B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 61,02 A13 Claire Derieuw -Diane Deslignes
--- 2 56,57 A10 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens
--- 3 55,34 A.7 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier
--- 4 55,32 A.1 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza
--- 5 50,91 A.5 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne
--- 6 50,59 A.4 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander
--- 7 49,13 A.3 Patricia Bardy -Therese Roland
--- 8 49,02 A11 Thomas Brusselmans -Christian Martinot
--- 9 48,81 A.6 Jeanine Bontemps -Pierina Divito
--- 10 45,98 A12 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans
--- 11 45,53 A.8 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier
--- 12 42,41 A.9 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn
--- 13 39,36 A.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 61,84 a.5 Teresa Dekoster -Philippe van der Gracht
--- 2 60,78 a.8 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor
--- 3 58,96 a11 Christiane Huby -Dominique Sassen
--- 4 58,56 a.9 Max Poupinel -Christian Neve
--- 5 57,14 a.2 Thierry Bollansee -Denis Guibert
--- 6 57,01 a.1 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens
--- 7 49,94 a.4 Benedicte Albani -Nathalie de Laminne
--- 8 45,78 a.7 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
--- 9 44,03 a13 Simone Munsterhjelm -Sylviane Delbeke
--- 10 41,55 a.6 Philippe d'Hoop -Juan del Marmol
--- 11 40,11 a12 Benedicte Lemaigre -Brigitte Velge
--- 12 38,86 a10 Miguel Paredes -Manolo Hernandez
--- 13 35,45 a.3 Jan Sassen -Edith Close
PAIRE A13 Claire Derieuw -Diane Deslignes
a12 Benedicte Lemaigre -Brigitte Velge 40,11 %
1 NS 4P N+1 450 18 81.82
2 NS 1S S+1 120 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 75,91 %
a11 Christiane Huby -Dominique Sassen 58,96 %
3 NS 2P N = 110 14 63.64
4 NS 3S N-1 -100 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a10 Miguel Paredes -Manolo Hernandez 38,86 %
5 NS 4P N-1 -100 8 36.36
6 NS 5P S = 450 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.9 Max Poupinel -Christian Neve 58,56 %
7 NS 6S W-1 100 18 81.82
8 NS 6S N = 990 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a.8 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 60,78 %
9 NS 5PcN-4 -800 6 27.27
10 NS 3S S-1 -100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 33,64 %
a.7 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 45,78 %
11 NS 1S W+2 -150 14 63.64
12 NS 2P N = 110 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.6 Philippe d'Hoop -Juan del Marmol 41,55 %
13 NS 3K E-3 300 22 100.00
14 NS 3S E-1 50 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 100,00 %
a.5 Teresa Dekoster -Philippe van der Gracht 61,84 %
15 NS 4C W+2 -480 0 0.00
16 NS 3S N-3 -150 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
a.4 Benedicte Albani -Nathalie de Laminne 49,94 %
17 NS 5K W-1 50 15 68.18
18 NS 3S S+2 660 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
a.3 Jan Sassen -Edith Close 35,45 %
19 NS 2C N+2 170 19 86.36
20 NS 4K E+2 -170 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
a.2 Thierry Bollansee -Denis Guibert 57,14 %
21 NS 3S N-1 -100 8 36.36
22 NS 3S W = -600 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a13 Simone Munsterhjelm -Sylviane Delbeke 44,03 %
25 NS 3K E = -110 14 63.64
26 NS 4C N = 620 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
Total : 322,2 / 528 = 61,02 %
PAIRE A10 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens
a.6 Philippe d'Hoop -Juan del Marmol 41,55 %
1 NS 3P N+2 200 4 18.18
2 NS 1S S+2 150 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 56,36 %
a.5 Teresa Dekoster -Philippe van der Gracht 61,84 %
3 NS 2P N = 110 14 63.64
4 NS 2K S = 90 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.4 Benedicte Albani -Nathalie de Laminne 49,94 %
5 NS 4C W-1 50 15 68.18
6 NS 4P S+1 450 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a.3 Jan Sassen -Edith Close 35,45 %
7 NS 6S W-1 100 18 81.82
8 NS 3S N+3 490 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.2 Thierry Bollansee -Denis Guibert 57,14 %
9 NS 6C E = -1430 2 9.09
10 NS 4C E-2 200 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 54,32 %
a.1 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens 57,01 %
11 NS 3S W-1 50 21 95.45
12 NS 3P N-3 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a13 Simone Munsterhjelm -Sylviane Delbeke 44,03 %
13 NS 2P S = 110 13 59.09
14 NS 4C E+1 -450 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a12 Benedicte Lemaigre -Brigitte Velge 40,11 %
15 NS 4C W+1 -450 8 36.36
16 NS 2C N = 110 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a10 Miguel Paredes -Manolo Hernandez 38,86 %
19 NS 3C N+1 170 19 86.36
20 NS 4K E+1 -150 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
a.9 Max Poupinel -Christian Neve 58,56 %
21 NS 3S N+2 660 16 72.73
22 NS 3S W-2 200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
a.8 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 60,78 %
23 NS 3C N-1 -100 8 36.36
24 NS 2C N+2 170 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.7 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 45,78 %
25 NS 5K E-1 100 20 90.91
26 NS 3S S-2 -200 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
Total : 298,7 / 528 = 56,57 %
PAIRE A.7 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier
a13 Simone Munsterhjelm -Sylviane Delbeke 44,03 %
1 NS 4P N+1 450 18 81.82
2 NS 1S S+1 120 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 75,91 %
a12 Benedicte Lemaigre -Brigitte Velge 40,11 %
3 NS 1S E = -90 8 36.36
4 NS 3S N = 600 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a11 Christiane Huby -Dominique Sassen 58,96 %
5 NS 3C W = -140 5 22.73
6 NS 6P S-1 -50 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a10 Miguel Paredes -Manolo Hernandez 38,86 %
7 NS 6S W = -1440 6 27.27
8 NS 6S N = 990 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.9 Max Poupinel -Christian Neve 58,56 %
9 NS 6K E-1 100 21 95.45
10 NS 5T S-1 -100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 67,73 %
a.7 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 45,78 %
13 NS 2P S = 110 13 59.09
14 NS 4C E+1 -450 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.6 Philippe d'Hoop -Juan del Marmol 41,55 %
