B.C.O.B.
Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 59,71 A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois
--- 2 57,23 A.9 Grazia Neuenschwander -Sophie Tilemans
--- 3 56,74 A.5 Christiane Huby -Michele Berrier
--- 4 56,67 A12 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Liliane Baptista
--- 5 53,66 A13 Thierry Goemaere -Myriam de Timary
--- 6 51,22 A.6 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst
--- 7 50,64 A10 Dominique Bourgoignie -Claire Derieuw
--- 8 49,92 A.4 Stan Tabor -Alan Beckman
--- 9 45,99 A11 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart
--- 10 45,41 A.8 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles
--- 11 41,05 A.3 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm
--- 12 41,01 A.7 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Michel Lievens
--- 13 40,43 A.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Christiane Vroninckx
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 55,93 a.6 Annick Peeters -Neslihan Buharali
--- 2 55,91 a.8 Lydia Wildiers -Benoit Ortegat
--- 3 55,34 a11 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont
--- 4 55,00 a.5 Noelle Fosse -Marie Christine Remy
--- 5 53,88 a.2 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren
--- 6 53,20 a.1 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen
--- 7 49,96 a.7 Didier Collart -Gerard Cooreman
--- 8 49,07 a10 Anne France Raquez -Nicolas de Neve
--- 9 44,53 a.9 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Prisca Tondreau
--- 10 43,33 a.3 Marguerite Verstraeten -Paul Henricot
--- 11 42,65 a.4 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
--- 12 40,93 a12 Mado Miller -Catherine de Moffarts
--- 13 0,00 a13 -
PAIRE A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois
a.2 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren 53,88 %
3 NS 1S N-1 -50 12.1 55.00
4 NS 2P W-1 100 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.1 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 53,20 %
5 NS 3S N = 600 13.2 60.00
6 NS 4P W-1 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a13 - 0,00 %
7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a12 Mado Miller -Catherine de Moffarts 40,93 %
9 NS 2S S+3 210 11 50.00
10 NS 3S E+1 -630 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a11 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 55,34 %
11 NS 4TcE-2 300 21.9 99.55
12 NS 3S E = -400 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a10 Anne France Raquez -Nicolas de Neve 49,07 %
13 NS 3P W+1 -170 18.6 84.55
14 NS 3C N = 140 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a.9 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Prisca Tondreau 44,53 %
15 NS 4P W = -420 19.7 89.55
16 NS 3T N+1 130 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a.8 Lydia Wildiers -Benoit Ortegat 55,91 %
17 NS 2P W+1 -140 2.3 10.45
18 NS 2P E+2 -170 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 5,45 %
a.7 Didier Collart -Gerard Cooreman 49,96 %
19 NS 5C S = 450 6.6 30.00
20 NS 4C N+2 680 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
a.6 Annick Peeters -Neslihan Buharali 55,93 %
21 NS 2C N = 110 14 63.64
22 NS 3S E-2 200 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a.5 Noelle Fosse -Marie Christine Remy 55,00 %
23 NS 3P S+3 230 15.4 70.00
24 NS 5C W = -450 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.4 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 42,65 %
25 NS 3S S+1 430 21.9 99.55
26 NS 4P S = 620 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 99,55 %
Total : 289,0 / 484 = 59,71 %
PAIRE A.9 Grazia Neuenschwander -Sophie Tilemans
a.4 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 42,65 %
1 NS 5T N-1 -50 11 50.00
2 NS 3S E = -400 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.3 Marguerite Verstraeten -Paul Henricot 43,33 %
3 NS 1S S-1 -50 12.1 55.00
4 NS 3T S = 110 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
a.2 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren 53,88 %
5 NS 3S S = 600 13.2 60.00
6 NS 5P W-3 300 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
a.1 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 53,20 %
7 NS 4P W-2 200 16.5 75.00
8 NS 5K N-3 -150 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
a13 - 0,00 %
9 NS BYE 0 0.00
10 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a12 Mado Miller -Catherine de Moffarts 40,93 %
11 NS 3P N = 140 19.7 89.55
12 NS 3S E-3 150 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 94,55 %
a11 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 55,34 %
13 NS 4P W = -620 11 50.00
14 NS 2C N+1 140 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a.9 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Prisca Tondreau 44,53 %
17 NS 3K E-1 50 15.4 70.00
18 NS 3P E = -140 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.8 Lydia Wildiers -Benoit Ortegat 55,91 %
19 NS 3C S+2 200 2.3 10.45
20 NS 3S N+1 630 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 15,45 %
a.7 Didier Collart -Gerard Cooreman 49,96 %
21 NS 3C S = 140 17 77.27
22 NS 3S E-2 200 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
a.6 Annick Peeters -Neslihan Buharali 55,93 %
23 NS 3P S+1 170 5.5 25.00
24 NS 5C W-1 50 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a.5 Noelle Fosse -Marie Christine Remy 55,00 %
25 NS 3S N = 400 11 50.00
26 NS 4C S-2 -200 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
Total : 277,0 / 484 = 57,23 %
PAIRE A.5 Christiane Huby -Michele Berrier
a.9 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Prisca Tondreau 44,53 %
1 NS 3T N+2 150 21.9 99.55
2 NS 3S E-1 50 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 97,05 %
a.8 Lydia Wildiers -Benoit Ortegat 55,91 %
3 NS 1S S-1 -50 12.1 55.00
4 NS 2P W = -110 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a.7 Didier Collart -Gerard Cooreman 49,96 %
5 NS 3S N = 600 13.2 60.00
6 NS 4P W-1 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.5 Noelle Fosse -Marie Christine Remy 55,00 %
9 NS 3S S+2 460 20.8 94.55
10 NS 5P E-2 200 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 97,05 %
a.4 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 42,65 %
11 NS 3T E = -110 6.6 30.00
12 NS 3S E = -400 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 27,50 %
