -Claire Destin 47,73 %
7 NS 2C W+1 -140 9 40.91
8 NS 4P S = 420 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a12 Serge Alard -Francoise Turin 49,81 %
9 NS 6P N-1 -50 2 9.09
10 NS 3S W = -600 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a11 Nadine Brabant -Pascale Bodart 48,48 %
11 NS 2P N-1 -50 8 36.36
12 NS 4PcN = 790 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a10 Jean de Villenfagne -Dilva Haym 53,41 %
13 NS 2K N = 90 8 36.36
14 NS 1S N-1 -50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a.9 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 60,42 %
15 NS 3S E+3 -490 6 27.27
16 NS 4CcS-1 -100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.8 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 48,11 %
17 NS 3P S-1 -50 7 31.82
18 NS 2S E-3 150 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a.7 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 53,98 %
19 NS 2S N = 120 15 68.18
20 NS 1S E-1 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.6 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon 46,78 %
21 NS 3P S-1 -100 2 9.09
22 NS 4P N-1 -50 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
a.5 Dominique Sassen -Nicole Leclere 50,19 %
23 NS 1S E-1 100 12 54.55
24 NS 3S W+2 -460 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.4 Dominique van de Werve -Marie Laure Peterbroeck 57,39 %
25 NS 3T N-1 -50 20 90.91
26 NS 2C S-1 -100 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
Total : 263,0 / 528 = 49,81 %
PAIRE A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary
a.7 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 53,98 %
1 NS 4C S = 420 12 54.55
2 NS 1K E-1 50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.6 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon 46,78 %
3 NS 4C W+1 -650 5 22.73
4 NS 3T N+1 130 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.4 Dominique van de Werve -Marie Laure Peterbroeck 57,39 %
7 NS 2T S+1 110 22 100.00
8 NS 4P S-1 -50 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.3 Jacques Podevyn -Helene Christiaens 39,77 %
9 NS 4P N+2 480 17 77.27
10 NS 3S W+1 -630 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a.2 Catherine de Moffarts -Anne Arsac 48,11 %
11 NS 2P N = 110 16 72.73
12 NS 6PcN-2 -500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 45,83 %
13 NS 1CcW-1 200 20 90.91
14 NS 1S N-1 -50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a13 Elisabeth Harmant -Claire Destin 47,73 %
15 NS 3S W+1 -430 12 54.55
16 NS 4PcN-4 -800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a12 Serge Alard -Francoise Turin 49,81 %
17 NS 2P S = 110 12 54.55
18 NS 2CcN = 670 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a11 Nadine Brabant -Pascale Bodart 48,48 %
19 NS 2S N = 120 15 68.18
20 NS 1S E = -90 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a10 Jean de Villenfagne -Dilva Haym 53,41 %
21 NS 4P S = 620 13 59.09
22 NS 3S N+1 430 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a.9 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 60,42 %
23 NS 1S E+3 -180 0 0.00
24 NS 3S E+3 -490 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
a.8 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 48,11 %
25 NS 1S E+2 -150 2 9.09
26 NS 4C S-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 4,55 %
Total : 250,0 / 528 = 47,35 %
PAIRE A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Marie J. de Wagheneire
a.9 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 60,42 %
1 NS 5K N = 400 7 31.82
2 NS 1K E = -70 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a.8 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 48,11 %
3 NS 4P W = -620 16 72.73
4 NS 2C E-1 100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.7 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 53,98 %
5 NS 4C W = -420 6 27.27
6 NS 3S S-3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
a.5 Dominique Sassen -Nicole Leclere 50,19 %
9 NS 4P N+3 510 20 90.91
10 NS 3S W+2 -660 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.4 Dominique van de Werve -Marie Laure Peterbroeck 57,39 %
11 NS 3P N-2 -100 2 9.09
12 NS 4P S = 620 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.3 Jacques Podevyn -Helene Christiaens 39,77 %
13 NS 2S N = 120 15 68.18
14 NS 1S N = 90 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a.2 Catherine de Moffarts -Anne Arsac 48,11 %
