B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 60,91 A.9 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles
--- 2 60,55 A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Fabienne Smit
--- 3 56,52 A.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Yolande Waerseggers
--- 4 54,58 A11 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren
--- 5 52,82 A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier
--- 6 51,25 A12 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin
--- 7 49,03 A.7 Giuseppe Napoli -Martine Zens
--- 8 47,73 A.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne
--- ~ 47,73 A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren
--- 10 45,25 A10 Patricia Bardy -Therese Roland
--- 11 44,37 A14 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne
--- 12 44,36 A13 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart
--- 13 43,31 A.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Claire Derieuw
--- 14 41,67 A.8 Sylviane Delbeke -Catherine de Moffarts
--- 15 0,00 A15 -
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 63,04 a14 Gaetan Collinet -Julia Carakehian
--- 2 61,94 a12 Francoise Turin -Michel Paquot
--- 3 61,18 a.9 Hugo Baetens -Michel Lahaut
--- 4 55,48 a.5 Michel Lievens -Marie J. de Wagheneire
--- 5 55,17 a.8 Gerard Cooreman -Myriam de Timary
--- 6 53,79 a.2 Annie Legrand -Caroll Pucher
--- 7 52,42 a15 Dominique Sassen -Christiane Huby
--- 8 52,33 a11 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat
--- ~ 50,43 a13 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart
--- 10 48,64 a.4 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Teresa Dekoster
--- 11 47,69 a.3 Pascale Bodart -Nadine Brabant
--- 12 42,99 a.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Marie Claire Vienne
--- 13 41,55 a.6 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck
--- 14 35,19 a.7 Pascale Graton -Caroline Lallia
--- 15 28,60 a10 Veronique Englebienne -Evelyn Sorel
PAIRE A.9 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles
a.2 Annie Legrand -Caroll Pucher 53,79 %
1 NS 2S S-3 -150 0.1 0.45
2 NS 6P S = 1430 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Marie Claire Vienne 42,99 %
3 NS 1S W-1 100 21.9 99.55
4 NS 2S S = 120 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 99,55 %
a15 Dominique Sassen -Christiane Huby 52,42 %
5 NS 2P E-1 50 14.3 65.00
6 NS 3TcE = -670 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a14 Gaetan Collinet -Julia Carakehian 63,04 %
7 NS 2P S+2 170 18.6 84.55
8 NS 3S W = -400 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 54,77 %
a13 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 50,43 %
9 NS 5T N = 400 12.1 55.00
10 NS 2C S-2 -200 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a.9 Hugo Baetens -Michel Lahaut 61,18 %
17 NS 1S S+1 120 16.5 75.00
18 NS 4P S+1 650 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a.8 Gerard Cooreman -Myriam de Timary 55,17 %
19 NS 4P N+2 480 18.6 84.55
20 NS 4P W+3 -710 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
a.7 Pascale Graton -Caroline Lallia 35,19 %
21 NS 3P E+1 -170 6.6 30.00
22 NS 3S E = -600 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 27,50 %
a.6 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 41,55 %
23 NS 4C W-1 100 19 86.36
24 NS 3S N+2 460 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
a.5 Michel Lievens -Marie J. de Wagheneire 55,48 %
25 NS 4P W-2 200 22 100.00
26 NS 4C S = 620 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
a.4 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Teresa Dekoster 48,64 %
27 NS 4C E = -420 10 45.45
28 NS 3S N+1 630 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a.3 Pascale Bodart -Nadine Brabant 47,69 %
29 NS 2K E = -90 13.2 60.00
30 NS 3C E-1 50 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
Total : 321,6 / 528 = 60,91 %
PAIRE A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Fabienne Smit
a.4 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Teresa Dekoster 48,64 %
7 NS 4P S-2 -200 2.3 10.45
8 NS 3K W+2 -150 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
a.3 Pascale Bodart -Nadine Brabant 47,69 %
9 NS 5T N = 400 12.1 55.00
10 NS 2S W-2 200 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
a.2 Annie Legrand -Caroll Pucher 53,79 %
11 NS 4P N-2 -100 0.1 0.45
12 NS 3S W = -400 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Marie Claire Vienne 42,99 %
13 NS 3K S-1 -100 14.3 65.00
14 NS 4K S+1 150 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
a15 Dominique Sassen -Christiane Huby 52,42 %
15 NS 1S N+1 120 14.6 66.36
16 NS 5P E+1 -680 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 60,68 %
a14 Gaetan Collinet -Julia Carakehian 63,04 %
17 NS 1S N+1 120 16.5 75.00
18 NS 5PcS = 850 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 87,27 %
a13 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 50,43 %
19 NS 4P N+1 450 12.1 55.00
20 NS 4P W+2 -680 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
a12 Francoise Turin -Michel Paquot 61,94 %
21 NS 3K N = 110 17.5 79.55
22 NS 3S E-1 100 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
a11 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat 52,33 %
23 NS 4C E = -620 8 36.36
24 NS 3S N+2 460 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a10 Veronique Englebienne -Evelyn Sorel 28,60 %
25 NS 3K S = 110 18 81.82
26 NS 4C S = 620 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a.9 Hugo Baetens -Michel Lahaut 61,18 %
27 NS 4C E+1 -450 5 22.73
28 NS 3S N+1 630 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.8 Gerard Cooreman -Myriam de Timary 55,17 %
29 NS 1S S-1 -100 7.7 35.00
30 NS 2C E = -110 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
Total : 319,7 / 528 = 60,55 %
PAIRE A.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Yolande Waerseggers
a.9 Hugo Baetens -Michel Lahaut 61,18 %
1 NS 2K W-1 50 4.5 20.45
2 NS 4P N+2 680 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a.5 Michel Lievens -Marie J. de Wagheneire 55,48 %
9 NS 5K N = 400 12.1 55.00
10 NS 4P W-5 500 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.4 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Teresa Dekoster 48,64 %
11 NS 2P N = 110 17.5 79.55
12 NS 3S W = -400 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a.3 Pascale Bodart -Nadine Brabant 47,69 %
13 NS 3P N-2 -200 4.5 20.45
14 NS 4C E-2 100 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a.2 Annie Legrand -Caroll Pucher 53,79 %
15 NS 50%50% Ajust 11 50.00
16 NS 4P E+2 -680 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Marie Claire Vienne 42,99 %
17 NS 2S S+1 150 21.9 99.55
18 NS 4P N = 620 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a15 Dominique Sassen -Christiane Huby 52,42 %
19 NS 4P N+2 480 18.6 84.55
20 NS 4P E+1 -650 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 92,05 %
a14 Gaetan Collinet -Julia Carakehian 63,04 %
21 NS 2P E+2 -170 6.6 30.00
22 NS 3S E = -600 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 27,50 %
