B.C.O.B.
Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 67,22 B.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Giuseppe Napoli
--- 2 63,75 A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Noelle Fosse
--- 3 59,86 A.3 Gaetan van de Werve -Hugo Baetens
--- 4 59,17 A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Martine Zens
--- 5 55,56 B.5 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski
--- 6 53,89 B.7 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe
--- 7 52,92 A.9 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois
--- 8 51,11 A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Francoise Turin
--- 9 49,72 B.2 Marguerite Verstraeten -Germaine Anciaux
--- 10 49,17 A.6 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy
--- 11 47,92 B.8 Elena Valsesia -Nicole Blondeau
--- 12 47,50 A.4 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens
--- 13 45,83 A10 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst
--- 14 45,69 B.9 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren
--- 15 44,86 A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Grazia Neuenschwander
--- ~ 44,86 A.8 Michele Berrier -Christiane Huby
--- 17 42,50 B10 Didier Collart -Gerard Cooreman
--- 18 40,83 B.1 Brigitte Velge -Benedicte Lemaigre
--- 19 39,17 B.4 Claire Derieuw -Prisca Tondreau
--- 20 38,47 B.6 Brigitte Brusselmans -Michel Léonard
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 61,94 a.7 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels
--- 2 60,14 b.4 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
--- 3 59,58 a.8 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige
--- 4 58,47 b.8 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver
--- 5 55,42 a.6 Miguel del Marmol -Gaetan Collinet
--- 6 54,72 b.3 Serge Alard -Patrick Gilles
--- 7 52,64 a.2 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory
--- 8 51,67 b.2 Nicolas de Neve -Olivier Paternostre
--- 9 51,67 b10 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger
--- 10 51,53 b.7 Anne Arsac -Sandra Dallemagne
--- 11 51,25 b.5 Caroll Pucher -Nicole Louette
--- 12 51,11 b.1 Helene Schyns -Antoinette Jourdain
--- 13 48,19 a.5 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
--- 14 48,06 b.6 Simone Munsterhjelm -Colette Heerinckx
--- 15 42,22 a.1 Liliane Baptista -Jacques Podevyn
--- ~ 42,08 a.9 Fabienne Smit -Thierry de Thibault
--- 17 41,39 a.4 Laurence del Marmol -Marie Christine Meeus
--- 18 40,42 b.9 Veronique Englebienne -Marianne Borsu
--- 19 40,14 a10 Andre Delacroix -Frédérique Pirlot
--- 20 37,36 a.3 Jeanine Bontemps -Aida Zumot
PAIRE B.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Giuseppe Napoli
b.3 Serge Alard -Patrick Gilles 54,72 %
7 NS 4PcN = 790 30 100.00
8 NS 4C W = -420 16 53.33
9 NS 4C N = 420 29 96.67 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
b.2 Nicolas de Neve -Olivier Paternostre 51,67 %
10 NS 2C E-1 100 20 66.67
11 NS 2C S-1 -50 12 40.00
12 NS 5C N = 650 24 80.00 µ Tbl = 62,22 %
b.1 Helene Schyns -Antoinette Jourdain 51,11 %
13 NS 3S W-2 200 15 50.00
14 NS 3P N-3 -150 13 43.33
15 NS 2P E+1 -140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,11 %
b10 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 51,67 %
16 NS 2C N+1 140 19 63.33
17 NS 2P S = 110 27 90.00
18 NS 4C N+2 680 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
b.9 Veronique Englebienne -Marianne Borsu 40,42 %
19 NS 4C W-3 300 30 100.00
20 NS 4KcE-1 200 27 90.00
21 NS 4P W+1 -450 11 36.67 µ Tbl = 75,56 %
b.7 Anne Arsac -Sandra Dallemagne 51,53 %
22 NS 2P S = 110 8 26.67
23 NS 4P E+2 -680 22 73.33
24 NS 4CcW-2 300 28 93.33 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
b.6 Simone Munsterhjelm -Colette Heerinckx 48,06 %
25 NS 4P W-1 100 30 100.00
26 NS 2S W+1 -150 27 90.00
27 NS 4C W = -420 18 60.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
b.5 Caroll Pucher -Nicole Louette 51,25 %
28 NS 2P W-3 150 17 56.67
29 NS 3S N = 600 21 70.00
30 NS 3S W = -400 23 76.67 µ Tbl = 67,78 %
Total : 484,0 / 720 = 67,22 %
PAIRE A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Noelle Fosse
a.3 Jeanine Bontemps -Aida Zumot 37,36 %
1 NS 3P E-2 100 18 60.00
2 NS 3S S = 600 24 80.00
3 NS 3S W+3 -690 4 13.33 µ Tbl = 51,11 %
a.1 Liliane Baptista -Jacques Podevyn 42,22 %
4 NS 1T N+2 110 21 70.00
5 NS 3S S = 600 28 93.33
6 NS 4C W-1 100 27 90.00 µ Tbl = 84,44 %
a10 Andre Delacroix -Frédérique Pirlot 40,14 %
7 NS 2P N+3 200 19 63.33
8 NS 4PcS-2 -300 21 70.00
