B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 62,52 A12 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe
--- 2 60,04 A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois
--- 3 59,30 A.9 Sophie Tilemans -Grazia Neuenschwander
--- 4 57,17 A.7 Nicole Blondeau -Elena Valsesia
--- 5 56,88 A.4 Patricia Bardy -Michele Berrier
--- 6 55,62 A.5 Philippe van der Gracht -Teresa Dekoster
--- 7 51,65 A.8 Sylviane Delbeke -Chantal de Lichtervelde
--- 8 51,48 A14 Philippe Leclercq -Marc Roobroeck
--- 9 47,81 A15 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski
--- 10 44,77 A10 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm
--- 11 43,81 A13 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru
--- 12 42,64 A.1 Veronique Englebienne -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse
--- 13 41,24 A.3 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson
--- 14 38,20 A.6 Monique Crouan -Benedicte Begault
--- 15 35,95 A11 Claire Rolin -Efthalia Bogaerts
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 58,81 a.8 Marc Antoine de Halloy -Jean van Caloen
--- 2 58,22 a.5 Dilva Haym -Lydia Wildiers
--- 3 56,38 a13 Patrick Gilles -Alexandre Viot
--- 4 56,04 a.7 Noelle Fosse -Marianne Falla
--- 5 52,14 a.9 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys
--- 6 51,46 a12 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten
--- 7 50,55 a10 Ines Drory -Myriam de Timary
--- 8 48,18 a.2 Jacques Podevyn -Dominique Sassen
--- 9 47,82 a14 Francine Belet -Michel Lievens
--- 10 47,03 a.3 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
--- 11 46,93 a11 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens
--- 12 43,83 a.4 Helene Schyns -Antoinette Jourdain
--- 13 41,69 a.6 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger
--- 14 41,12 a.1 Nadine Blondeau -Benedicte Lemaigre
--- 15 0,00 a15 -
PAIRE A12 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe
a.8 Marc Antoine de Halloy -Jean van Caloen 58,81 %
1 NS 1S S+1 120 9.9 45.00
2 NS 3S W+1 -430 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.7 Noelle Fosse -Marianne Falla 56,04 %
3 NS 4P S-1 -50 4.5 20.45
4 NS 3C W-2 200 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.6 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 41,69 %
5 NS 4C N-1 -100 12.1 55.00
6 NS 1S W = -90 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a.5 Dilva Haym -Lydia Wildiers 58,22 %
7 NS 2C W = -110 9.9 45.00
8 NS 3P W = -140 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.4 Helene Schyns -Antoinette Jourdain 43,83 %
9 NS 3S S+2 460 20.8 94.55
10 NS 1S E = -90 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
a.3 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 47,03 %
11 NS 4C W-1 50 6.6 30.00
12 NS 2C N+2 170 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
a.2 Jacques Podevyn -Dominique Sassen 48,18 %
13 NS 3S S+1 630 17.5 79.55
14 NS 3C E-1 50 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.1 Nadine Blondeau -Benedicte Lemaigre 41,12 %
15 NS 4P W-1 50 16.5 75.00
16 NS 3C S = 140 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
a12 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 51,46 %
23 NS 4P S = 620 17.5 79.55
24 NS 1S N+2 150 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a11 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 46,93 %
25 NS 5T E = -600 18 81.82
26 NS 2S S = 120 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
a10 Ines Drory -Myriam de Timary 50,55 %
27 NS 3P S = 140 17.5 79.55
28 NS 3S N+2 660 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
a.9 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 52,14 %
29 NS 2P W+1 -140 7.7 35.00
30 NS 3S W+2 -460 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
Total : 330,1 / 528 = 62,52 %
PAIRE A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois
a.2 Jacques Podevyn -Dominique Sassen 48,18 %
3 NS 5T N = 400 13.2 60.00
4 NS 3C W-2 200 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
a.1 Nadine Blondeau -Benedicte Lemaigre 41,12 %
5 NS 3C N = 140 17.5 79.55
6 NS 1S W-1 100 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 87,05 %
a15 - 0,00 %
7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a14 Francine Belet -Michel Lievens 47,82 %
9 NS 3S S = 400 5.5 25.00
10 NS 1S E-2 200 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a13 Patrick Gilles -Alexandre Viot 56,38 %
11 NS 4C W-2 100 13.2 60.00
12 NS 4PcE = -590 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
a12 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 51,46 %
13 NS 3S S+1 630 17.5 79.55
14 NS 3P W-3 150 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 84,55 %
a11 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 46,93 %
15 NS 3P W = -140 7.7 35.00
16 NS 5K W = -600 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 32,50 %
a10 Ines Drory -Myriam de Timary 50,55 %
17 NS 4P N = 420 3 13.64
18 NS 4K W-1 50 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.9 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 52,14 %
19 NS 3S W = -600 21.9 99.55
20 NS 4P N+2 680 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
a.8 Marc Antoine de Halloy -Jean van Caloen 58,81 %
21 NS 2C N+2 170 11 50.00
22 NS 3S W+1 -630 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a.7 Noelle Fosse -Marianne Falla 56,04 %
23 NS 4P S = 620 17.5 79.55
24 NS 1S N+2 150 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a.6 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 41,69 %
25 NS 3S E+1 -630 13 59.09
26 NS 1K S+1 90 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
Total : 290,6 / 484 = 60,04 %
PAIRE A.9 Sophie Tilemans -Grazia Neuenschwander
a.2 Jacques Podevyn -Dominique Sassen 48,18 %
1 NS 3C N = 140 17.5 79.55
2 NS 3S W+2 -460 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.1 Nadine Blondeau -Benedicte Lemaigre 41,12 %
3 NS 3S N+1 430 20.8 94.55
4 NS 2CcW-1 200 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 87,05 %
a15 - 0,00 %
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a14 Francine Belet -Michel Lievens 47,82 %
7 NS 2C W = -110 9.9 45.00
8 NS 3C S = 140 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a13 Patrick Gilles -Alexandre Viot 56,38 %
9 NS 3S N = 400 5.5 25.00
10 NS 1S E+1 -120 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a.9 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 52,14 %
17 NS 4P N+2 480 21 95.45
18 NS 4T S = 130 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 97,73 %
a.8 Marc Antoine de Halloy -Jean van Caloen 58,81 %
19 NS 4P E = -620 17.5 79.55
20 NS 4P S+2 680 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a.7 Noelle Fosse -Marianne Falla 56,04 %
21 NS 3C N+1 170 11 50.00
22 NS 3S W+2 -660 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a.6 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 41,69 %
23 NS 3P S+1 170 9.9 45.00
24 NS 1S N+3 180 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a.5 Dilva Haym -Lydia Wildiers 58,22 %
25 NS 3S W+1 -630 13 59.09
26 NS 1K S+2 110 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.4 Helene Schyns -Antoinette Jourdain 43,83 %
27 NS 4P S-2 -100 0.1 0.45