a13 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 50,43 %
23 NS 4C W+1 -650 1 4.55
24 NS 3P W-4 200 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a12 Francoise Turin -Michel Paquot 61,94 %
25 NS 2ScN-2 -300 0 0.00
26 NS 4TcW-3 800 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a11 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat 52,33 %
27 NS 3C E+3 -230 13 59.09
28 NS 4T N+1 150 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a10 Veronique Englebienne -Evelyn Sorel 28,60 %
29 NS 1S S = 90 18.6 84.55
30 NS 3K S = 110 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 87,05 %
Total : 298,4 / 528 = 56,52 %
PAIRE A11 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren
a.6 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 41,55 %
1 NS 2C E-5 250 19.7 89.55
2 NS 4P S+1 650 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.5 Michel Lievens -Marie J. de Wagheneire 55,48 %
3 NS 1S W+1 -120 15.4 70.00
4 NS 2K N-1 -100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.4 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Teresa Dekoster 48,64 %
5 NS 3S S-1 -100 7.7 35.00
6 NS 5TcE-2 500 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a.3 Pascale Bodart -Nadine Brabant 47,69 %
7 NS 3P S = 140 14.3 65.00
8 NS 5K W = -400 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.2 Annie Legrand -Caroll Pucher 53,79 %
9 NS 5T N = 400 12.1 55.00
10 NS 2K N-1 -100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Marie Claire Vienne 42,99 %
11 NS 3P N-1 -50 5.5 25.00
12 NS 3S W = -400 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a15 Dominique Sassen -Christiane Huby 52,42 %
13 NS 3P N-1 -100 14.3 65.00
14 NS 4K S+1 150 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
a11 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat 52,33 %
21 NS 3P E = -140 13.2 60.00
22 NS 3S E = -600 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a10 Veronique Englebienne -Evelyn Sorel 28,60 %
23 NS 3C E+1 -170 16 72.73
24 NS 3S N+2 460 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
a.9 Hugo Baetens -Michel Lahaut 61,18 %
25 NS 4K S-1 -50 10 45.45
26 NS 4C S = 620 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.8 Gerard Cooreman -Myriam de Timary 55,17 %
27 NS 4C E+1 -450 5 22.73
28 NS 4CcE-3 500 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a.7 Pascale Graton -Caroline Lallia 35,19 %
29 NS 1S S = 90 18.6 84.55
30 NS 2C E+2 -170 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
Total : 288,2 / 528 = 54,58 %
PAIRE A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier
a.2 Annie Legrand -Caroll Pucher 53,79 %
3 NS 1S W+1 -120 15.4 70.00
4 NS 2K N-1 -100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Marie Claire Vienne 42,99 %
5 NS 1S S+1 120 19.7 89.55
6 NS 2T E+1 -110 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a15 Dominique Sassen -Christiane Huby 52,42 %
7 NS 4P S-1 -100 8.8 40.00
8 NS 3S W = -400 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 32,50 %
a14 Gaetan Collinet -Julia Carakehian 63,04 %
9 NS 6T N-1 -50 0.1 0.45
10 NS 2S W+3 -210 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 2,95 %
a13 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 50,43 %
11 NS 1P N+1 110 17.5 79.55
12 NS 3S W = -400 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a12 Francoise Turin -Michel Paquot 61,94 %
13 NS 3K N-1 -100 14.3 65.00
14 NS 5K S = 400 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a11 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat 52,33 %
15 NS 1S S+3 180 21.8 99.09
16 NS 4P E+2 -680 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 77,05 %
a10 Veronique Englebienne -Evelyn Sorel 28,60 %
17 NS 1S W-1 50 7.7 35.00
18 NS 4P S+1 650 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.9 Hugo Baetens -Michel Lahaut 61,18 %
19 NS 4P N+1 450 12.1 55.00
20 NS 4P W+3 -710 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.8 Gerard Cooreman -Myriam de Timary 55,17 %
21 NS 4K N = 130 19.7 89.55
22 NS 3S E = -600 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
a.7 Pascale Graton -Caroline Lallia 35,19 %
23 NS 4C W-2 200 22 100.00
24 NS 3S N+2 460 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 93,18 %
a.6 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 41,55 %
25 NS 3P W+1 -170 2 9.09
26 NS 4P N-1 -100 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
Total : 278,9 / 528 = 52,82 %
PAIRE A12 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin
a.8 Gerard Cooreman -Myriam de Timary 55,17 %
1 NS 2T N-1 -50 2.3 10.45
2 NS 6P S = 1430 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.7 Pascale Graton -Caroline Lallia 35,19 %
3 NS 1S W+1 -120 15.4 70.00
4 NS 2K N-1 -100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.6 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 41,55 %
5 NS 2S S+1 150 21.9 99.55
6 NS 1C S+2 140 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 94,55 %
a.5 Michel Lievens -Marie J. de Wagheneire 55,48 %
7 NS 3P S = 140 14.3 65.00
8 NS 3S W = -400 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.4 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Teresa Dekoster 48,64 %
9 NS 5T N = 400 12.1 55.00
10 NS 3S W-4 400 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a.3 Pascale Bodart -Nadine Brabant 47,69 %
11 NS 3P N-1 -50 5.5 25.00
12 NS 3S W = -400 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.2 Annie Legrand -Caroll Pucher 53,79 %
13 NS 3P N-2 -200 4.5 20.45
14 NS 5K S = 400 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Marie Claire Vienne 42,99 %
15 NS 2P E-1 50 5 22.73
16 NS 4P E+2 -680 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 38,86 %
a12 Francoise Turin -Michel Paquot 61,94 %
23 NS 4C E+1 -650 1 4.55
24 NS 3S N-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 2,27 %
a11 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat 52,33 %
25 NS 2P W = -110 8 36.36
26 NS 4C S = 620 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a10 Veronique Englebienne -Evelyn Sorel 28,60 %
27 NS 4P N = 420 22 100.00
28 NS 5T N = 600 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
a.9 Hugo Baetens -Michel Lahaut 61,18 %
29 NS 2C E+1 -140 0.1 0.45
30 NS 2C E = -110 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
Total : 270,6 / 528 = 51,25 %
PAIRE A.7 Giuseppe Napoli -Martine Zens
a13 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 50,43 %
1 NS 1S N+2 150 16.5 75.00
2 NS 6P N-2 -200 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a12 Francoise Turin -Michel Paquot 61,94 %
3 NS 1S W+2 -150 5.5 25.00
4 NS 3K W-1 100 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a11 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat 52,33 %
5 NS 3P E-1 50 14.3 65.00
6 NS 4T E-1 100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
a.7 Pascale Graton -Caroline Lallia 35,19 %
13 NS 3C E-1 100 21.9 99.55
14 NS 5K S = 400 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 94,55 %
a.6 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 41,55 %
15 NS 1S N+2 150 19.4 88.18