a.3 Marguerite Verstraeten -Paul Henricot 43,33 %
13 NS 3P W+2 -200 15.4 70.00
14 NS 2C N+1 140 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 67,50 %
a.2 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren 53,88 %
15 NS 4P W+2 -480 4.5 20.45
16 NS 3T N+1 130 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a.1 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 53,20 %
17 NS 2P W = -110 7.7 35.00
18 NS 4C N = 620 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a13 - 0,00 %
19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a12 Mado Miller -Catherine de Moffarts 40,93 %
21 NS 2C S+1 140 17 77.27
22 NS 3S E-2 200 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
a11 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 55,34 %
23 NS 3P S+1 170 5.5 25.00
24 NS 4CcW = -590 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 12,73 %
a10 Anne France Raquez -Nicolas de Neve 49,07 %
25 NS 3S N = 400 11 50.00
26 NS 4P S-1 -100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
Total : 274,6 / 484 = 56,74 %
PAIRE A12 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Liliane Baptista
a10 Anne France Raquez -Nicolas de Neve 49,07 %
1 NS 4C W-1 50 15.4 70.00
2 NS 3S E = -400 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
a.9 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Prisca Tondreau 44,53 %
3 NS 2P S-1 -50 12.1 55.00
4 NS 2P W-2 200 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a.8 Lydia Wildiers -Benoit Ortegat 55,91 %
5 NS 3S N = 600 13.2 60.00
6 NS 4P W-1 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.7 Didier Collart -Gerard Cooreman 49,96 %
7 NS 4P W-2 200 16.5 75.00
8 NS 3K N+1 130 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 72,50 %
a.6 Annick Peeters -Neslihan Buharali 55,93 %
9 NS 2K N+4 170 3.4 15.45
10 NS 3S W+2 -660 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 17,95 %
a.5 Noelle Fosse -Marie Christine Remy 55,00 %
11 NS 2TcW = -180 2.3 10.45
12 NS 3S E-2 100 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.4 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 42,65 %
13 NS 4P W+1 -650 4.5 20.45
14 NS 2C N+1 140 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
a.3 Marguerite Verstraeten -Paul Henricot 43,33 %
15 NS 4P W+1 -450 14.3 65.00
16 NS 3T N+1 130 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a.2 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren 53,88 %
17 NS 2P W = -110 7.7 35.00
18 NS 5C S-1 -100 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.1 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 53,20 %
19 NS 4P N+2 480 16.5 75.00
20 NS 4C N+2 680 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
a12 Mado Miller -Catherine de Moffarts 40,93 %
23 NS 4P S = 620 18.6 84.55
24 NS 4C W+1 -450 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
a11 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 55,34 %
25 NS 3S S = 400 11 50.00
26 NS 4P S-1 -100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
Total : 299,2 / 528 = 56,67 %
PAIRE A13 Thierry Goemaere -Myriam de Timary
a12 Mado Miller -Catherine de Moffarts 40,93 %
1 NS 3C W = -140 5.5 25.00
2 NS 4C W-1 50 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
a11 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 55,34 %
3 NS 1S N-2 -100 4.5 20.45
4 NS 2P W-1 100 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a10 Anne France Raquez -Nicolas de Neve 49,07 %
5 NS 3S S+1 630 21.9 99.55
6 NS 4P W-1 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a.9 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Prisca Tondreau 44,53 %
7 NS 2S E+3 -210 4.5 20.45
8 NS 5TcE-2 300 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a.8 Lydia Wildiers -Benoit Ortegat 55,91 %
9 NS 1S S+3 180 7.7 35.00
10 NS 3S W+1 -630 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.7 Didier Collart -Gerard Cooreman 49,96 %
11 NS 3K N-3 -150 4.5 20.45
12 NS 3S E-1 50 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
a.6 Annick Peeters -Neslihan Buharali 55,93 %
13 NS 4P W+1 -650 4.5 20.45
14 NS 2C N-1 -50 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 17,95 %
a.5 Noelle Fosse -Marie Christine Remy 55,00 %
15 NS 4P W = -420 19.7 89.55
16 NS 4S N-1 -50 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.4 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 42,65 %
17 NS 4P W-2 100 20.8 94.55
18 NS 4C N-1 -100 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
a.3 Marguerite Verstraeten -Paul Henricot 43,33 %
19 NS 4P S+2 480 16.5 75.00
20 NS 4C N+2 680 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
a.2 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren 53,88 %
21 NS 3S E-4 200 21 95.45
22 NS 3S E = -600 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a13 - 0,00 %
25 NS BYE 0 0.00
26 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 259,7 / 484 = 53,66 %
PAIRE A.6 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst
a11 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 55,34 %
1 NS 4K E-2 100 19.7 89.55
2 NS 3S E = -400 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a10 Anne France Raquez -Nicolas de Neve 49,07 %
3 NS 2C W+1 -140 2.3 10.45
4 NS 2P W-1 100 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a.9 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Prisca Tondreau 44,53 %
5 NS 4K N = 130 1.2 5.45
6 NS 4P W-2 200 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.8 Lydia Wildiers -Benoit Ortegat 55,91 %
7 NS 4P W-2 200 16.5 75.00
8 NS 3P N = 140 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.6 Annick Peeters -Neslihan Buharali 55,93 %
11 NS 3P N-1 -50 12.1 55.00
12 NS 3S E-1 50 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a.5 Noelle Fosse -Marie Christine Remy 55,00 %
13 NS 4P W = -620 11 50.00
14 NS 1S N-2 -100 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a.4 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 42,65 %
15 NS 4P W+2 -480 4.5 20.45
16 NS 3S N = 400 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a.3 Marguerite Verstraeten -Paul Henricot 43,33 %
17 NS 3P W-2 100 20.8 94.55
18 NS 3P E = -140 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a.2 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren 53,88 %
19 NS 2C S+2 170 0.1 0.45
20 NS 4C N+1 650 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.1 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 53,20 %