15 NS 4P W = -420 19 86.36
16 NS 3K N-2 -100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a.5 Teresa Dekoster -Philippe van der Gracht 61,84 %
17 NS 6K W-2 100 20 90.91
18 NS 3T S+2 150 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
a.4 Benedicte Albani -Nathalie de Laminne 49,94 %
19 NS 2C S+1 140 9 40.91
20 NS 5K E = -600 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.3 Jan Sassen -Edith Close 35,45 %
21 NS 3S N+3 690 22 100.00
22 NS 3S W = -600 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
a.2 Thierry Bollansee -Denis Guibert 57,14 %
23 NS 3C N-1 -100 8 36.36
24 NS 2P N+3 200 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.1 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens 57,01 %
25 NS 3K E+1 -130 5 22.73
26 NS 3S S = 600 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
Total : 292,2 / 528 = 55,34 %
PAIRE A.1 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza
a.1 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens 57,01 %
1 NS 4P N+1 450 18 81.82
2 NS 1S S-1 -100 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 46,14 %
a13 Simone Munsterhjelm -Sylviane Delbeke 44,03 %
3 NS 1S S-2 -100 6 27.27
4 NS 1S N+1 120 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a12 Benedicte Lemaigre -Brigitte Velge 40,11 %
5 NS 4C W-1 50 15 68.18
6 NS 4P S+2 480 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
a11 Christiane Huby -Dominique Sassen 58,96 %
7 NS 6S W-1 100 18 81.82
8 NS 6S N = 990 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a10 Miguel Paredes -Manolo Hernandez 38,86 %
9 NS 4PcN-3 -500 17 77.27
10 NS 4T N-1 -100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 58,64 %
a.9 Max Poupinel -Christian Neve 58,56 %
11 NS 3S W+2 -460 1 4.55
12 NS 3P N-1 -100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
a.8 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 60,78 %
13 NS 2P S+1 140 19 86.36
14 NS 4C E = -420 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a.7 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 45,78 %
15 NS 3S E+1 -430 15 68.18
16 NS 2S N = 120 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
a.6 Philippe d'Hoop -Juan del Marmol 41,55 %
17 NS 5K W = -400 3 13.64
18 NS 3S S+1 630 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.5 Teresa Dekoster -Philippe van der Gracht 61,84 %
19 NS 4C N-1 -50 1 4.55
20 NS 5K E = -600 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.4 Benedicte Albani -Nathalie de Laminne 49,94 %
21 NS 3S N-1 -100 8 36.36
22 NS 3S W = -600 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.3 Jan Sassen -Edith Close 35,45 %
23 NS 2C N = 110 18 81.82
24 NS 2P S+3 200 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
Total : 292,1 / 528 = 55,32 %
PAIRE A.5 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne
a.9 Max Poupinel -Christian Neve 58,56 %
1 NS 3P N+2 200 4 18.18
2 NS 2C E-2 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a.8 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 60,78 %
3 NS 1S S+1 120 19 86.36
4 NS 1S N = 90 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a.7 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 45,78 %
5 NS 4C W-1 50 15 68.18
6 NS 6P S-1 -50 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.5 Teresa Dekoster -Philippe van der Gracht 61,84 %
9 NS 4PcN-3 -500 17 77.27
10 NS 4K N-1 -100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 58,64 %
a.4 Benedicte Albani -Nathalie de Laminne 49,94 %
11 NS 3S W+1 -430 6 27.27
12 NS 2P N = 110 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.3 Jan Sassen -Edith Close 35,45 %
13 NS 2P S = 110 13 59.09
14 NS 3S E = -400 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a.2 Thierry Bollansee -Denis Guibert 57,14 %
15 NS 4C W+1 -450 8 36.36
16 NS 3S S-3 -150 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.1 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens 57,01 %
17 NS 4K W = -130 8 36.36
18 NS 4P S-1 -100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a13 Simone Munsterhjelm -Sylviane Delbeke 44,03 %
19 NS 2C S+1 140 9 40.91
20 NS 4K E+1 -150 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a12 Benedicte Lemaigre -Brigitte Velge 40,11 %
21 NS 3S N+2 660 16 72.73
22 NS 3S W = -600 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a11 Christiane Huby -Dominique Sassen 58,96 %
23 NS 3C N-1 -100 8 36.36
24 NS 2P N+3 200 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a10 Miguel Paredes -Manolo Hernandez 38,86 %
25 NS 3K E = -110 14 63.64
26 NS 3S S = 600 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
Total : 268,8 / 528 = 50,91 %
PAIRE A.4 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander
a.7 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 45,78 %
1 NS 4P N+1 450 18 81.82
2 NS 1S S-1 -100 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 46,14 %
a.6 Philippe d'Hoop -Juan del Marmol 41,55 %
3 NS 2P N = 110 14 63.64
4 NS 2P E-3 300 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.4 Benedicte Albani -Nathalie de Laminne 49,94 %
7 NS 6S W = -1440 6 27.27
8 NS 6S S = 990 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.3 Jan Sassen -Edith Close 35,45 %
9 NS 5C W+1 -680 10 45.45
10 NS 3S S-1 -100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
a.2 Thierry Bollansee -Denis Guibert 57,14 %
11 NS 2S W+2 -180 11 50.00
12 NS 3K W-1 50 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.1 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens 57,01 %
13 NS 3P S-1 -100 4 18.18
14 NS 3S E = -400 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a13 Simone Munsterhjelm -Sylviane Delbeke 44,03 %
15 NS 4C W = -420 19 86.36
16 NS 2C N = 110 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
a12 Benedicte Lemaigre -Brigitte Velge 40,11 %
17 NS 4K W = -130 8 36.36
18 NS 4P S-1 -100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a11 Christiane Huby -Dominique Sassen 58,96 %
19 NS 2C N+2 170 19 86.36
20 NS 5K E = -600 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a10 Miguel Paredes -Manolo Hernandez 38,86 %
21 NS 3S N+2 660 16 72.73
22 NS 3S W = -600 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a.9 Max Poupinel -Christian Neve 58,56 %
23 NS 3P E-1 100 14 63.64