28 NS 4P S-1 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a.3 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 47,03 %
29 NS 2P W = -110 16.5 75.00
30 NS 3S W+2 -460 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
Total : 287,0 / 484 = 59,30 %
PAIRE A.7 Nicole Blondeau -Elena Valsesia
a13 Patrick Gilles -Alexandre Viot 56,38 %
1 NS 1S S+1 120 9.9 45.00
2 NS 3S W+1 -430 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a12 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 51,46 %
3 NS 6T N-1 -50 4.5 20.45
4 NS 2CcW-1 200 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a11 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 46,93 %
5 NS 4C N-1 -100 12.1 55.00
6 NS 1S W+1 -120 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a.7 Noelle Fosse -Marianne Falla 56,04 %
13 NS 3S N+1 630 17.5 79.55
14 NS 2P W-1 50 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.6 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 41,69 %
15 NS 3P W-1 50 16.5 75.00
16 NS 4T E+1 -150 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
a.5 Dilva Haym -Lydia Wildiers 58,22 %
17 NS 4P N+1 450 13 59.09
18 NS 5K W-2 100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.4 Helene Schyns -Antoinette Jourdain 43,83 %
19 NS 4P E = -620 17.5 79.55
20 NS 4P N+2 680 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a.3 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 47,03 %
21 NS 2C N+2 170 11 50.00
22 NS 3S W+1 -630 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a.2 Jacques Podevyn -Dominique Sassen 48,18 %
23 NS 4P S = 620 17.5 79.55
24 NS 1S N = 90 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.1 Nadine Blondeau -Benedicte Lemaigre 41,12 %
25 NS 3S E+1 -630 13 59.09
26 NS 1S S+2 150 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
a15 - 0,00 %
27 NS BYE 0 0.00
28 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a14 Francine Belet -Michel Lievens 47,82 %
29 NS 2P W = -110 16.5 75.00
30 NS 3S W+2 -460 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
Total : 276,7 / 484 = 57,17 %
PAIRE A.4 Patricia Bardy -Michele Berrier
a.4 Helene Schyns -Antoinette Jourdain 43,83 %
7 NS 4C W-2 200 20.8 94.55
8 NS 4KcN = 510 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 97,05 %
a.3 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 47,03 %
9 NS 3S S+1 430 13.2 60.00
10 NS 1S E = -90 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 67,50 %
a.2 Jacques Podevyn -Dominique Sassen 48,18 %
11 NS 4CcW-2 300 20.8 94.55
12 NS 2C N+2 170 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
a.1 Nadine Blondeau -Benedicte Lemaigre 41,12 %
13 NS 3S S = 600 9.9 45.00
14 NS 2C E-2 100 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a15 - 0,00 %
15 NS BYE 0 0.00
16 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a14 Francine Belet -Michel Lievens 47,82 %
17 NS 4P N+1 450 13 59.09
18 NS 5KcW-1 100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a13 Patrick Gilles -Alexandre Viot 56,38 %
19 NS 3S W+1 -630 13.2 60.00
20 NS 4P S+1 650 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a12 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 51,46 %
21 NS 4C N-1 -100 0 0.00
22 NS 3S W-1 100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a11 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 46,93 %
23 NS 4P S-1 -100 1.2 5.45
24 NS 1S N+2 150 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a10 Ines Drory -Myriam de Timary 50,55 %
25 NS 6T E-1 100 20 90.91
26 NS 1K S+1 90 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a.9 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 52,14 %
27 NS 3P S-1 -50 5.5 25.00
28 NS 4P S-2 -200 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
a.8 Marc Antoine de Halloy -Jean van Caloen 58,81 %
29 NS 2P W+1 -140 7.7 35.00
30 NS 3S W+2 -460 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
Total : 275,3 / 484 = 56,88 %
PAIRE A.5 Philippe van der Gracht -Teresa Dekoster
a.9 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 52,14 %
1 NS 1S S+1 120 9.9 45.00
2 NS 5T E = -400 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a.5 Dilva Haym -Lydia Wildiers 58,22 %
9 NS 3S S+2 460 20.8 94.55
10 NS 1S E+1 -120 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
a.4 Helene Schyns -Antoinette Jourdain 43,83 %
11 NS 4C W-1 50 6.6 30.00
12 NS 4PcE+1 -690 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
a.3 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 47,03 %
13 NS 3S S+1 630 17.5 79.55
14 NS 4P W-3 150 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 84,55 %
a.2 Jacques Podevyn -Dominique Sassen 48,18 %
15 NS 3P W+1 -170 3.4 15.45
16 NS 3C S = 140 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.1 Nadine Blondeau -Benedicte Lemaigre 41,12 %
17 NS 4P N+1 450 13 59.09
18 NS 4T S-2 -200 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a15 - 0,00 %
19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a14 Francine Belet -Michel Lievens 47,82 %
21 NS 2C N+2 170 11 50.00
22 NS 3S W = -600 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a13 Patrick Gilles -Alexandre Viot 56,38 %
23 NS 4P S = 620 17.5 79.55
24 NS 1S N-1 -50 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a12 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 51,46 %
25 NS 3S E+2 -660 4 18.18
26 NS 1K S = 70 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a11 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 46,93 %
27 NS 3P S = 140 17.5 79.55
28 NS 3S N = 600 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 84,55 %
a10 Ines Drory -Myriam de Timary 50,55 %
29 NS 3C S = 140 21.9 99.55
30 NS 3S W+1 -430 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 94,55 %
Total : 269,2 / 484 = 55,62 %
PAIRE A.8 Sylviane Delbeke -Chantal de Lichtervelde
a15 - 0,00 %
1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a14 Francine Belet -Michel Lievens 47,82 %
3 NS 3S N = 400 13.2 60.00
4 NS 3P N = 140 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a13 Patrick Gilles -Alexandre Viot 56,38 %
5 NS 4C N = 620 20.8 94.55
6 NS 1S W = -90 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a12 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 51,46 %
7 NS 2C W = -110 9.9 45.00
8 NS 4K N-2 -100 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a.8 Marc Antoine de Halloy -Jean van Caloen 58,81 %
15 NS 4P W-1 50 16.5 75.00
16 NS 3T E+3 -170 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
a.7 Noelle Fosse -Marianne Falla 56,04 %
17 NS 5P N-1 -50 0 0.00
18 NS 3K W = -110 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
a.6 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 41,69 %
19 NS 4P E+1 -650 5.5 25.00
20 NS 4P N+2 680 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.5 Dilva Haym -Lydia Wildiers 58,22 %
21 NS 2C N+2 170 11 50.00
22 NS 3S W = -600 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.4 Helene Schyns -Antoinette Jourdain 43,83 %
23 NS 1P S+3 170 9.9 45.00
24 NS 1C W-3 150 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a.3 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 47,03 %
25 NS 3S E+2 -660 4 18.18
26 NS 1K S+1 90 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a.2 Jacques Podevyn -Dominique Sassen 48,18 %
27 NS 3P S = 140 17.5 79.55
