B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 65,18 A.8 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat
--- 2 62,80 A.9 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige
--- 3 55,95 A.3 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor
--- 4 51,49 A.7 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere
--- 5 50,60 A.1 Francoise Turin -Serge Alard
--- 6 47,92 A10 Catherine de Moffarts -Marianne Borsu
--- 7 47,32 A.5 Pascale Ortegat -Yolande Davain
--- 8 46,43 A.4 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Myriam de Timary
--- 9 41,96 A.2 Christiane Huby -Michele Berrier
--- 10 30,36 A.6 Eliane de Ceuninck -Colette Heerinckx
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 61,90 a.1 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens
--- 2 58,93 a.4 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne
--- 3 52,68 a10 Claire Destin -Brigitte de Fauconval
--- 4 50,60 a.8 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys
--- 5 50,60 a.3 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens
--- 6 49,70 a.9 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Gerard Cooreman
--- 7 46,73 a.5 Noelle Fosse -Marie Claire Vienne
--- 8 46,13 a.2 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Teresa Dekoster
--- 9 44,94 a.6 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Simone Munsterhjelm
--- 10 37,80 a.7 Martine Decleve -Genevieve Moenaert
PAIRE A.8 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat
a.5 Noelle Fosse -Marie Claire Vienne 46,73 %
1 NS 4P N+2 480 13 92.86
2 NS 4P W+2 -480 5 35.71
3 NS 4C S+1 450 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
a.4 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 58,93 %
4 NS 3C N = 140 8 57.14
5 NS 3P N-1 -100 0 0.00
6 NS 3T S-1 -50 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
a.2 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Teresa Dekoster 46,13 %
7 NS 3P E+1 -170 5 35.71
8 NS 4P N = 420 6 42.86
9 NS 6C N = 980 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.1 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens 61,90 %
10 NS 2P S+1 140 5 35.71
11 NS 4PcW-3 500 14 100.00
12 NS 3C W+2 -200 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
a10 Claire Destin -Brigitte de Fauconval 52,68 %
13 NS 6C N = 1430 11 78.57
14 NS 4P W-2 100 13 92.86
15 NS 4C S = 620 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
a.8 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 50,60 %
22 NS 4P E-2 200 13 92.86
23 NS 4P N = 620 6 42.86
24 NS 4K W-1 50 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
a.7 Martine Decleve -Genevieve Moenaert 37,80 %
25 NS 3P N = 140 9 64.29
26 NS 3P N-1 -100 8 57.14
27 NS 4C N+2 480 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
a.6 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Simone Munsterhjelm 44,94 %
28 NS 3K S+2 150 14 100.00
29 NS 4P E+1 -650 1 7.14
30 NS 3S N = 400 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
Total : 219,0 / 336 = 65,18 %
PAIRE A.9 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige
a.7 Martine Decleve -Genevieve Moenaert 37,80 %
1 NS 4P N+1 450 9 64.29
2 NS 4P W+1 -450 11 78.57
3 NS 4C S = 420 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
a.6 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Simone Munsterhjelm 44,94 %
4 NS 2P E-2 200 10 71.43
5 NS 1P N+2 140 7 50.00
6 NS 2K E+1 -110 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.5 Noelle Fosse -Marie Claire Vienne 46,73 %
7 NS 4P E-1 100 14 100.00
8 NS 4P N = 420 6 42.86
9 NS 6C S = 980 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 50,60 %
10 NS 4P S = 620 11 78.57
11 NS 5C N-1 -50 0 0.00
12 NS 4C W-1 50 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
a.2 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Teresa Dekoster 46,13 %
13 NS 6C N = 1430 11 78.57
14 NS 3S E-2 100 13 92.86
15 NS 4C S = 620 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
a.1 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens 61,90 %
16 NS 4P W+1 -650 4 28.57
