B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 57,39 A.7 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker
--- 2 56,63 A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor
--- ~ 56,63 B.5 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin
--- 4 56,06 B.6 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson
--- 5 54,55 B.7 Philippe van der Gracht -Alexandre Viot
--- 6 53,41 A.6 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander
--- 7 53,22 B.4 Mercedes Steed -Myriam de Timary
--- 8 48,11 A.1 Fifi Englund -Sophie Tilemans
--- 9 47,16 B.2 Claire Derieuw -Brigitte Brusselmans
--- 10 45,45 B.1 Gaetan van de Werve -Thomas Brusselmans
--- 11 43,94 B.3 Lydia Wildiers -Giuseppe Napoli
--- 12 43,56 A.3 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe
--- 13 42,23 A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois
--- 14 41,67 A.5 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 58,14 a.4 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman
--- 2 57,39 b.1 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys
--- ~ 57,01 a.7 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens
--- 4 54,73 b.7 Pascale Ortegat -Jean de Villenfagne
--- 5 52,08 b.5 Francoise Duren -Fabienne Smit
--- 6 51,52 a.5 Danielle Wybauw -Helene Schyns
--- 7 50,76 a.2 Marianne Falla -Noelle Fosse
--- 8 48,67 a.3 Edith Close -Jan Sassen
--- 9 48,30 a.1 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger
--- 10 47,54 b.2 Olivier Paternostre -Diane Emsens
--- 11 45,64 b.6 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger
--- 12 44,51 b.4 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm
--- 13 42,61 a.6 Prisca Tondreau -Chantal de Lichtervelde
--- 14 41,10 b.3 Paul Gatel -Philippe Steyt
PAIRE A.7 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker
a.6 Prisca Tondreau -Chantal de Lichtervelde 42,61 %
1 NS 2C W-1 50 22 100.00
2 NS 2C S = 110 18 81.82
3 NS 2P N = 110 12 54.55
4 NS 4C W-1 100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a.5 Danielle Wybauw -Helene Schyns 51,52 %
5 NS 3S S+1 630 11 50.00
6 NS 3P N+1 170 11 50.00
7 NS 2P S+1 140 15 68.18
8 NS 3S W+2 -460 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.4 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman 58,14 %
9 NS 6P N+1 1010 13 59.09
10 NS 2S W-1 100 19 86.36
11 NS 3S N-2 -100 2 9.09
12 NS 4P N+1 650 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.3 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 48,67 %
13 NS 1S S+1 120 18 81.82
14 NS 3S E-2 100 8 36.36
15 NS 1S S+1 120 18 81.82
16 NS 2C N+1 140 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.2 Marianne Falla -Noelle Fosse 50,76 %
17 NS 2C S+2 170 20 90.91
18 NS 2T W-2 100 17 77.27
19 NS 4PcE = -790 0 0.00
20 NS 2C E+1 -140 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 46,59 %
a.7 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 57,01 %
25 NS 2P S+2 170 19 86.36
26 NS 2K S-2 -200 2 9.09
27 NS 2P N = 110 17 77.27
28 NS 3S N-1 -100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
Total : 303,0 / 528 = 57,39 %
PAIRE A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor
a.7 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 57,01 %
1 NS 2C W = -110 11 50.00
2 NS 4PcW-2 300 21 95.45
3 NS 3S S-1 -50 6 27.27
4 NS 3C W-1 100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a.6 Prisca Tondreau -Chantal de Lichtervelde 42,61 %
5 NS 3S S+2 660 19 86.36
6 NS 2P N+2 170 11 50.00
7 NS 4KcE-4 1100 22 100.00
8 NS 3S W+3 -490 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 60,23 %
a.4 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman 58,14 %
13 NS 1S W-2 200 22 100.00
14 NS 3S E-1 50 1 4.55
15 NS 1S S+1 120 18 81.82
16 NS 2C N+1 140 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a.3 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 48,67 %
17 NS 2S S-1 -50 3 13.64
18 NS 2C N-1 -100 8 36.36
19 NS 3T S-1 -50 16 72.73
20 NS 3C E = -140 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
a.2 Marianne Falla -Noelle Fosse 50,76 %
21 NS 3C S+1 170 21 95.45
22 NS 3S E-1 100 17 77.27
23 NS 2P N+1 140 19 86.36
24 NS 2C W+2 -170 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.1 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger 48,30 %
25 NS 2P S+1 140 8 36.36
26 NS 2P E = -110 14 63.64
27 NS 3P N-1 -50 4 18.18
28 NS 3ScE-3 500 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
Total : 299,0 / 528 = 56,63 %
PAIRE B.5 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin
b.2 Olivier Paternostre -Diane Emsens 47,54 %
1 NS 2S W+2 -180 2 9.09
2 NS 1P E+1 -110 6 27.27
3 NS 3T N+1 130 17 77.27
4 NS 4C W-1 100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 42,05 %
b.1 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 57,39 %
5 NS 3S S+1 630 11 50.00
6 NS 3P N = 140 6 27.27
