B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 53,57 N.6 Simone Munsterhjelm -Colette Heerinckx
--- 2 53,27 N10 Anne Brans -Daniel Couvreur
--- 3 52,98 N.3 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger
--- 4 52,38 N11 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten
--- 5 52,08 N.9 Claire Derieuw -Chantal de Lichtervelde
--- 6 49,40 N.8 Pascale Ortegat -Philippe van der Gracht
--- ~ 49,40 N.7 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory
--- 8 48,51 N.2 Christiane Huby -Michele Berrier
--- 9 47,92 N.4 Alexandre Viot -Serge Alard
--- ~ 47,92 N.5 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Annette Fobe
--- 11 42,56 N.1 Alan Beckman -Annie Zeimes
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 59,82 e.5 Antoinette Jourdain -Francoise Duren
--- 2 58,93 e.4 Jean Marie Schmiliver -Patrick Gilles
--- 3 57,44 e.7 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve
--- 4 56,25 e.8 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw
--- 5 53,87 e.9 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys
--- 6 48,81 e10 Marie Christine Remy -Noelle Fosse
--- ~ 46,73 e11 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Rita Swinnen
--- 8 43,75 e.2 Patricia Bardy -Patrizia Vaccani
--- 9 43,15 e.6 Suzanne Klausen -Anne de Maleingreau
--- ~ 42,26 e.3 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
--- 11 38,99 e.1 Catherine de Moffarts -Didier Collart
PAIRE N.6 Simone Munsterhjelm -Colette Heerinckx
e11 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Rita Swinnen 46,73 %
1 NS 4P E-1 50 9 64.29
2 NS 2T E-2 100 12 85.71
3 NS 4P S+2 480 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
e10 Marie Christine Remy -Noelle Fosse 48,81 %
4 NS 2P E+3 -200 3 21.43
5 NS 3S N+1 630 8 57.14
6 NS 2P E+1 -140 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
e.6 Suzanne Klausen -Anne de Maleingreau 43,15 %
16 NS 5K W-1 100 12 85.71
17 NS 1P W+2 -140 2 14.29
18 NS 2S E+2 -180 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
e.5 Antoinette Jourdain -Francoise Duren 59,82 %
19 NS 4P W = -620 4 28.57
20 NS 3S N-3 -300 1 7.14
21 NS 2S N-1 -100 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 21,43 %
e.4 Jean Marie Schmiliver -Patrick Gilles 58,93 %
22 NS 4PcE-1 200 10 71.43
23 NS 3S E = -600 6 42.86
24 NS 4P W = -420 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
e.3 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 42,26 %
25 NS 4C S = 420 7 50.00
26 NS 5CcS-2 -500 12 85.71
27 NS 4C W = -420 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
e.2 Patricia Bardy -Patrizia Vaccani 43,75 %
28 NS 4P N = 620 11 78.57
29 NS 2P E+1 -140 4 28.57
30 NS 6K S+1 940 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
e.1 Catherine de Moffarts -Didier Collart 38,99 %
31 NS 4K W = -130 6 42.86
32 NS 3S N+2 460 12 85.71
33 NS 2S N+3 210 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
Total : 180,0 / 336 = 53,57 %
PAIRE N10 Anne Brans -Daniel Couvreur
e.8 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 56,25 %
1 NS 6P E-3 150 14 100.00
2 NS 3P W+1 -170 0 0.00
3 NS 4P S+1 450 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
e.7 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 57,44 %
4 NS 2K W+3 -150 10 71.43
5 NS 3S N+2 660 13 92.86
6 NS 2P E+2 -170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
e.6 Suzanne Klausen -Anne de Maleingreau 43,15 %
7 NS 3T W-4 400 14 100.00
8 NS 4P S+1 450 7 50.00
9 NS 2T N+1 110 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
e.5 Antoinette Jourdain -Francoise Duren 59,82 %
10 NS 4P W+1 -650 3 21.43
11 NS 2T N+2 130 10 71.43
12 NS 2S E = -120 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
e.4 Jean Marie Schmiliver -Patrick Gilles 58,93 %
13 NS 4P S = 620 12 85.71
14 NS 4C S+1 450 3 21.43
15 NS 4P E+2 -480 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
e.3 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 42,26 %
16 NS 4C E+1 -650 0 0.00
17 NS 1P W+1 -110 9 64.29
18 NS 2S E+2 -180 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
e10 Marie Christine Remy -Noelle Fosse 48,81 %
28 NS 2P N+2 170 5 35.71
29 NS 2P E = -110 11 78.57
30 NS 7K S = 1440 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
e.9 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 53,87 %
31 NS 5K W-1 50 13 92.86
32 NS 3S N+1 430 7 50.00
