B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 61,17 A14 Michele Berrier -Christiane Huby
--- 2 57,75 A10 Elena Valsesia -Nicole Blondeau
--- 3 57,38 A.2 Claire Dubois -Bruno Chevalier
--- 4 55,79 A.8 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere
--- 5 55,56 A.1 Grazia Neuenschwander -Sophie Tilemans
--- 6 55,45 A.4 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten
--- 7 53,24 A13 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski
--- 8 50,53 A12 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru
--- 9 47,11 A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Noelle Fosse
--- 10 45,81 A15 Yolande Waerseggers -Therese Dumont de Ch.
--- 11 44,15 A11 Anne Van den Berge -Andre Delacroix
--- 12 43,45 A.9 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson
--- 13 41,59 A.5 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen
--- 14 40,04 A.6 Claire Derieuw -Claire de Quirini
--- 15 39,79 A.3 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 63,79 a.7 Lydia Wildiers -Michel Paquot
--- 2 59,83 a13 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw
--- 3 56,46 a.2 Patrick Gilles -Serge Alard
--- 4 54,72 a12 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory
--- 5 52,69 a.5 Didier Collart -Jacques Podevyn
--- 6 49,22 a.8 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm
--- 7 48,90 a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger
--- 8 48,54 a.4 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys
--- 9 46,82 a14 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
--- 10 46,57 a.9 Laurence del Marmol -Marie Christine Meeus
--- 11 45,95 a11 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
--- 12 44,19 a.6 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve
--- 13 41,78 a10 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Luyten
--- 14 40,40 a.1 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens
--- 15 0,00 a15 -
PAIRE A14 Michele Berrier -Christiane Huby
a12 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 54,72 %
1 NS 4C N = 420 7.7 35.00
2 NS 3P W = -140 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a11 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 45,95 %
3 NS 3P E-1 100 15.4 70.00
4 NS 3S N+3 690 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
a10 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Luyten 41,78 %
5 NS 3C N-1 -100 9.9 45.00
6 NS 4P N+1 450 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a.9 Laurence del Marmol -Marie Christine Meeus 46,57 %
7 NS 3S S-1 -100 4.5 20.45
8 NS 5C S+1 480 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a.8 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm 49,22 %
9 NS 6C W = -1430 7.7 35.00
10 NS 2C S = 110 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
a.7 Lydia Wildiers -Michel Paquot 63,79 %
11 NS 4C N = 420 9.9 45.00
12 NS 4C E = -420 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.6 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 44,19 %
13 NS 3S N = 600 17.5 79.55
14 NS 4C E+2 -480 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a.5 Didier Collart -Jacques Podevyn 52,69 %
15 NS 3C E-2 100 21.9 99.55
16 NS 4C W+1 -650 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
a.4 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 48,54 %
17 NS 4S N+1 460 8 36.36
18 NS 3S E = -400 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 48,90 %
19 NS 5P N = 450 11 50.00
20 NS 4C W-4 400 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a14 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 46,82 %
27 NS 4C N+2 480 20.8 94.55
28 NS 5K E = -400 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
a13 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 59,83 %
29 NS 4C E-1 100 14.3 65.00
30 NS 1S E+1 -120 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
Total : 323,0 / 528 = 61,17 %
PAIRE A10 Elena Valsesia -Nicole Blondeau
a.4 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 48,54 %
1 NS 4C N+1 450 16.5 75.00
2 NS 2T E-2 100 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 87,27 %
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 48,90 %
3 NS 3C N-2 -100 8.8 40.00
4 NS 3S N+3 690 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a.2 Patrick Gilles -Serge Alard 56,46 %
5 NS 3S N-4 -400 0.1 0.45
6 NS 4P N+1 450 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a.1 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 40,40 %
7 NS 4C N+1 650 21.9 99.55
8 NS 3C S+2 200 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a15 - 0,00 %
9 NS BYE 0 0.00
10 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a14 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 46,82 %
11 NS 4C S = 420 9.9 45.00
12 NS 2C E = -110 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a10 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Luyten 41,78 %
19 NS 4P S+2 480 19.7 89.55
20 NS 4C W-2 200 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 84,55 %
a.9 Laurence del Marmol -Marie Christine Meeus 46,57 %
21 NS 3C W-1 50 14 63.64
22 NS 4C E+2 -680 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.8 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm 49,22 %
23 NS 1S S = 90 15.4 70.00
24 NS 6C W = -980 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.7 Lydia Wildiers -Michel Paquot 63,79 %
25 NS 2S S-2 -100 6 27.27
26 NS 2S E+2 -180 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
a.6 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 44,19 %
27 NS 4C N = 420 6.6 30.00
28 NS 5K W = -400 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.5 Didier Collart -Jacques Podevyn 52,69 %
29 NS 1C E-1 100 14.3 65.00
30 NS 1K S-1 -50 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
Total : 279,5 / 484 = 57,75 %
PAIRE A.2 Claire Dubois -Bruno Chevalier
a.2 Patrick Gilles -Serge Alard 56,46 %
3 NS 3P E-1 100 15.4 70.00
4 NS 3C S+2 200 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a.1 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 40,40 %
5 NS 3S S = 600 21.9 99.55
6 NS 4P N = 420 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a15 - 0,00 %
7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a14 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 46,82 %
9 NS 3S E+2 -660 17.5 79.55
10 NS 3P W-2 200 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 87,05 %
a13 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 59,83 %
11 NS 4C N = 420 9.9 45.00
12 NS 3C E = -140 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
a12 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 54,72 %
13 NS 4CcE-2 500 11 50.00
14 NS 6C E = -980 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a11 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 45,95 %
15 NS 4T W+1 -150 11 50.00
16 NS 4C W+1 -650 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a10 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Luyten 41,78 %
17 NS 4P N+2 480 16 72.73
18 NS 3S E = -400 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a.9 Laurence del Marmol -Marie Christine Meeus 46,57 %
19 NS 4P S+2 480 19.7 89.55
20 NS 2C W-1 100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a.8 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm 49,22 %
21 NS 3S S-2 -200 0 0.00