7 NS 3T W+1 -130 2 9.09
8 NS 3S W+2 -460 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
b.7 Pascale Ortegat -Jean de Villenfagne 54,73 %
9 NS 6S S+1 1020 22 100.00
10 NS 2K E+1 -110 13 59.09
11 NS 4CcE-2 300 20 90.91
12 NS 4P N+1 650 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 78,41 %
b.5 Francoise Duren -Fabienne Smit 52,08 %
17 NS 1S E-1 50 8 36.36
18 NS 2S E = -120 4 18.18
19 NS 3T S = 110 21 95.45
20 NS 4P W-2 200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
b.4 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm 44,51 %
21 NS 4C S-1 -100 4 18.18
22 NS 2P S = 110 20 90.91
23 NS 3K W = -110 6 27.27
24 NS 1S N+1 120 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
b.3 Paul Gatel -Philippe Steyt 41,10 %
25 NS 1S S+2 150 14 63.64
26 NS 3T E = -110 14 63.64
27 NS 2P N = 110 17 77.27
28 NS 4T E-2 100 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
Total : 299,0 / 528 = 56,63 %
PAIRE B.6 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson
b.4 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm 44,51 %
1 NS 2C W = -110 11 50.00
2 NS 4PcE-2 300 21 95.45
3 NS 1S S = 90 10 45.45
4 NS 4C W-1 100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
b.3 Paul Gatel -Philippe Steyt 41,10 %
5 NS 3S N+2 660 19 86.36
6 NS 4P N+1 450 21 95.45
7 NS 3P S = 140 15 68.18
8 NS 3S W+2 -460 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
b.2 Olivier Paternostre -Diane Emsens 47,54 %
9 NS 6P N+1 1010 13 59.09
10 NS 1S W+1 -120 6 27.27
11 NS 2P N = 110 15 68.18
12 NS 4P N+1 650 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
b.1 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 57,39 %
13 NS 1S S = 90 13 59.09
14 NS 4P E-4 200 22 100.00
15 NS 1S N-1 -100 1 4.55
16 NS 2C N+1 140 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
b.6 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 45,64 %
21 NS 3C S = 140 16 72.73
22 NS 3P S-1 -50 13 59.09
23 NS 3C E-3 300 22 100.00
24 NS 1S N-1 -50 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 67,05 %
b.5 Francoise Duren -Fabienne Smit 52,08 %
25 NS 1S S+1 120 4 18.18
26 NS 2S E+1 -150 7 31.82
27 NS 4CcS-2 -300 0 0.00
28 NS 3P W-1 50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 19,32 %
Total : 296,0 / 528 = 56,06 %
PAIRE B.7 Philippe van der Gracht -Alexandre Viot
b.6 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 45,64 %
1 NS 3P N-1 -50 20 90.91
2 NS 4P E-2 100 16 72.73
3 NS 3S N-1 -50 6 27.27
4 NS 4C W-2 200 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 71,59 %
b.5 Francoise Duren -Fabienne Smit 52,08 %
5 NS 5T N = 600 5 22.73
6 NS 3P N = 140 6 27.27
7 NS 3P S-1 -100 9 40.91
8 NS 3S W+2 -460 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
b.4 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm 44,51 %
9 NS 6P N+1 1010 13 59.09
10 NS 2S W-1 100 19 86.36
11 NS 3S N-1 -50 9 40.91
12 NS 6S S-1 -100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 48,86 %
b.3 Paul Gatel -Philippe Steyt 41,10 %
13 NS 1S S+1 120 18 81.82
14 NS 3P E-2 100 8 36.36
15 NS 1S N+1 120 18 81.82
16 NS 2P E = -110 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
b.2 Olivier Paternostre -Diane Emsens 47,54 %
17 NS 2C N-1 -50 3 13.64
18 NS 3S E-1 50 13 59.09
19 NS 4T S-1 -50 16 72.73
20 NS 3K S = 110 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 55,68 %
b.7 Pascale Ortegat -Jean de Villenfagne 54,73 %
25 NS 2P S+2 170 19 86.36
26 NS 2S E-1 100 20 90.91
27 NS 3K E+1 -130 2 9.09
28 NS 4PcW-1 100 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
Total : 288,0 / 528 = 54,55 %
PAIRE A.6 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander
a.4 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman 58,14 %
1 NS 2C W = -110 11 50.00
2 NS 1P E+2 -140 2 9.09
3 NS 3S N-2 -100 1 4.55
4 NS 4C W = -620 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
a.3 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 48,67 %
5 NS 3S S+1 630 11 50.00
6 NS 4P N+1 450 21 95.45
7 NS 3P S-1 -100 9 40.91
8 NS 3S E+2 -460 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.2 Marianne Falla -Noelle Fosse 50,76 %
9 NS 6P N+1 1010 13 59.09
10 NS 3S W-1 100 19 86.36
11 NS 3S N-1 -50 9 40.91
12 NS 4P N+1 650 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
a.1 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger 48,30 %
13 NS 2P S-2 -200 0 0.00
14 NS 4P E-3 150 17 77.27
15 NS 1S S+1 120 18 81.82
16 NS 3C S = 140 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 57,95 %
a.6 Prisca Tondreau -Chantal de Lichtervelde 42,61 %
21 NS 3P W-2 100 12 54.55
22 NS 2P S-1 -50 13 59.09
23 NS 2K W = -90 10 45.45
24 NS 1S N = 90 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a.5 Danielle Wybauw -Helene Schyns 51,52 %
25 NS 1S S+2 150 14 63.64
26 NS 2P E = -110 14 63.64
27 NS 2P N = 110 17 77.27