17 NS 3S N+2 460 7 50.00
18 NS 5KcE-3 500 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.9 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Gerard Cooreman 49,70 %
25 NS 3P N+1 170 13 92.86
26 NS 3P N-1 -100 8 57.14
27 NS 4C S = 420 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
a.8 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 50,60 %
28 NS 3T N-1 -100 6 42.86
29 NS 6P E-2 200 13 92.86
30 NS 2P N = 110 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
Total : 211,0 / 336 = 62,80 %
PAIRE A.3 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor
a.3 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 50,60 %
7 NS 4PcE = -790 0 0.00
8 NS 4P N = 420 6 42.86
9 NS 6C S = 980 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
a.2 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Teresa Dekoster 46,13 %
10 NS 4P S = 620 11 78.57
11 NS 4C S = 420 7 50.00
12 NS 2C W+2 -170 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.1 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens 61,90 %
13 NS 5C N+1 680 3 21.43
14 NS 2K E+1 -110 6 42.86
15 NS 3S S = 600 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 21,43 %
a10 Claire Destin -Brigitte de Fauconval 52,68 %
16 NS 4P W = -620 11 78.57
17 NS 3S N+3 490 13 92.86
18 NS 5T S = 600 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 85,71 %
a.9 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Gerard Cooreman 49,70 %
19 NS 3S W-1 100 11 78.57
20 NS 3S S+1 630 14 100.00
21 NS 4C W-1 50 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 80,95 %
a.7 Martine Decleve -Genevieve Moenaert 37,80 %
22 NS 3P W-1 100 5 35.71
23 NS 4P N+1 650 12 85.71
24 NS 3C S-1 -50 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
a.6 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Simone Munsterhjelm 44,94 %
25 NS 4C E-1 100 6 42.86
26 NS 3P N-1 -100 8 57.14
27 NS 4C N = 420 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
a.5 Noelle Fosse -Marie Claire Vienne 46,73 %
28 NS 3S N-3 -300 1 7.14
29 NS 4P E = -620 4 28.57
30 NS 3S S = 400 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
Total : 188,0 / 336 = 55,95 %
PAIRE A.7 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere
a.3 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 50,60 %
1 NS 4P N+2 480 13 92.86
2 NS 4P W+2 -480 5 35.71
3 NS 4C S = 420 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
a.1 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens 61,90 %
4 NS 2P E-1 100 3 21.43
5 NS 1P N+1 110 3 21.43
6 NS 2S W = -120 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
a10 Claire Destin -Brigitte de Fauconval 52,68 %
7 NS 3P E = -140 10 71.43
8 NS 4P N = 420 6 42.86
9 NS 6P S = 980 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
a.9 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Gerard Cooreman 49,70 %
10 NS 3K S-3 -300 0 0.00
11 NS 4C S = 420 7 50.00
12 NS 4C W = -420 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
a.7 Martine Decleve -Genevieve Moenaert 37,80 %
19 NS 4P E-2 200 14 100.00
20 NS 3S N-1 -100 2 14.29
21 NS 4C E-1 50 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
a.6 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Simone Munsterhjelm 44,94 %
22 NS 2S W-1 100 5 35.71
23 NS 4P N+1 650 12 85.71
24 NS 3C S-1 -50 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
a.5 Noelle Fosse -Marie Claire Vienne 46,73 %
25 NS 3P S-1 -50 2 14.29
26 NS 3P N-1 -100 8 57.14
27 NS 4C N = 420 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
a.4 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 58,93 %
28 NS 1S E-2 100 11 78.57
29 NS 6P E-1 100 8 57.14
30 NS 3S N = 400 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
Total : 173,0 / 336 = 51,49 %
PAIRE A.1 Francoise Turin -Serge Alard
a.1 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens 61,90 %
1 NS 4P N = 420 4 28.57
2 NS 4P W+2 -480 5 35.71
3 NS 4C S = 420 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
a10 Claire Destin -Brigitte de Fauconval 52,68 %
4 NS 4P E-3 300 13 92.86
5 NS 1P N+2 140 7 50.00