21 NS 3K E-2 100 10 45.45
22 NS 3S E-1 100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a13 - 0,00 %
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a12 Mado Miller -Catherine de Moffarts 40,93 %
25 NS 3S N = 400 11 50.00
26 NS 2P S+1 140 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
Total : 247,9 / 484 = 51,22 %
PAIRE A10 Dominique Bourgoignie -Claire Derieuw
a.6 Annick Peeters -Neslihan Buharali 55,93 %
1 NS 4C W-1 50 15.4 70.00
2 NS 3S E+1 -430 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
a.5 Noelle Fosse -Marie Christine Remy 55,00 %
3 NS 1S N = 90 21.9 99.55
4 NS 2P W-2 200 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 94,55 %
a.4 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 42,65 %
5 NS 2S S+1 150 4.5 20.45
6 NS 4K N = 130 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.3 Marguerite Verstraeten -Paul Henricot 43,33 %
7 NS 4P W-2 200 16.5 75.00
8 NS 2TcW+2 -380 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a.2 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren 53,88 %
9 NS 3S S+1 430 15.4 70.00
10 NS 3S E+1 -630 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
a.1 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 53,20 %
11 NS 3T E-1 50 16.5 75.00
12 NS 3S E+1 -430 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a13 - 0,00 %
13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a12 Mado Miller -Catherine de Moffarts 40,93 %
15 NS 4P W+2 -480 4.5 20.45
16 NS 5T N-1 -50 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 12,95 %
a10 Anne France Raquez -Nicolas de Neve 49,07 %
19 NS 4P N+2 480 16.5 75.00
20 NS 3S N = 600 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
a.9 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Prisca Tondreau 44,53 %
21 NS 4K E-2 100 10 45.45
22 NS 3S E-2 200 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a.8 Lydia Wildiers -Benoit Ortegat 55,91 %
23 NS 4P S = 620 18.6 84.55
24 NS 4C W = -420 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
a.7 Didier Collart -Gerard Cooreman 49,96 %
25 NS 3S N = 400 11 50.00
26 NS 3P S-2 -200 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
Total : 245,1 / 484 = 50,64 %
PAIRE A.4 Stan Tabor -Alan Beckman
a.7 Didier Collart -Gerard Cooreman 49,96 %
1 NS 4C E-1 50 15.4 70.00
2 NS 3S E+1 -430 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
a.6 Annick Peeters -Neslihan Buharali 55,93 %
3 NS 3CcW = -730 0.1 0.45
4 NS 4K S-1 -100 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 7,95 %
a.4 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 42,65 %
7 NS 4P W-2 200 16.5 75.00
8 NS 5TcE-2 300 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
a.3 Marguerite Verstraeten -Paul Henricot 43,33 %
9 NS 3S S+1 430 15.4 70.00
10 NS 3S W+1 -630 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
a.2 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren 53,88 %
11 NS 3TcE+1 -570 0.1 0.45
12 NS 3S E = -400 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 12,73 %
a.1 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 53,20 %
13 NS 4P W = -620 11 50.00
14 NS 3C N-1 -50 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a13 - 0,00 %
15 NS BYE 0 0.00
16 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a12 Mado Miller -Catherine de Moffarts 40,93 %
17 NS 3P W-1 50 15.4 70.00
18 NS 4C N-1 -100 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
a11 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 55,34 %
19 NS 6P N = 980 21.9 99.55
20 NS 4C S+2 680 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 92,05 %
a10 Anne France Raquez -Nicolas de Neve 49,07 %
21 NS 2S E-2 100 10 45.45
22 NS 3S E-1 100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a.9 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Prisca Tondreau 44,53 %
23 NS 3P S+1 170 5.5 25.00
24 NS 4C W = -420 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.8 Lydia Wildiers -Benoit Ortegat 55,91 %
25 NS 3S N = 400 11 50.00
26 NS 4P S-1 -100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
Total : 241,6 / 484 = 49,92 %
PAIRE A11 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart
a.8 Lydia Wildiers -Benoit Ortegat 55,91 %
1 NS 2P N-4 -200 2.3 10.45
2 NS 3S E = -400 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a.7 Didier Collart -Gerard Cooreman 49,96 %
3 NS 2P N-1 -50 12.1 55.00
4 NS 2P E-1 100 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.6 Annick Peeters -Neslihan Buharali 55,93 %
5 NS 3S N = 600 13.2 60.00
6 NS 3P W-1 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.5 Noelle Fosse -Marie Christine Remy 55,00 %
7 NS 4P W = -620 2.3 10.45
8 NS 3S S-1 -50 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
a.4 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 42,65 %
9 NS 3S N+1 430 15.4 70.00
10 NS 5S W+1 -690 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
a.3 Marguerite Verstraeten -Paul Henricot 43,33 %
11 NS 3T E-1 50 16.5 75.00
12 NS 3S W-1 50 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
a.2 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren 53,88 %
13 NS 4T W+1 -150 21.9 99.55
14 NS 2C N+1 140 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
a.1 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 53,20 %
15 NS 4P W = -420 19.7 89.55
16 NS 3T N = 110 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
a13 - 0,00 %
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a11 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 55,34 %
21 NS 3K E = -110 1 4.55
22 NS 3S E-1 100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
a10 Anne France Raquez -Nicolas de Neve 49,07 %
23 NS 3P S+1 170 5.5 25.00
24 NS 4C W+1 -450 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
a.9 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Prisca Tondreau 44,53 %
25 NS 3S N = 400 11 50.00
26 NS 4P S-1 -100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
Total : 222,6 / 484 = 45,99 %
PAIRE A.8 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles
a.2 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren 53,88 %
1 NS 5T N-2 -100 8.8 40.00
2 NS 3S E+1 -430 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a.1 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 53,20 %
3 NS 1S S-1 -50 12.1 55.00
4 NS 3P W-2 200 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a13 - 0,00 %
