B.C.O.B.
Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement
--- 1 61,98 8 Philippe van der Gracht -Yolande Davain
--- 2 57,81 5 Pascale Ortegat -Jean de Villenfagne
--- 3 57,29 2 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne
--- 4 55,21 6 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza
--- 5 53,12 9 Evelyn Joos -Annie Legrand
--- 6 52,60 1 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx
--- 7 43,75 10 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Michele Verhulst
--- 8 42,19 7 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens
--- 9 40,10 4 Catherine de Moffarts -Anne Arsac
--- 10 35,94 3 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor
PAIRE 8 Philippe van der Gracht -Yolande Davain
7 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens 42,19 %
1 EO 4PcN+1 690 0 0.00
2 EO 3P E = -140 4 50.00
3 EO 4P E = -620 6 75.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
1 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 52,60 %
4 NS 1S E = -90 6 75.00
5 NS 2P E+1 -140 4 50.00
6 NS 4C E = -620 3 37.50 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
5 Pascale Ortegat -Jean de Villenfagne 57,81 %
7 EO 3S S = 600 6 75.00
8 EO 6S N-1 -50 8 100.00
9 EO 5CcS-1 -100 4 50.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
9 Evelyn Joos -Annie Legrand 53,12 %
10 EO 1S N-2 -200 6 75.00
11 EO 5C W-2 100 8 100.00
12 EO 3S S+3 690 3 37.50 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
6 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 55,21 %
13 EO 4P W+1 -650 4 50.00
14 EO 3S W = -400 2 25.00
15 EO 4C E+1 -450 5 62.50 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
3 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 35,94 %
16 NS 6C E = -1430 3 37.50
17 NS 4P S+1 450 7 87.50
18 NS 5P N+1 680 7 87.50 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
2 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 57,29 %
19 NS 4C W-2 200 8 100.00
20 NS 3S S-1 -100 4 50.00
21 NS 4P S+2 680 4 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
10 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Michele Verhulst 43,75 %
22 EO 4CcN-3 -500 8 100.00
23 EO 3S W+1 -630 3 37.50
24 EO 4CcS-1 -100 6 75.00 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
Total : 119,0 / 192 = 61,98 %
PAIRE 5 Pascale Ortegat -Jean de Villenfagne
9 Evelyn Joos -Annie Legrand 53,12 %
1 EO 2P N+2 170 4 50.00
2 EO 3C S-1 -100 0 0.00
3 EO 4P E = -620 6 75.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
3 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 35,94 %
4 EO 2C W = -110 6 75.00
5 EO 3P W+1 -170 8 100.00
6 EO 4C E = -620 5 62.50 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
8 Philippe van der Gracht -Yolande Davain 61,98 %
7 NS 3S S = 600 2 25.00
8 NS 6S N-1 -50 0 0.00
9 NS 5CcS-1 -100 4 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
7 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens 42,19 %
10 NS 2K S = 90 8 100.00
11 NS 5P N+1 480 5 62.50
12 NS 3S N+3 690 5 62.50 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
10 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Michele Verhulst 43,75 %
13 EO 4P W+1 -650 4 50.00
14 EO 3S E+1 -430 6 75.00
15 EO 4C E+1 -450 5 62.50 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
4 Catherine de Moffarts -Anne Arsac 40,10 %
16 EO 6C E+1 -1460 8 100.00
17 EO 3P S+1 170 8 100.00
18 EO 3C E = -140 8 100.00 µ Tbl = 100,00 %
6 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 55,21 %
19 NS 4P N-1 -50 2 25.00
20 NS 3S N-1 -100 4 50.00
21 NS 4P S+2 680 4 50.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
2 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 57,29 %
22 EO 2P W+1 -140 2 25.00
23 EO 3S W+1 -630 3 37.50
24 EO 4P N-1 -50 4 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
Total : 111,0 / 192 = 57,81 %
PAIRE 2 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne
4 Catherine de Moffarts -Anne Arsac 40,10 %
1 NS 4CcW-3 500 6 75.00
2 NS 3K N-2 -200 0 0.00
3 NS 4P E-1 100 8 100.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