6 NS 1S E+1 -120 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.9 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Gerard Cooreman 49,70 %
7 NS 3P E = -140 10 71.43
8 NS 4P N+1 450 13 92.86
9 NS 5C S+1 480 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
a.8 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 50,60 %
10 NS 3T E-3 300 8 57.14
11 NS 4C S = 420 7 50.00
12 NS 4C W+1 -450 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
a.7 Martine Decleve -Genevieve Moenaert 37,80 %
13 NS 4C N+2 680 3 21.43
14 NS 1S E = -90 10 71.43
15 NS 4C S = 620 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
a.5 Noelle Fosse -Marie Claire Vienne 46,73 %
16 NS 4P W+1 -650 4 28.57
17 NS 3S N+2 460 7 50.00
18 NS 5TcS = 750 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
a.4 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 58,93 %
19 NS 4C E = -620 4 28.57
20 NS 4K S = 130 7 50.00
21 NS 4C W-1 50 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 50,60 %
22 NS 2S W-1 100 5 35.71
23 NS 4P N+1 650 12 85.71
24 NS 3P S-2 -100 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
Total : 170,0 / 336 = 50,60 %
PAIRE A10 Catherine de Moffarts -Marianne Borsu
a.9 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Gerard Cooreman 49,70 %
1 NS 4P N = 420 4 28.57
2 NS 4P W+2 -480 5 35.71
3 NS 4C S-1 -50 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
a.8 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 50,60 %
4 NS 3P E-1 100 3 21.43
5 NS 1P N+4 200 14 100.00
6 NS 2P S-2 -100 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
a.7 Martine Decleve -Genevieve Moenaert 37,80 %
7 NS 3P E = -140 10 71.43
8 NS 4P N+1 450 13 92.86
9 NS 6C S = 980 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 78,57 %
a.6 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Simone Munsterhjelm 44,94 %
10 NS 4P S-1 -100 2 14.29
11 NS 4C N = 420 7 50.00
12 NS 3T E+1 -130 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.4 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 58,93 %
13 NS 5C N+1 680 3 21.43
14 NS 2K E+2 -130 2 14.29
15 NS 4C N = 620 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 50,60 %
16 NS 4P W = -620 11 78.57
17 NS 3S N+2 460 7 50.00
18 NS 4T S+1 150 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
a.2 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Teresa Dekoster 46,13 %
19 NS 4C W = -620 4 28.57
20 NS 5K S-1 -100 2 14.29
21 NS 4C W-1 50 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
a10 Claire Destin -Brigitte de Fauconval 52,68 %
28 NS 3C E-1 50 8 57.14
29 NS 6P E-2 200 13 92.86
30 NS 3S S-1 -50 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
Total : 161,0 / 336 = 47,92 %
PAIRE A.5 Pascale Ortegat -Yolande Davain
a.8 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 50,60 %
1 NS 4P N = 420 4 28.57
2 NS 4P W+1 -450 11 78.57
3 NS 4C S = 420 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
a.7 Martine Decleve -Genevieve Moenaert 37,80 %
4 NS 2C N = 110 6 42.86
5 NS 1P N+3 170 11 78.57
6 NS 2K E = -90 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
a.5 Noelle Fosse -Marie Claire Vienne 46,73 %
13 NS 6C N = 1430 11 78.57
14 NS 2K E+1 -110 6 42.86
15 NS 4C S = 620 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
a.4 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 58,93 %
16 NS 4P W = -620 11 78.57
17 NS 3S N+1 430 1 7.14
18 NS 4PcN-3 -800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 50,60 %
19 NS 4C W-1 100 11 78.57
20 NS 2S N+1 150 12 85.71
21 NS 3C E = -140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
a.2 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Teresa Dekoster 46,13 %
22 NS 2S W-2 200 13 92.86
23 NS 4P N = 620 6 42.86
24 NS 3K W = -110 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
a.1 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens 61,90 %
25 NS 3P N+1 170 13 92.86
26 NS 3P N-1 -100 8 57.14
27 NS 4P S-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.9 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Gerard Cooreman 49,70 %