22 NS 4T S-3 -150 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.7 Lydia Wildiers -Michel Paquot 63,79 %
23 NS 1S S = 90 15.4 70.00
24 NS 6C W = -980 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.6 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 44,19 %
25 NS 2S S+1 150 20 90.91
26 NS 2S E-1 100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
Total : 277,7 / 484 = 57,38 %
PAIRE A.8 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere
a15 - 0,00 %
1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a14 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 46,82 %
3 NS 4P E-2 200 21.9 99.55
4 NS 4K N = 130 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a13 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 59,83 %
5 NS 1S S+2 150 18.6 84.55
6 NS 4P S-2 -100 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a12 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 54,72 %
7 NS 4C N = 620 19.7 89.55
8 NS 4C S+1 450 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.8 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm 49,22 %
15 NS 4T W = -130 16.5 75.00
16 NS 4C W = -620 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
a.7 Lydia Wildiers -Michel Paquot 63,79 %
17 NS 4S N-1 -50 0 0.00
18 NS 3S E = -400 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.6 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 44,19 %
19 NS 5P S+1 480 19.7 89.55
20 NS 3C W-1 100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a.5 Didier Collart -Jacques Podevyn 52,69 %
21 NS 2C W+1 -140 3 13.64
22 NS 4C E+1 -650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a.4 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 48,54 %
23 NS 1S S = 90 15.4 70.00
24 NS 4C W+2 -480 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 48,90 %
25 NS 1S S-2 -100 6 27.27
26 NS 1S E-1 100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.2 Patrick Gilles -Serge Alard 56,46 %
27 NS 4C N+1 450 16.5 75.00
28 NS 3S W+1 -430 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.1 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 40,40 %
29 NS 4C E-3 300 21.9 99.55
30 NS 1S E+1 -120 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
Total : 270,0 / 484 = 55,79 %
PAIRE A.1 Grazia Neuenschwander -Sophie Tilemans
a.1 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 40,40 %
1 NS 4C S+1 450 16.5 75.00
2 NS 4P W-1 50 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
a15 - 0,00 %
3 NS BYE 0 0.00
4 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a14 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 46,82 %
5 NS 2P W-3 150 18.6 84.55
6 NS 4P N-1 -50 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a13 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 59,83 %
7 NS 3C N+1 170 15.4 70.00
8 NS 4C S+1 450 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 67,50 %
a12 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 54,72 %
9 NS 4C W+2 -680 14.3 65.00
10 NS 2P W-1 100 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a11 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 45,95 %
11 NS 3S N+1 430 18.6 84.55
12 NS 2C E-2 100 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 92,05 %
a10 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Luyten 41,78 %
13 NS 3C W = -140 0.1 0.45
14 NS 4C E+3 -510 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
a.9 Laurence del Marmol -Marie Christine Meeus 46,57 %
15 NS 5T W = -550 0.1 0.45
16 NS 5C W-1 100 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.8 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm 49,22 %
17 NS 4P N = 420 2 9.09
18 NS 3S E = -400 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a.7 Lydia Wildiers -Michel Paquot 63,79 %
19 NS 5P S = 450 11 50.00
20 NS 3C W-1 100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.6 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 44,19 %
21 NS 3C W-1 50 14 63.64
22 NS 3T S-2 -100 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
a.5 Didier Collart -Jacques Podevyn 52,69 %
23 NS 1ScS-2 -500 0.1 0.45
24 NS 4C W+2 -480 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
Total : 268,9 / 484 = 55,56 %
PAIRE A.4 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten
a.4 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 48,54 %
7 NS 4C N-1 -100 4.5 20.45
8 NS 4C S+1 450 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 48,90 %
9 NS 6C W-1 100 20.8 94.55
10 NS 2T E = -90 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a.2 Patrick Gilles -Serge Alard 56,46 %
11 NS 4C N = 420 9.9 45.00
12 NS 2K N = 90 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a.1 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 40,40 %
13 NS 2S N = 120 4.5 20.45
14 NS 4C E+2 -480 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
a15 - 0,00 %
15 NS BYE 0 0.00
16 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a14 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 46,82 %
17 NS 3S N+1 430 4 18.18
18 NS 5K E-1 50 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a13 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 59,83 %
19 NS 4C S+1 450 11 50.00
20 NS 2C W = -110 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a12 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 54,72 %
21 NS 3S S-1 -100 8 36.36
22 NS 2TcS-1 -100 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a11 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 45,95 %
23 NS 1S S = 90 15.4 70.00
24 NS 6C W = -980 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a10 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Luyten 41,78 %
25 NS 1S S-1 -50 11 50.00
26 NS 3T E-3 300 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a.9 Laurence del Marmol -Marie Christine Meeus 46,57 %
27 NS 3S S+1 430 13.2 60.00
28 NS 4K W+1 -150 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a.8 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm 49,22 %
29 NS 2P E+1 -140 7.7 35.00
30 NS 1S E+1 -120 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
Total : 268,4 / 484 = 55,45 %
PAIRE A13 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski
a10 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Luyten 41,78 %
1 NS 4C N+1 450 16.5 75.00
2 NS 3KcN-2 -500 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a.9 Laurence del Marmol -Marie Christine Meeus 46,57 %
3 NS 3P E-1 100 15.4 70.00
4 NS 4C S = 620 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a.8 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm 49,22 %
5 NS 4C N-2 -200 4.5 20.45
6 NS 4P N+2 480 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a.7 Lydia Wildiers -Michel Paquot 63,79 %
7 NS 3C N+1 170 15.4 70.00
8 NS 5C S = 450 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 67,50 %
a.6 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 44,19 %
9 NS 3S E+3 -690 11 50.00
10 NS 2C S-2 -200 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a.5 Didier Collart -Jacques Podevyn 52,69 %
11 NS 4C N-1 -50 1.2 5.45
12 NS 1S E-1 50 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a.4 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 48,54 %
13 NS 3S N = 600 17.5 79.55
14 NS 4C E+2 -480 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 48,90 %
15 NS 5T W = -400 5.5 25.00