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a12 Mado Miller -Catherine de Moffarts 40,93 %
7 NS 4P W-1 100 7.7 35.00
8 NS 4T E-1 50 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a11 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 55,34 %
9 NS 4S S+1 460 20.8 94.55
10 NS 3S E+1 -630 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a10 Anne France Raquez -Nicolas de Neve 49,07 %
11 NS 4P S-2 -100 8.8 40.00
12 NS 3S E-1 50 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.8 Lydia Wildiers -Benoit Ortegat 55,91 %
15 NS 4P W+1 -450 14.3 65.00
16 NS 3T N+2 150 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a.7 Didier Collart -Gerard Cooreman 49,96 %
17 NS 2P E = -110 7.7 35.00
18 NS 3P E = -140 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 32,50 %
a.6 Annick Peeters -Neslihan Buharali 55,93 %
19 NS 4C N+1 450 6.6 30.00
20 NS 4C N+1 650 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
a.5 Noelle Fosse -Marie Christine Remy 55,00 %
21 NS 3C S-1 -100 5 22.73
22 NS 3S E-1 100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.4 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 42,65 %
23 NS 3P S+1 170 5.5 25.00
24 NS 4C W+1 -450 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
a.3 Marguerite Verstraeten -Paul Henricot 43,33 %
25 NS 3S N = 400 11 50.00
26 NS 4P S-2 -200 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
Total : 219,8 / 484 = 45,41 %
PAIRE A.3 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm
a.5 Noelle Fosse -Marie Christine Remy 55,00 %
1 NS 4C E = -420 0.1 0.45
2 NS 3S E = -400 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a.3 Marguerite Verstraeten -Paul Henricot 43,33 %
5 NS 3S S = 600 13.2 60.00
6 NS 4P W = -620 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
a.2 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren 53,88 %
7 NS 4P W-1 100 7.7 35.00
8 NS 3T E = -110 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a.1 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 53,20 %
9 NS 3K N+2 150 0.1 0.45
10 NS 3S E+1 -630 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a13 - 0,00 %
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a12 Mado Miller -Catherine de Moffarts 40,93 %
13 NS 3P W+1 -170 18.6 84.55
14 NS 2C N+1 140 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a11 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 55,34 %
15 NS 4P W+2 -480 4.5 20.45
16 NS 3T N = 110 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a10 Anne France Raquez -Nicolas de Neve 49,07 %
17 NS 2P W+3 -200 0.1 0.45
18 NS 4P E-1 50 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.9 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Prisca Tondreau 44,53 %
19 NS 4S S+1 460 11 50.00
20 NS 4C N+1 650 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.8 Lydia Wildiers -Benoit Ortegat 55,91 %
21 NS 3K E = -110 1 4.55
22 NS 3S E-1 100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
a.7 Didier Collart -Gerard Cooreman 49,96 %
23 NS 2P S+3 200 13.2 60.00
24 NS 4C W = -420 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 67,50 %
a.6 Annick Peeters -Neslihan Buharali 55,93 %
25 NS 3S N = 400 11 50.00
26 NS 4P S-1 -100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
Total : 198,7 / 484 = 41,05 %
PAIRE A.7 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Michel Lievens
a13 - 0,00 %
1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a12 Mado Miller -Catherine de Moffarts 40,93 %
3 NS 1T N = 70 19.7 89.55
4 NS 4K N-1 -100 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a11 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 55,34 %
5 NS 3K N+1 130 1.2 5.45
6 NS 5TcS-4 -800 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 2,95 %
a10 Anne France Raquez -Nicolas de Neve 49,07 %
7 NS 4P W-2 200 16.5 75.00
8 NS 4T E-1 50 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a.9 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Prisca Tondreau 44,53 %
9 NS 3K N+3 170 3.4 15.45
10 NS 5P E+1 -680 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 12,95 %
a.7 Didier Collart -Gerard Cooreman 49,96 %
13 NS 4P W+2 -680 0.1 0.45
14 NS 2C N+1 140 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a.6 Annick Peeters -Neslihan Buharali 55,93 %
15 NS 3S W+2 -460 11 50.00
16 NS 1S N+3 180 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
a.5 Noelle Fosse -Marie Christine Remy 55,00 %
17 NS 4P E-1 50 15.4 70.00
18 NS 3P E = -140 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.4 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 42,65 %
19 NS 4P N+2 480 16.5 75.00
20 NS 4C N+1 650 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a.3 Marguerite Verstraeten -Paul Henricot 43,33 %
21 NS 3C S-1 -100 5 22.73
22 NS 3S E-2 200 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.2 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren 53,88 %
23 NS 3P S+1 170 5.5 25.00
24 NS 4C W = -420 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.1 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 53,20 %
25 NS 3S N-1 -50 0.1 0.45
26 NS 4P S-2 -200 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 7,95 %
Total : 198,5 / 484 = 41,01 %
PAIRE A.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Christiane Vroninckx
a.1 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 53,20 %
1 NS 2C W+1 -140 5.5 25.00
2 NS 3S E = -400 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a13 - 0,00 %
3 NS BYE 0 0.00
4 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a12 Mado Miller -Catherine de Moffarts 40,93 %
5 NS 3S S = 600 13.2 60.00
6 NS 2P W+1 -140 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
a11 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 55,34 %
7 NS 3S E+2 -660 0.1 0.45
8 NS 6T E-2 100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a10 Anne France Raquez -Nicolas de Neve 49,07 %
9 NS 2S S+2 180 7.7 35.00
10 NS 3S E+1 -630 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.9 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Prisca Tondreau 44,53 %
11 NS 3P S-1 -50 12.1 55.00
12 NS 3S E = -400 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a.8 Lydia Wildiers -Benoit Ortegat 55,91 %
13 NS 4P W+1 -650 4.5 20.45
14 NS 2C N+1 140 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
a.7 Didier Collart -Gerard Cooreman 49,96 %