33 NS 2S N = 120 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
Total : 179,0 / 336 = 53,27 %
PAIRE N.3 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger
e.3 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 42,26 %
7 NS 3C E-1 100 8 57.14
8 NS 3S N+1 430 0 0.00
9 NS 3P S+1 170 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
e.2 Patricia Bardy -Patrizia Vaccani 43,75 %
10 NS 4P E = -620 10 71.43
11 NS 2C E-2 100 7 50.00
12 NS 2S E-1 50 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
e.1 Catherine de Moffarts -Didier Collart 38,99 %
13 NS 4P S-1 -100 4 28.57
14 NS 4C S+1 450 3 21.43
15 NS 4P E = -420 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
e11 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Rita Swinnen 46,73 %
16 NS 4PcN-2 -300 6 42.86
17 NS 1P W = -80 14 100.00
18 NS 3S E = -400 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
e10 Marie Christine Remy -Noelle Fosse 48,81 %
19 NS 4C E-1 100 13 92.86
20 NS 3T S = 110 11 78.57
21 NS 3C S-3 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
e.9 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 53,87 %
22 NS 4C S = 420 14 100.00
23 NS 3S E = -600 6 42.86
24 NS 4P W-1 50 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
e.8 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 56,25 %
25 NS 4C S = 420 7 50.00
26 NS 5P W = -650 5 35.71
27 NS 4C W+2 -480 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
e.7 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 57,44 %
28 NS 1P N+3 170 5 35.71
29 NS 2P E = -110 11 78.57
30 NS 4P N-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
Total : 178,0 / 336 = 52,98 %
PAIRE N11 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten
e10 Marie Christine Remy -Noelle Fosse 48,81 %
1 NS 4P E+1 -450 4 28.57
2 NS 4P W-3 150 14 100.00
3 NS 4P N+2 480 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
e.9 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 53,87 %
4 NS 2P E+3 -200 3 21.43
5 NS 2S N+2 180 0 0.00
6 NS 3K N = 110 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
e.8 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 56,25 %
7 NS 3C E-1 100 8 57.14
8 NS 4P S+2 480 14 100.00
9 NS 3C E-1 100 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
e.7 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 57,44 %
10 NS 4P W+1 -650 3 21.43
11 NS 1S S = 90 4 28.57
12 NS 2S E = -120 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
e.6 Suzanne Klausen -Anne de Maleingreau 43,15 %
13 NS 4P S-1 -100 4 28.57
14 NS 3S N+2 460 10 71.43
15 NS 4P E = -420 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
e.5 Antoinette Jourdain -Francoise Duren 59,82 %
16 NS 5PcN-2 -300 6 42.86
17 NS 1P W+1 -110 9 64.29
18 NS 3S E = -400 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
e.4 Jean Marie Schmiliver -Patrick Gilles 58,93 %
19 NS 4P W = -620 4 28.57
20 NS 3T S = 110 11 78.57
21 NS 1S N = 90 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
e11 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Rita Swinnen 46,73 %
31 NS 4P S-1 -100 10 71.43
32 NS 2P S+3 200 2 14.29
33 NS 1S N+4 210 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
Total : 176,0 / 336 = 52,38 %
PAIRE N.9 Claire Derieuw -Chantal de Lichtervelde
e.6 Suzanne Klausen -Anne de Maleingreau 43,15 %
1 NS 4P E-2 100 12 85.71
2 NS 3P E-1 50 7 50.00
3 NS 3S S+1 430 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
e.5 Antoinette Jourdain -Francoise Duren 59,82 %
4 NS 2P E+3 -200 3 21.43
5 NS 3S N = 600 4 28.57
6 NS 4K N-1 -50 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
e.4 Jean Marie Schmiliver -Patrick Gilles 58,93 %
7 NS 3C E-2 200 12 85.71
8 NS 4P S+1 450 7 50.00
9 NS 2T N+1 110 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
e.3 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 42,26 %
10 NS 4P W = -620 10 71.43
11 NS 2P N+1 140 12 85.71
12 NS 2S E-1 50 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
e.2 Patricia Bardy -Patrizia Vaccani 43,75 %
13 NS 4P S-1 -100 4 28.57
14 NS 4C S+2 480 14 100.00
15 NS 4P E+2 -480 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
e.9 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 53,87 %
25 NS 4C S = 420 7 50.00
26 NS 5C S-1 -100 14 100.00
27 NS 4C W+1 -450 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
