B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 59,26 B.8 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne
--- 2 56,40 B.1 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur
--- 3 56,32 A.4 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker
--- 4 54,32 B.3 Fabienne Smit -Patrick Gilles
--- 5 53,22 A.7 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere
--- 6 52,88 B.4 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Marie J. de Wagheneire
--- 7 51,28 A.1 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski
--- 8 50,14 A.5 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne
--- 9 49,53 A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Monique Crouan
--- 10 48,96 B.5 Marie Claire Vienne -Francine Dozin
--- 11 47,13 B.6 Helene Lemberger -Mado Miller
--- 12 45,79 A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens
--- 13 44,99 A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois
--- 14 44,68 B.2 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry
--- 15 43,06 A.8 Michele Verhulst -Thierry de Thibault
--- 16 42,49 B.7 Thierry Goemaere -Claire Derieuw
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 61,90 a.2 Michel Paquot -Lydia Wildiers
--- 2 56,65 b.6 Olivier Paternostre -Diane Emsens
--- 3 53,50 a.7 Michel Lievens -Stan Tabor
--- 4 53,11 a.6 Lydia Luyten -Diane Deslignes
--- 5 53,04 b.2 Gerard Cooreman -Didier Collart
--- 6 52,22 a.5 Serge Alard -Teresa Dekoster
--- 7 52,21 b.4 Nicolas de Neve -Cécile Drion de Chapois
--- 8 51,46 b.7 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys
--- 9 49,81 a.3 Ines Drory -Myriam de Timary
--- 10 49,08 a.8 Jeanine Bontemps -Helene Christiaens
--- 11 48,72 b.1 Noelle Fosse -Marie Christine Remy
--- 12 48,36 b.5 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw
--- 13 47,25 a.4 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
--- 14 46,62 b.8 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver
--- 15 39,22 a.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Catherine de Moffarts
--- 16 36,82 b.3 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck
PAIRE B.8 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne
b.8 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver 46,62 %
1 NS 3S W+2 -460 8 26.67
2 NS 2T S+2 130 28 93.33
3 NS 4C W = -620 20 66.67 µ Tbl = 62,22 %
b.7 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 51,46 %
4 NS 2K N+1 110 22 73.33
5 NS 2P N = 110 21 70.00
6 NS 3S N-1 -50 7 23.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
b.6 Olivier Paternostre -Diane Emsens 56,65 %
7 NS 3P S+1 170 7 23.33
8 NS 3C E+1 -170 7 23.33
9 NS 3T N-1 -50 3 10.00 µ Tbl = 18,89 %
b.5 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 48,36 %
10 NS 3S N = 600 24 80.00
11 NS 5T W = -400 5 16.67
12 NS 3S E-2 100 26.7 89.00 µ Tbl = 61,89 %
b.4 Nicolas de Neve -Cécile Drion de Chapois 52,21 %
13 NS 2P N+2 170 25 83.33
14 NS 4C W-2 100 20 66.67
15 NS 1S S+4 210 30 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
b.3 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 36,82 %
16 NS 3S E-2 200 30 100.00
17 NS 1S S = 90 15 50.00
18 NS 1S N+3 180 27 90.00 µ Tbl = 80,00 %
b.2 Gerard Cooreman -Didier Collart 53,04 %
19 NS 4P E = -620 15 50.00
20 NS 5K S-1 -100 6 20.00
21 NS 2K E-2 100 23 76.67 µ Tbl = 48,89 %
b.1 Noelle Fosse -Marie Christine Remy 48,72 %
22 NS 50%50% Ajust 15 50.00
23 NS 3S W-2 200 17 56.67
24 NS 4C N+1 450 25 83.33 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
Total : 426,7 / 720 = 59,26 %
PAIRE B.1 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur
b.1 Noelle Fosse -Marie Christine Remy 48,72 %
1 NS 3S W+2 -460 8 26.67
2 NS 3P W-2 100 23 76.67
3 NS 4C W = -620 20 66.67 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
b.8 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver 46,62 %
4 NS 2K N+2 130 28 93.33
5 NS 2K W-1 50 8 26.67
6 NS 3S N+1 430 27 90.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
b.7 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 51,46 %
7 NS 3P S+3 230 10 33.33
8 NS 3C E+1 -170 7 23.33
9 NS 3T N-1 -50 3 10.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
b.6 Olivier Paternostre -Diane Emsens 56,65 %
10 NS 3S N-1 -100 8 26.67
11 NS 3T E-2 100 15 50.00
12 NS 3T W+2 -150 8.6 28.67 µ Tbl = 35,11 %
b.5 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 48,36 %
13 NS 3S S+1 630 30 100.00
14 NS 4C W-1 50 7 23.33
15 NS 2T N+2 130 26 86.67 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
b.4 Nicolas de Neve -Cécile Drion de Chapois 52,21 %
16 NS 3S E = -600 16 53.33
17 NS 1S S+1 120 27 90.00
18 NS 2S N = 120 12 40.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
b.3 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 36,82 %
19 NS 2C N-3 -150 25 83.33
20 NS 4PcW-4 1100 30 100.00
21 NS 1K E-1 50 15 50.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
b.2 Gerard Cooreman -Didier Collart 53,04 %
22 NS 3S S+2 460 22.5 75.00
23 NS 3S W-2 200 17 56.67
24 NS 4C N = 420 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
Total : 406,1 / 720 = 56,40 %
PAIRE A.4 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker
a.7 Michel Lievens -Stan Tabor 53,50 %
1 NS 3S W+2 -460 8 26.67
2 NS 2P W = -110 13 43.33
3 NS 4C W+1 -650 5 16.67 µ Tbl = 28,89 %
a.6 Lydia Luyten -Diane Deslignes 53,11 %
4 NS 3K N = 110 22 73.33
5 NS 3P N = 140 28 93.33
6 NS 3S N-1 -50 7 23.33 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
a.5 Serge Alard -Teresa Dekoster 52,22 %
7 NS 4P S+1 650 22 73.33
8 NS 3C E+1 -170 7 23.33
9 NS 3T N = 110 24 80.00 µ Tbl = 58,89 %
a.4 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 47,25 %
10 NS 3S S-1 -100 8 26.67
11 NS 3S E-4 200 30 100.00
12 NS 60%50% Ajust 18 60.00 µ Tbl = 62,22 %
a.3 Ines Drory -Myriam de Timary 49,81 %
13 NS 2P N+2 170 25 83.33
14 NS 4C W-1 50 7 23.33
15 NS 1S S+1 120 20 66.67 µ Tbl = 57,78 %
a.2 Michel Paquot -Lydia Wildiers 61,90 %