24 NS 3P N = 140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a.8 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 60,78 %
25 NS 3S W = -600 0 0.00
26 NS 5K S+1 620 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
Total : 267,1 / 528 = 50,59 %
PAIRE A.3 Patricia Bardy -Therese Roland
a.5 Teresa Dekoster -Philippe van der Gracht 61,84 %
1 NS 3P N+2 200 4 18.18
2 NS 1S S = 90 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 26,59 %
a.3 Jan Sassen -Edith Close 35,45 %
5 NS 4C W-1 50 15 68.18
6 NS 6P S-1 -50 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.2 Thierry Bollansee -Denis Guibert 57,14 %
7 NS 6S W = -1440 6 27.27
8 NS 6S N = 990 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.1 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens 57,01 %
9 NS 4C W+2 -680 10 45.45
10 NS 2S S = 120 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 67,50 %
a13 Simone Munsterhjelm -Sylviane Delbeke 44,03 %
11 NS 2S W = -120 16 72.73
12 NS 2P N = 110 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a12 Benedicte Lemaigre -Brigitte Velge 40,11 %
13 NS 2P S-1 -100 4 18.18
14 NS 4C E+1 -450 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
a11 Christiane Huby -Dominique Sassen 58,96 %
15 NS 4C W+1 -450 8 36.36
16 NS 2S N-3 -150 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a10 Miguel Paredes -Manolo Hernandez 38,86 %
17 NS 4K W = -130 8 36.36
18 NS 3T S+2 150 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.9 Max Poupinel -Christian Neve 58,56 %
19 NS 4C N-1 -50 1 4.55
20 NS 5PcN-2 -500 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a.8 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 60,78 %
21 NS 3S N+2 660 16 72.73
22 NS 3S W+1 -630 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.7 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 45,78 %
23 NS 3S W-2 200 22 100.00
24 NS 4P S+1 450 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 97,73 %
a.6 Philippe d'Hoop -Juan del Marmol 41,55 %
25 NS 3K E = -110 14 63.64
26 NS 3S S = 600 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
Total : 259,4 / 528 = 49,13 %
PAIRE A11 Thomas Brusselmans -Christian Martinot
a.8 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 60,78 %
1 NS 4P N-1 -50 0 0.00
2 NS 3S S-1 -100 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 5,23 %
a.7 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 45,78 %
3 NS 1S N-1 -50 10 45.45
4 NS 2P E-2 200 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a.6 Philippe d'Hoop -Juan del Marmol 41,55 %
5 NS 4P N = 620 22 100.00
6 NS 4P S+1 450 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
a.5 Teresa Dekoster -Philippe van der Gracht 61,84 %
7 NS 6S E = -1440 6 27.27
8 NS 6S N = 990 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.4 Benedicte Albani -Nathalie de Laminne 49,94 %
9 NS 5C W+1 -680 10 45.45
10 NS 3C E-1 100 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
a.3 Jan Sassen -Edith Close 35,45 %
11 NS 1S W+3 -180 11 50.00
12 NS 2P N = 110 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.2 Thierry Bollansee -Denis Guibert 57,14 %
13 NS 1S S = 90 8 36.36
14 NS 4C E+1 -450 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a.1 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens 57,01 %
15 NS 4C W+1 -450 8 36.36
16 NS 2C N-1 -50 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a13 Simone Munsterhjelm -Sylviane Delbeke 44,03 %
17 NS 5K W-1 50 15 68.18
18 NS 2P S+1 140 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a11 Christiane Huby -Dominique Sassen 58,96 %
21 NS 3S N-2 -200 2 9.09
22 NS 3S W+1 -630 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
a10 Miguel Paredes -Manolo Hernandez 38,86 %
23 NS 3C N-1 -100 8 36.36
24 NS 2P S+3 200 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.9 Max Poupinel -Christian Neve 58,56 %
25 NS 3K E = -110 14 63.64
26 NS 4C N+1 650 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
Total : 258,8 / 528 = 49,02 %
PAIRE A.6 Jeanine Bontemps -Pierina Divito
a11 Christiane Huby -Dominique Sassen 58,96 %
1 NS 4P N = 420 10 45.45
2 NS 1S S = 90 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
a10 Miguel Paredes -Manolo Hernandez 38,86 %
3 NS 1S S+2 150 22 100.00
4 NS 2K S = 90 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a.9 Max Poupinel -Christian Neve 58,56 %
5 NS 4C W = -420 1 4.55
6 NS 6P S-1 -50 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
a.8 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 60,78 %
7 NS 6S W = -1440 6 27.27
8 NS 6S N = 990 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.6 Philippe d'Hoop -Juan del Marmol 41,55 %
11 NS 3S W+1 -430 6 27.27
12 NS 3P N-1 -100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a.5 Teresa Dekoster -Philippe van der Gracht 61,84 %
13 NS 2P S-1 -100 4 18.18
14 NS 4C E+1 -450 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
a.4 Benedicte Albani -Nathalie de Laminne 49,94 %
15 NS 4C W+1 -450 8 36.36
16 NS 4C N-3 -150 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.3 Jan Sassen -Edith Close 35,45 %
17 NS 6KcE-2 300 22 100.00
18 NS 2P S+1 140 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a.2 Thierry Bollansee -Denis Guibert 57,14 %
19 NS 2C S+1 140 9 40.91
20 NS 5K E = -600 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.1 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens 57,01 %
21 NS 3S N-1 -100 8 36.36
22 NS 1S W+1 -120 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a13 Simone Munsterhjelm -Sylviane Delbeke 44,03 %
23 NS 2C N = 110 18 81.82
24 NS 2P S+3 200 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a12 Benedicte Lemaigre -Brigitte Velge 40,11 %
25 NS 5K W-2 200 22 100.00
26 NS 3S S+3 690 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 95,45 %
Total : 257,7 / 528 = 48,81 %
PAIRE A12 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans
a10 Miguel Paredes -Manolo Hernandez 38,86 %
1 NS 4P S+1 450 18 81.82
2 NS 50%50% Ajust 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a.9 Max Poupinel -Christian Neve 58,56 %
3 NS 1S E+1 -120 2 9.09
4 NS 1S N+1 120 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a.8 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 60,78 %
5 NS 2C W+1 -140 5 22.73
6 NS 6P S-1 -50 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.7 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 45,78 %