10 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Michele Verhulst 43,75 %
4 EO 1S E = -90 2 25.00
5 EO 3P E = -140 4 50.00
6 EO 4C E = -620 5 62.50 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
1 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 52,60 %
7 EO 3S S = 600 6 75.00
8 EO 5K N = 400 6 75.00
9 EO 4CcS = 590 1 12.50 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
3 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 35,94 %
10 NS 1S W+1 -120 4 50.00
11 NS 5P N+1 480 5 62.50
12 NS 6T N = 1370 8 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
7 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens 42,19 %
13 EO 4P W+1 -650 4 50.00
14 EO 3S E+1 -430 6 75.00
15 EO 4C W+1 -450 5 62.50 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
9 Evelyn Joos -Annie Legrand 53,12 %
16 NS 4PcS-4 -800 6 75.00
17 NS 4P S+1 450 7 87.50
18 NS 3P N+3 230 4 50.00 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
8 Philippe van der Gracht -Yolande Davain 61,98 %
19 EO 4C W-2 200 0 0.00
20 EO 3S S-1 -100 4 50.00
21 EO 4P S+2 680 4 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
5 Pascale Ortegat -Jean de Villenfagne 57,81 %
22 NS 2P W+1 -140 6 75.00
23 NS 3S W+1 -630 5 62.50
24 NS 4P N-1 -50 4 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
Total : 110,0 / 192 = 57,29 %
PAIRE 6 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza
3 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 35,94 %
1 EO 3K E-1 50 7 87.50
2 EO 3P E = -140 4 50.00
3 EO 4P E = -620 6 75.00 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
9 Evelyn Joos -Annie Legrand 53,12 %
4 EO 1S E = -90 2 25.00
5 EO 4P E-1 50 0 0.00
6 EO 4C E = -620 5 62.50 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
4 Catherine de Moffarts -Anne Arsac 40,10 %
7 EO 3S S = 600 6 75.00
8 EO 5K N+2 440 4 50.00
9 EO 5K W+1 -620 7 87.50 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
1 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 52,60 %
10 NS 1S W = -90 6 75.00
11 NS 5P N+1 480 5 62.50
12 NS 3S N+2 660 2 25.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
8 Philippe van der Gracht -Yolande Davain 61,98 %
13 NS 4P W+1 -650 4 50.00
14 NS 3S W = -400 6 75.00
15 NS 4C E+1 -450 3 37.50 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
10 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Michele Verhulst 43,75 %
16 EO 4C E+3 -710 0 0.00
17 EO 4P S = 420 4 50.00
18 EO 3P N+1 170 6 75.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
5 Pascale Ortegat -Jean de Villenfagne 57,81 %
19 EO 4P N-1 -50 6 75.00
20 EO 3S N-1 -100 4 50.00
21 EO 4P S+2 680 4 50.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
7 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens 42,19 %
22 NS 3S N-3 -150 3 37.50
23 NS 3S W+1 -630 5 62.50
24 NS 5TcW-1 100 7 87.50 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
Total : 106,0 / 192 = 55,21 %
PAIRE 9 Evelyn Joos -Annie Legrand
5 Pascale Ortegat -Jean de Villenfagne 57,81 %
1 NS 2P N+2 170 4 50.00
2 NS 3C S-1 -100 8 100.00
3 NS 4P E = -620 2 25.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
6 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 55,21 %
4 NS 1S E = -90 6 75.00
5 NS 4P E-1 50 8 100.00
6 NS 4C E = -620 3 37.50 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
7 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens 42,19 %
7 NS 3S S+1 630 6 75.00
8 NS 3S N+3 490 7 87.50
9 NS 4CcS = 590 7 87.50 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
8 Philippe van der Gracht -Yolande Davain 61,98 %
10 NS 1S N-2 -200 2 25.00
11 NS 5C W-2 100 0 0.00
12 NS 3S S+3 690 5 62.50 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
1 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 52,60 %
13 EO 4C W+1 -650 4 50.00
14 EO 3S W-1 50 0 0.00
15 EO 4C E+1 -450 5 62.50 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
2 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 57,29 %
16 EO 4PcS-4 -800 2 25.00
17 EO 4P S+1 450 1 12.50
18 EO 3P N+3 230 4 50.00 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
3 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 35,94 %