16 NS 6C W-1 100 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
a.2 Patrick Gilles -Serge Alard 56,46 %
17 NS 4P N+2 480 16 72.73
18 NS 3S E = -400 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a13 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 59,83 %
25 NS 2S S-3 -150 0 0.00
26 NS 3C N = 140 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a12 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 54,72 %
27 NS 4C N+1 450 16.5 75.00
28 NS 3S W+1 -430 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a11 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 45,95 %
29 NS 3C E = -140 7.7 35.00
30 NS 2S W = -120 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
Total : 281,1 / 528 = 53,24 %
PAIRE A12 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru
a.8 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm 49,22 %
1 NS 6C N-1 -50 2.3 10.45
2 NS 3P W = -140 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
a.7 Lydia Wildiers -Michel Paquot 63,79 %
3 NS 2P E+1 -140 3.4 15.45
4 NS 3C S+2 200 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a.6 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 44,19 %
5 NS 2P W-1 50 13.2 60.00
6 NS 4P N = 420 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.5 Didier Collart -Jacques Podevyn 52,69 %
7 NS 4C N-1 -100 4.5 20.45
8 NS 4C S+1 450 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
a.4 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 48,54 %
9 NS 4C W+2 -680 14.3 65.00
10 NS 2P W-1 100 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 48,90 %
11 NS 4C N = 420 9.9 45.00
12 NS 2C E+1 -140 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
a.2 Patrick Gilles -Serge Alard 56,46 %
13 NS 4CcE-1 200 8.8 40.00
14 NS 4C E+2 -480 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.1 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 40,40 %
15 NS 3K S-1 -100 19.7 89.55
16 NS 4C W+1 -650 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a12 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 54,72 %
23 NS 1S S = 90 15.4 70.00
24 NS 6C W = -980 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a11 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 45,95 %
25 NS 3K E-1 100 14 63.64
26 NS 4K E-1 100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a10 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Luyten 41,78 %
27 NS 4C N+2 480 20.8 94.55
28 NS 3S W+1 -430 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a.9 Laurence del Marmol -Marie Christine Meeus 46,57 %
29 NS 4C E = -620 0.1 0.45
30 NS 1S W = -90 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
Total : 266,8 / 528 = 50,53 %
PAIRE A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Noelle Fosse
a13 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 59,83 %
1 NS 4C N+1 450 16.5 75.00
2 NS 3C S-2 -200 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a12 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 54,72 %
3 NS 2P E = -110 6.6 30.00
4 NS 3C S+2 200 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a11 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 45,95 %
5 NS 3T S+1 130 15.4 70.00
6 NS 4P N+1 450 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a.7 Lydia Wildiers -Michel Paquot 63,79 %
13 NS 3S N = 600 17.5 79.55
14 NS 4C E+2 -480 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a.6 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 44,19 %
15 NS 4T W+1 -150 11 50.00
16 NS 3S E+3 -690 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a.5 Didier Collart -Jacques Podevyn 52,69 %
17 NS 4P N+2 480 16 72.73
18 NS 3S E+1 -430 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a.4 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 48,54 %
19 NS 6C S-2 -100 0.1 0.45
20 NS 2C W-1 100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 48,90 %
21 NS 1S S-1 -100 8 36.36
22 NS 4C E+2 -680 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.2 Patrick Gilles -Serge Alard 56,46 %
23 NS 1S S = 90 15.4 70.00
24 NS 6C W = -980 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.1 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 40,40 %
25 NS 3T S = 110 16 72.73
26 NS 3K W+1 -130 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a15 - 0,00 %
27 NS BYE 0 0.00
28 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a14 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 46,82 %
29 NS 4C E-1 100 14.3 65.00
30 NS 1S E+1 -120 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
Total : 228,0 / 484 = 47,11 %
PAIRE A15 Yolande Waerseggers -Therese Dumont de Ch.
a14 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 46,82 %
1 NS 6C N-1 -50 2.3 10.45
2 NS 2P W+1 -140 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
a13 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 59,83 %
3 NS 3P E-1 100 15.4 70.00
4 NS 3K N+3 170 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 45,23 %
a12 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 54,72 %
5 NS 3S N-2 -200 4.5 20.45
6 NS 4P N-1 -50 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
a11 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 45,95 %
7 NS 2C N+1 140 11 50.00
8 NS 3C S+2 200 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
a10 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Luyten 41,78 %
9 NS 6C W-1 100 20.8 94.55
10 NS 3P W-2 200 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 94,55 %
a.9 Laurence del Marmol -Marie Christine Meeus 46,57 %
11 NS 3S S-1 -50 1.2 5.45
12 NS 2C E = -110 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a.8 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm 49,22 %
13 NS 3S N = 600 17.5 79.55
14 NS 4C W+2 -480 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a.7 Lydia Wildiers -Michel Paquot 63,79 %
15 NS 4T E+1 -150 11 50.00
16 NS 3S E+2 -660 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a.6 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 44,19 %
17 NS 4P N+1 450 6 27.27
18 NS 3S E = -400 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.5 Didier Collart -Jacques Podevyn 52,69 %
19 NS 5C S = 450 11 50.00
20 NS 4C W-2 200 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a.4 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 48,54 %
21 NS 1S S-1 -100 8 36.36
22 NS 4C E+2 -680 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a15 - 0,00 %
29 NS BYE 0 0.00
30 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 221,7 / 484 = 45,81 %
PAIRE A11 Anne Van den Berge -Andre Delacroix
a.6 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 44,19 %
1 NS 4C N = 420 7.7 35.00
2 NS 3S E = -400 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 32,50 %
a.5 Didier Collart -Jacques Podevyn 52,69 %
3 NS 3P E = -140 3.4 15.45
4 NS 2P W-2 200 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a.4 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 48,54 %
5 NS 3C N-1 -100 9.9 45.00
6 NS 4P N-1 -50 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 48,90 %
7 NS 4C N-1 -100 4.5 20.45
8 NS 4C S+1 450 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
a.2 Patrick Gilles -Serge Alard 56,46 %
9 NS 6S E = -1440 2.3 10.45
10 NS 2P W = -110 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 12,95 %
a.1 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 40,40 %
