B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 67,23 A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles
--- 2 58,14 A.7 Hugo Baetens -Francis Rittweger
--- 3 54,17 A.5 Francoise Turin -Sylviane Delbeke
--- 4 53,98 A.9 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten
--- 5 53,22 A10 Eliane de Ceuninck -Yolande Waerseggers
--- 6 51,89 A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Mercedes Oostens
--- 7 51,33 A.8 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Marianne Borsu
--- 8 49,24 A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren
--- 9 45,45 A11 Michele Berrier -Teresa Dekoster
--- 10 45,08 A12 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart
--- 11 44,89 A.3 Claire Derieuw -Catherine de Moffarts
--- 12 42,80 A.4 Philippe van der Gracht -Fabienne Smit
--- 13 32,58 A13 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 61,36 a.4 Daniel Malarme -Denise Pel
--- 2 60,61 a.7 Michel Lahaut -Gerard Cooreman
--- 3 59,85 a.2 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee
--- 4 56,06 a11 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle
--- 5 55,87 a13 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire
--- 6 51,52 a.8 Colette Heerinckx -Michel Lievens
--- 7 49,43 a.5 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck
--- 8 47,92 a10 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed
--- 9 46,21 a.9 Bruno Quievy -Olivier Genin
--- 10 45,83 a.1 Nathalie de Laminne -Isabelle d'Aspremont
--- 11 43,56 a.6 Veronique Englebienne -Virginie Van Damme
--- 12 37,88 a.3 Pierina Di Vito -Manuela Meeus
--- 13 33,90 a12 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens
PAIRE A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles
a.2 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 59,85 %
3 NS 4C E = -620 10 45.45
4 NS 4C W-1 100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.1 Nathalie de Laminne -Isabelle d'Aspremont 45,83 %
5 NS 4P E-1 50 17 77.27
6 NS 6C N = 980 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a13 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 55,87 %
7 NS 3P W = -140 6 27.27
8 NS 4P E = -420 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a12 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 33,90 %
9 NS 3S N+3 490 21 95.45
10 NS 4P S = 620 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
a11 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 56,06 %
11 NS 3K N = 110 16 72.73
12 NS 4K E-3 150 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
a10 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 47,92 %
13 NS 4C S = 620 14 63.64
14 NS 4P W-1 50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.9 Bruno Quievy -Olivier Genin 46,21 %
15 NS 4P S = 620 12 54.55
16 NS 3P W+3 -230 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.8 Colette Heerinckx -Michel Lievens 51,52 %
17 NS 4P N = 420 13 59.09
18 NS 3P W-1 50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a.7 Michel Lahaut -Gerard Cooreman 60,61 %
19 NS 3S E+2 -660 4 18.18
20 NS 4C N = 620 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.6 Veronique Englebienne -Virginie Van Damme 43,56 %
21 NS 4P E-1 50 21 95.45
22 NS 4C E+1 -650 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.5 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 49,43 %
23 NS 3C W = -140 12 54.55
24 NS 3P W-4 200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.4 Daniel Malarme -Denise Pel 61,36 %
25 NS 2KcE-1 200 21 95.45
26 NS 4C S = 620 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
Total : 355,0 / 528 = 67,23 %
PAIRE A.7 Hugo Baetens -Francis Rittweger
a13 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 55,87 %
1 NS 5C E = -450 10 45.45
2 NS 6C S-1 -100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a12 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 33,90 %
3 NS 4C E = -620 10 45.45
4 NS 4C W-1 100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a11 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 56,06 %
5 NS 4P E-1 50 17 77.27
6 NS 6C N = 980 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a10 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 47,92 %
7 NS 3K S-1 -100 21 95.45
8 NS 3P E+1 -170 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
a.9 Bruno Quievy -Olivier Genin 46,21 %
9 NS 5S N = 460 14 63.64
10 NS 4P S = 620 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.7 Michel Lahaut -Gerard Cooreman 60,61 %
13 NS 4C S = 620 14 63.64
14 NS 4P E-1 50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.6 Veronique Englebienne -Virginie Van Damme 43,56 %
15 NS 4P S+1 650 22 100.00
16 NS 6S E-1 100 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 97,73 %
a.5 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 49,43 %
17 NS 4P N = 420 13 59.09
18 NS 3P W = -140 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.4 Daniel Malarme -Denise Pel 61,36 %
19 NS 3S W+2 -660 4 18.18
20 NS 3C S = 140 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a.3 Pierina Di Vito -Manuela Meeus 37,88 %
21 NS 4P E = -420 9 40.91
22 NS 4C E+1 -650 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.2 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 59,85 %
23 NS 3C E = -140 12 54.55
24 NS 4K W+1 -150 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.1 Nathalie de Laminne -Isabelle d'Aspremont 45,83 %
25 NS 3S E-1 100 15 68.18
26 NS 2C S+2 170 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 307,0 / 528 = 58,14 %
PAIRE A.5 Francoise Turin -Sylviane Delbeke
a.9 Bruno Quievy -Olivier Genin 46,21 %
1 NS 3S W-1 50 22 100.00
2 NS 4C S+1 650 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
a.8 Colette Heerinckx -Michel Lievens 51,52 %
3 NS 4C E = -620 10 45.45
4 NS 4C W-1 100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.7 Michel Lahaut -Gerard Cooreman 60,61 %
5 NS 4P E = -420 4 18.18
6 NS 4C N+2 480 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a.5 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 49,43 %
9 NS 3S N+2 460 14 63.64
10 NS 4P S = 620 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.4 Daniel Malarme -Denise Pel 61,36 %
11 NS 3K N = 110 16 72.73
12 NS 3S W+1 -430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.3 Pierina Di Vito -Manuela Meeus 37,88 %