15 NS 4KcN-4 -1100 0 0.00
16 NS 4C S-1 -50 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 45,83 %
17 NS 4P S-1 -50 7 31.82
18 NS 3P W-1 50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a13 Elisabeth Harmant -Claire Destin 47,73 %
19 NS 3P W-1 100 4 18.18
20 NS 1S E-1 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a12 Serge Alard -Francoise Turin 49,81 %
21 NS 3S N+1 630 21 95.45
22 NS 4P N = 420 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
a11 Nadine Brabant -Pascale Bodart 48,48 %
23 NS 1S E = -90 6 27.27
24 NS 3S E+4 -520 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a10 Jean de Villenfagne -Dilva Haym 53,41 %
25 NS 2S E = -120 11 50.00
26 NS 2C N = 110 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
Total : 248,0 / 528 = 46,97 %
PAIRE A.8 Michele Verhulst -Claire de Quirini
a.2 Catherine de Moffarts -Anne Arsac 48,11 %
1 NS 3S N+3 490 21 95.45
2 NS 1K E-1 50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 45,83 %
3 NS 4P W+1 -650 5 22.73
4 NS 1S W-2 200 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a13 Elisabeth Harmant -Claire Destin 47,73 %
5 NS 5C W-1 50 17 77.27
6 NS 3P N+1 170 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a12 Serge Alard -Francoise Turin 49,81 %
7 NS 2C W = -110 18 81.82
8 NS 4P S+1 450 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
a11 Nadine Brabant -Pascale Bodart 48,48 %
9 NS 4P N+1 450 10 45.45
10 NS 3S W+2 -660 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a10 Jean de Villenfagne -Dilva Haym 53,41 %
11 NS 3PcN-2 -300 0 0.00
12 NS 2C E = -110 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 6,82 %
a.8 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 48,11 %
15 NS 3S E+2 -460 9 40.91
16 NS 2S W+3 -210 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a.7 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 53,98 %
17 NS 3P S-1 -50 7 31.82
18 NS 2P E = -110 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a.6 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon 46,78 %
19 NS 2S N = 120 15 68.18
20 NS 1S E-1 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.5 Dominique Sassen -Nicole Leclere 50,19 %
21 NS 3S N+1 630 21 95.45
22 NS 4C N-2 -100 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.4 Dominique van de Werve -Marie Laure Peterbroeck 57,39 %
23 NS 1S E+1 -120 2 9.09
24 NS 3S W+2 -460 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.3 Jacques Podevyn -Helene Christiaens 39,77 %
25 NS 1S E+2 -150 2 9.09
26 NS 1S W+2 -150 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
Total : 246,0 / 528 = 46,59 %
PAIRE A13 Regine de Hemptinne -Michou van Wetter
a12 Serge Alard -Francoise Turin 49,81 %
1 NS 5K S-1 -50 2 9.09
2 NS 1K E-1 50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a11 Nadine Brabant -Pascale Bodart 48,48 %
3 NS 4P W+1 -650 5 22.73
4 NS 1S W-3 300 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a10 Jean de Villenfagne -Dilva Haym 53,41 %
5 NS 4C W = -420 6 27.27
6 NS 3P N-1 -50 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.9 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 60,42 %
7 NS 2C W+1 -140 9 40.91
8 NS 4P S-1 -50 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a.8 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 48,11 %
9 NS 4P N+1 450 10 45.45
10 NS 3S W = -600 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.7 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 53,98 %
11 NS 3C E-4 200 22 100.00
12 NS 2C E = -110 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a.6 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon 46,78 %
13 NS 1S N = 90 8 36.36
14 NS 1S N-1 -50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a.5 Dominique Sassen -Nicole Leclere 50,19 %
15 NS 5T W = -400 19 86.36
16 NS 4CcS-1 -100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
a.4 Dominique van de Werve -Marie Laure Peterbroeck 57,39 %
17 NS 2P S+1 140 16 72.73
18 NS 4CcN-4 -1100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.3 Jacques Podevyn -Helene Christiaens 39,77 %
19 NS 2S N = 120 15 68.18
20 NS 2C W-1 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.2 Catherine de Moffarts -Anne Arsac 48,11 %
21 NS 1P S+3 170 6 27.27
22 NS 3C N-1 -50 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a13 Elisabeth Harmant -Claire Destin 47,73 %