28 NS 4P S-1 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a.1 Nadine Blondeau -Benedicte Lemaigre 41,12 %
29 NS 2P W = -110 16.5 75.00
30 NS 3S W+2 -460 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
Total : 250,0 / 484 = 51,65 %
PAIRE A14 Philippe Leclercq -Marc Roobroeck
a12 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 51,46 %
1 NS 2C N+4 230 21.9 99.55
2 NS 3S W+2 -460 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a11 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 46,93 %
3 NS 3S N+1 430 20.8 94.55
4 NS 2C W-1 100 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a10 Ines Drory -Myriam de Timary 50,55 %
5 NS 4C N-2 -200 3.4 15.45
6 NS 1S W+1 -120 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 17,95 %
a.9 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 52,14 %
7 NS 4C W-2 200 20.8 94.55
8 NS 2K N = 90 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
a.8 Marc Antoine de Halloy -Jean van Caloen 58,81 %
9 NS 2S N+1 150 0.1 0.45
10 NS 1S E+1 -120 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 12,73 %
a.7 Noelle Fosse -Marianne Falla 56,04 %
11 NS 4C W-2 100 13.2 60.00
12 NS 4P W+1 -450 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
a.6 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 41,69 %
13 NS 4C S-2 -200 2.3 10.45
14 NS 1S E-1 50 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 15,45 %
a.5 Dilva Haym -Lydia Wildiers 58,22 %
15 NS 3P W-1 50 16.5 75.00
16 NS 3K W+2 -150 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
a.4 Helene Schyns -Antoinette Jourdain 43,83 %
17 NS 4P N+1 450 13 59.09
18 NS 3T S = 110 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a.3 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 47,03 %
19 NS 4P E = -620 17.5 79.55
20 NS 4P N+2 680 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a14 Francine Belet -Michel Lievens 47,82 %
27 NS 3P N-1 -50 5.5 25.00
28 NS 4K N-1 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
a13 Patrick Gilles -Alexandre Viot 56,38 %
29 NS 2P W+1 -140 7.7 35.00
30 NS 4C W = -420 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
Total : 271,8 / 528 = 51,48 %
PAIRE A15 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski
a14 Francine Belet -Michel Lievens 47,82 %
1 NS 1S S+1 120 9.9 45.00
2 NS 3S W+2 -460 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
a13 Patrick Gilles -Alexandre Viot 56,38 %
3 NS 4P S-1 -50 4.5 20.45
4 NS 2C W = -110 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
a12 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 51,46 %
5 NS 4C N-1 -100 12.1 55.00
6 NS 1S W+1 -120 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a11 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 46,93 %
7 NS 2C W = -110 9.9 45.00
8 NS 4K N-1 -50 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a10 Ines Drory -Myriam de Timary 50,55 %
9 NS 3S S+1 430 13.2 60.00
10 NS 1S E+1 -120 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a.9 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 52,14 %
11 NS 5C W-3 150 17.5 79.55
12 NS 2C N+2 170 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 82,05 %
a.8 Marc Antoine de Halloy -Jean van Caloen 58,81 %
13 NS 2S S+1 150 6.6 30.00
14 NS 2S E-3 150 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
a.7 Noelle Fosse -Marianne Falla 56,04 %
15 NS 4P W-1 50 16.5 75.00
16 NS 5CcS-2 -300 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a.6 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 41,69 %
17 NS 4P N+2 480 21 95.45
18 NS 3K W+1 -130 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.5 Dilva Haym -Lydia Wildiers 58,22 %
19 NS 4P E+1 -650 5.5 25.00
20 NS 2C N+2 170 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 12,73 %
a.4 Helene Schyns -Antoinette Jourdain 43,83 %
21 NS 4C N = 620 20 90.91
22 NS 3S W = -600 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
a15 - 0,00 %
29 NS BYE 0 0.00
30 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 231,4 / 484 = 47,81 %
PAIRE A10 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm
a.4 Helene Schyns -Antoinette Jourdain 43,83 %
1 NS 1S S+1 120 9.9 45.00
2 NS 3S W+2 -460 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
a.3 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 47,03 %
3 NS 3S N = 400 13.2 60.00
4 NS 3C W-2 200 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
a.2 Jacques Podevyn -Dominique Sassen 48,18 %
5 NS 3C N-1 -100 12.1 55.00
6 NS 1S W = -90 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a.1 Nadine Blondeau -Benedicte Lemaigre 41,12 %
7 NS 2C W+1 -140 0.1 0.45
8 NS 4K N-1 -50 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a15 - 0,00 %
9 NS BYE 0 0.00
10 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a14 Francine Belet -Michel Lievens 47,82 %
11 NS 4CcW-2 300 20.8 94.55
12 NS 3P E+1 -170 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a10 Ines Drory -Myriam de Timary 50,55 %
19 NS 4P E+1 -650 5.5 25.00
20 NS 4P N+2 680 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.9 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 52,14 %
21 NS 2C N+1 140 3 13.64
22 NS 3S W+1 -630 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
a.8 Marc Antoine de Halloy -Jean van Caloen 58,81 %
23 NS 4P S-1 -100 1.2 5.45
24 NS 1S N+1 120 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
a.7 Noelle Fosse -Marianne Falla 56,04 %
25 NS 3S E+1 -630 13 59.09
26 NS 1K S+1 90 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.6 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 41,69 %
27 NS 3S S = 400 21.9 99.55
28 NS 4P S-1 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a.5 Dilva Haym -Lydia Wildiers 58,22 %
29 NS 3C S-2 -200 1.2 5.45
30 NS 3S W+2 -460 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
Total : 216,7 / 484 = 44,77 %
PAIRE A13 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru
a10 Ines Drory -Myriam de Timary 50,55 %
1 NS 1S S = 90 1.2 5.45
2 NS 3S E+2 -460 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
a.9 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 52,14 %
3 NS 4P S = 420 17.5 79.55
4 NS 2P N-1 -100 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.8 Marc Antoine de Halloy -Jean van Caloen 58,81 %
5 NS 4C N-2 -200 3.4 15.45
6 NS 1S N-1 -50 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.7 Noelle Fosse -Marianne Falla 56,04 %
7 NS 2C W = -110 9.9 45.00
8 NS 3P W-2 100 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a.6 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 41,69 %
9 NS 3S S+1 430 13.2 60.00
10 NS 1S E = -90 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 67,50 %
a.5 Dilva Haym -Lydia Wildiers 58,22 %
11 NS 4PcN-1 -100 0.1 0.45
12 NS 4P E = -420 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
a.4 Helene Schyns -Antoinette Jourdain 43,83 %
13 NS 3S S = 600 9.9 45.00
14 NS 1S W-2 100 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.3 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 47,03 %
15 NS 4P W+1 -450 0.1 0.45
16 NS 3C N-1 -50 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a.2 Jacques Podevyn -Dominique Sassen 48,18 %
17 NS 3S N+1 430 6 27.27