13 NS 4C S+1 650 22 100.00
14 NS 3P W-1 50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.2 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 59,85 %
15 NS 4P S-2 -200 1 4.55
16 NS 6P W = -1430 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
a.1 Nathalie de Laminne -Isabelle d'Aspremont 45,83 %
17 NS 4P N = 420 13 59.09
18 NS 5K E-2 100 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a13 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 55,87 %
19 NS 4P W = -620 18 81.82
20 NS 3C S+1 170 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a12 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 33,90 %
21 NS 4P E-1 50 21 95.45
22 NS 4C E+1 -650 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a11 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 56,06 %
23 NS 3S N-4 -400 1 4.55
24 NS 5K W = -400 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
a10 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 47,92 %
25 NS 3S E+1 -630 7 31.82
26 NS 4C S = 620 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 286,0 / 528 = 54,17 %
PAIRE A.9 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten
a.4 Daniel Malarme -Denise Pel 61,36 %
1 NS 3S W+2 -460 4 18.18
2 NS 4C S+2 680 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.3 Pierina Di Vito -Manuela Meeus 37,88 %
3 NS 2C W+2 -170 20 90.91
4 NS 4C W = -620 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.2 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 59,85 %
5 NS 4P E = -420 4 18.18
6 NS 6C N-1 -50 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
a.1 Nathalie de Laminne -Isabelle d'Aspremont 45,83 %
7 NS 2P W+1 -140 6 27.27
8 NS 3P E = -140 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a13 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 55,87 %
9 NS 3S N+2 460 14 63.64
10 NS 4P S = 620 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a12 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 33,90 %
11 NS 3C S+2 200 22 100.00
12 NS 2C E = -110 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
a11 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 56,06 %
13 NS 4C S = 620 14 63.64
14 NS 4P W-1 50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.9 Bruno Quievy -Olivier Genin 46,21 %
17 NS 4P N = 420 13 59.09
18 NS 4P W-1 50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a.8 Colette Heerinckx -Michel Lievens 51,52 %
19 NS 3S E+1 -630 12 54.55
20 NS 2C S+1 140 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.7 Michel Lahaut -Gerard Cooreman 60,61 %
21 NS 4P E = -420 9 40.91
22 NS 4C E+2 -680 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a.6 Veronique Englebienne -Virginie Van Damme 43,56 %
23 NS 2S N-3 -300 5 22.73
24 NS 3P W-3 150 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a.5 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 49,43 %
25 NS 3S E-1 100 15 68.18
26 NS 4C S = 620 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
Total : 285,0 / 528 = 53,98 %
PAIRE A10 Eliane de Ceuninck -Yolande Waerseggers
a.6 Veronique Englebienne -Virginie Van Damme 43,56 %
1 NS 3PcN-2 -300 18 81.82
2 NS 6C S-1 -100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.5 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 49,43 %
3 NS 3C W = -140 22 100.00
4 NS 4C W-1 100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
a.4 Daniel Malarme -Denise Pel 61,36 %
5 NS 3S W = -400 10 45.45
6 NS 4C S+2 480 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a.3 Pierina Di Vito -Manuela Meeus 37,88 %
7 NS 2P W = -110 15 68.18
8 NS 2P E+2 -170 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a.2 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 59,85 %
9 NS 3S N+2 460 14 63.64
10 NS 4P S = 620 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.1 Nathalie de Laminne -Isabelle d'Aspremont 45,83 %
11 NS 1S S = 90 11 50.00
12 NS 2P S-2 -200 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a13 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 55,87 %
13 NS 3S S = 600 5 22.73
14 NS 4P W-2 100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a12 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 33,90 %
15 NS 4P S = 620 12 54.55
16 NS 6T W = -1370 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a10 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 47,92 %
19 NS 3S E+1 -630 12 54.55
20 NS 4C S-1 -100 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a.9 Bruno Quievy -Olivier Genin 46,21 %
21 NS 4P E+1 -450 1 4.55
22 NS 4C E+1 -650 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a.8 Colette Heerinckx -Michel Lievens 51,52 %
23 NS 3C W-1 100 21 95.45
24 NS 4K W+1 -150 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
a.7 Michel Lahaut -Gerard Cooreman 60,61 %
25 NS 3S E+1 -630 7 31.82
26 NS 4C S-1 -100 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
Total : 281,0 / 528 = 53,22 %
PAIRE A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Mercedes Oostens
a.1 Nathalie de Laminne -Isabelle d'Aspremont 45,83 %
1 NS 4C E+1 -450 10 45.45
2 NS 6C S = 1430 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a13 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 55,87 %
3 NS 4C W = -620 10 45.45
4 NS 4C W = -620 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a12 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 33,90 %
5 NS 4P E-1 50 17 77.27
6 NS 3S S+3 490 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a11 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 56,06 %
7 NS 2P W = -110 15 68.18
8 NS 4P E = -420 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a10 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 47,92 %
9 NS 3S N+1 430 7 31.82
10 NS 4P S = 620 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.9 Bruno Quievy -Olivier Genin 46,21 %
11 NS 2S E-1 50 8 36.36
12 NS 1S W+3 -180 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.8 Colette Heerinckx -Michel Lievens 51,52 %
13 NS 4C S-1 -100 1 4.55
14 NS 4P W-1 50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a.7 Michel Lahaut -Gerard Cooreman 60,61 %
15 NS 4P S = 620 12 54.55
16 NS 6P W = -1430 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.6 Veronique Englebienne -Virginie Van Damme 43,56 %