19 EO 4C W = -620 8 100.00
20 EO 2K N+3 150 0 0.00
21 EO 4P N+2 680 4 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
4 Catherine de Moffarts -Anne Arsac 40,10 %
22 EO 3S S-2 -100 0 0.00
23 EO 3S W+2 -660 8 100.00
24 EO 4T W = -130 8 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 102,0 / 192 = 53,12 %
PAIRE 1 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx
10 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Michele Verhulst 43,75 %
1 EO 4C W-1 50 7 87.50
2 EO 3P E = -140 4 50.00
3 EO 5TcS-2 -300 2 25.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
8 Philippe van der Gracht -Yolande Davain 61,98 %
4 EO 1S E = -90 2 25.00
5 EO 2P E+1 -140 4 50.00
6 EO 4C E = -620 5 62.50 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
2 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 57,29 %
7 NS 3S S = 600 2 25.00
8 NS 5K N = 400 2 25.00
9 NS 4CcS = 590 7 87.50 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
6 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 55,21 %
10 EO 1S W = -90 2 25.00
11 EO 5P N+1 480 3 37.50
12 EO 3S N+2 660 6 75.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
9 Evelyn Joos -Annie Legrand 53,12 %
13 NS 4C W+1 -650 4 50.00
14 NS 3S W-1 50 8 100.00
15 NS 4C E+1 -450 3 37.50 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
7 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens 42,19 %
16 EO 6C E = -1430 5 62.50
17 EO 3P S+2 200 6 75.00
18 EO 4P N+2 680 1 12.50 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
4 Catherine de Moffarts -Anne Arsac 40,10 %
19 NS 4C W-1 100 5 62.50
20 NS 2P S-1 -100 4 50.00
21 NS 4C N+2 680 4 50.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
3 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 35,94 %
22 NS 4C N-3 -150 3 37.50
23 NS 3S W+1 -630 5 62.50
24 NS 5TcW-1 100 7 87.50 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
Total : 101,0 / 192 = 52,60 %
PAIRE 10 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Michele Verhulst
1 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 52,60 %
1 NS 4C W-1 50 1 12.50
2 NS 3P E = -140 4 50.00
3 NS 5TcS-2 -300 6 75.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
2 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 57,29 %
4 NS 1S E = -90 6 75.00
5 NS 3P E = -140 4 50.00
6 NS 4C E = -620 3 37.50 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
3 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 35,94 %
7 NS 3S S+2 660 8 100.00
8 NS 4S N+2 490 7 87.50
9 NS 5K E+1 -620 1 12.50 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
4 Catherine de Moffarts -Anne Arsac 40,10 %
10 NS 1S N-3 -300 0 0.00
11 NS 5P S+1 480 5 62.50
12 NS 4T N+2 170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
5 Pascale Ortegat -Jean de Villenfagne 57,81 %
13 NS 4P W+1 -650 4 50.00
14 NS 3S E+1 -430 2 25.00
15 NS 4C E+1 -450 3 37.50 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
6 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 55,21 %
16 NS 4C E+3 -710 8 100.00
17 NS 4P S = 420 4 50.00
18 NS 3P N+1 170 2 25.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
7 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens 42,19 %
19 NS 3C W-1 100 5 62.50
20 NS 3P S-2 -200 0 0.00
21 NS 4P N+2 680 4 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
8 Philippe van der Gracht -Yolande Davain 61,98 %
22 NS 4CcN-3 -500 0 0.00
23 NS 3S W+1 -630 5 62.50
24 NS 4CcS-1 -100 2 25.00 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
Total : 84,0 / 192 = 43,75 %
PAIRE 7 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens
8 Philippe van der Gracht -Yolande Davain 61,98 %
1 NS 4PcN+1 690 8 100.00
2 NS 3P E = -140 4 50.00
3 NS 4P E = -620 2 25.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
4 Catherine de Moffarts -Anne Arsac 40,10 %
4 EO 1S E+1 -120 8 100.00
5 EO 2P E+1 -140 4 50.00
6 EO 3C E+2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
9 Evelyn Joos -Annie Legrand 53,12 %
7 EO 3S S+1 630 2 25.00
8 EO 3S N+3 490 1 12.50
9 EO 4CcS = 590 1 12.50 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
