B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 59,23 N.4 Alan Beckman -Hugo Baetens
--- 2 56,25 N.6 Chris Oostens -Jeanine Bontemps
--- 3 55,18 N.8 Philippe van der Gracht -Thierry Bollansee
--- 4 51,90 N.1 Daniel Couvreur -Anne Brans
--- 5 50,12 N10 Nathalie de Laminne -Chantal de Lichtervelde
--- 6 49,40 N.7 Diane Deslignes -Lydia Luyten
--- 7 48,93 N11 Myriam de Timary -Colette Heerinckx
--- 8 46,70 N.3 Teresa Dekoster -Michel Lievens
--- 9 45,06 N.9 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans
--- 10 43,75 N.5 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin
--- 11 43,45 N.2 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 62,80 e.5 Pascale Ortegat -Benoit Ortegat
--- 2 60,71 e11 Dominique Sassen -Christiane Huby
--- 3 59,23 e.7 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor
--- 4 58,51 e.8 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle
--- 5 50,89 e.1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
--- 6 46,61 e10 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes
--- 7 43,63 e.6 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck
--- 8 43,04 e.2 Didier Collart -Catherine de Moffarts
--- 9 43,04 e.4 Mado Miller -Ghislaine Deschuyteneer
--- 10 42,86 e.9 Benedicte Lemaigre -Diane de Behault
--- 11 38,72 e.3 Patricia Bardy -Patrizia Vaccani
PAIRE N.4 Alan Beckman -Hugo Baetens
e.4 Mado Miller -Ghislaine Deschuyteneer 43,04 %
10 NS 4P E-1 100 11 78.57
11 NS 3PcW-2 300 14 100.00
12 NS 2T E+2 -130 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 78,57 %
e.3 Patricia Bardy -Patrizia Vaccani 38,72 %
13 NS 3S N-1 -100 6 42.86
14 NS 6P E-1 50 14 100.00
15 NS 3S E-1 50 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
e.2 Didier Collart -Catherine de Moffarts 43,04 %
16 NS 4P S = 420 11 78.57
17 NS 3PcE-2 300 6 42.86
18 NS 2S E-1 50 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
e.1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 50,89 %
19 NS 3S W-1 100 9 64.29
20 NS 3S S+1 630 8 57.14
21 NS 3S W-1 50 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
e11 Dominique Sassen -Christiane Huby 60,71 %
22 NS 3S N-1 -50 5 35.71
23 NS 4P W+1 -650 0 0.00
24 NS 4TcW-2 300 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
e10 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 46,61 %
25 NS 2K W+3 -150 10 71.43
26 NS 6S N = 1440 14 100.00
27 NS 3S N-1 -50 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
e.9 Benedicte Lemaigre -Diane de Behault 42,86 %
28 NS 4P N-1 -100 1 7.14
29 NS 4P N+1 650 8 57.14
30 NS 4C E-2 100 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
e.8 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 58,51 %
31 NS 3P N-3 -300 0 0.00
32 NS 2C S+2 170 11 78.57
33 NS 3CcW = -530 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
Total : 199,0 / 336 = 59,23 %
PAIRE N.6 Chris Oostens -Jeanine Bontemps
e11 Dominique Sassen -Christiane Huby 60,71 %
1 NS 2T N = 90 6 42.86
2 NS 4C S+2 680 10 71.43
3 NS 4TcS-2 -300 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
e10 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 46,61 %
4 NS 2C W+1 -140 0 0.00
5 NS 3P W+3 -230 14 100.00
6 NS 3P N = 140 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
e.6 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 43,63 %
16 NS 4P S = 420 11 78.57
17 NS 4K N+2 170 3 21.43
18 NS 1S N-1 -100 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
e.5 Pascale Ortegat -Benoit Ortegat 62,80 %
19 NS 3S W-3 300 13 92.86
20 NS 3S S = 600 2 14.29
21 NS 3S W+1 -430 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
e.4 Mado Miller -Ghislaine Deschuyteneer 43,04 %
22 NS 4P N-1 -50 5 35.71
23 NS 4P W-2 200 13 92.86
24 NS 3S N-1 -50 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
e.3 Patricia Bardy -Patrizia Vaccani 38,72 %
25 NS 5K W = -600 6 42.86
26 NS 3S S+3 690 8 57.14
27 NS 3K S = 110 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
e.2 Didier Collart -Catherine de Moffarts 43,04 %
28 NS 4P N = 620 12 85.71
29 NS 4P N+1 650 8 57.14
30 NS 3C E-2 100 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
e.1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 50,89 %
31 NS 2S W-2 100 13 92.86
32 NS 2C S+2 170 11 78.57
33 NS 4T N = 130 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 85,71 %