28 NS 3S S-3 -300 1 7.14
29 NS 4P E+1 -650 1 7.14
30 NS 2P N = 110 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 19,05 %
Total : 159,0 / 336 = 47,32 %
PAIRE A.4 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Myriam de Timary
a.6 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Simone Munsterhjelm 44,94 %
1 NS 4P N+1 450 9 64.29
2 NS 4P W = -420 14 100.00
3 NS 4C S-1 -50 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
a.4 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 58,93 %
10 NS 3S N+1 630 14 100.00
11 NS 4C N = 420 7 50.00
12 NS 4C E+1 -450 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 50,60 %
13 NS 6C N = 1430 11 78.57
14 NS 2P W+1 -140 0 0.00
15 NS 4C S = 620 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
a.2 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Teresa Dekoster 46,13 %
16 NS 3S W+2 -660 0 0.00
17 NS 3S N+3 490 13 92.86
18 NS 1S S+2 150 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
a.1 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens 61,90 %
19 NS 4C W = -620 4 28.57
20 NS 3K S+1 130 7 50.00
21 NS 4C W-1 50 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
a10 Claire Destin -Brigitte de Fauconval 52,68 %
22 NS 2S W-1 100 5 35.71
23 NS 3P N+2 200 2 14.29
24 NS 3C N-3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
a.8 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 50,60 %
25 NS 4P S-1 -50 2 14.29
26 NS 2P N = 110 14 100.00
27 NS 4C S = 420 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
a.7 Martine Decleve -Genevieve Moenaert 37,80 %
28 NS 1S E-2 100 11 78.57
29 NS 6P E-1 100 8 57.14
30 NS 3S S-1 -50 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
Total : 156,0 / 336 = 46,43 %
PAIRE A.2 Christiane Huby -Michele Berrier
a.2 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Teresa Dekoster 46,13 %
4 NS 4P E-3 300 13 92.86
5 NS 1P N+1 110 3 21.43
6 NS 3T S-1 -50 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
a.1 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens 61,90 %
7 NS 3P E+1 -170 5 35.71
8 NS 5C W-2 100 0 0.00
9 NS 6P S-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 11,90 %
a10 Claire Destin -Brigitte de Fauconval 52,68 %
10 NS 2P S+1 140 5 35.71
11 NS 4C S = 420 7 50.00
12 NS 4C W+1 -450 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.9 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Gerard Cooreman 49,70 %
13 NS 4C N+2 680 3 21.43
14 NS 2P W = -110 6 42.86
15 NS 4C S+1 650 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
a.8 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 50,60 %
16 NS 4P W+1 -650 4 28.57
17 NS 3S N+1 430 1 7.14
18 NS 2T N+3 150 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
a.6 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Simone Munsterhjelm 44,94 %
19 NS 4C W = -620 4 28.57
20 NS 3C N = 140 10 71.43
21 NS 3C E-1 50 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
a.5 Noelle Fosse -Marie Claire Vienne 46,73 %
22 NS 3P W-1 100 5 35.71
23 NS 4P N = 620 6 42.86
24 NS 4K W-2 100 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
a.4 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 58,93 %
25 NS 3P S = 140 9 64.29
26 NS 4K E = -130 2 14.29
27 NS 3S N = 400 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
Total : 141,0 / 336 = 41,96 %
PAIRE A.6 Eliane de Ceuninck -Colette Heerinckx
a10 Claire Destin -Brigitte de Fauconval 52,68 %
1 NS 2P N+3 200 0 0.00
2 NS 6S E = -990 0 0.00
3 NS 4C S-1 -50 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 4,76 %
a.9 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Gerard Cooreman 49,70 %
4 NS 2P E+1 -140 0 0.00
5 NS 1P N+3 170 11 78.57
6 NS 2S E-1 100 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
a.8 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 50,60 %
7 NS 4C S-2 -200 2 14.29
8 NS 4P S = 420 6 42.86
9 NS 5C S+1 480 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
a.6 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Simone Munsterhjelm 44,94 %
16 NS 4P W = -620 11 78.57
