B.C.O.B.
Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement
--- 1 64,24 4 Alan Beckman -Hugo Baetens
--- 2 55,21 2 Thierry Bollansee -Michel Lahaut
--- ~ 55,21 7 Pascale Ortegat -Daniel Couvreur
--- 4 54,86 9 Lydia Wildiers -Gerard Cooreman
--- 5 53,82 11 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
--- 6 52,78 10 Chris Oostens -Catherine de Moffarts
--- 7 51,74 14 Benedicte Lemaigre -Brigitte de Fauconval
--- 8 51,04 8 Myriam de Timary -Chantal de Lichtervelde
--- 9 50,69 6 Annette Fobe -Michele Berrier
--- 10 47,92 3 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen
--- 11 45,49 13 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Rita Swinnen
--- 12 43,06 12 Christophe Vaes -Mariane Bosecqz
--- 13 40,97 1 Annie Zeimes -Didier Collart
--- 14 32,99 5 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst
PAIRE 4 Alan Beckman -Hugo Baetens
7 Pascale Ortegat -Daniel Couvreur 55,21 %
1 NS 5P N+1 480 7 58.33
2 NS 3S W-1 50 12 100.00
3 NS 4C S+1 450 9 75.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
14 Benedicte Lemaigre -Brigitte de Fauconval 51,74 %
4 NS 3S W+3 -690 3 25.00
5 NS 3S S+4 720 1 8.33
6 NS 3S W+3 -690 11 91.67 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
13 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Rita Swinnen 45,49 %
7 NS 3K S = 110 11 91.67
8 NS 3S N+2 460 11 91.67
9 NS 3P N = 140 12 100.00 µ Tbl = 94,44 %
12 Christophe Vaes -Mariane Bosecqz 43,06 %
10 NS 2S W+2 -180 10 83.33
11 NS 4C N = 420 8 66.67
12 NS 1S E-2 100 7 58.33 µ Tbl = 69,44 %
11 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 53,82 %
13 NS 2P W = -110 0 0.00
14 NS 4P S+1 450 12 100.00
15 NS 4P E-1 50 10 83.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
10 Chris Oostens -Catherine de Moffarts 52,78 %
16 NS 2P N-2 -100 2 16.67
17 NS 6P E = -980 4 33.33
18 NS 3S N = 600 12 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
9 Lydia Wildiers -Gerard Cooreman 54,86 %
19 NS 2K N+1 110 10 83.33
20 NS 3P N+1 170 9 75.00
21 NS 3S E+3 -490 4 33.33 µ Tbl = 63,89 %
8 Myriam de Timary -Chantal de Lichtervelde 51,04 %
22 NS 4C S = 420 4 33.33
23 NS 4C S+1 650 6 50.00
24 NS 3S E-1 50 10 83.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 185,0 / 288 = 64,24 %
PAIRE 2 Thierry Bollansee -Michel Lahaut
10 Chris Oostens -Catherine de Moffarts 52,78 %
1 NS 4P N+2 480 7 58.33
2 NS 4C E = -420 0 0.00
3 NS 4C S+1 450 9 75.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
9 Lydia Wildiers -Gerard Cooreman 54,86 %
4 NS 3S W+3 -690 3 25.00
5 NS 6P S+1 1460 7 58.33
6 NS 6S E = -1440 4 33.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
8 Myriam de Timary -Chantal de Lichtervelde 51,04 %
7 NS 2C N = 110 11 91.67
8 NS 3S N+1 430 6 50.00
9 NS 3P N-1 -50 7 58.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
7 Pascale Ortegat -Daniel Couvreur 55,21 %
10 NS 3S E = -600 7 58.33
11 NS 4C N = 420 8 66.67
12 NS 3C E-2 100 7 58.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
14 Benedicte Lemaigre -Brigitte de Fauconval 51,74 %
13 NS 2CcN = 670 12 100.00
14 NS 4P S-1 -50 6 50.00
15 NS 4P W+1 -450 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
13 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Rita Swinnen 45,49 %
16 NS 1S E-2 200 11 91.67
17 NS 4P W+2 -480 11 91.67
18 NS 5K N-1 -100 1 8.33 µ Tbl = 63,89 %
12 Christophe Vaes -Mariane Bosecqz 43,06 %
19 NS 2K N+1 110 10 83.33
20 NS 4P N+1 650 12 100.00
21 NS 3S E+2 -460 8 66.67 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