e.8 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 56,25 %
28 NS 4P N = 620 11 78.57
29 NS 2P E+2 -170 0 0.00
30 NS 4S S+3 520 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
e.7 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 57,44 %
31 NS 5PcN-3 -800 0 0.00
32 NS 3S N+2 460 12 85.71
33 NS 2S N = 120 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
Total : 175,0 / 336 = 52,08 %
PAIRE N.8 Pascale Ortegat -Philippe van der Gracht
e.4 Jean Marie Schmiliver -Patrick Gilles 58,93 %
1 NS 4P E+1 -450 4 28.57
2 NS 4P W-1 50 7 50.00
3 NS 4P N+2 480 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
e.3 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 42,26 %
4 NS 3P E = -140 12 85.71
5 NS 3S N+1 630 8 57.14
6 NS 2P E+1 -140 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
e.2 Patricia Bardy -Patrizia Vaccani 43,75 %
7 NS 2C E = -110 4 28.57
8 NS 4P S+1 450 7 50.00
9 NS 2P S+1 140 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
e.1 Catherine de Moffarts -Didier Collart 38,99 %
10 NS 5C S-2 -200 14 100.00
11 NS 1S S+2 150 14 100.00
12 NS 3S E-1 50 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 90,48 %
e.8 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 56,25 %
22 NS 4PcW-1 200 10 71.43
23 NS 3S W = -600 6 42.86
24 NS 4P W = -420 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
e.7 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 57,44 %
25 NS 4C S = 420 7 50.00
26 NS 4P W+2 -680 1 7.14
27 NS 4C W+1 -450 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
e.6 Suzanne Klausen -Anne de Maleingreau 43,15 %
28 NS 3P N+1 170 5 35.71
29 NS 2P E = -110 11 78.57
30 NS 6S N+1 1020 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
e.5 Antoinette Jourdain -Francoise Duren 59,82 %
31 NS 5P S-2 -200 2 14.29
32 NS 5C N-1 -50 0 0.00
33 NS 2S N-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 4,76 %
Total : 166,0 / 336 = 49,40 %
PAIRE N.7 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory
e.2 Patricia Bardy -Patrizia Vaccani 43,75 %
1 NS 4P E-1 50 9 64.29
2 NS 2P W-1 50 7 50.00
3 NS 4P N+2 480 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
e.1 Catherine de Moffarts -Didier Collart 38,99 %
4 NS 3K W+1 -130 14 100.00
5 NS 3S N+1 630 8 57.14
6 NS 3P E = -140 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
e11 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Rita Swinnen 46,73 %
7 NS 3C S-3 -300 1 7.14
8 NS 4C S+1 450 7 50.00
9 NS 3P S-1 -50 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
e.7 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 57,44 %
19 NS 4P W = -620 4 28.57
20 NS 4T S-1 -100 8 57.14
21 NS 3PcW-1 100 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
e.6 Suzanne Klausen -Anne de Maleingreau 43,15 %
22 NS 3PcE = -730 0 0.00
23 NS 3S W-1 100 12 85.71
24 NS 4P W-1 50 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
e.5 Antoinette Jourdain -Francoise Duren 59,82 %
25 NS 4C S = 420 7 50.00
26 NS 4P W = -620 9 64.29
27 NS 4C W+2 -480 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
e.4 Jean Marie Schmiliver -Patrick Gilles 58,93 %
28 NS 3C W = -140 0 0.00
29 NS 2P E+1 -140 4 28.57
30 NS 6K S+1 940 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
e.3 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 42,26 %
31 NS 4K W = -130 6 42.86
32 NS 3S S+2 460 12 85.71
33 NS 2S N+2 180 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 166,0 / 336 = 49,40 %
PAIRE N.2 Christiane Huby -Michele Berrier
e.2 Patricia Bardy -Patrizia Vaccani 43,75 %
4 NS 3P E+1 -170 8 57.14
5 NS 3S N+2 660 13 92.86
6 NS 3P E = -140 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
e.1 Catherine de Moffarts -Didier Collart 38,99 %
7 NS 3K N-3 -300 1 7.14
8 NS 4P S+1 450 7 50.00
9 NS 3P S = 140 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
e11 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Rita Swinnen 46,73 %
10 NS 4P W = -620 10 71.43
11 NS 2C W-2 100 7 50.00
12 NS 1S E-2 100 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
e10 Marie Christine Remy -Noelle Fosse 48,81 %
13 NS 4P N-1 -100 4 28.57
14 NS 3S N+2 460 10 71.43
15 NS 4P E+1 -450 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
e.9 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 53,87 %
16 NS 3S W = -600 2 14.29
17 NS 3C W = -140 2 14.29
18 NS 2K E+1 -110 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