Total : 189,0 / 336 = 56,25 %
PAIRE N.8 Philippe van der Gracht -Thierry Bollansee
e.4 Mado Miller -Ghislaine Deschuyteneer 43,04 %
1 NS 1S N-1 -50 1 7.14
2 NS 4C S+2 680 10 71.43
3 NS 4P E-2 200 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
e.3 Patricia Bardy -Patrizia Vaccani 38,72 %
4 NS 5K S+1 620 13 92.86
5 NS 4P W+2 -480 6 42.86
6 NS 3P N = 140 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
e.2 Didier Collart -Catherine de Moffarts 43,04 %
7 NS 3S S-2 -200 2.4 17.14
8 NS 1S N+1 120 12 85.71
9 NS 3C W-2 200 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 67,62 %
e.1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 50,89 %
10 NS 4P E = -620 2 14.29
11 NS 3C W-2 100 10 71.43
12 NS 4T E+1 -150 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
e.8 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 58,51 %
22 NS 3S S = 400 12 85.71
23 NS 2P W+2 -170 6 42.86
24 NS 3C S-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
e.7 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 59,23 %
25 NS 3S W+2 -660 0 0.00
26 NS 6P S = 1430 12 85.71
27 NS 3K S = 110 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
e.6 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 43,63 %
28 NS 4P N = 620 12 85.71
29 NS 4P N+1 650 8 57.14
30 NS 3K S = 110 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 80,95 %
e.5 Pascale Ortegat -Benoit Ortegat 62,80 %
31 NS 2S W = -120 4 28.57
32 NS 2C S = 110 4 28.57
33 NS 3C W-2 100 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
Total : 185,4 / 336 = 55,18 %
PAIRE N.1 Daniel Couvreur -Anne Brans
e.1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 50,89 %
1 NS 1S N-1 -50 1 7.14
2 NS 4C S+2 680 10 71.43
3 NS 3P E-1 100 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
e11 Dominique Sassen -Christiane Huby 60,71 %
4 NS 4K S+2 170 5 35.71
5 NS 4P W+2 -480 6 42.86
6 NS 3P N = 140 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
e10 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 46,61 %
7 NS 3S S = 600 10.4 74.29
8 NS 3P E-2 100 8 57.14
9 NS 3T N-2 -100 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 62,86 %
e.9 Benedicte Lemaigre -Diane de Behault 42,86 %
10 NS 4P E-1 100 11 78.57
11 NS 5T S-1 -50 8 57.14
12 NS 3C E = -140 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
e.8 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 58,51 %
13 NS 3K S+1 130 12 85.71
14 NS 4P E+1 -450 11 78.57
15 NS 3T W+2 -150 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
e.7 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 59,23 %
16 NS 4P S-1 -50 2 14.29
17 NS 5K N+2 440 10 71.43
18 NS 2K E+1 -110 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
e.6 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 43,63 %
19 NS 3K W = -110 5 35.71
20 NS 3S S+1 630 8 57.14
21 NS 3K E-1 50 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
e.5 Pascale Ortegat -Benoit Ortegat 62,80 %
22 NS 3S S-1 -50 5 35.71
23 NS 4P W = -620 3 21.43
24 NS 2P S = 110 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
Total : 174,4 / 336 = 51,90 %
PAIRE N10 Nathalie de Laminne -Chantal de Lichtervelde
e.8 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 58,51 %
1 NS 2T N+1 110 10 71.43
2 NS 2C S+4 230 3 21.43
3 NS 3P E-1 100 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
e.7 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 59,23 %
4 NS 2K S+4 170 5 35.71
5 NS 4P W+2 -480 6 42.86
6 NS 3C E = -140 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
e.6 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 43,63 %
7 NS 3S S = 600 10.4 74.29
8 NS 2P E-1 50 3 21.43
9 NS 3K S-1 -50 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 58,10 %
e.5 Pascale Ortegat -Benoit Ortegat 62,80 %
10 NS 4P E-1 100 11 78.57
11 NS 2P W+1 -140 5 35.71
12 NS 3T E+2 -150 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
e.4 Mado Miller -Ghislaine Deschuyteneer 43,04 %
13 NS 3K S = 110 10 71.43
14 NS 6P E+1 -1010 1 7.14
15 NS 3S W-1 50 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
e.3 Patricia Bardy -Patrizia Vaccani 38,72 %
16 NS 4P S-1 -50 2 14.29
17 NS 5K N+2 440 10 71.43
18 NS 1S E-1 50 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
e10 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 46,61 %