15 NS 4P W+2 -480 4.5 20.45
16 NS 3T S+1 130 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a.6 Annick Peeters -Neslihan Buharali 55,93 %
17 NS 2P W = -110 7.7 35.00
18 NS 3P E = -140 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 32,50 %
a.5 Noelle Fosse -Marie Christine Remy 55,00 %
19 NS 4C S+1 450 6.6 30.00
20 NS 4C S-1 -100 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
a.4 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 42,65 %
21 NS 4P W-4 200 21 95.45
22 NS 3S E-1 100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a.3 Marguerite Verstraeten -Paul Henricot 43,33 %
23 NS 4P S+2 680 21.9 99.55
24 NS 4PcN-3 -500 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
Total : 195,7 / 484 = 40,43 %
PAIRE a.6 Annick Peeters -Neslihan Buharali
A10 Dominique Bourgoignie -Claire Derieuw 50,64 %
1 EO 4C W-1 50 6.6 30.00
2 EO 3S E+1 -430 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
A.4 Stan Tabor -Alan Beckman 49,92 %
3 EO 3CcW = -730 21.9 99.55
4 EO 4K S-1 -100 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 92,05 %
A11 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 45,99 %
5 EO 3S N = 600 8.8 40.00
6 EO 3P W-1 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A12 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Liliane Baptista 56,67 %
9 EO 2K N+4 170 18.6 84.55
10 EO 3S W+2 -660 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 82,05 %
A.6 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 51,22 %
11 EO 3P N-1 -50 9.9 45.00
12 EO 3S E-1 50 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A13 Thierry Goemaere -Myriam de Timary 53,66 %
13 EO 4P W+1 -650 17.5 79.55
14 EO 2C N-1 -50 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 82,05 %
A.7 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Michel Lievens 41,01 %
15 EO 3S W+2 -460 11 50.00
16 EO 1S N+3 180 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
A.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Christiane Vroninckx 40,43 %
17 EO 2P W = -110 14.3 65.00
18 EO 3P E = -140 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 67,50 %
A.8 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 45,41 %
19 EO 4C N+1 450 15.4 70.00
20 EO 4C N+1 650 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 59,71 %
21 EO 2C N = 110 8 36.36
22 EO 3S E-2 200 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A.9 Grazia Neuenschwander -Sophie Tilemans 57,23 %
23 EO 3P S+1 170 16.5 75.00
24 EO 5C W-1 50 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A.3 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm 41,05 %
25 EO 3S N = 400 11 50.00
26 EO 4P S-1 -100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
Total : 295,3 / 528 = 55,93 %
PAIRE a.8 Lydia Wildiers -Benoit Ortegat
A11 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 45,99 %
1 EO 2P N-4 -200 19.7 89.55
2 EO 3S E = -400 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A.5 Christiane Huby -Michele Berrier 56,74 %
3 EO 1S S-1 -50 9.9 45.00
4 EO 2P W = -110 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A12 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Liliane Baptista 56,67 %
5 EO 3S N = 600 8.8 40.00
6 EO 4P W-1 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.6 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 51,22 %
7 EO 4P W-2 200 5.5 25.00
8 EO 3P N = 140 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A13 Thierry Goemaere -Myriam de Timary 53,66 %
9 EO 1S S+3 180 14.3 65.00
10 EO 3S W+1 -630 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Christiane Vroninckx 40,43 %
13 EO 4P W+1 -650 17.5 79.55
14 EO 2C N+1 140 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
A.8 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 45,41 %
15 EO 4P W+1 -450 7.7 35.00
16 EO 3T N+2 150 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 59,71 %
17 EO 2P W+1 -140 19.7 89.55
18 EO 2P E+2 -170 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 94,55 %
A.9 Grazia Neuenschwander -Sophie Tilemans 57,23 %
19 EO 3C S+2 200 19.7 89.55
20 EO 3S N+1 630 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 84,55 %
A.3 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm 41,05 %
21 EO 3K E = -110 21 95.45
22 EO 3S E-1 100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
A10 Dominique Bourgoignie -Claire Derieuw 50,64 %
23 EO 4P S = 620 3.4 15.45
24 EO 4C W = -420 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
A.4 Stan Tabor -Alan Beckman 49,92 %
25 EO 3S N = 400 11 50.00
26 EO 4P S-1 -100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
Total : 295,2 / 528 = 55,91 %
PAIRE a11 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont
A.6 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 51,22 %
1 EO 4K E-2 100 2.3 10.45
2 EO 3S E = -400 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A13 Thierry Goemaere -Myriam de Timary 53,66 %
3 EO 1S N-2 -100 17.5 79.55
4 EO 2P W-1 100 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A.7 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Michel Lievens 41,01 %
5 EO 3K N+1 130 20.8 94.55
6 EO 5TcS-4 -800 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 97,05 %
A.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Christiane Vroninckx 40,43 %
7 EO 3S E+2 -660 21.9 99.55
8 EO 6T E-2 100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A.8 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 45,41 %
9 EO 4S S+1 460 1.2 5.45
10 EO 3S E+1 -630 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 59,71 %
11 EO 4TcE-2 300 0.1 0.45
12 EO 3S E = -400 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A.9 Grazia Neuenschwander -Sophie Tilemans 57,23 %
13 EO 4P W = -620 11 50.00
14 EO 2C N+1 140 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A.3 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm 41,05 %
15 EO 4P W+2 -480 17.5 79.55
16 EO 3T N = 110 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.4 Stan Tabor -Alan Beckman 49,92 %
19 EO 6P N = 980 0.1 0.45
20 EO 4C S+2 680 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 7,95 %
A11 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 45,99 %
21 EO 3K E = -110 21 95.45
22 EO 3S E-1 100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
A.5 Christiane Huby -Michele Berrier 56,74 %
23 EO 3P S+1 170 16.5 75.00