e.8 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 56,25 %
19 NS 4P W = -620 4 28.57
20 NS 2P N-2 -200 5 35.71
21 NS 2P W+2 -170 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
e.7 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 57,44 %
22 NS 4P W-1 100 6 42.86
23 NS 3S W+1 -630 1 7.14
24 NS 3S E = -400 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
e.6 Suzanne Klausen -Anne de Maleingreau 43,15 %
25 NS 4C S = 420 7 50.00
26 NS 4P W+1 -650 5 35.71
27 NS 4C W = -420 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 163,0 / 336 = 48,51 %
PAIRE N.4 Alexandre Viot -Serge Alard
e.4 Jean Marie Schmiliver -Patrick Gilles 58,93 %
10 NS 4P W+1 -650 3 21.43
11 NS 3T N-1 -50 1 7.14
12 NS 2S E = -120 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
e.3 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 42,26 %
13 NS 4P S = 620 12 85.71
14 NS 4C S+1 450 3 21.43
15 NS 4P E+2 -480 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
e.2 Patricia Bardy -Patrizia Vaccani 43,75 %
16 NS 5PcN-2 -300 6 42.86
17 NS 1P W+1 -110 9 64.29
18 NS 3S E = -400 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
e.1 Catherine de Moffarts -Didier Collart 38,99 %
19 NS 3P W+1 -170 10 71.43
20 NS 2CcE-1 200 14 100.00
21 NS 3T N+1 130 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,48 %
e11 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Rita Swinnen 46,73 %
22 NS 4C S-1 -50 3 21.43
23 NS 3S E+1 -630 1 7.14
24 NS 4P E = -420 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 14,29 %
e10 Marie Christine Remy -Noelle Fosse 48,81 %
25 NS 4C S = 420 7 50.00
26 NS 4P W+2 -680 1 7.14
27 NS 4C W-1 50 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
e.9 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 53,87 %
28 NS 3P N+1 170 5 35.71
29 NS 2P E+1 -140 4 28.57
30 NS 7K S = 1440 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
e.8 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 56,25 %
31 NS 5K W-1 50 13 92.86
32 NS 3S S+1 430 7 50.00
33 NS 2S N+1 150 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 161,0 / 336 = 47,92 %
PAIRE N.5 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Annette Fobe
e.9 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 53,87 %
1 NS 4P E+1 -450 4 28.57
2 NS 2P W-1 50 7 50.00
3 NS 4C N = 420 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
e.5 Antoinette Jourdain -Francoise Duren 59,82 %
13 NS 4P S = 620 12 85.71
14 NS 4C S+1 450 3 21.43
15 NS 4P E+2 -480 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
e.4 Jean Marie Schmiliver -Patrick Gilles 58,93 %
16 NS 4K W = -130 10 71.43
17 NS 3C W = -140 2 14.29
18 NS 3S E+1 -430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
e.3 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 42,26 %
19 NS 3S W-1 100 13 92.86
20 NS 3S S-3 -300 1 7.14
21 NS Pass Passe 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
e.2 Patricia Bardy -Patrizia Vaccani 43,75 %
22 NS 5K N-1 -50 3 21.43
23 NS 4T W = -130 10 71.43
24 NS 4P W-1 50 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
e.1 Catherine de Moffarts -Didier Collart 38,99 %
25 NS 4C S = 420 7 50.00
26 NS 4P W = -620 9 64.29
27 NS 4C W-1 50 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
e11 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Rita Swinnen 46,73 %
28 NS 4PcN = 790 14 100.00
29 NS 2P E = -110 11 78.57
30 NS 6K S+1 940 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
e10 Marie Christine Remy -Noelle Fosse 48,81 %
31 NS 3K W+1 -130 6 42.86
32 NS 3S N = 400 4 28.57
33 NS 2S N = 120 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 161,0 / 336 = 47,92 %
PAIRE N.1 Alan Beckman -Annie Zeimes
e.1 Catherine de Moffarts -Didier Collart 38,99 %
1 NS 3CcN-3 -500 0 0.00
2 NS 2P W+1 -140 2 14.29
3 NS 4P S = 420 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 7,14 %
e11 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Rita Swinnen 46,73 %
4 NS 3C N-2 -200 3 21.43
5 NS 2S N+3 210 2 14.29
6 NS 4C W-4 400 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
e10 Marie Christine Remy -Noelle Fosse 48,81 %
7 NS 2C E-1 100 8 57.14
8 NS 4P S+1 450 7 50.00
9 NS 3P S-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
e.9 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 53,87 %
10 NS 4P W+1 -650 3 21.43
11 NS 1S S-1 -50 1 7.14