28 NS 4P N = 620 12 85.71
29 NS 2P N+3 200 0 0.00
30 NS 3C E-1 50 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
e.9 Benedicte Lemaigre -Diane de Behault 42,86 %
31 NS 2S W-2 100 13 92.86
32 NS 2C S+1 140 7 50.00
33 NS 2P S-1 -50 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
Total : 168,4 / 336 = 50,12 %
PAIRE N.7 Diane Deslignes -Lydia Luyten
e.2 Didier Collart -Catherine de Moffarts 43,04 %
1 NS 1S W-1 50 4 28.57
2 NS 4C S+2 680 10 71.43
3 NS 2P E+1 -140 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
e.1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 50,89 %
4 NS 5K S+1 620 13 92.86
5 NS 4P W+2 -480 6 42.86
6 NS 4P N-1 -50 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
e11 Dominique Sassen -Christiane Huby 60,71 %
7 NS 50%50% Ajust 7 50.00
8 NS 1S N-1 -50 0 0.00
9 NS 3TcN-2 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
e.7 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 59,23 %
19 NS 3S W-3 300 13 92.86
20 NS 3S S+1 630 8 57.14
21 NS 3S W+1 -430 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
e.6 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 43,63 %
22 NS 3P N = 140 10 71.43
23 NS 4P W-1 100 9 64.29
24 NS 1S W-1 50 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
e.5 Pascale Ortegat -Benoit Ortegat 62,80 %
25 NS 5T E = -600 6 42.86
26 NS 5P S = 650 1 7.14
27 NS 1S N = 90 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
e.4 Mado Miller -Ghislaine Deschuyteneer 43,04 %
28 NS 3P N+1 170 8 57.14
29 NS 4P N+1 650 8 57.14
30 NS 3K S-1 -50 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
e.3 Patricia Bardy -Patrizia Vaccani 38,72 %
31 NS 2S W-1 50 9 64.29
32 NS 4C S = 420 14 100.00
33 NS 3T N+1 130 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
Total : 166,0 / 336 = 49,40 %
PAIRE N11 Myriam de Timary -Colette Heerinckx
e10 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 46,61 %
1 NS 2T N+1 110 10 71.43
2 NS 3C S+3 230 3 21.43
3 NS 2P E = -110 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
e.9 Benedicte Lemaigre -Diane de Behault 42,86 %
4 NS 3C W-2 200 9 64.29
5 NS 4P W+2 -480 6 42.86
6 NS 4C E-2 200 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
e.8 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 58,51 %
7 NS 3ScS-1 -200 2.4 17.14
8 NS 1S N+1 120 12 85.71
9 NS 2C E+1 -140 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 41,43 %
e.7 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 59,23 %
10 NS 4P E = -620 2 14.29
11 NS 3P E = -140 5 35.71
12 NS 4C E-2 100 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
e.6 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 43,63 %
13 NS 4K S-1 -100 6 42.86
14 NS 5P W = -450 11 78.57
15 NS 3T W+1 -130 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
e.5 Pascale Ortegat -Benoit Ortegat 62,80 %
16 NS 4P S = 420 11 78.57
17 NS 4CcS-2 -300 0 0.00
18 NS 1S E = -90 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
e.4 Mado Miller -Ghislaine Deschuyteneer 43,04 %
19 NS 3S W = -600 1 7.14
20 NS 3S S+1 630 8 57.14
21 NS 3K E-1 50 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
e11 Dominique Sassen -Christiane Huby 60,71 %
31 NS 2S W = -120 4 28.57
32 NS 1S W+1 -120 0 0.00
33 NS 3T N+1 130 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
Total : 164,4 / 336 = 48,93 %
PAIRE N.3 Teresa Dekoster -Michel Lievens
e.3 Patricia Bardy -Patrizia Vaccani 38,72 %
7 NS 3S S+1 630 13.9 99.29
8 NS 1S N = 90 6 42.86
9 NS 1C W+2 -140 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 54,52 %
e.2 Didier Collart -Catherine de Moffarts 43,04 %
10 NS 3P E+1 -170 6 42.86
11 NS 2P W+2 -170 1 7.14
12 NS 3P N-1 -100 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
e.1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 50,89 %
13 NS 3S N-1 -100 6 42.86
14 NS 6P E = -980 5 35.71
15 NS 3S W+1 -430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
e11 Dominique Sassen -Christiane Huby 60,71 %
16 NS 2P S+2 170 6 42.86
17 NS 5K N+2 440 10 71.43
18 NS 1S E+1 -120 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
e10 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 46,61 %
19 NS 3K W-1 100 9 64.29
20 NS 3S S+2 660 14 100.00
21 NS 3S W = -400 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