25 NS 1S E+2 -150 2 9.09
26 NS 2K E+2 -130 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
Total : 230,0 / 528 = 43,56 %
PAIRE A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten
a11 Nadine Brabant -Pascale Bodart 48,48 %
1 NS 3S N+3 490 21 95.45
2 NS 3T S-3 -300 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a10 Jean de Villenfagne -Dilva Haym 53,41 %
3 NS 3S E = -600 22 100.00
4 NS 2P E-1 100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.9 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 60,42 %
5 NS 4C W = -420 6 27.27
6 NS 3P N+1 170 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.8 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 48,11 %
7 NS 2C W+1 -140 9 40.91
8 NS 4P S-1 -50 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a.6 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon 46,78 %
11 NS 2P N-1 -50 8 36.36
12 NS 4P N = 620 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a.5 Dominique Sassen -Nicole Leclere 50,19 %
13 NS 2S N-1 -100 0 0.00
14 NS 1S N-1 -50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
a.4 Dominique van de Werve -Marie Laure Peterbroeck 57,39 %
15 NS 3S W+2 -460 9 40.91
16 NS 5K E = -600 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a.3 Jacques Podevyn -Helene Christiaens 39,77 %
17 NS 3S S+1 430 22 100.00
18 NS 3P W = -140 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a.2 Catherine de Moffarts -Anne Arsac 48,11 %
19 NS 3K E-1 100 4 18.18
20 NS 1S E-3 300 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 45,83 %
21 NS 4P S = 620 13 59.09
22 NS 4C N-2 -100 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a13 Elisabeth Harmant -Claire Destin 47,73 %
23 NS 1S E-1 100 12 54.55
24 NS 6S E = -990 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a12 Serge Alard -Francoise Turin 49,81 %
25 NS 2K E+2 -130 7 31.82
26 NS 3K E+1 -130 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
Total : 223,0 / 528 = 42,23 %
PAIRE A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Annie Legrand
a.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert 45,83 %
1 NS 6S N-1 -50 2 9.09
2 NS 2S N-1 -100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
a13 Elisabeth Harmant -Claire Destin 47,73 %
3 NS 4P W = -620 16 72.73
4 NS 1S W-1 100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a12 Serge Alard -Francoise Turin 49,81 %
5 NS 4C W = -420 6 27.27
6 NS 4P N-2 -100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
a11 Nadine Brabant -Pascale Bodart 48,48 %
7 NS 2C W+2 -170 2 9.09
8 NS 4P S = 420 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a10 Jean de Villenfagne -Dilva Haym 53,41 %
9 NS 4P N+1 450 10 45.45
10 NS 3S W+2 -660 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.9 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 60,42 %
11 NS 2P N-1 -50 8 36.36
12 NS 3P S+1 170 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.8 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 48,11 %
13 NS 1S N = 90 8 36.36
14 NS 1S N = 90 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a.7 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 53,98 %
15 NS 5T W+1 -420 15 68.18
16 NS 3S W+2 -660 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a.6 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon 46,78 %
17 NS 3S S = 400 20 90.91
18 NS 3CcN-2 -500 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.5 Dominique Sassen -Nicole Leclere 50,19 %
19 NS 3K E-1 100 4 18.18
20 NS 1S E-1 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a.4 Dominique van de Werve -Marie Laure Peterbroeck 57,39 %
21 NS 3S N-2 -200 0 0.00
22 NS 4P N = 420 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a.3 Jacques Podevyn -Helene Christiaens 39,77 %
23 NS 1S E = -90 6 27.27
24 NS 3S E+2 -460 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
Total : 202,0 / 528 = 38,26 %
PAIRE a.9 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles
A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Marie J. de Wagheneire 46,97 %
1 EO 5K N = 400 15 68.18
2 EO 1K E = -70 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A12 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 52,84 %
3 EO 4P W+1 -650 17 77.27
4 EO 2P E-1 100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 42,23 %
5 EO 4C W = -420 16 72.73
