B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 61,74 N.1 Sophie Tilemans -Grazia Neuenschwander
--- 2 59,66 N.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois
--- 3 57,58 N15 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen
--- 4 53,03 N.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh
--- 5 52,65 N14 Francoise Duren -Giuseppe Napoli
--- 6 49,43 N.3 Sophie Noach -Colette Heerinckx
--- 7 49,24 N.5 Patricia Bardy -Jeanine Bontemps
--- 8 48,48 N10 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe
--- 9 48,30 N.6 Sandra Dallemagne -Marianne Borsu
--- 10 47,92 N12 Sylviane Delbeke -Thierry Goemaere
--- 11 46,97 N.4 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles
--- 12 46,02 N.8 Chris Oostens -Michele Verhulst
--- 13 43,75 N11 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski
--- 14 43,18 N13 Max Poupinel -Josiane Bonieux
--- 15 42,05 N.9 Claire Derieuw -Chantal de Lichtervelde
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 57,39 e10 Lydia Wildiers -Michel Paquot
--- 2 55,87 e.3 Fabienne Smit -Philippe de Lisius
--- 3 55,87 e12 Marie Claire Vienne -Francine Dozin
--- 4 54,92 e.5 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed
--- 5 54,55 e.7 Dominique Sassen -Lydia Luyten
--- 6 53,60 e.2 Liliane Baptista -Jeanine Thys
--- 7 52,46 e15 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
--- 8 50,57 e14 Noelle Fosse -Marie Christine Remy
--- 9 49,81 e.1 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory
--- 10 48,67 e.4 Serge Alard -Stan Tabor
--- 11 47,16 e.6 Andre Delacroix -Peter Masterson
--- 12 44,70 e.8 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
--- 13 43,37 e13 Didier Collart -Veronique Englebienne
--- 14 42,23 e11 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve
--- 15 38,83 e.9 Helene Schyns -Antoinette Jourdain
PAIRE N.1 Sophie Tilemans -Grazia Neuenschwander
e.1 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 49,81 %
1 NS 3C E-1 50 19 86.36
2 NS 1S N+1 120 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
e15 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 52,46 %
3 NS 6C W = -1430 13 59.09
4 NS 2S N+2 180 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
e14 Noelle Fosse -Marie Christine Remy 50,57 %
5 NS 4C S = 620 13 59.09
6 NS 2S S+2 180 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
e13 Didier Collart -Veronique Englebienne 43,37 %
7 NS 3C S+1 170 20 90.91
8 NS 2C S+1 140 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
e12 Marie Claire Vienne -Francine Dozin 55,87 %
9 NS 4C W+2 -680 11 50.00
10 NS 4C N+1 650 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
e11 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 42,23 %
11 NS 1S W-1 50 21 95.45
12 NS 2S N = 120 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 97,73 %
e10 Lydia Wildiers -Michel Paquot 57,39 %
13 NS 3S E+1 -630 4 18.18
14 NS 4P S-1 -50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
e.9 Helene Schyns -Antoinette Jourdain 38,83 %
15 NS 3S E-2 100 21 95.45
16 NS 5TcS = 550 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 93,18 %
e.8 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 44,70 %
17 NS 6S S = 990 22 100.00
18 NS 4C N = 620 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 93,18 %
e.7 Dominique Sassen -Lydia Luyten 54,55 %
19 NS 4K S-5 -250 4 18.18
20 NS 4C E = -620 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
e.6 Andre Delacroix -Peter Masterson 47,16 %
21 NS 2C S+3 200 9 40.91
22 NS 4P N = 420 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
e.5 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 54,92 %
23 NS 1P S+1 110 17 77.27
24 NS 3K N+2 150 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
Total : 326,0 / 528 = 61,74 %
PAIRE N.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois
e.2 Liliane Baptista -Jeanine Thys 53,60 %
3 NS 6C W = -1430 13 59.09
4 NS 3S N+2 660 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
e.1 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 49,81 %
5 NS 4C N+1 650 17 77.27
6 NS 3S S+3 490 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
e15 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 52,46 %
7 NS 2C S+1 140 14 63.64
8 NS 2C S+2 170 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
e14 Noelle Fosse -Marie Christine Remy 50,57 %
9 NS 3S W = -600 20 90.91
10 NS 5C N-2 -200 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
e13 Didier Collart -Veronique Englebienne 43,37 %
11 NS 3C E+1 -170 10 45.45
12 NS 1P N = 80 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
e12 Marie Claire Vienne -Francine Dozin 55,87 %
13 NS 3S E = -600 14 63.64
14 NS 4P S-1 -50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
e11 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 42,23 %
15 NS 2S E-1 50 17 77.27
16 NS 7TcS-2 -300 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
e10 Lydia Wildiers -Michel Paquot 57,39 %
17 NS 6C S-1 -50 2 9.09
18 NS 4C N-1 -100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
e.9 Helene Schyns -Antoinette Jourdain 38,83 %
19 NS 3P E+1 -170 11 50.00
20 NS 4C E = -620 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
e.8 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 44,70 %
21 NS 4P S+1 650 21 95.45
22 NS 4P N = 420 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
e.7 Dominique Sassen -Lydia Luyten 54,55 %
23 NS 3P S-1 -100 7 31.82
24 NS 3S S+2 460 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
e.6 Andre Delacroix -Peter Masterson 47,16 %
25 NS 2C S+1 140 19 86.36
26 NS 4P N = 620 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
Total : 315,0 / 528 = 59,66 %
PAIRE N15 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen
e14 Noelle Fosse -Marie Christine Remy 50,57 %
1 NS 3C W = -140 7 31.82
2 NS 2S N = 120 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
e13 Didier Collart -Veronique Englebienne 43,37 %
3 NS 6S W = -1440 5 22.73
4 NS 3S N+3 690 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
e12 Marie Claire Vienne -Francine Dozin 55,87 %
5 NS 4P E-2 100 0 0.00
6 NS 3S S+1 430 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
e11 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 42,23 %
7 NS 4C N+1 650 22 100.00
8 NS 2C S = 110 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
e10 Lydia Wildiers -Michel Paquot 57,39 %
9 NS 5C E+1 -680 11 50.00
10 NS 4C N+1 650 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
e.9 Helene Schyns -Antoinette Jourdain 38,83 %
11 NS 2C E+1 -140 18 81.82
12 NS 1S W = -90 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
e.8 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 44,70 %
13 NS 6S E-2 200 22 100.00
14 NS 6S N-1 -50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
e.7 Dominique Sassen -Lydia Luyten 54,55 %
15 NS 2K W+1 -110 8 36.36
16 NS 4T S+1 150 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
e.6 Andre Delacroix -Peter Masterson 47,16 %
17 NS 4S S+1 460 16 72.73
18 NS 4C N-1 -100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
e.5 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 54,92 %
19 NS 3P E+1 -170 11 50.00
20 NS 4C E = -620 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
e.4 Serge Alard -Stan Tabor 48,67 %
21 NS 4P S = 620 15 68.18