17 NS 3S N+2 460 7 50.00
18 NS 5T S-1 -100 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
a.5 Noelle Fosse -Marie Claire Vienne 46,73 %
19 NS 4C W = -620 4 28.57
20 NS 3K S-1 -100 2 14.29
21 NS 2P S-1 -100 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 19,05 %
a.4 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne 58,93 %
22 NS 3S W-1 100 5 35.71
23 NS 3P N+1 170 0 0.00
24 NS 3K W = -110 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 19,05 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 50,60 %
25 NS 4P N-1 -50 2 14.29
26 NS 2K S-5 -500 0 0.00
27 NS 4C S = 420 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
a.2 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Teresa Dekoster 46,13 %
28 NS 3C E = -140 4 28.57
29 NS 5P E-1 100 8 57.14
30 NS 2P N = 110 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
Total : 102,0 / 336 = 30,36 %
PAIRE a.1 Dilva Haym -Michel Lievens
A.1 Francoise Turin -Serge Alard 50,60 %
1 EO 4P N = 420 10 71.43
2 EO 4P W+2 -480 9 64.29
3 EO 4C S = 420 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
A.7 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 51,49 %
4 EO 2P E-1 100 11 78.57
5 EO 1P N+1 110 11 78.57
6 EO 2S W = -120 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
A.2 Christiane Huby -Michele Berrier 41,96 %
7 EO 3P E+1 -170 9 64.29
8 EO 5C W-2 100 14 100.00
9 EO 6P S-1 -50 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 88,10 %
A.8 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat 65,18 %
10 EO 2P S+1 140 9 64.29
11 EO 4PcW-3 500 0 0.00
12 EO 3C W+2 -200 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
A.3 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 55,95 %
13 EO 5C N+1 680 11 78.57
14 EO 2K E+1 -110 8 57.14
15 EO 3S S = 600 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 78,57 %
A.9 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 62,80 %
16 EO 4P W+1 -650 10 71.43
17 EO 3S N+2 460 7 50.00
18 EO 5KcE-3 500 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.4 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Myriam de Timary 46,43 %
19 EO 4C W = -620 10 71.43
20 EO 3K S+1 130 7 50.00
21 EO 4C W-1 50 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
A.5 Pascale Ortegat -Yolande Davain 47,32 %
25 EO 3P N+1 170 1 7.14
26 EO 3P N-1 -100 6 42.86
27 EO 4P S-1 -50 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 208,0 / 336 = 61,90 %
PAIRE a.4 Lydia Wildiers -Jean de Villenfagne
A.8 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat 65,18 %
4 EO 3C N = 140 6 42.86
5 EO 3P N-1 -100 14 100.00
6 EO 3T S-1 -50 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
A.4 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Myriam de Timary 46,43 %
10 EO 3S N+1 630 0 0.00
11 EO 4C N = 420 7 50.00
12 EO 4C E+1 -450 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
A10 Catherine de Moffarts -Marianne Borsu 47,92 %
13 EO 5C N+1 680 11 78.57
14 EO 2K E+2 -130 12 85.71
15 EO 4C N = 620 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
A.5 Pascale Ortegat -Yolande Davain 47,32 %
16 EO 4P W = -620 3 21.43
17 EO 3S N+1 430 13 92.86
18 EO 4PcN-3 -800 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
A.1 Francoise Turin -Serge Alard 50,60 %
19 EO 4C E = -620 10 71.43
20 EO 4K S = 130 7 50.00
21 EO 4C W-1 50 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
A.6 Eliane de Ceuninck -Colette Heerinckx 30,36 %
22 EO 3S W-1 100 9 64.29
23 EO 3P N+1 170 14 100.00
24 EO 3K W = -110 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 80,95 %
A.2 Christiane Huby -Michele Berrier 41,96 %
25 EO 3P S = 140 5 35.71
26 EO 4K E = -130 12 85.71
27 EO 3S N = 400 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
A.7 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 51,49 %
28 EO 1S E-2 100 3 21.43
29 EO 6P E-1 100 6 42.86
30 EO 3S N = 400 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
Total : 198,0 / 336 = 58,93 %
PAIRE a10 Claire Destin -Brigitte de Fauconval
A.6 Eliane de Ceuninck -Colette Heerinckx 30,36 %
1 EO 2P N+3 200 14 100.00
