B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement
--- 1 60,61 B.9 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige
--- 2 59,10 A.2 Claire Dubois -Bruno Chevalier
--- 3 58,37 B.4 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe
--- 4 57,40 A.9 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys
--- 5 55,58 A.8 Ghislain le Hardy de B. -Lydia Luyten
--- 6 54,78 B.2 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles
--- 7 53,93 A10 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger
--- 8 53,40 A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor
--- 9 53,08 B12 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm
--- 10 52,12 B10 Anne France Raquez -Nicolas de Neve
--- ~ 52,12 A14 Aida Zumot -Claire de Quirini
--- 12 52,00 A.6 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger
--- 13 51,89 B.5 Grazia Neuenschwander -Pascale Ortegat
--- 14 51,79 B11 Ines Drory -Myriam de Timary
--- 15 49,65 B.8 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Marie J. de Wagheneire
--- 16 49,39 B14 Anik Peters -Neslihan Buharali
--- 17 48,96 A12 Elie Behaghel -Anita Muuls
--- 18 48,64 A.5 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes
--- 19 48,06 B.3 Christiane Huby -Michele Berrier
--- 20 46,51 A11 Alyona Pascaru -Arielle Miller
--- 21 45,93 A13 François Regis Lamy -Christiane de le Court
--- 22 45,80 A.7 Didier Collart -Patricia Bardy
--- 23 43,72 B.1 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten
--- ~ 43,72 B.7 Benoit del Marmol -Laurence del Marmol
--- 25 43,40 B.6 Claire Derieuw -Diane Deslignes
--- 26 42,12 A.1 Claire Destin -Philippe Steyt
--- 27 39,44 B13 Olivier Paternostre -Diane Emsens
--- 28 39,36 A.3 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson
PAIRE B.9 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige
B.5 Grazia Neuenschwander -Pascale Ortegat 51,89 %
1 EO 4P N = 420 4 15.38
2 EO 1S E = -90 21 80.77
3 EO 3S N-2 -100 22 84.62 µ Tbl = 60,26 %
B.2 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 54,78 %
4 EO 3S E+1 -630 22 84.62
5 EO 4C S = 620 13 50.00
6 EO 3S W+2 -660 23 88.46 µ Tbl = 74,36 %
B.6 Claire Derieuw -Diane Deslignes 43,40 %
7 EO 3T E = -110 23 88.46
8 EO 4T S = 130 21 80.77
9 EO 4P W+1 -650 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 74,36 %
B.3 Christiane Huby -Michele Berrier 48,06 %
10 EO 5P E = -650 5 19.23
11 EO 2C W = -110 23 88.46
12 EO 2S W = -120 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 53,85 %
B10 Anne France Raquez -Nicolas de Neve 52,12 %
13 EO 3C S = 140 5 19.23
14 EO 2P S+1 140 15 57.69
15 EO 3P N+1 170 19 73.08 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
B.8 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Marie J. de Wagheneire 49,65 %
16 NS 3S S-2 -100 7 26.92
17 NS 3S E-4 200 26 100.00
18 NS 2K N+2 130 17 65.38 µ Tbl = 64,10 %
B.4 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 58,37 %
19 EO 3PcS-2 -300 13 50.00
20 EO 4C N+1 650 10 38.46
21 EO 4C N+3 710 10 38.46 µ Tbl = 42,31 %
B.1 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 43,72 %
22 EO 3S W+1 -630 11 42.31
23 EO 3S W+4 -720 25 96.15
24 EO 3P N = 140 15.2 58.46 µ Tbl = 65,64 %
Total : 378,2 / 624 = 60,61 %
PAIRE A.2 Claire Dubois -Bruno Chevalier
A10 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 53,93 %
1 NS 6P N = 980 26 100.00
2 NS 1S E-1 50 16 61.54
3 NS 3S N+1 430 17 65.38 µ Tbl = 75,64 %
A.9 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 57,40 %
4 NS 2K W+3 -150 15 57.69
5 NS 4C N-1 -100 1 3.85
6 NS 5K E = -600 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 38,46 %
A.8 Ghislain le Hardy de B. -Lydia Luyten 55,58 %
7 NS 4C S+1 650 20 76.92
8 NS 3S S+1 430 12 46.15
9 NS 4P W+2 -680 3 11.54 µ Tbl = 44,87 %
A.7 Didier Collart -Patricia Bardy 45,80 %
10 NS 6P E = -1430 2 7.69
11 NS 2C E-2 100 18 69.23
12 NS 2C S-1 -100 20 76.92 µ Tbl = 51,28 %
A14 Aida Zumot -Claire de Quirini 52,12 %
13 NS 3S N-2 -200 5 19.23
14 NS 4P S = 420 26 100.00
15 NS 3P N+2 200 13 50.00 µ Tbl = 56,41 %
A13 François Regis Lamy -Christiane de le Court 45,93 %
16 NS 2P S = 110 22 84.62
17 NS 3C W-1 50 9 34.62
18 NS 2S N+2 180 24 92.31 µ Tbl = 70,51 %
A12 Elie Behaghel -Anita Muuls 48,96 %
19 NS 3S E-1 100 23 88.46
20 NS 4P S+1 650 16 61.54
21 NS 4C N+3 710 16 61.54 µ Tbl = 70,51 %
A11 Alyona Pascaru -Arielle Miller 46,51 %
22 NS 3S E+1 -630 15 57.69
23 NS 3S W+1 -630 25 96.15
24 NS 2P N+1 140 10.8 41.54 µ Tbl = 65,13 %
Total : 368,8 / 624 = 59,10 %
PAIRE B.4 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe
B.7 Benoit del Marmol -Laurence del Marmol 43,72 %
1 NS 4P N-1 -50 9 34.62
2 NS 1S W-2 100 25 96.15
3 NS 3S N+1 430 17 65.38 µ Tbl = 65,38 %
B14 Anik Peters -Neslihan Buharali 49,39 %
4 NS 2S E+2 -180 8 30.77
5 NS 5C N = 650 23 88.46
6 NS 3S W+2 -660 3 11.54 µ Tbl = 43,59 %
B13 Olivier Paternostre -Diane Emsens 39,44 %
7 NS 4C S+2 680 26 100.00
8 NS 3T S+1 130 5 19.23
9 NS 4P W+2 -680 3 11.54 µ Tbl = 43,59 %
