B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 62,41 A.7 Patrick Gilles -Marie J. de Wagheneire
--- 2 60,35 A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier
--- 3 58,20 A.9 Giuseppe Napoli -Chantal de Lichtervelde
--- 4 53,49 A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Fabienne Smit
--- 5 51,18 A12 Hugo Baetens -Michel Lahaut
--- 6 51,05 A.4 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier
--- 7 48,53 A.1 Simone Munsterhjelm -Eliane de Ceuninck
--- 8 48,39 A.3 Claire Derieuw -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
--- 9 47,00 A14 Natalie van den Berg -Marie Claire Vienne
--- 10 45,93 A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren
--- 11 45,74 A.8 Anne Van den Berge -Pascale Nobels
--- 12 42,77 A.5 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry
--- 13 42,58 A10 Sylviane Delbeke -Francoise Turin
--- 14 42,08 A13 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 57,82 a13 Myriam de Timary -Serge Alard
--- 2 57,58 a12 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat
--- 3 55,70 a.3 Nadine Brabant -Pascale Bodart
--- 4 55,09 a.4 Francoise Nibelle -Gaetan van de Werve
--- 5 54,83 a.5 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens
--- 6 52,58 a.2 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne
--- 7 51,38 a.7 Francis Rittweger -Gaetan Collinet
--- 8 50,09 a10 Teresa Dekoster -Jeannine Wanderpepen
--- 9 47,71 a.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart
--- 10 46,99 a11 Pascale Graton -Diane Deslignes
--- 11 42,01 a.6 Michele Verhulst -Sandra Dallemagne
--- 12 40,89 a.9 Christiane Huby -Michel Lievens
--- 13 37,22 a.8 Evelyn Sorel -Veronique Englebienne
--- 14 0,00 a14 -
PAIRE A.7 Patrick Gilles -Marie J. de Wagheneire
a12 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat 57,58 %
1 NS 3P W = -140 7.7 35.00
2 NS 3S S+1 630 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a11 Pascale Graton -Diane Deslignes 46,99 %
3 NS 6S N = 990 21.9 99.55
4 NS 4PcW-3 800 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 99,55 %
a10 Teresa Dekoster -Jeannine Wanderpepen 50,09 %
5 NS 2S S-1 -100 4.5 20.45
6 NS 4CcE-1 200 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.9 Christiane Huby -Michel Lievens 40,89 %
7 NS 3K S+2 150 13.2 60.00
8 NS 6C W+1 -1010 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.7 Francis Rittweger -Gaetan Collinet 51,38 %
13 NS 4P N+2 680 12.1 55.00
14 NS 3S E-1 50 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a.6 Michele Verhulst -Sandra Dallemagne 42,01 %
15 NS 4P E+3 -510 13.2 60.00
16 NS 1S E-1 100 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a.5 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 54,83 %
17 NS 3P W-1 50 12.1 55.00
18 NS 3S N = 600 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a.4 Francoise Nibelle -Gaetan van de Werve 55,09 %
19 NS 5K S-2 -100 2.3 10.45
20 NS 2P E = -110 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 5,45 %
a.3 Nadine Brabant -Pascale Bodart 55,70 %
21 NS 2C E+2 -170 9 40.91
22 NS 3K S+1 130 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne 52,58 %
23 NS 3P S-1 -100 20.8 94.55
24 NS 3P N-1 -50 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
a.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 47,71 %
25 NS 5C W = -650 5 22.73
26 NS 3K W+1 -130 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a13 Myriam de Timary -Serge Alard 57,82 %
27 NS 1S S+1 120 19.7 89.55
28 NS 4P S+2 680 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
Total : 329,5 / 528 = 62,41 %
PAIRE A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier
a.2 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne 52,58 %
3 NS 4P S+1 450 11 50.00
4 NS 3T E+1 -130 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 47,71 %
5 NS 2P N = 110 7.7 35.00
6 NS 4C E-2 200 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a14 - 0,00 %
7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a13 Myriam de Timary -Serge Alard 57,82 %
9 NS 4C S-1 -50 6.6 30.00
10 NS 4P S-1 -100 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
a12 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat 57,58 %
11 NS 1S W = -90 9.9 45.00
12 NS 4P S = 620 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a11 Pascale Graton -Diane Deslignes 46,99 %
13 NS 4P N+2 680 12.1 55.00
14 NS 2S E = -120 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
a10 Teresa Dekoster -Jeannine Wanderpepen 50,09 %
15 NS 4P E+3 -510 13.2 60.00
16 NS 1S E = -90 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.8 Evelyn Sorel -Veronique Englebienne 37,22 %
17 NS 2T N+2 130 21.9 99.55
18 NS 3S N+1 630 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 99,55 %
a.7 Francis Rittweger -Gaetan Collinet 51,38 %
19 NS 5T W-2 200 9.9 45.00
20 NS 2P E-2 200 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
a.6 Michele Verhulst -Sandra Dallemagne 42,01 %
21 NS 1S S = 90 21 95.45
22 NS 4T E-1 100 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.5 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 54,83 %
23 NS 3C E+1 -170 14.3 65.00
24 NS 2P N = 110 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
a.4 Francoise Nibelle -Gaetan van de Werve 55,09 %
25 NS 4PcN-2 -300 18 81.82
26 NS 3S W = -600 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
Total : 292,1 / 484 = 60,35 %
PAIRE A.9 Giuseppe Napoli -Chantal de Lichtervelde
a.3 Nadine Brabant -Pascale Bodart 55,70 %
1 NS 2S E-2 100 18.6 84.55
2 NS 3S S+1 630 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 47,71 %
3 NS 6P S = 980 19.7 89.55
4 NS 3S W-1 100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a14 - 0,00 %
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a13 Myriam de Timary -Serge Alard 57,82 %
7 NS 3K S+3 170 18.6 84.55
8 NS 6C W+1 -1010 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
a12 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat 57,58 %
9 NS 3C S-1 -50 6.6 30.00
10 NS 3P S+1 170 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
a11 Pascale Graton -Diane Deslignes 46,99 %
11 NS 1S W-1 50 19.7 89.55
12 NS 2S N+2 180 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a.9 Christiane Huby -Michel Lievens 40,89 %
17 NS 1S S = 90 17.5 79.55
18 NS 1S N+1 120 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a.8 Evelyn Sorel -Veronique Englebienne 37,22 %
19 NS 3C S = 140 6.6 30.00
20 NS 3P E-1 100 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 32,50 %
a.7 Francis Rittweger -Gaetan Collinet 51,38 %