11 NS 4C S+1 450 21.9 99.55
12 NS 2C E = -110 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a15 - 0,00 %
13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a11 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 45,95 %
21 NS 1S S = 90 19 86.36
22 NS 2C E+4 -230 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a10 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Luyten 41,78 %
23 NS 1S S-2 -200 3.4 15.45
24 NS 6C W = -980 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a.9 Laurence del Marmol -Marie Christine Meeus 46,57 %
25 NS 2C N+2 170 22 100.00
26 NS 2S E-1 100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
a.8 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm 49,22 %
27 NS 4C N = 420 6.6 30.00
28 NS 3K W+2 -150 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
a.7 Lydia Wildiers -Michel Paquot 63,79 %
29 NS 3C E+1 -170 3.4 15.45
30 NS 3T W+1 -130 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 12,95 %
Total : 213,7 / 484 = 44,15 %
PAIRE A.9 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson
a.2 Patrick Gilles -Serge Alard 56,46 %
1 NS 5C N = 450 16.5 75.00
2 NS 4P W = -420 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.1 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 40,40 %
3 NS 4P E-1 100 15.4 70.00
4 NS 3K N+2 150 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
a15 - 0,00 %
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a14 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 46,82 %
7 NS 2C N+2 170 15.4 70.00
8 NS 3C S+2 200 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 45,23 %
a13 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 59,83 %
9 NS 6S E = -1440 2.3 10.45
10 NS 2P W = -110 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 12,95 %
a.9 Laurence del Marmol -Marie Christine Meeus 46,57 %
17 NS 4P N+2 480 16 72.73
18 NS 3S E = -400 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a.8 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm 49,22 %
19 NS 4P S+1 450 11 50.00
20 NS 2C W = -110 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a.7 Lydia Wildiers -Michel Paquot 63,79 %
21 NS 2C W+1 -140 3 13.64
22 NS 4C E+2 -680 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
a.6 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 44,19 %
23 NS 1S S = 90 15.4 70.00
24 NS 4C E+2 -480 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
a.5 Didier Collart -Jacques Podevyn 52,69 %
25 NS 3T N-1 -50 11 50.00
26 NS 2S E+3 -210 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a.4 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 48,54 %
27 NS 4C N = 420 6.6 30.00
28 NS 3K W+1 -130 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 48,90 %
29 NS 4C E-1 100 14.3 65.00
30 NS 1S E+1 -120 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
Total : 210,3 / 484 = 43,45 %
PAIRE A.5 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen
a.9 Laurence del Marmol -Marie Christine Meeus 46,57 %
1 NS 6C N-1 -50 2.3 10.45
2 NS 2S E+2 -180 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a.5 Didier Collart -Jacques Podevyn 52,69 %
9 NS 6C W = -1430 7.7 35.00
10 NS 2P W-1 100 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.4 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 48,54 %
11 NS 4C N = 420 9.9 45.00
12 NS 3K N-3 -300 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 48,90 %
13 NS 3S N = 600 17.5 79.55
14 NS 5C E+1 -480 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a.2 Patrick Gilles -Serge Alard 56,46 %
15 NS 3S W+1 -430 2.3 10.45
16 NS 3S E+2 -660 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 12,95 %
a.1 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 40,40 %
17 NS 4P N+2 480 16 72.73
18 NS 3S E = -400 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a15 - 0,00 %
19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a14 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 46,82 %
21 NS 1S S+2 150 22 100.00
22 NS 5C E = -650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a13 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 59,83 %
23 NS 1S S-2 -200 3.4 15.45
24 NS 6S W = -990 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 7,95 %
a12 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 54,72 %
25 NS 2S S-2 -100 6 27.27
26 NS 2S E+2 -180 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
a11 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 45,95 %
27 NS 3C N+1 170 0.1 0.45
28 NS 3S W+1 -430 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
a10 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Luyten 41,78 %
29 NS 2P N = 110 19.7 89.55
30 NS 1S W = -90 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 87,05 %
Total : 201,3 / 484 = 41,59 %
PAIRE A.6 Claire Derieuw -Claire de Quirini
a11 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 45,95 %
1 NS 5C N = 450 16.5 75.00
2 NS 3S E+1 -430 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
a10 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Luyten 41,78 %
3 NS 3C N-3 -150 0.1 0.45
4 NS 2P W-2 200 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a.6 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 44,19 %
11 NS 3S N+1 430 18.6 84.55
12 NS 2C E = -110 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
a.5 Didier Collart -Jacques Podevyn 52,69 %
13 NS 4K N = 130 6.6 30.00
14 NS 4C E+2 -480 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.4 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 48,54 %
15 NS 5T W = -400 5.5 25.00
16 NS 6C W-1 100 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 48,90 %
17 NS 4P N+2 480 16 72.73
18 NS 3S E+1 -430 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a.2 Patrick Gilles -Serge Alard 56,46 %
19 NS 5T E-2 200 3.4 15.45
20 NS 4C W-2 200 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.1 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 40,40 %
21 NS 1S S = 90 19 86.36
22 NS 4C E+2 -680 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a15 - 0,00 %
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a14 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 46,82 %
25 NS 2P E+1 -140 2 9.09
26 NS 4K E-1 100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a13 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 59,83 %
27 NS 4C N = 420 6.6 30.00
28 NS 3S W+3 -490 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
a12 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 54,72 %
29 NS 3C E+1 -170 3.4 15.45
30 NS 2C N-3 -150 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 7,95 %
Total : 193,8 / 484 = 40,04 %
PAIRE A.3 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 48,90 %
5 NS 2S N-2 -200 4.5 20.45
6 NS 4P N = 420 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
a.2 Patrick Gilles -Serge Alard 56,46 %
7 NS 4C N-1 -100 4.5 20.45
8 NS 3C S+1 170 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
a.1 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens 40,40 %
9 NS 6S E = -1440 2.3 10.45
10 NS 2P W-1 100 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a15 - 0,00 %
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a14 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 46,82 %
13 NS 2C E = -110 2.3 10.45