11 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 53,82 %
22 NS 4C S = 420 4 33.33
23 NS 2C S = 110 0 0.00
24 NS 3K N-2 -100 8 66.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 159,0 / 288 = 55,21 %
PAIRE 7 Pascale Ortegat -Daniel Couvreur
4 Alan Beckman -Hugo Baetens 64,24 %
1 EO 5P N+1 480 5 41.67
2 EO 3S W-1 50 0 0.00
3 EO 4C S+1 450 3 25.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
1 Annie Zeimes -Didier Collart 40,97 %
4 EO 2CcN-3 -800 12 100.00
5 EO 6P N+1 1460 5 41.67
6 EO 6S E = -1440 8 66.67 µ Tbl = 69,44 %
5 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 32,99 %
7 EO 4C N-1 -100 6 50.00
8 EO 3S N-1 -50 11 91.67
9 EO 3P N-2 -100 8 66.67 µ Tbl = 69,44 %
2 Thierry Bollansee -Michel Lahaut 55,21 %
10 EO 3S E = -600 5 41.67
11 EO 4C N = 420 4 33.33
12 EO 3C E-2 100 5 41.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
6 Annette Fobe -Michele Berrier 50,69 %
13 EO 2C N-1 -100 8 66.67
14 EO 6CcW-2 300 2 16.67
15 EO 4P E = -420 8 66.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
3 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 47,92 %
16 EO 3K W-1 100 8 66.67
17 EO 6P E = -980 8 66.67
18 EO 3P W-2 100 8 66.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
8 Myriam de Timary -Chantal de Lichtervelde 51,04 %
19 EO 3T W = -110 11 91.67
20 EO 2P N = 110 11 91.67
21 EO 6S E-2 100 2 16.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
14 Benedicte Lemaigre -Brigitte de Fauconval 51,74 %
22 NS 4C S+1 450 10 83.33
23 NS 4C S+1 650 6 50.00
24 NS 3T E = -110 5 41.67 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
Total : 159,0 / 288 = 55,21 %
PAIRE 9 Lydia Wildiers -Gerard Cooreman
5 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 32,99 %
1 EO 4P N+2 480 5 41.67
2 EO 3C E+1 -170 6 50.00
3 EO 5T W-1 100 12 100.00 µ Tbl = 63,89 %
2 Thierry Bollansee -Michel Lahaut 55,21 %
4 EO 3S W+3 -690 9 75.00
5 EO 6P S+1 1460 5 41.67
6 EO 6S E = -1440 8 66.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
6 Annette Fobe -Michele Berrier 50,69 %
7 EO 4C S-1 -100 6 50.00
8 EO 3S N+2 460 1 8.33
9 EO 3T E+1 -130 11 91.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
3 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 47,92 %
10 EO 3S E+2 -660 11 91.67
11 EO 5C N-1 -50 11 91.67
12 EO 1S E-2 100 5 41.67 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
10 Chris Oostens -Catherine de Moffarts 52,78 %
13 EO 2S S-1 -100 8 66.67
14 EO 4P S-1 -50 6 50.00
15 EO 4P E-1 50 2 16.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
8 Myriam de Timary -Chantal de Lichtervelde 51,04 %
16 NS 1S N+1 120 6 50.00
17 NS 6P E = -980 4 33.33
18 NS 3K N+1 130 8 66.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
4 Alan Beckman -Hugo Baetens 64,24 %
19 EO 2K N+1 110 2 16.67
20 EO 3P N+1 170 3 25.00
21 EO 3S E+3 -490 8 66.67 µ Tbl = 36,11 %
1 Annie Zeimes -Didier Collart 40,97 %
22 EO 4C S = 420 8 66.67
23 EO 4C S+1 650 6 50.00
24 EO 2C W = -110 7 58.33 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
Total : 158,0 / 288 = 54,86 %
PAIRE 11 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
6 Annette Fobe -Michele Berrier 50,69 %
1 EO 5P N+1 480 5 41.67
2 EO 2C E+2 -170 6 50.00
3 EO 4C S+1 450 3 25.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
3 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 47,92 %
4 EO 3S W+2 -660 4 33.33
5 EO 6P N+1 1460 5 41.67
6 EO 6S E = -1440 8 66.67 µ Tbl = 47,22 %
12 Christophe Vaes -Mariane Bosecqz 43,06 %