24 EO 4CcW = -590 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 87,27 %
A12 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Liliane Baptista 56,67 %
25 EO 3S S = 400 11 50.00
26 EO 4P S-1 -100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
Total : 292,2 / 528 = 55,34 %
PAIRE a.5 Noelle Fosse -Marie Christine Remy
A.3 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm 41,05 %
1 EO 4C E = -420 21.9 99.55
2 EO 3S E = -400 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A10 Dominique Bourgoignie -Claire Derieuw 50,64 %
3 EO 1S N = 90 0.1 0.45
4 EO 2P W-2 200 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 5,45 %
A11 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 45,99 %
7 EO 4P W = -620 19.7 89.55
8 EO 3S S-1 -50 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
A.5 Christiane Huby -Michele Berrier 56,74 %
9 EO 3S S+2 460 1.2 5.45
10 EO 5P E-2 200 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 2,95 %
A12 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Liliane Baptista 56,67 %
11 EO 2TcW = -180 19.7 89.55
12 EO 3S E-2 100 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.6 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 51,22 %
13 EO 4P W = -620 11 50.00
14 EO 1S N-2 -100 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A13 Thierry Goemaere -Myriam de Timary 53,66 %
15 EO 4P W = -420 2.3 10.45
16 EO 4S N-1 -50 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.7 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Michel Lievens 41,01 %
17 EO 4P E-1 50 6.6 30.00
18 EO 3P E = -140 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Christiane Vroninckx 40,43 %
19 EO 4C S+1 450 15.4 70.00
20 EO 4C S-1 -100 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
A.8 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 45,41 %
21 EO 3C S-1 -100 17 77.27
22 EO 3S E-1 100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 59,71 %
23 EO 3P S+3 230 6.6 30.00
24 EO 5C W = -450 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.9 Grazia Neuenschwander -Sophie Tilemans 57,23 %
25 EO 3S N = 400 11 50.00
26 EO 4C S-2 -200 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
Total : 290,4 / 528 = 55,00 %
PAIRE a.2 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren
A.8 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 45,41 %
1 EO 5T N-2 -100 13.2 60.00
2 EO 3S E+1 -430 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 59,71 %
3 EO 1S N-1 -50 9.9 45.00
4 EO 2P W-1 100 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.9 Grazia Neuenschwander -Sophie Tilemans 57,23 %
5 EO 3S S = 600 8.8 40.00
6 EO 5P W-3 300 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
A.3 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm 41,05 %
7 EO 4P W-1 100 14.3 65.00
8 EO 3T E = -110 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A10 Dominique Bourgoignie -Claire Derieuw 50,64 %
9 EO 3S S+1 430 6.6 30.00
10 EO 3S E+1 -630 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
A.4 Stan Tabor -Alan Beckman 49,92 %
11 EO 3TcE+1 -570 21.9 99.55
12 EO 3S E = -400 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 87,27 %
A11 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 45,99 %
13 EO 4T W+1 -150 0.1 0.45
14 EO 2C N+1 140 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
A.5 Christiane Huby -Michele Berrier 56,74 %
15 EO 4P W+2 -480 17.5 79.55
16 EO 3T N+1 130 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A12 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Liliane Baptista 56,67 %
17 EO 2P W = -110 14.3 65.00
18 EO 5C S-1 -100 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.6 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 51,22 %
19 EO 2C S+2 170 21.9 99.55
20 EO 4C N+1 650 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A13 Thierry Goemaere -Myriam de Timary 53,66 %
21 EO 3S E-4 200 1 4.55
22 EO 3S E = -600 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.7 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Michel Lievens 41,01 %
23 EO 3P S+1 170 16.5 75.00
24 EO 4C W = -420 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 284,5 / 528 = 53,88 %
PAIRE a.1 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen
A.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Christiane Vroninckx 40,43 %
1 EO 2C W+1 -140 16.5 75.00
2 EO 3S E = -400 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A.8 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 45,41 %
3 EO 1S S-1 -50 9.9 45.00
4 EO 3P W-2 200 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 59,71 %
5 EO 3S N = 600 8.8 40.00
6 EO 4P W-1 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.9 Grazia Neuenschwander -Sophie Tilemans 57,23 %
7 EO 4P W-2 200 5.5 25.00
8 EO 5K N-3 -150 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
A.3 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm 41,05 %
9 EO 3K N+2 150 21.9 99.55
10 EO 3S E+1 -630 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A10 Dominique Bourgoignie -Claire Derieuw 50,64 %
11 EO 3T E-1 50 5.5 25.00
12 EO 3S E+1 -430 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A.4 Stan Tabor -Alan Beckman 49,92 %
13 EO 4P W = -620 11 50.00
14 EO 3C N-1 -50 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A11 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 45,99 %
15 EO 4P W = -420 2.3 10.45
16 EO 3T N = 110 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
A.5 Christiane Huby -Michele Berrier 56,74 %
17 EO 2P W = -110 14.3 65.00
18 EO 4C N = 620 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A12 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Liliane Baptista 56,67 %
19 EO 4P N+2 480 5.5 25.00
20 EO 4C N+2 680 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
A.6 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 51,22 %
21 EO 3K E-2 100 12 54.55
22 EO 3S E-1 100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A.7 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Michel Lievens 41,01 %
25 EO 3S N-1 -50 21.9 99.55
26 EO 4P S-2 -200 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 92,05 %
Total : 280,9 / 528 = 53,20 %
PAIRE a.7 Didier Collart -Gerard Cooreman
A.4 Stan Tabor -Alan Beckman 49,92 %
1 EO 4C E-1 50 6.6 30.00
2 EO 3S E+1 -430 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
A11 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 45,99 %