6 EO 3P N+1 170 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A13 Regine de Hemptinne -Michou van Wetter 43,56 %
7 EO 2C W+1 -140 13 59.09
8 EO 4P S-1 -50 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 55,30 %
9 EO 4P N = 420 18 81.82
10 EO 3S W+2 -660 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Annie Legrand 38,26 %
11 EO 2P N-1 -50 14 63.64
12 EO 3P S+1 170 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.2 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 49,81 %
15 EO 3S E+3 -490 16 72.73
16 EO 4CcS-1 -100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.9 Philippe van der Gracht -Noelle Fosse 57,39 %
17 EO 4P S-1 -50 15 68.18
18 EO 3C N-3 -300 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 59,09 %
19 EO 2S N = 120 7 31.82
20 EO 2C W-3 300 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
A10 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 56,44 %
21 EO 4P S = 620 9 40.91
22 EO 4P N = 420 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary 47,35 %
23 EO 1S E+3 -180 22 100.00
24 EO 3S E+3 -490 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
A11 Didier Collart -Claire Derieuw 54,17 %
25 EO 1K E+2 -110 7 31.82
26 EO 2K E+2 -130 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
Total : 319,0 / 528 = 60,42 %
PAIRE a.4 Dominique van de Werve -Marie Laure Peterbroeck
A.9 Philippe van der Gracht -Noelle Fosse 57,39 %
1 EO 6S S-1 -50 20 90.91
2 EO 2S N = 120 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A10 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 56,44 %
5 EO 4C W = -420 16 72.73
6 EO 2P N+2 170 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary 47,35 %
7 EO 2T S+1 110 0 0.00
8 EO 4P S-1 -50 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A11 Didier Collart -Claire Derieuw 54,17 %
9 EO 4P N+1 450 12 54.55
10 EO 3S W+2 -660 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Marie J. de Wagheneire 46,97 %
11 EO 3P N-2 -100 20 90.91
12 EO 4P S = 620 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A12 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 52,84 %
13 EO 2S N+1 150 4 18.18
14 EO 1S N-2 -100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 42,23 %
15 EO 3S W+2 -460 13 59.09
16 EO 5K E = -600 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A13 Regine de Hemptinne -Michou van Wetter 43,56 %
17 EO 2P S+1 140 6 27.27
18 EO 4CcN-4 -1100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 55,30 %
19 EO 2S N-1 -50 22 100.00
20 EO 1S E-1 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Annie Legrand 38,26 %
21 EO 3S N-2 -200 22 100.00
22 EO 4P N = 420 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A.8 Michele Verhulst -Claire de Quirini 46,59 %
23 EO 1S E+1 -120 20 90.91
24 EO 3S W+2 -460 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.2 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 49,81 %
25 EO 3T N-1 -50 2 9.09
26 EO 2C S-1 -100 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
Total : 303,0 / 528 = 57,39 %
PAIRE a.7 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle
A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary 47,35 %
1 EO 4C S = 420 10 45.45
2 EO 1K E-1 50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A11 Didier Collart -Claire Derieuw 54,17 %
3 EO 4P W = -620 6 27.27
4 EO 1S W-1 100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Marie J. de Wagheneire 46,97 %
5 EO 4C W = -420 16 72.73
6 EO 3S S-3 -150 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
A12 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 52,84 %
7 EO 2P N-4 -400 22 100.00
8 EO 4P S-2 -100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 100,00 %
A13 Regine de Hemptinne -Michou van Wetter 43,56 %
11 EO 3C E-4 200 0 0.00
12 EO 2C E = -110 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 55,30 %
13 EO 1S N = 90 14 63.64
14 EO 1S N-1 -50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Annie Legrand 38,26 %
15 EO 5T W+1 -420 7 31.82
16 EO 3S W+2 -660 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A.8 Michele Verhulst -Claire de Quirini 46,59 %
17 EO 3P S-1 -50 15 68.18
18 EO 2P E = -110 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A.2 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 49,81 %
19 EO 2S N = 120 7 31.82
20 EO 1S E-1 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.9 Philippe van der Gracht -Noelle Fosse 57,39 %