16 NS 3P E+3 -230 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 93,86 %
a.5 Michel Lievens -Marie J. de Wagheneire 55,48 %
17 NS 1KcW = -140 0.1 0.45
18 NS 5KcE-2 300 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
a.4 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Teresa Dekoster 48,64 %
19 NS 3S S = 400 5.5 25.00
20 NS 6P W = -1430 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
a.3 Pascale Bodart -Nadine Brabant 47,69 %
21 NS 3C W-1 50 15.4 70.00
22 NS 2S E+2 -180 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a.2 Annie Legrand -Caroll Pucher 53,79 %
23 NS 4C E = -620 8 36.36
24 NS 3T N+2 150 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Marie Claire Vienne 42,99 %
25 NS 3P W-1 100 13 59.09
26 NS 4C S-1 -100 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a15 Dominique Sassen -Christiane Huby 52,42 %
27 NS 4P N-1 -50 17 77.27
28 NS 4T N = 130 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a14 Gaetan Collinet -Julia Carakehian 63,04 %
29 NS 1S S-1 -100 7.7 35.00
30 NS 2C E = -110 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
Total : 258,9 / 528 = 49,03 %
PAIRE A.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne
a.3 Pascale Bodart -Nadine Brabant 47,69 %
5 NS 2P E = -110 2.3 10.45
6 NS 2K S+1 110 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
a.2 Annie Legrand -Caroll Pucher 53,79 %
7 NS 3P S+1 170 18.6 84.55
8 NS 3S W-1 50 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
a.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Marie Claire Vienne 42,99 %
9 NS 5T N = 400 12.1 55.00
10 NS 2P W = -110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a15 Dominique Sassen -Christiane Huby 52,42 %
11 NS 2P N = 110 17.5 79.55
12 NS 3S W+1 -430 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a14 Gaetan Collinet -Julia Carakehian 63,04 %
13 NS 4P N-3 -300 0.1 0.45
14 NS 4C E-1 50 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
a13 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 50,43 %
15 NS 1S N-1 -100 1.4 6.36
16 NS 4P E+2 -680 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 30,68 %
a12 Francoise Turin -Michel Paquot 61,94 %
17 NS 1S W = -90 2.3 10.45
18 NS 5PcS-1 -200 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 5,45 %
a11 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat 52,33 %
19 NS 4P N-1 -50 2.3 10.45
20 NS 6P W+1 -1460 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 5,45 %
a10 Veronique Englebienne -Evelyn Sorel 28,60 %
21 NS 3C W-3 150 21.9 99.55
22 NS 4CcW-3 800 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 99,55 %
a.9 Hugo Baetens -Michel Lahaut 61,18 %
23 NS 3S E-1 100 19 86.36
24 NS 3T N+2 150 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.8 Gerard Cooreman -Myriam de Timary 55,17 %
25 NS 3P W = -140 5 22.73
26 NS 4C S = 620 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.7 Pascale Graton -Caroline Lallia 35,19 %
27 NS 4C E-1 50 20 90.91
28 NS 3S N+1 630 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
Total : 252,0 / 528 = 47,73 %
PAIRE A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren
a11 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat 52,33 %
1 NS 3C E-3 150 16.5 75.00
2 NS 4P S+2 680 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a10 Veronique Englebienne -Evelyn Sorel 28,60 %
3 NS 1S W+1 -120 15.4 70.00
4 NS 3T W-1 100 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
a.6 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 41,55 %
11 NS 3P N-1 -50 5.5 25.00
12 NS 3K E = -110 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a.5 Michel Lievens -Marie J. de Wagheneire 55,48 %
13 NS 3K S-1 -100 14.3 65.00
14 NS 5K S-1 -50 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a.4 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Teresa Dekoster 48,64 %
15 NS 1S S+1 120 14.6 66.36
16 NS 4P E+3 -710 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 38,41 %
a.3 Pascale Bodart -Nadine Brabant 47,69 %
17 NS 2K W-1 50 7.7 35.00
18 NS 5K E-1 50 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.2 Annie Legrand -Caroll Pucher 53,79 %
19 NS 5P N = 450 12.1 55.00
20 NS 5P W+1 -680 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
a.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Marie Claire Vienne 42,99 %
21 NS 3P E+1 -170 6.6 30.00
22 NS 2S E+1 -150 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a15 Dominique Sassen -Christiane Huby 52,42 %
23 NS 4C E = -620 8 36.36
24 NS 2K S+3 150 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a14 Gaetan Collinet -Julia Carakehian 63,04 %
25 NS 4P W-1 100 13 59.09
26 NS 4C S-1 -100 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a13 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 50,43 %
27 NS 3C E+3 -230 13 59.09
28 NS 3S N+1 630 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a12 Francoise Turin -Michel Paquot 61,94 %
29 NS Pass Passe 15.4 70.00
30 NS 5KcN-2 -300 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
Total : 252,0 / 528 = 47,73 %
PAIRE A10 Patricia Bardy -Therese Roland
a.4 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Teresa Dekoster 48,64 %
1 NS 3K W-2 100 9.9 45.00
2 NS 4P S+1 650 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a.3 Pascale Bodart -Nadine Brabant 47,69 %
3 NS 1S W+1 -120 15.4 70.00
4 NS 3T W-1 100 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
a.2 Annie Legrand -Caroll Pucher 53,79 %
5 NS 2P E-1 50 14.3 65.00
6 NS 1S E = -90 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Marie Claire Vienne 42,99 %
7 NS 4P S-1 -100 8.8 40.00
8 NS 2C E-1 50 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a15 Dominique Sassen -Christiane Huby 52,42 %
9 NS 5T N = 400 12.1 55.00
10 NS 2S W+1 -150 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a14 Gaetan Collinet -Julia Carakehian 63,04 %
11 NS 4TcW-1 100 13.2 60.00
12 NS 3S W+1 -430 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a10 Veronique Englebienne -Evelyn Sorel 28,60 %
19 NS 3S S = 400 5.5 25.00
20 NS 4P W+2 -680 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.9 Hugo Baetens -Michel Lahaut 61,18 %
21 NS 3P E+1 -170 6.6 30.00
22 NS 3S E+1 -630 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
a.8 Gerard Cooreman -Myriam de Timary 55,17 %
23 NS 4C E = -620 8 36.36
24 NS 3K S+3 170 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a.7 Pascale Graton -Caroline Lallia 35,19 %
25 NS 3P W = -140 5 22.73
26 NS 4C S+2 680 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a.6 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 41,55 %
27 NS 3P N-1 -50 17 77.27
28 NS 4T N+1 150 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a.5 Michel Lievens -Marie J. de Wagheneire 55,48 %
29 NS 1S S-1 -100 7.7 35.00
30 NS 2CcE = -470 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
Total : 238,9 / 528 = 45,25 %
PAIRE A14 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne
a12 Francoise Turin -Michel Paquot 61,94 %
1 NS 2T N = 90 6.6 30.00
2 NS 4P N+2 680 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