3 EO 2P N-1 -50 9.9 45.00
4 EO 2P E-1 100 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.5 Christiane Huby -Michele Berrier 56,74 %
5 EO 3S N = 600 8.8 40.00
6 EO 4P W-1 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A12 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Liliane Baptista 56,67 %
7 EO 4P W-2 200 5.5 25.00
8 EO 3K N+1 130 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 27,50 %
A13 Thierry Goemaere -Myriam de Timary 53,66 %
11 EO 3K N-3 -150 17.5 79.55
12 EO 3S E-1 50 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
A.7 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Michel Lievens 41,01 %
13 EO 4P W+2 -680 21.9 99.55
14 EO 2C N+1 140 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Christiane Vroninckx 40,43 %
15 EO 4P W+2 -480 17.5 79.55
16 EO 3T S+1 130 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A.8 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 45,41 %
17 EO 2P E = -110 14.3 65.00
18 EO 3P E = -140 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 67,50 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 59,71 %
19 EO 5C S = 450 15.4 70.00
20 EO 4C N+2 680 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
A.9 Grazia Neuenschwander -Sophie Tilemans 57,23 %
21 EO 3C S = 140 5 22.73
22 EO 3S E-2 200 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
A.3 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm 41,05 %
23 EO 2P S+3 200 8.8 40.00
24 EO 4C W = -420 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 32,50 %
A10 Dominique Bourgoignie -Claire Derieuw 50,64 %
25 EO 3S N = 400 11 50.00
26 EO 3P S-2 -200 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
Total : 263,8 / 528 = 49,96 %
PAIRE a10 Anne France Raquez -Nicolas de Neve
A12 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Liliane Baptista 56,67 %
1 EO 4C W-1 50 6.6 30.00
2 EO 3S E = -400 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
A.6 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 51,22 %
3 EO 2C W+1 -140 19.7 89.55
4 EO 2P W-1 100 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A13 Thierry Goemaere -Myriam de Timary 53,66 %
5 EO 3S S+1 630 0.1 0.45
6 EO 4P W-1 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A.7 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Michel Lievens 41,01 %
7 EO 4P W-2 200 5.5 25.00
8 EO 4T E-1 50 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Christiane Vroninckx 40,43 %
9 EO 2S S+2 180 14.3 65.00
10 EO 3S E+1 -630 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.8 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 45,41 %
11 EO 4P S-2 -100 13.2 60.00
12 EO 3S E-1 50 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 59,71 %
13 EO 3P W+1 -170 3.4 15.45
14 EO 3C N = 140 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A.3 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm 41,05 %
17 EO 2P W+3 -200 21.9 99.55
18 EO 4P E-1 50 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A10 Dominique Bourgoignie -Claire Derieuw 50,64 %
19 EO 4P N+2 480 5.5 25.00
20 EO 3S N = 600 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
A.4 Stan Tabor -Alan Beckman 49,92 %
21 EO 2S E-2 100 12 54.55
22 EO 3S E-1 100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A11 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 45,99 %
23 EO 3P S+1 170 16.5 75.00
24 EO 4C W+1 -450 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
A.5 Christiane Huby -Michele Berrier 56,74 %
25 EO 3S N = 400 11 50.00
26 EO 4P S-1 -100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
Total : 259,1 / 528 = 49,07 %
PAIRE a.9 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Prisca Tondreau
A.5 Christiane Huby -Michele Berrier 56,74 %
1 EO 3T N+2 150 0.1 0.45
2 EO 3S E-1 50 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 2,95 %
A12 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Liliane Baptista 56,67 %
3 EO 2P S-1 -50 9.9 45.00
4 EO 2P W-2 200 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A.6 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 51,22 %
5 EO 4K N = 130 20.8 94.55
6 EO 4P W-2 200 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A13 Thierry Goemaere -Myriam de Timary 53,66 %
7 EO 2S E+3 -210 17.5 79.55
8 EO 5TcE-2 300 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A.7 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Michel Lievens 41,01 %
9 EO 3K N+3 170 18.6 84.55
10 EO 5P E+1 -680 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 87,05 %
A.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Christiane Vroninckx 40,43 %
11 EO 3P S-1 -50 9.9 45.00
12 EO 3S E = -400 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 59,71 %
15 EO 4P W = -420 2.3 10.45
16 EO 3T N+1 130 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A.9 Grazia Neuenschwander -Sophie Tilemans 57,23 %
17 EO 3K E-1 50 6.6 30.00
18 EO 3P E = -140 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.3 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm 41,05 %
19 EO 4S S+1 460 11 50.00
20 EO 4C N+1 650 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A10 Dominique Bourgoignie -Claire Derieuw 50,64 %
21 EO 4K E-2 100 12 54.55
22 EO 3S E-2 200 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.4 Stan Tabor -Alan Beckman 49,92 %
23 EO 3P S+1 170 16.5 75.00
24 EO 4C W = -420 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A11 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 45,99 %
25 EO 3S N = 400 11 50.00
26 EO 4P S-1 -100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
Total : 235,1 / 528 = 44,53 %
PAIRE a.3 Marguerite Verstraeten -Paul Henricot
A.9 Grazia Neuenschwander -Sophie Tilemans 57,23 %
3 EO 1S S-1 -50 9.9 45.00
4 EO 3T S = 110 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
A.3 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm 41,05 %
5 EO 3S S = 600 8.8 40.00
6 EO 4P W = -620 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A10 Dominique Bourgoignie -Claire Derieuw 50,64 %
7 EO 4P W-2 200 5.5 25.00
8 EO 2TcW+2 -380 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A.4 Stan Tabor -Alan Beckman 49,92 %
9 EO 3S S+1 430 6.6 30.00
10 EO 3S W+1 -630 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
A11 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 45,99 %
11 EO 3T E-1 50 5.5 25.00