2 EO 6S E = -990 14 100.00
3 EO 4C S-1 -50 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 95,24 %
A.1 Francoise Turin -Serge Alard 50,60 %
4 EO 4P E-3 300 1 7.14
5 EO 1P N+2 140 7 50.00
6 EO 1S E+1 -120 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.7 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 51,49 %
7 EO 3P E = -140 4 28.57
8 EO 4P N = 420 8 57.14
9 EO 6P S = 980 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
A.2 Christiane Huby -Michele Berrier 41,96 %
10 EO 2P S+1 140 9 64.29
11 EO 4C S = 420 7 50.00
12 EO 4C W+1 -450 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.8 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat 65,18 %
13 EO 6C N = 1430 3 21.43
14 EO 4P W-2 100 1 7.14
15 EO 4C S = 620 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
A.3 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 55,95 %
16 EO 4P W = -620 3 21.43
17 EO 3S N+3 490 1 7.14
18 EO 5T S = 600 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 14,29 %
A.4 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Myriam de Timary 46,43 %
22 EO 2S W-1 100 9 64.29
23 EO 3P N+2 200 12 85.71
24 EO 3C N-3 -150 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
A10 Catherine de Moffarts -Marianne Borsu 47,92 %
28 EO 3C E-1 50 6 42.86
29 EO 6P E-2 200 1 7.14
30 EO 3S S-1 -50 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
Total : 177,0 / 336 = 52,68 %
PAIRE a.8 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys
A.5 Pascale Ortegat -Yolande Davain 47,32 %
1 EO 4P N = 420 10 71.43
2 EO 4P W+1 -450 3 21.43
3 EO 4C S = 420 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
A10 Catherine de Moffarts -Marianne Borsu 47,92 %
4 EO 3P E-1 100 11 78.57
5 EO 1P N+4 200 0 0.00
6 EO 2P S-2 -100 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
A.6 Eliane de Ceuninck -Colette Heerinckx 30,36 %
7 EO 4C S-2 -200 12 85.71
8 EO 4P S = 420 8 57.14
9 EO 5C S+1 480 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
A.1 Francoise Turin -Serge Alard 50,60 %
10 EO 3T E-3 300 6 42.86
11 EO 4C S = 420 7 50.00
12 EO 4C W+1 -450 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
A.2 Christiane Huby -Michele Berrier 41,96 %
16 EO 4P W+1 -650 10 71.43
17 EO 3S N+1 430 13 92.86
18 EO 2T N+3 150 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
A.8 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat 65,18 %
22 EO 4P E-2 200 1 7.14
23 EO 4P N = 620 8 57.14
24 EO 4K W-1 50 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
A.4 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Myriam de Timary 46,43 %
25 EO 4P S-1 -50 12 85.71
26 EO 2P N = 110 0 0.00
27 EO 4C S = 420 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
A.9 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 62,80 %
28 EO 3T N-1 -100 8 57.14
29 EO 6P E-2 200 1 7.14
30 EO 2P N = 110 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
Total : 170,0 / 336 = 50,60 %
PAIRE a.3 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens
A.7 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 51,49 %
1 EO 4P N+2 480 1 7.14
2 EO 4P W+2 -480 9 64.29
3 EO 4C S = 420 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
A.3 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 55,95 %
7 EO 4PcE = -790 14 100.00
8 EO 4P N = 420 8 57.14
9 EO 6C S = 980 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
A.9 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 62,80 %
10 EO 4P S = 620 3 21.43
11 EO 5C N-1 -50 14 100.00
12 EO 4C W-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
A.4 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Myriam de Timary 46,43 %
13 EO 6C N = 1430 3 21.43
14 EO 2P W+1 -140 14 100.00
15 EO 4C S = 620 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
A10 Catherine de Moffarts -Marianne Borsu 47,92 %
16 EO 4P W = -620 3 21.43
17 EO 3S N+2 460 7 50.00
18 EO 4T S+1 150 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
A.5 Pascale Ortegat -Yolande Davain 47,32 %
19 EO 4C W-1 100 3 21.43
20 EO 2S N+1 150 2 14.29
21 EO 3C E = -140 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