12 NS 2S E = -120 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
e.8 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 56,25 %
13 NS 4P S-1 -100 4 28.57
14 NS 3S N+2 460 10 71.43
15 NS 4P E+2 -480 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
e.7 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 57,44 %
16 NS 4PcN = 590 14 100.00
17 NS 1P W+1 -110 9 64.29
18 NS 3S E = -400 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
e.6 Suzanne Klausen -Anne de Maleingreau 43,15 %
19 NS 4P W = -620 4 28.57
20 NS 3S S-2 -200 5 35.71
21 NS 1S N = 90 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
e.5 Antoinette Jourdain -Francoise Duren 59,82 %
22 NS 4PcW-1 200 10 71.43
23 NS 3S E-2 200 14 100.00
24 NS 4P W-1 50 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
Total : 143,0 / 336 = 42,56 %
PAIRE e.5 Antoinette Jourdain -Francoise Duren
N.9 Claire Derieuw -Chantal de Lichtervelde 52,08 %
4 EO 2P E+3 -200 11 78.57
5 EO 3S N = 600 10 71.43
6 EO 4K N-1 -50 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
N10 Anne Brans -Daniel Couvreur 53,27 %
10 EO 4P W+1 -650 11 78.57
11 EO 2T N+2 130 4 28.57
12 EO 2S E = -120 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
N.5 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Annette Fobe 47,92 %
13 EO 4P S = 620 2 14.29
14 EO 4C S+1 450 11 78.57
15 EO 4P E+2 -480 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
N11 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 52,38 %
16 EO 5PcN-2 -300 8 57.14
17 EO 1P W+1 -110 5 35.71
18 EO 3S E = -400 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
N.6 Simone Munsterhjelm -Colette Heerinckx 53,57 %
19 EO 4P W = -620 10 71.43
20 EO 3S N-3 -300 13 92.86
21 EO 2S N-1 -100 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 78,57 %
N.1 Alan Beckman -Annie Zeimes 42,56 %
22 EO 4PcW-1 200 4 28.57
23 EO 3S E-2 200 0 0.00
24 EO 4P W-1 50 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
N.7 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 49,40 %
25 EO 4C S = 420 7 50.00
26 EO 4P W = -620 5 35.71
27 EO 4C W+2 -480 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
N.8 Pascale Ortegat -Philippe van der Gracht 49,40 %
31 EO 5P S-2 -200 12 85.71
32 EO 5C N-1 -50 14 100.00
33 EO 2S N-1 -50 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 95,24 %
Total : 201,0 / 336 = 59,82 %
PAIRE e.4 Jean Marie Schmiliver -Patrick Gilles
N.8 Pascale Ortegat -Philippe van der Gracht 49,40 %
1 EO 4P E+1 -450 10 71.43
2 EO 4P W-1 50 7 50.00
3 EO 4P N+2 480 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
N.9 Claire Derieuw -Chantal de Lichtervelde 52,08 %
7 EO 3C E-2 200 2 14.29
8 EO 4P S+1 450 7 50.00
9 EO 2T N+1 110 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
N.4 Alexandre Viot -Serge Alard 47,92 %
10 EO 4P W+1 -650 11 78.57
11 EO 3T N-1 -50 13 92.86
12 EO 2S E = -120 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
N10 Anne Brans -Daniel Couvreur 53,27 %
13 EO 4P S = 620 2 14.29
14 EO 4C S+1 450 11 78.57
15 EO 4P E+2 -480 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
N.5 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Annette Fobe 47,92 %
16 EO 4K W = -130 4 28.57
17 EO 3C W = -140 12 85.71
18 EO 3S E+1 -430 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
N11 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 52,38 %
19 EO 4P W = -620 10 71.43
20 EO 3T S = 110 3 21.43
21 EO 1S N = 90 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
N.6 Simone Munsterhjelm -Colette Heerinckx 53,57 %
22 EO 4PcE-1 200 4 28.57
23 EO 3S E = -600 8 57.14
24 EO 4P W = -420 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
N.7 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 49,40 %
28 EO 3C W = -140 14 100.00
29 EO 2P E+1 -140 10 71.43
30 EO 6K S+1 940 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
Total : 198,0 / 336 = 58,93 %
PAIRE e.7 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve
N10 Anne Brans -Daniel Couvreur 53,27 %
4 EO 2K W+3 -150 4 28.57
5 EO 3S N+2 660 1 7.14
6 EO 2P E+2 -170 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
N11 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 52,38 %
10 EO 4P W+1 -650 11 78.57
11 EO 1S S = 90 10 71.43
12 EO 2S E = -120 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
N.1 Alan Beckman -Annie Zeimes 42,56 %
16 EO 4PcN = 590 0 0.00