21 EO 4P S = 620 9 40.91
22 EO 4C N = 420 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 59,09 %
23 EO 3T E-2 200 4 18.18
24 EO 3S W+2 -460 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A10 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 56,44 %
25 EO 1C N = 80 0 0.00
26 EO 2K E+1 -110 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
Total : 285,0 / 528 = 53,98 %
PAIRE a10 Jean de Villenfagne -Dilva Haym
A12 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 52,84 %
1 EO 3S N+1 430 6 27.27
2 EO 1K E-1 50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 42,23 %
3 EO 3S E = -600 0 0.00
4 EO 2P E-1 100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A13 Regine de Hemptinne -Michou van Wetter 43,56 %
5 EO 4C W = -420 16 72.73
6 EO 3P N-1 -50 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 55,30 %
7 EO 2K W+1 -110 4 18.18
8 EO 4P S = 420 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Annie Legrand 38,26 %
9 EO 4P N+1 450 12 54.55
10 EO 3S W+2 -660 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.8 Michele Verhulst -Claire de Quirini 46,59 %
11 EO 3PcN-2 -300 22 100.00
12 EO 2C E = -110 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 93,18 %
A.2 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 49,81 %
13 EO 2K N = 90 14 63.64
14 EO 1S N-1 -50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 59,09 %
17 EO 4P S-2 -100 21 95.45
18 EO 2S E-2 100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A10 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 56,44 %
19 EO 2S N = 120 7 31.82
20 EO 1S E = -90 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary 47,35 %
21 EO 4P S = 620 9 40.91
22 EO 3S N+1 430 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A11 Didier Collart -Claire Derieuw 54,17 %
23 EO 2P N = 110 6 27.27
24 EO 6S W = -990 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Marie J. de Wagheneire 46,97 %
25 EO 2S E = -120 11 50.00
26 EO 2C N = 110 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
Total : 282,0 / 528 = 53,41 %
PAIRE a.5 Dominique Sassen -Nicole Leclere
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 59,09 %
1 EO 4C S = 420 10 45.45
2 EO 2TcS-2 -500 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A10 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 56,44 %
3 EO 4P W = -620 6 27.27
4 EO 1S W-1 100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A11 Didier Collart -Claire Derieuw 54,17 %
7 EO 2C W+1 -140 13 59.09
8 EO 4P S = 420 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Marie J. de Wagheneire 46,97 %
9 EO 4P N+3 510 2 9.09
10 EO 3S W+2 -660 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A12 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 52,84 %
11 EO 2P N = 110 6 27.27
12 EO 4P N-1 -100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 42,23 %
13 EO 2S N-1 -100 22 100.00
14 EO 1S N-1 -50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
A13 Regine de Hemptinne -Michou van Wetter 43,56 %
15 EO 5T W = -400 3 13.64
16 EO 4CcS-1 -100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 55,30 %
17 EO 4P S-2 -100 21 95.45
18 EO 2S E-5 250 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Annie Legrand 38,26 %
19 EO 3K E-1 100 18 81.82
20 EO 1S E-1 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A.8 Michele Verhulst -Claire de Quirini 46,59 %
21 EO 3S N+1 630 1 4.55
22 EO 4C N-2 -100 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.2 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 49,81 %
23 EO 1S E-1 100 10 45.45
24 EO 3S W+2 -460 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.9 Philippe van der Gracht -Noelle Fosse 57,39 %
25 EO 2S E = -120 11 50.00
26 EO 2C N = 110 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
Total : 265,0 / 528 = 50,19 %
PAIRE a12 Serge Alard -Francoise Turin
A13 Regine de Hemptinne -Michou van Wetter 43,56 %
1 EO 5K S-1 -50 20 90.91
2 EO 1K E-1 50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 55,30 %
3 EO 4C E = -620 6 27.27
4 EO 2C E-1 100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Annie Legrand 38,26 %
5 EO 4C W = -420 16 72.73
6 EO 4P N-2 -100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
A.8 Michele Verhulst -Claire de Quirini 46,59 %
7 EO 2C W = -110 4 18.18
8 EO 4P S+1 450 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