7 NS 6S W = -1440 6 27.27
8 NS 6S N = 990 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.6 Philippe d'Hoop -Juan del Marmol 41,55 %
9 NS 4C W+1 -650 14 63.64
10 NS 5T S-1 -100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 51,82 %
a.5 Teresa Dekoster -Philippe van der Gracht 61,84 %
11 NS 3S W+2 -460 1 4.55
12 NS 2P N = 110 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a.4 Benedicte Albani -Nathalie de Laminne 49,94 %
13 NS 2P S = 110 13 59.09
14 NS 4C E+1 -450 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.3 Jan Sassen -Edith Close 35,45 %
15 NS 4C E-2 100 22 100.00
16 NS 2C N+1 140 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 100,00 %
a.2 Thierry Bollansee -Denis Guibert 57,14 %
17 NS 4P E-1 50 15 68.18
18 NS 3P S-1 -100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.1 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens 57,01 %
19 NS 3C N = 140 9 40.91
20 NS 5K E = -600 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a12 Benedicte Lemaigre -Brigitte Velge 40,11 %
23 NS 2C N = 110 18 81.82
24 NS 1S N+2 150 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a11 Christiane Huby -Dominique Sassen 58,96 %
25 NS 3K E+1 -130 5 22.73
26 NS 2PcE-2 500 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
Total : 242,8 / 528 = 45,98 %
PAIRE A.8 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier
a.2 Thierry Bollansee -Denis Guibert 57,14 %
1 NS 4P N = 420 10 45.45
2 NS 1S S+1 120 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 57,73 %
a.1 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens 57,01 %
3 NS 2S E = -120 2 9.09
4 NS 3S S-1 -100 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
a13 Simone Munsterhjelm -Sylviane Delbeke 44,03 %
5 NS 4C W-1 50 15 68.18
6 NS 6P S-1 -50 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a12 Benedicte Lemaigre -Brigitte Velge 40,11 %
7 NS 6S W-1 100 18 81.82
8 NS 6S N = 990 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a11 Christiane Huby -Dominique Sassen 58,96 %
9 NS 6C W-1 100 21 95.45
10 NS 50%50% Ajust 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a10 Miguel Paredes -Manolo Hernandez 38,86 %
11 NS 3T W = -110 18 81.82
12 NS 3K E+1 -130 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.8 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 60,78 %
15 NS 3S E+1 -430 15 68.18
16 NS 2C N-1 -50 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a.7 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 45,78 %
17 NS 5K W-1 50 15 68.18
18 NS 4P S-1 -100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.6 Philippe d'Hoop -Juan del Marmol 41,55 %
19 NS 2C N+1 140 9 40.91
20 NS 5K E+1 -620 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.5 Teresa Dekoster -Philippe van der Gracht 61,84 %
21 NS 3S N-2 -200 2 9.09
22 NS 3S W+1 -630 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
a.4 Benedicte Albani -Nathalie de Laminne 49,94 %
23 NS 4C N-2 -200 1 4.55
24 NS 4P S+1 450 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.3 Jan Sassen -Edith Close 35,45 %
25 NS 3K E = -110 14 63.64
26 NS 3S S = 600 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
Total : 240,4 / 528 = 45,53 %
PAIRE A.9 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn
a.4 Benedicte Albani -Nathalie de Laminne 49,94 %
1 NS 4P N = 420 10 45.45
2 NS 1S S+2 150 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
a.3 Jan Sassen -Edith Close 35,45 %
3 NS 1S S+1 120 19 86.36
4 NS 3S N-1 -100 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.2 Thierry Bollansee -Denis Guibert 57,14 %
5 NS 4C W-1 50 15 68.18
6 NS 4P S+1 450 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a.1 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens 57,01 %
7 NS 6S W = -1440 6 27.27
8 NS 6S N = 990 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a13 Simone Munsterhjelm -Sylviane Delbeke 44,03 %
9 NS 6C E = -1430 2 9.09
10 NS 4C E = -620 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 4,77 %
a12 Benedicte Lemaigre -Brigitte Velge 40,11 %
11 NS 3S W-1 50 21 95.45
12 NS 2P N = 110 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
a11 Christiane Huby -Dominique Sassen 58,96 %
13 NS 3C E = -140 0 0.00
14 NS 4C E = -420 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a.9 Max Poupinel -Christian Neve 58,56 %
17 NS 5K E = -400 3 13.64
18 NS 3P N-1 -100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
a.8 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 60,78 %
19 NS 2C N+1 140 9 40.91
20 NS 5K E+1 -620 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.7 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 45,78 %
21 NS 3S N-2 -200 2 9.09
22 NS 3S E+1 -630 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
a.6 Philippe d'Hoop -Juan del Marmol 41,55 %
23 NS 3C N-1 -100 8 36.36
24 NS 2P N+3 200 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.5 Teresa Dekoster -Philippe van der Gracht 61,84 %
25 NS 3K E+1 -130 5 22.73
26 NS 3S S+4 720 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
Total : 223,9 / 528 = 42,41 %
PAIRE A.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle
a.2 Thierry Bollansee -Denis Guibert 57,14 %
3 NS 1S E+1 -120 2 9.09
4 NS 3S N-1 -100 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
a.1 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens 57,01 %
5 NS 4C W = -420 1 4.55
6 NS 4P S+1 450 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a13 Simone Munsterhjelm -Sylviane Delbeke 44,03 %
7 NS 6S W-1 100 18 81.82
8 NS 7S N-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a12 Benedicte Lemaigre -Brigitte Velge 40,11 %
9 NS 6C W = -1430 2 9.09
10 NS 4K N-1 -100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 24,55 %
a11 Christiane Huby -Dominique Sassen 58,96 %
11 NS 3S W+1 -430 6 27.27
12 NS 2P N = 110 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a10 Miguel Paredes -Manolo Hernandez 38,86 %
13 NS 2P S+1 140 19 86.36
14 NS 3S E = -400 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
a.9 Max Poupinel -Christian Neve 58,56 %
15 NS 3S E+2 -460 2 9.09
16 NS 3S S-3 -150 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
a.8 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 60,78 %
17 NS 4P E+1 -450 0 0.00