9 NS 4C N = 420 29 96.67 µ Tbl = 76,67 %
a.9 Fabienne Smit -Thierry de Thibault 42,08 %
10 NS 4C E-2 200 28 93.33
11 NS 3P E-1 50 20 66.67
12 NS 4C N+1 650 24 80.00 µ Tbl = 80,00 %
a.7 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 61,94 %
19 NS 3S E+2 -660 2 6.67
20 NS 2P W = -110 11 36.67
21 NS 4P W+1 -450 11 36.67 µ Tbl = 26,67 %
a.6 Miguel del Marmol -Gaetan Collinet 55,42 %
22 NS 3S S = 400 30 100.00
23 NS 4P E+2 -680 22 73.33
24 NS 4CcW-2 300 28 93.33 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
a.5 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 48,19 %
25 NS 3C S-1 -50 26 86.67
26 NS 3S W = -600 5 16.67
27 NS 5S W = -460 7 23.33 µ Tbl = 42,22 %
a.4 Laurence del Marmol -Marie Christine Meeus 41,39 %
28 NS 1S S+2 150 17 56.67
29 NS 3S N = 600 21 70.00
30 NS 5T W+1 -420 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
Total : 459,0 / 720 = 63,75 %
PAIRE A.3 Gaetan van de Werve -Hugo Baetens
a.3 Jeanine Bontemps -Aida Zumot 37,36 %
7 NS 4P N = 620 28 93.33
8 NS 4PcS-2 -300 21 70.00
9 NS 4C S-1 -50 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
a.2 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 52,64 %
10 NS 4C E-1 100 20 66.67
11 NS 3C S-2 -100 6 20.00
12 NS 6C N-1 -100 4 13.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.1 Liliane Baptista -Jacques Podevyn 42,22 %
13 NS 3S W-3 300 25 83.33
14 NS 3P N-3 -150 13 43.33
15 NS 2C S = 110 21 70.00 µ Tbl = 65,56 %
a10 Andre Delacroix -Frédérique Pirlot 40,14 %
16 NS 2P E = -110 3 10.00
17 NS 3K N-2 -100 5 16.67
18 NS 5C S+1 680 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
a.9 Fabienne Smit -Thierry de Thibault 42,08 %
19 NS 4P S-1 -50 26 86.67
20 NS 4P W-2 200 27 90.00
21 NS 4P W = -420 25 83.33 µ Tbl = 86,67 %
a.7 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 61,94 %
22 NS 2P S+1 140 19 63.33
23 NS 6P E+1 -1460 1 3.33
24 NS 3P S-1 -50 8 26.67 µ Tbl = 31,11 %
a.6 Miguel del Marmol -Gaetan Collinet 55,42 %
25 NS 5T N-1 -50 26 86.67
26 NS 2S E-1 100 30 100.00
27 NS 3S E+1 -430 12 40.00 µ Tbl = 75,56 %
a.5 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 48,19 %
28 NS 3S N = 600 29 96.67
29 NS 3S N = 600 21 70.00
30 NS 3T W+3 -170 28 93.33 µ Tbl = 86,67 %
Total : 431,0 / 720 = 59,86 %
PAIRE A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Martine Zens
a.2 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 52,64 %
4 NS 2S S = 120 26 86.67
5 NS 2P W = -110 3 10.00
6 NS 2C W+2 -170 8 26.67 µ Tbl = 41,11 %
a.1 Liliane Baptista -Jacques Podevyn 42,22 %
7 NS 2P N+2 170 6 20.00
8 NS 4K E-1 50 29 96.67
9 NS 3C S+1 170 26 86.67 µ Tbl = 67,78 %
a10 Andre Delacroix -Frédérique Pirlot 40,14 %
10 NS 2C E-1 100 20 66.67
11 NS 1S E-2 100 27 90.00
12 NS 3S S-3 -300 1 3.33 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
a.9 Fabienne Smit -Thierry de Thibault 42,08 %
13 NS 3S W-3 300 25 83.33
14 NS 3C W = -140 18 60.00
15 NS 3P E-2 100 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
a.8 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 59,58 %
16 NS 3C S+1 170 25 83.33
17 NS 3C W-3 150 30 100.00
18 NS 4C N+2 680 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 80,00 %
a.6 Miguel del Marmol -Gaetan Collinet 55,42 %
19 NS 4C E+2 -680 0 0.00
20 NS 3P W = -140 8 26.67
21 NS 3S W+1 -430 22 73.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.5 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 48,19 %
22 NS 2P S+1 140 19 63.33
23 NS 4P E+2 -680 22 73.33
24 NS 2C W-1 50 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
a.4 Laurence del Marmol -Marie Christine Meeus 41,39 %
25 NS 3P W+1 -170 19 63.33
26 NS 1S W+3 -180 20 66.67
27 NS 3S E = -400 25 83.33 µ Tbl = 71,11 %
Total : 426,0 / 720 = 59,17 %
PAIRE B.5 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski
b.8 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver 58,47 %
1 NS 2K S+2 130 24 80.00
2 NS 3S S-1 -100 10 33.33
3 NS 4C E+2 -680 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
b.7 Anne Arsac -Sandra Dallemagne 51,53 %
4 NS 2S N+1 150 28 93.33
5 NS 2S S+1 150 24 80.00
6 NS 4C W = -620 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 57,78 %
b.5 Caroll Pucher -Nicole Louette 51,25 %
13 NS 3S E-2 200 15 50.00
14 NS 4C W-1 50 29 96.67
15 NS 2C S-1 -100 3 10.00 µ Tbl = 52,22 %
b.4 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 60,14 %
16 NS 4C N = 420 29 96.67
17 NS 3T E-1 50 17 56.67
18 NS 5C S+1 680 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
b.3 Serge Alard -Patrick Gilles 54,72 %