16 NS 3S E+1 -630 8 26.67
17 NS 1S S-1 -50 4 13.33
18 NS 2S S+2 180 27 90.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
a.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Catherine de Moffarts 39,22 %
19 NS 2S W+1 -150 25 83.33
20 NS 3PcW-3 800 28 93.33
21 NS 4P W-5 250 30 100.00 µ Tbl = 92,22 %
a.8 Jeanine Bontemps -Helene Christiaens 49,08 %
22 NS 3S S+2 460 22.5 75.00
23 NS 3S W-2 200 17 56.67
24 NS 6S N-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 43,89 %
Total : 405,5 / 720 = 56,32 %
PAIRE B.3 Fabienne Smit -Patrick Gilles
b.5 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 48,36 %
1 NS 3S W+2 -460 8 26.67
2 NS 2P W = -110 13 43.33
3 NS 4C W = -620 20 66.67 µ Tbl = 45,56 %
b.4 Nicolas de Neve -Cécile Drion de Chapois 52,21 %
4 NS 2P W = -110 7 23.33
5 NS 3C E-2 100 14 46.67
6 NS 4C S-1 -50 7 23.33 µ Tbl = 31,11 %
b.3 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 36,82 %
7 NS 4P S+2 680 29 96.67
8 NS 4C E = -420 1 3.33
9 NS 2T N+1 110 24 80.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
b.2 Gerard Cooreman -Didier Collart 53,04 %
10 NS 3S S+1 630 30 100.00
11 NS 5C E-3 150 25 83.33
12 NS 3T W+2 -150 8.6 28.67 µ Tbl = 70,67 %
b.1 Noelle Fosse -Marie Christine Remy 48,72 %
13 NS 2P N+1 140 21 70.00
14 NS 4C W-2 100 20 66.67
15 NS 2S N-1 -100 5 16.67 µ Tbl = 51,11 %
b.8 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver 46,62 %
16 NS 4K W = -130 20 66.67
17 NS 1S S+1 120 27 90.00
18 NS 2S S = 120 12 40.00 µ Tbl = 65,56 %
b.7 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 51,46 %
19 NS 2C S-2 -100 29 96.67
20 NS 2P W-1 100 13 43.33
21 NS 2K N = 90 20 66.67 µ Tbl = 68,89 %
b.6 Olivier Paternostre -Diane Emsens 56,65 %
22 NS 3S N = 400 7.5 25.00
23 NS 3S W-2 200 17 56.67
24 NS 4C S = 420 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
Total : 391,1 / 720 = 54,32 %
PAIRE A.7 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere
a.6 Lydia Luyten -Diane Deslignes 53,11 %
1 NS 6K E = -920 0 0.00
2 NS 1S S+2 150 30 100.00
3 NS 4C W = -620 20 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.5 Serge Alard -Teresa Dekoster 52,22 %
4 NS 3K N = 110 22 73.33
5 NS 2P N-1 -100 2 6.67
6 NS 3K E-2 200 18 60.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
a.4 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 47,25 %
7 NS 4P S+1 650 22 73.33
8 NS 4C E-1 50 28 93.33
9 NS 2T N = 90 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
a.3 Ines Drory -Myriam de Timary 49,81 %
10 NS 3S S = 600 24 80.00
11 NS 3S E-2 100 15 50.00
12 NS 3S E-3 150 29.9 99.67 µ Tbl = 76,56 %
a.2 Michel Paquot -Lydia Wildiers 61,90 %
13 NS 3P N-1 -100 3 10.00
14 NS 4C E-2 100 20 66.67
15 NS 1S S-1 -100 5 16.67 µ Tbl = 31,11 %
a.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Catherine de Moffarts 39,22 %
16 NS 3S E+1 -630 8 26.67
17 NS 1S S = 90 15 50.00
18 NS 2S N+1 150 21 70.00 µ Tbl = 48,89 %
a.8 Jeanine Bontemps -Helene Christiaens 49,08 %
19 NS 3S W+1 -630 6 20.00
20 NS 2P W-3 300 25 83.33
21 NS 1S E = -90 7 23.33 µ Tbl = 42,22 %
a.7 Michel Lievens -Stan Tabor 53,50 %
22 NS 4P S+1 450 19.3 64.33
23 NS 3S W-2 200 17 56.67
24 NS 4C S = 420 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 54,78 %
Total : 383,2 / 720 = 53,22 %
PAIRE B.4 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Marie J. de Wagheneire
b.7 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 51,46 %
1 NS 3S E+1 -430 21 70.00
2 NS 3PcW-1 100 23 76.67
3 NS 4C W = -620 20 66.67 µ Tbl = 71,11 %
b.6 Olivier Paternostre -Diane Emsens 56,65 %
4 NS 2K N = 90 16 53.33
5 NS 1S W-1 50 8 26.67
6 NS 2ScE-6 1700 30 100.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
b.5 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 48,36 %
7 NS 4P S+1 650 22 73.33
8 NS 4C E = -420 1 3.33
9 NS 2T N+1 110 24 80.00 µ Tbl = 52,22 %
b.4 Nicolas de Neve -Cécile Drion de Chapois 52,21 %
10 NS 3S N-1 -100 8 26.67
11 NS 4C E-1 50 8 26.67
12 NS 3T W+2 -150 8.6 28.67 µ Tbl = 27,33 %
b.3 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 36,82 %
13 NS 4P N = 620 28 93.33
14 NS 3P S-2 -100 2 6.67
15 NS 2T N+1 110 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 48,89 %
b.2 Gerard Cooreman -Didier Collart 53,04 %
16 NS 3S E = -600 16 53.33
17 NS 1S S-1 -50 4 13.33
18 NS 1S S+2 150 21 70.00 µ Tbl = 45,56 %
b.1 Noelle Fosse -Marie Christine Remy 48,72 %
19 NS 3S W = -600 20 66.67
20 NS 3P W-1 100 13 43.33
21 NS 2P W-1 50 15 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
b.8 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver 46,62 %
22 NS 5T N+1 420 16.1 53.67
23 NS 3S W-2 200 17 56.67
24 NS 4C S+1 450 25 83.33 µ Tbl = 64,56 %
Total : 380,7 / 720 = 52,88 %
PAIRE A.1 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski
a.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Catherine de Moffarts 39,22 %
1 NS 3S E+1 -430 21 70.00
2 NS 2P W = -110 13 43.33
3 NS 4C W = -620 20 66.67 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a.8 Jeanine Bontemps -Helene Christiaens 49,08 %
4 NS 2P W = -110 7 23.33
5 NS 1S W = -90 4 13.33
6 NS 4C S = 420 24 80.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.7 Michel Lievens -Stan Tabor 53,50 %
7 NS 4P S = 620 14 46.67
8 NS 3C E = -140 18 60.00
9 NS 1S N+1 120 30 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,89 %
a.6 Lydia Luyten -Diane Deslignes 53,11 %
10 NS 3S S-1 -100 8 26.67
11 NS 3S E-2 100 15 50.00
12 NS 3T W+1 -130 16.1 53.67 µ Tbl = 43,44 %
a.5 Serge Alard -Teresa Dekoster 52,22 %
13 NS 4P N-1 -100 3 10.00
14 NS 4C E-3 150 30 100.00
15 NS 3S N-1 -100 5 16.67 µ Tbl = 42,22 %
a.4 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 47,25 %
16 NS 3S E+1 -630 8 26.67
17 NS 1S S = 90 15 50.00
18 NS 2S N+1 150 21 70.00 µ Tbl = 48,89 %
a.3 Ines Drory -Myriam de Timary 49,81 %
19 NS 3S E+1 -630 6 20.00
20 NS 3S N-1 -100 6 20.00
21 NS 2C S = 110 27 90.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