18 NS 3T S+2 150 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.7 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 45,78 %
19 NS 3C N+1 170 19 86.36
20 NS 5K W = -600 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a.6 Philippe d'Hoop -Juan del Marmol 41,55 %
21 NS 3S N+2 660 16 72.73
22 NS 3S W = -600 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a.5 Teresa Dekoster -Philippe van der Gracht 61,84 %
23 NS 4P N-2 -200 1 4.55
24 NS 2C N+3 200 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a.4 Benedicte Albani -Nathalie de Laminne 49,94 %
25 NS 3K E+1 -130 5 22.73
26 NS 3S S-2 -200 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
Total : 207,8 / 528 = 39,36 %
PAIRE a.5 Teresa Dekoster -Philippe van der Gracht
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Therese Roland 49,13 %
1 EO 3P N+2 200 18 81.82
2 EO 1S S = 90 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 73,41 %
A10 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 56,57 %
3 EO 2P N = 110 8 36.36
4 EO 2K S = 90 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A11 Thomas Brusselmans -Christian Martinot 49,02 %
7 EO 6S E = -1440 16 72.73
8 EO 6S N = 990 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.5 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne 50,91 %
9 EO 4PcN-3 -500 5 22.73
10 EO 4K N-1 -100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 41,36 %
A12 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 45,98 %
11 EO 3S W+2 -460 21 95.45
12 EO 2P N = 110 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A.6 Jeanine Bontemps -Pierina Divito 48,81 %
13 EO 2P S-1 -100 18 81.82
14 EO 4C E+1 -450 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
A13 Claire Derieuw -Diane Deslignes 61,02 %
15 EO 4C W+2 -480 22 100.00
16 EO 3S N-3 -150 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
A.7 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 55,34 %
17 EO 6K W-2 100 2 9.09
18 EO 3T S+2 150 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 55,32 %
19 EO 4C N-1 -50 21 95.45
20 EO 5K E = -600 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.8 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier 45,53 %
21 EO 3S N-2 -200 20 90.91
22 EO 3S W+1 -630 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
A.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 39,36 %
23 EO 4P N-2 -200 21 95.45
24 EO 2C N+3 200 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A.9 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn 42,41 %
25 EO 3K E+1 -130 17 77.27
26 EO 3S S+4 720 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
Total : 326,5 / 528 = 61,84 %
PAIRE a.8 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor
A11 Thomas Brusselmans -Christian Martinot 49,02 %
1 EO 4P N-1 -50 22 100.00
2 EO 3S S-1 -100 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 94,77 %
A.5 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne 50,91 %
3 EO 1S S+1 120 3 13.64
4 EO 1S N = 90 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A12 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 45,98 %
5 EO 2C W+1 -140 17 77.27
6 EO 6P S-1 -50 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.6 Jeanine Bontemps -Pierina Divito 48,81 %
7 EO 6S W = -1440 16 72.73
8 EO 6S N = 990 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A13 Claire Derieuw -Diane Deslignes 61,02 %
9 EO 5PcN-4 -800 16 72.73
10 EO 3S S-1 -100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 66,36 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 55,32 %
13 EO 2P S+1 140 3 13.64
14 EO 4C E = -420 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A.8 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier 45,53 %
15 EO 3S E+1 -430 7 31.82
16 EO 2C N-1 -50 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 39,36 %
17 EO 4P E+1 -450 22 100.00
18 EO 3T S+2 150 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.9 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn 42,41 %
19 EO 2C N+1 140 13 59.09
20 EO 5K E+1 -620 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Therese Roland 49,13 %
21 EO 3S N+2 660 6 27.27
22 EO 3S W+1 -630 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A10 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 56,57 %
23 EO 3C N-1 -100 14 63.64
24 EO 2C N+2 170 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.4 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander 50,59 %
25 EO 3S W = -600 22 100.00
26 EO 5K S+1 620 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
Total : 320,9 / 528 = 60,78 %
PAIRE a11 Christiane Huby -Dominique Sassen
A.6 Jeanine Bontemps -Pierina Divito 48,81 %
1 EO 4P N = 420 12 54.55
2 EO 1S S = 90 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
A13 Claire Derieuw -Diane Deslignes 61,02 %
3 EO 2P N = 110 8 36.36
4 EO 3S N-1 -100 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A.7 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 55,34 %
5 EO 3C W = -140 17 77.27
6 EO 6P S-1 -50 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 55,32 %
7 EO 6S W-1 100 4 18.18
8 EO 6S N = 990 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A.8 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier 45,53 %
9 EO 6C W-1 100 1 4.55
10 EO 50%50% Ajust 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 39,36 %
11 EO 3S W+1 -430 16 72.73
12 EO 2P N = 110 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.9 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn 42,41 %
13 EO 3C E = -140 22 100.00
14 EO 4C E = -420 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Therese Roland 49,13 %
15 EO 4C W+1 -450 14 63.64
16 EO 2S N-3 -150 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.4 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander 50,59 %
19 EO 2C N+2 170 3 13.64
20 EO 5K E = -600 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A11 Thomas Brusselmans -Christian Martinot 49,02 %
21 EO 3S N-2 -200 20 90.91
22 EO 3S W+1 -630 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
A.5 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne 50,91 %
23 EO 3C N-1 -100 14 63.64
24 EO 2P N+3 200 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A12 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 45,98 %
25 EO 3K E+1 -130 17 77.27