28 NS 3P W-2 100 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
Total : 282,0 / 528 = 53,41 %
PAIRE B.4 Mercedes Steed -Myriam de Timary
b.7 Pascale Ortegat -Jean de Villenfagne 54,73 %
1 NS 2C W = -110 11 50.00
2 NS 3S W-1 50 11 50.00
3 NS 3S N-2 -100 1 4.55
4 NS 4C W = -620 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 28,41 %
b.6 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 45,64 %
5 NS 3S S+2 660 19 86.36
6 NS 4P N = 420 16 72.73
7 NS 3P S-1 -100 9 40.91
8 NS 3S E+2 -460 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
b.4 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm 44,51 %
13 NS 2S S-1 -100 9 40.91
14 NS 4P E-3 150 17 77.27
15 NS 1S S = 90 9 40.91
16 NS 2C S+1 140 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 57,95 %
b.3 Paul Gatel -Philippe Steyt 41,10 %
17 NS 2C N+1 140 18 81.82
18 NS 2S E-2 100 17 77.27
19 NS 4T S-1 -50 16 72.73
20 NS 3K N = 110 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
b.2 Olivier Paternostre -Diane Emsens 47,54 %
21 NS 4C S-2 -200 0 0.00
22 NS 2P S+1 140 22 100.00
23 NS 3P N = 140 19 86.36
24 NS 2CcW+2 -670 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 46,59 %
b.1 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 57,39 %
25 NS 1S S = 90 2 9.09
26 NS 4P E-1 100 20 90.91
27 NS 2P N = 110 17 77.27
28 NS 3P W = -140 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 46,59 %
Total : 281,0 / 528 = 53,22 %
PAIRE A.1 Fifi Englund -Sophie Tilemans
a.1 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger 48,30 %
1 NS 2C W = -110 11 50.00
2 NS 1S E+1 -120 4 18.18
3 NS 2P N+1 140 21 95.45
4 NS 4C W-1 100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.7 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 57,01 %
5 NS 3S N+2 660 19 86.36
6 NS 4P N-1 -50 0 0.00
7 NS 4K E-2 200 18 81.82
8 NS 5T W = -400 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a.6 Prisca Tondreau -Chantal de Lichtervelde 42,61 %
9 NS 6P N+1 1010 13 59.09
10 NS 2P W = -110 13 59.09
11 NS 2P N = 110 15 68.18
12 NS 4P N+1 650 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
a.5 Danielle Wybauw -Helene Schyns 51,52 %
13 NS 1T W+2 -110 4 18.18
14 NS 2P E-2 100 8 36.36
15 NS 1P W = -80 4 18.18
16 NS 2P E = -110 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.4 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman 58,14 %
17 NS 1S E-1 50 8 36.36
18 NS 3S E = -400 0 0.00
19 NS 4TcS-1 -100 10 45.45
20 NS 2T E+1 -110 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a.3 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 48,67 %
21 NS 3C S-1 -100 4 18.18
22 NS 4T E = -130 8 36.36
23 NS 3C E-1 100 14 63.64
24 NS 1S N+1 120 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
Total : 254,0 / 528 = 48,11 %
PAIRE B.2 Claire Derieuw -Brigitte Brusselmans
b.2 Olivier Paternostre -Diane Emsens 47,54 %
5 NS 3S S+1 630 11 50.00
6 NS 4P N = 420 16 72.73
7 NS 1S E+1 -120 4 18.18
8 NS 3S E+2 -460 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
b.1 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 57,39 %
9 NS 6P N+1 1010 13 59.09
10 NS 2S W+1 -150 0 0.00
11 NS 2P N-1 -50 9 40.91
12 NS 6P N-1 -100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
b.7 Pascale Ortegat -Jean de Villenfagne 54,73 %
13 NS 2S S-1 -100 9 40.91
14 NS 3S E-3 150 17 77.27
15 NS 1S N-1 -100 1 4.55
16 NS 3C N-1 -50 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 39,77 %
b.6 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 45,64 %
17 NS 1S E-1 50 8 36.36
18 NS 3C N-1 -100 8 36.36
19 NS 3K E+2 -150 5 22.73
20 NS 3K N = 110 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
b.5 Francoise Duren -Fabienne Smit 52,08 %
21 NS 3C S+1 170 21 95.45
22 NS 5T W-1 100 17 77.27
23 NS 3P N-1 -100 8 36.36
24 NS 1S N = 90 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 69,32 %
b.4 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm 44,51 %
25 NS 1S S+3 180 22 100.00
26 NS 1P E+2 -140 10 45.45
27 NS 2P N = 110 17 77.27
28 NS 3K N-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 55,68 %
Total : 249,0 / 528 = 47,16 %
PAIRE B.1 Gaetan van de Werve -Thomas Brusselmans
b.1 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 57,39 %
1 NS 2C W = -110 11 50.00
2 NS 4P E-1 50 11 50.00
3 NS 1S S+1 120 14 63.64
4 NS 4C W-2 200 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
b.7 Pascale Ortegat -Jean de Villenfagne 54,73 %
5 NS 3S S = 600 5 22.73
6 NS 2P N+1 140 6 27.27
7 NS 4P S-2 -200 0 0.00
8 NS 4PcS-2 -300 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
b.6 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 45,64 %
9 NS 6P N+1 1010 13 59.09
10 NS 2S W = -120 6 27.27
11 NS 3S N-2 -100 2 9.09
12 NS 6P N-1 -100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 26,14 %
b.5 Francoise Duren -Fabienne Smit 52,08 %