e.9 Benedicte Lemaigre -Diane de Behault 42,86 %
22 NS 3S N-1 -50 5 35.71
23 NS 4P W-1 100 9 64.29
24 NS 1S N = 90 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
e.8 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 58,51 %
25 NS 5T E = -600 6 42.86
26 NS 3S S+3 690 8 57.14
27 NS 2S N-1 -50 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
e.7 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 59,23 %
28 NS 5TcE-1 100 5 35.71
29 NS 4P N+1 650 8 57.14
30 NS 3C E-1 50 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
Total : 156,9 / 336 = 46,70 %
PAIRE N.9 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans
e.6 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 43,63 %
1 NS 2T N+1 110 10 71.43
2 NS 3C N+2 200 0 0.00
3 NS 3P E-1 100 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
e.5 Pascale Ortegat -Benoit Ortegat 62,80 %
4 NS 3C W-1 100 2 14.29
5 NS 4P W+2 -480 6 42.86
6 NS 3P N = 140 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
e.4 Mado Miller -Ghislaine Deschuyteneer 43,04 %
7 NS 3S S-2 -200 2.4 17.14
8 NS 1S N+1 120 12 85.71
9 NS 2C W = -110 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 48,57 %
e.3 Patricia Bardy -Patrizia Vaccani 38,72 %
10 NS 4P E-1 100 11 78.57
11 NS 2P W+2 -170 1 7.14
12 NS 3T E+1 -130 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
e.2 Didier Collart -Catherine de Moffarts 43,04 %
13 NS 4K S-2 -200 0 0.00
14 NS 5P E+2 -510 8 57.14
15 NS 5T W-1 50 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
e.9 Benedicte Lemaigre -Diane de Behault 42,86 %
25 NS 3S E-1 100 14 100.00
26 NS 4P S+1 650 1 7.14
27 NS 2K S+2 130 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
e.8 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 58,51 %
28 NS 4P N-1 -100 1 7.14
29 NS 4P N+1 650 8 57.14
30 NS 3C E = -140 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
e.7 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 59,23 %
31 NS 2S W-1 50 9 64.29
32 NS 4C S-1 -50 2 14.29
33 NS 2C W+1 -140 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
Total : 151,4 / 336 = 45,06 %
PAIRE N.5 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin
e.9 Benedicte Lemaigre -Diane de Behault 42,86 %
1 NS 1S W-3 150 14 100.00
2 NS 4C S+2 680 10 71.43
3 NS 4P E = -620 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
e.5 Pascale Ortegat -Benoit Ortegat 62,80 %
13 NS 2P W = -110 2 14.29
14 NS 6P E+1 -1010 1 7.14
15 NS 3S W = -400 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 11,90 %
e.4 Mado Miller -Ghislaine Deschuyteneer 43,04 %
16 NS 4P S = 420 11 78.57
17 NS 3S N+2 460 14 100.00
18 NS 2P S-1 -100 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
e.3 Patricia Bardy -Patrizia Vaccani 38,72 %
19 NS 3K W = -110 5 35.71
20 NS 3S S+1 630 8 57.14
21 NS 3K E = -110 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
e.2 Didier Collart -Catherine de Moffarts 43,04 %
22 NS 3S N+1 430 14 100.00
23 NS 4P W-2 200 13 92.86
24 NS 2S N-1 -50 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
e.1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 50,89 %
25 NS 5K W+1 -620 2 14.29
26 NS 4S S+2 690 8 57.14
27 NS 2S N-1 -50 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
e11 Dominique Sassen -Christiane Huby 60,71 %
28 NS 5TcE-1 100 5 35.71
29 NS 4P N+1 650 8 57.14
30 NS 3C E = -140 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
e10 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 46,61 %
31 NS 2S W = -120 4 28.57
32 NS 3C S = 140 7 50.00
33 NS 3CcW = -530 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
Total : 147,0 / 336 = 43,75 %
PAIRE N.2 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren
e.2 Didier Collart -Catherine de Moffarts 43,04 %
4 NS 3P W-2 200 9 64.29
5 NS 4P W+2 -480 6 42.86
6 NS 3C E = -140 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
e.1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 50,89 %
7 NS 1S S+1 120 7 50.00
8 NS 2P E-1 50 3 21.43
9 NS 2K S-1 -50 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
e11 Dominique Sassen -Christiane Huby 60,71 %
10 NS 4P E = -620 2 14.29
11 NS 4T S = 130 12 85.71
12 NS 3T E+1 -130 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
e10 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes 46,61 %