19 NS 3C E+1 -170 13 43.33
20 NS 3S W = -600 3 10.00
21 NS 4P W+1 -450 11 36.67 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
b.2 Nicolas de Neve -Olivier Paternostre 51,67 %
22 NS 4P S-1 -50 3 10.00
23 NS 4P E+3 -710 13 43.33
24 NS 1S S+2 150 23 76.67 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
b.1 Helene Schyns -Antoinette Jourdain 51,11 %
25 NS 3P W+1 -170 19 63.33
26 NS 1S W+4 -210 11 36.67
27 NS 3S E = -400 25 83.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
b.9 Veronique Englebienne -Marianne Borsu 40,42 %
28 NS 3S S = 600 29 96.67
29 NS 3S N = 600 21 70.00
30 NS 5T W+1 -420 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 73,33 %
Total : 400,0 / 720 = 55,56 %
PAIRE B.7 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe
b.3 Serge Alard -Patrick Gilles 54,72 %
1 NS 2P E-1 50 12 40.00
2 NS 3S S = 600 24 80.00
3 NS 4C E+2 -680 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 58,89 %
b.1 Helene Schyns -Antoinette Jourdain 51,11 %
4 NS 1T N+1 90 12 40.00
5 NS 2P W = -110 3 10.00
6 NS 3C W+1 -170 8 26.67 µ Tbl = 25,56 %
b10 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 51,67 %
7 NS 3P N+2 200 19 63.33
8 NS 4C W = -420 16 53.33
9 NS 4C S-1 -50 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
b.9 Veronique Englebienne -Marianne Borsu 40,42 %
10 NS 4C E = -620 1 3.33
11 NS 2P E-3 150 30 100.00
12 NS 4P W-3 150 15 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,11 %
b.7 Anne Arsac -Sandra Dallemagne 51,53 %
19 NS 2P S = 110 28 93.33
20 NS 4P W-2 200 27 90.00
21 NS 4P W+1 -450 11 36.67 µ Tbl = 73,33 %
b.6 Simone Munsterhjelm -Colette Heerinckx 48,06 %
22 NS 2P S+1 140 19 63.33
23 NS 4P E+2 -680 22 73.33
24 NS 3S S-1 -50 8 26.67 µ Tbl = 54,44 %
b.5 Caroll Pucher -Nicole Louette 51,25 %
25 NS 4P W = -620 9 30.00
26 NS 1S W+4 -210 11 36.67
27 NS 6C W-3 150 30 100.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
b.4 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 60,14 %
28 NS 1P W-1 50 5 16.67
29 NS 3S N+1 630 29 96.67
30 NS 5T W+1 -420 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 388,0 / 720 = 53,89 %
PAIRE A.9 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois
a.7 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 61,94 %
1 NS 3C N = 140 26 86.67
2 NS 3S S-1 -100 10 33.33
3 NS 4C E+2 -680 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 58,89 %
a.6 Miguel del Marmol -Gaetan Collinet 55,42 %
4 NS 1T N = 70 5 16.67
5 NS 4C N = 620 30 100.00
6 NS 3C W = -140 19 63.33 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a.5 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 48,19 %
7 NS 2P N+3 200 19 63.33
8 NS 4C W+1 -450 7 23.33
9 NS 4C S-2 -100 8 26.67 µ Tbl = 37,78 %
a.3 Jeanine Bontemps -Aida Zumot 37,36 %
10 NS 3C E = -140 10 33.33
11 NS 2P E-1 50 20 66.67
12 NS 4C N+1 650 24 80.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a.2 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 52,64 %
13 NS 3S W-4 400 30 100.00
14 NS 3P N-2 -100 23 76.67
15 NS 3P E-2 100 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 74,44 %
a.1 Liliane Baptista -Jacques Podevyn 42,22 %
16 NS 4C N-1 -50 10 33.33
17 NS 2T E = -90 8 26.67
18 NS 4C N+2 680 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.9 Fabienne Smit -Thierry de Thibault 42,08 %
25 NS 4P W = -620 9 30.00
26 NS 3S W = -600 5 16.67
27 NS 4C W = -420 18 60.00 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
a.8 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 59,58 %
28 NS 3S S-5 -500 0 0.00
29 NS 3S N+1 630 29 96.67
30 NS 3S E = -400 23 76.67 µ Tbl = 57,78 %
Total : 381,0 / 720 = 52,92 %
PAIRE A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Francoise Turin
a.8 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 59,58 %
1 NS 3K S-1 -50 5 16.67
2 NS 3S S-1 -100 10 33.33
3 NS 3S E+3 -690 4 13.33 µ Tbl = 21,11 %
a.7 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 61,94 %
4 NS 1T N+1 90 12 40.00
5 NS 2S S+1 150 24 80.00
6 NS 3C W+1 -170 8 26.67 µ Tbl = 48,89 %
a.5 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 48,19 %
13 NS 3S W-2 200 15 50.00
14 NS 3P N-2 -100 23 76.67
15 NS 4P E-2 100 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 57,78 %
a.4 Laurence del Marmol -Marie Christine Meeus 41,39 %
16 NS 4C N = 420 29 96.67
17 NS 2P S = 110 27 90.00
18 NS 4C S+2 680 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 81,11 %
a.3 Jeanine Bontemps -Aida Zumot 37,36 %
19 NS 2C E+2 -170 13 43.33