B12 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm 53,08 %
10 NS 4P E+1 -650 21 80.77
11 NS 1S N+2 150 24 92.31
12 NS 3S W-1 50 24 92.31 µ Tbl = 88,46 %
B11 Ines Drory -Myriam de Timary 51,79 %
13 NS 4K N = 130 17 65.38
14 NS 2P S+2 170 21 80.77
15 NS 3P N+2 200 13 50.00 µ Tbl = 65,38 %
B10 Anne France Raquez -Nicolas de Neve 52,12 %
16 NS 1S N = 90 20 76.92
17 NS 3C W-1 50 9 34.62
18 NS 2K N+1 110 10 38.46 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
B.9 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 60,61 %
19 NS 3PcS-2 -300 13 50.00
20 NS 4C N+1 650 16 61.54
21 NS 4C N+3 710 16 61.54 µ Tbl = 57,69 %
B.8 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Marie J. de Wagheneire 49,65 %
22 NS 3S E+1 -630 15 57.69
23 NS 3S W+1 -630 25 96.15
24 NS 3S S-1 -50 1.2 4.62 µ Tbl = 52,82 %
Total : 364,2 / 624 = 58,37 %
PAIRE A.9 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys
A.5 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes 48,64 %
1 EO 4K N+1 150 12 46.15
2 EO 1S E = -90 21 80.77
3 EO 3S S+3 490 1 3.85 µ Tbl = 43,59 %
A.2 Claire Dubois -Bruno Chevalier 59,10 %
4 EO 2K W+3 -150 11 42.31
5 EO 4C N-1 -100 25 96.15
6 EO 5K E = -600 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 61,54 %
A.6 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger 52,00 %
7 EO 3T E = -110 23 88.46
8 EO 3S S+2 460 8 30.77
9 EO 4P W+1 -650 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 57,69 %
A.3 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 39,36 %
10 EO 4P E+3 -710 17 65.38
11 EO 1S N-1 -50 17 65.38
12 EO 3K E+1 -130 22 84.62 µ Tbl = 71,79 %
A10 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 53,93 %
13 EO 3K N+1 130 9 34.62
14 EO 3P S = 140 15 57.69
15 EO 4P N = 620 8 30.77 µ Tbl = 41,03 %
A.8 Ghislain le Hardy de B. -Lydia Luyten 55,58 %
16 NS 2S S-1 -50 16 61.54
17 NS 3C W-2 100 19 73.08
18 NS 2K N+3 150 21 80.77 µ Tbl = 71,79 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 53,40 %
19 EO 3S E = -600 16 61.54
20 EO 6P S = 1430 0 0.00
21 EO 4C N+3 710 10 38.46 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.1 Claire Destin -Philippe Steyt 42,12 %
22 EO 3S E+2 -660 21 80.77
23 EO 3S W+4 -720 25 96.15
24 EO 2P N+1 140 15.2 58.46 µ Tbl = 78,46 %
Total : 358,2 / 624 = 57,40 %
PAIRE A.8 Ghislain le Hardy de B. -Lydia Luyten
A.1 Claire Destin -Philippe Steyt 42,12 %
1 EO 5K S+1 420 4 15.38
2 EO 1S W+1 -120 26 100.00
3 EO 3S N-2 -100 22 84.62 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.5 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes 48,64 %
4 EO 3S E+2 -660 26 100.00
5 EO 4C N = 620 13 50.00
6 EO 5K E = -600 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 65,38 %
A.2 Claire Dubois -Bruno Chevalier 59,10 %
7 EO 4C S+1 650 6 23.08
8 EO 3S S+1 430 14 53.85
9 EO 4P W+2 -680 23 88.46 µ Tbl = 55,13 %
A.6 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger 52,00 %
10 EO 4P E+2 -680 11 42.31
11 EO 1S N+1 120 6 23.08
12 EO 2S W = -120 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 39,74 %
A.3 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 39,36 %
13 EO 2P S = 110 12 46.15
14 EO 2C E+3 -200 22 84.62
15 EO 4P N+1 650 2 7.69 µ Tbl = 46,15 %
A.9 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 57,40 %
16 EO 2S S-1 -50 10 38.46
17 EO 3C W-2 100 7 26.92
18 EO 2K N+3 150 5 19.23 µ Tbl = 28,21 %
A.7 Didier Collart -Patricia Bardy 45,80 %
19 NS 3P S-2 -100 20 76.92
20 NS 4P S+2 680 21 80.77
21 NS 5C N+2 710 16 61.54 µ Tbl = 73,08 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 53,40 %
22 EO 3S W+1 -630 11 42.31
23 EO 3S W+3 -690 19 73.08
24 EO 3S S-1 -50 24.8 95.38 µ Tbl = 70,26 %
Total : 346,8 / 624 = 55,58 %
PAIRE B.2 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles
B10 Anne France Raquez -Nicolas de Neve 52,12 %
1 NS 6P N-2 -100 2 7.69
2 NS 1S E-2 100 25 96.15
3 NS 3S S+2 460 22 84.62 µ Tbl = 62,82 %
B.9 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 60,61 %
4 NS 3S E+1 -630 4 15.38
5 NS 4C S = 620 13 50.00
6 NS 3S W+2 -660 3 11.54 µ Tbl = 25,64 %
B.8 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Marie J. de Wagheneire 49,65 %
7 NS 4C N = 620 14 53.85
8 NS 3S S+2 460 18 69.23
9 NS 4P W+1 -650 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 56,41 %
B.7 Benoit del Marmol -Laurence del Marmol 43,72 %
10 NS 4P E+3 -710 9 34.62
11 NS 3K S-1 -50 9 34.62
12 NS 3S W-1 50 24 92.31 µ Tbl = 53,85 %
B14 Anik Peters -Neslihan Buharali 49,39 %
13 NS 4P N-2 -200 5 19.23
14 NS 3P S+1 170 21 80.77
15 NS 2P N+2 170 7 26.92 µ Tbl = 42,31 %
B13 Olivier Paternostre -Diane Emsens 39,44 %
16 NS 2S N+2 180 26 100.00
17 NS 4C W-2 100 19 73.08
18 NS 3S N = 600 26 100.00 µ Tbl = 91,03 %
B12 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm 53,08 %
19 NS 2S E+1 -150 16 61.54
20 NS 4P N-1 -100 1 3.85
21 NS 4C N+3 710 16 61.54 µ Tbl = 42,31 %
B11 Ines Drory -Myriam de Timary 51,79 %
22 NS 3S W = -600 22 84.62
23 NS 3S W+2 -660 17 65.38