21 NS 2C E+1 -140 13 59.09
22 NS 4KcS = 510 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
a.6 Michele Verhulst -Sandra Dallemagne 42,01 %
23 NS 4C E+1 -650 0.1 0.45
24 NS 2P N = 110 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a.5 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 54,83 %
25 NS 4P N-3 -150 21 95.45
26 NS 5K W = -600 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.4 Francoise Nibelle -Gaetan van de Werve 55,09 %
27 NS 1S S-3 -150 7.7 35.00
28 NS 4P S+2 680 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 281,7 / 484 = 58,20 %
PAIRE A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Fabienne Smit
a.7 Francis Rittweger -Gaetan Collinet 51,38 %
1 NS 2S E+2 -180 4.5 20.45
2 NS 3S S+1 630 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 45,23 %
a.6 Michele Verhulst -Sandra Dallemagne 42,01 %
3 NS 4P S+1 450 11 50.00
4 NS 2P W-1 100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.5 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 54,83 %
5 NS 2P N+2 170 18.6 84.55
6 NS 3P E = -140 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.3 Nadine Brabant -Pascale Bodart 55,70 %
7 NS 3K S+1 130 6.6 30.00
8 NS 6C W = -980 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne 52,58 %
9 NS 3C S = 140 19.7 89.55
10 NS 4P S = 620 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 87,05 %
a.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 47,71 %
11 NS 1S W = -90 9.9 45.00
12 NS 3S N-1 -100 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
a14 - 0,00 %
13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a13 Myriam de Timary -Serge Alard 57,82 %
15 NS 7S E-3 150 21.9 99.55
16 NS 1S E = -90 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a11 Pascale Graton -Diane Deslignes 46,99 %
21 NS 1S S-2 -200 3 13.64
22 NS 3T E = -110 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
a10 Teresa Dekoster -Jeannine Wanderpepen 50,09 %
23 NS 3C E+1 -170 14.3 65.00
24 NS 2P N-1 -50 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.9 Christiane Huby -Michel Lievens 40,89 %
25 NS 5C W = -650 5 22.73
26 NS 3P N-2 -200 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a.8 Evelyn Sorel -Veronique Englebienne 37,22 %
27 NS 1S S+2 150 21.9 99.55
28 NS 4P S+2 680 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
Total : 258,9 / 484 = 53,49 %
PAIRE A12 Hugo Baetens -Michel Lahaut
a.9 Christiane Huby -Michel Lievens 40,89 %
1 NS 3S E-4 200 21.9 99.55
2 NS 3S S+1 630 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
a.8 Evelyn Sorel -Veronique Englebienne 37,22 %
3 NS 4P S+2 480 17.5 79.55
4 NS 3P W-2 200 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 82,05 %
a.7 Francis Rittweger -Gaetan Collinet 51,38 %
5 NS 2P N = 110 7.7 35.00
6 NS 3C E = -140 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a.6 Michele Verhulst -Sandra Dallemagne 42,01 %
7 NS 5KcS-1 -200 1.2 5.45
8 NS 4C W+3 -510 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.4 Francoise Nibelle -Gaetan van de Werve 55,09 %
9 NS 3S N+1 430 21.9 99.55
10 NS 3S W-3 300 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
a.3 Nadine Brabant -Pascale Bodart 55,70 %
11 NS 1S W = -90 9.9 45.00
12 NS 4P S-1 -100 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne 52,58 %
13 NS 4P S+2 680 12.1 55.00
14 NS 3C N-4 -200 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 47,71 %
15 NS 4P E+3 -510 13.2 60.00
16 NS 1S E-1 100 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a14 - 0,00 %
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a12 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat 57,58 %
23 NS 4C E = -620 4.5 20.45
24 NS 4PcN-3 -500 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
a11 Pascale Graton -Diane Deslignes 46,99 %
25 NS 4PcN-3 -500 14 63.64
26 NS 5K W = -600 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a10 Teresa Dekoster -Jeannine Wanderpepen 50,09 %
27 NS 1S S-3 -150 7.7 35.00
28 NS 4P S+2 680 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 247,7 / 484 = 51,18 %
PAIRE A.4 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier
a.6 Michele Verhulst -Sandra Dallemagne 42,01 %
1 NS 4P W-1 50 14.3 65.00
2 NS 3S S+1 630 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 67,50 %
a.4 Francoise Nibelle -Gaetan van de Werve 55,09 %
7 NS 4C E-2 200 21.9 99.55
8 NS 4C W+3 -510 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 92,05 %
a.3 Nadine Brabant -Pascale Bodart 55,70 %
9 NS 4C S-1 -50 6.6 30.00
10 NS 4K E-1 100 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne 52,58 %
11 NS 1S W = -90 9.9 45.00
12 NS 2C W = -110 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 47,71 %
13 NS 5P N+1 680 12.1 55.00
14 NS 3K W+1 -130 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a14 - 0,00 %
15 NS BYE 0 0.00
16 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a13 Myriam de Timary -Serge Alard 57,82 %
17 NS 3P W+1 -170 2.3 10.45
18 NS 2S N = 120 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a12 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat 57,58 %
19 NS 5T W-2 200 9.9 45.00
20 NS 3P E-1 100 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a10 Teresa Dekoster -Jeannine Wanderpepen 50,09 %
21 NS 1S S = 90 21 95.45
22 NS 4T E = -130 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.9 Christiane Huby -Michel Lievens 40,89 %
23 NS 3C E+1 -170 14.3 65.00
24 NS 2P N = 110 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
a.8 Evelyn Sorel -Veronique Englebienne 37,22 %
25 NS 4P N-3 -150 21 95.45
26 NS 3S W = -600 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.7 Francis Rittweger -Gaetan Collinet 51,38 %
27 NS 1S S-3 -150 7.7 35.00
28 NS 4P S+2 680 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 247,1 / 484 = 51,05 %
PAIRE A.1 Simone Munsterhjelm -Eliane de Ceuninck
a.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 47,71 %
1 NS 4P W-1 50 14.3 65.00
2 NS 3S S = 600 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a14 - 0,00 %
3 NS BYE 0 0.00
4 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a13 Myriam de Timary -Serge Alard 57,82 %
5 NS 3C S-2 -200 2.3 10.45
6 NS 3C E = -140 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 15,45 %
a12 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat 57,58 %
7 NS 3K S+3 170 18.6 84.55
8 NS 7C W = -1510 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a11 Pascale Graton -Diane Deslignes 46,99 %
9 NS 2C S = 110 15.4 70.00