18 NS 4K W+1 -150 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a13 Patrick Gilles -Alexandre Viot 56,38 %
25 NS 3S E+2 -660 4 18.18
26 NS 1K S+2 110 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a12 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 51,46 %
27 NS 2S S = 120 13.2 60.00
28 NS 4P S-1 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a11 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 46,93 %
29 NS 2P W = -110 16.5 75.00
30 NS 3S W+2 -460 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
Total : 231,3 / 528 = 43,81 %
PAIRE A.1 Veronique Englebienne -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse
a.1 Nadine Blondeau -Benedicte Lemaigre 41,12 %
1 NS 1S S+2 150 19.7 89.55
2 NS 3S W+2 -460 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
a15 - 0,00 %
3 NS BYE 0 0.00
4 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a14 Francine Belet -Michel Lievens 47,82 %
5 NS 4C N-2 -200 3.4 15.45
6 NS 1S W+1 -120 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 17,95 %
a13 Patrick Gilles -Alexandre Viot 56,38 %
7 NS 2C W = -110 9.9 45.00
8 NS 5K N-2 -100 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a12 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 51,46 %
9 NS 3S S+1 430 13.2 60.00
10 NS 1S E+1 -120 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a11 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 46,93 %
11 NS 4P N-1 -50 2.3 10.45
12 NS 4C S-1 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a10 Ines Drory -Myriam de Timary 50,55 %
13 NS 3S S+1 630 17.5 79.55
14 NS 4P W-2 100 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a.9 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 52,14 %
15 NS 3P W+1 -170 3.4 15.45
16 NS 5T E+1 -620 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 12,95 %
a.8 Marc Antoine de Halloy -Jean van Caloen 58,81 %
17 NS 4P N+1 450 13 59.09
18 NS 4K W-1 50 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.7 Noelle Fosse -Marianne Falla 56,04 %
19 NS 4P E+1 -650 5.5 25.00
20 NS 2P N+4 230 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
a.6 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 41,69 %
21 NS 4C N = 620 20 90.91
22 NS 3S W+1 -630 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.5 Dilva Haym -Lydia Wildiers 58,22 %
23 NS 4P S = 620 17.5 79.55
24 NS 1C W-3 150 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
Total : 206,4 / 484 = 42,64 %
PAIRE A.3 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson
a.3 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 47,03 %
5 NS 4C N = 620 20.8 94.55
6 NS 1S W+1 -120 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a.2 Jacques Podevyn -Dominique Sassen 48,18 %
7 NS 2C W = -110 9.9 45.00
8 NS 4C S-1 -50 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.1 Nadine Blondeau -Benedicte Lemaigre 41,12 %
9 NS 3S S+1 430 13.2 60.00
10 NS 1S E+1 -120 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a15 - 0,00 %
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a14 Francine Belet -Michel Lievens 47,82 %
13 NS 4C N-1 -100 4.5 20.45
14 NS 1S E-2 100 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a13 Patrick Gilles -Alexandre Viot 56,38 %
15 NS 3P W-1 50 16.5 75.00
16 NS 5K W+1 -620 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
a12 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 51,46 %
17 NS 4P N+1 450 13 59.09
18 NS 2P E = -110 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a11 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 46,93 %
19 NS 4P E+1 -650 5.5 25.00
20 NS 5P N+1 680 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a10 Ines Drory -Myriam de Timary 50,55 %
21 NS 4C N = 620 20 90.91
22 NS 3S W+1 -630 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.9 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 52,14 %
23 NS 1P S+2 140 6.6 30.00
24 NS 1S N = 90 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.8 Marc Antoine de Halloy -Jean van Caloen 58,81 %
25 NS 3S E+2 -660 4 18.18
26 NS 2S S-2 -200 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
a.7 Noelle Fosse -Marianne Falla 56,04 %
27 NS 2S S-1 -50 5.5 25.00
28 NS 3P S-1 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
Total : 199,6 / 484 = 41,24 %
PAIRE A.6 Monique Crouan -Benedicte Begault
a11 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 46,93 %
1 NS 1S S+1 120 9.9 45.00
2 NS 4P W-4 200 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a10 Ines Drory -Myriam de Timary 50,55 %
3 NS 4P S-1 -50 4.5 20.45
4 NS 2C W-1 100 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a.6 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 41,69 %
11 NS 4C W-2 100 13.2 60.00
12 NS 2C N+2 170 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a.5 Dilva Haym -Lydia Wildiers 58,22 %
13 NS 4P N-3 -300 0.1 0.45
14 NS 2S E+1 -150 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 0,45 %
a.4 Helene Schyns -Antoinette Jourdain 43,83 %
15 NS 3P W = -140 7.7 35.00
16 NS 5T E+1 -620 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.3 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 47,03 %
17 NS 4P N = 420 3 13.64
18 NS 5T S-2 -200 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
a.2 Jacques Podevyn -Dominique Sassen 48,18 %
19 NS 4P E+1 -650 5.5 25.00
20 NS 4P N+1 650 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a.1 Nadine Blondeau -Benedicte Lemaigre 41,12 %
21 NS 2C N+2 170 11 50.00
22 NS 3S W = -600 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a15 - 0,00 %
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a14 Francine Belet -Michel Lievens 47,82 %
25 NS 3C E-2 200 22 100.00
26 NS 2S S-1 -100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a13 Patrick Gilles -Alexandre Viot 56,38 %
27 NS 2P S = 110 11 50.00
28 NS 4P S-1 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a12 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 51,46 %
29 NS 3C S-2 -200 1.2 5.45
30 NS 3S W+2 -460 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
Total : 184,9 / 484 = 38,20 %
PAIRE A11 Claire Rolin -Efthalia Bogaerts
a.6 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 41,69 %
1 NS 1S S = 90 1.2 5.45
2 NS 4P W-2 100 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.5 Dilva Haym -Lydia Wildiers 58,22 %
3 NS 5T S-1 -50 4.5 20.45
4 NS 2C W-1 100 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a.4 Helene Schyns -Antoinette Jourdain 43,83 %
5 NS 5C N-2 -200 3.4 15.45
6 NS 1S W-1 100 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.3 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 47,03 %
7 NS 2C E = -110 9.9 45.00
8 NS 3K N-1 -50 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.2 Jacques Podevyn -Dominique Sassen 48,18 %
9 NS 1S S+3 180 2.3 10.45
10 NS 1S E = -90 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
a.1 Nadine Blondeau -Benedicte Lemaigre 41,12 %
11 NS 4C W-1 50 6.6 30.00
12 NS 2C N+1 140 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a15 - 0,00 %
13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a11 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 46,93 %
21 NS 2C N+1 140 3 13.64
22 NS 3S W = -600 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a10 Ines Drory -Myriam de Timary 50,55 %
23 NS 4C E-1 100 4.5 20.45