26 EO 2PcE-2 500 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
Total : 311,3 / 528 = 58,96 %
PAIRE a.9 Max Poupinel -Christian Neve
A.5 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne 50,91 %
1 EO 3P N+2 200 18 81.82
2 EO 2C E-2 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A12 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 45,98 %
3 EO 1S E+1 -120 20 90.91
4 EO 1S N+1 120 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A.6 Jeanine Bontemps -Pierina Divito 48,81 %
5 EO 4C W = -420 21 95.45
6 EO 6P S-1 -50 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
A13 Claire Derieuw -Diane Deslignes 61,02 %
7 EO 6S W-1 100 4 18.18
8 EO 6S N = 990 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A.7 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 55,34 %
9 EO 6K E-1 100 1 4.55
10 EO 5T S-1 -100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 32,27 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 55,32 %
11 EO 3S W+2 -460 21 95.45
12 EO 3P N-1 -100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
A.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 39,36 %
15 EO 3S E+2 -460 20 90.91
16 EO 3S S-3 -150 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
A.9 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn 42,41 %
17 EO 5K E = -400 19 86.36
18 EO 3P N-1 -100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Therese Roland 49,13 %
19 EO 4C N-1 -50 21 95.45
20 EO 5PcN-2 -500 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A10 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 56,57 %
21 EO 3S N+2 660 6 27.27
22 EO 3S W-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
A.4 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander 50,59 %
23 EO 3P E-1 100 8 36.36
24 EO 3P N = 140 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A11 Thomas Brusselmans -Christian Martinot 49,02 %
25 EO 3K E = -110 8 36.36
26 EO 4C N+1 650 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
Total : 309,2 / 528 = 58,56 %
PAIRE a.2 Thierry Bollansee -Denis Guibert
A.8 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier 45,53 %
1 EO 4P N = 420 12 54.55
2 EO 1S S+1 120 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 42,27 %
A.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 39,36 %
3 EO 1S E+1 -120 20 90.91
4 EO 3S N-1 -100 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
A.9 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn 42,41 %
5 EO 4C W-1 50 7 31.82
6 EO 4P S+1 450 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Therese Roland 49,13 %
7 EO 6S W = -1440 16 72.73
8 EO 6S N = 990 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A10 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 56,57 %
9 EO 6C E = -1430 20 90.91
10 EO 4C E-2 200 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 45,68 %
A.4 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander 50,59 %
11 EO 2S W+2 -180 11 50.00
12 EO 3K W-1 50 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A11 Thomas Brusselmans -Christian Martinot 49,02 %
13 EO 1S S = 90 14 63.64
14 EO 4C E+1 -450 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A.5 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne 50,91 %
15 EO 4C W+1 -450 14 63.64
16 EO 3S S-3 -150 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A12 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 45,98 %
17 EO 4P E-1 50 7 31.82
18 EO 3P S-1 -100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.6 Jeanine Bontemps -Pierina Divito 48,81 %
19 EO 2C S+1 140 13 59.09
20 EO 5K E = -600 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A13 Claire Derieuw -Diane Deslignes 61,02 %
21 EO 3S N-1 -100 14 63.64
22 EO 3S W = -600 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.7 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 55,34 %
23 EO 3C N-1 -100 14 63.64
24 EO 2P N+3 200 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
Total : 301,7 / 528 = 57,14 %
PAIRE a.1 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 55,32 %
1 EO 4P N+1 450 4 18.18
2 EO 1S S-1 -100 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 53,86 %
A.8 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier 45,53 %
3 EO 2S E = -120 20 90.91
4 EO 3S S-1 -100 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
A.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 39,36 %
5 EO 4C W = -420 21 95.45
6 EO 4P S+1 450 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A.9 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn 42,41 %
7 EO 6S W = -1440 16 72.73
8 EO 6S N = 990 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Therese Roland 49,13 %
9 EO 4C W+2 -680 12 54.55
10 EO 2S S = 120 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 32,50 %
A10 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 56,57 %
11 EO 3S W-1 50 1 4.55
12 EO 3P N-3 -300 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.4 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander 50,59 %
13 EO 3P S-1 -100 18 81.82
14 EO 3S E = -400 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A11 Thomas Brusselmans -Christian Martinot 49,02 %
15 EO 4C W+1 -450 14 63.64
16 EO 2C N-1 -50 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.5 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne 50,91 %
17 EO 4K W = -130 14 63.64
18 EO 4P S-1 -100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A12 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 45,98 %
19 EO 3C N = 140 13 59.09
20 EO 5K E = -600 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.6 Jeanine Bontemps -Pierina Divito 48,81 %
21 EO 3S N-1 -100 14 63.64
22 EO 1S W+1 -120 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.7 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 55,34 %
25 EO 3K E+1 -130 17 77.27
26 EO 3S S = 600 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
Total : 301,0 / 528 = 57,01 %
PAIRE a.4 Benedicte Albani -Nathalie de Laminne
A.9 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn 42,41 %
1 EO 4P N = 420 12 54.55
2 EO 1S S+2 150 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
A10 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 56,57 %
5 EO 4C W-1 50 7 31.82
6 EO 4P S+1 450 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A.4 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander 50,59 %