10 NS 5K E-1 100 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
a10 Teresa Dekoster -Jeannine Wanderpepen 50,09 %
11 NS 1S W-2 100 21.9 99.55
12 NS 4P S = 620 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 94,55 %
a.9 Christiane Huby -Michel Lievens 40,89 %
13 NS 4P N+2 680 12.1 55.00
14 NS 3S E-1 50 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a.7 Francis Rittweger -Gaetan Collinet 51,38 %
15 NS 6P E+1 -1010 1.2 5.45
16 NS 1S E+1 -120 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 12,95 %
a.6 Michele Verhulst -Sandra Dallemagne 42,01 %
17 NS 2T N = 90 17.5 79.55
18 NS 3S N-1 -100 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.5 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 54,83 %
19 NS 4P N = 420 13.2 60.00
20 NS 2P E-1 100 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.4 Francoise Nibelle -Gaetan van de Werve 55,09 %
21 NS 1S S-1 -100 17 77.27
22 NS 4T E-1 100 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.3 Nadine Brabant -Pascale Bodart 55,70 %
23 NS 3C E+1 -170 14.3 65.00
24 NS 4PcN-2 -300 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
Total : 234,9 / 484 = 48,53 %
PAIRE A.3 Claire Derieuw -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
a.3 Nadine Brabant -Pascale Bodart 55,70 %
5 NS 2S S = 120 12.1 55.00
6 NS 4C E-2 200 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne 52,58 %
7 NS 3K S+1 130 6.6 30.00
8 NS 6C W+1 -1010 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
a.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 47,71 %
9 NS 2C S = 110 15.4 70.00
10 NS 4K E-2 200 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a14 - 0,00 %
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a13 Myriam de Timary -Serge Alard 57,82 %
13 NS 4P N+2 680 12.1 55.00
14 NS 3K W+1 -130 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a12 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat 57,58 %
15 NS 4P E+3 -510 13.2 60.00
16 NS 1S E = -90 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a11 Pascale Graton -Diane Deslignes 46,99 %
17 NS 3P W+1 -170 2.3 10.45
18 NS 3S N-1 -100 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
a.9 Christiane Huby -Michel Lievens 40,89 %
19 NS 4P N+2 480 20.8 94.55
20 NS 3T N = 110 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
a.8 Evelyn Sorel -Veronique Englebienne 37,22 %
21 NS 2P N-1 -100 17 77.27
22 NS 4T E-1 100 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.7 Francis Rittweger -Gaetan Collinet 51,38 %
23 NS 4C E = -620 4.5 20.45
24 NS 4P N-2 -100 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.6 Michele Verhulst -Sandra Dallemagne 42,01 %
25 NS 4C E+2 -680 0 0.00
26 NS 3K W+2 -150 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.5 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 54,83 %
27 NS 1S S-3 -150 7.7 35.00
28 NS 4P S+2 680 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 234,2 / 484 = 48,39 %
PAIRE A14 Natalie van den Berg -Marie Claire Vienne
a13 Myriam de Timary -Serge Alard 57,82 %
1 NS 3C N-1 -50 11 50.00
2 NS 2P E-1 50 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a12 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat 57,58 %
3 NS 4P S+1 450 11 50.00
4 NS 2P W = -110 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a11 Pascale Graton -Diane Deslignes 46,99 %
5 NS 3S S = 600 21.9 99.55
6 NS 4C E-1 100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
a10 Teresa Dekoster -Jeannine Wanderpepen 50,09 %
7 NS 3K S+2 150 13.2 60.00
8 NS 4C W+3 -510 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a.9 Christiane Huby -Michel Lievens 40,89 %
9 NS 2C S = 110 15.4 70.00
10 NS 5KcE-1 200 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a.8 Evelyn Sorel -Veronique Englebienne 37,22 %
11 NS 2P S-1 -50 16.5 75.00
12 NS 3CcW-2 300 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 72,50 %
a.6 Michele Verhulst -Sandra Dallemagne 42,01 %
13 NS 4P N+2 680 12.1 55.00
14 NS 3K W+1 -130 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.5 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 54,83 %
15 NS 4P E+3 -510 13.2 60.00
16 NS 1ScE+1 -380 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a.4 Francoise Nibelle -Gaetan van de Werve 55,09 %
17 NS 3P W+1 -170 2.3 10.45
18 NS 1K S+2 110 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
a.3 Nadine Brabant -Pascale Bodart 55,70 %
19 NS 5K S-1 -50 4.5 20.45
20 NS 3P E-1 100 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne 52,58 %
21 NS 2C E+1 -140 13 59.09
22 NS 4T E = -130 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a14 - 0,00 %
27 NS BYE 0 0.00
28 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 227,5 / 484 = 47,00 %
PAIRE A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren
a10 Teresa Dekoster -Jeannine Wanderpepen 50,09 %
1 NS 4P W = -420 0.1 0.45
2 NS 3C N-1 -100 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 0,45 %
a.9 Christiane Huby -Michel Lievens 40,89 %
3 NS 4P S = 420 3.4 15.45
4 NS 4P W-2 200 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.8 Evelyn Sorel -Veronique Englebienne 37,22 %
5 NS 3S N-3 -300 0.1 0.45
6 NS 4C E-1 100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a.6 Michele Verhulst -Sandra Dallemagne 42,01 %
11 NS 1S N-1 -50 16.5 75.00
12 NS 1S N+2 150 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
a.5 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 54,83 %
13 NS 4P N+2 680 12.1 55.00
14 NS 3K W+1 -130 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.4 Francoise Nibelle -Gaetan van de Werve 55,09 %
15 NS 4P E+3 -510 13.2 60.00
16 NS 1S E = -90 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.3 Nadine Brabant -Pascale Bodart 55,70 %
17 NS 2P W+1 -140 7.7 35.00
18 NS 2S N = 120 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne 52,58 %
19 NS 4P N+2 480 20.8 94.55
20 NS 2P E-1 100 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 47,71 %
21 NS 1S S-2 -200 3 13.64
22 NS 4T E-1 100 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a14 - 0,00 %
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a12 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat 57,58 %
25 NS 4PcN-3 -500 14 63.64
26 NS 4K W+1 -150 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a11 Pascale Graton -Diane Deslignes 46,99 %
27 NS 1S S = 90 16.5 75.00
28 NS 4P S+1 650 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 45,23 %
Total : 222,3 / 484 = 45,93 %
PAIRE A.8 Anne Van den Berge -Pascale Nobels
a14 - 0,00 %