13 NS 2P W-2 200 14 100.00
14 NS 6P W = -980 5 35.71
15 NS 4T W = -130 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
e.9 Benedicte Lemaigre -Diane de Behault 42,86 %
16 NS 4P S-1 -50 2 14.29
17 NS 4K N+2 170 3 21.43
18 NS 1S E-1 50 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
e.8 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle 58,51 %
19 NS 3S W = -600 1 7.14
20 NS 3S S-1 -100 0 0.00
21 NS 3S W-2 100 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
e.7 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 59,23 %
22 NS 4P N-2 -100 0 0.00
23 NS 4P W = -620 3 21.43
24 NS 1S W-1 50 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
e.6 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck 43,63 %
25 NS 3C N-2 -100 12 85.71
26 NS 5P S+1 680 4 28.57
27 NS 4K S-1 -50 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
Total : 146,0 / 336 = 43,45 %
PAIRE e.5 Pascale Ortegat -Benoit Ortegat
N.9 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 45,06 %
4 EO 3C W-1 100 12 85.71
5 EO 4P W+2 -480 8 57.14
6 EO 3P N = 140 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
N10 Nathalie de Laminne -Chantal de Lichtervelde 50,12 %
10 EO 4P E-1 100 3 21.43
11 EO 2P W+1 -140 9 64.29
12 EO 3T E+2 -150 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
N.5 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin 43,75 %
13 EO 2P W = -110 12 85.71
14 EO 6P E+1 -1010 13 92.86
15 EO 3S W = -400 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 88,10 %
N11 Myriam de Timary -Colette Heerinckx 48,93 %
16 EO 4P S = 420 3 21.43
17 EO 4CcS-2 -300 14 100.00
18 EO 1S E = -90 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
N.6 Chris Oostens -Jeanine Bontemps 56,25 %
19 EO 3S W-3 300 1 7.14
20 EO 3S S = 600 12 85.71
21 EO 3S W+1 -430 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
N.1 Daniel Couvreur -Anne Brans 51,90 %
22 EO 3S S-1 -50 9 64.29
23 EO 4P W = -620 11 78.57
24 EO 2P S = 110 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
N.7 Diane Deslignes -Lydia Luyten 49,40 %
25 EO 5T E = -600 8 57.14
26 EO 5P S = 650 13 92.86
27 EO 1S N = 90 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
N.8 Philippe van der Gracht -Thierry Bollansee 55,18 %
31 EO 2S W = -120 10 71.43
32 EO 2C S = 110 10 71.43
33 EO 3C W-2 100 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
Total : 211,0 / 336 = 62,80 %
PAIRE e11 Dominique Sassen -Christiane Huby
N.6 Chris Oostens -Jeanine Bontemps 56,25 %
1 EO 2T N = 90 8 57.14
2 EO 4C S+2 680 4 28.57
3 EO 4TcS-2 -300 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
N.1 Daniel Couvreur -Anne Brans 51,90 %
4 EO 4K S+2 170 9 64.29
5 EO 4P W+2 -480 8 57.14
6 EO 3P N = 140 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
N.7 Diane Deslignes -Lydia Luyten 49,40 %
7 EO 50%50% Ajust 7 50.00
8 EO 1S N-1 -50 14 100.00
9 EO 3TcN-2 -300 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
N.2 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 43,45 %
10 EO 4P E = -620 12 85.71
11 EO 4T S = 130 2 14.29
12 EO 3T E+1 -130 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
N.3 Teresa Dekoster -Michel Lievens 46,70 %
16 EO 2P S+2 170 8 57.14
17 EO 5K N+2 440 4 28.57
18 EO 1S E+1 -120 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
N.4 Alan Beckman -Hugo Baetens 59,23 %
22 EO 3S N-1 -50 9 64.29
23 EO 4P W+1 -650 14 100.00
24 EO 4TcW-2 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
N.5 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin 43,75 %
28 EO 5TcE-1 100 9 64.29
29 EO 4P N+1 650 6 42.86
30 EO 3C E = -140 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
N11 Myriam de Timary -Colette Heerinckx 48,93 %
31 EO 2S W = -120 10 71.43
32 EO 1S W+1 -120 14 100.00
33 EO 3T N+1 130 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
Total : 204,0 / 336 = 60,71 %
PAIRE e.7 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor
N10 Nathalie de Laminne -Chantal de Lichtervelde 50,12 %
4 EO 2K S+4 170 9 64.29
5 EO 4P W+2 -480 8 57.14
6 EO 3C E = -140 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
N11 Myriam de Timary -Colette Heerinckx 48,93 %
10 EO 4P E = -620 12 85.71
11 EO 3P E = -140 9 64.29
12 EO 4C E-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
N.1 Daniel Couvreur -Anne Brans 51,90 %