17 EO 1P W+1 -110 5 35.71
18 EO 3S E = -400 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
N.7 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 49,40 %
19 EO 4P W = -620 10 71.43
20 EO 4T S-1 -100 6 42.86
21 EO 3PcW-1 100 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
N.2 Christiane Huby -Michele Berrier 48,51 %
22 EO 4P W-1 100 8 57.14
23 EO 3S W+1 -630 13 92.86
24 EO 3S E = -400 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
N.8 Pascale Ortegat -Philippe van der Gracht 49,40 %
25 EO 4C S = 420 7 50.00
26 EO 4P W+2 -680 13 92.86
27 EO 4C W+1 -450 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
N.3 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger 52,98 %
28 EO 1P N+3 170 9 64.29
29 EO 2P E = -110 3 21.43
30 EO 4P N-2 -100 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
N.9 Claire Derieuw -Chantal de Lichtervelde 52,08 %
31 EO 5PcN-3 -800 14 100.00
32 EO 3S N+2 460 2 14.29
33 EO 2S N = 120 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
Total : 193,0 / 336 = 57,44 %
PAIRE e.8 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw
N10 Anne Brans -Daniel Couvreur 53,27 %
1 EO 6P E-3 150 0 0.00
2 EO 3P W+1 -170 14 100.00
3 EO 4P S+1 450 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
N11 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 52,38 %
7 EO 3C E-1 100 6 42.86
8 EO 4P S+2 480 0 0.00
9 EO 3C E-1 100 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
N.1 Alan Beckman -Annie Zeimes 42,56 %
13 EO 4P S-1 -100 10 71.43
14 EO 3S N+2 460 4 28.57
15 EO 4P E+2 -480 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
N.2 Christiane Huby -Michele Berrier 48,51 %
19 EO 4P W = -620 10 71.43
20 EO 2P N-2 -200 9 64.29
21 EO 2P W+2 -170 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
N.8 Pascale Ortegat -Philippe van der Gracht 49,40 %
22 EO 4PcW-1 200 4 28.57
23 EO 3S W = -600 8 57.14
24 EO 4P W = -420 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
N.3 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger 52,98 %
25 EO 4C S = 420 7 50.00
26 EO 5P W = -650 9 64.29
27 EO 4C W+2 -480 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
N.9 Claire Derieuw -Chantal de Lichtervelde 52,08 %
28 EO 4P N = 620 3 21.43
29 EO 2P E+2 -170 14 100.00
30 EO 4S S+3 520 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
N.4 Alexandre Viot -Serge Alard 47,92 %
31 EO 5K W-1 50 1 7.14
32 EO 3S S+1 430 7 50.00
33 EO 2S N+1 150 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 189,0 / 336 = 56,25 %
PAIRE e.9 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys
N.5 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Annette Fobe 47,92 %
1 EO 4P E+1 -450 10 71.43
2 EO 2P W-1 50 7 50.00
3 EO 4C N = 420 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
N11 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 52,38 %
4 EO 2P E+3 -200 11 78.57
5 EO 2S N+2 180 14 100.00
6 EO 3K N = 110 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
N.1 Alan Beckman -Annie Zeimes 42,56 %
10 EO 4P W+1 -650 11 78.57
11 EO 1S S-1 -50 13 92.86
12 EO 2S E = -120 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
N.2 Christiane Huby -Michele Berrier 48,51 %
16 EO 3S W = -600 12 85.71
17 EO 3C W = -140 12 85.71
18 EO 2K E+1 -110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
N.3 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger 52,98 %
22 EO 4C S = 420 0 0.00
23 EO 3S E = -600 8 57.14
24 EO 4P W-1 50 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
N.9 Claire Derieuw -Chantal de Lichtervelde 52,08 %
25 EO 4C S = 420 7 50.00
26 EO 5C S-1 -100 0 0.00
27 EO 4C W+1 -450 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
N.4 Alexandre Viot -Serge Alard 47,92 %
28 EO 3P N+1 170 9 64.29
29 EO 2P E+1 -140 10 71.43
30 EO 7K S = 1440 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
N10 Anne Brans -Daniel Couvreur 53,27 %
31 EO 5K W-1 50 1 7.14
32 EO 3S N+1 430 7 50.00
33 EO 2S N = 120 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
Total : 181,0 / 336 = 53,87 %
PAIRE e10 Marie Christine Remy -Noelle Fosse
N11 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 52,38 %
1 EO 4P E+1 -450 10 71.43
2 EO 4P W-3 150 0 0.00
3 EO 4P N+2 480 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
N.6 Simone Munsterhjelm -Colette Heerinckx 53,57 %
4 EO 2P E+3 -200 11 78.57
5 EO 3S N+1 630 6 42.86