1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a13 Myriam de Timary -Serge Alard 57,82 %
3 NS 4P S = 420 3.4 15.45
4 NS 4T E-1 100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a12 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat 57,58 %
5 NS 2P N+1 140 15.4 70.00
6 NS 2C E+1 -140 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 45,23 %
a11 Pascale Graton -Diane Deslignes 46,99 %
7 NS 3K S+2 150 13.2 60.00
8 NS 7C W = -1510 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a10 Teresa Dekoster -Jeannine Wanderpepen 50,09 %
9 NS 4C S-2 -100 0.1 0.45
10 NS 4P S = 620 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a.8 Evelyn Sorel -Veronique Englebienne 37,22 %
15 NS 6S W = -990 4.5 20.45
16 NS 1S E-1 100 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.7 Francis Rittweger -Gaetan Collinet 51,38 %
17 NS 2P W+1 -140 7.7 35.00
18 NS 1S S+1 120 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.6 Michele Verhulst -Sandra Dallemagne 42,01 %
19 NS 4P N+1 450 16.5 75.00
20 NS 3C S = 140 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.5 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 54,83 %
21 NS 1S S-2 -200 3 13.64
22 NS 4K S-1 -50 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a.4 Francoise Nibelle -Gaetan van de Werve 55,09 %
23 NS 3C E+2 -200 8.8 40.00
24 NS 2P N = 110 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a.3 Nadine Brabant -Pascale Bodart 55,70 %
25 NS 4C W+1 -650 5 22.73
26 NS 5K W = -600 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne 52,58 %
27 NS 2P E = -110 13.2 60.00
28 NS 4P S+2 680 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
Total : 221,4 / 484 = 45,74 %
PAIRE A.5 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry
a.8 Evelyn Sorel -Veronique Englebienne 37,22 %
1 NS 2S E-2 100 18.6 84.55
2 NS 3S S+2 660 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 92,05 %
a.7 Francis Rittweger -Gaetan Collinet 51,38 %
3 NS 4P S+1 450 11 50.00
4 NS 2T E+2 -130 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a.5 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 54,83 %
9 NS 3C S-1 -50 6.6 30.00
10 NS 4P S = 620 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
a.4 Francoise Nibelle -Gaetan van de Werve 55,09 %
11 NS 1S W+1 -120 1.2 5.45
12 NS 4P S-1 -100 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
a.3 Nadine Brabant -Pascale Bodart 55,70 %
13 NS 4P S+2 680 12.1 55.00
14 NS 3K W+1 -130 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne 52,58 %
15 NS 6P E+1 -1010 1.2 5.45
16 NS 1S E = -90 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 47,71 %
17 NS 1S S = 90 17.5 79.55
18 NS 3S N-1 -100 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a14 - 0,00 %
19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a13 Myriam de Timary -Serge Alard 57,82 %
21 NS 1S S-2 -200 3 13.64
22 NS 3T E+1 -130 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
a11 Pascale Graton -Diane Deslignes 46,99 %
23 NS 3P S-1 -100 20.8 94.55
24 NS 3C W-3 150 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 97,05 %
a10 Teresa Dekoster -Jeannine Wanderpepen 50,09 %
25 NS 5T W = -600 10 45.45
26 NS 5K W = -600 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a.9 Christiane Huby -Michel Lievens 40,89 %
27 NS 1S S-4 -200 0.1 0.45
28 NS 4P S+1 650 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 7,95 %
Total : 207,0 / 484 = 42,77 %
PAIRE A10 Sylviane Delbeke -Francoise Turin
a.5 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 54,83 %
1 NS 2P W+3 -200 2.3 10.45
2 NS 2S S+2 180 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
a.4 Francoise Nibelle -Gaetan van de Werve 55,09 %
3 NS 6P S-1 -50 0.1 0.45
4 NS 3T E+1 -130 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 7,95 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne 52,58 %
5 NS 1S S+1 120 12.1 55.00
6 NS 3C E = -140 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 47,71 %
7 NS 5KcS-1 -200 1.2 5.45
8 NS 2CcW+5 -970 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a14 - 0,00 %
9 NS BYE 0 0.00
10 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a13 Myriam de Timary -Serge Alard 57,82 %
11 NS 1S W+1 -120 1.2 5.45
12 NS 4P S = 620 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a12 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat 57,58 %
13 NS 4P N+1 650 0.1 0.45
14 NS 3S E-1 50 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a10 Teresa Dekoster -Jeannine Wanderpepen 50,09 %
19 NS 4P N+1 450 16.5 75.00
20 NS 2P E-1 100 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.9 Christiane Huby -Michel Lievens 40,89 %
21 NS 2C E+2 -170 9 40.91
22 NS 3K S = 110 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.8 Evelyn Sorel -Veronique Englebienne 37,22 %
23 NS 4C E = -620 4.5 20.45
24 NS 4T S-2 -100 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.7 Francis Rittweger -Gaetan Collinet 51,38 %
25 NS 4PcN-3 -500 14 63.64
26 NS 4K W+1 -150 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.6 Michele Verhulst -Sandra Dallemagne 42,01 %
27 NS 1S S = 90 16.5 75.00
28 NS 4P S+2 680 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
Total : 206,1 / 484 = 42,58 %
PAIRE A13 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne
a11 Pascale Graton -Diane Deslignes 46,99 %
1 NS 2P W+1 -140 7.7 35.00
2 NS 2PcE-1 100 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a10 Teresa Dekoster -Jeannine Wanderpepen 50,09 %
3 NS 4P S+1 450 11 50.00
4 NS 4T E = -130 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a.9 Christiane Huby -Michel Lievens 40,89 %
5 NS 3P N+1 170 18.6 84.55
6 NS 4C E-1 100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a.8 Evelyn Sorel -Veronique Englebienne 37,22 %
7 NS 3K S+1 130 6.6 30.00
8 NS 4C W+3 -510 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
a.7 Francis Rittweger -Gaetan Collinet 51,38 %
9 NS 3C S-1 -50 6.6 30.00
10 NS 4P S = 620 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
a.5 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 54,83 %
11 NS 1P S-2 -100 4.5 20.45
12 NS 6P S-2 -200 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
a.4 Francoise Nibelle -Gaetan van de Werve 55,09 %
13 NS 4P N+2 680 12.1 55.00
14 NS 3K W+2 -150 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a.3 Nadine Brabant -Pascale Bodart 55,70 %
15 NS 4P E+3 -510 13.2 60.00
16 NS 1ScE = -180 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
a.2 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne 52,58 %
17 NS 3C E-1 50 12.1 55.00