13 NS 1S S = 90 13 59.09
14 NS 4P E-2 100 8 36.36
15 NS 1S N = 90 9 40.91
16 NS 2P E = -110 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
b.4 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm 44,51 %
17 NS 1S S+1 120 16 72.73
18 NS 2C N-1 -100 8 36.36
19 NS 4K E+1 -150 5 22.73
20 NS 3K S = 110 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
b.3 Paul Gatel -Philippe Steyt 41,10 %
21 NS 3C S = 140 16 72.73
22 NS 4P S-2 -100 10 45.45
23 NS 3C E+1 -170 1 4.55
24 NS 2S N = 120 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 53,41 %
Total : 240,0 / 528 = 45,45 %
PAIRE B.3 Lydia Wildiers -Giuseppe Napoli
b.5 Francoise Duren -Fabienne Smit 52,08 %
1 NS 2C W = -110 11 50.00
2 NS 2P E-1 50 11 50.00
3 NS 2P N+1 140 21 95.45
4 NS 4C W-1 100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
b.3 Paul Gatel -Philippe Steyt 41,10 %
9 NS 5P N+2 510 2 9.09
10 NS 2S E = -120 6 27.27
11 NS 3S N-2 -100 2 9.09
12 NS 4P N+1 650 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
b.2 Olivier Paternostre -Diane Emsens 47,54 %
13 NS 1S S+1 120 18 81.82
14 NS 4P E-3 150 17 77.27
15 NS 1S S = 90 9 40.91
16 NS 3C N = 140 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
b.1 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 57,39 %
17 NS 2C N = 110 13 59.09
18 NS 2S E+1 -150 2 9.09
19 NS 3K E+3 -170 2 9.09
20 NS 3C E = -140 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 23,86 %
b.7 Pascale Ortegat -Jean de Villenfagne 54,73 %
21 NS 3P W-1 50 9 40.91
22 NS 3T E+2 -150 4 18.18
23 NS 3C E = -140 4 18.18
24 NS 2C W = -110 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 26,14 %
b.6 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 45,64 %
25 NS 2C N+1 140 8 36.36
26 NS 2S E-1 100 20 90.91
27 NS 3K E-1 50 8 36.36
28 NS 3P W-2 100 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 55,68 %
Total : 232,0 / 528 = 43,94 %
PAIRE A.3 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe
a.5 Danielle Wybauw -Helene Schyns 51,52 %
1 NS 2C W = -110 11 50.00
2 NS 3C S-3 -300 0 0.00
3 NS 3T N+1 130 17 77.27
4 NS 2C W-1 100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.3 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 48,67 %
9 NS 4P N+3 510 2 9.09
10 NS 2S W = -120 6 27.27
11 NS 2P N+1 140 18 81.82
12 NS 4P N+1 650 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.2 Marianne Falla -Noelle Fosse 50,76 %
13 NS 2T W+1 -110 4 18.18
14 NS 3S E-2 100 8 36.36
15 NS 1S S+1 120 18 81.82
16 NS 3C N = 140 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.1 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger 48,30 %
17 NS 2C S+3 200 22 100.00
18 NS 3T W-1 50 13 59.09
19 NS 4TcS-1 -100 10 45.45
20 NS 3C E = -140 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 55,68 %
a.7 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 57,01 %
21 NS 3C S-1 -100 4 18.18
22 NS 4K E+1 -150 4 18.18
23 NS 3C E+1 -170 1 4.55
24 NS 2P W-1 50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.6 Prisca Tondreau -Chantal de Lichtervelde 42,61 %
25 NS 1S S+2 150 14 63.64
26 NS 1S S-3 -300 0 0.00
27 NS 3K E-1 50 8 36.36
28 NS 4P W-2 100 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 39,77 %
Total : 230,0 / 528 = 43,56 %
PAIRE A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois
a.2 Marianne Falla -Noelle Fosse 50,76 %
5 NS 3K S = 110 2 9.09
6 NS 4P N = 420 16 72.73
7 NS 4K E-3 300 20 90.91
8 NS 3S E+3 -490 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 44,32 %
a.1 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger 48,30 %
9 NS 6P N+1 1010 13 59.09
10 NS 2S W = -120 6 27.27
11 NS 3S N = 400 22 100.00
12 NS 4P N+1 650 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
a.7 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 57,01 %
13 NS 2T W+1 -110 4 18.18
14 NS 2P E-1 50 1 4.55
15 NS 1S N = 90 9 40.91
16 NS 2P E+3 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
a.6 Prisca Tondreau -Chantal de Lichtervelde 42,61 %
17 NS 3C N-2 -100 0 0.00
18 NS 3T W-3 150 21 95.45
19 NS 3T S = 110 21 95.45
20 NS 2C E+1 -140 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.5 Danielle Wybauw -Helene Schyns 51,52 %
21 NS 2P W-1 50 9 40.91
22 NS 5T E = -600 0 0.00
23 NS 3C E-1 100 14 63.64
24 NS 2P W-1 50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a.4 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman 58,14 %
25 NS 1S S-2 -100 0 0.00
26 NS 2S E+1 -150 7 31.82
27 NS 1S W-1 50 8 36.36
28 NS 3K N = 110 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 39,77 %
Total : 223,0 / 528 = 42,23 %
PAIRE A.5 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza
a.2 Marianne Falla -Noelle Fosse 50,76 %
1 NS 3S W+1 -430 0 0.00
2 NS 2P E-1 50 11 50.00
3 NS 2S N-1 -50 6 27.27
4 NS 4C W = -620 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 21,59 %