6 EO 2P E+1 -140 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
N.1 Alan Beckman -Annie Zeimes 42,56 %
7 EO 2C E-1 100 6 42.86
8 EO 4P S+1 450 7 50.00
9 EO 3P S-2 -100 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
N.2 Christiane Huby -Michele Berrier 48,51 %
13 EO 4P N-1 -100 10 71.43
14 EO 3S N+2 460 4 28.57
15 EO 4P E+1 -450 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
N.3 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger 52,98 %
19 EO 4C E-1 100 1 7.14
20 EO 3T S = 110 3 21.43
21 EO 3C S-3 -300 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
N.4 Alexandre Viot -Serge Alard 47,92 %
25 EO 4C S = 420 7 50.00
26 EO 4P W+2 -680 13 92.86
27 EO 4C W-1 50 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
N10 Anne Brans -Daniel Couvreur 53,27 %
28 EO 2P N+2 170 9 64.29
29 EO 2P E = -110 3 21.43
30 EO 7K S = 1440 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
N.5 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Annette Fobe 47,92 %
31 EO 3K W+1 -130 8 57.14
32 EO 3S N = 400 10 71.43
33 EO 2S N = 120 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 164,0 / 336 = 48,81 %
PAIRE e11 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Rita Swinnen
N.6 Simone Munsterhjelm -Colette Heerinckx 53,57 %
1 EO 4P E-1 50 5 35.71
2 EO 2T E-2 100 2 14.29
3 EO 4P S+2 480 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
N.1 Alan Beckman -Annie Zeimes 42,56 %
4 EO 3C N-2 -200 11 78.57
5 EO 2S N+3 210 12 85.71
6 EO 4C W-4 400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
N.7 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 49,40 %
7 EO 3C S-3 -300 13 92.86
8 EO 4C S+1 450 7 50.00
9 EO 3P S-1 -50 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
N.2 Christiane Huby -Michele Berrier 48,51 %
10 EO 4P W = -620 4 28.57
11 EO 2C W-2 100 7 50.00
12 EO 1S E-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
N.3 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger 52,98 %
16 EO 4PcN-2 -300 8 57.14
17 EO 1P W = -80 0 0.00
18 EO 3S E = -400 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
N.4 Alexandre Viot -Serge Alard 47,92 %
22 EO 4C S-1 -50 11 78.57
23 EO 3S E+1 -630 13 92.86
24 EO 4P E = -420 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 85,71 %
N.5 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Annette Fobe 47,92 %
28 EO 4PcN = 790 0 0.00
29 EO 2P E = -110 3 21.43
30 EO 6K S+1 940 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
N11 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 52,38 %
31 EO 4P S-1 -100 4 28.57
32 EO 2P S+3 200 12 85.71
33 EO 1S N+4 210 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
Total : 157,0 / 336 = 46,73 %
PAIRE e.2 Patricia Bardy -Patrizia Vaccani
N.7 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 49,40 %
1 EO 4P E-1 50 5 35.71
2 EO 2P W-1 50 7 50.00
3 EO 4P N+2 480 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
N.2 Christiane Huby -Michele Berrier 48,51 %
4 EO 3P E+1 -170 6 42.86
5 EO 3S N+2 660 1 7.14
6 EO 3P E = -140 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
N.8 Pascale Ortegat -Philippe van der Gracht 49,40 %
7 EO 2C E = -110 10 71.43
8 EO 4P S+1 450 7 50.00
9 EO 2P S+1 140 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
N.3 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger 52,98 %
10 EO 4P E = -620 4 28.57
11 EO 2C E-2 100 7 50.00
12 EO 2S E-1 50 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
N.9 Claire Derieuw -Chantal de Lichtervelde 52,08 %
13 EO 4P S-1 -100 10 71.43
14 EO 4C S+2 480 0 0.00
15 EO 4P E+2 -480 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
N.4 Alexandre Viot -Serge Alard 47,92 %
16 EO 5PcN-2 -300 8 57.14
17 EO 1P W+1 -110 5 35.71
18 EO 3S E = -400 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
N.5 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Annette Fobe 47,92 %
22 EO 5K N-1 -50 11 78.57
23 EO 4T W = -130 4 28.57
24 EO 4P W-1 50 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
N.6 Simone Munsterhjelm -Colette Heerinckx 53,57 %
28 EO 4P N = 620 3 21.43
29 EO 2P E+1 -140 10 71.43
30 EO 6K S+1 940 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 147,0 / 336 = 43,75 %
PAIRE e.6 Suzanne Klausen -Anne de Maleingreau
N.9 Claire Derieuw -Chantal de Lichtervelde 52,08 %
1 EO 4P E-2 100 2 14.29
2 EO 3P E-1 50 7 50.00