18 NS 1S S+3 180 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 47,71 %
19 NS 3T W = -110 0.1 0.45
20 NS 3P E-2 200 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a13 Myriam de Timary -Serge Alard 57,82 %
25 NS 4C W+1 -650 5 22.73
26 NS 3K W+1 -130 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a12 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat 57,58 %
27 NS 2P E+2 -170 2.3 10.45
28 NS 5K S+1 620 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 5,45 %
Total : 222,2 / 528 = 42,08 %
PAIRE a13 Myriam de Timary -Serge Alard
A14 Natalie van den Berg -Marie Claire Vienne 47,00 %
1 EO 3C N-1 -50 11 50.00
2 EO 2P E-1 50 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A.8 Anne Van den Berge -Pascale Nobels 45,74 %
3 EO 4P S = 420 18.6 84.55
4 EO 4T E-1 100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A.1 Simone Munsterhjelm -Eliane de Ceuninck 48,53 %
5 EO 3C S-2 -200 19.7 89.55
6 EO 3C E = -140 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 84,55 %
A.9 Giuseppe Napoli -Chantal de Lichtervelde 58,20 %
7 EO 3K S+3 170 3.4 15.45
8 EO 6C W+1 -1010 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 60,35 %
9 EO 4C S-1 -50 15.4 70.00
10 EO 4P S-1 -100 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
A10 Sylviane Delbeke -Francoise Turin 42,58 %
11 EO 1S W+1 -120 20.8 94.55
12 EO 4P S = 620 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.3 Claire Derieuw -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 48,39 %
13 EO 4P N+2 680 9.9 45.00
14 EO 3K W+1 -130 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Fabienne Smit 53,49 %
15 EO 7S E-3 150 0.1 0.45
16 EO 1S E = -90 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A.4 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier 51,05 %
17 EO 3P W+1 -170 19.7 89.55
18 EO 2S N = 120 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A.5 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry 42,77 %
21 EO 1S S-2 -200 19 86.36
22 EO 3T E+1 -130 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
A13 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 42,08 %
25 EO 4C W+1 -650 17 77.27
26 EO 3K W+1 -130 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.7 Patrick Gilles -Marie J. de Wagheneire 62,41 %
27 EO 1S S+1 120 2.3 10.45
28 EO 4P S+2 680 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
Total : 305,3 / 528 = 57,82 %
PAIRE a12 Thierry Bollansee -Benoit Ortegat
A.7 Patrick Gilles -Marie J. de Wagheneire 62,41 %
1 EO 3P W = -140 14.3 65.00
2 EO 3S S+1 630 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A14 Natalie van den Berg -Marie Claire Vienne 47,00 %
3 EO 4P S+1 450 11 50.00
4 EO 2P W = -110 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.8 Anne Van den Berge -Pascale Nobels 45,74 %
5 EO 2P N+1 140 6.6 30.00
6 EO 2C E+1 -140 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 54,77 %
A.1 Simone Munsterhjelm -Eliane de Ceuninck 48,53 %
7 EO 3K S+3 170 3.4 15.45
8 EO 7C W = -1510 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.9 Giuseppe Napoli -Chantal de Lichtervelde 58,20 %
9 EO 3C S-1 -50 15.4 70.00
10 EO 3P S+1 170 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 60,35 %
11 EO 1S W = -90 12.1 55.00
12 EO 4P S = 620 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A10 Sylviane Delbeke -Francoise Turin 42,58 %
13 EO 4P N+1 650 21.9 99.55
14 EO 3S E-1 50 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.3 Claire Derieuw -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 48,39 %
15 EO 4P E+3 -510 8.8 40.00
16 EO 1S E = -90 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.4 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier 51,05 %
19 EO 5T W-2 200 12.1 55.00
20 EO 3P E-1 100 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A12 Hugo Baetens -Michel Lahaut 51,18 %
23 EO 4C E = -620 17.5 79.55
24 EO 4PcN-3 -500 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 45,93 %
25 EO 4PcN-3 -500 8 36.36
26 EO 4K W+1 -150 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A13 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 42,08 %
27 EO 2P E+2 -170 19.7 89.55
28 EO 5K S+1 620 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 94,55 %
Total : 304,0 / 528 = 57,58 %
PAIRE a.3 Nadine Brabant -Pascale Bodart
A.9 Giuseppe Napoli -Chantal de Lichtervelde 58,20 %
1 EO 2S E-2 100 3.4 15.45
2 EO 3S S+1 630 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.3 Claire Derieuw -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 48,39 %
5 EO 2S S = 120 9.9 45.00
6 EO 4C E-2 200 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Fabienne Smit 53,49 %
7 EO 3K S+1 130 15.4 70.00
8 EO 6C W = -980 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A.4 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier 51,05 %
9 EO 4C S-1 -50 15.4 70.00
10 EO 4K E-1 100 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A12 Hugo Baetens -Michel Lahaut 51,18 %
11 EO 1S W = -90 12.1 55.00
12 EO 4P S-1 -100 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
A.5 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry 42,77 %
13 EO 4P S+2 680 9.9 45.00
14 EO 3K W+1 -130 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A13 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 42,08 %
15 EO 4P E+3 -510 8.8 40.00
16 EO 1ScE = -180 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 45,93 %
17 EO 2P W+1 -140 14.3 65.00
18 EO 2S N = 120 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A14 Natalie van den Berg -Marie Claire Vienne 47,00 %
19 EO 5K S-1 -50 17.5 79.55
20 EO 3P E-1 100 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A.7 Patrick Gilles -Marie J. de Wagheneire 62,41 %
21 EO 2C E+2 -170 13 59.09
22 EO 3K S+1 130 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.1 Simone Munsterhjelm -Eliane de Ceuninck 48,53 %
23 EO 3C E+1 -170 7.7 35.00
24 EO 4PcN-2 -300 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A.8 Anne Van den Berge -Pascale Nobels 45,74 %
25 EO 4C W+1 -650 17 77.27
26 EO 5K W = -600 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
Total : 294,1 / 528 = 55,70 %
PAIRE a.4 Francoise Nibelle -Gaetan van de Werve
A10 Sylviane Delbeke -Francoise Turin 42,58 %
3 EO 6P S-1 -50 21.9 99.55
4 EO 3T E+1 -130 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 92,05 %
A.4 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier 51,05 %
7 EO 4C E-2 200 0.1 0.45
8 EO 4C W+3 -510 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 7,95 %
A12 Hugo Baetens -Michel Lahaut 51,18 %