a.1 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger 48,30 %
5 NS 3S N-1 -100 0 0.00
6 NS 2P N = 110 2 9.09
7 NS 3P S-1 -100 9 40.91
8 NS 3S E+2 -460 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a.7 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 57,01 %
9 NS 5P N+2 510 2 9.09
10 NS 2S W-1 100 19 86.36
11 NS 2P N-1 -50 9 40.91
12 NS 4P N+1 650 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.5 Danielle Wybauw -Helene Schyns 51,52 %
17 NS 2C S = 110 13 59.09
18 NS 3T W-3 150 21 95.45
19 NS 4TcS-1 -100 10 45.45
20 NS 4K N-1 -100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a.4 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman 58,14 %
21 NS 3C S = 140 16 72.73
22 NS 3T E+2 -150 4 18.18
23 NS 3C E-1 100 14 63.64
24 NS 2C W+2 -170 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 42,05 %
a.3 Edith Close -Jan Sassen 48,67 %
25 NS 2P S+1 140 8 36.36
26 NS 1P E+3 -170 4 18.18
27 NS 2P N = 110 17 77.27
28 NS 3P W-2 100 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
Total : 220,0 / 528 = 41,67 %
PAIRE a.4 Dominique Sassen -Gerard Cooreman
A.6 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander 53,41 %
1 EO 2C W = -110 11 50.00
2 EO 1P E+2 -140 20 90.91
3 EO 3S N-2 -100 21 95.45
4 EO 4C W = -620 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
A.7 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 57,39 %
9 EO 6P N+1 1010 9 40.91
10 EO 2S W-1 100 3 13.64
11 EO 3S N-2 -100 20 90.91
12 EO 4P N+1 650 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 56,63 %
13 EO 1S W-2 200 0 0.00
14 EO 3S E-1 50 21 95.45
15 EO 1S S+1 120 4 18.18
16 EO 2C N+1 140 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A.1 Fifi Englund -Sophie Tilemans 48,11 %
17 EO 1S E-1 50 14 63.64
18 EO 3S E = -400 22 100.00
19 EO 4TcS-1 -100 12 54.55
20 EO 2T E+1 -110 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A.5 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 41,67 %
21 EO 3C S = 140 6 27.27
22 EO 3T E+2 -150 18 81.82
23 EO 3C E-1 100 8 36.36
24 EO 2C W+2 -170 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 57,95 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 42,23 %
25 EO 1S S-2 -100 22 100.00
26 EO 2S E+1 -150 15 68.18
27 EO 1S W-1 50 14 63.64
28 EO 3K N = 110 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 60,23 %
Total : 307,0 / 528 = 58,14 %
PAIRE b.1 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys
B.1 Gaetan van de Werve -Thomas Brusselmans 45,45 %
1 EO 2C W = -110 11 50.00
2 EO 4P E-1 50 11 50.00
3 EO 1S S+1 120 8 36.36
4 EO 4C W-2 200 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
B.5 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin 56,63 %
5 EO 3S S+1 630 11 50.00
6 EO 3P N = 140 16 72.73
7 EO 3T W+1 -130 20 90.91
8 EO 3S W+2 -460 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
B.2 Claire Derieuw -Brigitte Brusselmans 47,16 %
9 EO 6P N+1 1010 9 40.91
10 EO 2S W+1 -150 22 100.00
11 EO 2P N-1 -50 13 59.09
12 EO 6P N-1 -100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
B.6 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 56,06 %
13 EO 1S S = 90 9 40.91
14 EO 4P E-4 200 0 0.00
15 EO 1S N-1 -100 21 95.45
16 EO 2C N+1 140 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
B.3 Lydia Wildiers -Giuseppe Napoli 43,94 %
17 EO 2C N = 110 9 40.91
18 EO 2S E+1 -150 20 90.91
19 EO 3K E+3 -170 20 90.91
20 EO 3C E = -140 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 76,14 %
B.4 Mercedes Steed -Myriam de Timary 53,22 %
25 EO 1S S = 90 20 90.91
26 EO 4P E-1 100 2 9.09
27 EO 2P N = 110 5 22.73
28 EO 3P W = -140 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 53,41 %
Total : 303,0 / 528 = 57,39 %
PAIRE a.7 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 56,63 %
1 EO 2C W = -110 11 50.00
2 EO 4PcW-2 300 1 4.55
3 EO 3S S-1 -50 16 72.73
4 EO 3C W-1 100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A.1 Fifi Englund -Sophie Tilemans 48,11 %
5 EO 3S N+2 660 3 13.64
6 EO 4P N-1 -50 22 100.00
7 EO 4K E-2 200 4 18.18
8 EO 5T W = -400 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A.5 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 41,67 %
9 EO 5P N+2 510 20 90.91
10 EO 2S W-1 100 3 13.64
11 EO 2P N-1 -50 13 59.09
12 EO 4P N+1 650 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 42,23 %
13 EO 2T W+1 -110 18 81.82
14 EO 2P E-1 50 21 95.45
15 EO 1S N = 90 13 59.09
16 EO 2P E+3 -200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
A.3 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 43,56 %
21 EO 3C S-1 -100 18 81.82
22 EO 4K E+1 -150 18 81.82
23 EO 3C E+1 -170 21 95.45
24 EO 2P W-1 50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.7 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 57,39 %
25 EO 2P S+2 170 3 13.64
26 EO 2K S-2 -200 20 90.91
27 EO 2P N = 110 5 22.73