7 EO 3P E = -140 10 83.33
8 EO 3S N+1 430 6 50.00
9 EO 5T E-1 100 2 16.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
10 Chris Oostens -Catherine de Moffarts 52,78 %
10 NS 3S E = -600 7 58.33
11 NS 4C N = 420 8 66.67
12 NS 3T E-3 150 12 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
4 Alan Beckman -Hugo Baetens 64,24 %
13 EO 2P W = -110 12 100.00
14 EO 4P S+1 450 0 0.00
15 EO 4P E-1 50 2 16.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
1 Annie Zeimes -Didier Collart 40,97 %
16 EO 3C N = 140 4 33.33
17 EO 5P E+1 -480 1 8.33
18 EO 5K N-1 -100 11 91.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
5 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 32,99 %
19 EO 3K N-1 -50 6 50.00
20 EO 2P N = 110 11 91.67
21 EO 3S E+3 -490 8 66.67 µ Tbl = 69,44 %
2 Thierry Bollansee -Michel Lahaut 55,21 %
22 EO 4C S = 420 8 66.67
23 EO 2C S = 110 12 100.00
24 EO 3K N-2 -100 4 33.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 155,0 / 288 = 53,82 %
PAIRE 10 Chris Oostens -Catherine de Moffarts
2 Thierry Bollansee -Michel Lahaut 55,21 %
1 EO 4P N+2 480 5 41.67
2 EO 4C E = -420 12 100.00
3 EO 4C S+1 450 3 25.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
6 Annette Fobe -Michele Berrier 50,69 %
4 EO 3S W+2 -660 4 33.33
5 EO 6S S+1 1470 0 0.00
6 EO 6S E = -1440 8 66.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
3 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 47,92 %
7 EO 4C N-1 -100 6 50.00
8 EO 3S N-1 -50 11 91.67
9 EO 4P N-1 -50 5 41.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
11 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 53,82 %
10 EO 3S E = -600 5 41.67
11 EO 4C N = 420 4 33.33
12 EO 3T E-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
9 Lydia Wildiers -Gerard Cooreman 54,86 %
13 NS 2S S-1 -100 4 33.33
14 NS 4P S-1 -50 6 50.00
15 NS 4P E-1 50 10 83.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
4 Alan Beckman -Hugo Baetens 64,24 %
16 EO 2P N-2 -100 10 83.33
17 EO 6P E = -980 8 66.67
18 EO 3S N = 600 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
1 Annie Zeimes -Didier Collart 40,97 %
19 EO 3K N-2 -100 8 66.67
20 EO 3P N = 140 7 58.33
21 EO 6S W = -990 12 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
5 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 32,99 %
22 EO 4C S = 420 8 66.67
23 EO 4C S+1 650 6 50.00
24 EO 2C W+1 -140 10 83.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 152,0 / 288 = 52,78 %
PAIRE 14 Benedicte Lemaigre -Brigitte de Fauconval
13 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Rita Swinnen 45,49 %
1 NS 4P N+2 480 7 58.33
2 NS 2C W+1 -140 10 83.33
3 NS 4C S = 420 4 33.33 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
4 Alan Beckman -Hugo Baetens 64,24 %
4 EO 3S W+3 -690 9 75.00
5 EO 3S S+4 720 11 91.67
6 EO 3S W+3 -690 1 8.33 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
1 Annie Zeimes -Didier Collart 40,97 %
7 EO 4C N-2 -200 12 100.00
8 EO 3S N+1 430 6 50.00
9 EO 4K E = -130 11 91.67 µ Tbl = 80,56 %
5 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 32,99 %
10 EO 3S E+2 -660 11 91.67
11 EO 4C N = 420 4 33.33
12 EO 1S N-1 -100 12 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
2 Thierry Bollansee -Michel Lahaut 55,21 %
13 EO 2CcN = 670 0 0.00
14 EO 4P S-1 -50 6 50.00
15 EO 4P W+1 -450 12 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
6 Annette Fobe -Michele Berrier 50,69 %
16 EO 1S E-2 200 1 8.33
17 EO 6P E = -980 8 66.67