9 EO 3S N+1 430 0.1 0.45
10 EO 3S W-3 300 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
A.5 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry 42,77 %
11 EO 1S W+1 -120 20.8 94.55
12 EO 4P S-1 -100 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
A13 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 42,08 %
13 EO 4P N+2 680 9.9 45.00
14 EO 3K W+2 -150 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 45,93 %
15 EO 4P E+3 -510 8.8 40.00
16 EO 1S E = -90 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A14 Natalie van den Berg -Marie Claire Vienne 47,00 %
17 EO 3P W+1 -170 19.7 89.55
18 EO 1K S+2 110 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
A.7 Patrick Gilles -Marie J. de Wagheneire 62,41 %
19 EO 5K S-2 -100 19.7 89.55
20 EO 2P E = -110 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 94,55 %
A.1 Simone Munsterhjelm -Eliane de Ceuninck 48,53 %
21 EO 1S S-1 -100 5 22.73
22 EO 4T E-1 100 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.8 Anne Van den Berge -Pascale Nobels 45,74 %
23 EO 3C E+2 -200 13.2 60.00
24 EO 2P N = 110 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 60,35 %
25 EO 4PcN-2 -300 4 18.18
26 EO 3S W = -600 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.9 Giuseppe Napoli -Chantal de Lichtervelde 58,20 %
27 EO 1S S-3 -150 14.3 65.00
28 EO 4P S+2 680 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 290,9 / 528 = 55,09 %
PAIRE a.5 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens
A10 Sylviane Delbeke -Francoise Turin 42,58 %
1 EO 2P W+3 -200 19.7 89.55
2 EO 2S S+2 180 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Fabienne Smit 53,49 %
5 EO 2P N+2 170 3.4 15.45
6 EO 3P E = -140 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.5 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry 42,77 %
9 EO 3C S-1 -50 15.4 70.00
10 EO 4P S = 620 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
A13 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 42,08 %
11 EO 1P S-2 -100 17.5 79.55
12 EO 6P S-2 -200 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 45,93 %
13 EO 4P N+2 680 9.9 45.00
14 EO 3K W+1 -130 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A14 Natalie van den Berg -Marie Claire Vienne 47,00 %
15 EO 4P E+3 -510 8.8 40.00
16 EO 1ScE+1 -380 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A.7 Patrick Gilles -Marie J. de Wagheneire 62,41 %
17 EO 3P W-1 50 9.9 45.00
18 EO 3S N = 600 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A.1 Simone Munsterhjelm -Eliane de Ceuninck 48,53 %
19 EO 4P N = 420 8.8 40.00
20 EO 2P E-1 100 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.8 Anne Van den Berge -Pascale Nobels 45,74 %
21 EO 1S S-2 -200 19 86.36
22 EO 4K S-1 -50 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 60,35 %
23 EO 3C E+1 -170 7.7 35.00
24 EO 2P N = 110 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
A.9 Giuseppe Napoli -Chantal de Lichtervelde 58,20 %
25 EO 4P N-3 -150 1 4.55
26 EO 5K W = -600 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.3 Claire Derieuw -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 48,39 %
27 EO 1S S-3 -150 14.3 65.00
28 EO 4P S+2 680 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 289,5 / 528 = 54,83 %
PAIRE a.2 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 60,35 %
3 EO 4P S+1 450 11 50.00
4 EO 3T E+1 -130 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A10 Sylviane Delbeke -Francoise Turin 42,58 %
5 EO 1S S+1 120 9.9 45.00
6 EO 3C E = -140 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A.3 Claire Derieuw -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 48,39 %
7 EO 3K S+1 130 15.4 70.00
8 EO 6C W+1 -1010 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Fabienne Smit 53,49 %
9 EO 3C S = 140 2.3 10.45
10 EO 4P S = 620 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 12,95 %
A.4 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier 51,05 %
11 EO 1S W = -90 12.1 55.00
12 EO 2C W = -110 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A12 Hugo Baetens -Michel Lahaut 51,18 %
13 EO 4P S+2 680 9.9 45.00
14 EO 3C N-4 -200 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A.5 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry 42,77 %
15 EO 6P E+1 -1010 20.8 94.55
16 EO 1S E = -90 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A13 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 42,08 %
17 EO 3C E-1 50 9.9 45.00
18 EO 1S S+3 180 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 45,93 %
19 EO 4P N+2 480 1.2 5.45
20 EO 2P E-1 100 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A14 Natalie van den Berg -Marie Claire Vienne 47,00 %
21 EO 2C E+1 -140 9 40.91
22 EO 4T E = -130 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A.7 Patrick Gilles -Marie J. de Wagheneire 62,41 %
23 EO 3P S-1 -100 1.2 5.45
24 EO 3P N-1 -50 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
A.8 Anne Van den Berge -Pascale Nobels 45,74 %
27 EO 2P E = -110 8.8 40.00
28 EO 4P S+2 680 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
Total : 277,6 / 528 = 52,58 %
PAIRE a.7 Francis Rittweger -Gaetan Collinet
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Fabienne Smit 53,49 %
1 EO 2S E+2 -180 17.5 79.55
2 EO 3S S+1 630 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 54,77 %
A.5 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry 42,77 %
3 EO 4P S+1 450 11 50.00
4 EO 2T E+2 -130 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A12 Hugo Baetens -Michel Lahaut 51,18 %
5 EO 2P N = 110 14.3 65.00
6 EO 3C E = -140 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A13 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 42,08 %
9 EO 3C S-1 -50 15.4 70.00
10 EO 4P S = 620 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
A.7 Patrick Gilles -Marie J. de Wagheneire 62,41 %
13 EO 4P N+2 680 9.9 45.00
14 EO 3S E-1 50 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A.1 Simone Munsterhjelm -Eliane de Ceuninck 48,53 %
15 EO 6P E+1 -1010 20.8 94.55
16 EO 1S E+1 -120 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 87,05 %
A.8 Anne Van den Berge -Pascale Nobels 45,74 %
17 EO 2P W+1 -140 14.3 65.00
18 EO 1S S+1 120 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 60,35 %
19 EO 5T W-2 200 12.1 55.00
20 EO 2P E-2 200 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
A.9 Giuseppe Napoli -Chantal de Lichtervelde 58,20 %
21 EO 2C E+1 -140 9 40.91
22 EO 4KcS = 510 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