24 NS 2P N+1 140 10.8 41.54 µ Tbl = 63,85 %
Total : 341,8 / 624 = 54,78 %
PAIRE A10 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger
A.2 Claire Dubois -Bruno Chevalier 59,10 %
1 EO 6P N = 980 0 0.00
2 EO 1S E-1 50 10 38.46
3 EO 3S N+1 430 9 34.62 µ Tbl = 24,36 %
A.6 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger 52,00 %
4 EO 3S E+1 -630 22 84.62
5 EO 4C N = 620 13 50.00
6 EO 5K E = -600 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 60,26 %
A.3 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 39,36 %
7 EO 4CcS-1 -200 26 100.00
8 EO 3T S+1 130 21 80.77
9 EO 4P W = -620 6 23.08 µ Tbl = 67,95 %
A11 Alyona Pascaru -Arielle Miller 46,51 %
10 EO 4P E+3 -710 17 65.38
11 EO 1S N+2 150 2 7.69
12 EO 2S W+1 -150 26 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,69 %
A.9 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 57,40 %
13 NS 3K N+1 130 17 65.38
14 NS 3P S = 140 11 42.31
15 NS 4P N = 620 18 69.23 µ Tbl = 58,97 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 53,40 %
16 EO 2P S+1 140 2 7.69
17 EO 2C W-1 50 17 65.38
18 EO 3S N-1 -100 23 88.46 µ Tbl = 53,85 %
A.1 Claire Destin -Philippe Steyt 42,12 %
19 EO 4PcS-4 -800 26 100.00
20 EO 3P S+3 230 19 73.08
21 EO 5C N+1 680 24 92.31 µ Tbl = 88,46 %
A.5 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes 48,64 %
22 EO 6S E-1 100 1 3.85
23 EO 3S W+2 -660 9 34.62
24 EO 2P N+2 170 5.5 21.15 µ Tbl = 19,87 %
Total : 336,5 / 624 = 53,93 %
PAIRE A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor
A.7 Didier Collart -Patricia Bardy 45,80 %
1 NS 6P N-2 -100 2 7.69
2 NS 1S E-1 50 16 61.54
3 NS 3S S+3 490 25 96.15 µ Tbl = 55,13 %
A14 Aida Zumot -Claire de Quirini 52,12 %
4 NS 3K W+2 -150 15 57.69
5 NS 4C N = 620 13 50.00
6 NS 6K E-1 100 24 92.31 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A13 François Regis Lamy -Christiane de le Court 45,93 %
7 NS 4C N+1 650 20 76.92
8 NS 3T S+1 130 5 19.23
9 NS 4P W = -620 20 76.92 µ Tbl = 57,69 %
A12 Elie Behaghel -Anita Muuls 48,96 %
10 NS 6P E-1 100 26 100.00
11 NS 2P W+1 -140 0 0.00
12 NS 2S W = -120 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 48,72 %
A11 Alyona Pascaru -Arielle Miller 46,51 %
13 NS 3S N-2 -200 5 19.23
14 NS 3P S+1 170 21 80.77
15 NS 4P N = 620 18 69.23 µ Tbl = 56,41 %
A10 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 53,93 %
16 NS 2P S+1 140 24 92.31
17 NS 2C W-1 50 9 34.62
18 NS 3S N-1 -100 3 11.54 µ Tbl = 46,15 %
A.9 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 57,40 %
19 NS 3S E = -600 10 38.46
20 NS 6P S = 1430 26 100.00
21 NS 4C N+3 710 16 61.54 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.8 Ghislain le Hardy de B. -Lydia Luyten 55,58 %
22 NS 3S W+1 -630 15 57.69
23 NS 3S W+3 -690 7 26.92
24 NS 3S S-1 -50 1.2 4.62 µ Tbl = 29,74 %
Total : 333,2 / 624 = 53,40 %
PAIRE B12 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm
B.3 Christiane Huby -Michele Berrier 48,06 %
1 EO 3S S-1 -50 17 65.38
2 EO 1S E-1 50 10 38.46
3 EO 3S N-3 -150 26 100.00 µ Tbl = 67,95 %
B13 Olivier Paternostre -Diane Emsens 39,44 %
4 EO 3K W+1 -130 3 11.54
5 EO 4C N+1 650 3 11.54
6 EO 3S E+1 -630 20 76.92 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
B11 Ines Drory -Myriam de Timary 51,79 %
7 NS 3C S-1 -100 6 23.08
8 NS 4T S = 130 5 19.23
9 NS 4P W+1 -650 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 29,49 %
B.4 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 58,37 %
10 EO 4P E+1 -650 5 19.23
11 EO 1S N+2 150 2 7.69
12 EO 3S W-1 50 2 7.69 µ Tbl = 11,54 %
B.1 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 43,72 %
13 EO 4P S-2 -200 21 80.77
14 EO 4P W = -420 24 92.31
15 EO 3C W-3 150 24 92.31 µ Tbl = 88,46 %
B.5 Grazia Neuenschwander -Pascale Ortegat 51,89 %
16 EO 3S S-2 -100 19 73.08
17 EO 2C W+1 -140 26 100.00
18 EO 2K N+1 110 16 61.54 µ Tbl = 78,21 %
B.2 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 54,78 %
19 EO 2S E+1 -150 10 38.46
20 EO 4P N-1 -100 25 96.15
21 EO 4C N+3 710 10 38.46 µ Tbl = 57,69 %
B.6 Claire Derieuw -Diane Deslignes 43,40 %
22 EO 3S W+1 -630 11 42.31
23 EO 3S W+3 -690 19 73.08
24 EO 2P N+1 140 15.2 58.46 µ Tbl = 57,95 %
Total : 331,2 / 624 = 53,08 %
PAIRE B10 Anne France Raquez -Nicolas de Neve
B.2 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 54,78 %
1 EO 6P N-2 -100 24 92.31
2 EO 1S E-2 100 1 3.85
3 EO 3S S+2 460 4 15.38 µ Tbl = 37,18 %
B.6 Claire Derieuw -Diane Deslignes 43,40 %
4 EO 3S E-1 100 0 0.00
5 EO 4C N-1 -100 25 96.15
6 EO 6K E-1 100 2 7.69 µ Tbl = 34,62 %
B.3 Christiane Huby -Michele Berrier 48,06 %
7 EO 5K E-2 200 16 61.54
8 EO 3S N+2 460 8 30.77
9 EO 4P W+2 -680 23 88.46 µ Tbl = 60,26 %
B11 Ines Drory -Myriam de Timary 51,79 %
10 EO 4P E+3 -710 17 65.38
11 EO 2C E = -110 23 88.46
12 EO 3K E+1 -130 22 84.62 µ Tbl = 79,49 %
B.9 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 60,61 %
13 NS 3C S = 140 21 80.77
14 NS 2P S+1 140 11 42.31
15 NS 3P N+1 170 7 26.92 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