a.2 Michel Paquot -Lydia Wildiers 61,90 %
22 NS 5T N+1 420 16.1 53.67
23 NS 3S W-2 200 17 56.67
24 NS 4C N+1 450 25 83.33 µ Tbl = 64,56 %
Total : 369,2 / 720 = 51,28 %
PAIRE A.5 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne
a.2 Michel Paquot -Lydia Wildiers 61,90 %
1 NS 3S W+2 -460 8 26.67
2 NS 3P W-1 50 20 66.67
3 NS 4C W+2 -680 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,11 %
a.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Catherine de Moffarts 39,22 %
4 NS 3P W-2 200 30 100.00
5 NS 2P N = 110 21 70.00
6 NS 3S N-1 -50 7 23.33 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
a.8 Jeanine Bontemps -Helene Christiaens 49,08 %
7 NS 4P S+1 650 22 73.33
8 NS 3C E+1 -170 7 23.33
9 NS 2T N+1 110 24 80.00 µ Tbl = 58,89 %
a.7 Michel Lievens -Stan Tabor 53,50 %
10 NS 3S S-1 -100 8 26.67
11 NS 3S E-2 100 15 50.00
12 NS 5T W-1 50 22.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 50,56 %
a.6 Lydia Luyten -Diane Deslignes 53,11 %
13 NS 2P N = 110 12 40.00
14 NS 3S E-2 100 20 66.67
15 NS 2K W-1 50 10 33.33 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
a.5 Serge Alard -Teresa Dekoster 52,22 %
16 NS 3S E-1 100 25 83.33
17 NS 1S S = 90 15 50.00
18 NS 2S S = 120 12 40.00 µ Tbl = 57,78 %
a.4 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 47,25 %
19 NS 3S W = -600 20 66.67
20 NS 3K N+1 130 18 60.00
21 NS 1S W-1 50 15 50.00 µ Tbl = 58,89 %
a.3 Ines Drory -Myriam de Timary 49,81 %
22 NS 3S S = 400 7.5 25.00
23 NS 3S W-2 200 17 56.67
24 NS 3C N+1 170 5 16.67 µ Tbl = 32,78 %
Total : 361,0 / 720 = 50,14 %
PAIRE A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Monique Crouan
a.4 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 47,25 %
1 NS 3S E+1 -430 21 70.00
2 NS 3T S-1 -100 18 60.00
3 NS 4C W = -620 20 66.67 µ Tbl = 65,56 %
a.3 Ines Drory -Myriam de Timary 49,81 %
4 NS 3P W = -140 0 0.00
5 NS 2P N+1 140 28 93.33
6 NS 3S N-1 -50 7 23.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.2 Michel Paquot -Lydia Wildiers 61,90 %
7 NS 4P S+1 650 22 73.33
8 NS 4C E-1 50 28 93.33
9 NS 2T N = 90 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
a.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Catherine de Moffarts 39,22 %
10 NS 3S S = 600 24 80.00
11 NS 4C E-2 100 15 50.00
12 NS 3T W+1 -130 16.1 53.67 µ Tbl = 61,22 %
a.8 Jeanine Bontemps -Helene Christiaens 49,08 %
13 NS 4P N-2 -200 0 0.00
14 NS 4C W-2 100 20 66.67
15 NS 2T N+1 110 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 37,78 %
a.7 Michel Lievens -Stan Tabor 53,50 %
16 NS 5K W-1 100 25 83.33
17 NS 2T W = -90 0 0.00
18 NS 2S N = 120 12 40.00 µ Tbl = 41,11 %
a.6 Lydia Luyten -Diane Deslignes 53,11 %
19 NS 4P E = -620 15 50.00
20 NS 3C N-1 -100 6 20.00
21 NS 2P W-2 100 23 76.67 µ Tbl = 48,89 %
a.5 Serge Alard -Teresa Dekoster 52,22 %
22 NS 5T N = 400 7.5 25.00
23 NS 3S W-2 200 17 56.67
24 NS 3C N+1 170 5 16.67 µ Tbl = 32,78 %
Total : 356,6 / 720 = 49,53 %
PAIRE B.5 Marie Claire Vienne -Francine Dozin
b.2 Gerard Cooreman -Didier Collart 53,04 %
1 NS 3S E+2 -460 8 26.67
2 NS 2P W+1 -140 6 20.00
3 NS 4C W+1 -650 5 16.67 µ Tbl = 21,11 %
b.1 Noelle Fosse -Marie Christine Remy 48,72 %
4 NS 3K N-1 -100 14 46.67
5 NS 2P N+1 140 28 93.33
6 NS 4C S-1 -50 7 23.33 µ Tbl = 54,44 %
b.8 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver 46,62 %
7 NS 4P S = 620 14 46.67
8 NS 3C E = -140 18 60.00
9 NS 2T N = 90 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
b.7 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 51,46 %
10 NS 3S S-1 -100 8 26.67
11 NS 3S E-2 100 15 50.00
12 NS 5TcW-1 100 26.7 89.00 µ Tbl = 55,22 %
b.6 Olivier Paternostre -Diane Emsens 56,65 %
13 NS 2P N = 110 12 40.00
14 NS 4C W-2 100 20 66.67
15 NS 2S N-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
b.5 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 48,36 %
16 NS 3S E+2 -660 1 3.33
17 NS 1S S+1 120 27 90.00
18 NS 1S S = 90 6 20.00 µ Tbl = 37,78 %
b.4 Nicolas de Neve -Cécile Drion de Chapois 52,21 %
19 NS 2C S-2 -100 29 96.67
20 NS 3P W-3 300 25 83.33
21 NS 2P W-1 50 15 50.00 µ Tbl = 76,67 %
b.3 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 36,82 %
22 NS 3S N+3 490 27.8 92.67
23 NS 3K W+1 -130 2 6.67
24 NS 4C S+1 450 25 83.33 µ Tbl = 60,89 %
Total : 352,5 / 720 = 48,96 %
PAIRE B.6 Helene Lemberger -Mado Miller
b.4 Nicolas de Neve -Cécile Drion de Chapois 52,21 %
1 NS 3S W+1 -430 21 70.00
2 NS 2P W+1 -140 6 20.00
3 NS 4C W+1 -650 5 16.67 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
b.3 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 36,82 %
4 NS 3K N = 110 22 73.33
5 NS 2P N = 110 21 70.00
6 NS 3S N+1 430 27 90.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
b.2 Gerard Cooreman -Didier Collart 53,04 %
7 NS 4P S = 620 14 46.67
8 NS 3C E = -140 18 60.00
9 NS 3S S-1 -50 3 10.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
b.1 Noelle Fosse -Marie Christine Remy 48,72 %
10 NS 3K S = 110 16 53.33
11 NS 3S E-3 150 25 83.33
12 NS 3S E = -400 2.2 7.33 µ Tbl = 48,00 %
b.8 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver 46,62 %
13 NS 2P N = 110 12 40.00
14 NS 4C E-2 100 20 66.67
15 NS 3T N+1 130 26 86.67 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
b.7 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 51,46 %
16 NS 3S E+1 -630 8 26.67
17 NS 1S S = 90 15 50.00
18 NS 3S N-1 -100 2 6.67 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
b.6 Olivier Paternostre -Diane Emsens 56,65 %
19 NS 3S W+1 -630 6 20.00
20 NS 3PcW-1 200 21 70.00
21 NS 1S E = -90 7 23.33 µ Tbl = 37,78 %
b.5 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 48,36 %
22 NS 3T N+3 170 0.1 0.33
23 NS 3S W-2 200 17 56.67
24 NS 5C S = 450 25 83.33 µ Tbl = 46,78 %
Total : 339,3 / 720 = 47,13 %
PAIRE A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens
a.5 Serge Alard -Teresa Dekoster 52,22 %
1 NS 3S W+1 -430 21 70.00
2 NS 1S S+1 120 26 86.67
3 NS 4C W+1 -650 5 16.67 µ Tbl = 57,78 %