24 NS 1S N+1 120 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a.9 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 52,14 %
25 NS 3S E+2 -660 4 18.18
26 NS 2S S-2 -200 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
a.8 Marc Antoine de Halloy -Jean van Caloen 58,81 %
27 NS 3P S-1 -50 5.5 25.00
28 NS 3S N-2 -200 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
a.7 Noelle Fosse -Marianne Falla 56,04 %
29 NS 2P W+1 -140 7.7 35.00
30 NS 3S W+2 -460 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
Total : 174,0 / 484 = 35,95 %
PAIRE a.8 Marc Antoine de Halloy -Jean van Caloen
A12 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 62,52 %
1 EO 1S S+1 120 12.1 55.00
2 EO 3S W+1 -430 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A13 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 43,81 %
5 EO 4C N-2 -200 18.6 84.55
6 EO 1S N-1 -50 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A14 Philippe Leclercq -Marc Roobroeck 51,48 %
9 EO 2S N+1 150 21.9 99.55
10 EO 1S E+1 -120 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 87,27 %
A15 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 47,81 %
13 EO 2S S+1 150 15.4 70.00
14 EO 2S E-3 150 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
A.8 Sylviane Delbeke -Chantal de Lichtervelde 51,65 %
15 EO 4P W-1 50 5.5 25.00
16 EO 3T E+3 -170 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
A.1 Veronique Englebienne -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 42,64 %
17 EO 4P N+1 450 9 40.91
18 EO 4K W-1 50 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.9 Sophie Tilemans -Grazia Neuenschwander 59,30 %
19 EO 4P E = -620 4.5 20.45
20 EO 4P S+2 680 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 60,04 %
21 EO 2C N+2 170 11 50.00
22 EO 3S W+1 -630 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A10 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm 44,77 %
23 EO 4P S-1 -100 20.8 94.55
24 EO 1S N+1 120 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
A.3 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 41,24 %
25 EO 3S E+2 -660 18 81.82
26 EO 2S S-2 -200 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
A11 Claire Rolin -Efthalia Bogaerts 35,95 %
27 EO 3P S-1 -50 16.5 75.00
28 EO 3S N-2 -200 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
A.4 Patricia Bardy -Michele Berrier 56,88 %
29 EO 2P W+1 -140 14.3 65.00
30 EO 3S W+2 -460 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
Total : 310,5 / 528 = 58,81 %
PAIRE a.5 Dilva Haym -Lydia Wildiers
A11 Claire Rolin -Efthalia Bogaerts 35,95 %
3 EO 5T S-1 -50 17.5 79.55
4 EO 2C W-1 100 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A12 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 62,52 %
7 EO 2C W = -110 12.1 55.00
8 EO 3P W = -140 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.5 Philippe van der Gracht -Teresa Dekoster 55,62 %
9 EO 3S S+2 460 1.2 5.45
10 EO 1S E+1 -120 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
A13 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 43,81 %
11 EO 4PcN-1 -100 21.9 99.55
12 EO 4P E = -420 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
A.6 Monique Crouan -Benedicte Begault 38,20 %
13 EO 4P N-3 -300 21.9 99.55
14 EO 2S E+1 -150 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 99,55 %
A14 Philippe Leclercq -Marc Roobroeck 51,48 %
15 EO 3P W-1 50 5.5 25.00
16 EO 3K W+2 -150 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
A.7 Nicole Blondeau -Elena Valsesia 57,17 %
17 EO 4P N+1 450 9 40.91
18 EO 5K W-2 100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A15 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 47,81 %
19 EO 4P E+1 -650 16.5 75.00
20 EO 2C N+2 170 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 87,27 %
A.8 Sylviane Delbeke -Chantal de Lichtervelde 51,65 %
21 EO 2C N+2 170 11 50.00
22 EO 3S W = -600 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.1 Veronique Englebienne -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 42,64 %
23 EO 4P S = 620 4.5 20.45
24 EO 1C W-3 150 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A.9 Sophie Tilemans -Grazia Neuenschwander 59,30 %
25 EO 3S W+1 -630 9 40.91
26 EO 1K S+2 110 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A10 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm 44,77 %
29 EO 3C S-2 -200 20.8 94.55
30 EO 3S W+2 -460 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
Total : 307,4 / 528 = 58,22 %
PAIRE a13 Patrick Gilles -Alexandre Viot
A.7 Nicole Blondeau -Elena Valsesia 57,17 %
1 EO 1S S+1 120 12.1 55.00
2 EO 3S W+1 -430 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A15 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 47,81 %
3 EO 4P S-1 -50 17.5 79.55
4 EO 2C W = -110 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
A.8 Sylviane Delbeke -Chantal de Lichtervelde 51,65 %
5 EO 4C N = 620 1.2 5.45
6 EO 1S W = -90 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.1 Veronique Englebienne -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 42,64 %
7 EO 2C W = -110 12.1 55.00
8 EO 5K N-2 -100 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A.9 Sophie Tilemans -Grazia Neuenschwander 59,30 %
9 EO 3S N = 400 16.5 75.00
10 EO 1S E+1 -120 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 60,04 %
11 EO 4C W-2 100 8.8 40.00
12 EO 4PcE = -590 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A.3 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 41,24 %
15 EO 3P W-1 50 5.5 25.00
16 EO 5K W+1 -620 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
A.4 Patricia Bardy -Michele Berrier 56,88 %
19 EO 3S W+1 -630 8.8 40.00
20 EO 4P S+1 650 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A.5 Philippe van der Gracht -Teresa Dekoster 55,62 %
23 EO 4P S = 620 4.5 20.45
24 EO 1S N-1 -50 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A13 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 43,81 %
25 EO 3S E+2 -660 18 81.82
26 EO 1K S+2 110 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.6 Monique Crouan -Benedicte Begault 38,20 %
27 EO 2P S = 110 11 50.00
28 EO 4P S-1 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A14 Philippe Leclercq -Marc Roobroeck 51,48 %
29 EO 2P W+1 -140 14.3 65.00
30 EO 4C W = -420 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
Total : 297,7 / 528 = 56,38 %
PAIRE a.7 Noelle Fosse -Marianne Falla
A12 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 62,52 %
3 EO 4P S-1 -50 17.5 79.55
4 EO 3C W-2 200 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A13 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 43,81 %
7 EO 2C W = -110 12.1 55.00
8 EO 3P W-2 100 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A14 Philippe Leclercq -Marc Roobroeck 51,48 %
11 EO 4C W-2 100 8.8 40.00
12 EO 4P W+1 -450 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
A.7 Nicole Blondeau -Elena Valsesia 57,17 %
13 EO 3S N+1 630 4.5 20.45
14 EO 2P W-1 50 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A15 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 47,81 %
15 EO 4P W-1 50 5.5 25.00
16 EO 5CcS-2 -300 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A.8 Sylviane Delbeke -Chantal de Lichtervelde 51,65 %