17 NS 4P N+1 450 22 100.00
18 NS 2P W+2 -170 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.5 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 49,43 %
19 NS 4P W-1 100 21 95.45
20 NS 3C S = 140 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a.4 Daniel Malarme -Denise Pel 61,36 %
21 NS 4P E = -420 9 40.91
22 NS 4C E+1 -650 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.3 Pierina Di Vito -Manuela Meeus 37,88 %
23 NS 3C W-1 100 21 95.45
24 NS 3K W+2 -150 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
Total : 274,0 / 528 = 51,89 %
PAIRE A.8 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Marianne Borsu
a.2 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 59,85 %
1 NS 4C E+1 -450 10 45.45
2 NS 6C S-1 -100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.1 Nathalie de Laminne -Isabelle d'Aspremont 45,83 %
3 NS 4C W = -620 10 45.45
4 NS 4C W-1 100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a13 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 55,87 %
5 NS 4P E-1 50 17 77.27
6 NS 6C N = 980 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a12 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 33,90 %
7 NS 3K S-1 -100 21 95.45
8 NS 3P E+1 -170 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
a11 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 56,06 %
9 NS 3S N = 400 3 13.64
10 NS 4P S-1 -100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
a10 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 47,92 %
11 NS 1S S = 90 11 50.00
12 NS 2K W+2 -130 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.8 Colette Heerinckx -Michel Lievens 51,52 %
15 NS 4P S = 620 12 54.55
16 NS 2K E-1 100 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a.7 Michel Lahaut -Gerard Cooreman 60,61 %
17 NS 4P N-1 -50 2 9.09
18 NS 5K E-2 100 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.6 Veronique Englebienne -Virginie Van Damme 43,56 %
19 NS 3S W+2 -660 4 18.18
20 NS 4C S = 620 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.5 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 49,43 %
21 NS 4P E+1 -450 1 4.55
22 NS 4C E+1 -650 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a.4 Daniel Malarme -Denise Pel 61,36 %
23 NS 3T S-2 -200 8 36.36
24 NS 3S E = -400 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a.3 Pierina Di Vito -Manuela Meeus 37,88 %
25 NS 3S E+1 -630 7 31.82
26 NS 4C S = 620 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 271,0 / 528 = 51,33 %
PAIRE A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren
a11 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 56,06 %
1 NS 3S W+2 -460 4 18.18
2 NS 6C S-1 -100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a10 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 47,92 %
3 NS 4C E = -620 10 45.45
4 NS 4C W = -620 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.9 Bruno Quievy -Olivier Genin 46,21 %
5 NS 4P E-1 50 17 77.27
6 NS 6C N = 980 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.8 Colette Heerinckx -Michel Lievens 51,52 %
7 NS 2P W+1 -140 6 27.27
8 NS 3P E+1 -170 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.6 Veronique Englebienne -Virginie Van Damme 43,56 %
11 NS 2S S-1 -50 4 18.18
12 NS 2P S-2 -200 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a.5 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 49,43 %
13 NS 4C S = 620 14 63.64
14 NS 2P W+1 -140 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a.4 Daniel Malarme -Denise Pel 61,36 %
15 NS 4P S = 620 12 54.55
16 NS 4P W+2 -680 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.3 Pierina Di Vito -Manuela Meeus 37,88 %
17 NS 4P N = 420 13 59.09
18 NS 3K E+1 -130 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.2 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 59,85 %
19 NS 3S E+1 -630 12 54.55
20 NS 3C S+1 170 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a.1 Nathalie de Laminne -Isabelle d'Aspremont 45,83 %
21 NS 3P E+1 -170 18 81.82
22 NS 6C E-1 100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
a13 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 55,87 %
23 NS 3C W = -140 12 54.55
24 NS 5K W = -400 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a12 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 33,90 %
25 NS 3S E-1 100 15 68.18
26 NS 3C S+1 170 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 260,0 / 528 = 49,24 %
PAIRE A11 Michele Berrier -Teresa Dekoster
a.8 Colette Heerinckx -Michel Lievens 51,52 %
1 NS 3S W+1 -430 15 68.18
2 NS 6C S-1 -100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.7 Michel Lahaut -Gerard Cooreman 60,61 %
3 NS 4C E = -620 10 45.45
4 NS 4C W-1 100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.6 Veronique Englebienne -Virginie Van Damme 43,56 %
5 NS 4P E = -420 4 18.18
6 NS 6C N = 980 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.5 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 49,43 %
7 NS 2P W = -110 15 68.18
8 NS 4P E = -420 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.4 Daniel Malarme -Denise Pel 61,36 %
9 NS 3S N = 400 3 13.64
10 NS 6P S-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 6,82 %
a.3 Pierina Di Vito -Manuela Meeus 37,88 %
11 NS 2K N+3 150 20 90.91
12 NS 3T N = 110 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
a.2 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 59,85 %
13 NS 4C S = 620 14 63.64
14 NS 4P E-1 50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.1 Nathalie de Laminne -Isabelle d'Aspremont 45,83 %
15 NS 4P S = 620 12 54.55
16 NS 6P W = -1430 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a13 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 55,87 %
17 NS 5P N-1 -50 2 9.09
18 NS 4K E = -130 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a11 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 56,06 %
21 NS 3S E = -400 16 72.73
22 NS 4C E+2 -680 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a10 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 47,92 %
23 NS 2C E = -110 16 72.73
24 NS 5K E = -400 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.9 Bruno Quievy -Olivier Genin 46,21 %
25 NS 3S E+2 -660 1 4.55