a11 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat 52,33 %
3 NS 1S W+2 -150 5.5 25.00
4 NS 3T W = -110 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
a10 Veronique Englebienne -Evelyn Sorel 28,60 %
5 NS 2P E-1 50 14.3 65.00
6 NS 3K S = 110 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
a.9 Hugo Baetens -Michel Lahaut 61,18 %
7 NS 4P S-2 -200 2.3 10.45
8 NS 3S W = -400 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
a.8 Gerard Cooreman -Myriam de Timary 55,17 %
9 NS 5T N = 400 12.1 55.00
10 NS 2S E+2 -180 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a.7 Pascale Graton -Caroline Lallia 35,19 %
11 NS 2PcN+1 570 21.9 99.55
12 NS 3S W+1 -430 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a.6 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 41,55 %
13 NS 3K S-1 -100 14.3 65.00
14 NS 5K S-1 -50 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a.5 Michel Lievens -Marie J. de Wagheneire 55,48 %
15 NS 1C E-2 100 9.8 44.55
16 NS 5CcE+1 -1050 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 22,50 %
a.4 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Teresa Dekoster 48,64 %
17 NS 1S S+1 120 16.5 75.00
18 NS 4P S+1 650 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a.3 Pascale Bodart -Nadine Brabant 47,69 %
19 NS 3S N+3 490 21.9 99.55
20 NS 6P W = -1430 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a14 Gaetan Collinet -Julia Carakehian 63,04 %
27 NS 4C E+1 -450 5 22.73
28 NS 4C E-3 150 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a13 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 50,43 %
29 NS 1S S+1 120 21.9 99.55
30 NS 3C E = -140 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
Total : 234,3 / 528 = 44,37 %
PAIRE A13 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart
a10 Veronique Englebienne -Evelyn Sorel 28,60 %
1 NS 3S N = 400 21.9 99.55
2 NS 6P S = 1430 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
a.9 Hugo Baetens -Michel Lahaut 61,18 %
3 NS 3S W = -600 0.1 0.45
4 NS 2P E = -110 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 7,95 %
a.8 Gerard Cooreman -Myriam de Timary 55,17 %
5 NS 4T N-1 -100 7.7 35.00
6 NS 3PcN-1 -100 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
a.7 Pascale Graton -Caroline Lallia 35,19 %
7 NS 4P S = 620 21.9 99.55
8 NS 3S W = -400 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a.6 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 41,55 %
9 NS 5T N = 400 12.1 55.00
10 NS 2S W-3 300 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a.5 Michel Lievens -Marie J. de Wagheneire 55,48 %
11 NS 2K S = 90 11 50.00
12 NS 3S W+1 -430 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a.4 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Teresa Dekoster 48,64 %
13 NS 3K S-1 -100 14.3 65.00
14 NS 5K S-1 -50 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a.3 Pascale Bodart -Nadine Brabant 47,69 %
15 NS 1S S+1 120 14.6 66.36
16 NS 4P E+2 -680 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 60,68 %
a.2 Annie Legrand -Caroll Pucher 53,79 %
17 NS 2C N-1 -50 4.5 20.45
18 NS 3P S+2 200 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
a13 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 50,43 %
25 NS 3K S = 110 18 81.82
26 NS 4C S-1 -100 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a12 Francoise Turin -Michel Paquot 61,94 %
27 NS 5C E = -450 5 22.73
28 NS 4T N = 130 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
a11 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat 52,33 %
29 NS 2S W = -120 2.3 10.45
30 NS 4K N = 130 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
Total : 234,2 / 528 = 44,36 %
PAIRE A.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Claire Derieuw
a.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Marie Claire Vienne 42,99 %
1 NS 1S N+1 120 13.2 60.00
2 NS 6P S = 1430 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
a15 Dominique Sassen -Christiane Huby 52,42 %
3 NS 1S W+2 -150 5.5 25.00
4 NS 3K N-2 -200 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 12,73 %
a14 Gaetan Collinet -Julia Carakehian 63,04 %
5 NS 2P E = -110 2.3 10.45
6 NS 3CcS-3 -500 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
a13 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 50,43 %
7 NS 3P S-1 -100 8.8 40.00
8 NS 3K W+1 -130 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
a12 Francoise Turin -Michel Paquot 61,94 %
9 NS 5T N = 400 12.1 55.00
10 NS 2S E+3 -210 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a11 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat 52,33 %
11 NS 3P N-1 -50 5.5 25.00
12 NS 3S W = -400 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a10 Veronique Englebienne -Evelyn Sorel 28,60 %
13 NS 3P N-2 -200 4.5 20.45
14 NS 5C E-2 100 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a.9 Hugo Baetens -Michel Lahaut 61,18 %
15 NS 1S N = 90 7.4 33.64
16 NS 5P E+1 -680 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 44,32 %
a.8 Gerard Cooreman -Myriam de Timary 55,17 %
17 NS 1S S+1 120 16.5 75.00
18 NS 5KcE-2 300 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.7 Pascale Graton -Caroline Lallia 35,19 %
19 NS 4P N+1 450 12.1 55.00
20 NS 5P W+1 -680 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
a.6 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 41,55 %
21 NS 4K N-2 -200 0.1 0.45
22 NS 3S E-2 200 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.5 Michel Lievens -Marie J. de Wagheneire 55,48 %
23 NS 3C W+2 -200 14 63.64
24 NS 3T N+3 170 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
Total : 228,7 / 528 = 43,31 %
PAIRE A.8 Sylviane Delbeke -Catherine de Moffarts
a15 Dominique Sassen -Christiane Huby 52,42 %
1 NS 2C E-2 100 9.9 45.00
2 NS 6P S = 1430 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a14 Gaetan Collinet -Julia Carakehian 63,04 %
3 NS 1S W+2 -150 5.5 25.00
4 NS 2K N+1 110 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
a13 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 50,43 %
5 NS 2P E = -110 2.3 10.45
6 NS 4P S-2 -100 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a12 Francoise Turin -Michel Paquot 61,94 %
7 NS 4P S-2 -200 2.3 10.45
8 NS 3K W+3 -170 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
a.8 Gerard Cooreman -Myriam de Timary 55,17 %
15 NS 2S N-1 -100 1.4 6.36
16 NS 4P E+2 -680 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 30,68 %
a.7 Pascale Graton -Caroline Lallia 35,19 %
17 NS 1S N = 90 11 50.00
18 NS 4P S+1 650 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
a.6 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 41,55 %
19 NS 5S S-3 -150 0.1 0.45
20 NS 4P W+2 -680 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
a.5 Michel Lievens -Marie J. de Wagheneire 55,48 %
21 NS 2P E+2 -170 6.6 30.00
22 NS 2C S-2 -100 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.4 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Teresa Dekoster 48,64 %
23 NS 4C E = -620 8 36.36
24 NS 2S N+2 180 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.3 Pascale Bodart -Nadine Brabant 47,69 %