16 EO 4P S-1 -50 12 85.71
17 EO 5K N+2 440 4 28.57
18 EO 2K E+1 -110 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
N.7 Diane Deslignes -Lydia Luyten 49,40 %
19 EO 3S W-3 300 1 7.14
20 EO 3S S+1 630 6 42.86
21 EO 3S W+1 -430 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
N.2 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 43,45 %
22 EO 4P N-2 -100 14 100.00
23 EO 4P W = -620 11 78.57
24 EO 1S W-1 50 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
N.8 Philippe van der Gracht -Thierry Bollansee 55,18 %
25 EO 3S W+2 -660 14 100.00
26 EO 6P S = 1430 2 14.29
27 EO 3K S = 110 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
N.3 Teresa Dekoster -Michel Lievens 46,70 %
28 EO 5TcE-1 100 9 64.29
29 EO 4P N+1 650 6 42.86
30 EO 3C E-1 50 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
N.9 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 45,06 %
31 EO 2S W-1 50 5 35.71
32 EO 4C S-1 -50 12 85.71
33 EO 2C W+1 -140 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
Total : 199,0 / 336 = 59,23 %
PAIRE e.8 Gaetan van de Werve -Francoise Nibelle
N10 Nathalie de Laminne -Chantal de Lichtervelde 50,12 %
1 EO 2T N+1 110 4 28.57
2 EO 2C S+4 230 11 78.57
3 EO 3P E-1 100 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
N11 Myriam de Timary -Colette Heerinckx 48,93 %
7 EO 3ScS-1 -200 11.6 82.86
8 EO 1S N+1 120 2 14.29
9 EO 2C E+1 -140 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 58,57 %
N.1 Daniel Couvreur -Anne Brans 51,90 %
13 EO 3K S+1 130 2 14.29
14 EO 4P E+1 -450 3 21.43
15 EO 3T W+2 -150 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
N.2 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 43,45 %
19 EO 3S W = -600 13 92.86
20 EO 3S S-1 -100 14 100.00
21 EO 3S W-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
N.8 Philippe van der Gracht -Thierry Bollansee 55,18 %
22 EO 3S S = 400 2 14.29
23 EO 2P W+2 -170 8 57.14
24 EO 3C S-2 -100 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
N.3 Teresa Dekoster -Michel Lievens 46,70 %
25 EO 5T E = -600 8 57.14
26 EO 3S S+3 690 6 42.86
27 EO 2S N-1 -50 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
N.9 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 45,06 %
28 EO 4P N-1 -100 13 92.86
29 EO 4P N+1 650 6 42.86
30 EO 3C E = -140 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
N.4 Alan Beckman -Hugo Baetens 59,23 %
31 EO 3P N-3 -300 14 100.00
32 EO 2C S+2 170 3 21.43
33 EO 3CcW = -530 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
Total : 196,6 / 336 = 58,51 %
PAIRE e.1 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
N.1 Daniel Couvreur -Anne Brans 51,90 %
1 EO 1S N-1 -50 13 92.86
2 EO 4C S+2 680 4 28.57
3 EO 3P E-1 100 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
N.7 Diane Deslignes -Lydia Luyten 49,40 %
4 EO 5K S+1 620 1 7.14
5 EO 4P W+2 -480 8 57.14
6 EO 4P N-1 -50 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
N.2 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 43,45 %
7 EO 1S S+1 120 7 50.00
8 EO 2P E-1 50 11 78.57
9 EO 2K S-1 -50 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
N.8 Philippe van der Gracht -Thierry Bollansee 55,18 %
10 EO 4P E = -620 12 85.71
11 EO 3C W-2 100 4 28.57
12 EO 4T E+1 -150 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
N.3 Teresa Dekoster -Michel Lievens 46,70 %
13 EO 3S N-1 -100 8 57.14
14 EO 6P E = -980 9 64.29
15 EO 3S W+1 -430 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
N.4 Alan Beckman -Hugo Baetens 59,23 %
19 EO 3S W-1 100 5 35.71
20 EO 3S S+1 630 6 42.86
21 EO 3S W-1 50 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
N.5 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin 43,75 %
25 EO 5K W+1 -620 12 85.71
26 EO 4S S+2 690 6 42.86
27 EO 2S N-1 -50 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
N.6 Chris Oostens -Jeanine Bontemps 56,25 %
31 EO 2S W-2 100 1 7.14
32 EO 2C S+2 170 3 21.43
33 EO 4T N = 130 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 14,29 %
Total : 171,0 / 336 = 50,89 %
PAIRE e10 Manolo Hernandez -Miguel Paredes
N11 Myriam de Timary -Colette Heerinckx 48,93 %
1 EO 2T N+1 110 4 28.57
2 EO 3C S+3 230 11 78.57
3 EO 2P E = -110 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
N.6 Chris Oostens -Jeanine Bontemps 56,25 %