22 NS 4P N+1 450 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
e15 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 52,46 %
29 NS 3P S-2 -200 2 9.09
30 NS 3ScW-1 100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
Total : 304,0 / 528 = 57,58 %
PAIRE N.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh
e13 Didier Collart -Veronique Englebienne 43,37 %
1 NS 3T S-1 -50 16 72.73
2 NS 2K S-1 -100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
e12 Marie Claire Vienne -Francine Dozin 55,87 %
3 NS 3S W+4 -720 21 95.45
4 NS 3S N+3 690 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
e11 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 42,23 %
5 NS 3C N+2 200 7 31.82
6 NS 3S S+2 460 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
e.7 Dominique Sassen -Lydia Luyten 54,55 %
13 NS 3S E+1 -630 4 18.18
14 NS 4P S-1 -50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
e.6 Andre Delacroix -Peter Masterson 47,16 %
15 NS 3K W+1 -130 0 0.00
16 NS 5TcS = 550 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
e.5 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 54,92 %
17 NS 4C S+1 450 11 50.00
18 NS 4C N-1 -100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
e.4 Serge Alard -Stan Tabor 48,67 %
19 NS 3P E = -140 18 81.82
20 NS 6C E = -1430 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
e.3 Fabienne Smit -Philippe de Lisius 55,87 %
21 NS 4P S-1 -100 0 0.00
22 NS 4P N+1 450 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
e.2 Liliane Baptista -Jeanine Thys 53,60 %
23 NS 2C W-1 100 12 54.55
24 NS 3S S+2 460 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
e.1 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 49,81 %
25 NS 2T N-1 -50 6 27.27
26 NS 2P S+1 140 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
e15 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 52,46 %
27 NS 3S W = -400 6 27.27
28 NS 4P S+2 680 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
e14 Noelle Fosse -Marie Christine Remy 50,57 %
29 NS 3P S-1 -100 18 81.82
30 NS 3S W-3 150 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
Total : 280,0 / 528 = 53,03 %
PAIRE N14 Francoise Duren -Giuseppe Napoli
e12 Marie Claire Vienne -Francine Dozin 55,87 %
1 NS 2C W = -110 12 54.55
2 NS 1S N-1 -100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
e11 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 42,23 %
3 NS 6C W = -1430 13 59.09
4 NS 3S N+2 660 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
e10 Lydia Wildiers -Michel Paquot 57,39 %
5 NS 4C S+1 650 17 77.27
6 NS 3S S+2 460 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
e.9 Helene Schyns -Antoinette Jourdain 38,83 %
7 NS 4C N-1 -100 2 9.09
8 NS 2C S+2 170 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
e.8 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 44,70 %
9 NS 3S E+3 -690 6 27.27
10 NS 4C N+1 650 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
e.7 Dominique Sassen -Lydia Luyten 54,55 %
11 NS 3C E+1 -170 10 45.45
12 NS 2S W = -120 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
e.6 Andre Delacroix -Peter Masterson 47,16 %
13 NS 3S E+1 -630 4 18.18
14 NS 4P S-1 -50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
e.5 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 54,92 %
15 NS 3K W = -110 8 36.36
16 NS 6TcS-1 -100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
e.4 Serge Alard -Stan Tabor 48,67 %
17 NS 4C S+2 480 19 86.36
18 NS 4C N = 620 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
e.3 Fabienne Smit -Philippe de Lisius 55,87 %
19 NS 4C N-3 -150 15 68.18
20 NS 6C E-1 100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
e14 Noelle Fosse -Marie Christine Remy 50,57 %
27 NS 3S W = -400 6 27.27
28 NS 4P S+2 680 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
e13 Didier Collart -Veronique Englebienne 43,37 %
29 NS 4K E-1 100 20 90.91
30 NS 3S W-1 50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
Total : 278,0 / 528 = 52,65 %
PAIRE N.3 Sophie Noach -Colette Heerinckx
e.3 Fabienne Smit -Philippe de Lisius 55,87 %
5 NS 2C N+2 170 4 18.18
6 NS 3S S+2 460 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
e.2 Liliane Baptista -Jeanine Thys 53,60 %
7 NS 2C S+1 140 14 63.64
8 NS 2C S-1 -50 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
e.1 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 49,81 %
9 NS 4C W+2 -680 11 50.00
10 NS 4C N-1 -100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
e15 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 52,46 %
11 NS 4P W-1 50 21 95.45
12 NS 2S E-2 100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 93,18 %
e14 Noelle Fosse -Marie Christine Remy 50,57 %
13 NS 3S E = -600 14 63.64
14 NS 4P S-1 -50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
e13 Didier Collart -Veronique Englebienne 43,37 %
15 NS 2K W+1 -110 8 36.36
16 NS 4T S+1 150 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
e12 Marie Claire Vienne -Francine Dozin 55,87 %
17 NS 4C S+1 450 11 50.00
18 NS 4C N-2 -200 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
e11 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 42,23 %
19 NS 5P E-2 200 22 100.00
20 NS 4C E+2 -680 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
e10 Lydia Wildiers -Michel Paquot 57,39 %
21 NS 4P S = 620 15 68.18
22 NS 2P N+2 170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
e.9 Helene Schyns -Antoinette Jourdain 38,83 %
23 NS 1P S = 80 10 45.45
24 NS 3K N+2 150 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
e.8 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 44,70 %
25 NS 2C S-1 -50 6 27.27
26 NS 3P S+1 170 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
e.7 Dominique Sassen -Lydia Luyten 54,55 %
27 NS 3S W-1 50 18 81.82
28 NS 5P S+1 680 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
Total : 261,0 / 528 = 49,43 %
PAIRE N.5 Patricia Bardy -Jeanine Bontemps
e.9 Helene Schyns -Antoinette Jourdain 38,83 %
1 NS 4C E-4 200 22 100.00
2 NS 1S N-1 -100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
e.5 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 54,92 %
9 NS 6C W-1 100 22 100.00
10 NS 4PcE-2 500 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
e.4 Serge Alard -Stan Tabor 48,67 %
11 NS 2P W+2 -170 10 45.45
12 NS 1P N-1 -100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
e.3 Fabienne Smit -Philippe de Lisius 55,87 %
13 NS 3S E = -600 14 63.64
14 NS 5P S-1 -50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
e.2 Liliane Baptista -Jeanine Thys 53,60 %
15 NS 3K W = -110 8 36.36
16 NS 5P E = -650 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
e.1 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 49,81 %
17 NS 4C S+1 450 11 50.00
18 NS 4C N-1 -100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
e15 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 52,46 %
19 NS 4K S-3 -150 15 68.18
20 NS 4C E = -620 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
e14 Noelle Fosse -Marie Christine Remy 50,57 %
21 NS 4P S = 620 15 68.18
22 NS 4P N = 420 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
e13 Didier Collart -Veronique Englebienne 43,37 %
23 NS 2P S = 110 17 77.27
24 NS 3K N+2 150 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
e12 Marie Claire Vienne -Francine Dozin 55,87 %
25 NS 3C S-1 -50 6 27.27