18 EO 3K S+1 130 4 33.33 µ Tbl = 36,11 %
3 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 47,92 %
19 EO 3K N = 110 2 16.67
20 EO 2P N+2 170 3 25.00
21 EO 6S W-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 13,89 %
7 Pascale Ortegat -Daniel Couvreur 55,21 %
22 EO 4C S+1 450 2 16.67
23 EO 4C S+1 650 6 50.00
24 EO 3T E = -110 7 58.33 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
Total : 149,0 / 288 = 51,74 %
PAIRE 8 Myriam de Timary -Chantal de Lichtervelde
1 Annie Zeimes -Didier Collart 40,97 %
1 EO 4P N+2 480 5 41.67
2 EO 2C E+2 -170 6 50.00
3 EO 3C S+2 200 10 83.33 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
5 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 32,99 %
4 EO 3S W+2 -660 4 33.33
5 EO 3S S+4 720 11 91.67
6 EO 6S E = -1440 8 66.67 µ Tbl = 63,89 %
2 Thierry Bollansee -Michel Lahaut 55,21 %
7 EO 2C N = 110 1 8.33
8 EO 3S N+1 430 6 50.00
9 EO 3P N-1 -50 5 41.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
6 Annette Fobe -Michele Berrier 50,69 %
10 EO 3S E+1 -630 8 66.67
11 EO 4C N-1 -50 11 91.67
12 EO 1S E-1 50 10 83.33 µ Tbl = 80,56 %
3 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 47,92 %
13 EO 2C N = 110 3 25.00
14 EO 4P S-2 -100 11 91.67
15 EO 6P E-1 50 2 16.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
9 Lydia Wildiers -Gerard Cooreman 54,86 %
16 EO 1S N+1 120 6 50.00
17 EO 6P E = -980 8 66.67
18 EO 3K N+1 130 4 33.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
7 Pascale Ortegat -Daniel Couvreur 55,21 %
19 NS 3T W = -110 1 8.33
20 NS 2P N = 110 1 8.33
21 NS 6S E-2 100 10 83.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
4 Alan Beckman -Hugo Baetens 64,24 %
22 EO 4C S = 420 8 66.67
23 EO 4C S+1 650 6 50.00
24 EO 3S E-1 50 2 16.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 147,0 / 288 = 51,04 %
PAIRE 6 Annette Fobe -Michele Berrier
11 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 53,82 %
1 NS 5P N+1 480 7 58.33
2 NS 2C E+2 -170 6 50.00
3 NS 4C S+1 450 9 75.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
10 Chris Oostens -Catherine de Moffarts 52,78 %
4 NS 3S W+2 -660 8 66.67
5 NS 6S S+1 1470 12 100.00
6 NS 6S E = -1440 4 33.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
9 Lydia Wildiers -Gerard Cooreman 54,86 %
7 NS 4C S-1 -100 6 50.00
8 NS 3S N+2 460 11 91.67
9 NS 3T E+1 -130 1 8.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
8 Myriam de Timary -Chantal de Lichtervelde 51,04 %
10 NS 3S E+1 -630 4 33.33
11 NS 4C N-1 -50 1 8.33
12 NS 1S E-1 50 2 16.67 µ Tbl = 19,44 %
7 Pascale Ortegat -Daniel Couvreur 55,21 %
13 NS 2C N-1 -100 4 33.33
14 NS 6CcW-2 300 10 83.33
15 NS 4P E = -420 4 33.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
14 Benedicte Lemaigre -Brigitte de Fauconval 51,74 %
16 NS 1S E-2 200 11 91.67
17 NS 6P E = -980 4 33.33
18 NS 3K S+1 130 8 66.67 µ Tbl = 63,89 %
13 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Rita Swinnen 45,49 %
19 NS 3T W = -110 1 8.33
20 NS 2P N+1 140 5 41.67
21 NS 3S E+3 -490 4 33.33 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
12 Christophe Vaes -Mariane Bosecqz 43,06 %
22 NS 4C S+2 480 12 100.00
23 NS 4C S+2 680 12 100.00
24 NS 2S E+2 -180 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 146,0 / 288 = 50,69 %
PAIRE 3 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen
12 Christophe Vaes -Mariane Bosecqz 43,06 %
1 NS 4P N+1 450 0 0.00
2 NS 2T S-2 -200 2 16.67
3 NS 4C S+1 450 9 75.00 µ Tbl = 30,56 %