28 EO 3S N-1 -100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
Total : 301,0 / 528 = 57,01 %
PAIRE b.7 Pascale Ortegat -Jean de Villenfagne
B.4 Mercedes Steed -Myriam de Timary 53,22 %
1 EO 2C W = -110 11 50.00
2 EO 3S W-1 50 11 50.00
3 EO 3S N-2 -100 21 95.45
4 EO 4C W = -620 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 71,59 %
B.1 Gaetan van de Werve -Thomas Brusselmans 45,45 %
5 EO 3S S = 600 17 77.27
6 EO 2P N+1 140 16 72.73
7 EO 4P S-2 -200 22 100.00
8 EO 4PcS-2 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
B.5 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin 56,63 %
9 EO 6S S+1 1020 0 0.00
10 EO 2K E+1 -110 9 40.91
11 EO 4CcE-2 300 2 9.09
12 EO 4P N+1 650 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 21,59 %
B.2 Claire Derieuw -Brigitte Brusselmans 47,16 %
13 EO 2S S-1 -100 13 59.09
14 EO 3S E-3 150 5 22.73
15 EO 1S N-1 -100 21 95.45
16 EO 3C N-1 -50 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 60,23 %
B.3 Lydia Wildiers -Giuseppe Napoli 43,94 %
21 EO 3P W-1 50 13 59.09
22 EO 3T E+2 -150 18 81.82
23 EO 3C E = -140 18 81.82
24 EO 2C W = -110 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 73,86 %
B.7 Philippe van der Gracht -Alexandre Viot 54,55 %
25 EO 2P S+2 170 3 13.64
26 EO 2S E-1 100 2 9.09
27 EO 3K E+1 -130 20 90.91
28 EO 4PcW-1 100 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
Total : 289,0 / 528 = 54,73 %
PAIRE b.5 Francoise Duren -Fabienne Smit
B.3 Lydia Wildiers -Giuseppe Napoli 43,94 %
1 EO 2C W = -110 11 50.00
2 EO 2P E-1 50 11 50.00
3 EO 2P N+1 140 1 4.55
4 EO 4C W-1 100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
B.7 Philippe van der Gracht -Alexandre Viot 54,55 %
5 EO 5T N = 600 17 77.27
6 EO 3P N = 140 16 72.73
7 EO 3P S-1 -100 13 59.09
8 EO 3S W+2 -460 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
B.1 Gaetan van de Werve -Thomas Brusselmans 45,45 %
13 EO 1S S = 90 9 40.91
14 EO 4P E-2 100 14 63.64
15 EO 1S N = 90 13 59.09
16 EO 2P E = -110 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
B.5 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin 56,63 %
17 EO 1S E-1 50 14 63.64
18 EO 2S E = -120 18 81.82
19 EO 3T S = 110 1 4.55
20 EO 4P W-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
B.2 Claire Derieuw -Brigitte Brusselmans 47,16 %
21 EO 3C S+1 170 1 4.55
22 EO 5T W-1 100 5 22.73
23 EO 3P N-1 -100 14 63.64
24 EO 1S N = 90 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 30,68 %
B.6 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 56,06 %
25 EO 1S S+1 120 18 81.82
26 EO 2S E+1 -150 15 68.18
27 EO 4CcS-2 -300 22 100.00
28 EO 3P W-1 50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 80,68 %
Total : 275,0 / 528 = 52,08 %
PAIRE a.5 Danielle Wybauw -Helene Schyns
A.3 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 43,56 %
1 EO 2C W = -110 11 50.00
2 EO 3C S-3 -300 22 100.00
3 EO 3T N+1 130 5 22.73
4 EO 2C W-1 100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.7 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 57,39 %
5 EO 3S S+1 630 11 50.00
6 EO 3P N+1 170 11 50.00
7 EO 2P S+1 140 7 31.82
8 EO 3S W+2 -460 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.1 Fifi Englund -Sophie Tilemans 48,11 %
13 EO 1T W+2 -110 18 81.82
14 EO 2P E-2 100 14 63.64
15 EO 1P W = -80 18 81.82
16 EO 2P E = -110 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.5 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 41,67 %
17 EO 2C S = 110 9 40.91
18 EO 3T W-3 150 1 4.55
19 EO 4TcS-1 -100 12 54.55
20 EO 4K N-1 -100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 42,23 %
21 EO 2P W-1 50 13 59.09
22 EO 5T E = -600 22 100.00
23 EO 3C E-1 100 8 36.36
24 EO 2P W-1 50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A.6 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander 53,41 %
25 EO 1S S+2 150 8 36.36
26 EO 2P E = -110 8 36.36
27 EO 2P N = 110 5 22.73
28 EO 3P W-2 100 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
Total : 272,0 / 528 = 51,52 %
PAIRE a.2 Marianne Falla -Noelle Fosse
A.5 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 41,67 %
1 EO 3S W+1 -430 22 100.00
2 EO 2P E-1 50 11 50.00
3 EO 2S N-1 -50 16 72.73
4 EO 4C W = -620 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 78,41 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 42,23 %
5 EO 3K S = 110 20 90.91
6 EO 4P N = 420 6 27.27
7 EO 4K E-3 300 2 9.09
8 EO 3S E+3 -490 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 55,68 %
A.6 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander 53,41 %
9 EO 6P N+1 1010 9 40.91
10 EO 3S W-1 100 3 13.64
11 EO 3S N-1 -50 13 59.09
12 EO 4P N+1 650 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
A.3 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 43,56 %
13 EO 2T W+1 -110 18 81.82
14 EO 3S E-2 100 14 63.64
15 EO 1S S+1 120 4 18.18