26 NS 4P S = 620 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
e11 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 42,23 %
27 NS 3S W = -400 6 27.27
28 NS 4P S+2 680 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
e10 Lydia Wildiers -Michel Paquot 57,39 %
29 NS 4K E = -130 10 45.45
30 NS 3S W = -400 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
Total : 260,0 / 528 = 49,24 %
PAIRE N10 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe
e.4 Serge Alard -Stan Tabor 48,67 %
1 NS 2C W+2 -170 2 9.09
2 NS 1S N-2 -200 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
e.3 Fabienne Smit -Philippe de Lisius 55,87 %
3 NS 6C E = -1430 13 59.09
4 NS 3S N+2 660 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
e.2 Liliane Baptista -Jeanine Thys 53,60 %
5 NS 5CcS = 850 20 90.91
6 NS 3S S+1 430 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
e.1 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 49,81 %
7 NS 1K W-1 100 8 36.36
8 NS 2C S+1 140 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
e15 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 52,46 %
9 NS 3S E+4 -720 4 18.18
10 NS 5C N = 650 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
e14 Noelle Fosse -Marie Christine Remy 50,57 %
11 NS 2C W+2 -170 10 45.45
12 NS 1S N = 90 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
e10 Lydia Wildiers -Michel Paquot 57,39 %
19 NS 2P E+3 -200 7 31.82
20 NS 6C E = -1430 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
e.9 Helene Schyns -Antoinette Jourdain 38,83 %
21 NS 2P S+2 170 3 13.64
22 NS 4P N+1 450 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
e.8 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 44,70 %
23 NS 2P S+2 170 22 100.00
24 NS 3K N+2 150 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
e.7 Dominique Sassen -Lydia Luyten 54,55 %
25 NS 3C S-1 -50 6 27.27
26 NS 3P S+1 170 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
e.6 Andre Delacroix -Peter Masterson 47,16 %
27 NS 3S W = -400 6 27.27
28 NS 6P S = 1430 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
e.5 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 54,92 %
29 NS 3K E+1 -130 10 45.45
30 NS 4C E-2 100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
Total : 256,0 / 528 = 48,48 %
PAIRE N.6 Sandra Dallemagne -Marianne Borsu
e11 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 42,23 %
1 NS 3P S-2 -100 14 63.64
2 NS 3S N = 600 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
e10 Lydia Wildiers -Michel Paquot 57,39 %
3 NS 6C W = -1430 13 59.09
4 NS 3S N+2 660 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
e.6 Andre Delacroix -Peter Masterson 47,16 %
11 NS 2C W+2 -170 10 45.45
12 NS 1P N = 80 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
e.5 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 54,92 %
13 NS 3S W = -600 14 63.64
14 NS 6PcS-3 -500 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
e.4 Serge Alard -Stan Tabor 48,67 %
15 NS 3S W-1 50 17 77.27
16 NS 5TcS = 550 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
e.3 Fabienne Smit -Philippe de Lisius 55,87 %
17 NS 6C S-1 -50 2 9.09
18 NS 4C N = 620 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
e.2 Liliane Baptista -Jeanine Thys 53,60 %
19 NS 3P E+2 -200 7 31.82
20 NS 4C E = -620 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
e.1 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 49,81 %
21 NS 3P S+2 200 9 40.91
22 NS 4P N = 420 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
e15 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 52,46 %
23 NS 3P S-2 -200 3 13.64
24 NS 2K N+3 150 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
e14 Noelle Fosse -Marie Christine Remy 50,57 %
25 NS 2C S = 110 14 63.64
26 NS 4P S = 620 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
e13 Didier Collart -Veronique Englebienne 43,37 %
27 NS 3S W = -400 6 27.27
28 NS 5P S+1 680 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
e12 Marie Claire Vienne -Francine Dozin 55,87 %
29 NS 4PcS-2 -500 0 0.00
30 NS 3S W = -400 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 6,82 %
Total : 255,0 / 528 = 48,30 %
PAIRE N12 Sylviane Delbeke -Thierry Goemaere
e.8 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 44,70 %
1 NS 3C E = -140 7 31.82
2 NS 1S N-1 -100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
e.7 Dominique Sassen -Lydia Luyten 54,55 %
3 NS 6C W = -1430 13 59.09
4 NS 3S N+3 690 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
e.6 Andre Delacroix -Peter Masterson 47,16 %
5 NS 4CcS+2 1190 22 100.00
6 NS 4C N = 420 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
e.5 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 54,92 %
7 NS 2C S+1 140 14 63.64
8 NS 3P E-2 100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
e.4 Serge Alard -Stan Tabor 48,67 %
9 NS 6C W = -1430 1 4.55
10 NS 4C N+1 650 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
e.3 Fabienne Smit -Philippe de Lisius 55,87 %
11 NS 4C E+1 -450 0 0.00
12 NS 1S N-1 -100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
e.2 Liliane Baptista -Jeanine Thys 53,60 %
13 NS 3S E+1 -630 4 18.18
14 NS 4P S-1 -50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
e.1 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 49,81 %
15 NS 3K W = -110 8 36.36
16 NS 6T S-1 -50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
e12 Marie Claire Vienne -Francine Dozin 55,87 %
23 NS 1P S+1 110 17 77.27
24 NS 2K N+3 150 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
e11 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 42,23 %
25 NS 2C S = 110 14 63.64
26 NS 5P S-3 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
e10 Lydia Wildiers -Michel Paquot 57,39 %
27 NS 3S W-1 50 18 81.82
28 NS 6P S = 1430 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
e.9 Helene Schyns -Antoinette Jourdain 38,83 %
29 NS 3K E = -110 16 72.73
30 NS 3S E-1 50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
Total : 253,0 / 528 = 47,92 %
PAIRE N.4 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles
e.4 Serge Alard -Stan Tabor 48,67 %
7 NS 2T W = -90 6 27.27
8 NS 3C S-1 -50 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
e.3 Fabienne Smit -Philippe de Lisius 55,87 %
9 NS 6C W = -1430 1 4.55
10 NS 6C N-2 -200 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 6,82 %
e.2 Liliane Baptista -Jeanine Thys 53,60 %
11 NS 4C W = -420 2 9.09
12 NS 1P N-1 -100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
e.1 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 49,81 %
13 NS 4K W = -130 20 90.91
14 NS 4P S-1 -50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
e15 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 52,46 %
15 NS 3S E-2 100 21 95.45
16 NS 6T S-1 -50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
e14 Noelle Fosse -Marie Christine Remy 50,57 %
17 NS 6C S-1 -50 2 9.09
18 NS 4S N-3 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 4,55 %
e13 Didier Collart -Veronique Englebienne 43,37 %
19 NS 3K S-2 -100 20 90.91
20 NS 6C E-2 200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 95,45 %
e12 Marie Claire Vienne -Francine Dozin 55,87 %
21 NS 2P S+2 170 3 13.64
22 NS 4P N = 420 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
e11 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 42,23 %