26 NS 4C S = 620 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
Total : 240,0 / 528 = 45,45 %
PAIRE A12 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart
a10 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 47,92 %
1 NS 3S W+2 -460 4 18.18
2 NS 6C S = 1430 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.9 Bruno Quievy -Olivier Genin 46,21 %
3 NS 4C E = -620 10 45.45
4 NS 4C W-1 100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.8 Colette Heerinckx -Michel Lievens 51,52 %
5 NS 4P E = -420 4 18.18
6 NS 4C N+1 450 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
a.7 Michel Lahaut -Gerard Cooreman 60,61 %
7 NS 2P W = -110 15 68.18
8 NS 3P E+1 -170 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a.6 Veronique Englebienne -Virginie Van Damme 43,56 %
9 NS 3S N+1 430 7 31.82
10 NS 4P S-1 -100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a.5 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 49,43 %
11 NS 2P N = 110 16 72.73
12 NS 2C N-3 -300 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.4 Daniel Malarme -Denise Pel 61,36 %
13 NS 4C N = 620 14 63.64
14 NS 3K E-1 50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.3 Pierina Di Vito -Manuela Meeus 37,88 %
15 NS 4P S = 620 12 54.55
16 NS 5P W+1 -680 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.2 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 59,85 %
17 NS 4P N-1 -50 2 9.09
18 NS 4K E = -130 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.1 Nathalie de Laminne -Isabelle d'Aspremont 45,83 %
19 NS 3S E+1 -630 12 54.55
20 NS 4C S-1 -100 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a12 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 33,90 %
23 NS 3K S-1 -100 18 81.82
24 NS 4C N-2 -100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
a11 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 56,06 %
25 NS 3S E+1 -630 7 31.82
26 NS 4C S-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
Total : 238,0 / 528 = 45,08 %
PAIRE A.3 Claire Derieuw -Catherine de Moffarts
a.5 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 49,43 %
1 NS 4PcN-3 -500 0 0.00
2 NS 6C S = 1430 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.3 Pierina Di Vito -Manuela Meeus 37,88 %
5 NS 4P E-1 50 17 77.27
6 NS 6C N-1 -50 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.2 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 59,85 %
7 NS 3P W = -140 6 27.27
8 NS 2P E+2 -170 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.1 Nathalie de Laminne -Isabelle d'Aspremont 45,83 %
9 NS 3S N+2 460 14 63.64
10 NS 4P S-1 -100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a13 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 55,87 %
11 NS 1S S-1 -50 4 18.18
12 NS 2P S-3 -300 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
a12 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 33,90 %
13 NS 4C N = 620 14 63.64
14 NS 3K E-1 50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a11 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 56,06 %
15 NS 4P S = 620 12 54.55
16 NS 6S E = -1440 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a10 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 47,92 %
17 NS 4P N = 420 13 59.09
18 NS 4P W-1 50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a.9 Bruno Quievy -Olivier Genin 46,21 %
19 NS 4P W+2 -680 0 0.00
20 NS 4C S = 620 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.8 Colette Heerinckx -Michel Lievens 51,52 %
21 NS 4P E = -420 9 40.91
22 NS 4C E+1 -650 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.7 Michel Lahaut -Gerard Cooreman 60,61 %
23 NS 3S N-4 -400 1 4.55
24 NS 5K W = -400 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
a.6 Veronique Englebienne -Virginie Van Damme 43,56 %
25 NS 3S E-1 100 15 68.18
26 NS 4C S+1 650 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
Total : 237,0 / 528 = 44,89 %
PAIRE A.4 Philippe van der Gracht -Fabienne Smit
a.7 Michel Lahaut -Gerard Cooreman 60,61 %
1 NS 3S W+1 -430 15 68.18
2 NS 6C S-1 -100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.6 Veronique Englebienne -Virginie Van Damme 43,56 %
3 NS 4C W = -620 10 45.45
4 NS 4C W-1 100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.4 Daniel Malarme -Denise Pel 61,36 %
7 NS 5K S-4 -400 0 0.00
8 NS 4CcN-3 -500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.3 Pierina Di Vito -Manuela Meeus 37,88 %
9 NS 3S N+2 490 21 95.45
10 NS 4P S = 620 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
a.2 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 59,85 %
11 NS 2P N-1 -50 4 18.18
12 NS 2P S-3 -300 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
a.1 Nathalie de Laminne -Isabelle d'Aspremont 45,83 %
13 NS 4C S-1 -100 1 4.55
14 NS 3C E = -140 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 4,55 %
a13 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 55,87 %
15 NS 4P S = 620 12 54.55
16 NS 6P W = -1430 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a12 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 33,90 %
17 NS 4P N = 420 13 59.09
18 NS 3P W = -140 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a11 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 56,06 %
19 NS 3S E-1 100 21 95.45
20 NS 4C S = 620 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
a10 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 47,92 %
21 NS 4P E = -420 9 40.91
22 NS 4C E+1 -650 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.9 Bruno Quievy -Olivier Genin 46,21 %
23 NS 2S N-3 -300 5 22.73
24 NS 5K W = -400 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.8 Colette Heerinckx -Michel Lievens 51,52 %
25 NS 3S E-2 200 21 95.45
26 NS 4C S-1 -100 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
Total : 226,0 / 528 = 42,80 %
PAIRE A13 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne
a12 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 33,90 %
1 NS 4K E = -130 20 90.91
2 NS 6C S-1 -100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a11 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 56,06 %
3 NS 4C W+1 -650 0 0.00
4 NS 4C W-1 100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a10 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 47,92 %
5 NS 4P E = -420 4 18.18