11 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 53,82 %
4 NS 3S W+2 -660 8 66.67
5 NS 6P N+1 1460 7 58.33
6 NS 6S E = -1440 4 33.33 µ Tbl = 52,78 %
10 Chris Oostens -Catherine de Moffarts 52,78 %
7 NS 4C N-1 -100 6 50.00
8 NS 3S N-1 -50 1 8.33
9 NS 4P N-1 -50 7 58.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
9 Lydia Wildiers -Gerard Cooreman 54,86 %
10 NS 3S E+2 -660 1 8.33
11 NS 5C N-1 -50 1 8.33
12 NS 1S E-2 100 7 58.33 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
8 Myriam de Timary -Chantal de Lichtervelde 51,04 %
13 NS 2C N = 110 9 75.00
14 NS 4P S-2 -100 1 8.33
15 NS 6P E-1 50 10 83.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
7 Pascale Ortegat -Daniel Couvreur 55,21 %
16 NS 3K W-1 100 4 33.33
17 NS 6P E = -980 4 33.33
18 NS 3P W-2 100 4 33.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
14 Benedicte Lemaigre -Brigitte de Fauconval 51,74 %
19 NS 3K N = 110 10 83.33
20 NS 2P N+2 170 9 75.00
21 NS 6S W-3 150 12 100.00 µ Tbl = 86,11 %
13 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Rita Swinnen 45,49 %
22 NS 4C S = 420 4 33.33
23 NS 4C S+1 650 6 50.00
24 NS 4C W-2 100 12 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 138,0 / 288 = 47,92 %
PAIRE 13 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Rita Swinnen
14 Benedicte Lemaigre -Brigitte de Fauconval 51,74 %
1 EO 4P N+2 480 5 41.67
2 EO 2C W+1 -140 2 16.67
3 EO 4C S = 420 8 66.67 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
12 Christophe Vaes -Mariane Bosecqz 43,06 %
4 NS 3S W-1 100 12 100.00
5 NS 6P S+1 1460 7 58.33
6 NS 3S E+3 -690 11 91.67 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
4 Alan Beckman -Hugo Baetens 64,24 %
7 EO 3K S = 110 1 8.33
8 EO 3S N+2 460 1 8.33
9 EO 3P N = 140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 5,56 %
1 Annie Zeimes -Didier Collart 40,97 %
10 EO 2P W+2 -170 0 0.00
11 EO 4C N = 420 4 33.33
12 EO 2S E-2 100 5 41.67 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
5 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 32,99 %
13 EO 2C N = 110 3 25.00
14 EO 5KcS-1 -100 11 91.67
15 EO 4P E = -420 8 66.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
2 Thierry Bollansee -Michel Lahaut 55,21 %
16 EO 1S E-2 200 1 8.33
17 EO 4P W+2 -480 1 8.33
18 EO 5K N-1 -100 11 91.67 µ Tbl = 36,11 %
6 Annette Fobe -Michele Berrier 50,69 %
19 EO 3T W = -110 11 91.67
20 EO 2P N+1 140 7 58.33
21 EO 3S E+3 -490 8 66.67 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
3 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 47,92 %
22 EO 4C S = 420 8 66.67
23 EO 4C S+1 650 6 50.00
24 EO 4C W-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 131,0 / 288 = 45,49 %
PAIRE 12 Christophe Vaes -Mariane Bosecqz
3 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 47,92 %
1 EO 4P N+1 450 12 100.00
2 EO 2T S-2 -200 10 83.33
3 EO 4C S+1 450 3 25.00 µ Tbl = 69,44 %
13 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Rita Swinnen 45,49 %
4 EO 3S W-1 100 0 0.00
5 EO 6P S+1 1460 5 41.67
6 EO 3S E+3 -690 1 8.33 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
11 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 53,82 %
7 NS 3P E = -140 2 16.67
8 NS 3S N+1 430 6 50.00
9 NS 5T E-1 100 10 83.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
4 Alan Beckman -Hugo Baetens 64,24 %
10 EO 2S W+2 -180 2 16.67
11 EO 4C N = 420 4 33.33
12 EO 1S E-2 100 5 41.67 µ Tbl = 30,56 %
1 Annie Zeimes -Didier Collart 40,97 %
13 EO 3S N-1 -100 8 66.67
14 EO 4P S-1 -50 6 50.00