23 NS 1P S+1 110 17 77.27
24 NS 3S S+2 460 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
e10 Lydia Wildiers -Michel Paquot 57,39 %
25 NS 3C S = 140 19 86.36
26 NS 4P N-1 -100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
e.9 Helene Schyns -Antoinette Jourdain 38,83 %
27 NS 3S W = -400 6 27.27
28 NS 6P S = 1430 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
e.8 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 44,70 %
29 NS 2P S = 110 22 100.00
30 NS 3S W = -400 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
Total : 248,0 / 528 = 46,97 %
PAIRE N.8 Chris Oostens -Michele Verhulst
e15 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 52,46 %
1 NS 3C E = -140 7 31.82
2 NS 2P E-1 50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
e14 Noelle Fosse -Marie Christine Remy 50,57 %
3 NS 3S W+4 -720 21 95.45
4 NS 3S N+2 660 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
e13 Didier Collart -Veronique Englebienne 43,37 %
5 NS 4C S = 620 13 59.09
6 NS 2C S+3 200 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
e12 Marie Claire Vienne -Francine Dozin 55,87 %
7 NS 2C S+1 140 14 63.64
8 NS 3C S = 140 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
e.8 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 44,70 %
15 NS 3K W = -110 8 36.36
16 NS 5T S = 400 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
e.7 Dominique Sassen -Lydia Luyten 54,55 %
17 NS 4C S+2 480 19 86.36
18 NS 3S N-1 -100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
e.6 Andre Delacroix -Peter Masterson 47,16 %
19 NS 4PcE = -790 1 4.55
20 NS 4C E+1 -650 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
e.5 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 54,92 %
21 NS 4P S+1 650 21 95.45
22 NS 4P N = 420 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
e.4 Serge Alard -Stan Tabor 48,67 %
23 NS 3K S-1 -100 7 31.82
24 NS 2K N+3 150 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
e.3 Fabienne Smit -Philippe de Lisius 55,87 %
25 NS 3C S-2 -100 0 0.00
26 NS 3P S+1 170 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
e.2 Liliane Baptista -Jeanine Thys 53,60 %
27 NS 2S W = -120 14 63.64
28 NS 4P S+1 650 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
e.1 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 49,81 %
29 NS 4K E = -130 10 45.45
30 NS 3S W-1 50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
Total : 243,0 / 528 = 46,02 %
PAIRE N11 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski
e.6 Andre Delacroix -Peter Masterson 47,16 %
1 NS 3C W = -140 7 31.82
2 NS 1S N = 90 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
e.5 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 54,92 %
3 NS 7C W = -2210 0 0.00
4 NS 3S N+2 660 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
e.4 Serge Alard -Stan Tabor 48,67 %
5 NS 4PcW-3 500 10 45.45
6 NS 3S S+2 460 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
e.3 Fabienne Smit -Philippe de Lisius 55,87 %
7 NS 3C S-1 -100 2 9.09
8 NS 2C S+1 140 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
e.2 Liliane Baptista -Jeanine Thys 53,60 %
9 NS 4C W+1 -650 18 81.82
10 NS 6C N-2 -200 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
e.1 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 49,81 %
11 NS 2P W+2 -170 10 45.45
12 NS 2S N-1 -100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
e15 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 52,46 %
13 NS 3S W = -600 14 63.64
14 NS 6PcS-3 -500 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
e11 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 42,23 %
21 NS 4P S = 620 15 68.18
22 NS 2P S+3 200 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
e10 Lydia Wildiers -Michel Paquot 57,39 %
23 NS 3S W+1 -630 0 0.00
24 NS 3S N+2 460 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
e.9 Helene Schyns -Antoinette Jourdain 38,83 %
25 NS 2C S = 110 14 63.64
26 NS 4P S = 620 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
e.8 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 44,70 %
27 NS 3S W-3 150 22 100.00
28 NS 4P S+2 680 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
e.7 Dominique Sassen -Lydia Luyten 54,55 %
29 NS 1S W+2 -150 4 18.18
30 NS 3S W = -400 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
Total : 231,0 / 528 = 43,75 %
PAIRE N13 Max Poupinel -Josiane Bonieux
e10 Lydia Wildiers -Michel Paquot 57,39 %
1 NS 2CcW+1 -570 0 0.00
2 NS 3S S-3 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
e.9 Helene Schyns -Antoinette Jourdain 38,83 %
3 NS 6S W+1 -1470 2 9.09
4 NS 3S N+3 690 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
e.8 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 44,70 %
5 NS 3C S+2 200 7 31.82
6 NS 4C N+1 450 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
e.7 Dominique Sassen -Lydia Luyten 54,55 %
7 NS 1C S+2 140 14 63.64
8 NS 4C S-2 -100 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
e.6 Andre Delacroix -Peter Masterson 47,16 %
9 NS 3S E+2 -660 16 72.73
10 NS 4C N+1 650 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
e.5 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 54,92 %
11 NS 2P W+2 -170 10 45.45
12 NS 2S N-1 -100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
e.4 Serge Alard -Stan Tabor 48,67 %
13 NS 3S E+1 -630 4 18.18
14 NS 4P S = 420 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
e.3 Fabienne Smit -Philippe de Lisius 55,87 %
15 NS 2K W+1 -110 8 36.36
16 NS 5PcE-2 500 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
e.2 Liliane Baptista -Jeanine Thys 53,60 %
17 NS 4P S = 420 6 27.27
18 NS 3C N+1 170 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
e13 Didier Collart -Veronique Englebienne 43,37 %
25 NS 1S N+2 150 22 100.00
26 NS 4P S-1 -100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
e12 Marie Claire Vienne -Francine Dozin 55,87 %
27 NS 3S W = -400 6 27.27
28 NS 6P S-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
e11 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 42,23 %
29 NS 3K E+1 -130 10 45.45
30 NS 3S W-1 50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
Total : 228,0 / 528 = 43,18 %
PAIRE N.9 Claire Derieuw -Chantal de Lichtervelde
e.2 Liliane Baptista -Jeanine Thys 53,60 %
1 NS 3C W-1 50 19 86.36
2 NS 1S N+1 120 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
e.1 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 49,81 %
3 NS 6S W = -1440 5 22.73
4 NS 3S N+2 660 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
e15 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 52,46 %
5 NS 4T E-3 150 2 9.09
6 NS 3C N+2 200 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
e14 Noelle Fosse -Marie Christine Remy 50,57 %
7 NS 4C S-1 -100 2 9.09
8 NS 4C S-2 -100 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 6,82 %
e13 Didier Collart -Veronique Englebienne 43,37 %
9 NS 5C W+1 -680 11 50.00
10 NS 4C N-1 -100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
e.9 Helene Schyns -Antoinette Jourdain 38,83 %
17 NS 4C S+1 450 11 50.00
18 NS 4C N = 620 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
e.8 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 44,70 %
19 NS 4PcE = -790 1 4.55
20 NS 4C E+2 -680 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