6 NS 6C N = 980 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.9 Bruno Quievy -Olivier Genin 46,21 %
7 NS 2P W+1 -140 6 27.27
8 NS 2P E+2 -170 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.8 Colette Heerinckx -Michel Lievens 51,52 %
9 NS 5T N-1 -50 0 0.00
10 NS 3P S+1 170 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
a.7 Michel Lahaut -Gerard Cooreman 60,61 %
11 NS 3CcS-2 -300 0 0.00
12 NS 2C N-3 -300 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
a.6 Veronique Englebienne -Virginie Van Damme 43,56 %
13 NS 3S S = 600 5 22.73
14 NS 4P E-1 50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a.5 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 49,43 %
15 NS 4P S-2 -200 1 4.55
16 NS 6S E = -1440 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 4,55 %
a.4 Daniel Malarme -Denise Pel 61,36 %
17 NS 4P N = 420 13 59.09
18 NS 4P W = -420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a.3 Pierina Di Vito -Manuela Meeus 37,88 %
19 NS 3S E+1 -630 12 54.55
20 NS 3C S = 140 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.2 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 59,85 %
21 NS 4P E = -420 9 40.91
22 NS 4C E+2 -680 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a13 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 55,87 %
25 NS 3S E+2 -660 1 4.55
26 NS 4C S = 620 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
Total : 172,0 / 528 = 32,58 %
PAIRE a.4 Daniel Malarme -Denise Pel
A.9 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 53,98 %
1 EO 3S W+2 -460 18 81.82
2 EO 4C S+2 680 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A10 Eliane de Ceuninck -Yolande Waerseggers 53,22 %
5 EO 3S W = -400 12 54.55
6 EO 4C S+2 480 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A.4 Philippe van der Gracht -Fabienne Smit 42,80 %
7 EO 5K S-4 -400 22 100.00
8 EO 4CcN-3 -500 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 100,00 %
A11 Michele Berrier -Teresa Dekoster 45,45 %
9 EO 3S N = 400 19 86.36
10 EO 6P S-2 -200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 93,18 %
A.5 Francoise Turin -Sylviane Delbeke 54,17 %
11 EO 3K N = 110 6 27.27
12 EO 3S W+1 -430 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A12 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 45,08 %
13 EO 4C N = 620 8 36.36
14 EO 3K E-1 50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 49,24 %
15 EO 4P S = 620 10 45.45
16 EO 4P W+2 -680 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A13 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 32,58 %
17 EO 4P N = 420 9 40.91
18 EO 4P W = -420 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A.7 Hugo Baetens -Francis Rittweger 58,14 %
19 EO 3S W+2 -660 18 81.82
20 EO 3C S = 140 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Mercedes Oostens 51,89 %
21 EO 4P E = -420 13 59.09
22 EO 4C E+1 -650 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.8 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Marianne Borsu 51,33 %
23 EO 3T S-2 -200 14 63.64
24 EO 3S E = -400 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 67,23 %
25 EO 2KcE-1 200 1 4.55
26 EO 4C S = 620 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
Total : 324,0 / 528 = 61,36 %
PAIRE a.7 Michel Lahaut -Gerard Cooreman
A.4 Philippe van der Gracht -Fabienne Smit 42,80 %
1 EO 3S W+1 -430 7 31.82
2 EO 6C S-1 -100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A11 Michele Berrier -Teresa Dekoster 45,45 %
3 EO 4C E = -620 12 54.55
4 EO 4C W-1 100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.5 Francoise Turin -Sylviane Delbeke 54,17 %
5 EO 4P E = -420 18 81.82
6 EO 4C N+2 480 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A12 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 45,08 %
7 EO 2P W = -110 7 31.82
8 EO 3P E+1 -170 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A13 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 32,58 %
11 EO 3CcS-2 -300 22 100.00
12 EO 2C N-3 -300 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
A.7 Hugo Baetens -Francis Rittweger 58,14 %
13 EO 4C S = 620 8 36.36
14 EO 4P E-1 50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Mercedes Oostens 51,89 %
15 EO 4P S = 620 10 45.45
16 EO 6P W = -1430 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.8 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Marianne Borsu 51,33 %
17 EO 4P N-1 -50 20 90.91
18 EO 5K E-2 100 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 67,23 %
19 EO 3S E+2 -660 18 81.82
20 EO 4C N = 620 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.9 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 53,98 %
21 EO 4P E = -420 13 59.09
22 EO 4C E+2 -680 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A.3 Claire Derieuw -Catherine de Moffarts 44,89 %
23 EO 3S N-4 -400 21 95.45
24 EO 5K W = -400 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
A10 Eliane de Ceuninck -Yolande Waerseggers 53,22 %
25 EO 3S E+1 -630 15 68.18
26 EO 4C S-1 -100 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
Total : 320,0 / 528 = 60,61 %
PAIRE a.2 Benoit Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee
A.8 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Marianne Borsu 51,33 %
1 EO 4C E+1 -450 12 54.55
2 EO 6C S-1 -100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 67,23 %
3 EO 4C E = -620 12 54.55
4 EO 4C W-1 100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.9 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 53,98 %
5 EO 4P E = -420 18 81.82
6 EO 6C N-1 -50 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
A.3 Claire Derieuw -Catherine de Moffarts 44,89 %
7 EO 3P W = -140 16 72.73
8 EO 2P E+2 -170 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A10 Eliane de Ceuninck -Yolande Waerseggers 53,22 %
9 EO 3S N+2 460 8 36.36
10 EO 4P S = 620 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.4 Philippe van der Gracht -Fabienne Smit 42,80 %
11 EO 2P N-1 -50 18 81.82
12 EO 2P S-3 -300 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
A11 Michele Berrier -Teresa Dekoster 45,45 %
13 EO 4C S = 620 8 36.36
14 EO 4P E-1 50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.5 Francoise Turin -Sylviane Delbeke 54,17 %