14 NS 6C E = -980 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 7,95 %
a13 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 59,83 %
15 NS 3T W+1 -130 16.5 75.00
16 NS 4C W = -620 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
a12 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 54,72 %
17 NS 4P N+2 480 16 72.73
18 NS 3S E = -400 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a11 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 45,95 %
19 NS 3P S+2 200 3.4 15.45
20 NS 4C W-1 100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a10 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Luyten 41,78 %
21 NS 3C W-1 50 14 63.64
22 NS 2C E+3 -200 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.9 Laurence del Marmol -Marie Christine Meeus 46,57 %
23 NS 1S E = -90 6.6 30.00
24 NS 6C W = -980 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
a.8 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm 49,22 %
25 NS 2S S = 120 18 81.82
26 NS 3K E+1 -130 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a.7 Lydia Wildiers -Michel Paquot 63,79 %
27 NS 4C N = 420 6.6 30.00
28 NS 3S W+1 -430 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
Total : 192,6 / 484 = 39,79 %
PAIRE a.7 Lydia Wildiers -Michel Paquot
A12 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 50,53 %
3 EO 2P E+1 -140 18.6 84.55
4 EO 3C S+2 200 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 53,24 %
7 EO 3C N+1 170 6.6 30.00
8 EO 5C S = 450 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 32,50 %
A14 Michele Berrier -Christiane Huby 61,17 %
11 EO 4C N = 420 12.1 55.00
12 EO 4C E = -420 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Noelle Fosse 47,11 %
13 EO 3S N = 600 4.5 20.45
14 EO 4C E+2 -480 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A15 Yolande Waerseggers -Therese Dumont de Ch. 45,81 %
15 EO 4T E+1 -150 11 50.00
16 EO 3S E+2 -660 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A.8 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 55,79 %
17 EO 4S N-1 -50 22 100.00
18 EO 3S E = -400 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.1 Grazia Neuenschwander -Sophie Tilemans 55,56 %
19 EO 5P S = 450 11 50.00
20 EO 3C W-1 100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.9 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 43,45 %
21 EO 2C W+1 -140 19 86.36
22 EO 4C E+2 -680 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
A.2 Claire Dubois -Bruno Chevalier 57,38 %
23 EO 1S S = 90 6.6 30.00
24 EO 6C W = -980 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A10 Elena Valsesia -Nicole Blondeau 57,75 %
25 EO 2S S-2 -100 16 72.73
26 EO 2S E+2 -180 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
A.3 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 39,79 %
27 EO 4C N = 420 15.4 70.00
28 EO 3S W+1 -430 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
A11 Anne Van den Berge -Andre Delacroix 44,15 %
29 EO 3C E+1 -170 18.6 84.55
30 EO 3T W+1 -130 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 87,05 %
Total : 336,8 / 528 = 63,79 %
PAIRE a13 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Noelle Fosse 47,11 %
1 EO 4C N+1 450 5.5 25.00
2 EO 3C S-2 -200 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A15 Yolande Waerseggers -Therese Dumont de Ch. 45,81 %
3 EO 3P E-1 100 6.6 30.00
4 EO 3K N+3 170 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 54,77 %
A.8 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 55,79 %
5 EO 1S S+2 150 3.4 15.45
6 EO 4P S-2 -100 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A.1 Grazia Neuenschwander -Sophie Tilemans 55,56 %
7 EO 3C N+1 170 6.6 30.00
8 EO 4C S+1 450 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 32,50 %
A.9 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 43,45 %
9 EO 6S E = -1440 19.7 89.55
10 EO 2P W = -110 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 87,05 %
A.2 Claire Dubois -Bruno Chevalier 57,38 %
11 EO 4C N = 420 12.1 55.00
12 EO 3C E = -140 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
A.3 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 39,79 %
15 EO 3T W+1 -130 5.5 25.00
16 EO 4C W = -620 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
A.4 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten 55,45 %
19 EO 4C S+1 450 11 50.00
20 EO 2C W = -110 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A.5 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 41,59 %
23 EO 1S S-2 -200 18.6 84.55
24 EO 6S W = -990 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 92,05 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 53,24 %
25 EO 2S S-3 -150 22 100.00
26 EO 3C N = 140 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.6 Claire Derieuw -Claire de Quirini 40,04 %
27 EO 4C N = 420 15.4 70.00
28 EO 3S W+3 -490 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
A14 Michele Berrier -Christiane Huby 61,17 %
29 EO 4C E-1 100 7.7 35.00
30 EO 1S E+1 -120 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
Total : 315,9 / 528 = 59,83 %
PAIRE a.2 Patrick Gilles -Serge Alard
A.9 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 43,45 %
1 EO 5C N = 450 5.5 25.00
2 EO 4P W = -420 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.2 Claire Dubois -Bruno Chevalier 57,38 %
3 EO 3P E-1 100 6.6 30.00
4 EO 3C S+2 200 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A10 Elena Valsesia -Nicole Blondeau 57,75 %
5 EO 3S N-4 -400 21.9 99.55
6 EO 4P N+1 450 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A.3 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 39,79 %
7 EO 4C N-1 -100 17.5 79.55
8 EO 3C S+1 170 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
A11 Anne Van den Berge -Andre Delacroix 44,15 %
9 EO 6S E = -1440 19.7 89.55
10 EO 2P W = -110 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 87,05 %
A.4 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten 55,45 %
11 EO 4C N = 420 12.1 55.00
12 EO 2K N = 90 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A12 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 50,53 %
13 EO 4CcE-1 200 13.2 60.00
14 EO 4C E+2 -480 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.5 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 41,59 %
15 EO 3S W+1 -430 19.7 89.55
16 EO 3S E+2 -660 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 87,05 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 53,24 %
17 EO 4P N+2 480 6 27.27
18 EO 3S E = -400 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.6 Claire Derieuw -Claire de Quirini 40,04 %
19 EO 5T E-2 200 18.6 84.55
20 EO 4C W-2 200 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Noelle Fosse 47,11 %
23 EO 1S S = 90 6.6 30.00
24 EO 6C W = -980 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.8 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 55,79 %
27 EO 4C N+1 450 5.5 25.00
28 EO 3S W+1 -430 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
Total : 298,1 / 528 = 56,46 %
PAIRE a12 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory
A14 Michele Berrier -Christiane Huby 61,17 %
1 EO 4C N = 420 14.3 65.00
2 EO 3P W = -140 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Noelle Fosse 47,11 %
3 EO 2P E = -110 15.4 70.00