12 EO 3S W-1 50 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
A.5 Christiane Huby -Michele Berrier 56,74 %
13 EO 3P W+2 -200 6.6 30.00
14 EO 2C N+1 140 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 32,50 %
A12 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Liliane Baptista 56,67 %
15 EO 4P W+1 -450 7.7 35.00
16 EO 3T N+1 130 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A.6 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 51,22 %
17 EO 3P W-2 100 1.2 5.45
18 EO 3P E = -140 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A13 Thierry Goemaere -Myriam de Timary 53,66 %
19 EO 4P S+2 480 5.5 25.00
20 EO 4C N+2 680 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
A.7 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Michel Lievens 41,01 %
21 EO 3C S-1 -100 17 77.27
22 EO 3S E-2 200 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Christiane Vroninckx 40,43 %
23 EO 4P S+2 680 0.1 0.45
24 EO 4PcN-3 -500 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.8 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 45,41 %
25 EO 3S N = 400 11 50.00
26 EO 4P S-2 -200 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
Total : 228,8 / 528 = 43,33 %
PAIRE a.4 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
A.9 Grazia Neuenschwander -Sophie Tilemans 57,23 %
1 EO 5T N-1 -50 11 50.00
2 EO 3S E = -400 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A10 Dominique Bourgoignie -Claire Derieuw 50,64 %
5 EO 2S S+1 150 17.5 79.55
6 EO 4K N = 130 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.4 Stan Tabor -Alan Beckman 49,92 %
7 EO 4P W-2 200 5.5 25.00
8 EO 5TcE-2 300 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
A11 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 45,99 %
9 EO 3S N+1 430 6.6 30.00
10 EO 5S W+1 -690 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A.5 Christiane Huby -Michele Berrier 56,74 %
11 EO 3T E = -110 15.4 70.00
12 EO 3S E = -400 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 72,50 %
A12 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Liliane Baptista 56,67 %
13 EO 4P W+1 -650 17.5 79.55
14 EO 2C N+1 140 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
A.6 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 51,22 %
15 EO 4P W+2 -480 17.5 79.55
16 EO 3S N = 400 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A13 Thierry Goemaere -Myriam de Timary 53,66 %
17 EO 4P W-2 100 1.2 5.45
18 EO 4C N-1 -100 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
A.7 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Michel Lievens 41,01 %
19 EO 4P N+2 480 5.5 25.00
20 EO 4C N+1 650 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Christiane Vroninckx 40,43 %
21 EO 4P W-4 200 1 4.55
22 EO 3S E-1 100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.8 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 45,41 %
23 EO 3P S+1 170 16.5 75.00
24 EO 4C W+1 -450 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 59,71 %
25 EO 3S S+1 430 0.1 0.45
26 EO 4P S = 620 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 0,45 %
Total : 225,2 / 528 = 42,65 %
PAIRE a12 Mado Miller -Catherine de Moffarts
A13 Thierry Goemaere -Myriam de Timary 53,66 %
1 EO 3C W = -140 16.5 75.00
2 EO 4C W-1 50 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
A.7 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Michel Lievens 41,01 %
3 EO 1T N = 70 2.3 10.45
4 EO 4K N-1 -100 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Christiane Vroninckx 40,43 %
5 EO 3S S = 600 8.8 40.00
6 EO 2P W+1 -140 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
A.8 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 45,41 %
7 EO 4P W-1 100 14.3 65.00
8 EO 4T E-1 50 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 59,71 %
9 EO 2S S+3 210 11 50.00
10 EO 3S E+1 -630 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.9 Grazia Neuenschwander -Sophie Tilemans 57,23 %
11 EO 3P N = 140 2.3 10.45
12 EO 3S E-3 150 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 5,45 %
A.3 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm 41,05 %
13 EO 3P W+1 -170 3.4 15.45
14 EO 2C N+1 140 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A10 Dominique Bourgoignie -Claire Derieuw 50,64 %
15 EO 4P W+2 -480 17.5 79.55
16 EO 5T N-1 -50 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 87,05 %
A.4 Stan Tabor -Alan Beckman 49,92 %
17 EO 3P W-1 50 6.6 30.00
18 EO 4C N-1 -100 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
A.5 Christiane Huby -Michele Berrier 56,74 %
21 EO 2C S+1 140 5 22.73
22 EO 3S E-2 200 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
A12 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Liliane Baptista 56,67 %
23 EO 4P S = 620 3.4 15.45
24 EO 4C W+1 -450 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
A.6 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 51,22 %
25 EO 3S N = 400 11 50.00
26 EO 2P S+1 140 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
Total : 216,1 / 528 = 40,93 %
PAIRE a13 -
A.7 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Michel Lievens 41,01 %
1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Christiane Vroninckx 40,43 %
3 EO BYE 0 0.00
4 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.8 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 45,41 %
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 59,71 %
7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.9 Grazia Neuenschwander -Sophie Tilemans 57,23 %
9 EO BYE 0 0.00
10 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.3 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm 41,05 %
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A10 Dominique Bourgoignie -Claire Derieuw 50,64 %
13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.4 Stan Tabor -Alan Beckman 49,92 %
15 EO BYE 0 0.00
16 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A11 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 45,99 %
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.5 Christiane Huby -Michele Berrier 56,74 %
19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.6 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 51,22 %
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A13 Thierry Goemaere -Myriam de Timary 53,66 %
25 EO BYE 0 0.00
26 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 572 = 0,00 %
|