17 EO 5P N-1 -50 22 100.00
18 EO 3K W = -110 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
A.1 Veronique Englebienne -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 42,64 %
19 EO 4P E+1 -650 16.5 75.00
20 EO 2P N+4 230 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
A.9 Sophie Tilemans -Grazia Neuenschwander 59,30 %
21 EO 3C N+1 170 11 50.00
22 EO 3S W+2 -660 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 60,04 %
23 EO 4P S = 620 4.5 20.45
24 EO 1S N+2 150 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A10 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm 44,77 %
25 EO 3S E+1 -630 9 40.91
26 EO 1K S+1 90 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.3 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 41,24 %
27 EO 2S S-1 -50 16.5 75.00
28 EO 3P S-1 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
A11 Claire Rolin -Efthalia Bogaerts 35,95 %
29 EO 2P W+1 -140 14.3 65.00
30 EO 3S W+2 -460 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
Total : 295,9 / 528 = 56,04 %
PAIRE a.9 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys
A.5 Philippe van der Gracht -Teresa Dekoster 55,62 %
1 EO 1S S+1 120 12.1 55.00
2 EO 5T E = -400 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A13 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 43,81 %
3 EO 4P S = 420 4.5 20.45
4 EO 2P N-1 -100 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A14 Philippe Leclercq -Marc Roobroeck 51,48 %
7 EO 4C W-2 200 1.2 5.45
8 EO 2K N = 90 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
A15 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 47,81 %
11 EO 5C W-3 150 4.5 20.45
12 EO 2C N+2 170 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 17,95 %
A.1 Veronique Englebienne -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 42,64 %
15 EO 3P W+1 -170 18.6 84.55
16 EO 5T E+1 -620 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 87,05 %
A.9 Sophie Tilemans -Grazia Neuenschwander 59,30 %
17 EO 4P N+2 480 1 4.55
18 EO 4T S = 130 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 2,27 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 60,04 %
19 EO 3S W = -600 0.1 0.45
20 EO 4P N+2 680 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
A10 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm 44,77 %
21 EO 2C N+1 140 19 86.36
22 EO 3S W+1 -630 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
A.3 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 41,24 %
23 EO 1P S+2 140 15.4 70.00
24 EO 1S N = 90 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A11 Claire Rolin -Efthalia Bogaerts 35,95 %
25 EO 3S E+2 -660 18 81.82
26 EO 2S S-2 -200 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
A.4 Patricia Bardy -Michele Berrier 56,88 %
27 EO 3P S-1 -50 16.5 75.00
28 EO 4P S-2 -200 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
A12 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 62,52 %
29 EO 2P W+1 -140 14.3 65.00
30 EO 3S W+2 -460 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
Total : 275,3 / 528 = 52,14 %
PAIRE a12 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten
A14 Philippe Leclercq -Marc Roobroeck 51,48 %
1 EO 2C N+4 230 0.1 0.45
2 EO 3S W+2 -460 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A.7 Nicole Blondeau -Elena Valsesia 57,17 %
3 EO 6T N-1 -50 17.5 79.55
4 EO 2CcW-1 200 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A15 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 47,81 %
5 EO 4C N-1 -100 9.9 45.00
6 EO 1S W+1 -120 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A.8 Sylviane Delbeke -Chantal de Lichtervelde 51,65 %
7 EO 2C W = -110 12.1 55.00
8 EO 4K N-2 -100 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A.1 Veronique Englebienne -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 42,64 %
9 EO 3S S+1 430 8.8 40.00
10 EO 1S E+1 -120 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 60,04 %
13 EO 3S S+1 630 4.5 20.45
14 EO 3P W-3 150 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 15,45 %
A.3 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 41,24 %
17 EO 4P N+1 450 9 40.91
18 EO 2P E = -110 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.4 Patricia Bardy -Michele Berrier 56,88 %
21 EO 4C N-1 -100 22 100.00
22 EO 3S W-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A12 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 62,52 %
23 EO 4P S = 620 4.5 20.45
24 EO 1S N+2 150 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A.5 Philippe van der Gracht -Teresa Dekoster 55,62 %
25 EO 3S E+2 -660 18 81.82
26 EO 1K S = 70 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A13 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 43,81 %
27 EO 2S S = 120 8.8 40.00
28 EO 4P S-1 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.6 Monique Crouan -Benedicte Begault 38,20 %
29 EO 3C S-2 -200 20.8 94.55
30 EO 3S W+2 -460 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
Total : 271,7 / 528 = 51,46 %
PAIRE a10 Ines Drory -Myriam de Timary
A13 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 43,81 %
1 EO 1S S = 90 20.8 94.55
2 EO 3S E+2 -460 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
A.6 Monique Crouan -Benedicte Begault 38,20 %
3 EO 4P S-1 -50 17.5 79.55
4 EO 2C W-1 100 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A14 Philippe Leclercq -Marc Roobroeck 51,48 %
5 EO 4C N-2 -200 18.6 84.55
6 EO 1S W+1 -120 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 82,05 %
A15 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 47,81 %
9 EO 3S S+1 430 8.8 40.00
10 EO 1S E+1 -120 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A.1 Veronique Englebienne -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 42,64 %
13 EO 3S S+1 630 4.5 20.45
14 EO 4P W-2 100 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 60,04 %
17 EO 4P N = 420 19 86.36
18 EO 4K W-1 50 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A10 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm 44,77 %
19 EO 4P E+1 -650 16.5 75.00
20 EO 4P N+2 680 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.3 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 41,24 %
21 EO 4C N = 620 2 9.09
22 EO 3S W+1 -630 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A11 Claire Rolin -Efthalia Bogaerts 35,95 %
23 EO 4C E-1 100 17.5 79.55
24 EO 1S N+1 120 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A.4 Patricia Bardy -Michele Berrier 56,88 %
25 EO 6T E-1 100 2 9.09
26 EO 1K S+1 90 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A12 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 62,52 %
27 EO 3P S = 140 4.5 20.45
28 EO 3S N+2 660 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
A.5 Philippe van der Gracht -Teresa Dekoster 55,62 %
29 EO 3C S = 140 0.1 0.45
30 EO 3S W+1 -430 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 5,45 %
Total : 266,9 / 528 = 50,55 %
PAIRE a.2 Jacques Podevyn -Dominique Sassen
A.9 Sophie Tilemans -Grazia Neuenschwander 59,30 %
1 EO 3C N = 140 4.5 20.45
2 EO 3S W+2 -460 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 60,04 %
3 EO 5T N = 400 8.8 40.00
4 EO 3C W-2 200 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