3 EO 3S S+1 430 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
N10 Anne Brans -Daniel Couvreur 53,27 %
7 EO 3T W-4 400 0 0.00
8 EO 4P S+1 450 7 50.00
9 EO 2T N+1 110 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
N11 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 52,38 %
13 EO 4P S-1 -100 10 71.43
14 EO 3S N+2 460 4 28.57
15 EO 4P E = -420 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
N.6 Simone Munsterhjelm -Colette Heerinckx 53,57 %
16 EO 5K W-1 100 2 14.29
17 EO 1P W+2 -140 12 85.71
18 EO 2S E+2 -180 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
N.1 Alan Beckman -Annie Zeimes 42,56 %
19 EO 4P W = -620 10 71.43
20 EO 3S S-2 -200 9 64.29
21 EO 1S N = 90 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
N.7 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 49,40 %
22 EO 3PcE = -730 14 100.00
23 EO 3S W-1 100 2 14.29
24 EO 4P W-1 50 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
N.2 Christiane Huby -Michele Berrier 48,51 %
25 EO 4C S = 420 7 50.00
26 EO 4P W+1 -650 9 64.29
27 EO 4C W = -420 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
N.8 Pascale Ortegat -Philippe van der Gracht 49,40 %
28 EO 3P N+1 170 9 64.29
29 EO 2P E = -110 3 21.43
30 EO 6S N+1 1020 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
Total : 145,0 / 336 = 43,15 %
PAIRE e.3 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
N.8 Pascale Ortegat -Philippe van der Gracht 49,40 %
4 EO 3P E = -140 2 14.29
5 EO 3S N+1 630 6 42.86
6 EO 2P E+1 -140 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
N.3 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger 52,98 %
7 EO 3C E-1 100 6 42.86
8 EO 3S N+1 430 14 100.00
9 EO 3P S+1 170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
N.9 Claire Derieuw -Chantal de Lichtervelde 52,08 %
10 EO 4P W = -620 4 28.57
11 EO 2P N+1 140 2 14.29
12 EO 2S E-1 50 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
N.4 Alexandre Viot -Serge Alard 47,92 %
13 EO 4P S = 620 2 14.29
14 EO 4C S+1 450 11 78.57
15 EO 4P E+2 -480 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
N10 Anne Brans -Daniel Couvreur 53,27 %
16 EO 4C E+1 -650 14 100.00
17 EO 1P W+1 -110 5 35.71
18 EO 2S E+2 -180 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
N.5 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Annette Fobe 47,92 %
19 EO 3S W-1 100 1 7.14
20 EO 3S S-3 -300 13 92.86
21 EO Pass Passe 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
N.6 Simone Munsterhjelm -Colette Heerinckx 53,57 %
25 EO 4C S = 420 7 50.00
26 EO 5CcS-2 -500 2 14.29
27 EO 4C W = -420 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
N.7 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 49,40 %
31 EO 4K W = -130 8 57.14
32 EO 3S S+2 460 2 14.29
33 EO 2S N+2 180 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 142,0 / 336 = 42,26 %
PAIRE e.1 Catherine de Moffarts -Didier Collart
N.1 Alan Beckman -Annie Zeimes 42,56 %
1 EO 3CcN-3 -500 14 100.00
2 EO 2P W+1 -140 12 85.71
3 EO 4P S = 420 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 92,86 %
N.7 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 49,40 %
4 EO 3K W+1 -130 0 0.00
5 EO 3S N+1 630 6 42.86
6 EO 3P E = -140 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
N.2 Christiane Huby -Michele Berrier 48,51 %
7 EO 3K N-3 -300 13 92.86
8 EO 4P S+1 450 7 50.00
9 EO 3P S = 140 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
N.8 Pascale Ortegat -Philippe van der Gracht 49,40 %
10 EO 5C S-2 -200 0 0.00
11 EO 1S S+2 150 0 0.00
12 EO 3S E-1 50 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 9,52 %
N.3 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger 52,98 %
13 EO 4P S-1 -100 10 71.43
14 EO 4C S+1 450 11 78.57
15 EO 4P E = -420 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
N.4 Alexandre Viot -Serge Alard 47,92 %
19 EO 3P W+1 -170 4 28.57
20 EO 2CcE-1 200 0 0.00
21 EO 3T N+1 130 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 9,52 %
N.5 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Annette Fobe 47,92 %
25 EO 4C S = 420 7 50.00
26 EO 4P W = -620 5 35.71
27 EO 4C W-1 50 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
N.6 Simone Munsterhjelm -Colette Heerinckx 53,57 %
31 EO 4K W = -130 8 57.14
32 EO 3S N+2 460 2 14.29
33 EO 2S N+3 210 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
Total : 131,0 / 336 = 38,99 %
|