15 EO 4P S-2 -200 21 95.45
16 EO 6P W = -1430 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
A12 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 45,08 %
17 EO 4P N-1 -50 20 90.91
18 EO 4K E = -130 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 49,24 %
19 EO 3S E+1 -630 10 45.45
20 EO 3C S+1 170 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A13 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 32,58 %
21 EO 4P E = -420 13 59.09
22 EO 4C E+2 -680 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A.7 Hugo Baetens -Francis Rittweger 58,14 %
23 EO 3C E = -140 10 45.45
24 EO 4K W+1 -150 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
Total : 316,0 / 528 = 59,85 %
PAIRE a11 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 49,24 %
1 EO 3S W+2 -460 18 81.82
2 EO 6C S-1 -100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A13 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 32,58 %
3 EO 4C W+1 -650 22 100.00
4 EO 4C W-1 100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A.7 Hugo Baetens -Francis Rittweger 58,14 %
5 EO 4P E-1 50 5 22.73
6 EO 6C N = 980 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Mercedes Oostens 51,89 %
7 EO 2P W = -110 7 31.82
8 EO 4P E = -420 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.8 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Marianne Borsu 51,33 %
9 EO 3S N = 400 19 86.36
10 EO 4P S-1 -100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 67,23 %
11 EO 3K N = 110 6 27.27
12 EO 4K E-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
A.9 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 53,98 %
13 EO 4C S = 620 8 36.36
14 EO 4P W-1 50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.3 Claire Derieuw -Catherine de Moffarts 44,89 %
15 EO 4P S = 620 10 45.45
16 EO 6S E = -1440 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A.4 Philippe van der Gracht -Fabienne Smit 42,80 %
19 EO 3S E-1 100 1 4.55
20 EO 4C S = 620 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
A11 Michele Berrier -Teresa Dekoster 45,45 %
21 EO 3S E = -400 6 27.27
22 EO 4C E+2 -680 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.5 Francoise Turin -Sylviane Delbeke 54,17 %
23 EO 3S N-4 -400 21 95.45
24 EO 5K W = -400 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
A12 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 45,08 %
25 EO 3S E+1 -630 15 68.18
26 EO 4C S-2 -200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
Total : 296,0 / 528 = 56,06 %
PAIRE a13 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire
A.7 Hugo Baetens -Francis Rittweger 58,14 %
1 EO 5C E = -450 12 54.55
2 EO 6C S-1 -100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Mercedes Oostens 51,89 %
3 EO 4C W = -620 12 54.55
4 EO 4C W = -620 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.8 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Marianne Borsu 51,33 %
5 EO 4P E-1 50 5 22.73
6 EO 6C N = 980 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 67,23 %
7 EO 3P W = -140 16 72.73
8 EO 4P E = -420 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.9 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 53,98 %
9 EO 3S N+2 460 8 36.36
10 EO 4P S = 620 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.3 Claire Derieuw -Catherine de Moffarts 44,89 %
11 EO 1S S-1 -50 18 81.82
12 EO 2P S-3 -300 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
A10 Eliane de Ceuninck -Yolande Waerseggers 53,22 %
13 EO 3S S = 600 17 77.27
14 EO 4P W-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.4 Philippe van der Gracht -Fabienne Smit 42,80 %
15 EO 4P S = 620 10 45.45
16 EO 6P W = -1430 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A11 Michele Berrier -Teresa Dekoster 45,45 %
17 EO 5P N-1 -50 20 90.91
18 EO 4K E = -130 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.5 Francoise Turin -Sylviane Delbeke 54,17 %
19 EO 4P W = -620 4 18.18
20 EO 3C S+1 170 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 49,24 %
23 EO 3C W = -140 10 45.45
24 EO 5K W = -400 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A13 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 32,58 %
25 EO 3S E+2 -660 21 95.45
26 EO 4C S = 620 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
Total : 295,0 / 528 = 55,87 %
PAIRE a.8 Colette Heerinckx -Michel Lievens
A11 Michele Berrier -Teresa Dekoster 45,45 %
1 EO 3S W+1 -430 7 31.82
2 EO 6C S-1 -100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.5 Francoise Turin -Sylviane Delbeke 54,17 %
3 EO 4C E = -620 12 54.55
4 EO 4C W-1 100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A12 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 45,08 %
5 EO 4P E = -420 18 81.82
6 EO 4C N+1 450 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 49,24 %
7 EO 2P W+1 -140 16 72.73
8 EO 3P E+1 -170 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A13 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 32,58 %
9 EO 5T N-1 -50 22 100.00
10 EO 3P S+1 170 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Mercedes Oostens 51,89 %
13 EO 4C S-1 -100 21 95.45
14 EO 4P W-1 50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A.8 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Marianne Borsu 51,33 %
15 EO 4P S = 620 10 45.45
16 EO 2K E-1 100 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 67,23 %
17 EO 4P N = 420 9 40.91
18 EO 3P W-1 50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.9 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 53,98 %
19 EO 3S E+1 -630 10 45.45
20 EO 2C S+1 140 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.3 Claire Derieuw -Catherine de Moffarts 44,89 %
21 EO 4P E = -420 13 59.09
22 EO 4C E+1 -650 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A10 Eliane de Ceuninck -Yolande Waerseggers 53,22 %
23 EO 3C W-1 100 1 4.55
24 EO 4K W+1 -150 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
A.4 Philippe van der Gracht -Fabienne Smit 42,80 %
25 EO 3S E-2 200 1 4.55
26 EO 4C S-1 -100 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
Total : 272,0 / 528 = 51,52 %
PAIRE a.5 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck
A.3 Claire Derieuw -Catherine de Moffarts 44,89 %
1 EO 4PcN-3 -500 22 100.00