16 EO 3C N = 140 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.7 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 57,39 %
17 EO 2C S+2 170 2 9.09
18 EO 2T W-2 100 5 22.73
19 EO 4PcE = -790 22 100.00
20 EO 2C E+1 -140 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 53,41 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 56,63 %
21 EO 3C S+1 170 1 4.55
22 EO 3S E-1 100 5 22.73
23 EO 2P N+1 140 3 13.64
24 EO 2C W+2 -170 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
Total : 268,0 / 528 = 50,76 %
PAIRE a.3 Edith Close -Jan Sassen
A.6 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander 53,41 %
5 EO 3S S+1 630 11 50.00
6 EO 4P N+1 450 1 4.55
7 EO 3P S-1 -100 13 59.09
8 EO 3S E+2 -460 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.3 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 43,56 %
9 EO 4P N+3 510 20 90.91
10 EO 2S W = -120 16 72.73
11 EO 2P N+1 140 4 18.18
12 EO 4P N+1 650 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.7 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 57,39 %
13 EO 1S S+1 120 4 18.18
14 EO 3S E-2 100 14 63.64
15 EO 1S S+1 120 4 18.18
16 EO 2C N+1 140 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 56,63 %
17 EO 2S S-1 -50 19 86.36
18 EO 2C N-1 -100 14 63.64
19 EO 3T S-1 -50 6 27.27
20 EO 3C E = -140 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A.1 Fifi Englund -Sophie Tilemans 48,11 %
21 EO 3C S-1 -100 18 81.82
22 EO 4T E = -130 14 63.64
23 EO 3C E-1 100 8 36.36
24 EO 1S N+1 120 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.5 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 41,67 %
25 EO 2P S+1 140 14 63.64
26 EO 1P E+3 -170 18 81.82
27 EO 2P N = 110 5 22.73
28 EO 3P W-2 100 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
Total : 257,0 / 528 = 48,67 %
PAIRE a.1 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger
A.1 Fifi Englund -Sophie Tilemans 48,11 %
1 EO 2C W = -110 11 50.00
2 EO 1S E+1 -120 18 81.82
3 EO 2P N+1 140 1 4.55
4 EO 4C W-1 100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.5 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 41,67 %
5 EO 3S N-1 -100 22 100.00
6 EO 2P N = 110 20 90.91
7 EO 3P S-1 -100 13 59.09
8 EO 3S E+2 -460 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 42,23 %
9 EO 6P N+1 1010 9 40.91
10 EO 2S W = -120 16 72.73
11 EO 3S N = 400 0 0.00
12 EO 4P N+1 650 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
A.6 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander 53,41 %
13 EO 2P S-2 -200 22 100.00
14 EO 4P E-3 150 5 22.73
15 EO 1S S+1 120 4 18.18
16 EO 3C S = 140 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 42,05 %
A.3 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 43,56 %
17 EO 2C S+3 200 0 0.00
18 EO 3T W-1 50 9 40.91
19 EO 4TcS-1 -100 12 54.55
20 EO 3C E = -140 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 44,32 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 56,63 %
25 EO 2P S+1 140 14 63.64
26 EO 2P E = -110 8 36.36
27 EO 3P N-1 -50 18 81.82
28 EO 3ScE-3 500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
Total : 255,0 / 528 = 48,30 %
PAIRE b.2 Olivier Paternostre -Diane Emsens
B.5 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin 56,63 %
1 EO 2S W+2 -180 20 90.91
2 EO 1P E+1 -110 16 72.73
3 EO 3T N+1 130 5 22.73
4 EO 4C W-1 100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 57,95 %
B.2 Claire Derieuw -Brigitte Brusselmans 47,16 %
5 EO 3S S+1 630 11 50.00
6 EO 4P N = 420 6 27.27
7 EO 1S E+1 -120 18 81.82
8 EO 3S E+2 -460 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
B.6 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 56,06 %
9 EO 6P N+1 1010 9 40.91
10 EO 1S W+1 -120 16 72.73
11 EO 2P N = 110 7 31.82
12 EO 4P N+1 650 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
B.3 Lydia Wildiers -Giuseppe Napoli 43,94 %
13 EO 1S S+1 120 4 18.18
14 EO 4P E-3 150 5 22.73
15 EO 1S S = 90 13 59.09
16 EO 3C N = 140 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
B.7 Philippe van der Gracht -Alexandre Viot 54,55 %
17 EO 2C N-1 -50 19 86.36
18 EO 3S E-1 50 9 40.91
19 EO 4T S-1 -50 6 27.27
20 EO 3K S = 110 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 44,32 %
B.4 Mercedes Steed -Myriam de Timary 53,22 %
21 EO 4C S-2 -200 22 100.00
22 EO 2P S+1 140 0 0.00
23 EO 3P N = 140 3 13.64
24 EO 2CcW+2 -670 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 53,41 %
Total : 251,0 / 528 = 47,54 %
PAIRE b.6 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger
B.7 Philippe van der Gracht -Alexandre Viot 54,55 %
1 EO 3P N-1 -50 2 9.09
2 EO 4P E-2 100 6 27.27
3 EO 3S N-1 -50 16 72.73
4 EO 4C W-2 200 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 28,41 %
B.4 Mercedes Steed -Myriam de Timary 53,22 %
5 EO 3S S+2 660 3 13.64
6 EO 4P N = 420 6 27.27
7 EO 3P S-1 -100 13 59.09