B.4 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 58,37 %
16 EO 1S N = 90 6 23.08
17 EO 3C W-1 50 17 65.38
18 EO 2K N+1 110 16 61.54 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
B.1 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 43,72 %
19 EO 4C W-1 100 3 11.54
20 EO 4P S+1 650 10 38.46
21 EO 3S N+3 690 22 84.62 µ Tbl = 44,87 %
B.5 Grazia Neuenschwander -Pascale Ortegat 51,89 %
22 EO 3S W+3 -690 26 100.00
23 EO 3S W+3 -690 19 73.08
24 EO 3S S = 400 2.2 8.46 µ Tbl = 60,51 %
Total : 325,2 / 624 = 52,12 %
PAIRE A14 Aida Zumot -Claire de Quirini
A13 François Regis Lamy -Christiane de le Court 45,93 %
1 NS 5K N = 400 18 69.23
2 NS 1S E-1 50 16 61.54
3 NS 3S N+1 430 17 65.38 µ Tbl = 65,38 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 53,40 %
4 EO 3K W+2 -150 11 42.31
5 EO 4C N = 620 13 50.00
6 EO 6K E-1 100 2 7.69 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.1 Claire Destin -Philippe Steyt 42,12 %
7 EO 4C N+1 650 6 23.08
8 EO 3T S+1 130 21 80.77
9 EO 4P W = -620 6 23.08 µ Tbl = 42,31 %
A.5 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes 48,64 %
10 EO 4P E+2 -680 11 42.31
11 EO 2C W-1 50 12 46.15
12 EO 3K E = -110 8 30.77 µ Tbl = 39,74 %
A.2 Claire Dubois -Bruno Chevalier 59,10 %
13 EO 3S N-2 -200 21 80.77
14 EO 4P S = 420 0 0.00
15 EO 3P N+2 200 13 50.00 µ Tbl = 43,59 %
A.6 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger 52,00 %
16 EO 2P S-1 -50 10 38.46
17 EO 4C W-2 100 7 26.92
18 EO 3S N-1 -100 23 88.46 µ Tbl = 51,28 %
A.3 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 39,36 %
19 EO 3S E+1 -630 20 76.92
20 EO 2P S+4 230 19 73.08
21 EO 4C N = 620 26 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
A.7 Didier Collart -Patricia Bardy 45,80 %
22 EO 3S E+2 -660 21 80.77
23 EO 3S W+2 -660 9 34.62
24 EO 2P N+1 140 15.2 58.46 µ Tbl = 57,95 %
Total : 325,2 / 624 = 52,12 %
PAIRE A.6 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger
A11 Alyona Pascaru -Arielle Miller 46,51 %
1 NS 3S N-1 -50 9 34.62
2 NS 1S E-1 50 16 61.54
3 NS 3S N+1 430 17 65.38 µ Tbl = 53,85 %
A10 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 53,93 %
4 NS 3S E+1 -630 4 15.38
5 NS 4C N = 620 13 50.00
6 NS 5K E = -600 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 39,74 %
A.9 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 57,40 %
7 NS 3T E = -110 3 11.54
8 NS 3S S+2 460 18 69.23
9 NS 4P W+1 -650 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 42,31 %
A.8 Ghislain le Hardy de B. -Lydia Luyten 55,58 %
10 NS 4P E+2 -680 15 57.69
11 NS 1S N+1 120 20 76.92
12 NS 2S W = -120 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 60,26 %
A.7 Didier Collart -Patricia Bardy 45,80 %
13 NS 1S N+2 150 24 92.31
14 NS 2P S+1 140 11 42.31
15 NS 3P N = 140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 44,87 %
A14 Aida Zumot -Claire de Quirini 52,12 %
16 NS 2P S-1 -50 16 61.54
17 NS 4C W-2 100 19 73.08
18 NS 3S N-1 -100 3 11.54 µ Tbl = 48,72 %
A13 François Regis Lamy -Christiane de le Court 45,93 %
19 NS 4CcW-1 200 26 100.00
20 NS 2P S+1 140 4 15.38
21 NS 4C N+3 710 16 61.54 µ Tbl = 58,97 %
A12 Elie Behaghel -Anita Muuls 48,96 %
22 NS 3S W+1 -630 15 57.69
23 NS 3S W+2 -660 17 65.38
24 NS 3C S+1 170 20.5 78.85 µ Tbl = 67,31 %
Total : 324,5 / 624 = 52,00 %
PAIRE B.5 Grazia Neuenschwander -Pascale Ortegat
B.9 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 60,61 %
1 NS 4P N = 420 22 84.62
2 NS 1S E = -90 5 19.23
3 NS 3S N-2 -100 4 15.38 µ Tbl = 39,74 %
B.8 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Marie J. de Wagheneire 49,65 %
4 NS 3K W+2 -150 15 57.69
5 NS 4C N = 620 13 50.00
6 NS 5K E = -600 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 53,85 %
B.7 Benoit del Marmol -Laurence del Marmol 43,72 %
7 NS 4C N+1 650 20 76.92
8 NS 3S S+3 490 24 92.31
9 NS 4P W-1 100 25 96.15 µ Tbl = 88,46 %
B14 Anik Peters -Neslihan Buharali 49,39 %
10 NS 6P E = -1430 2 7.69
11 NS 3K N-1 -50 9 34.62
12 NS 2S W = -120 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 29,49 %
B13 Olivier Paternostre -Diane Emsens 39,44 %
13 NS 3S N = 600 26 100.00
14 NS 3P S+1 170 21 80.77
15 NS 4P N+1 650 24 92.31 µ Tbl = 91,03 %
B12 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm 53,08 %
16 NS 3S S-2 -100 7 26.92
17 NS 2C W+1 -140 0 0.00
18 NS 2K N+1 110 10 38.46 µ Tbl = 21,79 %
B11 Ines Drory -Myriam de Timary 51,79 %
19 NS 3PcS-2 -300 13 50.00
20 NS 4P S = 620 11 42.31
21 NS 4C N+3 710 16 61.54 µ Tbl = 51,28 %
B10 Anne France Raquez -Nicolas de Neve 52,12 %
22 NS 3S W+3 -690 0 0.00
23 NS 3S W+3 -690 7 26.92
24 NS 3S S = 400 23.8 91.54 µ Tbl = 39,49 %
Total : 323,8 / 624 = 51,89 %
PAIRE B11 Ines Drory -Myriam de Timary
B.6 Claire Derieuw -Diane Deslignes 43,40 %
1 EO 6P N-2 -100 24 92.31
2 EO 1S W = -90 21 80.77
3 EO 3S N-2 -100 22 84.62 µ Tbl = 85,90 %
B.3 Christiane Huby -Michele Berrier 48,06 %
4 EO 2K W+3 -150 11 42.31
5 EO 4C S = 620 13 50.00