A.1 Francoise Turin -Serge Alard 50,60 %
22 EO 2S W-1 100 9 64.29
23 EO 4P N+1 650 2 14.29
24 EO 3P S-2 -100 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
A.6 Eliane de Ceuninck -Colette Heerinckx 30,36 %
25 EO 4P N-1 -50 12 85.71
26 EO 2K S-5 -500 14 100.00
27 EO 4C S = 420 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
Total : 170,0 / 336 = 50,60 %
PAIRE a.9 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Gerard Cooreman
A10 Catherine de Moffarts -Marianne Borsu 47,92 %
1 EO 4P N = 420 10 71.43
2 EO 4P W+2 -480 9 64.29
3 EO 4C S-1 -50 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
A.6 Eliane de Ceuninck -Colette Heerinckx 30,36 %
4 EO 2P E+1 -140 14 100.00
5 EO 1P N+3 170 3 21.43
6 EO 2S E-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
A.1 Francoise Turin -Serge Alard 50,60 %
7 EO 3P E = -140 4 28.57
8 EO 4P N+1 450 1 7.14
9 EO 5C S+1 480 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
A.7 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 51,49 %
10 EO 3K S-3 -300 14 100.00
11 EO 4C S = 420 7 50.00
12 EO 4C W = -420 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
A.2 Christiane Huby -Michele Berrier 41,96 %
13 EO 4C N+2 680 11 78.57
14 EO 2P W = -110 8 57.14
15 EO 4C S+1 650 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
A.3 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 55,95 %
19 EO 3S W-1 100 3 21.43
20 EO 3S S+1 630 0 0.00
21 EO 4C W-1 50 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 19,05 %
A.9 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 62,80 %
25 EO 3P N+1 170 1 7.14
26 EO 3P N-1 -100 6 42.86
27 EO 4C S = 420 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
A.5 Pascale Ortegat -Yolande Davain 47,32 %
28 EO 3S S-3 -300 13 92.86
29 EO 4P E+1 -650 13 92.86
30 EO 2P N = 110 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 80,95 %
Total : 167,0 / 336 = 49,70 %
PAIRE a.5 Noelle Fosse -Marie Claire Vienne
A.8 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat 65,18 %
1 EO 4P N+2 480 1 7.14
2 EO 4P W+2 -480 9 64.29
3 EO 4C S+1 450 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
A.9 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 62,80 %
7 EO 4P E-1 100 0 0.00
8 EO 4P N = 420 8 57.14
9 EO 6C S = 980 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
A.5 Pascale Ortegat -Yolande Davain 47,32 %
13 EO 6C N = 1430 3 21.43
14 EO 2K E+1 -110 8 57.14
15 EO 4C S = 620 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
A.1 Francoise Turin -Serge Alard 50,60 %
16 EO 4P W+1 -650 10 71.43
17 EO 3S N+2 460 7 50.00
18 EO 5TcS = 750 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
A.6 Eliane de Ceuninck -Colette Heerinckx 30,36 %
19 EO 4C W = -620 10 71.43
20 EO 3K S-1 -100 12 85.71
21 EO 2P S-1 -100 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 80,95 %
A.2 Christiane Huby -Michele Berrier 41,96 %
22 EO 3P W-1 100 9 64.29
23 EO 4P N = 620 8 57.14
24 EO 4K W-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
A.7 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 51,49 %
25 EO 3P S-1 -50 12 85.71
26 EO 3P N-1 -100 6 42.86
27 EO 4C N = 420 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
A.3 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 55,95 %
28 EO 3S N-3 -300 13 92.86
29 EO 4P E = -620 10 71.43
30 EO 3S S = 400 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
Total : 157,0 / 336 = 46,73 %
PAIRE a.2 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Teresa Dekoster
A.2 Christiane Huby -Michele Berrier 41,96 %
4 EO 4P E-3 300 1 7.14
5 EO 1P N+1 110 11 78.57
6 EO 3T S-1 -50 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
A.8 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat 65,18 %
7 EO 3P E+1 -170 9 64.29
8 EO 4P N = 420 8 57.14
9 EO 6C N = 980 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.3 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 55,95 %
10 EO 4P S = 620 3 21.43
11 EO 4C S = 420 7 50.00
12 EO 2C W+2 -170 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.9 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 62,80 %