20 NS 3S W-1 100 18 60.00
21 NS 4P W+1 -450 11 36.67 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
a.2 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 52,64 %
22 NS 4P S-1 -50 3 10.00
23 NS 4P E+2 -680 22 73.33
24 NS 3S S-1 -50 8 26.67 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
a.1 Liliane Baptista -Jacques Podevyn 42,22 %
25 NS 4P W = -620 9 30.00
26 NS 2P E+2 -170 24 80.00
27 NS 2C W+1 -140 28 93.33 µ Tbl = 67,78 %
a.9 Fabienne Smit -Thierry de Thibault 42,08 %
28 NS 1K W-3 150 17 56.67
29 NS 3S N = 600 21 70.00
30 NS 3S W+3 -490 6 20.00 µ Tbl = 48,89 %
Total : 368,0 / 720 = 51,11 %
PAIRE B.2 Marguerite Verstraeten -Germaine Anciaux
b.2 Nicolas de Neve -Olivier Paternostre 51,67 %
4 NS 1T N+1 90 12 40.00
5 NS 2S S+1 150 24 80.00
6 NS 2C W+2 -170 8 26.67 µ Tbl = 48,89 %
b.1 Helene Schyns -Antoinette Jourdain 51,11 %
7 NS 3C S+2 200 19 63.33
8 NS 3K E+1 -130 26 86.67
9 NS 4C S-3 -150 3 10.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
b10 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 51,67 %
10 NS 4C E-1 100 20 66.67
11 NS 2P E-1 50 20 66.67
12 NS 3P W-1 50 8 26.67 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
b.9 Veronique Englebienne -Marianne Borsu 40,42 %
13 NS 3S W-3 300 25 83.33
14 NS 4P N-1 -50 26 86.67
15 NS 3S W-4 200 30 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,00 %
b.8 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver 58,47 %
16 NS 4C N-3 -150 0 0.00
17 NS 3T E-1 50 17 56.67
18 NS 5C S+1 680 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 37,78 %
b.6 Simone Munsterhjelm -Colette Heerinckx 48,06 %
19 NS 2C E+1 -140 21 70.00
20 NS 3S W = -600 3 10.00
21 NS 4P W = -420 25 83.33 µ Tbl = 54,44 %
b.5 Caroll Pucher -Nicole Louette 51,25 %
22 NS 2P S+1 140 19 63.33
23 NS 6P E = -1430 7 23.33
24 NS 3C W-1 50 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
b.4 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 60,14 %
25 NS 4P W = -620 9 30.00
26 NS 3S W+1 -630 2 6.67
27 NS 3S E+3 -490 1 3.33 µ Tbl = 13,33 %
Total : 358,0 / 720 = 49,72 %
PAIRE A.6 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy
a10 Andre Delacroix -Frédérique Pirlot 40,14 %
1 NS 3P E-2 100 18 60.00
2 NS 3S S = 600 24 80.00
3 NS 5T W+1 -620 26 86.67 µ Tbl = 75,56 %
a.9 Fabienne Smit -Thierry de Thibault 42,08 %
4 NS 1P E-2 200 30 100.00
5 NS 2P W = -110 3 10.00
6 NS 4C W-1 100 27 90.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.8 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 59,58 %
7 NS 1P N+4 200 19 63.33
8 NS 4C W+1 -450 7 23.33
9 NS 4C S-2 -100 8 26.67 µ Tbl = 37,78 %
a.6 Miguel del Marmol -Gaetan Collinet 55,42 %
16 NS 3T W = -110 3 10.00
17 NS 3T E-1 50 17 56.67
18 NS 4C S+1 650 2 6.67 µ Tbl = 24,44 %
a.5 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 48,19 %
19 NS 2C E+2 -170 13 43.33
20 NS 2P W = -110 11 36.67
21 NS 4P W+1 -450 11 36.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.4 Laurence del Marmol -Marie Christine Meeus 41,39 %
22 NS 3P S = 140 19 63.33
23 NS 6P E = -1430 7 23.33
24 NS 2K N = 90 20 66.67 µ Tbl = 51,11 %
a.3 Jeanine Bontemps -Aida Zumot 37,36 %
25 NS 5T N-1 -50 26 86.67
26 NS 1S W+2 -150 27 90.00
27 NS 4C W = -420 18 60.00 µ Tbl = 78,89 %
a.2 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 52,64 %
28 NS 1P W-1 50 5 16.67
29 NS 2T S+2 130 12 40.00
30 NS 6T W = -920 1 3.33 µ Tbl = 20,00 %
Total : 354,0 / 720 = 49,17 %
PAIRE B.8 Elena Valsesia -Nicole Blondeau
b.5 Caroll Pucher -Nicole Louette 51,25 %
1 NS 3S N-1 -50 5 16.67
2 NS 3S S-1 -100 10 33.33
3 NS 3S E-1 100 29 96.67 µ Tbl = 48,89 %
b.4 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 60,14 %
4 NS 1T N+2 110 21 70.00
5 NS 2P W-1 50 13 43.33
6 NS 4C W-1 100 27 90.00 µ Tbl = 67,78 %
b.2 Nicolas de Neve -Olivier Paternostre 51,67 %
7 NS 3P N+2 200 19 63.33
8 NS 4C W+1 -450 7 23.33
9 NS 4C S-1 -50 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
b.1 Helene Schyns -Antoinette Jourdain 51,11 %
10 NS 4C E-3 300 30 100.00
11 NS 1S E-1 50 20 66.67
12 NS 4C N+1 650 24 80.00 µ Tbl = 82,22 %
b10 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 51,67 %
13 NS 3S E-2 200 15 50.00
14 NS 4C W+1 -450 3 10.00
15 NS 4P E-2 100 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
b.8 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver 58,47 %
22 NS 4P S-1 -50 3 10.00
23 NS 4P E+2 -680 22 73.33
24 NS 3S S-1 -50 8 26.67 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
b.7 Anne Arsac -Sandra Dallemagne 51,53 %
25 NS 4P W+1 -650 1 3.33