6 EO 6K E-1 100 2 7.69 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
B12 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm 53,08 %
7 EO 3C S-1 -100 20 76.92
8 EO 4T S = 130 21 80.77
9 EO 4P W+1 -650 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 70,51 %
B10 Anne France Raquez -Nicolas de Neve 52,12 %
10 NS 4P E+3 -710 9 34.62
11 NS 2C E = -110 3 11.54
12 NS 3K E+1 -130 4 15.38 µ Tbl = 20,51 %
B.4 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 58,37 %
13 EO 4K N = 130 9 34.62
14 EO 2P S+2 170 5 19.23
15 EO 3P N+2 200 13 50.00 µ Tbl = 34,62 %
B.1 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 43,72 %
16 EO 3K S-3 -150 26 100.00
17 EO 3C W-1 50 17 65.38
18 EO 2S N-1 -100 23 88.46 µ Tbl = 84,62 %
B.5 Grazia Neuenschwander -Pascale Ortegat 51,89 %
19 EO 3PcS-2 -300 13 50.00
20 EO 4P S = 620 15 57.69
21 EO 4C N+3 710 10 38.46 µ Tbl = 48,72 %
B.2 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 54,78 %
22 EO 3S W = -600 4 15.38
23 EO 3S W+2 -660 9 34.62
24 EO 2P N+1 140 15.2 58.46 µ Tbl = 36,15 %
Total : 323,2 / 624 = 51,79 %
PAIRE B.8 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Marie J. de Wagheneire
B.1 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 43,72 %
1 EO 3K S+3 170 10 38.46
2 EO 1S E-1 50 10 38.46
3 EO 3K S+3 170 18 69.23 µ Tbl = 48,72 %
B.5 Grazia Neuenschwander -Pascale Ortegat 51,89 %
4 EO 3K W+2 -150 11 42.31
5 EO 4C N = 620 13 50.00
6 EO 5K E = -600 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 46,15 %
B.2 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 54,78 %
7 EO 4C N = 620 12 46.15
8 EO 3S S+2 460 8 30.77
9 EO 4P W+1 -650 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 43,59 %
B.6 Claire Derieuw -Diane Deslignes 43,40 %
10 EO 4P E+1 -650 5 19.23
11 EO 3K S-1 -50 17 65.38
12 EO 2S W = -120 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 46,15 %
B.3 Christiane Huby -Michele Berrier 48,06 %
13 EO 5K N-2 -200 21 80.77
14 EO 4C E+1 -450 26 100.00
15 EO 4P N = 620 8 30.77 µ Tbl = 70,51 %
B.9 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 60,61 %
16 EO 3S S-2 -100 19 73.08
17 EO 3S E-4 200 0 0.00
18 EO 2K N+2 130 9 34.62 µ Tbl = 35,90 %
B.7 Benoit del Marmol -Laurence del Marmol 43,72 %
19 NS 3S E+1 -630 6 23.08
20 NS 4P S+3 710 24 92.31
21 NS 4C N+3 710 16 61.54 µ Tbl = 58,97 %
B.4 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 58,37 %
22 EO 3S E+1 -630 11 42.31
23 EO 3S W+1 -630 1 3.85
24 EO 3S S-1 -50 24.8 95.38 µ Tbl = 47,18 %
Total : 309,8 / 624 = 49,65 %
PAIRE B14 Anik Peters -Neslihan Buharali
B13 Olivier Paternostre -Diane Emsens 39,44 %
1 NS 4P N = 420 22 84.62
2 NS 1S E-1 50 16 61.54
3 NS 2S N+3 210 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 64,10 %
B.4 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 58,37 %
4 EO 2S E+2 -180 18 69.23
5 EO 5C N = 650 3 11.54
6 EO 3S W+2 -660 23 88.46 µ Tbl = 56,41 %
B.1 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 43,72 %
7 EO 4C N+1 650 6 23.08
8 EO 3S S+4 520 0 0.00
9 EO 4P W-1 100 1 3.85 µ Tbl = 8,97 %
B.5 Grazia Neuenschwander -Pascale Ortegat 51,89 %
10 EO 6P E = -1430 24 92.31
11 EO 3K N-1 -50 17 65.38
12 EO 2S W = -120 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 70,51 %
B.2 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 54,78 %
13 EO 4P N-2 -200 21 80.77
14 EO 3P S+1 170 5 19.23
15 EO 2P N+2 170 19 73.08 µ Tbl = 57,69 %
B.6 Claire Derieuw -Diane Deslignes 43,40 %
16 EO 3S S-2 -100 19 73.08
17 EO 3C W-2 100 7 26.92
18 EO 3S N-1 -100 23 88.46 µ Tbl = 62,82 %
B.3 Christiane Huby -Michele Berrier 48,06 %
19 EO 2C W+1 -140 8 30.77
20 EO 4P S+2 680 5 19.23
21 EO 4C N+3 710 10 38.46 µ Tbl = 29,49 %
B.7 Benoit del Marmol -Laurence del Marmol 43,72 %
22 EO 3S W-1 100 1 3.85
23 EO 3S W+3 -690 19 73.08
24 EO 3P N = 140 15.2 58.46 µ Tbl = 45,13 %
Total : 308,2 / 624 = 49,39 %
PAIRE A12 Elie Behaghel -Anita Muuls
A.3 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 39,36 %
1 EO 3S S-1 -50 17 65.38
2 EO 1S E = -90 21 80.77
3 EO 3K S+4 190 16 61.54 µ Tbl = 69,23 %
A13 François Regis Lamy -Christiane de le Court 45,93 %
4 EO 4K W+1 -150 11 42.31
5 EO 3C N = 140 20 76.92
6 EO 5K E = -600 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 55,13 %
A11 Alyona Pascaru -Arielle Miller 46,51 %
7 NS 3C N+1 170 8 30.77
8 NS 3S S+2 460 18 69.23
9 NS 4P W+2 -680 3 11.54 µ Tbl = 37,18 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 53,40 %
10 EO 6P E-1 100 0 0.00
11 EO 2P W+1 -140 26 100.00
12 EO 2S W = -120 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 51,28 %
A.1 Claire Destin -Philippe Steyt 42,12 %
13 EO 3S N-1 -100 14 53.85
14 EO 2P S+1 140 15 57.69
15 EO 3P N+1 170 19 73.08 µ Tbl = 61,54 %
A.5 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes 48,64 %
16 EO 2P S-1 -50 10 38.46
17 EO 3C W-1 50 17 65.38
18 EO 2K N+1 110 16 61.54 µ Tbl = 55,13 %
A.2 Claire Dubois -Bruno Chevalier 59,10 %
19 EO 3S E-1 100 3 11.54
20 EO 4P S+1 650 10 38.46
21 EO 4C N+3 710 10 38.46 µ Tbl = 29,49 %