A.2 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 49,81 %
9 EO 6P N-1 -50 20 90.91
10 EO 3S W = -600 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.9 Philippe van der Gracht -Noelle Fosse 57,39 %
11 EO 2P N = 110 6 27.27
12 EO 3P N+1 170 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 59,09 %
13 EO 1C W = -80 20 90.91
14 EO 1S N = 90 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A10 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 56,44 %
15 EO 3S W+4 -520 18 81.82
16 EO 5K E = -600 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary 47,35 %
17 EO 2P S = 110 10 45.45
18 EO 2CcN = 670 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Marie J. de Wagheneire 46,97 %
21 EO 3S N+1 630 1 4.55
22 EO 4P N = 420 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
A12 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 52,84 %
23 EO 1S E = -90 16 72.73
24 EO 4S E+1 -460 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 42,23 %
25 EO 2K E+2 -130 15 68.18
26 EO 3K E+1 -130 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
Total : 263,0 / 528 = 49,81 %
PAIRE a11 Nadine Brabant -Pascale Bodart
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 42,23 %
1 EO 3S N+3 490 1 4.55
2 EO 3T S-3 -300 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A13 Regine de Hemptinne -Michou van Wetter 43,56 %
3 EO 4P W+1 -650 17 77.27
4 EO 1S W-3 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 55,30 %
5 EO 4C W-1 50 5 22.73
6 EO 4P N+1 450 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Annie Legrand 38,26 %
7 EO 2C W+2 -170 20 90.91
8 EO 4P S = 420 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.8 Michele Verhulst -Claire de Quirini 46,59 %
9 EO 4P N+1 450 12 54.55
10 EO 3S W+2 -660 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.2 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 49,81 %
11 EO 2P N-1 -50 14 63.64
12 EO 4PcN = 790 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.9 Philippe van der Gracht -Noelle Fosse 57,39 %
13 EO 1S N = 90 14 63.64
14 EO 1S N-1 -50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 59,09 %
15 EO 5T W = -400 3 13.64
16 EO 4P N-3 -150 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary 47,35 %
19 EO 2S N = 120 7 31.82
20 EO 1S E = -90 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A11 Didier Collart -Claire Derieuw 54,17 %
21 EO 2T S+1 110 18 81.82
22 EO 4P N = 420 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Marie J. de Wagheneire 46,97 %
23 EO 1S E = -90 16 72.73
24 EO 3S E+4 -520 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A12 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 52,84 %
25 EO 1S S-2 -100 4 18.18
26 EO 2P N-1 -100 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
Total : 256,0 / 528 = 48,48 %
PAIRE a.2 Catherine de Moffarts -Anne Arsac
A.8 Michele Verhulst -Claire de Quirini 46,59 %
1 EO 3S N+3 490 1 4.55
2 EO 1K E-1 50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A.2 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 49,81 %
3 EO 4P W+1 -650 17 77.27
4 EO 1S W+1 -120 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
A.9 Philippe van der Gracht -Noelle Fosse 57,39 %
5 EO 6CcW-3 500 0 0.00
6 EO 3P N+2 200 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 6,82 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 59,09 %
7 EO 2C W+1 -140 13 59.09
8 EO 4P S = 420 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A10 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 56,44 %
9 EO 6P N-2 -100 22 100.00
10 EO 3S W+2 -660 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary 47,35 %
11 EO 2P N = 110 6 27.27
12 EO 6PcN-2 -500 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A11 Didier Collart -Claire Derieuw 54,17 %
13 EO 2S N = 120 7 31.82
14 EO 1S N = 90 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Marie J. de Wagheneire 46,97 %
15 EO 4KcN-4 -1100 22 100.00
16 EO 4C S-1 -50 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A12 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 52,84 %
17 EO 2P S+1 140 6 27.27
18 EO 3T W-1 50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 42,23 %
19 EO 3K E-1 100 18 81.82
20 EO 1S E-3 300 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A13 Regine de Hemptinne -Michou van Wetter 43,56 %