25 NS 3K S = 110 18 81.82
26 NS 4TcW-2 500 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.2 Annie Legrand -Caroll Pucher 53,79 %
27 NS 4C E+2 -480 0 0.00
28 NS 4T N = 130 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 4,55 %
a.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Marie Claire Vienne 42,99 %
29 NS 1S S-1 -100 7.7 35.00
30 NS 2C E+1 -140 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
Total : 220,0 / 528 = 41,67 %
PAIRE A15 -
a14 Gaetan Collinet -Julia Carakehian 63,04 %
1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a13 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart 50,43 %
3 NS BYE 0 0.00
4 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a12 Francoise Turin -Michel Paquot 61,94 %
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a11 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat 52,33 %
7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a10 Veronique Englebienne -Evelyn Sorel 28,60 %
9 NS BYE 0 0.00
10 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.9 Hugo Baetens -Michel Lahaut 61,18 %
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.8 Gerard Cooreman -Myriam de Timary 55,17 %
13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.7 Pascale Graton -Caroline Lallia 35,19 %
15 NS BYE 0 0.00
16 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.6 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 41,55 %
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.5 Michel Lievens -Marie J. de Wagheneire 55,48 %
19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.4 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Teresa Dekoster 48,64 %
21 NS BYE 0 0.00
22 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a15 Dominique Sassen -Christiane Huby 52,42 %
29 NS BYE 0 0.00
30 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 660 = 0,00 %
PAIRE a14 Gaetan Collinet -Julia Carakehian
A15 - 0,00 %
1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.8 Sylviane Delbeke -Catherine de Moffarts 41,67 %
3 EO 1S W+2 -150 16.5 75.00
4 EO 2K N+1 110 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
A.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Claire Derieuw 43,31 %
5 EO 2P E = -110 19.7 89.55
6 EO 3CcS-3 -500 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
A.9 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 60,91 %
7 EO 2P S+2 170 3.4 15.45
8 EO 3S W = -400 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 45,23 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 52,82 %
9 EO 6T N-1 -50 21.9 99.55
10 EO 2S W+3 -210 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 97,05 %
A10 Patricia Bardy -Therese Roland 45,25 %
11 EO 4TcW-1 100 8.8 40.00
12 EO 3S W+1 -430 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 47,73 %
13 EO 4P N-3 -300 21.9 99.55
14 EO 4C E-1 50 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Fabienne Smit 60,55 %
17 EO 1S N+1 120 5.5 25.00
18 EO 5PcS = 850 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 12,73 %
A.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Yolande Waerseggers 56,52 %
21 EO 2P E+2 -170 15.4 70.00
22 EO 3S E = -600 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 72,50 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 47,73 %
25 EO 4P W-1 100 9 40.91
26 EO 4C S-1 -100 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A14 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 44,37 %
27 EO 4C E+1 -450 17 77.27
28 EO 4C E-3 150 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A.7 Giuseppe Napoli -Martine Zens 49,03 %
29 EO 1S S-1 -100 14.3 65.00
30 EO 2C E = -110 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
Total : 305,1 / 484 = 63,04 %
PAIRE a12 Francoise Turin -Michel Paquot
A14 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 44,37 %
1 EO 2T N = 90 15.4 70.00
2 EO 4P N+2 680 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
A.7 Giuseppe Napoli -Martine Zens 49,03 %
3 EO 1S W+2 -150 16.5 75.00
4 EO 3K W-1 100 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A15 - 0,00 %
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.8 Sylviane Delbeke -Catherine de Moffarts 41,67 %
7 EO 4P S-2 -200 19.7 89.55
8 EO 3K W+3 -170 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Claire Derieuw 43,31 %
9 EO 5T N = 400 9.9 45.00
10 EO 2S E+3 -210 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 52,82 %
13 EO 3K N-1 -100 7.7 35.00
14 EO 5K S = 400 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 47,73 %
17 EO 1S W = -90 19.7 89.55
18 EO 5PcS-1 -200 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 94,55 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Fabienne Smit 60,55 %
21 EO 3K N = 110 4.5 20.45
22 EO 3S E-1 100 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
A12 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin 51,25 %
23 EO 4C E+1 -650 21 95.45
24 EO 3S N-1 -50 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 97,73 %
A.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Yolande Waerseggers 56,52 %
25 EO 2ScN-2 -300 22 100.00
26 EO 4TcW-3 800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 44,36 %
27 EO 5C E = -450 17 77.27
28 EO 4T N = 130 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 47,73 %
29 EO Pass Passe 6.6 30.00
30 EO 5KcN-2 -300 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
Total : 299,8 / 484 = 61,94 %
PAIRE a.9 Hugo Baetens -Michel Lahaut
A.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Yolande Waerseggers 56,52 %
1 EO 2K W-1 50 17.5 79.55
2 EO 4P N+2 680 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 44,36 %
3 EO 3S W = -600 21.9 99.55
4 EO 2P E = -110 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 92,05 %
A14 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 44,37 %
7 EO 4P S-2 -200 19.7 89.55
8 EO 3S W = -400 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
A15 - 0,00 %
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Claire Derieuw 43,31 %
15 EO 1S N = 90 14.6 66.36
16 EO 5P E+1 -680 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 55,68 %
A.9 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 60,91 %
17 EO 1S S+1 120 5.5 25.00
18 EO 4P S+1 650 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 52,82 %
19 EO 4P N+1 450 9.9 45.00
20 EO 4P W+3 -710 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A10 Patricia Bardy -Therese Roland 45,25 %
21 EO 3P E+1 -170 15.4 70.00
22 EO 3S E+1 -630 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
A.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 47,73 %
23 EO 3S E-1 100 3 13.64
24 EO 3T N+2 150 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A11 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren 54,58 %
25 EO 4K S-1 -50 12 54.55
26 EO 4C S = 620 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Fabienne Smit 60,55 %
27 EO 4C E+1 -450 17 77.27
28 EO 3S N+1 630 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A12 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin 51,25 %