A.6 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger 52,00 %
22 EO 3S W+1 -630 11 42.31
23 EO 3S W+2 -660 9 34.62
24 EO 3C S+1 170 5.5 21.15 µ Tbl = 32,69 %
Total : 305,5 / 624 = 48,96 %
PAIRE A.5 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes
A.9 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 57,40 %
1 NS 4K N+1 150 14 53.85
2 NS 1S E = -90 5 19.23
3 NS 3S S+3 490 25 96.15 µ Tbl = 56,41 %
A.8 Ghislain le Hardy de B. -Lydia Luyten 55,58 %
4 NS 3S E+2 -660 0 0.00
5 NS 4C N = 620 13 50.00
6 NS 5K E = -600 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 34,62 %
A.7 Didier Collart -Patricia Bardy 45,80 %
7 NS 3C N+3 230 12 46.15
8 NS 3S S+2 460 18 69.23
9 NS 4P W+1 -650 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 53,85 %
A14 Aida Zumot -Claire de Quirini 52,12 %
10 NS 4P E+2 -680 15 57.69
11 NS 2C W-1 50 14 53.85
12 NS 3K E = -110 18 69.23 µ Tbl = 60,26 %
A13 François Regis Lamy -Christiane de le Court 45,93 %
13 NS 3S N-2 -200 5 19.23
14 NS 2P S+1 140 11 42.31
15 NS 3P N+1 170 7 26.92 µ Tbl = 29,49 %
A12 Elie Behaghel -Anita Muuls 48,96 %
16 NS 2P S-1 -50 16 61.54
17 NS 3C W-1 50 9 34.62
18 NS 2K N+1 110 10 38.46 µ Tbl = 44,87 %
A11 Alyona Pascaru -Arielle Miller 46,51 %
19 NS 3S E+1 -630 6 23.08
20 NS 3S N-1 -100 1 3.85
21 NS 4C N+3 710 16 61.54 µ Tbl = 29,49 %
A10 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 53,93 %
22 NS 6S E-1 100 25 96.15
23 NS 3S W+2 -660 17 65.38
24 NS 2P N+2 170 20.5 78.85 µ Tbl = 80,13 %
Total : 303,5 / 624 = 48,64 %
PAIRE B.3 Christiane Huby -Michele Berrier
B12 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm 53,08 %
1 NS 3S S-1 -50 9 34.62
2 NS 1S E-1 50 16 61.54
3 NS 3S N-3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 32,05 %
B11 Ines Drory -Myriam de Timary 51,79 %
4 NS 2K W+3 -150 15 57.69
5 NS 4C S = 620 13 50.00
6 NS 6K E-1 100 24 92.31 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
B10 Anne France Raquez -Nicolas de Neve 52,12 %
7 NS 5K E-2 200 10 38.46
8 NS 3S N+2 460 18 69.23
9 NS 4P W+2 -680 3 11.54 µ Tbl = 39,74 %
B.9 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 60,61 %
10 NS 5P E = -650 21 80.77
11 NS 2C W = -110 3 11.54
12 NS 2S W = -120 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 46,15 %
B.8 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Marie J. de Wagheneire 49,65 %
13 NS 5K N-2 -200 5 19.23
14 NS 4C E+1 -450 0 0.00
15 NS 4P N = 620 18 69.23 µ Tbl = 29,49 %
B.7 Benoit del Marmol -Laurence del Marmol 43,72 %
16 NS 2T N-2 -100 7 26.92
17 NS 2C W = -110 2 7.69
18 NS 2K N+3 150 21 80.77 µ Tbl = 38,46 %
B14 Anik Peters -Neslihan Buharali 49,39 %
19 NS 2C W+1 -140 18 69.23
20 NS 4P S+2 680 21 80.77
21 NS 4C N+3 710 16 61.54 µ Tbl = 70,51 %
B13 Olivier Paternostre -Diane Emsens 39,44 %
22 NS 3S W+2 -660 5 19.23
23 NS 3S W+2 -660 17 65.38
24 NS 3S S+1 430 25.9 99.62 µ Tbl = 61,41 %
Total : 299,9 / 624 = 48,06 %
PAIRE A11 Alyona Pascaru -Arielle Miller
A.6 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger 52,00 %
1 EO 3S N-1 -50 17 65.38
2 EO 1S E-1 50 10 38.46
3 EO 3S N+1 430 9 34.62 µ Tbl = 46,15 %
A.3 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 39,36 %
4 EO 2K W+3 -150 11 42.31
5 EO 4C N+1 650 3 11.54
6 EO 3S E = -600 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A12 Elie Behaghel -Anita Muuls 48,96 %
7 EO 3C N+1 170 18 69.23
8 EO 3S S+2 460 8 30.77
9 EO 4P W+2 -680 23 88.46 µ Tbl = 62,82 %
A10 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 53,93 %
10 NS 4P E+3 -710 9 34.62
11 NS 1S N+2 150 24 92.31
12 NS 2S W+1 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,31 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 53,40 %
13 EO 3S N-2 -200 21 80.77
14 EO 3P S+1 170 5 19.23
15 EO 4P N = 620 8 30.77 µ Tbl = 43,59 %
A.1 Claire Destin -Philippe Steyt 42,12 %
16 EO 2T N-2 -100 19 73.08
17 EO 4C W-3 150 2 7.69
18 EO 2K N+2 130 9 34.62 µ Tbl = 38,46 %
A.5 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes 48,64 %
19 EO 3S E+1 -630 20 76.92
20 EO 3S N-1 -100 25 96.15
21 EO 4C N+3 710 10 38.46 µ Tbl = 70,51 %
A.2 Claire Dubois -Bruno Chevalier 59,10 %
22 EO 3S E+1 -630 11 42.31
23 EO 3S W+1 -630 1 3.85
24 EO 2P N+1 140 15.2 58.46 µ Tbl = 34,87 %
Total : 290,2 / 624 = 46,51 %
PAIRE A13 François Regis Lamy -Christiane de le Court
A14 Aida Zumot -Claire de Quirini 52,12 %
1 EO 5K N = 400 8 30.77
2 EO 1S E-1 50 10 38.46
3 EO 3S N+1 430 9 34.62 µ Tbl = 34,62 %
A12 Elie Behaghel -Anita Muuls 48,96 %
4 NS 4K W+1 -150 15 57.69
5 NS 3C N = 140 6 23.08
6 NS 5K E = -600 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 44,87 %
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 53,40 %
7 EO 4C N+1 650 6 23.08
8 EO 3T S+1 130 21 80.77
9 EO 4P W = -620 6 23.08 µ Tbl = 42,31 %
A.1 Claire Destin -Philippe Steyt 42,12 %
10 EO 6P E = -1430 24 92.31
11 EO 1S N = 90 10 38.46
12 EO 3K E-1 50 2 7.69 µ Tbl = 46,15 %
A.5 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes 48,64 %