2 EO 6C S = 1430 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A10 Eliane de Ceuninck -Yolande Waerseggers 53,22 %
3 EO 3C W = -140 0 0.00
4 EO 4C W-1 100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
A11 Michele Berrier -Teresa Dekoster 45,45 %
7 EO 2P W = -110 7 31.82
8 EO 4P E = -420 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.5 Francoise Turin -Sylviane Delbeke 54,17 %
9 EO 3S N+2 460 8 36.36
10 EO 4P S = 620 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A12 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 45,08 %
11 EO 2P N = 110 6 27.27
12 EO 2C N-3 -300 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 49,24 %
13 EO 4C S = 620 8 36.36
14 EO 2P W+1 -140 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A13 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 32,58 %
15 EO 4P S-2 -200 21 95.45
16 EO 6S E = -1440 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 95,45 %
A.7 Hugo Baetens -Francis Rittweger 58,14 %
17 EO 4P N = 420 9 40.91
18 EO 3P W = -140 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Mercedes Oostens 51,89 %
19 EO 4P W-1 100 1 4.55
20 EO 3C S = 140 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.8 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Marianne Borsu 51,33 %
21 EO 4P E+1 -450 21 95.45
22 EO 4C E+1 -650 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 67,23 %
23 EO 3C W = -140 10 45.45
24 EO 3P W-4 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.9 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 53,98 %
25 EO 3S E-1 100 7 31.82
26 EO 4C S = 620 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
Total : 261,0 / 528 = 49,43 %
PAIRE a10 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed
A12 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 45,08 %
1 EO 3S W+2 -460 18 81.82
2 EO 6C S = 1430 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 49,24 %
3 EO 4C E = -620 12 54.55
4 EO 4C W = -620 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A13 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 32,58 %
5 EO 4P E = -420 18 81.82
6 EO 6C N = 980 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.7 Hugo Baetens -Francis Rittweger 58,14 %
7 EO 3K S-1 -100 1 4.55
8 EO 3P E+1 -170 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Mercedes Oostens 51,89 %
9 EO 3S N+1 430 15 68.18
10 EO 4P S = 620 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.8 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Marianne Borsu 51,33 %
11 EO 1S S = 90 11 50.00
12 EO 2K W+2 -130 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 67,23 %
13 EO 4C S = 620 8 36.36
14 EO 4P W-1 50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.3 Claire Derieuw -Catherine de Moffarts 44,89 %
17 EO 4P N = 420 9 40.91
18 EO 4P W-1 50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A10 Eliane de Ceuninck -Yolande Waerseggers 53,22 %
19 EO 3S E+1 -630 10 45.45
20 EO 4C S-1 -100 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A.4 Philippe van der Gracht -Fabienne Smit 42,80 %
21 EO 4P E = -420 13 59.09
22 EO 4C E+1 -650 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A11 Michele Berrier -Teresa Dekoster 45,45 %
23 EO 2C E = -110 6 27.27
24 EO 5K E = -400 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.5 Francoise Turin -Sylviane Delbeke 54,17 %
25 EO 3S E+1 -630 15 68.18
26 EO 4C S = 620 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 253,0 / 528 = 47,92 %
PAIRE a.9 Bruno Quievy -Olivier Genin
A.5 Francoise Turin -Sylviane Delbeke 54,17 %
1 EO 3S W-1 50 0 0.00
2 EO 4C S+1 650 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
A12 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 45,08 %
3 EO 4C E = -620 12 54.55
4 EO 4C W-1 100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 49,24 %
5 EO 4P E-1 50 5 22.73
6 EO 6C N = 980 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A13 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 32,58 %
7 EO 2P W+1 -140 16 72.73
8 EO 2P E+2 -170 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.7 Hugo Baetens -Francis Rittweger 58,14 %
9 EO 5S N = 460 8 36.36
10 EO 4P S = 620 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Mercedes Oostens 51,89 %
11 EO 2S E-1 50 14 63.64
12 EO 1S W+3 -180 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 67,23 %
15 EO 4P S = 620 10 45.45
16 EO 3P W+3 -230 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.9 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 53,98 %
17 EO 4P N = 420 9 40.91
18 EO 4P W-1 50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.3 Claire Derieuw -Catherine de Moffarts 44,89 %
19 EO 4P W+2 -680 22 100.00
20 EO 4C S = 620 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A10 Eliane de Ceuninck -Yolande Waerseggers 53,22 %
21 EO 4P E+1 -450 21 95.45
22 EO 4C E+1 -650 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A.4 Philippe van der Gracht -Fabienne Smit 42,80 %
23 EO 2S N-3 -300 17 77.27
24 EO 5K W = -400 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A11 Michele Berrier -Teresa Dekoster 45,45 %
25 EO 3S E+2 -660 21 95.45
26 EO 4C S = 620 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
Total : 244,0 / 528 = 46,21 %
PAIRE a.1 Nathalie de Laminne -Isabelle d'Aspremont
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Mercedes Oostens 51,89 %
1 EO 4C E+1 -450 12 54.55
2 EO 6C S = 1430 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.8 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Marianne Borsu 51,33 %
3 EO 4C W = -620 12 54.55
4 EO 4C W-1 100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 67,23 %
5 EO 4P E-1 50 5 22.73
6 EO 6C N = 980 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.9 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 53,98 %
7 EO 2P W+1 -140 16 72.73
8 EO 3P E = -140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.3 Claire Derieuw -Catherine de Moffarts 44,89 %
9 EO 3S N+2 460 8 36.36
10 EO 4P S-1 -100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A10 Eliane de Ceuninck -Yolande Waerseggers 53,22 %
11 EO 1S S = 90 11 50.00
12 EO 2P S-2 -200 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.4 Philippe van der Gracht -Fabienne Smit 42,80 %
13 EO 4C S-1 -100 21 95.45