8 EO 3S E+2 -460 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
B.1 Gaetan van de Werve -Thomas Brusselmans 45,45 %
9 EO 6P N+1 1010 9 40.91
10 EO 2S W = -120 16 72.73
11 EO 3S N-2 -100 20 90.91
12 EO 6P N-1 -100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 73,86 %
B.2 Claire Derieuw -Brigitte Brusselmans 47,16 %
17 EO 1S E-1 50 14 63.64
18 EO 3C N-1 -100 14 63.64
19 EO 3K E+2 -150 17 77.27
20 EO 3K N = 110 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
B.6 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 56,06 %
21 EO 3C S = 140 6 27.27
22 EO 3P S-1 -50 9 40.91
23 EO 3C E-3 300 0 0.00
24 EO 1S N-1 -50 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 32,95 %
B.3 Lydia Wildiers -Giuseppe Napoli 43,94 %
25 EO 2C N+1 140 14 63.64
26 EO 2S E-1 100 2 9.09
27 EO 3K E-1 50 14 63.64
28 EO 3P W-2 100 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 44,32 %
Total : 241,0 / 528 = 45,64 %
PAIRE b.4 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm
B.6 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 56,06 %
1 EO 2C W = -110 11 50.00
2 EO 4PcE-2 300 1 4.55
3 EO 1S S = 90 12 54.55
4 EO 4C W-1 100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
B.7 Philippe van der Gracht -Alexandre Viot 54,55 %
9 EO 6P N+1 1010 9 40.91
10 EO 2S W-1 100 3 13.64
11 EO 3S N-1 -50 13 59.09
12 EO 6S S-1 -100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 51,14 %
B.4 Mercedes Steed -Myriam de Timary 53,22 %
13 EO 2S S-1 -100 13 59.09
14 EO 4P E-3 150 5 22.73
15 EO 1S S = 90 13 59.09
16 EO 2C S+1 140 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 42,05 %
B.1 Gaetan van de Werve -Thomas Brusselmans 45,45 %
17 EO 1S S+1 120 6 27.27
18 EO 2C N-1 -100 14 63.64
19 EO 4K E+1 -150 17 77.27
20 EO 3K S = 110 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
B.5 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin 56,63 %
21 EO 4C S-1 -100 18 81.82
22 EO 2P S = 110 2 9.09
23 EO 3K W = -110 16 72.73
24 EO 1S N+1 120 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
B.2 Claire Derieuw -Brigitte Brusselmans 47,16 %
25 EO 1S S+3 180 0 0.00
26 EO 1P E+2 -140 12 54.55
27 EO 2P N = 110 5 22.73
28 EO 3K N-2 -200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 44,32 %
Total : 235,0 / 528 = 44,51 %
PAIRE a.6 Prisca Tondreau -Chantal de Lichtervelde
A.7 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 57,39 %
1 EO 2C W-1 50 0 0.00
2 EO 2C S = 110 4 18.18
3 EO 2P N = 110 10 45.45
4 EO 4C W-1 100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 56,63 %
5 EO 3S S+2 660 3 13.64
6 EO 2P N+2 170 11 50.00
7 EO 4KcE-4 1100 0 0.00
8 EO 3S W+3 -490 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 39,77 %
A.1 Fifi Englund -Sophie Tilemans 48,11 %
9 EO 6P N+1 1010 9 40.91
10 EO 2P W = -110 9 40.91
11 EO 2P N = 110 7 31.82
12 EO 4P N+1 650 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 42,23 %
17 EO 3C N-2 -100 22 100.00
18 EO 3T W-3 150 1 4.55
19 EO 3T S = 110 1 4.55
20 EO 2C E+1 -140 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.6 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander 53,41 %
21 EO 3P W-2 100 10 45.45
22 EO 2P S-1 -50 9 40.91
23 EO 2K W = -90 12 54.55
24 EO 1S N = 90 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A.3 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 43,56 %
25 EO 1S S+2 150 8 36.36
26 EO 1S S-3 -300 22 100.00
27 EO 3K E-1 50 14 63.64
28 EO 4P W-2 100 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 60,23 %
Total : 225,0 / 528 = 42,61 %
PAIRE b.3 Paul Gatel -Philippe Steyt
B.6 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 56,06 %
5 EO 3S N+2 660 3 13.64
6 EO 4P N+1 450 1 4.55
7 EO 3P S = 140 7 31.82
8 EO 3S W+2 -460 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
B.3 Lydia Wildiers -Giuseppe Napoli 43,94 %
9 EO 5P N+2 510 20 90.91
10 EO 2S E = -120 16 72.73
11 EO 3S N-2 -100 20 90.91
12 EO 4P N+1 650 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
B.7 Philippe van der Gracht -Alexandre Viot 54,55 %
13 EO 1S S+1 120 4 18.18
14 EO 3P E-2 100 14 63.64
15 EO 1S N+1 120 4 18.18
16 EO 2P E = -110 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
B.4 Mercedes Steed -Myriam de Timary 53,22 %
17 EO 2C N+1 140 4 18.18
18 EO 2S E-2 100 5 22.73
19 EO 4T S-1 -50 6 27.27
20 EO 3K N = 110 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
B.1 Gaetan van de Werve -Thomas Brusselmans 45,45 %
21 EO 3C S = 140 6 27.27
22 EO 4P S-2 -100 12 54.55
23 EO 3C E+1 -170 21 95.45
24 EO 2S N = 120 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 46,59 %
B.5 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin 56,63 %
25 EO 1S S+2 150 8 36.36
26 EO 3T E = -110 8 36.36
27 EO 2P N = 110 5 22.73
28 EO 4T E-2 100 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
Total : 217,0 / 528 = 41,10 %
|