A10 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm 44,77 %
5 EO 3C N-1 -100 9.9 45.00
6 EO 1S W = -90 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A.3 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 41,24 %
7 EO 2C W = -110 12.1 55.00
8 EO 4C S-1 -50 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A11 Claire Rolin -Efthalia Bogaerts 35,95 %
9 EO 1S S+3 180 19.7 89.55
10 EO 1S E = -90 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
A.4 Patricia Bardy -Michele Berrier 56,88 %
11 EO 4CcW-2 300 1.2 5.45
12 EO 2C N+2 170 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
A12 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 62,52 %
13 EO 3S S+1 630 4.5 20.45
14 EO 3C E-1 50 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.5 Philippe van der Gracht -Teresa Dekoster 55,62 %
15 EO 3P W+1 -170 18.6 84.55
16 EO 3C S = 140 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A13 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 43,81 %
17 EO 3S N+1 430 16 72.73
18 EO 4K W+1 -150 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.6 Monique Crouan -Benedicte Begault 38,20 %
19 EO 4P E+1 -650 16.5 75.00
20 EO 4P N+1 650 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A.7 Nicole Blondeau -Elena Valsesia 57,17 %
23 EO 4P S = 620 4.5 20.45
24 EO 1S N = 90 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.8 Sylviane Delbeke -Chantal de Lichtervelde 51,65 %
27 EO 3P S = 140 4.5 20.45
28 EO 4P S-1 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
Total : 254,4 / 528 = 48,18 %
PAIRE a14 Francine Belet -Michel Lievens
A15 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 47,81 %
1 EO 1S S+1 120 12.1 55.00
2 EO 3S W+2 -460 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
A.8 Sylviane Delbeke -Chantal de Lichtervelde 51,65 %
3 EO 3S N = 400 8.8 40.00
4 EO 3P N = 140 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.1 Veronique Englebienne -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 42,64 %
5 EO 4C N-2 -200 18.6 84.55
6 EO 1S W+1 -120 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 82,05 %
A.9 Sophie Tilemans -Grazia Neuenschwander 59,30 %
7 EO 2C W = -110 12.1 55.00
8 EO 3C S = 140 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 60,04 %
9 EO 3S S = 400 16.5 75.00
10 EO 1S E-2 200 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A10 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm 44,77 %
11 EO 4CcW-2 300 1.2 5.45
12 EO 3P E+1 -170 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A.3 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 41,24 %
13 EO 4C N-1 -100 17.5 79.55
14 EO 1S E-2 100 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A.4 Patricia Bardy -Michele Berrier 56,88 %
17 EO 4P N+1 450 9 40.91
18 EO 5KcW-1 100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.5 Philippe van der Gracht -Teresa Dekoster 55,62 %
21 EO 2C N+2 170 11 50.00
22 EO 3S W = -600 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.6 Monique Crouan -Benedicte Begault 38,20 %
25 EO 3C E-2 200 0 0.00
26 EO 2S S-1 -100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A14 Philippe Leclercq -Marc Roobroeck 51,48 %
27 EO 3P N-1 -50 16.5 75.00
28 EO 4K N-1 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
A.7 Nicole Blondeau -Elena Valsesia 57,17 %
29 EO 2P W = -110 5.5 25.00
30 EO 3S W+2 -460 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
Total : 252,5 / 528 = 47,82 %
PAIRE a.3 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
A10 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm 44,77 %
3 EO 3S N = 400 8.8 40.00
4 EO 3C W-2 200 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
A.3 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 41,24 %
5 EO 4C N = 620 1.2 5.45
6 EO 1S W+1 -120 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A11 Claire Rolin -Efthalia Bogaerts 35,95 %
7 EO 2C E = -110 12.1 55.00
8 EO 3K N-1 -50 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.4 Patricia Bardy -Michele Berrier 56,88 %
9 EO 3S S+1 430 8.8 40.00
10 EO 1S E = -90 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 32,50 %
A12 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 62,52 %
11 EO 4C W-1 50 15.4 70.00
12 EO 2C N+2 170 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
A.5 Philippe van der Gracht -Teresa Dekoster 55,62 %
13 EO 3S S+1 630 4.5 20.45
14 EO 4P W-3 150 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 15,45 %
A13 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 43,81 %
15 EO 4P W+1 -450 21.9 99.55
16 EO 3C N-1 -50 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A.6 Monique Crouan -Benedicte Begault 38,20 %
17 EO 4P N = 420 19 86.36
18 EO 5T S-2 -200 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
A14 Philippe Leclercq -Marc Roobroeck 51,48 %
19 EO 4P E = -620 4.5 20.45
20 EO 4P N+2 680 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A.7 Nicole Blondeau -Elena Valsesia 57,17 %
21 EO 2C N+2 170 11 50.00
22 EO 3S W+1 -630 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A.8 Sylviane Delbeke -Chantal de Lichtervelde 51,65 %
25 EO 3S E+2 -660 18 81.82
26 EO 1K S+1 90 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A.9 Sophie Tilemans -Grazia Neuenschwander 59,30 %
29 EO 2P W = -110 5.5 25.00
30 EO 3S W+2 -460 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
Total : 248,3 / 528 = 47,03 %
PAIRE a11 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens
A.6 Monique Crouan -Benedicte Begault 38,20 %
1 EO 1S S+1 120 12.1 55.00
2 EO 4P W-4 200 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A14 Philippe Leclercq -Marc Roobroeck 51,48 %
3 EO 3S N+1 430 1.2 5.45
4 EO 2C W-1 100 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A.7 Nicole Blondeau -Elena Valsesia 57,17 %
5 EO 4C N-1 -100 9.9 45.00
6 EO 1S W+1 -120 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A15 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 47,81 %
7 EO 2C W = -110 12.1 55.00
8 EO 4K N-1 -50 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.1 Veronique Englebienne -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 42,64 %
11 EO 4P N-1 -50 19.7 89.55
12 EO 4C S-1 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 60,04 %
15 EO 3P W = -140 14.3 65.00
16 EO 5K W = -600 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 67,50 %
A.3 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 41,24 %
19 EO 4P E+1 -650 16.5 75.00
20 EO 5P N+1 680 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A11 Claire Rolin -Efthalia Bogaerts 35,95 %
21 EO 2C N+1 140 19 86.36
22 EO 3S W = -600 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.4 Patricia Bardy -Michele Berrier 56,88 %
23 EO 4P S-1 -100 20.8 94.55
24 EO 1S N+2 150 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A12 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 62,52 %
25 EO 5T E = -600 4 18.18
26 EO 2S S = 120 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
A.5 Philippe van der Gracht -Teresa Dekoster 55,62 %
27 EO 3P S = 140 4.5 20.45
28 EO 3S N = 600 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 15,45 %
A13 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 43,81 %
29 EO 2P W = -110 5.5 25.00