a.4 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 47,25 %
4 NS 2P W = -110 7 23.33
5 NS 3T E = -110 0 0.00
6 NS 3S S = 400 21 70.00 µ Tbl = 31,11 %
a.3 Ines Drory -Myriam de Timary 49,81 %
7 NS 4P S-1 -100 2 6.67
8 NS 4C E-1 50 28 93.33
9 NS 2T N = 90 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 47,78 %
a.2 Michel Paquot -Lydia Wildiers 61,90 %
10 NS 5K S-1 -100 8 26.67
11 NS 4C W+1 -450 0 0.00
12 NS 5T W = -400 2.2 7.33 µ Tbl = 11,33 %
a.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Catherine de Moffarts 39,22 %
13 NS 2P N = 110 12 40.00
14 NS 4C W-2 100 20 66.67
15 NS 2T N+1 110 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 51,11 %
a.8 Jeanine Bontemps -Helene Christiaens 49,08 %
16 NS 3S E+1 -630 8 26.67
17 NS 1S S = 90 15 50.00
18 NS 3S N = 600 30 100.00 µ Tbl = 58,89 %
a.7 Michel Lievens -Stan Tabor 53,50 %
19 NS 3S W = -600 20 66.67
20 NS 3P W-2 200 21 70.00
21 NS 1S E = -90 7 23.33 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
a.6 Lydia Luyten -Diane Deslignes 53,11 %
22 NS 3S N = 400 7.5 25.00
23 NS 3S W-2 200 17 56.67
24 NS 4C S+1 450 25 83.33 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
Total : 329,7 / 720 = 45,79 %
PAIRE A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois
a.3 Ines Drory -Myriam de Timary 49,81 %
1 NS 3S E+2 -460 8 26.67
2 NS 3S S-2 -200 2 6.67
3 NS 4C W = -620 20 66.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.2 Michel Paquot -Lydia Wildiers 61,90 %
4 NS 2P W = -110 7 23.33
5 NS 3C E-2 100 14 46.67
6 NS 3S N = 400 21 70.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
a.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Catherine de Moffarts 39,22 %
7 NS 4P N+2 680 29 96.67
8 NS 3C E = -140 18 60.00
9 NS 2T N = 90 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.8 Jeanine Bontemps -Helene Christiaens 49,08 %
10 NS 2K S+2 130 18 60.00
11 NS 3S E-3 150 25 83.33
12 NS 3T W+1 -130 16.1 53.67 µ Tbl = 65,67 %
a.7 Michel Lievens -Stan Tabor 53,50 %
13 NS 2P N = 110 12 40.00
14 NS 4C W-1 50 7 23.33
15 NS 3T N+1 130 26 86.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.6 Lydia Luyten -Diane Deslignes 53,11 %
16 NS 3S E+2 -660 1 3.33
17 NS 1S S = 90 15 50.00
18 NS 2S N-1 -100 2 6.67 µ Tbl = 20,00 %
a.5 Serge Alard -Teresa Dekoster 52,22 %
19 NS 3S W+1 -630 6 20.00
20 NS 3K S = 110 16 53.33
21 NS 1S E = -90 7 23.33 µ Tbl = 32,22 %
a.4 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 47,25 %
22 NS 3S N+3 490 27.8 92.67
23 NS 3K E+2 -150 0 0.00
24 NS 4C N = 420 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 45,33 %
Total : 323,9 / 720 = 44,99 %
PAIRE B.2 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry
b.3 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 36,82 %
1 NS 5K E+1 -420 29 96.67
2 NS 5TcS-3 -800 0 0.00
3 NS 4C W = -620 20 66.67 µ Tbl = 54,44 %
b.2 Gerard Cooreman -Didier Collart 53,04 %
4 NS 3T E = -110 7 23.33
5 NS 3S W-2 100 14 46.67
6 NS 2P S = 110 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 41,11 %
b.1 Noelle Fosse -Marie Christine Remy 48,72 %
7 NS 4P S-1 -100 2 6.67
8 NS 3C E = -140 18 60.00
9 NS 3T N = 110 24 80.00 µ Tbl = 48,89 %
b.8 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver 46,62 %
10 NS 3S S = 600 24 80.00
11 NS 5T W = -400 5 16.67
12 NS 5T E = -400 2.2 7.33 µ Tbl = 34,67 %
b.7 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 51,46 %
13 NS 2P N = 110 12 40.00
14 NS 2C W+1 -140 0 0.00
15 NS 1S S+1 120 20 66.67 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
b.6 Olivier Paternostre -Diane Emsens 56,65 %
16 NS 3S E = -600 16 53.33
17 NS 1S S = 90 15 50.00
18 NS 2S S+1 150 21 70.00 µ Tbl = 57,78 %
b.5 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 48,36 %
19 NS 3S W+1 -630 6 20.00
20 NS 4C S-1 -100 6 20.00
21 NS 2C S = 110 27 90.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
b.4 Nicolas de Neve -Cécile Drion de Chapois 52,21 %
22 NS 5T N = 400 7.5 25.00
23 NS 3S W-2 200 17 56.67
24 NS 4C N = 420 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
Total : 321,7 / 720 = 44,68 %
PAIRE A.8 Michele Verhulst -Thierry de Thibault
a.8 Jeanine Bontemps -Helene Christiaens 49,08 %
1 NS 5K E+1 -420 29 96.67
2 NS 1P W+2 -140 6 20.00
3 NS 4C W = -620 20 66.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.7 Michel Lievens -Stan Tabor 53,50 %
4 NS 2P W = -110 7 23.33
5 NS 4T W-1 50 8 26.67
6 NS 3S N-1 -50 7 23.33 µ Tbl = 24,44 %
a.6 Lydia Luyten -Diane Deslignes 53,11 %
7 NS 3P S+1 170 7 23.33
8 NS 2C E+1 -140 18 60.00
9 NS 2T N = 90 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 42,22 %
a.5 Serge Alard -Teresa Dekoster 52,22 %
10 NS 3S S = 600 24 80.00
11 NS 5T W+1 -420 2 6.67
12 NS 5T W-1 50 22.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 53,89 %
a.4 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 47,25 %
13 NS 2P N = 110 12 40.00
14 NS 4C E-1 50 7 23.33
15 NS 1S S+1 120 20 66.67 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
a.3 Ines Drory -Myriam de Timary 49,81 %
16 NS 4K W-1 100 25 83.33
17 NS 1S S+1 120 27 90.00
18 NS 2S S = 120 12 40.00 µ Tbl = 71,11 %
a.2 Michel Paquot -Lydia Wildiers 61,90 %
19 NS 3S E+1 -630 6 20.00
20 NS 2P W+1 -140 0 0.00
21 NS 1S E+2 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 6,67 %
a.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Catherine de Moffarts 39,22 %
22 NS 5T N = 400 7.5 25.00
23 NS 3S W-2 200 17 56.67
24 NS 4C S = 420 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
Total : 310,0 / 720 = 43,06 %
PAIRE B.7 Thierry Goemaere -Claire Derieuw
b.6 Olivier Paternostre -Diane Emsens 56,65 %
1 NS 3S E+1 -430 21 70.00
2 NS 1P W+1 -110 13 43.33
3 NS 4C W = -620 20 66.67 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
b.5 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 48,36 %
4 NS 3K N = 110 22 73.33
5 NS 2P N = 110 21 70.00
6 NS 3S N-1 -50 7 23.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