13 EO 3S N-2 -200 21 80.77
14 EO 2P S+1 140 15 57.69
15 EO 3P N+1 170 19 73.08 µ Tbl = 70,51 %
A.2 Claire Dubois -Bruno Chevalier 59,10 %
16 EO 2P S = 110 4 15.38
17 EO 3C W-1 50 17 65.38
18 EO 2S N+2 180 2 7.69 µ Tbl = 29,49 %
A.6 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger 52,00 %
19 EO 4CcW-1 200 0 0.00
20 EO 2P S+1 140 22 84.62
21 EO 4C N+3 710 10 38.46 µ Tbl = 41,03 %
A.3 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 39,36 %
22 EO 3S W+2 -660 21 80.77
23 EO 3S W+2 -660 9 34.62
24 EO 60%60% Ajust 15.6 60.00 µ Tbl = 58,46 %
Total : 286,6 / 624 = 45,93 %
PAIRE A.7 Didier Collart -Patricia Bardy
A.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 53,40 %
1 EO 6P N-2 -100 24 92.31
2 EO 1S E-1 50 10 38.46
3 EO 3S S+3 490 1 3.85 µ Tbl = 44,87 %
A.1 Claire Destin -Philippe Steyt 42,12 %
4 EO 3K W+1 -130 3 11.54
5 EO 4C N+1 650 3 11.54
6 EO 3S W+3 -690 26 100.00 µ Tbl = 41,03 %
A.5 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes 48,64 %
7 EO 3C N+3 230 14 53.85
8 EO 3S S+2 460 8 30.77
9 EO 4P W+1 -650 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 46,15 %
A.2 Claire Dubois -Bruno Chevalier 59,10 %
10 EO 6P E = -1430 24 92.31
11 EO 2C E-2 100 8 30.77
12 EO 2C S-1 -100 6 23.08 µ Tbl = 48,72 %
A.6 Mado Miller -Hélène Lemberger 52,00 %
13 EO 1S N+2 150 2 7.69
14 EO 2P S+1 140 15 57.69
15 EO 3P N = 140 26 100.00 µ Tbl = 55,13 %
A.3 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 39,36 %
16 EO 2P S-2 -100 19 73.08
17 EO 3S E-1 50 17 65.38
18 EO 2S N = 120 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 61,54 %
A.8 Ghislain le Hardy de B. -Lydia Luyten 55,58 %
19 EO 3P S-2 -100 6 23.08
20 EO 4P S+2 680 5 19.23
21 EO 5C N+2 710 10 38.46 µ Tbl = 26,92 %
A14 Aida Zumot -Claire de Quirini 52,12 %
22 NS 3S E+2 -660 5 19.23
23 NS 3S W+2 -660 17 65.38
24 NS 2P N+1 140 10.8 41.54 µ Tbl = 42,05 %
Total : 285,8 / 624 = 45,80 %
PAIRE B.1 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten
B.8 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Marie J. de Wagheneire 49,65 %
1 NS 3K S+3 170 16 61.54
2 NS 1S E-1 50 16 61.54
3 NS 3K S+3 170 8 30.77 µ Tbl = 51,28 %
B.7 Benoit del Marmol -Laurence del Marmol 43,72 %
4 NS 3S E+1 -630 4 15.38
5 NS 3P W-1 50 4 15.38
6 NS 5K E = -600 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 28,21 %
B14 Anik Peters -Neslihan Buharali 49,39 %
7 NS 4C N+1 650 20 76.92
8 NS 3S S+4 520 26 100.00
9 NS 4P W-1 100 25 96.15 µ Tbl = 91,03 %
B13 Olivier Paternostre -Diane Emsens 39,44 %
10 NS 4P E+1 -650 21 80.77
11 NS 2T W-3 150 24 92.31
12 NS 3K E+1 -130 4 15.38 µ Tbl = 62,82 %
B12 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm 53,08 %
13 NS 4P S-2 -200 5 19.23
14 NS 4P W = -420 2 7.69
15 NS 3C W-3 150 2 7.69 µ Tbl = 11,54 %
B11 Ines Drory -Myriam de Timary 51,79 %
16 NS 3K S-3 -150 0 0.00
17 NS 3C W-1 50 9 34.62
18 NS 2S N-1 -100 3 11.54 µ Tbl = 15,38 %
B10 Anne France Raquez -Nicolas de Neve 52,12 %
19 NS 4C W-1 100 23 88.46
20 NS 4P S+1 650 16 61.54
21 NS 3S N+3 690 4 15.38 µ Tbl = 55,13 %
B.9 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 60,61 %
22 NS 3S W+1 -630 15 57.69
23 NS 3S W+4 -720 1 3.85
24 NS 3P N = 140 10.8 41.54 µ Tbl = 34,36 %
Total : 272,8 / 624 = 43,72 %
PAIRE B.7 Benoit del Marmol -Laurence del Marmol
B.4 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 58,37 %
1 EO 4P N-1 -50 17 65.38
2 EO 1S W-2 100 1 3.85
3 EO 3S N+1 430 9 34.62 µ Tbl = 34,62 %
B.1 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 43,72 %
4 EO 3S E+1 -630 22 84.62
5 EO 3P W-1 50 22 84.62
6 EO 5K E = -600 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 71,79 %
B.5 Grazia Neuenschwander -Pascale Ortegat 51,89 %
7 EO 4C N+1 650 6 23.08
8 EO 3S S+3 490 2 7.69
9 EO 4P W-1 100 1 3.85 µ Tbl = 11,54 %
B.2 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 54,78 %
10 EO 4P E+3 -710 17 65.38
11 EO 3K S-1 -50 17 65.38
12 EO 3S W-1 50 2 7.69 µ Tbl = 46,15 %
B.6 Claire Derieuw -Diane Deslignes 43,40 %
13 EO 2C S+1 140 5 19.23
14 EO 3P S = 140 15 57.69
15 EO 5P N = 650 2 7.69 µ Tbl = 28,21 %
B.3 Christiane Huby -Michele Berrier 48,06 %
16 EO 2T N-2 -100 19 73.08
17 EO 2C W = -110 24 92.31
18 EO 2K N+3 150 5 19.23 µ Tbl = 61,54 %
B.8 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Marie J. de Wagheneire 49,65 %
19 EO 3S E+1 -630 20 76.92
20 EO 4P S+3 710 2 7.69
21 EO 4C N+3 710 10 38.46 µ Tbl = 41,03 %
B14 Anik Peters -Neslihan Buharali 49,39 %
22 NS 3S W-1 100 25 96.15
23 NS 3S W+3 -690 7 26.92
24 NS 3P N = 140 10.8 41.54 µ Tbl = 54,87 %
Total : 272,8 / 624 = 43,72 %
PAIRE B.6 Claire Derieuw -Diane Deslignes
B11 Ines Drory -Myriam de Timary 51,79 %
1 NS 6P N-2 -100 2 7.69
2 NS 1S W = -90 5 19.23
3 NS 3S N-2 -100 4 15.38 µ Tbl = 14,10 %
B10 Anne France Raquez -Nicolas de Neve 52,12 %
4 NS 3S E-1 100 26 100.00
5 NS 4C N-1 -100 1 3.85
6 NS 6K E-1 100 24 92.31 µ Tbl = 65,38 %
B.9 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 60,61 %
7 NS 3T E = -110 3 11.54