26 NS 2S W+3 -210 11 36.67
27 NS 3S W+2 -460 7 23.33 µ Tbl = 21,11 %
b.6 Simone Munsterhjelm -Colette Heerinckx 48,06 %
28 NS 1K W-4 200 25 83.33
29 NS 3S N-1 -100 6 20.00
30 NS 3S E+1 -430 9 30.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 345,0 / 720 = 47,92 %
PAIRE A.4 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens
a.6 Miguel del Marmol -Gaetan Collinet 55,42 %
1 NS 4C N-1 -50 5 16.67
2 NS 4C S-2 -200 1 3.33
3 NS 4C E+2 -680 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 25,56 %
a.4 Laurence del Marmol -Marie Christine Meeus 41,39 %
10 NS 3C E = -140 10 33.33
11 NS 3C S-2 -100 6 20.00
12 NS 5C N = 650 24 80.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.3 Jeanine Bontemps -Aida Zumot 37,36 %
13 NS 3S W-1 100 7 23.33
14 NS 4T E = -130 20 66.67
15 NS 3C S = 140 25 83.33 µ Tbl = 57,78 %
a.2 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 52,64 %
16 NS 3C N = 140 19 63.33
17 NS 2T E-1 50 17 56.67
18 NS 4C S+2 680 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 58,89 %
a.1 Liliane Baptista -Jacques Podevyn 42,22 %
19 NS 3C E+1 -170 13 43.33
20 NS 3S W = -600 3 10.00
21 NS 6P W-3 150 30 100.00 µ Tbl = 51,11 %
a10 Andre Delacroix -Frédérique Pirlot 40,14 %
22 NS 2P S+1 140 19 63.33
23 NS 4P E+2 -680 22 73.33
24 NS 1S S+2 150 23 76.67 µ Tbl = 71,11 %
a.8 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 59,58 %
25 NS 3P W+1 -170 19 63.33
26 NS 3S W+2 -660 0 0.00
27 NS 4C E = -420 18 60.00 µ Tbl = 41,11 %
a.7 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 61,94 %
28 NS 1K W-3 150 17 56.67
29 NS 3S N-1 -100 6 20.00
30 NS 4CcN-3 -500 4 13.33 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
Total : 342,0 / 720 = 47,50 %
PAIRE A10 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst
a.9 Fabienne Smit -Thierry de Thibault 42,08 %
1 NS 2S S+1 150 28 93.33
2 NS 3S S-1 -100 10 33.33
3 NS 4C E+2 -680 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.8 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 59,58 %
4 NS 2S N-1 -100 2 6.67
5 NS 2P W-1 50 13 43.33
6 NS 2C W+2 -170 8 26.67 µ Tbl = 25,56 %
a.7 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 61,94 %
7 NS 2P N+2 170 6 20.00
8 NS 3C E+2 -200 24 80.00
9 NS 2C S = 110 22 73.33 µ Tbl = 57,78 %
a.6 Miguel del Marmol -Gaetan Collinet 55,42 %
10 NS 4C E = -620 1 3.33
11 NS 2P W = -110 1 3.33
12 NS 4P W-2 100 12 40.00 µ Tbl = 15,56 %
a.4 Laurence del Marmol -Marie Christine Meeus 41,39 %
13 NS 3S W = -600 2 6.67
14 NS 4C W = -420 8 26.67
15 NS 4P E-3 150 28 93.33 µ Tbl = 42,22 %
a.3 Jeanine Bontemps -Aida Zumot 37,36 %
16 NS 4C N-1 -50 10 33.33
17 NS 3T E-1 50 17 56.67
18 NS 4C N+2 680 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 48,89 %
a.2 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 52,64 %
19 NS 2C E = -110 24 80.00
20 NS 3S W-1 100 18 60.00
21 NS 4P W+1 -450 11 36.67 µ Tbl = 58,89 %
a10 Andre Delacroix -Frédérique Pirlot 40,14 %
28 NS 3S S-1 -100 2 6.67
29 NS 3S N = 600 21 70.00
30 NS 4T W+2 -170 28 93.33 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
Total : 330,0 / 720 = 45,83 %
PAIRE B.9 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren
b.7 Anne Arsac -Sandra Dallemagne 51,53 %
1 NS 2P E-4 200 30 100.00
2 NS 4C S-2 -200 1 3.33
3 NS 3S E+3 -690 4 13.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
b.6 Simone Munsterhjelm -Colette Heerinckx 48,06 %
4 NS 1T N+2 110 21 70.00
5 NS 2P W-1 50 13 43.33
6 NS 4C W-1 100 27 90.00 µ Tbl = 67,78 %
b.5 Caroll Pucher -Nicole Louette 51,25 %
7 NS 2P N+3 200 19 63.33
8 NS 6K E = -920 0 0.00
9 NS 4C S-2 -100 8 26.67 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
b.3 Serge Alard -Patrick Gilles 54,72 %
10 NS 4C E-1 100 20 66.67
11 NS 2C S-1 -50 12 40.00
12 NS 5C N = 650 24 80.00 µ Tbl = 62,22 %
b.2 Nicolas de Neve -Olivier Paternostre 51,67 %
13 NS 3S W-2 200 15 50.00
14 NS 4P N-3 -150 13 43.33
15 NS 3C S-1 -100 3 10.00 µ Tbl = 34,44 %
b.1 Helene Schyns -Antoinette Jourdain 51,11 %
16 NS 2C N+2 170 25 83.33
17 NS 3T E-1 50 17 56.67
18 NS 4C N+2 680 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 65,56 %
b.9 Veronique Englebienne -Marianne Borsu 40,42 %
25 NS 4P W = -620 9 30.00
26 NS 2S W+2 -180 20 66.67
27 NS 3S W+2 -460 7 23.33 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
b.8 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver 58,47 %
28 NS 2S N+1 150 17 56.67
29 NS 3S N-1 -100 6 20.00
30 NS 6T W = -920 1 3.33 µ Tbl = 26,67 %
Total : 329,0 / 720 = 45,69 %