5 Pascale Ortegat -Jean de Villenfagne 57,81 %
10 EO 2K S = 90 0 0.00
11 EO 5P N+1 480 3 37.50
12 EO 3S N+3 690 3 37.50 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
2 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 57,29 %
13 NS 4P W+1 -650 4 50.00
14 NS 3S E+1 -430 2 25.00
15 NS 4C W+1 -450 3 37.50 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
1 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 52,60 %
16 NS 6C E = -1430 3 37.50
17 NS 3P S+2 200 2 25.00
18 NS 4P N+2 680 7 87.50 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
10 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Michele Verhulst 43,75 %
19 EO 3C W-1 100 3 37.50
20 EO 3P S-2 -200 8 100.00
21 EO 4P N+2 680 4 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
6 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 55,21 %
22 EO 3S N-3 -150 5 62.50
23 EO 3S W+1 -630 3 37.50
24 EO 5TcW-1 100 1 12.50 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
Total : 81,0 / 192 = 42,19 %
PAIRE 4 Catherine de Moffarts -Anne Arsac
2 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 57,29 %
1 EO 4CcW-3 500 2 25.00
2 EO 3K N-2 -200 8 100.00
3 EO 4P E-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
7 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens 42,19 %
4 NS 1S E+1 -120 0 0.00
5 NS 2P E+1 -140 4 50.00
6 NS 3C E+2 -200 8 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
6 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 55,21 %
7 NS 3S S = 600 2 25.00
8 NS 5K N+2 440 4 50.00
9 NS 5K W+1 -620 1 12.50 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
10 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Michele Verhulst 43,75 %
10 EO 1S N-3 -300 8 100.00
11 EO 5P S+1 480 3 37.50
12 EO 4T N+2 170 8 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
3 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 35,94 %
13 EO 4P W+1 -650 4 50.00
14 EO 3S E+1 -430 6 75.00
15 EO 2C E+2 -170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
5 Pascale Ortegat -Jean de Villenfagne 57,81 %
16 NS 6C E+1 -1460 0 0.00
17 NS 3P S+1 170 0 0.00
18 NS 3C E = -140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
1 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 52,60 %
19 EO 4C W-1 100 3 37.50
20 EO 2P S-1 -100 4 50.00
21 EO 4C N+2 680 4 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
9 Evelyn Joos -Annie Legrand 53,12 %
22 NS 3S S-2 -100 8 100.00
23 NS 3S W+2 -660 0 0.00
24 NS 4T W = -130 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 77,0 / 192 = 40,10 %
PAIRE 3 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor
6 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 55,21 %
1 NS 3K E-1 50 1 12.50
2 NS 3P E = -140 4 50.00
3 NS 4P E = -620 2 25.00 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
5 Pascale Ortegat -Jean de Villenfagne 57,81 %
4 NS 2C W = -110 2 25.00
5 NS 3P W+1 -170 0 0.00
6 NS 4C E = -620 3 37.50 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
10 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Michele Verhulst 43,75 %
7 EO 3S S+2 660 0 0.00
8 EO 4S N+2 490 1 12.50
9 EO 5K E+1 -620 7 87.50 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
2 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Nathalie de Laminne 57,29 %
10 EO 1S W+1 -120 4 50.00
11 EO 5P N+1 480 3 37.50
12 EO 6T N = 1370 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
4 Catherine de Moffarts -Anne Arsac 40,10 %
13 NS 4P W+1 -650 4 50.00
14 NS 3S E+1 -430 2 25.00
15 NS 2C E+2 -170 8 100.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
8 Philippe van der Gracht -Yolande Davain 61,98 %
16 EO 6C E = -1430 5 62.50
17 EO 4P S+1 450 1 12.50
18 EO 5P N+1 680 1 12.50 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
9 Evelyn Joos -Annie Legrand 53,12 %
19 NS 4C W = -620 0 0.00
20 NS 2K N+3 150 8 100.00
21 NS 4P N+2 680 4 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
1 Grazia Neuenschwander -Colette Heerinckx 52,60 %
22 EO 4C N-3 -150 5 62.50
23 EO 3S W+1 -630 3 37.50
24 EO 5TcW-1 100 1 12.50 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
Total : 69,0 / 192 = 35,94 %
|