4 EO 3C S+2 200 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A15 Yolande Waerseggers -Therese Dumont de Ch. 45,81 %
5 EO 3S N-2 -200 17.5 79.55
6 EO 4P N-1 -50 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
A.8 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 55,79 %
7 EO 4C N = 620 2.3 10.45
8 EO 4C S+1 450 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.1 Grazia Neuenschwander -Sophie Tilemans 55,56 %
9 EO 4C W+2 -680 7.7 35.00
10 EO 2P W-1 100 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A.2 Claire Dubois -Bruno Chevalier 57,38 %
13 EO 4CcE-2 500 11 50.00
14 EO 6C E = -980 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A.3 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 39,79 %
17 EO 4P N+2 480 6 27.27
18 EO 3S E = -400 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.4 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten 55,45 %
21 EO 3S S-1 -100 14 63.64
22 EO 2TcS-1 -100 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A12 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 50,53 %
23 EO 1S S = 90 6.6 30.00
24 EO 6C W = -980 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.5 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 41,59 %
25 EO 2S S-2 -100 16 72.73
26 EO 2S E+2 -180 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 53,24 %
27 EO 4C N+1 450 5.5 25.00
28 EO 3S W+1 -430 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.6 Claire Derieuw -Claire de Quirini 40,04 %
29 EO 3C E+1 -170 18.6 84.55
30 EO 2C N-3 -150 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 92,05 %
Total : 288,9 / 528 = 54,72 %
PAIRE a.5 Didier Collart -Jacques Podevyn
A11 Anne Van den Berge -Andre Delacroix 44,15 %
3 EO 3P E = -140 18.6 84.55
4 EO 2P W-2 200 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A12 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 50,53 %
7 EO 4C N-1 -100 17.5 79.55
8 EO 4C S+1 450 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
A.5 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 41,59 %
9 EO 6C W = -1430 14.3 65.00
10 EO 2P W-1 100 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 53,24 %
11 EO 4C N-1 -50 20.8 94.55
12 EO 1S E-1 50 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A.6 Claire Derieuw -Claire de Quirini 40,04 %
13 EO 4K N = 130 15.4 70.00
14 EO 4C E+2 -480 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A14 Michele Berrier -Christiane Huby 61,17 %
15 EO 3C E-2 100 0.1 0.45
16 EO 4C W+1 -650 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Noelle Fosse 47,11 %
17 EO 4P N+2 480 6 27.27
18 EO 3S E+1 -430 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A15 Yolande Waerseggers -Therese Dumont de Ch. 45,81 %
19 EO 5C S = 450 11 50.00
20 EO 4C W-2 200 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A.8 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 55,79 %
21 EO 2C W+1 -140 19 86.36
22 EO 4C E+1 -650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A.1 Grazia Neuenschwander -Sophie Tilemans 55,56 %
23 EO 1ScS-2 -500 21.9 99.55
24 EO 4C W+2 -480 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.9 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 43,45 %
25 EO 3T N-1 -50 11 50.00
26 EO 2S E+3 -210 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A10 Elena Valsesia -Nicole Blondeau 57,75 %
29 EO 1C E-1 100 7.7 35.00
30 EO 1K S-1 -50 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
Total : 278,2 / 528 = 52,69 %
PAIRE a.8 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm
A12 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 50,53 %
1 EO 6C N-1 -50 19.7 89.55
2 EO 3P W = -140 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 53,24 %
5 EO 4C N-2 -200 17.5 79.55
6 EO 4P N+2 480 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A14 Michele Berrier -Christiane Huby 61,17 %
9 EO 6C W = -1430 14.3 65.00
10 EO 2C S = 110 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
A15 Yolande Waerseggers -Therese Dumont de Ch. 45,81 %
13 EO 3S N = 600 4.5 20.45
14 EO 4C W+2 -480 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A.8 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 55,79 %
15 EO 4T W = -130 5.5 25.00
16 EO 4C W = -620 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
A.1 Grazia Neuenschwander -Sophie Tilemans 55,56 %
17 EO 4P N = 420 20 90.91
18 EO 3S E = -400 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A.9 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 43,45 %
19 EO 4P S+1 450 11 50.00
20 EO 2C W = -110 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A.2 Claire Dubois -Bruno Chevalier 57,38 %
21 EO 3S S-2 -200 22 100.00
22 EO 4T S-3 -150 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A10 Elena Valsesia -Nicole Blondeau 57,75 %
23 EO 1S S = 90 6.6 30.00
24 EO 6C W = -980 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.3 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 39,79 %
25 EO 2S S = 120 4 18.18
26 EO 3K E+1 -130 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A11 Anne Van den Berge -Andre Delacroix 44,15 %
27 EO 4C N = 420 15.4 70.00
28 EO 3K W+2 -150 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
A.4 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten 55,45 %
29 EO 2P E+1 -140 14.3 65.00
30 EO 1S E+1 -120 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
Total : 259,9 / 528 = 49,22 %
PAIRE a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger
A10 Elena Valsesia -Nicole Blondeau 57,75 %
3 EO 3C N-2 -100 13.2 60.00
4 EO 3S N+3 690 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A.3 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 39,79 %
5 EO 2S N-2 -200 17.5 79.55
6 EO 4P N = 420 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A11 Anne Van den Berge -Andre Delacroix 44,15 %
7 EO 4C N-1 -100 17.5 79.55
8 EO 4C S+1 450 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
A.4 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten 55,45 %
9 EO 6C W-1 100 1.2 5.45
10 EO 2T E = -90 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A12 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 50,53 %
11 EO 4C N = 420 12.1 55.00
12 EO 2C E+1 -140 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
A.5 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 41,59 %
13 EO 3S N = 600 4.5 20.45
14 EO 5C E+1 -480 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 53,24 %
15 EO 5T W = -400 16.5 75.00
16 EO 6C W-1 100 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
A.6 Claire Derieuw -Claire de Quirini 40,04 %
17 EO 4P N+2 480 6 27.27
18 EO 3S E+1 -430 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A14 Michele Berrier -Christiane Huby 61,17 %
19 EO 5P N = 450 11 50.00
20 EO 4C W-4 400 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Noelle Fosse 47,11 %
21 EO 1S S-1 -100 14 63.64
22 EO 4C E+2 -680 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.8 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 55,79 %
25 EO 1S S-2 -100 16 72.73
26 EO 1S E-1 100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.9 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 43,45 %
29 EO 4C E-1 100 7.7 35.00
30 EO 1S E+1 -120 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
Total : 258,2 / 528 = 48,90 %
PAIRE a.4 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys
A10 Elena Valsesia -Nicole Blondeau 57,75 %
1 EO 4C N+1 450 5.5 25.00
2 EO 2T E-2 100 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 12,73 %
A11 Anne Van den Berge -Andre Delacroix 44,15 %
5 EO 3C N-1 -100 12.1 55.00
6 EO 4P N-1 -50 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A.4 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten 55,45 %
7 EO 4C N-1 -100 17.5 79.55
8 EO 4C S+1 450 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
A12 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 50,53 %
9 EO 4C W+2 -680 7.7 35.00
10 EO 2P W-1 100 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A.5 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 41,59 %
11 EO 4C N = 420 12.1 55.00
12 EO 3K N-3 -300 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 53,24 %
13 EO 3S N = 600 4.5 20.45
14 EO 4C E+2 -480 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A.6 Claire Derieuw -Claire de Quirini 40,04 %
15 EO 5T W = -400 16.5 75.00
16 EO 6C W-1 100 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
A14 Michele Berrier -Christiane Huby 61,17 %
17 EO 4S N+1 460 14 63.64
18 EO 3S E = -400 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Noelle Fosse 47,11 %
19 EO 6C S-2 -100 21.9 99.55
20 EO 2C W-1 100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
A15 Yolande Waerseggers -Therese Dumont de Ch. 45,81 %
21 EO 1S S-1 -100 14 63.64
22 EO 4C E+2 -680 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.8 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 55,79 %
23 EO 1S S = 90 6.6 30.00
24 EO 4C W+2 -480 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
A.9 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 43,45 %
27 EO 4C N = 420 15.4 70.00
28 EO 3K W+1 -130 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
Total : 256,3 / 528 = 48,54 %
PAIRE a14 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
A15 Yolande Waerseggers -Therese Dumont de Ch. 45,81 %
1 EO 6C N-1 -50 19.7 89.55
2 EO 2P W+1 -140 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
A.8 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 55,79 %
3 EO 4P E-2 200 0.1 0.45
4 EO 4K N = 130 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.1 Grazia Neuenschwander -Sophie Tilemans 55,56 %
5 EO 2P W-3 150 3.4 15.45
6 EO 4P N-1 -50 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.9 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 43,45 %
7 EO 2C N+2 170 6.6 30.00
8 EO 3C S+2 200 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 54,77 %
A.2 Claire Dubois -Bruno Chevalier 57,38 %
9 EO 3S E+2 -660 4.5 20.45
10 EO 3P W-2 200 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 12,95 %
A10 Elena Valsesia -Nicole Blondeau 57,75 %
11 EO 4C S = 420 12.1 55.00
12 EO 2C E = -110 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.3 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 39,79 %
13 EO 2C E = -110 19.7 89.55
14 EO 6C E = -980 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 92,05 %
A.4 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten 55,45 %
17 EO 3S N+1 430 18 81.82
18 EO 5K E-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.5 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 41,59 %
21 EO 1S S+2 150 0 0.00
22 EO 5C E = -650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A.6 Claire Derieuw -Claire de Quirini 40,04 %
25 EO 2P E+1 -140 20 90.91
26 EO 4K E-1 100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A14 Michele Berrier -Christiane Huby 61,17 %
27 EO 4C N+2 480 1.2 5.45
28 EO 5K E = -400 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Noelle Fosse 47,11 %
29 EO 4C E-1 100 7.7 35.00
30 EO 1S E+1 -120 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
Total : 247,2 / 528 = 46,82 %
PAIRE a.9 Laurence del Marmol -Marie Christine Meeus
A.5 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 41,59 %
1 EO 6C N-1 -50 19.7 89.55
2 EO 2S E+2 -180 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 53,24 %
3 EO 3P E-1 100 6.6 30.00
4 EO 4C S = 620 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A14 Michele Berrier -Christiane Huby 61,17 %
7 EO 3S S-1 -100 17.5 79.55
8 EO 5C S+1 480 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A15 Yolande Waerseggers -Therese Dumont de Ch. 45,81 %
11 EO 3S S-1 -50 20.8 94.55
12 EO 2C E = -110 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A.1 Grazia Neuenschwander -Sophie Tilemans 55,56 %
15 EO 5T W = -550 21.9 99.55
16 EO 5C W-1 100 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.9 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 43,45 %
17 EO 4P N+2 480 6 27.27
18 EO 3S E = -400 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.2 Claire Dubois -Bruno Chevalier 57,38 %
19 EO 4P S+2 480 2.3 10.45
20 EO 2C W-1 100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A10 Elena Valsesia -Nicole Blondeau 57,75 %
21 EO 3C W-1 50 8 36.36
22 EO 4C E+2 -680 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.3 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 39,79 %
23 EO 1S E = -90 15.4 70.00
24 EO 6C W = -980 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
A11 Anne Van den Berge -Andre Delacroix 44,15 %
25 EO 2C N+2 170 0 0.00
26 EO 2S E-1 100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
A.4 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten 55,45 %
27 EO 3S S+1 430 8.8 40.00
28 EO 4K W+1 -150 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A12 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 50,53 %
29 EO 4C E = -620 21.9 99.55
30 EO 1S W = -90 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
Total : 245,9 / 528 = 46,57 %
PAIRE a11 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
A.6 Claire Derieuw -Claire de Quirini 40,04 %
1 EO 5C N = 450 5.5 25.00
2 EO 3S E+1 -430 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
A14 Michele Berrier -Christiane Huby 61,17 %
3 EO 3P E-1 100 6.6 30.00
4 EO 3S N+3 690 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Noelle Fosse 47,11 %
5 EO 3T S+1 130 6.6 30.00
6 EO 4P N+1 450 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A15 Yolande Waerseggers -Therese Dumont de Ch. 45,81 %
7 EO 2C N+1 140 11 50.00
8 EO 3C S+2 200 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A.1 Grazia Neuenschwander -Sophie Tilemans 55,56 %
11 EO 3S N+1 430 3.4 15.45
12 EO 2C E-2 100 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 7,95 %
A.2 Claire Dubois -Bruno Chevalier 57,38 %
15 EO 4T W+1 -150 11 50.00
16 EO 4C W+1 -650 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.3 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 39,79 %
19 EO 3P S+2 200 18.6 84.55
20 EO 4C W-1 100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A11 Anne Van den Berge -Andre Delacroix 44,15 %
21 EO 1S S = 90 3 13.64
22 EO 2C E+4 -230 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A.4 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten 55,45 %
23 EO 1S S = 90 6.6 30.00
24 EO 6C W = -980 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A12 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 50,53 %
25 EO 3K E-1 100 8 36.36
26 EO 4K E-1 100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.5 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 41,59 %
27 EO 3C N+1 170 21.9 99.55