29 EO 2C E+1 -140 21.9 99.55
30 EO 2C E = -110 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
Total : 296,1 / 484 = 61,18 %
PAIRE a.5 Michel Lievens -Marie J. de Wagheneire
A11 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren 54,58 %
3 EO 1S W+1 -120 6.6 30.00
4 EO 2K N-1 -100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A12 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin 51,25 %
7 EO 3P S = 140 7.7 35.00
8 EO 3S W = -400 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Yolande Waerseggers 56,52 %
9 EO 5K N = 400 9.9 45.00
10 EO 4P W-5 500 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 44,36 %
11 EO 2K S = 90 11 50.00
12 EO 3S W+1 -430 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 47,73 %
13 EO 3K S-1 -100 7.7 35.00
14 EO 5K S-1 -50 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A14 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 44,37 %
15 EO 1C E-2 100 12.2 55.45
16 EO 5CcE+1 -1050 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 77,50 %
A.7 Giuseppe Napoli -Martine Zens 49,03 %
17 EO 1KcW = -140 21.9 99.55
18 EO 5KcE-2 300 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
A15 - 0,00 %
19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.8 Sylviane Delbeke -Catherine de Moffarts 41,67 %
21 EO 2P E+2 -170 15.4 70.00
22 EO 2C S-2 -100 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Claire Derieuw 43,31 %
23 EO 3C W+2 -200 8 36.36
24 EO 3T N+3 170 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.9 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 60,91 %
25 EO 4P W-2 200 0 0.00
26 EO 4C S = 620 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
A10 Patricia Bardy -Therese Roland 45,25 %
29 EO 1S S-1 -100 14.3 65.00
30 EO 2CcE = -470 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
Total : 268,5 / 484 = 55,48 %
PAIRE a.8 Gerard Cooreman -Myriam de Timary
A12 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin 51,25 %
1 EO 2T N-1 -50 19.7 89.55
2 EO 6P S = 1430 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 44,36 %
5 EO 4T N-1 -100 14.3 65.00
6 EO 3PcN-1 -100 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
A14 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 44,37 %
9 EO 5T N = 400 9.9 45.00
10 EO 2S E+2 -180 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A15 - 0,00 %
13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.8 Sylviane Delbeke -Catherine de Moffarts 41,67 %
15 EO 2S N-1 -100 20.6 93.64
16 EO 4P E+2 -680 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 69,32 %
A.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Claire Derieuw 43,31 %
17 EO 1S S+1 120 5.5 25.00
18 EO 5KcE-2 300 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.9 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 60,91 %
19 EO 4P N+2 480 3.4 15.45
20 EO 4P W+3 -710 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 52,82 %
21 EO 4K N = 130 2.3 10.45
22 EO 3S E = -600 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
A10 Patricia Bardy -Therese Roland 45,25 %
23 EO 4C E = -620 14 63.64
24 EO 3K S+3 170 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 47,73 %
25 EO 3P W = -140 17 77.27
26 EO 4C S = 620 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A11 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren 54,58 %
27 EO 4C E+1 -450 17 77.27
28 EO 4CcE-3 500 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Fabienne Smit 60,55 %
29 EO 1S S-1 -100 14.3 65.00
30 EO 2C E = -110 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
Total : 267,0 / 484 = 55,17 %
PAIRE a.2 Annie Legrand -Caroll Pucher
A.9 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 60,91 %
1 EO 2S S-3 -150 21.9 99.55
2 EO 6P S = 1430 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 52,82 %
3 EO 1S W+1 -120 6.6 30.00
4 EO 2K N-1 -100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A10 Patricia Bardy -Therese Roland 45,25 %
5 EO 2P E-1 50 7.7 35.00
6 EO 1S E = -90 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 47,73 %
7 EO 3P S+1 170 3.4 15.45
8 EO 3S W-1 50 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
A11 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren 54,58 %
9 EO 5T N = 400 9.9 45.00
10 EO 2K N-1 -100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Fabienne Smit 60,55 %
11 EO 4P N-2 -100 21.9 99.55
12 EO 3S W = -400 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A12 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin 51,25 %
13 EO 3P N-2 -200 17.5 79.55
14 EO 5K S = 400 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Yolande Waerseggers 56,52 %
15 EO 50%50% Ajust 11 50.00
16 EO 4P E+2 -680 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 44,36 %
17 EO 2C N-1 -50 17.5 79.55
18 EO 3P S+2 200 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 47,73 %
19 EO 5P N = 450 9.9 45.00
20 EO 5P W+1 -680 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
A.7 Giuseppe Napoli -Martine Zens 49,03 %
23 EO 4C E = -620 14 63.64
24 EO 3T N+2 150 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.8 Sylviane Delbeke -Catherine de Moffarts 41,67 %
27 EO 4C E+2 -480 22 100.00
28 EO 4T N = 130 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 95,45 %
Total : 284,0 / 528 = 53,79 %
PAIRE a15 Dominique Sassen -Christiane Huby
A.8 Sylviane Delbeke -Catherine de Moffarts 41,67 %
1 EO 2C E-2 100 12.1 55.00
2 EO 6P S = 1430 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Claire Derieuw 43,31 %
3 EO 1S W+2 -150 16.5 75.00
4 EO 3K N-2 -200 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 87,27 %
A.9 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 60,91 %
5 EO 2P E-1 50 7.7 35.00
6 EO 3TcE = -670 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 52,82 %
7 EO 4P S-1 -100 13.2 60.00
8 EO 3S W = -400 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 67,50 %
A10 Patricia Bardy -Therese Roland 45,25 %
9 EO 5T N = 400 9.9 45.00
10 EO 2S W+1 -150 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 47,73 %
11 EO 2P N = 110 4.5 20.45
12 EO 3S W+1 -430 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A11 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren 54,58 %
13 EO 3P N-1 -100 7.7 35.00
14 EO 4K S+1 150 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Fabienne Smit 60,55 %
15 EO 1S N+1 120 7.4 33.64
16 EO 5P E+1 -680 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 39,32 %
A.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Yolande Waerseggers 56,52 %
19 EO 4P N+2 480 3.4 15.45
20 EO 4P E+1 -650 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 7,95 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 47,73 %
23 EO 4C E = -620 14 63.64
24 EO 2K S+3 150 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.7 Giuseppe Napoli -Martine Zens 49,03 %
27 EO 4P N-1 -50 5 22.73
28 EO 4T N = 130 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A15 - 0,00 %
29 EO BYE 0 0.00
30 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 253,7 / 484 = 52,42 %