21 EO 1P S+3 170 16 72.73
22 EO 3C N-1 -50 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 55,30 %
23 EO 3T E-3 300 1 4.55
24 EO 5S E = -460 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
Total : 254,0 / 528 = 48,11 %
PAIRE a.8 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes
A11 Didier Collart -Claire Derieuw 54,17 %
1 EO 5K N+1 420 10 45.45
2 EO 4P W-2 100 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Marie J. de Wagheneire 46,97 %
3 EO 4P W = -620 6 27.27
4 EO 2C E-1 100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A12 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 52,84 %
5 EO 4C W = -420 16 72.73
6 EO 2P N+3 200 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 42,23 %
7 EO 2C W+1 -140 13 59.09
8 EO 4P S-1 -50 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A13 Regine de Hemptinne -Michou van Wetter 43,56 %
9 EO 4P N+1 450 12 54.55
10 EO 3S W = -600 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Annie Legrand 38,26 %
13 EO 1S N = 90 14 63.64
14 EO 1S N = 90 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A.8 Michele Verhulst -Claire de Quirini 46,59 %
15 EO 3S E+2 -460 13 59.09
16 EO 2S W+3 -210 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A.2 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 49,81 %
17 EO 3P S-1 -50 15 68.18
18 EO 2S E-3 150 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A.9 Philippe van der Gracht -Noelle Fosse 57,39 %
19 EO 2S N = 120 7 31.82
20 EO 1S E-1 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 59,09 %
21 EO 4P S = 620 9 40.91
22 EO 1P N+3 170 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A10 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 56,44 %
23 EO 1S E-3 300 1 4.55
24 EO 3S E+2 -460 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary 47,35 %
25 EO 1S E+2 -150 20 90.91
26 EO 4C S-2 -200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 95,45 %
Total : 254,0 / 528 = 48,11 %
PAIRE a13 Elisabeth Harmant -Claire Destin
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 55,30 %
1 EO 5K N = 400 15 68.18
2 EO 1K E-2 100 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Annie Legrand 38,26 %
3 EO 4P W = -620 6 27.27
4 EO 1S W-1 100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.8 Michele Verhulst -Claire de Quirini 46,59 %
5 EO 5C W-1 50 5 22.73
6 EO 3P N+1 170 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.2 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 49,81 %
7 EO 2C W+1 -140 13 59.09
8 EO 4P S = 420 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.9 Philippe van der Gracht -Noelle Fosse 57,39 %
9 EO 4P N+2 480 5 22.73
10 EO 3S W+2 -660 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 59,09 %
11 EO 2P N+1 140 2 9.09
12 EO 2C E-1 50 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A10 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 56,44 %
13 EO 1S W-3 300 0 0.00
14 EO 1S N+1 120 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary 47,35 %
15 EO 3S W+1 -430 10 45.45
16 EO 4PcN-4 -800 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A11 Didier Collart -Claire Derieuw 54,17 %
17 EO 3P S = 140 6 27.27
18 EO 2S E-2 100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Marie J. de Wagheneire 46,97 %
19 EO 3P W-1 100 18 81.82
20 EO 1S E-1 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 42,23 %
23 EO 1S E-1 100 10 45.45
24 EO 6S E = -990 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A13 Regine de Hemptinne -Michou van Wetter 43,56 %
25 EO 1S E+2 -150 20 90.91
26 EO 2K E+2 -130 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
Total : 252,0 / 528 = 47,73 %
PAIRE a.6 Pascale Graton -Roselyne Delpon
A10 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 56,44 %
1 EO 4C S+2 480 4 18.18
2 EO 4P W-1 50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary 47,35 %
3 EO 4C W+1 -650 17 77.27
4 EO 3T N+1 130 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A11 Didier Collart -Claire Derieuw 54,17 %
5 EO 4C W-1 50 5 22.73
6 EO 3P N = 140 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A12 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 52,84 %
9 EO 5P N = 450 12 54.55
10 EO 3S W+1 -630 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 42,23 %
11 EO 2P N-1 -50 14 63.64
12 EO 4P N = 620 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A13 Regine de Hemptinne -Michou van Wetter 43,56 %