e.7 Dominique Sassen -Lydia Luyten 54,55 %
21 NS 2S N+2 180 6 27.27
22 NS 4P N+1 450 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
e.6 Andre Delacroix -Peter Masterson 47,16 %
23 NS 3K S-2 -200 3 13.64
24 NS 3S S+2 460 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
e.5 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 54,92 %
25 NS 2T N-1 -50 6 27.27
26 NS 3P S-2 -200 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
e.4 Serge Alard -Stan Tabor 48,67 %
27 NS 3S W-1 50 18 81.82
28 NS 4P S+2 680 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
e.3 Fabienne Smit -Philippe de Lisius 55,87 %
29 NS 3K E+1 -130 10 45.45
30 NS 3S W-2 100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
Total : 222,0 / 528 = 42,05 %
PAIRE e10 Lydia Wildiers -Michel Paquot
N13 Max Poupinel -Josiane Bonieux 43,18 %
1 EO 2CcW+1 -570 22 100.00
2 EO 3S S-3 -300 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 100,00 %
N.6 Sandra Dallemagne -Marianne Borsu 48,30 %
3 EO 6C W = -1430 9 40.91
4 EO 3S N+2 660 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
N14 Francoise Duren -Giuseppe Napoli 52,65 %
5 EO 4C S+1 650 5 22.73
6 EO 3S S+2 460 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
N15 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 57,58 %
9 EO 5C E+1 -680 11 50.00
10 EO 4C N+1 650 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
N.1 Sophie Tilemans -Grazia Neuenschwander 61,74 %
13 EO 3S E+1 -630 18 81.82
14 EO 4P S-1 -50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
N.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 59,66 %
17 EO 6C S-1 -50 20 90.91
18 EO 4C N-1 -100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
N10 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 48,48 %
19 EO 2P E+3 -200 15 68.18
20 EO 6C E = -1430 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
N.3 Sophie Noach -Colette Heerinckx 49,43 %
21 EO 4P S = 620 7 31.82
22 EO 2P N+2 170 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
N11 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 43,75 %
23 EO 3S W+1 -630 22 100.00
24 EO 3S N+2 460 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
N.4 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 46,97 %
25 EO 3C S = 140 3 13.64
26 EO 4P N-1 -100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
N12 Sylviane Delbeke -Thierry Goemaere 47,92 %
27 EO 3S W-1 50 4 18.18
28 EO 6P S = 1430 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
N.5 Patricia Bardy -Jeanine Bontemps 49,24 %
29 EO 4K E = -130 12 54.55
30 EO 3S W = -400 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
Total : 303,0 / 528 = 57,39 %
PAIRE e.3 Fabienne Smit -Philippe de Lisius
N10 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 48,48 %
3 EO 6C E = -1430 9 40.91
4 EO 3S N+2 660 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
N.3 Sophie Noach -Colette Heerinckx 49,43 %
5 EO 2C N+2 170 18 81.82
6 EO 3S S+2 460 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
N11 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 43,75 %
7 EO 3C S-1 -100 20 90.91
8 EO 2C S+1 140 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
N.4 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 46,97 %
9 EO 6C W = -1430 21 95.45
10 EO 6C N-2 -200 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 93,18 %
N12 Sylviane Delbeke -Thierry Goemaere 47,92 %
11 EO 4C E+1 -450 22 100.00
12 EO 1S N-1 -100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
N.5 Patricia Bardy -Jeanine Bontemps 49,24 %
13 EO 3S E = -600 8 36.36
14 EO 5P S-1 -50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
N13 Max Poupinel -Josiane Bonieux 43,18 %
15 EO 2K W+1 -110 14 63.64
16 EO 5PcE-2 500 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
N.6 Sandra Dallemagne -Marianne Borsu 48,30 %
17 EO 6C S-1 -50 20 90.91
18 EO 4C N = 620 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
N14 Francoise Duren -Giuseppe Napoli 52,65 %
19 EO 4C N-3 -150 7 31.82
20 EO 6C E-1 100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
N.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 53,03 %
21 EO 4P S-1 -100 22 100.00
22 EO 4P N+1 450 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
N.8 Chris Oostens -Michele Verhulst 46,02 %
25 EO 3C S-2 -100 22 100.00
26 EO 3P S+1 170 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
N.9 Claire Derieuw -Chantal de Lichtervelde 42,05 %
29 EO 3K E+1 -130 12 54.55
30 EO 3S W-2 100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
Total : 295,0 / 528 = 55,87 %
PAIRE e12 Marie Claire Vienne -Francine Dozin
N14 Francoise Duren -Giuseppe Napoli 52,65 %
1 EO 2C W = -110 10 45.45
2 EO 1S N-1 -100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
N.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 53,03 %
3 EO 3S W+4 -720 1 4.55
4 EO 3S N+3 690 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
N15 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 57,58 %
5 EO 4P E-2 100 22 100.00
6 EO 3S S+1 430 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
N.8 Chris Oostens -Michele Verhulst 46,02 %
7 EO 2C S+1 140 8 36.36
8 EO 3C S = 140 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
N.1 Sophie Tilemans -Grazia Neuenschwander 61,74 %
9 EO 4C W+2 -680 11 50.00
10 EO 4C N+1 650 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
N.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 59,66 %
13 EO 3S E = -600 8 36.36
14 EO 4P S-1 -50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
N.3 Sophie Noach -Colette Heerinckx 49,43 %
17 EO 4C S+1 450 11 50.00
18 EO 4C N-2 -200 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
N.4 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 46,97 %
21 EO 2P S+2 170 19 86.36
22 EO 4P N = 420 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
N12 Sylviane Delbeke -Thierry Goemaere 47,92 %
23 EO 1P S+1 110 5 22.73
24 EO 2K N+3 150 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
N.5 Patricia Bardy -Jeanine Bontemps 49,24 %
25 EO 3C S-1 -50 16 72.73
26 EO 4P S = 620 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
N13 Max Poupinel -Josiane Bonieux 43,18 %
27 EO 3S W = -400 16 72.73
28 EO 6P S-1 -100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
N.6 Sandra Dallemagne -Marianne Borsu 48,30 %
29 EO 4PcS-2 -500 22 100.00
30 EO 3S W = -400 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 93,18 %
Total : 295,0 / 528 = 55,87 %
PAIRE e.5 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed
N11 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 43,75 %
3 EO 7C W = -2210 22 100.00
4 EO 3S N+2 660 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
N12 Sylviane Delbeke -Thierry Goemaere 47,92 %
7 EO 2C S+1 140 8 36.36
8 EO 3P E-2 100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
N.5 Patricia Bardy -Jeanine Bontemps 49,24 %
9 EO 6C W-1 100 0 0.00
10 EO 4PcE-2 500 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
N13 Max Poupinel -Josiane Bonieux 43,18 %
11 EO 2P W+2 -170 12 54.55
12 EO 2S N-1 -100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
N.6 Sandra Dallemagne -Marianne Borsu 48,30 %
13 EO 3S W = -600 8 36.36
14 EO 6PcS-3 -500 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
N14 Francoise Duren -Giuseppe Napoli 52,65 %
15 EO 3K W = -110 14 63.64