28 EO 3S W+1 -430 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 53,24 %
29 EO 3C E = -140 14.3 65.00
30 EO 2S W = -120 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
Total : 242,6 / 528 = 45,95 %
PAIRE a.6 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve
A11 Anne Van den Berge -Andre Delacroix 44,15 %
1 EO 4C N = 420 14.3 65.00
2 EO 3S E = -400 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 67,50 %
A12 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 50,53 %
5 EO 2P W-1 50 8.8 40.00
6 EO 4P N = 420 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 53,24 %
9 EO 3S E+3 -690 11 50.00
10 EO 2C S-2 -200 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A.6 Claire Derieuw -Claire de Quirini 40,04 %
11 EO 3S N+1 430 3.4 15.45
12 EO 2C E = -110 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
A14 Michele Berrier -Christiane Huby 61,17 %
13 EO 3S N = 600 4.5 20.45
14 EO 4C E+2 -480 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Noelle Fosse 47,11 %
15 EO 4T W+1 -150 11 50.00
16 EO 3S E+3 -690 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A15 Yolande Waerseggers -Therese Dumont de Ch. 45,81 %
17 EO 4P N+1 450 16 72.73
18 EO 3S E = -400 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.8 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 55,79 %
19 EO 5P S+1 480 2.3 10.45
20 EO 3C W-1 100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A.1 Grazia Neuenschwander -Sophie Tilemans 55,56 %
21 EO 3C W-1 50 8 36.36
22 EO 3T S-2 -100 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
A.9 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 43,45 %
23 EO 1S S = 90 6.6 30.00
24 EO 4C E+2 -480 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
A.2 Claire Dubois -Bruno Chevalier 57,38 %
25 EO 2S S+1 150 2 9.09
26 EO 2S E-1 100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A10 Elena Valsesia -Nicole Blondeau 57,75 %
27 EO 4C N = 420 15.4 70.00
28 EO 5K W = -400 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
Total : 233,3 / 528 = 44,19 %
PAIRE a10 Jean de Villenfagne -Lydia Luyten
A13 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 53,24 %
1 EO 4C N+1 450 5.5 25.00
2 EO 3KcN-2 -500 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A.6 Claire Derieuw -Claire de Quirini 40,04 %
3 EO 3C N-3 -150 21.9 99.55
4 EO 2P W-2 200 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A14 Michele Berrier -Christiane Huby 61,17 %
5 EO 3C N-1 -100 12.1 55.00
6 EO 4P N+1 450 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A15 Yolande Waerseggers -Therese Dumont de Ch. 45,81 %
9 EO 6C W-1 100 1.2 5.45
10 EO 3P W-2 200 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 5,45 %
A.1 Grazia Neuenschwander -Sophie Tilemans 55,56 %
13 EO 3C W = -140 21.9 99.55
14 EO 4C E+3 -510 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
A.2 Claire Dubois -Bruno Chevalier 57,38 %
17 EO 4P N+2 480 6 27.27
18 EO 3S E = -400 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A10 Elena Valsesia -Nicole Blondeau 57,75 %
19 EO 4P S+2 480 2.3 10.45
20 EO 4C W-2 200 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 15,45 %
A.3 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 39,79 %
21 EO 3C W-1 50 8 36.36
22 EO 2C E+3 -200 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A11 Anne Van den Berge -Andre Delacroix 44,15 %
23 EO 1S S-2 -200 18.6 84.55
24 EO 6C W = -980 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A.4 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten 55,45 %
25 EO 1S S-1 -50 11 50.00
26 EO 3T E-3 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A12 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 50,53 %
27 EO 4C N+2 480 1.2 5.45
28 EO 3S W+1 -430 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A.5 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 41,59 %
29 EO 2P N = 110 2.3 10.45
30 EO 1S W = -90 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 12,95 %
Total : 220,6 / 528 = 41,78 %
PAIRE a.1 Patricia Bardy -Helene Christiaens
A.1 Grazia Neuenschwander -Sophie Tilemans 55,56 %
1 EO 4C S+1 450 5.5 25.00
2 EO 4P W-1 50 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
A.9 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 43,45 %
3 EO 4P E-1 100 6.6 30.00
4 EO 3K N+2 150 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
A.2 Claire Dubois -Bruno Chevalier 57,38 %
5 EO 3S S = 600 0.1 0.45
6 EO 4P N = 420 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A10 Elena Valsesia -Nicole Blondeau 57,75 %
7 EO 4C N+1 650 0.1 0.45
8 EO 3C S+2 200 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A.3 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 39,79 %
9 EO 6S E = -1440 19.7 89.55
10 EO 2P W-1 100 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A11 Anne Van den Berge -Andre Delacroix 44,15 %
11 EO 4C S+1 450 0.1 0.45
12 EO 2C E = -110 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.4 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten 55,45 %
13 EO 2S N = 120 17.5 79.55
14 EO 4C E+2 -480 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
A12 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 50,53 %
15 EO 3K S-1 -100 2.3 10.45
16 EO 4C W+1 -650 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A.5 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 41,59 %
17 EO 4P N+2 480 6 27.27
18 EO 3S E = -400 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.6 Claire Derieuw -Claire de Quirini 40,04 %
21 EO 1S S = 90 3 13.64
22 EO 4C E+2 -680 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Noelle Fosse 47,11 %
25 EO 3T S = 110 6 27.27
26 EO 3K W+1 -130 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.8 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 55,79 %
29 EO 4C E-3 300 0.1 0.45
30 EO 1S E+1 -120 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
Total : 213,3 / 528 = 40,40 %
PAIRE a15 -
A.8 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 55,79 %
1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.1 Grazia Neuenschwander -Sophie Tilemans 55,56 %
3 EO BYE 0 0.00
4 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.9 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 43,45 %
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.2 Claire Dubois -Bruno Chevalier 57,38 %
7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A10 Elena Valsesia -Nicole Blondeau 57,75 %
9 EO BYE 0 0.00
10 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.3 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 39,79 %
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A11 Anne Van den Berge -Andre Delacroix 44,15 %
13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.4 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten 55,45 %
15 EO BYE 0 0.00
16 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.5 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 41,59 %
19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.6 Claire Derieuw -Claire de Quirini 40,04 %
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Noelle Fosse 47,11 %
27 EO BYE 0 0.00
28 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A15 Yolande Waerseggers -Therese Dumont de Ch. 45,81 %
29 EO BYE 0 0.00
30 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 660 = 0,00 %
|