4 EO 2C W+1 -140 14 100.00
5 EO 3P W+3 -230 0 0.00
6 EO 3P N = 140 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
N.1 Daniel Couvreur -Anne Brans 51,90 %
7 EO 3S S = 600 3.6 25.71
8 EO 3P E-2 100 6 42.86
9 EO 3T N-2 -100 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 37,14 %
N.2 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 43,45 %
13 EO 2P W-2 200 0 0.00
14 EO 6P W = -980 9 64.29
15 EO 4T W = -130 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
N.3 Teresa Dekoster -Michel Lievens 46,70 %
19 EO 3K W-1 100 5 35.71
20 EO 3S S+2 660 0 0.00
21 EO 3S W = -400 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
N.4 Alan Beckman -Hugo Baetens 59,23 %
25 EO 2K W+3 -150 4 28.57
26 EO 6S N = 1440 0 0.00
27 EO 3S N-1 -50 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
N10 Nathalie de Laminne -Chantal de Lichtervelde 50,12 %
28 EO 4P N = 620 2 14.29
29 EO 2P N+3 200 14 100.00
30 EO 3C E-1 50 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
N.5 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin 43,75 %
31 EO 2S W = -120 10 71.43
32 EO 3C S = 140 7 50.00
33 EO 3CcW = -530 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
Total : 156,6 / 336 = 46,61 %
PAIRE e.6 Christian Deruyck -Chantal Deruyck
N.9 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 45,06 %
1 EO 2T N+1 110 4 28.57
2 EO 3C N+2 200 14 100.00
3 EO 3P E-1 100 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
N10 Nathalie de Laminne -Chantal de Lichtervelde 50,12 %
7 EO 3S S = 600 3.6 25.71
8 EO 2P E-1 50 11 78.57
9 EO 3K S-1 -50 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 41,90 %
N11 Myriam de Timary -Colette Heerinckx 48,93 %
13 EO 4K S-1 -100 8 57.14
14 EO 5P W = -450 3 21.43
15 EO 3T W+1 -130 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
N.6 Chris Oostens -Jeanine Bontemps 56,25 %
16 EO 4P S = 420 3 21.43
17 EO 4K N+2 170 11 78.57
18 EO 1S N-1 -100 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
N.1 Daniel Couvreur -Anne Brans 51,90 %
19 EO 3K W = -110 9 64.29
20 EO 3S S+1 630 6 42.86
21 EO 3K E-1 50 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
N.7 Diane Deslignes -Lydia Luyten 49,40 %
22 EO 3P N = 140 4 28.57
23 EO 4P W-1 100 5 35.71
24 EO 1S W-1 50 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
N.2 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 43,45 %
25 EO 3C N-2 -100 2 14.29
26 EO 5P S+1 680 10 71.43
27 EO 4K S-1 -50 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
N.8 Philippe van der Gracht -Thierry Bollansee 55,18 %
28 EO 4P N = 620 2 14.29
29 EO 4P N+1 650 6 42.86
30 EO 3K S = 110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 19,05 %
Total : 146,6 / 336 = 43,63 %
PAIRE e.2 Didier Collart -Catherine de Moffarts
N.7 Diane Deslignes -Lydia Luyten 49,40 %
1 EO 1S W-1 50 10 71.43
2 EO 4C S+2 680 4 28.57
3 EO 2P E+1 -140 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
N.2 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 43,45 %
4 EO 3P W-2 200 5 35.71
5 EO 4P W+2 -480 8 57.14
6 EO 3C E = -140 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
N.8 Philippe van der Gracht -Thierry Bollansee 55,18 %
7 EO 3S S-2 -200 11.6 82.86
8 EO 1S N+1 120 2 14.29
9 EO 3C W-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 32,38 %
N.3 Teresa Dekoster -Michel Lievens 46,70 %
10 EO 3P E+1 -170 8 57.14
11 EO 2P W+2 -170 13 92.86
12 EO 3P N-1 -100 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
N.9 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 45,06 %
13 EO 4K S-2 -200 14 100.00
14 EO 5P E+2 -510 6 42.86
15 EO 5T W-1 50 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
N.4 Alan Beckman -Hugo Baetens 59,23 %
16 EO 4P S = 420 3 21.43
17 EO 3PcE-2 300 8 57.14
18 EO 2S E-1 50 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
N.5 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin 43,75 %
22 EO 3S N+1 430 0 0.00
23 EO 4P W-2 200 1 7.14
24 EO 2S N-1 -50 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
N.6 Chris Oostens -Jeanine Bontemps 56,25 %
28 EO 4P N = 620 2 14.29
29 EO 4P N+1 650 6 42.86
30 EO 3C E-2 100 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
Total : 144,6 / 336 = 43,04 %
PAIRE e.4 Mado Miller -Ghislaine Deschuyteneer
N.8 Philippe van der Gracht -Thierry Bollansee 55,18 %