b.4 Nicolas de Neve -Cécile Drion de Chapois 52,21 %
7 NS 4P N-1 -100 2 6.67
8 NS 3C E = -140 18 60.00
9 NS 3T N-1 -50 3 10.00 µ Tbl = 25,56 %
b.3 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 36,82 %
10 NS 4C N-3 -300 0 0.00
11 NS 6T W-3 150 25 83.33
12 NS 3T W+1 -130 16.1 53.67 µ Tbl = 45,67 %
b.2 Gerard Cooreman -Didier Collart 53,04 %
13 NS 2P N+1 140 21 70.00
14 NS 4C W-2 100 20 66.67
15 NS 3S S-1 -100 5 16.67 µ Tbl = 51,11 %
b.1 Noelle Fosse -Marie Christine Remy 48,72 %
16 NS 3S E-1 100 25 83.33
17 NS 2S S-1 -50 4 13.33
18 NS 3S N-1 -100 2 6.67 µ Tbl = 34,44 %
b.8 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver 46,62 %
19 NS 3S W+1 -630 6 20.00
20 NS 3C N-1 -100 6 20.00
21 NS 2P W = -110 2 6.67 µ Tbl = 15,56 %
b.7 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 51,46 %
22 NS 3S N+3 490 27.8 92.67
23 NS 3S W-2 200 17 56.67
24 NS 2T S-1 -50 2 6.67 µ Tbl = 52,00 %
Total : 305,9 / 720 = 42,49 %
PAIRE a.2 Michel Paquot -Lydia Wildiers
A.5 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 50,14 %
1 EO 3S W+2 -460 22 73.33
2 EO 3P W-1 50 10 33.33
3 EO 4C W+2 -680 30 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,89 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 44,99 %
4 EO 2P W = -110 23 76.67
5 EO 3C E-2 100 16 53.33
6 EO 3S N = 400 9 30.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Monique Crouan 49,53 %
7 EO 4P S+1 650 8 26.67
8 EO 4C E-1 50 2 6.67
9 EO 2T N = 90 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 45,79 %
10 EO 5K S-1 -100 22 73.33
11 EO 4C W+1 -450 30 100.00
12 EO 5T W = -400 27.8 92.67 µ Tbl = 88,67 %
A.7 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 53,22 %
13 EO 3P N-1 -100 27 90.00
14 EO 4C E-2 100 10 33.33
15 EO 1S S-1 -100 25 83.33 µ Tbl = 68,89 %
A.4 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 56,32 %
16 EO 3S E+1 -630 22 73.33
17 EO 1S S-1 -50 26 86.67
18 EO 2S S+2 180 3 10.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
A.8 Michele Verhulst -Thierry de Thibault 43,06 %
19 EO 3S E+1 -630 24 80.00
20 EO 2P W+1 -140 30 100.00
21 EO 1S E+2 -150 30 100.00 µ Tbl = 93,33 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 51,28 %
22 EO 5T N+1 420 13.9 46.33
23 EO 3S W-2 200 13 43.33
24 EO 4C N+1 450 5 16.67 µ Tbl = 35,44 %
Total : 445,7 / 720 = 61,90 %
PAIRE b.6 Olivier Paternostre -Diane Emsens
B.7 Thierry Goemaere -Claire Derieuw 42,49 %
1 EO 3S E+1 -430 9 30.00
2 EO 1P W+1 -110 17 56.67
3 EO 4C W = -620 10 33.33 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
B.4 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Marie J. de Wagheneire 52,88 %
4 EO 2K N = 90 14 46.67
5 EO 1S W-1 50 22 73.33
6 EO 2ScE-6 1700 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
B.8 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne 59,26 %
7 EO 3P S+1 170 23 76.67
8 EO 3C E+1 -170 23 76.67
9 EO 3T N-1 -50 27 90.00 µ Tbl = 81,11 %
B.1 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur 56,40 %
10 EO 3S N-1 -100 22 73.33
11 EO 3T E-2 100 15 50.00
12 EO 3T W+2 -150 21.4 71.33 µ Tbl = 64,89 %
B.5 Marie Claire Vienne -Francine Dozin 48,96 %
13 EO 2P N = 110 18 60.00
14 EO 4C W-2 100 10 33.33
15 EO 2S N-2 -200 30 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
B.2 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry 44,68 %
16 EO 3S E = -600 14 46.67
17 EO 1S S = 90 15 50.00
18 EO 2S S+1 150 9 30.00 µ Tbl = 42,22 %
B.6 Helene Lemberger -Mado Miller 47,13 %
19 EO 3S W+1 -630 24 80.00
20 EO 3PcW-1 200 9 30.00
21 EO 1S E = -90 23 76.67 µ Tbl = 62,22 %
B.3 Fabienne Smit -Patrick Gilles 54,32 %
22 EO 3S N = 400 22.5 75.00
23 EO 3S W-2 200 13 43.33
24 EO 4C S = 420 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
Total : 407,9 / 720 = 56,65 %
PAIRE a.7 Michel Lievens -Stan Tabor
A.4 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 56,32 %
1 EO 3S W+2 -460 22 73.33
2 EO 2P W = -110 17 56.67
3 EO 4C W+1 -650 25 83.33 µ Tbl = 71,11 %
A.8 Michele Verhulst -Thierry de Thibault 43,06 %
4 EO 2P W = -110 23 76.67
5 EO 4T W-1 50 22 73.33
6 EO 3S N-1 -50 23 76.67 µ Tbl = 75,56 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 51,28 %
7 EO 4P S = 620 16 53.33
8 EO 3C E = -140 12 40.00
9 EO 1S N+1 120 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,11 %
A.5 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 50,14 %
10 EO 3S S-1 -100 22 73.33
11 EO 3S E-2 100 15 50.00
12 EO 5T W-1 50 7.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 49,44 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 44,99 %
13 EO 2P N = 110 18 60.00
14 EO 4C W-1 50 23 76.67
15 EO 3T N+1 130 4 13.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Monique Crouan 49,53 %
16 EO 5K W-1 100 5 16.67
17 EO 2T W = -90 30 100.00
18 EO 2S N = 120 18 60.00 µ Tbl = 58,89 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 45,79 %
19 EO 3S W = -600 10 33.33
20 EO 3P W-2 200 9 30.00
21 EO 1S E = -90 23 76.67 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
A.7 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 53,22 %
22 EO 4P S+1 450 10.7 35.67
23 EO 3S W-2 200 13 43.33
24 EO 4C S = 420 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 45,22 %
Total : 385,2 / 720 = 53,50 %
PAIRE a.6 Lydia Luyten -Diane Deslignes
A.7 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 53,22 %
1 EO 6K E = -920 30 100.00
2 EO 1S S+2 150 0 0.00
3 EO 4C W = -620 10 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.4 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 56,32 %
4 EO 3K N = 110 8 26.67
5 EO 3P N = 140 2 6.67
6 EO 3S N-1 -50 23 76.67 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
A.8 Michele Verhulst -Thierry de Thibault 43,06 %
7 EO 3P S+1 170 23 76.67
8 EO 2C E+1 -140 12 40.00
9 EO 2T N = 90 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 57,78 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 51,28 %
10 EO 3S S-1 -100 22 73.33
11 EO 3S E-2 100 15 50.00