13 EO 1S N = 90 14 63.64
14 EO 1S N-1 -50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 55,30 %
15 EO 6T W = -920 20 90.91
16 EO 4C S-2 -100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Annie Legrand 38,26 %
17 EO 3S S = 400 2 9.09
18 EO 3CcN-2 -500 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.8 Michele Verhulst -Claire de Quirini 46,59 %
19 EO 2S N = 120 7 31.82
20 EO 1S E-1 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.2 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 49,81 %
21 EO 3P S-1 -100 20 90.91
22 EO 4P N-1 -50 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
A.9 Philippe van der Gracht -Noelle Fosse 57,39 %
23 EO 1S E-1 100 10 45.45
24 EO 6S E-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 59,09 %
25 EO 3K E = -110 7 31.82
26 EO 2C N = 110 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
Total : 247,0 / 528 = 46,78 %
PAIRE a.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Jannick Bekaert
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Annie Legrand 38,26 %
1 EO 6S N-1 -50 20 90.91
2 EO 2S N-1 -100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
A.8 Michele Verhulst -Claire de Quirini 46,59 %
3 EO 4P W+1 -650 17 77.27
4 EO 1S W-2 200 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A.2 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 49,81 %
5 EO 4C W-1 50 5 22.73
6 EO 3P N+1 170 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.9 Philippe van der Gracht -Noelle Fosse 57,39 %
7 EO 2C W+1 -140 13 59.09
8 EO 4P S = 420 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 59,09 %
9 EO 6P N = 980 0 0.00
10 EO 3S W = -600 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 4,55 %
A10 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 56,44 %
11 EO 2P N-1 -50 14 63.64
12 EO 4P N = 620 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary 47,35 %
13 EO 1CcW-1 200 2 9.09
14 EO 1S N-1 -50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A11 Didier Collart -Claire Derieuw 54,17 %
15 EO 5T W+1 -420 7 31.82
16 EO 4K E+2 -170 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Marie J. de Wagheneire 46,97 %
17 EO 4P S-1 -50 15 68.18
18 EO 3P W-1 50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A12 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 52,84 %
19 EO 2S N = 120 7 31.82
20 EO 1S E-1 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 42,23 %
21 EO 4P S = 620 9 40.91
22 EO 4C N-2 -100 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 55,30 %
25 EO 2K E+2 -130 15 68.18
26 EO 2C N = 110 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
Total : 242,0 / 528 = 45,83 %
PAIRE a.3 Jacques Podevyn -Helene Christiaens
A.9 Philippe van der Gracht -Noelle Fosse 57,39 %
3 EO 4C E+1 -650 17 77.27
4 EO 3T N+1 130 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 59,09 %
5 EO 4C W = -420 16 72.73
6 EO 2P N+2 170 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A10 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 56,44 %
7 EO 2C W = -110 4 18.18
8 EO 4P S = 420 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Myriam de Timary 47,35 %
9 EO 4P N+2 480 5 22.73
10 EO 3S W+1 -630 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A11 Didier Collart -Claire Derieuw 54,17 %
11 EO 3P N-1 -50 14 63.64
12 EO 4P N = 620 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Marie J. de Wagheneire 46,97 %
13 EO 2S N = 120 7 31.82
14 EO 1S N = 90 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A12 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 52,84 %
15 EO 2T W+4 -170 0 0.00
16 EO 3C S = 140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 42,23 %
17 EO 3S S+1 430 0 0.00
18 EO 3P W = -140 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A13 Regine de Hemptinne -Michou van Wetter 43,56 %
19 EO 2S N = 120 7 31.82
20 EO 2C W-1 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Giuseppe Napoli 55,30 %
21 EO 4P S = 620 9 40.91
22 EO 1KcW-2 500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Annie Legrand 38,26 %
23 EO 1S E = -90 16 72.73
24 EO 3S E+2 -460 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.8 Michele Verhulst -Claire de Quirini 46,59 %
25 EO 1S E+2 -150 20 90.91
26 EO 1S W+2 -150 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
Total : 210,0 / 528 = 39,77 %
|