8 NS 4T S = 130 5 19.23
9 NS 4P W+1 -650 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 25,64 %
B.8 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Marie J. de Wagheneire 49,65 %
10 NS 4P E+1 -650 21 80.77
11 NS 3K S-1 -50 9 34.62
12 NS 2S W = -120 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 53,85 %
B.7 Benoit del Marmol -Laurence del Marmol 43,72 %
13 NS 2C S+1 140 21 80.77
14 NS 3P S = 140 11 42.31
15 NS 5P N = 650 24 92.31 µ Tbl = 71,79 %
B14 Anik Peters -Neslihan Buharali 49,39 %
16 NS 3S S-2 -100 7 26.92
17 NS 3C W-2 100 19 73.08
18 NS 3S N-1 -100 3 11.54 µ Tbl = 37,18 %
B13 Olivier Paternostre -Diane Emsens 39,44 %
19 NS 3S E+2 -660 2 7.69
20 NS 4P S = 620 11 42.31
21 NS 5C N+2 710 16 61.54 µ Tbl = 37,18 %
B12 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm 53,08 %
22 NS 3S W+1 -630 15 57.69
23 NS 3S W+3 -690 7 26.92
24 NS 2P N+1 140 10.8 41.54 µ Tbl = 42,05 %
Total : 270,8 / 624 = 43,40 %
PAIRE A.1 Claire Destin -Philippe Steyt
A.8 Ghislain le Hardy de B. -Lydia Luyten 55,58 %
1 NS 5K S+1 420 22 84.62
2 NS 1S W+1 -120 0 0.00
3 NS 3S N-2 -100 4 15.38 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.7 Didier Collart -Patricia Bardy 45,80 %
4 NS 3K W+1 -130 23 88.46
5 NS 4C N+1 650 23 88.46
6 NS 3S W+3 -690 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 58,97 %
A14 Aida Zumot -Claire de Quirini 52,12 %
7 NS 4C N+1 650 20 76.92
8 NS 3T S+1 130 5 19.23
9 NS 4P W = -620 20 76.92 µ Tbl = 57,69 %
A13 François Regis Lamy -Christiane de le Court 45,93 %
10 NS 6P E = -1430 2 7.69
11 NS 1S N = 90 16 61.54
12 NS 3K E-1 50 24 92.31 µ Tbl = 53,85 %
A12 Elie Behaghel -Anita Muuls 48,96 %
13 NS 3S N-1 -100 12 46.15
14 NS 2P S+1 140 11 42.31
15 NS 3P N+1 170 7 26.92 µ Tbl = 38,46 %
A11 Alyona Pascaru -Arielle Miller 46,51 %
16 NS 2T N-2 -100 7 26.92
17 NS 4C W-3 150 24 92.31
18 NS 2K N+2 130 17 65.38 µ Tbl = 61,54 %
A10 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 53,93 %
19 NS 4PcS-4 -800 0 0.00
20 NS 3P S+3 230 7 26.92
21 NS 5C N+1 680 2 7.69 µ Tbl = 11,54 %
A.9 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 57,40 %
22 NS 3S E+2 -660 5 19.23
23 NS 3S W+4 -720 1 3.85
24 NS 2P N+1 140 10.8 41.54 µ Tbl = 21,54 %
Total : 262,8 / 624 = 42,12 %
PAIRE B13 Olivier Paternostre -Diane Emsens
B14 Anik Peters -Neslihan Buharali 49,39 %
1 EO 4P N = 420 4 15.38
2 EO 1S E-1 50 10 38.46
3 EO 2S N+3 210 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 35,90 %
B12 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm 53,08 %
4 NS 3K W+1 -130 23 88.46
5 NS 4C N+1 650 23 88.46
6 NS 3S E+1 -630 6 23.08 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
B.4 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 58,37 %
7 EO 4C S+2 680 0 0.00
8 EO 3T S+1 130 21 80.77
9 EO 4P W+2 -680 23 88.46 µ Tbl = 56,41 %
B.1 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 43,72 %
10 EO 4P E+1 -650 5 19.23
11 EO 2T W-3 150 2 7.69
12 EO 3K E+1 -130 22 84.62 µ Tbl = 37,18 %
B.5 Grazia Neuenschwander -Pascale Ortegat 51,89 %
13 EO 3S N = 600 0 0.00
14 EO 3P S+1 170 5 19.23
15 EO 4P N+1 650 2 7.69 µ Tbl = 8,97 %
B.2 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 54,78 %
16 EO 2S N+2 180 0 0.00
17 EO 4C W-2 100 7 26.92
18 EO 3S N = 600 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 8,97 %
B.6 Claire Derieuw -Diane Deslignes 43,40 %
19 EO 3S E+2 -660 24 92.31
20 EO 4P S = 620 15 57.69
21 EO 5C N+2 710 10 38.46 µ Tbl = 62,82 %
B.3 Christiane Huby -Michele Berrier 48,06 %
22 EO 3S W+2 -660 21 80.77
23 EO 3S W+2 -660 9 34.62
24 EO 3S S+1 430 0.1 0.38 µ Tbl = 38,59 %
Total : 246,1 / 624 = 39,44 %
PAIRE A.3 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson
A12 Elie Behaghel -Anita Muuls 48,96 %
1 NS 3S S-1 -50 9 34.62
2 NS 1S E = -90 5 19.23
3 NS 3K S+4 190 10 38.46 µ Tbl = 30,77 %
A11 Alyona Pascaru -Arielle Miller 46,51 %
4 NS 2K W+3 -150 15 57.69
5 NS 4C N+1 650 23 88.46
6 NS 3S E = -600 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A10 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 53,93 %
7 NS 4CcS-1 -200 0 0.00
8 NS 3T S+1 130 5 19.23
9 NS 4P W = -620 20 76.92 µ Tbl = 32,05 %
A.9 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 57,40 %
10 NS 4P E+3 -710 9 34.62
11 NS 1S N-1 -50 9 34.62
12 NS 3K E+1 -130 4 15.38 µ Tbl = 28,21 %
A.8 Ghislain le Hardy de B. -Lydia Luyten 55,58 %
13 NS 2P S = 110 14 53.85
14 NS 2C E+3 -200 4 15.38
15 NS 4P N+1 650 24 92.31 µ Tbl = 53,85 %
A.7 Didier Collart -Patricia Bardy 45,80 %
16 NS 2P S-2 -100 7 26.92
17 NS 3S E-1 50 9 34.62
18 NS 2S N = 120 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 38,46 %
A14 Aida Zumot -Claire de Quirini 52,12 %
19 NS 3S E+1 -630 6 23.08
20 NS 2P S+4 230 7 26.92
21 NS 4C N = 620 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
A13 François Regis Lamy -Christiane de le Court 45,93 %
22 NS 3S W+2 -660 5 19.23
23 NS 3S W+2 -660 17 65.38
24 NS 60%60% Ajust 15.6 60.00 µ Tbl = 48,21 %
Total : 245,6 / 624 = 39,36 %
|