13 EO 6C N = 1430 3 21.43
14 EO 3S E-2 100 1 7.14
15 EO 4C S = 620 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
A.4 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Myriam de Timary 46,43 %
16 EO 3S W+2 -660 14 100.00
17 EO 3S N+3 490 1 7.14
18 EO 1S S+2 150 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
A10 Catherine de Moffarts -Marianne Borsu 47,92 %
19 EO 4C W = -620 10 71.43
20 EO 5K S-1 -100 12 85.71
21 EO 4C W-1 50 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
A.5 Pascale Ortegat -Yolande Davain 47,32 %
22 EO 2S W-2 200 1 7.14
23 EO 4P N = 620 8 57.14
24 EO 3K W = -110 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A.6 Eliane de Ceuninck -Colette Heerinckx 30,36 %
28 EO 3C E = -140 10 71.43
29 EO 5P E-1 100 6 42.86
30 EO 2P N = 110 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
Total : 155,0 / 336 = 46,13 %
PAIRE a.6 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Simone Munsterhjelm
A.4 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Myriam de Timary 46,43 %
1 EO 4P N+1 450 5 35.71
2 EO 4P W = -420 0 0.00
3 EO 4C S-1 -50 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
A.9 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 62,80 %
4 EO 2P E-2 200 4 28.57
5 EO 1P N+2 140 7 50.00
6 EO 2K E+1 -110 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A10 Catherine de Moffarts -Marianne Borsu 47,92 %
10 EO 4P S-1 -100 12 85.71
11 EO 4C N = 420 7 50.00
12 EO 3T E+1 -130 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.6 Eliane de Ceuninck -Colette Heerinckx 30,36 %
16 EO 4P W = -620 3 21.43
17 EO 3S N+2 460 7 50.00
18 EO 5T S-1 -100 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
A.2 Christiane Huby -Michele Berrier 41,96 %
19 EO 4C W = -620 10 71.43
20 EO 3C N = 140 4 28.57
21 EO 3C E-1 50 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
A.7 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 51,49 %
22 EO 2S W-1 100 9 64.29
23 EO 4P N+1 650 2 14.29
24 EO 3C S-1 -50 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
A.3 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 55,95 %
25 EO 4C E-1 100 8 57.14
26 EO 3P N-1 -100 6 42.86
27 EO 4C N = 420 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A.8 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat 65,18 %
28 EO 3K S+2 150 0 0.00
29 EO 4P E+1 -650 13 92.86
30 EO 3S N = 400 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
Total : 151,0 / 336 = 44,94 %
PAIRE a.7 Martine Decleve -Genevieve Moenaert
A.9 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 62,80 %
1 EO 4P N+1 450 5 35.71
2 EO 4P W+1 -450 3 21.43
3 EO 4C S = 420 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
A.5 Pascale Ortegat -Yolande Davain 47,32 %
4 EO 2C N = 110 8 57.14
5 EO 1P N+3 170 3 21.43
6 EO 2K E = -90 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
A10 Catherine de Moffarts -Marianne Borsu 47,92 %
7 EO 3P E = -140 4 28.57
8 EO 4P N+1 450 1 7.14
9 EO 6C S = 980 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 21,43 %
A.1 Francoise Turin -Serge Alard 50,60 %
13 EO 4C N+2 680 11 78.57
14 EO 1S E = -90 4 28.57
15 EO 4C S = 620 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
A.7 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 51,49 %
19 EO 4P E-2 200 0 0.00
20 EO 3S N-1 -100 12 85.71
21 EO 4C E-1 50 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
A.3 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 55,95 %
22 EO 3P W-1 100 9 64.29
23 EO 4P N+1 650 2 14.29
24 EO 3C S-1 -50 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
A.8 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat 65,18 %
25 EO 3P N = 140 5 35.71
26 EO 3P N-1 -100 6 42.86
27 EO 4C N+2 480 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
A.4 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Myriam de Timary 46,43 %
28 EO 1S E-2 100 3 21.43
29 EO 6P E-1 100 6 42.86
30 EO 3S S-1 -50 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
Total : 127,0 / 336 = 37,80 %
|