PAIRE a11 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 47,73 %
1 EO 3C E-3 150 5.5 25.00
2 EO 4P S+2 680 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A14 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 44,37 %
3 EO 1S W+2 -150 16.5 75.00
4 EO 3T W = -110 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
A.7 Giuseppe Napoli -Martine Zens 49,03 %
5 EO 3P E-1 50 7.7 35.00
6 EO 4T E-1 100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
A15 - 0,00 %
7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Claire Derieuw 43,31 %
11 EO 3P N-1 -50 16.5 75.00
12 EO 3S W = -400 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 52,82 %
15 EO 1S S+3 180 0.2 0.91
16 EO 4P E+2 -680 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 22,95 %
A.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 47,73 %
19 EO 4P N-1 -50 19.7 89.55
20 EO 6P W+1 -1460 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 94,55 %
A11 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren 54,58 %
21 EO 3P E = -140 8.8 40.00
22 EO 3S E = -600 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Fabienne Smit 60,55 %
23 EO 4C E = -620 14 63.64
24 EO 3S N+2 460 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A12 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin 51,25 %
25 EO 2P W = -110 14 63.64
26 EO 4C S = 620 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Yolande Waerseggers 56,52 %
27 EO 3C E+3 -230 9 40.91
28 EO 4T N+1 150 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 44,36 %
29 EO 2S W = -120 19.7 89.55
30 EO 4K N = 130 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
Total : 253,3 / 484 = 52,33 %
PAIRE a13 Helene Christiaens -Didier Collart
A.7 Giuseppe Napoli -Martine Zens 49,03 %
1 EO 1S N+2 150 5.5 25.00
2 EO 6P N-2 -200 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A15 - 0,00 %
3 EO BYE 0 0.00
4 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.8 Sylviane Delbeke -Catherine de Moffarts 41,67 %
5 EO 2P E = -110 19.7 89.55
6 EO 4P S-2 -100 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Claire Derieuw 43,31 %
7 EO 3P S-1 -100 13.2 60.00
8 EO 3K W+1 -130 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
A.9 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 60,91 %
9 EO 5T N = 400 9.9 45.00
10 EO 2C S-2 -200 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 52,82 %
11 EO 1P N+1 110 4.5 20.45
12 EO 3S W = -400 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 47,73 %
15 EO 1S N-1 -100 20.6 93.64
16 EO 4P E+2 -680 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 69,32 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Fabienne Smit 60,55 %
19 EO 4P N+1 450 9.9 45.00
20 EO 4P W+2 -680 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
A.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Yolande Waerseggers 56,52 %
23 EO 4C W+1 -650 21 95.45
24 EO 3P W-4 200 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 44,36 %
25 EO 3K S = 110 4 18.18
26 EO 4C S-1 -100 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 47,73 %
27 EO 3C E+3 -230 9 40.91
28 EO 3S N+1 630 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A14 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 44,37 %
29 EO 1S S+1 120 0.1 0.45
30 EO 3C E = -140 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
Total : 244,1 / 484 = 50,43 %
PAIRE a.4 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Teresa Dekoster
A10 Patricia Bardy -Therese Roland 45,25 %
1 EO 3K W-2 100 12.1 55.00
2 EO 4P S+1 650 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A11 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren 54,58 %
5 EO 3S S-1 -100 14.3 65.00
6 EO 5TcE-2 500 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Fabienne Smit 60,55 %
7 EO 4P S-2 -200 19.7 89.55
8 EO 3K W+2 -150 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
A12 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin 51,25 %
9 EO 5T N = 400 9.9 45.00
10 EO 3S W-4 400 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Yolande Waerseggers 56,52 %
11 EO 2P N = 110 4.5 20.45
12 EO 3S W = -400 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 44,36 %
13 EO 3K S-1 -100 7.7 35.00
14 EO 5K S-1 -50 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 47,73 %
15 EO 1S S+1 120 7.4 33.64
16 EO 4P E+3 -710 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 61,59 %
A14 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 44,37 %
17 EO 1S S+1 120 5.5 25.00
18 EO 4P S+1 650 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A.7 Giuseppe Napoli -Martine Zens 49,03 %
19 EO 3S S = 400 16.5 75.00
20 EO 6P W = -1430 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
A15 - 0,00 %
21 EO BYE 0 0.00
22 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.8 Sylviane Delbeke -Catherine de Moffarts 41,67 %
23 EO 4C E = -620 14 63.64
24 EO 2S N+2 180 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.9 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 60,91 %
27 EO 4C E = -420 12 54.55
28 EO 3S N+1 630 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
Total : 235,4 / 484 = 48,64 %
PAIRE a.3 Pascale Bodart -Nadine Brabant
A10 Patricia Bardy -Therese Roland 45,25 %
3 EO 1S W+1 -120 6.6 30.00
4 EO 3T W-1 100 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
A.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 47,73 %
5 EO 2P E = -110 19.7 89.55
6 EO 2K S+1 110 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
A11 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren 54,58 %
7 EO 3P S = 140 7.7 35.00
8 EO 5K W = -400 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Fabienne Smit 60,55 %
9 EO 5T N = 400 9.9 45.00
10 EO 2S W-2 200 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
A12 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin 51,25 %
11 EO 3P N-1 -50 16.5 75.00
12 EO 3S W = -400 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Yolande Waerseggers 56,52 %
13 EO 3P N-2 -200 17.5 79.55
14 EO 4C E-2 100 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 44,36 %
15 EO 1S S+1 120 7.4 33.64
16 EO 4P E+2 -680 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 39,32 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 47,73 %
17 EO 2K W-1 50 14.3 65.00
18 EO 5K E-1 50 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A14 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 44,37 %
19 EO 3S N+3 490 0.1 0.45
20 EO 6P W = -1430 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A.7 Giuseppe Napoli -Martine Zens 49,03 %
21 EO 3C W-1 50 6.6 30.00
22 EO 2S E+2 -180 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A.8 Sylviane Delbeke -Catherine de Moffarts 41,67 %
25 EO 3K S = 110 4 18.18
26 EO 4TcW-2 500 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.9 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 60,91 %
29 EO 2K E = -90 8.8 40.00
30 EO 3C E-1 50 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
Total : 251,8 / 528 = 47,69 %
PAIRE a.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Marie Claire Vienne