7 EO 6S W = -1440 16 72.73
8 EO 6S S = 990 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A11 Thomas Brusselmans -Christian Martinot 49,02 %
9 EO 5C W+1 -680 12 54.55
10 EO 3C E-1 100 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
A.5 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne 50,91 %
11 EO 3S W+1 -430 16 72.73
12 EO 2P N = 110 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A12 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 45,98 %
13 EO 2P S = 110 9 40.91
14 EO 4C E+1 -450 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.6 Jeanine Bontemps -Pierina Divito 48,81 %
15 EO 4C W+1 -450 14 63.64
16 EO 4C N-3 -150 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A13 Claire Derieuw -Diane Deslignes 61,02 %
17 EO 5K W-1 50 7 31.82
18 EO 3S S+2 660 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
A.7 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 55,34 %
19 EO 2C S+1 140 13 59.09
20 EO 5K E = -600 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 55,32 %
21 EO 3S N-1 -100 14 63.64
22 EO 3S W = -600 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.8 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier 45,53 %
23 EO 4C N-2 -200 21 95.45
24 EO 4P S+1 450 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 39,36 %
25 EO 3K E+1 -130 17 77.27
26 EO 3S S-2 -200 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
Total : 263,7 / 528 = 49,94 %
PAIRE a.7 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
A.4 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander 50,59 %
1 EO 4P N+1 450 4 18.18
2 EO 1S S-1 -100 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 53,86 %
A11 Thomas Brusselmans -Christian Martinot 49,02 %
3 EO 1S N-1 -50 12 54.55
4 EO 2P E-2 200 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.5 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne 50,91 %
5 EO 4C W-1 50 7 31.82
6 EO 6P S-1 -50 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A12 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 45,98 %
7 EO 6S W = -1440 16 72.73
8 EO 6S N = 990 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A13 Claire Derieuw -Diane Deslignes 61,02 %
11 EO 1S W+2 -150 8 36.36
12 EO 2P N = 110 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.7 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 55,34 %
13 EO 2P S = 110 9 40.91
14 EO 4C E+1 -450 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 55,32 %
15 EO 3S E+1 -430 7 31.82
16 EO 2S N = 120 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
A.8 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier 45,53 %
17 EO 5K W-1 50 7 31.82
18 EO 4P S-1 -100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 39,36 %
19 EO 3C N+1 170 3 13.64
20 EO 5K W = -600 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.9 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn 42,41 %
21 EO 3S N-2 -200 20 90.91
22 EO 3S E+1 -630 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Therese Roland 49,13 %
23 EO 3S W-2 200 0 0.00
24 EO 4P S+1 450 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 2,27 %
A10 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 56,57 %
25 EO 5K E-1 100 2 9.09
26 EO 3S S-2 -200 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
Total : 241,7 / 528 = 45,78 %
PAIRE a13 Simone Munsterhjelm -Sylviane Delbeke
A.7 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 55,34 %
1 EO 4P N+1 450 4 18.18
2 EO 1S S+1 120 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 24,09 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 55,32 %
3 EO 1S S-2 -100 16 72.73
4 EO 1S N+1 120 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.8 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier 45,53 %
5 EO 4C W-1 50 7 31.82
6 EO 6P S-1 -50 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 39,36 %
7 EO 6S W-1 100 4 18.18
8 EO 7S N-1 -50 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.9 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn 42,41 %
9 EO 6C E = -1430 20 90.91
10 EO 4C E = -620 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 95,23 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Therese Roland 49,13 %
11 EO 2S W = -120 6 27.27
12 EO 2P N = 110 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A10 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 56,57 %
13 EO 2P S = 110 9 40.91
14 EO 4C E+1 -450 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.4 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander 50,59 %
15 EO 4C W = -420 3 13.64
16 EO 2C N = 110 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
A11 Thomas Brusselmans -Christian Martinot 49,02 %
17 EO 5K W-1 50 7 31.82
18 EO 2P S+1 140 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.5 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne 50,91 %
19 EO 2C S+1 140 13 59.09
20 EO 4K E+1 -150 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.6 Jeanine Bontemps -Pierina Divito 48,81 %
23 EO 2C N = 110 4 18.18
24 EO 2P S+3 200 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A13 Claire Derieuw -Diane Deslignes 61,02 %
25 EO 3K E = -110 8 36.36
26 EO 4C N = 620 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
Total : 232,5 / 528 = 44,03 %
PAIRE a.6 Philippe d'Hoop -Juan del Marmol
A10 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 56,57 %
1 EO 3P N+2 200 18 81.82
2 EO 1S S+2 150 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 43,64 %
A.4 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander 50,59 %
3 EO 2P N = 110 8 36.36
4 EO 2P E-3 300 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A11 Thomas Brusselmans -Christian Martinot 49,02 %
5 EO 4P N = 620 0 0.00
6 EO 4P S+1 450 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
A12 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 45,98 %
9 EO 4C W+1 -650 8 36.36
10 EO 5T S-1 -100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 48,18 %
A.6 Jeanine Bontemps -Pierina Divito 48,81 %
11 EO 3S W+1 -430 16 72.73
12 EO 3P N-1 -100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A13 Claire Derieuw -Diane Deslignes 61,02 %
13 EO 3K E-3 300 0 0.00
14 EO 3S E-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.7 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 55,34 %