14 EO 3C E = -140 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 95,45 %
A11 Michele Berrier -Teresa Dekoster 45,45 %
15 EO 4P S = 620 10 45.45
16 EO 6P W = -1430 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.5 Francoise Turin -Sylviane Delbeke 54,17 %
17 EO 4P N = 420 9 40.91
18 EO 5K E-2 100 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A12 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 45,08 %
19 EO 3S E+1 -630 10 45.45
20 EO 4C S-1 -100 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 49,24 %
21 EO 3P E+1 -170 4 18.18
22 EO 6C E-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
A.7 Hugo Baetens -Francis Rittweger 58,14 %
25 EO 3S E-1 100 7 31.82
26 EO 2C S+2 170 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 242,0 / 528 = 45,83 %
PAIRE a.6 Veronique Englebienne -Virginie Van Damme
A10 Eliane de Ceuninck -Yolande Waerseggers 53,22 %
1 EO 3PcN-2 -300 4 18.18
2 EO 6C S-1 -100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.4 Philippe van der Gracht -Fabienne Smit 42,80 %
3 EO 4C W = -620 12 54.55
4 EO 4C W-1 100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A11 Michele Berrier -Teresa Dekoster 45,45 %
5 EO 4P E = -420 18 81.82
6 EO 6C N = 980 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A12 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 45,08 %
9 EO 3S N+1 430 15 68.18
10 EO 4P S-1 -100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 49,24 %
11 EO 2S S-1 -50 18 81.82
12 EO 2P S-2 -200 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A13 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 32,58 %
13 EO 3S S = 600 17 77.27
14 EO 4P E-1 50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A.7 Hugo Baetens -Francis Rittweger 58,14 %
15 EO 4P S+1 650 0 0.00
16 EO 6S E-1 100 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 2,27 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Mercedes Oostens 51,89 %
17 EO 4P N+1 450 0 0.00
18 EO 2P W+2 -170 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.8 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Marianne Borsu 51,33 %
19 EO 3S W+2 -660 18 81.82
20 EO 4C S = 620 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 67,23 %
21 EO 4P E-1 50 1 4.55
22 EO 4C E+1 -650 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.9 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 53,98 %
23 EO 2S N-3 -300 17 77.27
24 EO 3P W-3 150 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A.3 Claire Derieuw -Catherine de Moffarts 44,89 %
25 EO 3S E-1 100 7 31.82
26 EO 4C S+1 650 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
Total : 230,0 / 528 = 43,56 %
PAIRE a.3 Pierina Di Vito -Manuela Meeus
A.9 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 53,98 %
3 EO 2C W+2 -170 2 9.09
4 EO 4C W = -620 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.3 Claire Derieuw -Catherine de Moffarts 44,89 %
5 EO 4P E-1 50 5 22.73
6 EO 6C N-1 -50 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A10 Eliane de Ceuninck -Yolande Waerseggers 53,22 %
7 EO 2P W = -110 7 31.82
8 EO 2P E+2 -170 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.4 Philippe van der Gracht -Fabienne Smit 42,80 %
9 EO 3S N+2 490 1 4.55
10 EO 4P S = 620 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
A11 Michele Berrier -Teresa Dekoster 45,45 %
11 EO 2K N+3 150 2 9.09
12 EO 3T N = 110 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
A.5 Francoise Turin -Sylviane Delbeke 54,17 %
13 EO 4C S+1 650 0 0.00
14 EO 3P W-1 50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A12 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 45,08 %
15 EO 4P S = 620 10 45.45
16 EO 5P W+1 -680 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 49,24 %
17 EO 4P N = 420 9 40.91
18 EO 3K E+1 -130 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A13 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 32,58 %
19 EO 3S E+1 -630 10 45.45
20 EO 3C S = 140 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.7 Hugo Baetens -Francis Rittweger 58,14 %
21 EO 4P E = -420 13 59.09
22 EO 4C E+1 -650 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Mercedes Oostens 51,89 %
23 EO 3C W-1 100 1 4.55
24 EO 3K W+2 -150 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
A.8 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Marianne Borsu 51,33 %
25 EO 3S E+1 -630 15 68.18
26 EO 4C S = 620 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 200,0 / 528 = 37,88 %
PAIRE a12 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens
A13 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 32,58 %
1 EO 4K E = -130 2 9.09
2 EO 6C S-1 -100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.7 Hugo Baetens -Francis Rittweger 58,14 %
3 EO 4C E = -620 12 54.55
4 EO 4C W-1 100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Mercedes Oostens 51,89 %
5 EO 4P E-1 50 5 22.73
6 EO 3S S+3 490 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.8 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Marianne Borsu 51,33 %
7 EO 3K S-1 -100 1 4.55
8 EO 3P E+1 -170 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 67,23 %
9 EO 3S N+3 490 1 4.55
10 EO 4P S = 620 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
A.9 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 53,98 %
11 EO 3C S+2 200 0 0.00
12 EO 2C E = -110 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
A.3 Claire Derieuw -Catherine de Moffarts 44,89 %
13 EO 4C N = 620 8 36.36
14 EO 3K E-1 50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A10 Eliane de Ceuninck -Yolande Waerseggers 53,22 %
15 EO 4P S = 620 10 45.45
16 EO 6T W = -1370 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.4 Philippe van der Gracht -Fabienne Smit 42,80 %
17 EO 4P N = 420 9 40.91
18 EO 3P W = -140 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.5 Francoise Turin -Sylviane Delbeke 54,17 %
21 EO 4P E-1 50 1 4.55
22 EO 4C E+1 -650 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A12 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 45,08 %
23 EO 3K S-1 -100 4 18.18
24 EO 4C N-2 -100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 49,24 %
25 EO 3S E-1 100 7 31.82
26 EO 3C S+1 170 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 179,0 / 528 = 33,90 %
|