PAIRE A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Grazia Neuenschwander
a.1 Liliane Baptista -Jacques Podevyn 42,22 %
1 NS 3K S-1 -50 5 16.67
2 NS 3S S = 600 24 80.00
3 NS 3S E+3 -690 4 13.33 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
a10 Andre Delacroix -Frédérique Pirlot 40,14 %
4 NS 1T N = 70 5 16.67
5 NS 2C S+1 140 19 63.33
6 NS 3C W = -140 19 63.33 µ Tbl = 47,78 %
a.9 Fabienne Smit -Thierry de Thibault 42,08 %
7 NS 2C S+1 140 0 0.00
8 NS 4C W = -420 16 53.33
9 NS 4C S-3 -150 3 10.00 µ Tbl = 21,11 %
a.8 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 59,58 %
10 NS 2C E+2 -170 5 16.67
11 NS 2P E-1 50 20 66.67
12 NS 3P W-1 50 8 26.67 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
a.7 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 61,94 %
13 NS 3S W = -600 2 6.67
14 NS 4C W+1 -450 3 10.00
15 NS 3P E-2 100 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 21,11 %
a.5 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 48,19 %
16 NS 4C S-2 -100 6 20.00
17 NS 3T E-1 50 17 56.67
18 NS 4C N+2 680 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.4 Laurence del Marmol -Marie Christine Meeus 41,39 %
19 NS 2C E+2 -170 13 43.33
20 NS 3S W-1 100 18 60.00
21 NS 3S W = -400 28 93.33 µ Tbl = 65,56 %
a.3 Jeanine Bontemps -Aida Zumot 37,36 %
22 NS 2P S+1 140 19 63.33
23 NS 4P E = -620 30 100.00
24 NS 4CcW-2 300 28 93.33 µ Tbl = 85,56 %
Total : 323,0 / 720 = 44,86 %
PAIRE A.8 Michele Berrier -Christiane Huby
a.5 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 48,19 %
1 NS 3P E-1 50 12 40.00
2 NS 3S S-1 -100 10 33.33
3 NS 4C E+2 -680 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
a.4 Laurence del Marmol -Marie Christine Meeus 41,39 %
4 NS 1T N+2 110 21 70.00
5 NS 3C N = 140 19 63.33
6 NS 2C W+2 -170 8 26.67 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
a.2 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 52,64 %
7 NS 3T E-2 200 19 63.33
8 NS 4C W+1 -450 7 23.33
9 NS 3C S = 140 24 80.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.1 Liliane Baptista -Jacques Podevyn 42,22 %
10 NS 2C E-1 100 20 66.67
11 NS 2P E = -110 1 3.33
12 NS 4C N+1 650 24 80.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a10 Andre Delacroix -Frédérique Pirlot 40,14 %
13 NS 3S W-3 300 25 83.33
14 NS 3P N-3 -150 13 43.33
15 NS 2C N+1 140 25 83.33 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
a.8 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 59,58 %
22 NS 3P S = 140 19 63.33
23 NS 6P W+1 -1460 1 3.33
24 NS 4K N-2 -100 1 3.33 µ Tbl = 23,33 %
a.7 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 61,94 %
25 NS 4P W = -620 9 30.00
26 NS 1S W+4 -210 11 36.67
27 NS 3S E+2 -460 7 23.33 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
a.6 Miguel del Marmol -Gaetan Collinet 55,42 %
28 NS 3T S = 110 8 26.67
29 NS 3S N-1 -100 6 20.00
30 NS 5K W+1 -420 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 323,0 / 720 = 44,86 %
PAIRE B10 Didier Collart -Gerard Cooreman
b.9 Veronique Englebienne -Marianne Borsu 40,42 %
1 NS 3P E-2 100 18 60.00
2 NS 3S S = 600 24 80.00
3 NS 3S W-1 100 29 96.67 µ Tbl = 78,89 %
b.8 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver 58,47 %
4 NS 1T N+1 90 12 40.00
5 NS 3C N-1 -100 8 26.67
6 NS 2C W+2 -170 8 26.67 µ Tbl = 31,11 %
b.7 Anne Arsac -Sandra Dallemagne 51,53 %
7 NS 1P N+3 170 6 20.00
8 NS 5C W-1 50 29 96.67
9 NS 2P S-5 -250 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
b.6 Simone Munsterhjelm -Colette Heerinckx 48,06 %
10 NS 2C E+2 -170 5 16.67
11 NS 3P E-2 100 27 90.00
12 NS 3P W-1 50 8 26.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
b.4 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 60,14 %
13 NS 3S W = -600 2 6.67
14 NS 4C W-1 50 29 96.67
15 NS 3P E-1 50 7 23.33 µ Tbl = 42,22 %
b.3 Serge Alard -Patrick Gilles 54,72 %
16 NS 2C N+1 140 19 63.33
17 NS 3S N-4 -200 0 0.00
18 NS 5C S+1 680 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
b.2 Nicolas de Neve -Olivier Paternostre 51,67 %
19 NS 4C E = -620 4 13.33
20 NS 3P W-1 100 18 60.00
21 NS 4P W+1 -450 11 36.67 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
b10 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 51,67 %
28 NS 3T N+1 130 10 33.33
29 NS 4P S-1 -100 6 20.00
30 NS 3S W+1 -430 9 30.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
Total : 306,0 / 720 = 42,50 %
PAIRE B.1 Brigitte Velge -Benedicte Lemaigre
b.1 Helene Schyns -Antoinette Jourdain 51,11 %
1 NS 2P E+1 -140 0 0.00
2 NS 3S S = 600 24 80.00