15 EO 4P W = -420 3 13.64
16 EO 3K N-2 -100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 55,32 %
17 EO 5K W = -400 19 86.36
18 EO 3S S+1 630 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.8 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier 45,53 %
19 EO 2C N+1 140 13 59.09
20 EO 5K E+1 -620 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 39,36 %
21 EO 3S N+2 660 6 27.27
22 EO 3S W = -600 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.9 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn 42,41 %
23 EO 3C N-1 -100 14 63.64
24 EO 2P N+3 200 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Therese Roland 49,13 %
25 EO 3K E = -110 8 36.36
26 EO 3S S = 600 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
Total : 219,4 / 528 = 41,55 %
PAIRE a12 Benedicte Lemaigre -Brigitte Velge
A13 Claire Derieuw -Diane Deslignes 61,02 %
1 EO 4P N+1 450 4 18.18
2 EO 1S S+1 120 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 24,09 %
A.7 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 55,34 %
3 EO 1S E = -90 14 63.64
4 EO 3S N = 600 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 55,32 %
5 EO 4C W-1 50 7 31.82
6 EO 4P S+2 480 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
A.8 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier 45,53 %
7 EO 6S W-1 100 4 18.18
8 EO 6S N = 990 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 39,36 %
9 EO 6C W = -1430 20 90.91
10 EO 4K N-1 -100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 75,45 %
A.9 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn 42,41 %
11 EO 3S W-1 50 1 4.55
12 EO 2P N = 110 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Therese Roland 49,13 %
13 EO 2P S-1 -100 18 81.82
14 EO 4C E+1 -450 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
A10 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 56,57 %
15 EO 4C W+1 -450 14 63.64
16 EO 2C N = 110 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A.4 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander 50,59 %
17 EO 4K W = -130 14 63.64
18 EO 4P S-1 -100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.5 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne 50,91 %
21 EO 3S N+2 660 6 27.27
22 EO 3S W = -600 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A12 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 45,98 %
23 EO 2C N = 110 4 18.18
24 EO 1S N+2 150 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.6 Jeanine Bontemps -Pierina Divito 48,81 %
25 EO 5K W-2 200 0 0.00
26 EO 3S S+3 690 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 4,55 %
Total : 211,8 / 528 = 40,11 %
PAIRE a10 Miguel Paredes -Manolo Hernandez
A12 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 45,98 %
1 EO 4P S+1 450 4 18.18
2 EO 50%50% Ajust 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.6 Jeanine Bontemps -Pierina Divito 48,81 %
3 EO 1S S+2 150 0 0.00
4 EO 2K S = 90 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A13 Claire Derieuw -Diane Deslignes 61,02 %
5 EO 4P N-1 -100 14 63.64
6 EO 5P S = 450 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.7 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 55,34 %
7 EO 6S W = -1440 16 72.73
8 EO 6S N = 990 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 55,32 %
9 EO 4PcN-3 -500 5 22.73
10 EO 4T N-1 -100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 41,36 %
A.8 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier 45,53 %
11 EO 3T W = -110 4 18.18
12 EO 3K E+1 -130 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 39,36 %
13 EO 2P S+1 140 3 13.64
14 EO 3S E = -400 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Therese Roland 49,13 %
17 EO 4K W = -130 14 63.64
18 EO 3T S+2 150 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A10 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 56,57 %
19 EO 3C N+1 170 3 13.64
20 EO 4K E+1 -150 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
A.4 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander 50,59 %
21 EO 3S N+2 660 6 27.27
22 EO 3S W = -600 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A11 Thomas Brusselmans -Christian Martinot 49,02 %
23 EO 3C N-1 -100 14 63.64
24 EO 2P S+3 200 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.5 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne 50,91 %
25 EO 3K E = -110 8 36.36
26 EO 3S S = 600 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
Total : 205,2 / 528 = 38,86 %
PAIRE a.3 Jan Sassen -Edith Close
A.9 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn 42,41 %
3 EO 1S S+1 120 3 13.64
4 EO 3S N-1 -100 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Therese Roland 49,13 %
5 EO 4C W-1 50 7 31.82
6 EO 6P S-1 -50 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A10 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 56,57 %
7 EO 6S W-1 100 4 18.18
8 EO 3S N+3 490 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.4 Lydia Luyten -Grazia Neuenschwander 50,59 %
9 EO 5C W+1 -680 12 54.55
10 EO 3S S-1 -100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
A11 Thomas Brusselmans -Christian Martinot 49,02 %
11 EO 1S W+3 -180 11 50.00
12 EO 2P N = 110 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.5 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne 50,91 %
13 EO 2P S = 110 9 40.91
14 EO 3S E = -400 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A12 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 45,98 %
15 EO 4C E-2 100 0 0.00
16 EO 2C N+1 140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.6 Jeanine Bontemps -Pierina Divito 48,81 %
17 EO 6KcE-2 300 0 0.00
18 EO 2P S+1 140 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A13 Claire Derieuw -Diane Deslignes 61,02 %
19 EO 2C N+2 170 3 13.64
20 EO 4K E+2 -170 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
A.7 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 55,34 %
21 EO 3S N+3 690 0 0.00
22 EO 3S W = -600 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 55,32 %
23 EO 2C N = 110 4 18.18
24 EO 2P S+3 200 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.8 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier 45,53 %
25 EO 3K E = -110 8 36.36
26 EO 3S S = 600 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
Total : 187,2 / 528 = 35,45 %
|