1 EO 1S N-1 -50 13 92.86
2 EO 4C S+2 680 4 28.57
3 EO 4P E-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
N.9 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 45,06 %
7 EO 3S S-2 -200 11.6 82.86
8 EO 1S N+1 120 2 14.29
9 EO 2C W = -110 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 51,43 %
N.4 Alan Beckman -Hugo Baetens 59,23 %
10 EO 4P E-1 100 3 21.43
11 EO 3PcW-2 300 0 0.00
12 EO 2T E+2 -130 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 21,43 %
N10 Nathalie de Laminne -Chantal de Lichtervelde 50,12 %
13 EO 3K S = 110 4 28.57
14 EO 6P E+1 -1010 13 92.86
15 EO 3S W-1 50 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
N.5 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin 43,75 %
16 EO 4P S = 420 3 21.43
17 EO 3S N+2 460 0 0.00
18 EO 2P S-1 -100 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
N11 Myriam de Timary -Colette Heerinckx 48,93 %
19 EO 3S W = -600 13 92.86
20 EO 3S S+1 630 6 42.86
21 EO 3K E-1 50 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
N.6 Chris Oostens -Jeanine Bontemps 56,25 %
22 EO 4P N-1 -50 9 64.29
23 EO 4P W-2 200 1 7.14
24 EO 3S N-1 -50 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
N.7 Diane Deslignes -Lydia Luyten 49,40 %
28 EO 3P N+1 170 6 42.86
29 EO 4P N+1 650 6 42.86
30 EO 3K S-1 -50 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
Total : 144,6 / 336 = 43,04 %
PAIRE e.9 Benedicte Lemaigre -Diane de Behault
N.5 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin 43,75 %
1 EO 1S W-3 150 0 0.00
2 EO 4C S+2 680 4 28.57
3 EO 4P E = -620 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
N11 Myriam de Timary -Colette Heerinckx 48,93 %
4 EO 3C W-2 200 5 35.71
5 EO 4P W+2 -480 8 57.14
6 EO 4C E-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
N.1 Daniel Couvreur -Anne Brans 51,90 %
10 EO 4P E-1 100 3 21.43
11 EO 5T S-1 -50 6 42.86
12 EO 3C E = -140 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
N.2 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 43,45 %
16 EO 4P S-1 -50 12 85.71
17 EO 4K N+2 170 11 78.57
18 EO 1S E-1 50 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
N.3 Teresa Dekoster -Michel Lievens 46,70 %
22 EO 3S N-1 -50 9 64.29
23 EO 4P W-1 100 5 35.71
24 EO 1S N = 90 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
N.9 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 45,06 %
25 EO 3S E-1 100 0 0.00
26 EO 4P S+1 650 13 92.86
27 EO 2K S+2 130 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
N.4 Alan Beckman -Hugo Baetens 59,23 %
28 EO 4P N-1 -100 13 92.86
29 EO 4P N+1 650 6 42.86
30 EO 4C E-2 100 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
N10 Nathalie de Laminne -Chantal de Lichtervelde 50,12 %
31 EO 2S W-2 100 1 7.14
32 EO 2C S+1 140 7 50.00
33 EO 2P S-1 -50 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
Total : 144,0 / 336 = 42,86 %
PAIRE e.3 Patricia Bardy -Patrizia Vaccani
N.8 Philippe van der Gracht -Thierry Bollansee 55,18 %
4 EO 5K S+1 620 1 7.14
5 EO 4P W+2 -480 8 57.14
6 EO 3P N = 140 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
N.3 Teresa Dekoster -Michel Lievens 46,70 %
7 EO 3S S+1 630 0.1 0.71
8 EO 1S N = 90 8 57.14
9 EO 1C W+2 -140 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 45,48 %
N.9 Eliane de Ceuninck -Sophie Tilemans 45,06 %
10 EO 4P E-1 100 3 21.43
11 EO 2P W+2 -170 13 92.86
12 EO 3T E+1 -130 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
N.4 Alan Beckman -Hugo Baetens 59,23 %
13 EO 3S N-1 -100 8 57.14
14 EO 6P E-1 50 0 0.00
15 EO 3S E-1 50 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
N10 Nathalie de Laminne -Chantal de Lichtervelde 50,12 %
16 EO 4P S-1 -50 12 85.71
17 EO 5K N+2 440 4 28.57
18 EO 1S E-1 50 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
N.5 Michele Berrier -Claire Destin 43,75 %
19 EO 3K W = -110 9 64.29
20 EO 3S S+1 630 6 42.86
21 EO 3K E = -110 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
N.6 Chris Oostens -Jeanine Bontemps 56,25 %
25 EO 5K W = -600 8 57.14
26 EO 3S S+3 690 6 42.86
27 EO 3K S = 110 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
N.7 Diane Deslignes -Lydia Luyten 49,40 %
31 EO 2S W-1 50 5 35.71
32 EO 4C S = 420 0 0.00
33 EO 3T N+1 130 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
Total : 130,1 / 336 = 38,72 %
|