A.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Claire Derieuw 43,31 %
1 EO 1S N+1 120 8.8 40.00
2 EO 6P S = 1430 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
A.9 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 60,91 %
3 EO 1S W-1 100 0.1 0.45
4 EO 2S S = 120 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 0,45 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 52,82 %
5 EO 1S S+1 120 2.3 10.45
6 EO 2T E+1 -110 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A10 Patricia Bardy -Therese Roland 45,25 %
7 EO 4P S-1 -100 13.2 60.00
8 EO 2C E-1 50 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 47,73 %
9 EO 5T N = 400 9.9 45.00
10 EO 2P W = -110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A11 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren 54,58 %
11 EO 3P N-1 -50 16.5 75.00
12 EO 3S W = -400 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Fabienne Smit 60,55 %
13 EO 3K S-1 -100 7.7 35.00
14 EO 4K S+1 150 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
A12 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin 51,25 %
15 EO 2P E-1 50 17 77.27
16 EO 4P E+2 -680 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 61,14 %
A.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Yolande Waerseggers 56,52 %
17 EO 2S S+1 150 0.1 0.45
18 EO 4P N = 620 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 47,73 %
21 EO 3P E+1 -170 15.4 70.00
22 EO 2S E+1 -150 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.7 Giuseppe Napoli -Martine Zens 49,03 %
25 EO 3P W-1 100 9 40.91
26 EO 4C S-1 -100 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.8 Sylviane Delbeke -Catherine de Moffarts 41,67 %
29 EO 1S S-1 -100 14.3 65.00
30 EO 2C E+1 -140 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
Total : 227,0 / 528 = 42,99 %
PAIRE a.6 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck
A11 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren 54,58 %
1 EO 2C E-5 250 2.3 10.45
2 EO 4P S+1 650 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A12 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin 51,25 %
5 EO 2S S+1 150 0.1 0.45
6 EO 1C S+2 140 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 5,45 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 44,36 %
9 EO 5T N = 400 9.9 45.00
10 EO 2S W-3 300 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 47,73 %
11 EO 3P N-1 -50 16.5 75.00
12 EO 3K E = -110 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A14 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 44,37 %
13 EO 3K S-1 -100 7.7 35.00
14 EO 5K S-1 -50 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A.7 Giuseppe Napoli -Martine Zens 49,03 %
15 EO 1S N+2 150 2.6 11.82
16 EO 3P E+3 -230 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 6,14 %
A15 - 0,00 %
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.8 Sylviane Delbeke -Catherine de Moffarts 41,67 %
19 EO 5S S-3 -150 21.9 99.55
20 EO 4P W+2 -680 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Claire Derieuw 43,31 %
21 EO 4K N-2 -200 21.9 99.55
22 EO 3S E-2 200 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.9 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 60,91 %
23 EO 4C W-1 100 3 13.64
24 EO 3S N+2 460 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 52,82 %
25 EO 3P W+1 -170 20 90.91
26 EO 4P N-1 -100 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
A10 Patricia Bardy -Therese Roland 45,25 %
27 EO 3P N-1 -50 5 22.73
28 EO 4T N+1 150 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
Total : 201,1 / 484 = 41,55 %
PAIRE a.7 Pascale Graton -Caroline Lallia
A12 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin 51,25 %
3 EO 1S W+1 -120 6.6 30.00
4 EO 2K N-1 -100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 44,36 %
7 EO 4P S = 620 0.1 0.45
8 EO 3S W = -400 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A14 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 44,37 %
11 EO 2PcN+1 570 0.1 0.45
12 EO 3S W+1 -430 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A.7 Giuseppe Napoli -Martine Zens 49,03 %
13 EO 3C E-1 100 0.1 0.45
14 EO 5K S = 400 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 5,45 %
A15 - 0,00 %
15 EO BYE 0 0.00
16 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.8 Sylviane Delbeke -Catherine de Moffarts 41,67 %
17 EO 1S N = 90 11 50.00
18 EO 4P S+1 650 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
A.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Claire Derieuw 43,31 %
19 EO 4P N+1 450 9.9 45.00
20 EO 5P W+1 -680 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
A.9 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 60,91 %
21 EO 3P E+1 -170 15.4 70.00
22 EO 3S E = -600 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 72,50 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 52,82 %
23 EO 4C W-2 200 0 0.00
24 EO 3S N+2 460 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 6,82 %
A10 Patricia Bardy -Therese Roland 45,25 %
25 EO 3P W = -140 17 77.27
26 EO 4C S+2 680 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 47,73 %
27 EO 4C E-1 50 2 9.09
28 EO 3S N+1 630 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
A11 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren 54,58 %
29 EO 1S S = 90 3.4 15.45
30 EO 2C E+2 -170 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
Total : 170,3 / 484 = 35,19 %
PAIRE a10 Veronique Englebienne -Evelyn Sorel
A13 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 44,36 %
1 EO 3S N = 400 0.1 0.45
2 EO 6P S = 1430 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 47,73 %
3 EO 1S W+1 -120 6.6 30.00
4 EO 3T W-1 100 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
A14 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 44,37 %
5 EO 2P E-1 50 7.7 35.00
6 EO 3K S = 110 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
A15 - 0,00 %
9 EO BYE 0 0.00
10 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Claire Derieuw 43,31 %
13 EO 3P N-2 -200 17.5 79.55
14 EO 5C E-2 100 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 52,82 %
17 EO 1S W-1 50 14.3 65.00
18 EO 4P S+1 650 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A10 Patricia Bardy -Therese Roland 45,25 %
19 EO 3S S = 400 16.5 75.00
20 EO 4P W+2 -680 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 47,73 %
21 EO 3C W-3 150 0.1 0.45
22 EO 4CcW-3 800 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 0,45 %
A11 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren 54,58 %
23 EO 3C E+1 -170 6 27.27
24 EO 3S N+2 460 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Fabienne Smit 60,55 %
25 EO 3K S = 110 4 18.18
26 EO 4C S = 620 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A12 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin 51,25 %
27 EO 4P N = 420 0 0.00
28 EO 5T N = 600 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
A.5 Eliane de Ceuninck -Yolande Waerseggers 56,52 %
29 EO 1S S = 90 3.4 15.45
30 EO 3K S = 110 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 12,95 %
Total : 138,4 / 484 = 28,60 %
|