3 NS 4C E+2 -680 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 45,56 %
b10 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 51,67 %
4 NS 1T N+1 90 12 40.00
5 NS 2P W = -110 3 10.00
6 NS 2C W+1 -140 19 63.33 µ Tbl = 37,78 %
b.9 Veronique Englebienne -Marianne Borsu 40,42 %
7 NS 1P N+3 170 6 20.00
8 NS 4C W+1 -450 7 23.33
9 NS 4C S-1 -50 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 32,22 %
b.8 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver 58,47 %
10 NS 4C E-1 100 20 66.67
11 NS 2C S-1 -50 12 40.00
12 NS 3T S+2 150 15 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,22 %
b.7 Anne Arsac -Sandra Dallemagne 51,53 %
13 NS 3S W-2 200 15 50.00
14 NS 4C W+1 -450 3 10.00
15 NS 2C S = 110 21 70.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
b.5 Caroll Pucher -Nicole Louette 51,25 %
16 NS 4C N-1 -50 10 33.33
17 NS 2S S-3 -150 2 6.67
18 NS 4C N+2 680 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 32,22 %
b.4 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 60,14 %
19 NS 3C E+2 -200 6 20.00
20 NS 3S W-1 100 18 60.00
21 NS 4P W+1 -450 11 36.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
b.3 Serge Alard -Patrick Gilles 54,72 %
22 NS 2P S+1 140 19 63.33
23 NS 4P E+3 -710 13 43.33
24 NS 3S S-1 -50 8 26.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 294,0 / 720 = 40,83 %
PAIRE B.4 Claire Derieuw -Prisca Tondreau
b.6 Simone Munsterhjelm -Colette Heerinckx 48,06 %
1 NS 2S N = 120 22 73.33
2 NS 3S S-1 -100 10 33.33
3 NS 3S E+3 -690 4 13.33 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
b.4 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 60,14 %
10 NS 2C E+1 -140 10 33.33
11 NS 3S N-2 -100 6 20.00
12 NS 3S S-3 -300 1 3.33 µ Tbl = 18,89 %
b.3 Serge Alard -Patrick Gilles 54,72 %
13 NS 3S E-1 100 7 23.33
14 NS 4C W+1 -450 3 10.00
15 NS 3P E-1 50 7 23.33 µ Tbl = 18,89 %
b.2 Nicolas de Neve -Olivier Paternostre 51,67 %
16 NS 2P E-1 100 14 46.67
17 NS 3T E-1 50 17 56.67
18 NS 4C N+2 680 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
b.1 Helene Schyns -Antoinette Jourdain 51,11 %
19 NS 2C E+1 -140 21 70.00
20 NS 3S W = -600 3 10.00
21 NS 4P W+2 -480 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 26,67 %
b10 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 51,67 %
22 NS 2P S+1 140 19 63.33
23 NS 6P E = -1430 7 23.33
24 NS 1C W-1 50 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
b.8 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver 58,47 %
25 NS 3P W+1 -170 19 63.33
26 NS 2C S-2 -200 16 53.33
27 NS 4C E = -420 18 60.00 µ Tbl = 58,89 %
b.7 Anne Arsac -Sandra Dallemagne 51,53 %
28 NS 1S N+2 150 17 56.67
29 NS 3S N-2 -200 0 0.00
30 NS 3T W+3 -170 28 93.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 282,0 / 720 = 39,17 %
PAIRE B.6 Brigitte Brusselmans -Michel Léonard
b10 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 51,67 %
1 NS 3P E-1 50 12 40.00
2 NS 3S N = 600 24 80.00
3 NS 4C E+2 -680 17 56.67 µ Tbl = 58,89 %
b.9 Veronique Englebienne -Marianne Borsu 40,42 %
4 NS 2S N-2 -200 0 0.00
5 NS 2P W-1 50 13 43.33
6 NS 3C E = -140 19 63.33 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
b.8 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver 58,47 %
7 NS 3P N+1 170 6 20.00
8 NS 4C E+1 -450 7 23.33
9 NS 3C S-1 -50 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 32,22 %
b.6 Simone Munsterhjelm -Colette Heerinckx 48,06 %
16 NS 1C N+2 140 19 63.33
17 NS 1S S-2 -100 5 16.67
18 NS 3C S+1 170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 26,67 %
b.5 Caroll Pucher -Nicole Louette 51,25 %
19 NS 3C E+1 -170 13 43.33
20 NS 5K E-2 200 27 90.00
21 NS 4P W+1 -450 11 36.67 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
b.4 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 60,14 %
22 NS 4P S-1 -50 3 10.00
23 NS 6P E = -1430 7 23.33
24 NS 4T S-2 -100 1 3.33 µ Tbl = 12,22 %
b.3 Serge Alard -Patrick Gilles 54,72 %
25 NS 4P W+1 -650 1 3.33
26 NS 1S W+3 -180 20 66.67
27 NS 3S E+3 -490 1 3.33 µ Tbl = 24,44 %
b.2 Nicolas de Neve -Olivier Paternostre 51,67 %
28 NS 3P W-4 200 25 83.33
29 NS 2P S+1 140 14 46.67
30 NS 5T E+1 -420 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 277,0 / 720 = 38,47 %
PAIRE a.7 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels
A.9 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 52,92 %
1 EO 3C N = 140 4 13.33
2 EO 3S S-1 -100 20 66.67
3 EO 4C E+2 -680 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 41,11 %