30 EO 3S W+2 -460 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
Total : 247,8 / 528 = 46,93 %
PAIRE a.4 Helene Schyns -Antoinette Jourdain
A10 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm 44,77 %
1 EO 1S S+1 120 12.1 55.00
2 EO 3S W+2 -460 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
A11 Claire Rolin -Efthalia Bogaerts 35,95 %
5 EO 5C N-2 -200 18.6 84.55
6 EO 1S W-1 100 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.4 Patricia Bardy -Michele Berrier 56,88 %
7 EO 4C W-2 200 1.2 5.45
8 EO 4KcN = 510 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 2,95 %
A12 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 62,52 %
9 EO 3S S+2 460 1.2 5.45
10 EO 1S E = -90 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
A.5 Philippe van der Gracht -Teresa Dekoster 55,62 %
11 EO 4C W-1 50 15.4 70.00
12 EO 4PcE+1 -690 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
A13 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 43,81 %
13 EO 3S S = 600 12.1 55.00
14 EO 1S W-2 100 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.6 Monique Crouan -Benedicte Begault 38,20 %
15 EO 3P W = -140 14.3 65.00
16 EO 5T E+1 -620 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A14 Philippe Leclercq -Marc Roobroeck 51,48 %
17 EO 4P N+1 450 9 40.91
18 EO 3T S = 110 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A.7 Nicole Blondeau -Elena Valsesia 57,17 %
19 EO 4P E = -620 4.5 20.45
20 EO 4P N+2 680 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A15 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 47,81 %
21 EO 4C N = 620 2 9.09
22 EO 3S W = -600 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
A.8 Sylviane Delbeke -Chantal de Lichtervelde 51,65 %
23 EO 1P S+3 170 12.1 55.00
24 EO 1C W-3 150 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A.9 Sophie Tilemans -Grazia Neuenschwander 59,30 %
27 EO 4P S-2 -100 21.9 99.55
28 EO 4P S-1 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
Total : 231,4 / 528 = 43,83 %
PAIRE a.6 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger
A11 Claire Rolin -Efthalia Bogaerts 35,95 %
1 EO 1S S = 90 20.8 94.55
2 EO 4P W-2 100 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A12 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 62,52 %
5 EO 4C N-1 -100 9.9 45.00
6 EO 1S W = -90 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A13 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Alyona Pascaru 43,81 %
9 EO 3S S+1 430 8.8 40.00
10 EO 1S E = -90 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 32,50 %
A.6 Monique Crouan -Benedicte Begault 38,20 %
11 EO 4C W-2 100 8.8 40.00
12 EO 2C N+2 170 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A14 Philippe Leclercq -Marc Roobroeck 51,48 %
13 EO 4C S-2 -200 19.7 89.55
14 EO 1S E-1 50 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 84,55 %
A.7 Nicole Blondeau -Elena Valsesia 57,17 %
15 EO 3P W-1 50 5.5 25.00
16 EO 4T E+1 -150 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
A15 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 47,81 %
17 EO 4P N+2 480 1 4.55
18 EO 3K W+1 -130 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.8 Sylviane Delbeke -Chantal de Lichtervelde 51,65 %
19 EO 4P E+1 -650 16.5 75.00
20 EO 4P N+2 680 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.1 Veronique Englebienne -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 42,64 %
21 EO 4C N = 620 2 9.09
22 EO 3S W+1 -630 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.9 Sophie Tilemans -Grazia Neuenschwander 59,30 %
23 EO 3P S+1 170 12.1 55.00
24 EO 1S N+3 180 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 60,04 %
25 EO 3S E+1 -630 9 40.91
26 EO 1K S+1 90 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A10 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm 44,77 %
27 EO 3S S = 400 0.1 0.45
28 EO 4P S-1 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
Total : 220,1 / 528 = 41,69 %
PAIRE a.1 Nadine Blondeau -Benedicte Lemaigre
A.1 Veronique Englebienne -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 42,64 %
1 EO 1S S+2 150 2.3 10.45
2 EO 3S W+2 -460 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
A.9 Sophie Tilemans -Grazia Neuenschwander 59,30 %
3 EO 3S N+1 430 1.2 5.45
4 EO 2CcW-1 200 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 12,95 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 60,04 %
5 EO 3C N = 140 4.5 20.45
6 EO 1S W-1 100 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 12,95 %
A10 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm 44,77 %
7 EO 2C W+1 -140 21.9 99.55
8 EO 4K N-1 -50 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.3 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 41,24 %
9 EO 3S S+1 430 8.8 40.00
10 EO 1S E+1 -120 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A11 Claire Rolin -Efthalia Bogaerts 35,95 %
11 EO 4C W-1 50 15.4 70.00
12 EO 2C N+1 140 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.4 Patricia Bardy -Michele Berrier 56,88 %
13 EO 3S S = 600 12.1 55.00
14 EO 2C E-2 100 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A12 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 62,52 %
15 EO 4P W-1 50 5.5 25.00
16 EO 3C S = 140 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
A.5 Philippe van der Gracht -Teresa Dekoster 55,62 %
17 EO 4P N+1 450 9 40.91
18 EO 4T S-2 -200 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A.6 Monique Crouan -Benedicte Begault 38,20 %
21 EO 2C N+2 170 11 50.00
22 EO 3S W = -600 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.7 Nicole Blondeau -Elena Valsesia 57,17 %
25 EO 3S E+1 -630 9 40.91
26 EO 1S S+2 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
A.8 Sylviane Delbeke -Chantal de Lichtervelde 51,65 %
29 EO 2P W = -110 5.5 25.00
30 EO 3S W+2 -460 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
Total : 217,1 / 528 = 41,12 %
PAIRE a15 -
A.8 Sylviane Delbeke -Chantal de Lichtervelde 51,65 %
1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.1 Veronique Englebienne -Colette van Nieuwenhuyse 42,64 %
3 EO BYE 0 0.00
4 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.9 Sophie Tilemans -Grazia Neuenschwander 59,30 %
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 60,04 %
7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A10 Colette Heerinckx -Simone Munsterhjelm 44,77 %
9 EO BYE 0 0.00
10 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.3 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 41,24 %
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A11 Claire Rolin -Efthalia Bogaerts 35,95 %
13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.4 Patricia Bardy -Michele Berrier 56,88 %
15 EO BYE 0 0.00
16 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.5 Philippe van der Gracht -Teresa Dekoster 55,62 %
19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.6 Monique Crouan -Benedicte Begault 38,20 %
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.7 Nicole Blondeau -Elena Valsesia 57,17 %
27 EO BYE 0 0.00
28 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A15 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 47,81 %
29 EO BYE 0 0.00
30 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 660 = 0,00 %
|