16 EO 6TcS-1 -100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
N.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 53,03 %
17 EO 4C S+1 450 11 50.00
18 EO 4C N-1 -100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
N15 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 57,58 %
19 EO 3P E+1 -170 11 50.00
20 EO 4C E = -620 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
N.8 Chris Oostens -Michele Verhulst 46,02 %
21 EO 4P S+1 650 1 4.55
22 EO 4P N = 420 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
N.1 Sophie Tilemans -Grazia Neuenschwander 61,74 %
23 EO 1P S+1 110 5 22.73
24 EO 3K N+2 150 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
N.9 Claire Derieuw -Chantal de Lichtervelde 42,05 %
25 EO 2T N-1 -50 16 72.73
26 EO 3P S-2 -200 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
N10 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 48,48 %
29 EO 3K E+1 -130 12 54.55
30 EO 4C E-2 100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
Total : 290,0 / 528 = 54,92 %
PAIRE e.7 Dominique Sassen -Lydia Luyten
N12 Sylviane Delbeke -Thierry Goemaere 47,92 %
3 EO 6C W = -1430 9 40.91
4 EO 3S N+3 690 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
N13 Max Poupinel -Josiane Bonieux 43,18 %
7 EO 1C S+2 140 8 36.36
8 EO 4C S-2 -100 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
N14 Francoise Duren -Giuseppe Napoli 52,65 %
11 EO 3C E+1 -170 12 54.55
12 EO 2S W = -120 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
N.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 53,03 %
13 EO 3S E+1 -630 18 81.82
14 EO 4P S-1 -50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
N15 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 57,58 %
15 EO 2K W+1 -110 14 63.64
16 EO 4T S+1 150 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
N.8 Chris Oostens -Michele Verhulst 46,02 %
17 EO 4C S+2 480 3 13.64
18 EO 3S N-1 -100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
N.1 Sophie Tilemans -Grazia Neuenschwander 61,74 %
19 EO 4K S-5 -250 18 81.82
20 EO 4C E = -620 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
N.9 Claire Derieuw -Chantal de Lichtervelde 42,05 %
21 EO 2S N+2 180 16 72.73
22 EO 4P N+1 450 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
N.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 59,66 %
23 EO 3P S-1 -100 15 68.18
24 EO 3S S+2 460 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
N10 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 48,48 %
25 EO 3C S-1 -50 16 72.73
26 EO 3P S+1 170 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
N.3 Sophie Noach -Colette Heerinckx 49,43 %
27 EO 3S W-1 50 4 18.18
28 EO 5P S+1 680 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
N11 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 43,75 %
29 EO 1S W+2 -150 18 81.82
30 EO 3S W = -400 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
Total : 288,0 / 528 = 54,55 %
PAIRE e.2 Liliane Baptista -Jeanine Thys
N.9 Claire Derieuw -Chantal de Lichtervelde 42,05 %
1 EO 3C W-1 50 3 13.64
2 EO 1S N+1 120 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
N.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 59,66 %
3 EO 6C W = -1430 9 40.91
4 EO 3S N+2 660 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
N10 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 48,48 %
5 EO 5CcS = 850 2 9.09
6 EO 3S S+1 430 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
N.3 Sophie Noach -Colette Heerinckx 49,43 %
7 EO 2C S+1 140 8 36.36
8 EO 2C S-1 -50 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
N11 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 43,75 %
9 EO 4C W+1 -650 4 18.18
10 EO 6C N-2 -200 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
N.4 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 46,97 %
11 EO 4C W = -420 20 90.91
12 EO 1P N-1 -100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
N12 Sylviane Delbeke -Thierry Goemaere 47,92 %
13 EO 3S E+1 -630 18 81.82
14 EO 4P S-1 -50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
N.5 Patricia Bardy -Jeanine Bontemps 49,24 %
15 EO 3K W = -110 14 63.64
16 EO 5P E = -650 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
N13 Max Poupinel -Josiane Bonieux 43,18 %
17 EO 4P S = 420 16 72.73
18 EO 3C N+1 170 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
N.6 Sandra Dallemagne -Marianne Borsu 48,30 %
19 EO 3P E+2 -200 15 68.18
20 EO 4C E = -620 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
N.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 53,03 %
23 EO 2C W-1 100 10 45.45
24 EO 3S S+2 460 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
N.8 Chris Oostens -Michele Verhulst 46,02 %
27 EO 2S W = -120 8 36.36
28 EO 4P S+1 650 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
Total : 283,0 / 528 = 53,60 %
PAIRE e15 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
N.8 Chris Oostens -Michele Verhulst 46,02 %
1 EO 3C E = -140 15 68.18
2 EO 2P E-1 50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
N.1 Sophie Tilemans -Grazia Neuenschwander 61,74 %
3 EO 6C W = -1430 9 40.91
4 EO 2S N+2 180 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
N.9 Claire Derieuw -Chantal de Lichtervelde 42,05 %
5 EO 4T E-3 150 20 90.91
6 EO 3C N+2 200 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
N.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 59,66 %
7 EO 2C S+1 140 8 36.36
8 EO 2C S+2 170 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
N10 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 48,48 %
9 EO 3S E+4 -720 18 81.82
10 EO 5C N = 650 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
N.3 Sophie Noach -Colette Heerinckx 49,43 %
11 EO 4P W-1 50 1 4.55
12 EO 2S E-2 100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 6,82 %
N11 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 43,75 %
13 EO 3S W = -600 8 36.36
14 EO 6PcS-3 -500 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
N.4 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 46,97 %
15 EO 3S E-2 100 1 4.55
16 EO 6T S-1 -50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
N.5 Patricia Bardy -Jeanine Bontemps 49,24 %
19 EO 4K S-3 -150 7 31.82
20 EO 4C E = -620 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
N.6 Sandra Dallemagne -Marianne Borsu 48,30 %
23 EO 3P S-2 -200 19 86.36
24 EO 2K N+3 150 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
N.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 53,03 %
27 EO 3S W = -400 16 72.73
28 EO 4P S+2 680 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
N15 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 57,58 %
29 EO 3P S-2 -200 20 90.91
30 EO 3ScW-1 100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
Total : 277,0 / 528 = 52,46 %
PAIRE e14 Noelle Fosse -Marie Christine Remy
N15 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 57,58 %
1 EO 3C W = -140 15 68.18
2 EO 2S N = 120 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
N.8 Chris Oostens -Michele Verhulst 46,02 %
3 EO 3S W+4 -720 1 4.55
4 EO 3S N+2 660 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
N.1 Sophie Tilemans -Grazia Neuenschwander 61,74 %
5 EO 4C S = 620 9 40.91
6 EO 2S S+2 180 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
N.9 Claire Derieuw -Chantal de Lichtervelde 42,05 %
7 EO 4C S-1 -100 20 90.91