15 EO 4P E = -420 8 66.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
5 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 32,99 %
16 EO 1S E+1 -120 12 100.00
17 EO 6P E = -980 8 66.67
18 EO 4K S = 130 4 33.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
2 Thierry Bollansee -Michel Lahaut 55,21 %
19 EO 2K N+1 110 2 16.67
20 EO 4P N+1 650 0 0.00
21 EO 3S E+2 -460 4 33.33 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
6 Annette Fobe -Michele Berrier 50,69 %
22 EO 4C S+2 480 0 0.00
23 EO 4C S+2 680 0 0.00
24 EO 2S E+2 -180 12 100.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 124,0 / 288 = 43,06 %
PAIRE 1 Annie Zeimes -Didier Collart
8 Myriam de Timary -Chantal de Lichtervelde 51,04 %
1 NS 4P N+2 480 7 58.33
2 NS 2C E+2 -170 6 50.00
3 NS 3C S+2 200 2 16.67 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
7 Pascale Ortegat -Daniel Couvreur 55,21 %
4 NS 2CcN-3 -800 0 0.00
5 NS 6P N+1 1460 7 58.33
6 NS 6S E = -1440 4 33.33 µ Tbl = 30,56 %
14 Benedicte Lemaigre -Brigitte de Fauconval 51,74 %
7 NS 4C N-2 -200 0 0.00
8 NS 3S N+1 430 6 50.00
9 NS 4K E = -130 1 8.33 µ Tbl = 19,44 %
13 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Rita Swinnen 45,49 %
10 NS 2P W+2 -170 12 100.00
11 NS 4C N = 420 8 66.67
12 NS 2S E-2 100 7 58.33 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
12 Christophe Vaes -Mariane Bosecqz 43,06 %
13 NS 3S N-1 -100 4 33.33
14 NS 4P S-1 -50 6 50.00
15 NS 4P E = -420 4 33.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
11 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 53,82 %
16 NS 3C N = 140 8 66.67
17 NS 5P E+1 -480 11 91.67
18 NS 5K N-1 -100 1 8.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
10 Chris Oostens -Catherine de Moffarts 52,78 %
19 NS 3K N-2 -100 4 33.33
20 NS 3P N = 140 5 41.67
21 NS 6S W = -990 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
9 Lydia Wildiers -Gerard Cooreman 54,86 %
22 NS 4C S = 420 4 33.33
23 NS 4C S+1 650 6 50.00
24 NS 2C W = -110 5 41.67 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
Total : 118,0 / 288 = 40,97 %
PAIRE 5 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst
9 Lydia Wildiers -Gerard Cooreman 54,86 %
1 NS 4P N+2 480 7 58.33
2 NS 3C E+1 -170 6 50.00
3 NS 5T W-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 36,11 %
8 Myriam de Timary -Chantal de Lichtervelde 51,04 %
4 NS 3S W+2 -660 8 66.67
5 NS 3S S+4 720 1 8.33
6 NS 6S E = -1440 4 33.33 µ Tbl = 36,11 %
7 Pascale Ortegat -Daniel Couvreur 55,21 %
7 NS 4C N-1 -100 6 50.00
8 NS 3S N-1 -50 1 8.33
9 NS 3P N-2 -100 4 33.33 µ Tbl = 30,56 %
14 Benedicte Lemaigre -Brigitte de Fauconval 51,74 %
10 NS 3S E+2 -660 1 8.33
11 NS 4C N = 420 8 66.67
12 NS 1S N-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
13 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Rita Swinnen 45,49 %
13 NS 2C N = 110 9 75.00
14 NS 5KcS-1 -100 1 8.33
15 NS 4P E = -420 4 33.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
12 Christophe Vaes -Mariane Bosecqz 43,06 %
16 NS 1S E+1 -120 0 0.00
17 NS 6P E = -980 4 33.33
18 NS 4K S = 130 8 66.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
11 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 53,82 %
19 NS 3K N-1 -50 6 50.00
20 NS 2P N = 110 1 8.33
21 NS 3S E+3 -490 4 33.33 µ Tbl = 30,56 %
10 Chris Oostens -Catherine de Moffarts 52,78 %
22 NS 4C S = 420 4 33.33
23 NS 4C S+1 650 6 50.00
24 NS 2C W+1 -140 2 16.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 95,0 / 288 = 32,99 %
|