A.3 Claire Derieuw -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 48,39 %
23 EO 4C E = -620 17.5 79.55
24 EO 4P N-2 -100 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A10 Sylviane Delbeke -Francoise Turin 42,58 %
25 EO 4PcN-3 -500 8 36.36
26 EO 4K W+1 -150 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.4 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier 51,05 %
27 EO 1S S-3 -150 14.3 65.00
28 EO 4P S+2 680 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 271,3 / 528 = 51,38 %
PAIRE a10 Teresa Dekoster -Jeannine Wanderpepen
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 45,93 %
1 EO 4P W = -420 21.9 99.55
2 EO 3C N-1 -100 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 99,55 %
A13 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 42,08 %
3 EO 4P S+1 450 11 50.00
4 EO 4T E = -130 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A.7 Patrick Gilles -Marie J. de Wagheneire 62,41 %
5 EO 2S S-1 -100 17.5 79.55
6 EO 4CcE-1 200 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A14 Natalie van den Berg -Marie Claire Vienne 47,00 %
7 EO 3K S+2 150 8.8 40.00
8 EO 4C W+3 -510 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A.8 Anne Van den Berge -Pascale Nobels 45,74 %
9 EO 4C S-2 -100 21.9 99.55
10 EO 4P S = 620 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A.1 Simone Munsterhjelm -Eliane de Ceuninck 48,53 %
11 EO 1S W-2 100 0.1 0.45
12 EO 4P S = 620 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 5,45 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 60,35 %
15 EO 4P E+3 -510 8.8 40.00
16 EO 1S E = -90 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A10 Sylviane Delbeke -Francoise Turin 42,58 %
19 EO 4P N+1 450 5.5 25.00
20 EO 2P E-1 100 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.4 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier 51,05 %
21 EO 1S S = 90 1 4.55
22 EO 4T E = -130 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Fabienne Smit 53,49 %
23 EO 3C E+1 -170 7.7 35.00
24 EO 2P N-1 -50 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.5 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry 42,77 %
25 EO 5T W = -600 12 54.55
26 EO 5K W = -600 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A12 Hugo Baetens -Michel Lahaut 51,18 %
27 EO 1S S-3 -150 14.3 65.00
28 EO 4P S+2 680 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 264,5 / 528 = 50,09 %
PAIRE a.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart
A.1 Simone Munsterhjelm -Eliane de Ceuninck 48,53 %
1 EO 4P W-1 50 7.7 35.00
2 EO 3S S = 600 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.9 Giuseppe Napoli -Chantal de Lichtervelde 58,20 %
3 EO 6P S = 980 2.3 10.45
4 EO 3S W-1 100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 60,35 %
5 EO 2P N = 110 14.3 65.00
6 EO 4C E-2 200 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A10 Sylviane Delbeke -Francoise Turin 42,58 %
7 EO 5KcS-1 -200 20.8 94.55
8 EO 2CcW+5 -970 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A.3 Claire Derieuw -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 48,39 %
9 EO 2C S = 110 6.6 30.00
10 EO 4K E-2 200 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Fabienne Smit 53,49 %
11 EO 1S W = -90 12.1 55.00
12 EO 3S N-1 -100 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
A.4 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier 51,05 %
13 EO 5P N+1 680 9.9 45.00
14 EO 3K W+1 -130 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A12 Hugo Baetens -Michel Lahaut 51,18 %
15 EO 4P E+3 -510 8.8 40.00
16 EO 1S E-1 100 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A.5 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry 42,77 %
17 EO 1S S = 90 4.5 20.45
18 EO 3S N-1 -100 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A13 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 42,08 %
19 EO 3T W = -110 21.9 99.55
20 EO 3P E-2 200 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 45,93 %
21 EO 1S S-2 -200 19 86.36
22 EO 4T E-1 100 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.7 Patrick Gilles -Marie J. de Wagheneire 62,41 %
25 EO 5C W = -650 17 77.27
26 EO 3K W+1 -130 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
Total : 251,9 / 528 = 47,71 %
PAIRE a11 Pascale Graton -Diane Deslignes
A13 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 42,08 %
1 EO 2P W+1 -140 14.3 65.00
2 EO 2PcE-1 100 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A.7 Patrick Gilles -Marie J. de Wagheneire 62,41 %
3 EO 6S N = 990 0.1 0.45
4 EO 4PcW-3 800 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 0,45 %
A14 Natalie van den Berg -Marie Claire Vienne 47,00 %
5 EO 3S S = 600 0.1 0.45
6 EO 4C E-1 100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
A.8 Anne Van den Berge -Pascale Nobels 45,74 %
7 EO 3K S+2 150 8.8 40.00
8 EO 7C W = -1510 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A.1 Simone Munsterhjelm -Eliane de Ceuninck 48,53 %
9 EO 2C S = 110 6.6 30.00
10 EO 5K E-1 100 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
A.9 Giuseppe Napoli -Chantal de Lichtervelde 58,20 %
11 EO 1S W-1 50 2.3 10.45
12 EO 2S N+2 180 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 60,35 %
13 EO 4P N+2 680 9.9 45.00
14 EO 2S E = -120 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
A.3 Claire Derieuw -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 48,39 %
17 EO 3P W+1 -170 19.7 89.55
18 EO 3S N-1 -100 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Fabienne Smit 53,49 %
21 EO 1S S-2 -200 19 86.36
22 EO 3T E = -110 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
A.5 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry 42,77 %
23 EO 3P S-1 -100 1.2 5.45
24 EO 3C W-3 150 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 2,95 %
A12 Hugo Baetens -Michel Lahaut 51,18 %
25 EO 4PcN-3 -500 8 36.36
26 EO 5K W = -600 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 45,93 %
27 EO 1S S = 90 5.5 25.00
28 EO 4P S+1 650 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 54,77 %
Total : 248,1 / 528 = 46,99 %
PAIRE a.6 Michele Verhulst -Sandra Dallemagne
A.4 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier 51,05 %
1 EO 4P W-1 50 7.7 35.00
2 EO 3S S+1 630 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 32,50 %
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Fabienne Smit 53,49 %
3 EO 4P S+1 450 11 50.00
4 EO 2P W-1 100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A12 Hugo Baetens -Michel Lahaut 51,18 %