8 EO 4C S-2 -100 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 93,18 %
N.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 59,66 %
9 EO 3S W = -600 2 9.09
10 EO 5C N-2 -200 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
N10 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 48,48 %
11 EO 2C W+2 -170 12 54.55
12 EO 1S N = 90 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
N.3 Sophie Noach -Colette Heerinckx 49,43 %
13 EO 3S E = -600 8 36.36
14 EO 4P S-1 -50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
N.4 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 46,97 %
17 EO 6C S-1 -50 20 90.91
18 EO 4S N-3 -300 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 95,45 %
N.5 Patricia Bardy -Jeanine Bontemps 49,24 %
21 EO 4P S = 620 7 31.82
22 EO 4P N = 420 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
N.6 Sandra Dallemagne -Marianne Borsu 48,30 %
25 EO 2C S = 110 8 36.36
26 EO 4P S = 620 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
N14 Francoise Duren -Giuseppe Napoli 52,65 %
27 EO 3S W = -400 16 72.73
28 EO 4P S+2 680 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
N.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 53,03 %
29 EO 3P S-1 -100 4 18.18
30 EO 3S W-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
Total : 267,0 / 528 = 50,57 %
PAIRE e.1 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory
N.1 Sophie Tilemans -Grazia Neuenschwander 61,74 %
1 EO 3C E-1 50 3 13.64
2 EO 1S N+1 120 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
N.9 Claire Derieuw -Chantal de Lichtervelde 42,05 %
3 EO 6S W = -1440 17 77.27
4 EO 3S N+2 660 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
N.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 59,66 %
5 EO 4C N+1 650 5 22.73
6 EO 3S S+3 490 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
N10 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 48,48 %
7 EO 1K W-1 100 14 63.64
8 EO 2C S+1 140 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
N.3 Sophie Noach -Colette Heerinckx 49,43 %
9 EO 4C W+2 -680 11 50.00
10 EO 4C N-1 -100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
N11 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 43,75 %
11 EO 2P W+2 -170 12 54.55
12 EO 2S N-1 -100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
N.4 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 46,97 %
13 EO 4K W = -130 2 9.09
14 EO 4P S-1 -50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
N12 Sylviane Delbeke -Thierry Goemaere 47,92 %
15 EO 3K W = -110 14 63.64
16 EO 6T S-1 -50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
N.5 Patricia Bardy -Jeanine Bontemps 49,24 %
17 EO 4C S+1 450 11 50.00
18 EO 4C N-1 -100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
N.6 Sandra Dallemagne -Marianne Borsu 48,30 %
21 EO 3P S+2 200 13 59.09
22 EO 4P N = 420 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
N.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 53,03 %
25 EO 2T N-1 -50 16 72.73
26 EO 2P S+1 140 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
N.8 Chris Oostens -Michele Verhulst 46,02 %
29 EO 4K E = -130 12 54.55
30 EO 3S W-1 50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
Total : 263,0 / 528 = 49,81 %
PAIRE e.4 Serge Alard -Stan Tabor
N10 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 48,48 %
1 EO 2C W+2 -170 20 90.91
2 EO 1S N-2 -200 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
N11 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 43,75 %
5 EO 4PcW-3 500 12 54.55
6 EO 3S S+2 460 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
N.4 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 46,97 %
7 EO 2T W = -90 16 72.73
8 EO 3C S-1 -50 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
N12 Sylviane Delbeke -Thierry Goemaere 47,92 %
9 EO 6C W = -1430 21 95.45
10 EO 4C N+1 650 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
N.5 Patricia Bardy -Jeanine Bontemps 49,24 %
11 EO 2P W+2 -170 12 54.55
12 EO 1P N-1 -100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
N13 Max Poupinel -Josiane Bonieux 43,18 %
13 EO 3S E+1 -630 18 81.82
14 EO 4P S = 420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
N.6 Sandra Dallemagne -Marianne Borsu 48,30 %
15 EO 3S W-1 50 5 22.73
16 EO 5TcS = 550 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
N14 Francoise Duren -Giuseppe Napoli 52,65 %
17 EO 4C S+2 480 3 13.64
18 EO 4C N = 620 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
N.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 53,03 %
19 EO 3P E = -140 4 18.18
20 EO 6C E = -1430 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
N15 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 57,58 %
21 EO 4P S = 620 7 31.82
22 EO 4P N+1 450 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
N.8 Chris Oostens -Michele Verhulst 46,02 %
23 EO 3K S-1 -100 15 68.18
24 EO 2K N+3 150 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
N.9 Claire Derieuw -Chantal de Lichtervelde 42,05 %
27 EO 3S W-1 50 4 18.18
28 EO 4P S+2 680 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
Total : 257,0 / 528 = 48,67 %
PAIRE e.6 Andre Delacroix -Peter Masterson
N11 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 43,75 %
1 EO 3C W = -140 15 68.18
2 EO 1S N = 90 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
N12 Sylviane Delbeke -Thierry Goemaere 47,92 %
5 EO 4CcS+2 1190 0 0.00
6 EO 4C N = 420 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
N13 Max Poupinel -Josiane Bonieux 43,18 %
9 EO 3S E+2 -660 6 27.27
10 EO 4C N+1 650 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
N.6 Sandra Dallemagne -Marianne Borsu 48,30 %
11 EO 2C W+2 -170 12 54.55
12 EO 1P N = 80 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
N14 Francoise Duren -Giuseppe Napoli 52,65 %
13 EO 3S E+1 -630 18 81.82
14 EO 4P S-1 -50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
N.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 53,03 %
15 EO 3K W+1 -130 22 100.00
16 EO 5TcS = 550 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
N15 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 57,58 %
17 EO 4S S+1 460 6 27.27
18 EO 4C N-1 -100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
N.8 Chris Oostens -Michele Verhulst 46,02 %
19 EO 4PcE = -790 21 95.45
20 EO 4C E+1 -650 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
N.1 Sophie Tilemans -Grazia Neuenschwander 61,74 %
21 EO 2C S+3 200 13 59.09
22 EO 4P N = 420 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
N.9 Claire Derieuw -Chantal de Lichtervelde 42,05 %
23 EO 3K S-2 -200 19 86.36
24 EO 3S S+2 460 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
N.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 59,66 %
25 EO 2C S+1 140 3 13.64
26 EO 4P N = 620 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
N10 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 48,48 %
27 EO 3S W = -400 16 72.73
28 EO 6P S = 1430 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
Total : 249,0 / 528 = 47,16 %
PAIRE e.8 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
N12 Sylviane Delbeke -Thierry Goemaere 47,92 %
1 EO 3C E = -140 15 68.18
2 EO 1S N-1 -100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
N13 Max Poupinel -Josiane Bonieux 43,18 %
5 EO 3C S+2 200 15 68.18