12 EO 3T W+1 -130 13.9 46.33 µ Tbl = 56,56 %
A.5 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 50,14 %
13 EO 2P N = 110 18 60.00
14 EO 3S E-2 100 10 33.33
15 EO 2K W-1 50 20 66.67 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 44,99 %
16 EO 3S E+2 -660 29 96.67
17 EO 1S S = 90 15 50.00
18 EO 2S N-1 -100 28 93.33 µ Tbl = 80,00 %
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Monique Crouan 49,53 %
19 EO 4P E = -620 15 50.00
20 EO 3C N-1 -100 24 80.00
21 EO 2P W-2 100 7 23.33 µ Tbl = 51,11 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 45,79 %
22 EO 3S N = 400 22.5 75.00
23 EO 3S W-2 200 13 43.33
24 EO 4C S+1 450 5 16.67 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
Total : 382,4 / 720 = 53,11 %
PAIRE b.2 Gerard Cooreman -Didier Collart
B.5 Marie Claire Vienne -Francine Dozin 48,96 %
1 EO 3S E+2 -460 22 73.33
2 EO 2P W+1 -140 24 80.00
3 EO 4C W+1 -650 25 83.33 µ Tbl = 78,89 %
B.2 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry 44,68 %
4 EO 3T E = -110 23 76.67
5 EO 3S W-2 100 16 53.33
6 EO 2P S = 110 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 58,89 %
B.6 Helene Lemberger -Mado Miller 47,13 %
7 EO 4P S = 620 16 53.33
8 EO 3C E = -140 12 40.00
9 EO 3S S-1 -50 27 90.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
B.3 Fabienne Smit -Patrick Gilles 54,32 %
10 EO 3S S+1 630 0 0.00
11 EO 5C E-3 150 5 16.67
12 EO 3T W+2 -150 21.4 71.33 µ Tbl = 29,33 %
B.7 Thierry Goemaere -Claire Derieuw 42,49 %
13 EO 2P N+1 140 9 30.00
14 EO 4C W-2 100 10 33.33
15 EO 3S S-1 -100 25 83.33 µ Tbl = 48,89 %
B.4 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Marie J. de Wagheneire 52,88 %
16 EO 3S E = -600 14 46.67
17 EO 1S S-1 -50 26 86.67
18 EO 1S S+2 150 9 30.00 µ Tbl = 54,44 %
B.8 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne 59,26 %
19 EO 4P E = -620 15 50.00
20 EO 5K S-1 -100 24 80.00
21 EO 2K E-2 100 7 23.33 µ Tbl = 51,11 %
B.1 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur 56,40 %
22 EO 3S S+2 460 7.5 25.00
23 EO 3S W-2 200 13 43.33
24 EO 4C N = 420 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
Total : 381,9 / 720 = 53,04 %
PAIRE a.5 Serge Alard -Teresa Dekoster
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 45,79 %
1 EO 3S W+1 -430 9 30.00
2 EO 1S S+1 120 4 13.33
3 EO 4C W+1 -650 25 83.33 µ Tbl = 42,22 %
A.7 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 53,22 %
4 EO 3K N = 110 8 26.67
5 EO 2P N-1 -100 28 93.33
6 EO 3K E-2 200 12 40.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
A.4 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 56,32 %
7 EO 4P S+1 650 8 26.67
8 EO 3C E+1 -170 23 76.67
9 EO 3T N = 110 6 20.00 µ Tbl = 41,11 %
A.8 Michele Verhulst -Thierry de Thibault 43,06 %
10 EO 3S S = 600 6 20.00
11 EO 5T W+1 -420 28 93.33
12 EO 5T W-1 50 7.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 46,11 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 51,28 %
13 EO 4P N-1 -100 27 90.00
14 EO 4C E-3 150 0 0.00
15 EO 3S N-1 -100 25 83.33 µ Tbl = 57,78 %
A.5 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 50,14 %
16 EO 3S E-1 100 5 16.67
17 EO 1S S = 90 15 50.00
18 EO 2S S = 120 18 60.00 µ Tbl = 42,22 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 44,99 %
19 EO 3S W+1 -630 24 80.00
20 EO 3K S = 110 14 46.67
21 EO 1S E = -90 23 76.67 µ Tbl = 67,78 %
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Monique Crouan 49,53 %
22 EO 5T N = 400 22.5 75.00
23 EO 3S W-2 200 13 43.33
24 EO 3C N+1 170 25 83.33 µ Tbl = 67,22 %
Total : 376,0 / 720 = 52,22 %
PAIRE b.4 Nicolas de Neve -Cécile Drion de Chapois
B.6 Helene Lemberger -Mado Miller 47,13 %
1 EO 3S W+1 -430 9 30.00
2 EO 2P W+1 -140 24 80.00
3 EO 4C W+1 -650 25 83.33 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
B.3 Fabienne Smit -Patrick Gilles 54,32 %
4 EO 2P W = -110 23 76.67
5 EO 3C E-2 100 16 53.33
6 EO 4C S-1 -50 23 76.67 µ Tbl = 68,89 %
B.7 Thierry Goemaere -Claire Derieuw 42,49 %
7 EO 4P N-1 -100 28 93.33
8 EO 3C E = -140 12 40.00
9 EO 3T N-1 -50 27 90.00 µ Tbl = 74,44 %
B.4 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Marie J. de Wagheneire 52,88 %
10 EO 3S N-1 -100 22 73.33
11 EO 4C E-1 50 22 73.33
12 EO 3T W+2 -150 21.4 71.33 µ Tbl = 72,67 %
B.8 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne 59,26 %
13 EO 2P N+2 170 5 16.67
14 EO 4C W-2 100 10 33.33
15 EO 1S S+4 210 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
B.1 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur 56,40 %
16 EO 3S E = -600 14 46.67
17 EO 1S S+1 120 3 10.00
18 EO 2S N = 120 18 60.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
B.5 Marie Claire Vienne -Francine Dozin 48,96 %
19 EO 2C S-2 -100 1 3.33
20 EO 3P W-3 300 5 16.67
21 EO 2P W-1 50 15 50.00 µ Tbl = 23,33 %
B.2 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry 44,68 %
22 EO 5T N = 400 22.5 75.00
23 EO 3S W-2 200 13 43.33
24 EO 4C N = 420 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
Total : 375,9 / 720 = 52,21 %
PAIRE b.7 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys
B.4 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Marie J. de Wagheneire 52,88 %
1 EO 3S E+1 -430 9 30.00
2 EO 3PcW-1 100 7 23.33
3 EO 4C W = -620 10 33.33 µ Tbl = 28,89 %
B.8 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne 59,26 %
4 EO 2K N+1 110 8 26.67
5 EO 2P N = 110 9 30.00
6 EO 3S N-1 -50 23 76.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
B.1 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur 56,40 %
7 EO 3P S+3 230 20 66.67
8 EO 3C E+1 -170 23 76.67
9 EO 3T N-1 -50 27 90.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
B.5 Marie Claire Vienne -Francine Dozin 48,96 %
10 EO 3S S-1 -100 22 73.33
11 EO 3S E-2 100 15 50.00
12 EO 5TcW-1 100 3.3 11.00 µ Tbl = 44,78 %
B.2 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry 44,68 %
13 EO 2P N = 110 18 60.00
14 EO 2C W+1 -140 30 100.00
15 EO 1S S+1 120 10 33.33 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