7 EO 5KcS-1 -200 20.8 94.55
8 EO 4C W+3 -510 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 45,93 %
11 EO 1S N-1 -50 5.5 25.00
12 EO 1S N+2 150 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
A14 Natalie van den Berg -Marie Claire Vienne 47,00 %
13 EO 4P N+2 680 9.9 45.00
14 EO 3K W+1 -130 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.7 Patrick Gilles -Marie J. de Wagheneire 62,41 %
15 EO 4P E+3 -510 8.8 40.00
16 EO 1S E-1 100 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A.1 Simone Munsterhjelm -Eliane de Ceuninck 48,53 %
17 EO 2T N = 90 4.5 20.45
18 EO 3S N-1 -100 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.8 Anne Van den Berge -Pascale Nobels 45,74 %
19 EO 4P N+1 450 5.5 25.00
20 EO 3C S = 140 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 60,35 %
21 EO 1S S = 90 1 4.55
22 EO 4T E-1 100 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.9 Giuseppe Napoli -Chantal de Lichtervelde 58,20 %
23 EO 4C E+1 -650 21.9 99.55
24 EO 2P N = 110 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A.3 Claire Derieuw -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 48,39 %
25 EO 4C E+2 -680 22 100.00
26 EO 3K W+2 -150 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A10 Sylviane Delbeke -Francoise Turin 42,58 %
27 EO 1S S = 90 5.5 25.00
28 EO 4P S+2 680 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
Total : 221,8 / 528 = 42,01 %
PAIRE a.9 Christiane Huby -Michel Lievens
A12 Hugo Baetens -Michel Lahaut 51,18 %
1 EO 3S E-4 200 0.1 0.45
2 EO 3S S+1 630 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 45,93 %
3 EO 4P S = 420 18.6 84.55
4 EO 4P W-2 200 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A13 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 42,08 %
5 EO 3P N+1 170 3.4 15.45
6 EO 4C E-1 100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A.7 Patrick Gilles -Marie J. de Wagheneire 62,41 %
7 EO 3K S+2 150 8.8 40.00
8 EO 6C W+1 -1010 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A14 Natalie van den Berg -Marie Claire Vienne 47,00 %
9 EO 2C S = 110 6.6 30.00
10 EO 5KcE-1 200 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A.1 Simone Munsterhjelm -Eliane de Ceuninck 48,53 %
13 EO 4P N+2 680 9.9 45.00
14 EO 3S E-1 50 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A.9 Giuseppe Napoli -Chantal de Lichtervelde 58,20 %
17 EO 1S S = 90 4.5 20.45
18 EO 1S N+1 120 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A.3 Claire Derieuw -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 48,39 %
19 EO 4P N+2 480 1.2 5.45
20 EO 3T N = 110 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
A10 Sylviane Delbeke -Francoise Turin 42,58 %
21 EO 2C E+2 -170 13 59.09
22 EO 3K S = 110 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.4 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier 51,05 %
23 EO 3C E+1 -170 7.7 35.00
24 EO 2P N = 110 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Fabienne Smit 53,49 %
25 EO 5C W = -650 17 77.27
26 EO 3P N-2 -200 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A.5 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry 42,77 %
27 EO 1S S-4 -200 21.9 99.55
28 EO 4P S+1 650 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 92,05 %
Total : 215,9 / 528 = 40,89 %
PAIRE a.8 Evelyn Sorel -Veronique Englebienne
A.5 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry 42,77 %
1 EO 2S E-2 100 3.4 15.45
2 EO 3S S+2 660 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 7,95 %
A12 Hugo Baetens -Michel Lahaut 51,18 %
3 EO 4P S+2 480 4.5 20.45
4 EO 3P W-2 200 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 17,95 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 45,93 %
5 EO 3S N-3 -300 21.9 99.55
6 EO 4C E-1 100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A13 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 42,08 %
7 EO 3K S+1 130 15.4 70.00
8 EO 4C W+3 -510 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
A14 Natalie van den Berg -Marie Claire Vienne 47,00 %
11 EO 2P S-1 -50 5.5 25.00
12 EO 3CcW-2 300 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 27,50 %
A.8 Anne Van den Berge -Pascale Nobels 45,74 %
15 EO 6S W = -990 17.5 79.55
16 EO 1S E-1 100 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 60,35 %
17 EO 2T N+2 130 0.1 0.45
18 EO 3S N+1 630 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 0,45 %
A.9 Giuseppe Napoli -Chantal de Lichtervelde 58,20 %
19 EO 3C S = 140 15.4 70.00
20 EO 3P E-1 100 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 67,50 %
A.3 Claire Derieuw -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 48,39 %
21 EO 2P N-1 -100 5 22.73
22 EO 4T E-1 100 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A10 Sylviane Delbeke -Francoise Turin 42,58 %
23 EO 4C E = -620 17.5 79.55
24 EO 4T S-2 -100 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.4 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier 51,05 %
25 EO 4P N-3 -150 1 4.55
26 EO 3S W = -600 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Fabienne Smit 53,49 %
27 EO 1S S+2 150 0.1 0.45
28 EO 4P S+2 680 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
Total : 196,5 / 528 = 37,22 %
PAIRE a14 -
A.8 Anne Van den Berge -Pascale Nobels 45,74 %
1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.1 Simone Munsterhjelm -Eliane de Ceuninck 48,53 %
3 EO BYE 0 0.00
4 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.9 Giuseppe Napoli -Chantal de Lichtervelde 58,20 %
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Bruno Chevalier 60,35 %
7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A10 Sylviane Delbeke -Francoise Turin 42,58 %
9 EO BYE 0 0.00
10 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.3 Claire Derieuw -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 48,39 %
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Fabienne Smit 53,49 %
13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.4 Claire Destin -Michele Berrier 51,05 %
15 EO BYE 0 0.00
16 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A12 Hugo Baetens -Michel Lahaut 51,18 %
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.5 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry 42,77 %
19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 45,93 %
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A14 Natalie van den Berg -Marie Claire Vienne 47,00 %
27 EO BYE 0 0.00
28 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 616 = 0,00 %
|