6 EO 4C N+1 450 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
N14 Francoise Duren -Giuseppe Napoli 52,65 %
9 EO 3S E+3 -690 16 72.73
10 EO 4C N+1 650 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
N15 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 57,58 %
13 EO 6S E-2 200 0 0.00
14 EO 6S N-1 -50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
N.8 Chris Oostens -Michele Verhulst 46,02 %
15 EO 3K W = -110 14 63.64
16 EO 5T S = 400 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
N.1 Sophie Tilemans -Grazia Neuenschwander 61,74 %
17 EO 6S S = 990 0 0.00
18 EO 4C N = 620 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 6,82 %
N.9 Claire Derieuw -Chantal de Lichtervelde 42,05 %
19 EO 4PcE = -790 21 95.45
20 EO 4C E+2 -680 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
N.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 59,66 %
21 EO 4P S+1 650 1 4.55
22 EO 4P N = 420 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
N10 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 48,48 %
23 EO 2P S+2 170 0 0.00
24 EO 3K N+2 150 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
N.3 Sophie Noach -Colette Heerinckx 49,43 %
25 EO 2C S-1 -50 16 72.73
26 EO 3P S+1 170 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
N11 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 43,75 %
27 EO 3S W-3 150 0 0.00
28 EO 4P S+2 680 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
N.4 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 46,97 %
29 EO 2P S = 110 0 0.00
30 EO 3S W = -400 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
Total : 236,0 / 528 = 44,70 %
PAIRE e13 Didier Collart -Veronique Englebienne
N.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 53,03 %
1 EO 3T S-1 -50 6 27.27
2 EO 2K S-1 -100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
N15 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 57,58 %
3 EO 6S W = -1440 17 77.27
4 EO 3S N+3 690 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
N.8 Chris Oostens -Michele Verhulst 46,02 %
5 EO 4C S = 620 9 40.91
6 EO 2C S+3 200 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
N.1 Sophie Tilemans -Grazia Neuenschwander 61,74 %
7 EO 3C S+1 170 2 9.09
8 EO 2C S+1 140 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
N.9 Claire Derieuw -Chantal de Lichtervelde 42,05 %
9 EO 5C W+1 -680 11 50.00
10 EO 4C N-1 -100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
N.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 59,66 %
11 EO 3C E+1 -170 12 54.55
12 EO 1P N = 80 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
N.3 Sophie Noach -Colette Heerinckx 49,43 %
15 EO 2K W+1 -110 14 63.64
16 EO 4T S+1 150 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
N.4 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 46,97 %
19 EO 3K S-2 -100 2 9.09
20 EO 6C E-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 4,55 %
N.5 Patricia Bardy -Jeanine Bontemps 49,24 %
23 EO 2P S = 110 5 22.73
24 EO 3K N+2 150 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
N13 Max Poupinel -Josiane Bonieux 43,18 %
25 EO 1S N+2 150 0 0.00
26 EO 4P S-1 -100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
N.6 Sandra Dallemagne -Marianne Borsu 48,30 %
27 EO 3S W = -400 16 72.73
28 EO 5P S+1 680 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
N14 Francoise Duren -Giuseppe Napoli 52,65 %
29 EO 4K E-1 100 2 9.09
30 EO 3S W-1 50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
Total : 229,0 / 528 = 43,37 %
PAIRE e11 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve
N.6 Sandra Dallemagne -Marianne Borsu 48,30 %
1 EO 3P S-2 -100 8 36.36
2 EO 3S N = 600 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
N14 Francoise Duren -Giuseppe Napoli 52,65 %
3 EO 6C W = -1430 9 40.91
4 EO 3S N+2 660 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
N.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 53,03 %
5 EO 3C N+2 200 15 68.18
6 EO 3S S+2 460 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
N15 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 57,58 %
7 EO 4C N+1 650 0 0.00
8 EO 2C S = 110 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
N.1 Sophie Tilemans -Grazia Neuenschwander 61,74 %
11 EO 1S W-1 50 1 4.55
12 EO 2S N = 120 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 2,27 %
N.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 59,66 %
15 EO 2S E-1 50 5 22.73
16 EO 7TcS-2 -300 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
N.3 Sophie Noach -Colette Heerinckx 49,43 %
19 EO 5P E-2 200 0 0.00
20 EO 4C E+2 -680 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
N11 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 43,75 %
21 EO 4P S = 620 7 31.82
22 EO 2P S+3 200 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
N.4 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 46,97 %
23 EO 1P S+1 110 5 22.73
24 EO 3S S+2 460 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
N12 Sylviane Delbeke -Thierry Goemaere 47,92 %
25 EO 2C S = 110 8 36.36
26 EO 5P S-3 -300 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
N.5 Patricia Bardy -Jeanine Bontemps 49,24 %
27 EO 3S W = -400 16 72.73
28 EO 4P S+2 680 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
N13 Max Poupinel -Josiane Bonieux 43,18 %
29 EO 3K E+1 -130 12 54.55
30 EO 3S W-1 50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
Total : 223,0 / 528 = 42,23 %
PAIRE e.9 Helene Schyns -Antoinette Jourdain
N.5 Patricia Bardy -Jeanine Bontemps 49,24 %
1 EO 4C E-4 200 0 0.00
2 EO 1S N-1 -100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
N13 Max Poupinel -Josiane Bonieux 43,18 %
3 EO 6S W+1 -1470 20 90.91
4 EO 3S N+3 690 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
N14 Francoise Duren -Giuseppe Napoli 52,65 %
7 EO 4C N-1 -100 20 90.91
8 EO 2C S+2 170 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
N15 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 57,58 %
11 EO 2C E+1 -140 4 18.18
12 EO 1S W = -90 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
N.1 Sophie Tilemans -Grazia Neuenschwander 61,74 %
15 EO 3S E-2 100 1 4.55
16 EO 5TcS = 550 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 6,82 %
N.9 Claire Derieuw -Chantal de Lichtervelde 42,05 %
17 EO 4C S+1 450 11 50.00
18 EO 4C N = 620 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
N.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 59,66 %
19 EO 3P E+1 -170 11 50.00
20 EO 4C E = -620 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
N10 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 48,48 %
21 EO 2P S+2 170 19 86.36
22 EO 4P N+1 450 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
N.3 Sophie Noach -Colette Heerinckx 49,43 %
23 EO 1P S = 80 12 54.55
24 EO 3K N+2 150 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
N11 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 43,75 %
25 EO 2C S = 110 8 36.36
26 EO 4P S = 620 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
N.4 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 46,97 %
27 EO 3S W = -400 16 72.73
28 EO 6P S = 1430 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
N12 Sylviane Delbeke -Thierry Goemaere 47,92 %
29 EO 3K E = -110 6 27.27
30 EO 3S E-1 50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
Total : 205,0 / 528 = 38,83 %
|