B.6 Helene Lemberger -Mado Miller 47,13 %
16 EO 3S E+1 -630 22 73.33
17 EO 1S S = 90 15 50.00
18 EO 3S N-1 -100 28 93.33 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
B.3 Fabienne Smit -Patrick Gilles 54,32 %
19 EO 2C S-2 -100 1 3.33
20 EO 2P W-1 100 17 56.67
21 EO 2K N = 90 10 33.33 µ Tbl = 31,11 %
B.7 Thierry Goemaere -Claire Derieuw 42,49 %
22 EO 3S N+3 490 2.2 7.33
23 EO 3S W-2 200 13 43.33
24 EO 2T S-1 -50 28 93.33 µ Tbl = 48,00 %
Total : 370,5 / 720 = 51,46 %
PAIRE a.3 Ines Drory -Myriam de Timary
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 44,99 %
1 EO 3S E+2 -460 22 73.33
2 EO 3S S-2 -200 28 93.33
3 EO 4C W = -620 10 33.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Monique Crouan 49,53 %
4 EO 3P W = -140 30 100.00
5 EO 2P N+1 140 2 6.67
6 EO 3S N-1 -50 23 76.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 45,79 %
7 EO 4P S-1 -100 28 93.33
8 EO 4C E-1 50 2 6.67
9 EO 2T N = 90 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 52,22 %
A.7 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 53,22 %
10 EO 3S S = 600 6 20.00
11 EO 3S E-2 100 15 50.00
12 EO 3S E-3 150 0.1 0.33 µ Tbl = 23,44 %
A.4 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 56,32 %
13 EO 2P N+2 170 5 16.67
14 EO 4C W-1 50 23 76.67
15 EO 1S S+1 120 10 33.33 µ Tbl = 42,22 %
A.8 Michele Verhulst -Thierry de Thibault 43,06 %
16 EO 4K W-1 100 5 16.67
17 EO 1S S+1 120 3 10.00
18 EO 2S S = 120 18 60.00 µ Tbl = 28,89 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 51,28 %
19 EO 3S E+1 -630 24 80.00
20 EO 3S N-1 -100 24 80.00
21 EO 2C S = 110 3 10.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
A.5 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 50,14 %
22 EO 3S S = 400 22.5 75.00
23 EO 3S W-2 200 13 43.33
24 EO 3C N+1 170 25 83.33 µ Tbl = 67,22 %
Total : 358,6 / 720 = 49,81 %
PAIRE a.8 Jeanine Bontemps -Helene Christiaens
A.8 Michele Verhulst -Thierry de Thibault 43,06 %
1 EO 5K E+1 -420 1 3.33
2 EO 1P W+2 -140 24 80.00
3 EO 4C W = -620 10 33.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 51,28 %
4 EO 2P W = -110 23 76.67
5 EO 1S W = -90 26 86.67
6 EO 4C S = 420 6 20.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.5 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 50,14 %
7 EO 4P S+1 650 8 26.67
8 EO 3C E+1 -170 23 76.67
9 EO 2T N+1 110 6 20.00 µ Tbl = 41,11 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 44,99 %
10 EO 2K S+2 130 12 40.00
11 EO 3S E-3 150 5 16.67
12 EO 3T W+1 -130 13.9 46.33 µ Tbl = 34,33 %
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Monique Crouan 49,53 %
13 EO 4P N-2 -200 30 100.00
14 EO 4C W-2 100 10 33.33
15 EO 2T N+1 110 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 62,22 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 45,79 %
16 EO 3S E+1 -630 22 73.33
17 EO 1S S = 90 15 50.00
18 EO 3S N = 600 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 41,11 %
A.7 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 53,22 %
19 EO 3S W+1 -630 24 80.00
20 EO 2P W-3 300 5 16.67
21 EO 1S E = -90 23 76.67 µ Tbl = 57,78 %
A.4 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 56,32 %
22 EO 3S S+2 460 7.5 25.00
23 EO 3S W-2 200 13 43.33
24 EO 6S N-2 -100 30 100.00 µ Tbl = 56,11 %
Total : 353,4 / 720 = 49,08 %
PAIRE b.1 Noelle Fosse -Marie Christine Remy
B.1 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur 56,40 %
1 EO 3S W+2 -460 22 73.33
2 EO 3P W-2 100 7 23.33
3 EO 4C W = -620 10 33.33 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
B.5 Marie Claire Vienne -Francine Dozin 48,96 %
4 EO 3K N-1 -100 16 53.33
5 EO 2P N+1 140 2 6.67
6 EO 4C S-1 -50 23 76.67 µ Tbl = 45,56 %
B.2 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry 44,68 %
7 EO 4P S-1 -100 28 93.33
8 EO 3C E = -140 12 40.00
9 EO 3T N = 110 6 20.00 µ Tbl = 51,11 %
B.6 Helene Lemberger -Mado Miller 47,13 %
10 EO 3K S = 110 14 46.67
11 EO 3S E-3 150 5 16.67
12 EO 3S E = -400 27.8 92.67 µ Tbl = 52,00 %
B.3 Fabienne Smit -Patrick Gilles 54,32 %
13 EO 2P N+1 140 9 30.00
14 EO 4C W-2 100 10 33.33
15 EO 2S N-1 -100 25 83.33 µ Tbl = 48,89 %
B.7 Thierry Goemaere -Claire Derieuw 42,49 %
16 EO 3S E-1 100 5 16.67
17 EO 2S S-1 -50 26 86.67
18 EO 3S N-1 -100 28 93.33 µ Tbl = 65,56 %
B.4 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Marie J. de Wagheneire 52,88 %
19 EO 3S W = -600 10 33.33
20 EO 3P W-1 100 17 56.67
21 EO 2P W-1 50 15 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
B.8 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne 59,26 %
22 EO 50%50% Ajust 15 50.00
23 EO 3S W-2 200 13 43.33
24 EO 4C N+1 450 5 16.67 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
Total : 350,8 / 720 = 48,72 %
PAIRE b.5 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw
B.3 Fabienne Smit -Patrick Gilles 54,32 %
1 EO 3S W+2 -460 22 73.33
2 EO 2P W = -110 17 56.67
3 EO 4C W = -620 10 33.33 µ Tbl = 54,44 %
B.7 Thierry Goemaere -Claire Derieuw 42,49 %
4 EO 3K N = 110 8 26.67
5 EO 2P N = 110 9 30.00
6 EO 3S N-1 -50 23 76.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
B.4 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Marie J. de Wagheneire 52,88 %
7 EO 4P S+1 650 8 26.67
8 EO 4C E = -420 29 96.67
9 EO 2T N+1 110 6 20.00 µ Tbl = 47,78 %
B.8 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne 59,26 %
10 EO 3S N = 600 6 20.00
11 EO 5T W = -400 25 83.33
12 EO 3S E-2 100 3.3 11.00 µ Tbl = 38,11 %
B.1 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur 56,40 %
13 EO 3S S+1 630 0 0.00
14 EO 4C W-1 50 23 76.67
15 EO 2T N+2 130 4 13.33 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
B.5 Marie Claire Vienne -Francine Dozin 48,96 %
16 EO 3S E+2 -660 29 96.67
17 EO 1S S+1 120 3 10.00
18 EO 1S S = 90 24 80.00 µ Tbl = 62,22 %
B.2 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry 44,68 %
19 EO 3S W+1 -630 24 80.00
20 EO 4C S-1 -100 24 80.00
21 EO 2C S = 110 3 10.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
B.6 Helene Lemberger -Mado Miller 47,13 %
22 EO 3T N+3 170 29.9 99.67
23 EO 3S W-2 200 13 43.33
24 EO 5C S = 450 5 16.67 µ Tbl = 53,22 %
Total : 348,2 / 720 = 48,36 %
PAIRE a.4 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Monique Crouan 49,53 %
1 EO 3S E+1 -430 9 30.00
2 EO 3T S-1 -100 12 40.00
3 EO 4C W = -620 10 33.33 µ Tbl = 34,44 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 45,79 %
4 EO 2P W = -110 23 76.67
5 EO 3T E = -110 30 100.00
6 EO 3S S = 400 9 30.00 µ Tbl = 68,89 %
A.7 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 53,22 %
7 EO 4P S+1 650 8 26.67
8 EO 4C E-1 50 2 6.67
9 EO 2T N = 90 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
A.4 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 56,32 %
10 EO 3S S-1 -100 22 73.33
11 EO 3S E-4 200 0 0.00
12 EO 60%50% Ajust 15 50.00 µ Tbl = 41,11 %
A.8 Michele Verhulst -Thierry de Thibault 43,06 %
13 EO 2P N = 110 18 60.00
14 EO 4C E-1 50 23 76.67
15 EO 1S S+1 120 10 33.33 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 51,28 %
16 EO 3S E+1 -630 22 73.33
17 EO 1S S = 90 15 50.00
18 EO 2S N+1 150 9 30.00 µ Tbl = 51,11 %
A.5 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 50,14 %
19 EO 3S W = -600 10 33.33
20 EO 3K N+1 130 12 40.00
21 EO 1S W-1 50 15 50.00 µ Tbl = 41,11 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 44,99 %
22 EO 3S N+3 490 2.2 7.33
23 EO 3K E+2 -150 30 100.00
24 EO 4C N = 420 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 54,67 %
Total : 340,2 / 720 = 47,25 %
PAIRE b.8 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver
B.8 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne 59,26 %
1 EO 3S W+2 -460 22 73.33
2 EO 2T S+2 130 2 6.67
3 EO 4C W = -620 10 33.33 µ Tbl = 37,78 %
B.1 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur 56,40 %
4 EO 2K N+2 130 2 6.67
5 EO 2K W-1 50 22 73.33
6 EO 3S N+1 430 3 10.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
B.5 Marie Claire Vienne -Francine Dozin 48,96 %
7 EO 4P S = 620 16 53.33
8 EO 3C E = -140 12 40.00
9 EO 2T N = 90 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
B.2 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry 44,68 %
10 EO 3S S = 600 6 20.00
11 EO 5T W = -400 25 83.33
12 EO 5T E = -400 27.8 92.67 µ Tbl = 65,33 %
B.6 Helene Lemberger -Mado Miller 47,13 %
13 EO 2P N = 110 18 60.00
14 EO 4C E-2 100 10 33.33
15 EO 3T N+1 130 4 13.33 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
B.3 Fabienne Smit -Patrick Gilles 54,32 %
16 EO 4K W = -130 10 33.33
17 EO 1S S+1 120 3 10.00
18 EO 2S S = 120 18 60.00 µ Tbl = 34,44 %
B.7 Thierry Goemaere -Claire Derieuw 42,49 %
19 EO 3S W+1 -630 24 80.00
20 EO 3C N-1 -100 24 80.00
21 EO 2P W = -110 28 93.33 µ Tbl = 84,44 %
B.4 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Marie J. de Wagheneire 52,88 %
22 EO 5T N+1 420 13.9 46.33
23 EO 3S W-2 200 13 43.33
24 EO 4C S+1 450 5 16.67 µ Tbl = 35,44 %
Total : 335,7 / 720 = 46,62 %
PAIRE a.1 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Catherine de Moffarts
A.1 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 51,28 %
1 EO 3S E+1 -430 9 30.00
2 EO 2P W = -110 17 56.67
3 EO 4C W = -620 10 33.33 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A.5 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 50,14 %
4 EO 3P W-2 200 0 0.00
5 EO 2P N = 110 9 30.00
6 EO 3S N-1 -50 23 76.67 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 44,99 %
7 EO 4P N+2 680 1 3.33
8 EO 3C E = -140 12 40.00
9 EO 2T N = 90 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.6 Grazia Neuenschwander -Monique Crouan 49,53 %
10 EO 3S S = 600 6 20.00
11 EO 4C E-2 100 15 50.00
12 EO 3T W+1 -130 13.9 46.33 µ Tbl = 38,78 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 45,79 %
13 EO 2P N = 110 18 60.00
14 EO 4C W-2 100 10 33.33
15 EO 2T N+1 110 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 48,89 %
A.7 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 53,22 %
16 EO 3S E+1 -630 22 73.33
17 EO 1S S = 90 15 50.00
18 EO 2S N+1 150 9 30.00 µ Tbl = 51,11 %
A.4 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 56,32 %
19 EO 2S W+1 -150 5 16.67
20 EO 3PcW-3 800 2 6.67
21 EO 4P W-5 250 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 7,78 %
A.8 Michele Verhulst -Thierry de Thibault 43,06 %
22 EO 5T N = 400 22.5 75.00
23 EO 3S W-2 200 13 43.33
24 EO 4C S = 420 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
Total : 282,4 / 720 = 39,22 %
PAIRE b.3 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck
B.2 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry 44,68 %
1 EO 5K E+1 -420 1 3.33
2 EO 5TcS-3 -800 30 100.00
3 EO 4C W = -620 10 33.33 µ Tbl = 45,56 %
B.6 Helene Lemberger -Mado Miller 47,13 %
4 EO 3K N = 110 8 26.67
5 EO 2P N = 110 9 30.00
6 EO 3S N+1 430 3 10.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
B.3 Fabienne Smit -Patrick Gilles 54,32 %
7 EO 4P S+2 680 1 3.33
8 EO 4C E = -420 29 96.67
9 EO 2T N+1 110 6 20.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
B.7 Thierry Goemaere -Claire Derieuw 42,49 %
10 EO 4C N-3 -300 30 100.00
11 EO 6T W-3 150 5 16.67
12 EO 3T W+1 -130 13.9 46.33 µ Tbl = 54,33 %
B.4 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Marie J. de Wagheneire 52,88 %
13 EO 4P N = 620 2 6.67
14 EO 3P S-2 -100 28 93.33
15 EO 2T N+1 110 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 51,11 %
B.8 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne 59,26 %
16 EO 3S E-2 200 0 0.00
17 EO 1S S = 90 15 50.00
18 EO 1S N+3 180 3 10.00 µ Tbl = 20,00 %
B.1 Luc Cartuyvels -Daniel Couvreur 56,40 %
19 EO 2C N-3 -150 5 16.67
20 EO 4PcW-4 1100 0 0.00
21 EO 1K E-1 50 15 50.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
B.5 Marie Claire Vienne -Francine Dozin 48,96 %
22 EO 3S N+3 490 2.2 7.33
23 EO 3K W+1 -130 28 93.33
24 EO 4C S+1 450 5 16.67 µ Tbl = 39,11 %
Total : 265,1 / 720 = 36,82 %
|