A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Francoise Turin 51,11 %
4 EO 1T N+1 90 18 60.00
5 EO 2S S+1 150 6 20.00
6 EO 3C W+1 -170 22 73.33 µ Tbl = 51,11 %
A10 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 45,83 %
7 EO 2P N+2 170 24 80.00
8 EO 3C E+2 -200 6 20.00
9 EO 2C S = 110 8 26.67 µ Tbl = 42,22 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Grazia Neuenschwander 44,86 %
13 EO 3S W = -600 28 93.33
14 EO 4C W+1 -450 27 90.00
15 EO 3P E-2 100 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 78,89 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Noelle Fosse 63,75 %
19 EO 3S E+2 -660 28 93.33
20 EO 2P W = -110 19 63.33
21 EO 4P W+1 -450 19 63.33 µ Tbl = 73,33 %
A.3 Gaetan van de Werve -Hugo Baetens 59,86 %
22 EO 2P S+1 140 11 36.67
23 EO 6P E+1 -1460 29 96.67
24 EO 3P S-1 -50 22 73.33 µ Tbl = 68,89 %
A.8 Michele Berrier -Christiane Huby 44,86 %
25 EO 4P W = -620 21 70.00
26 EO 1S W+4 -210 19 63.33
27 EO 3S E+2 -460 23 76.67 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
A.4 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 47,50 %
28 EO 1K W-3 150 13 43.33
29 EO 3S N-1 -100 24 80.00
30 EO 4CcN-3 -500 26 86.67 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
Total : 446,0 / 720 = 61,94 %
PAIRE b.4 Catherine de Moffarts -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
B.8 Elena Valsesia -Nicole Blondeau 47,92 %
4 EO 1T N+2 110 9 30.00
5 EO 2P W-1 50 17 56.67
6 EO 4C W-1 100 3 10.00 µ Tbl = 32,22 %
B.4 Claire Derieuw -Prisca Tondreau 39,17 %
10 EO 2C E+1 -140 20 66.67
11 EO 3S N-2 -100 24 80.00
12 EO 3S S-3 -300 29 96.67 µ Tbl = 81,11 %
B10 Didier Collart -Gerard Cooreman 42,50 %
13 EO 3S W = -600 28 93.33
14 EO 4C W-1 50 1 3.33
15 EO 3P E-1 50 23 76.67 µ Tbl = 57,78 %
B.5 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 55,56 %
16 EO 4C N = 420 1 3.33
17 EO 3T E-1 50 13 43.33
18 EO 5C S+1 680 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
B.1 Brigitte Velge -Benedicte Lemaigre 40,83 %
19 EO 3C E+2 -200 24 80.00
20 EO 3S W-1 100 12 40.00
21 EO 4P W+1 -450 19 63.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
B.6 Brigitte Brusselmans -Michel Léonard 38,47 %
22 EO 4P S-1 -50 27 90.00
23 EO 6P E = -1430 23 76.67
24 EO 4T S-2 -100 29 96.67 µ Tbl = 87,78 %
B.2 Marguerite Verstraeten -Germaine Anciaux 49,72 %
25 EO 4P W = -620 21 70.00
26 EO 3S W+1 -630 28 93.33
27 EO 3S E+3 -490 29 96.67 µ Tbl = 86,67 %
B.7 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 53,89 %
28 EO 1P W-1 50 25 83.33
29 EO 3S N+1 630 1 3.33
30 EO 5T W+1 -420 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 433,0 / 720 = 60,14 %
PAIRE a.8 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige
A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Francoise Turin 51,11 %
1 EO 3K S-1 -50 25 83.33
2 EO 3S S-1 -100 20 66.67
3 EO 3S E+3 -690 26 86.67 µ Tbl = 78,89 %
A10 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 45,83 %
4 EO 2S N-1 -100 28 93.33
5 EO 2P W-1 50 17 56.67
6 EO 2C W+2 -170 22 73.33 µ Tbl = 74,44 %
A.6 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy 49,17 %
7 EO 1P N+4 200 11 36.67
8 EO 4C W+1 -450 23 76.67
9 EO 4C S-2 -100 22 73.33 µ Tbl = 62,22 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Grazia Neuenschwander 44,86 %
10 EO 2C E+2 -170 25 83.33
11 EO 2P E-1 50 10 33.33
12 EO 3P W-1 50 22 73.33 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Martine Zens 59,17 %
16 EO 3C S+1 170 5 16.67
17 EO 3C W-3 150 0 0.00
18 EO 4C N+2 680 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 20,00 %
A.8 Michele Berrier -Christiane Huby 44,86 %
22 EO 3P S = 140 11 36.67
23 EO 6P W+1 -1460 29 96.67
24 EO 4K N-2 -100 29 96.67 µ Tbl = 76,67 %
A.4 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 47,50 %
25 EO 3P W+1 -170 11 36.67
26 EO 3S W+2 -660 30 100.00
27 EO 4C E = -420 12 40.00 µ Tbl = 58,89 %
A.9 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 52,92 %
28 EO 3S S-5 -500 30 100.00
29 EO 3S N+1 630 1 3.33
30 EO 3S E = -400 7 23.33 µ Tbl = 42,22 %
Total : 429,0 / 720 = 59,58 %
PAIRE b.8 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver
B.5 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 55,56 %
1 EO 2K S+2 130 6 20.00
2 EO 3S S-1 -100 20 66.67
3 EO 4C E+2 -680 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
B10 Didier Collart -Gerard Cooreman 42,50 %
4 EO 1T N+1 90 18 60.00
5 EO 3C N-1 -100 22 73.33
6 EO 2C W+2 -170 22 73.33 µ Tbl = 68,89 %
B.6 Brigitte Brusselmans -Michel Léonard 38,47 %
7 EO 3P N+1 170 24 80.00
8 EO 4C E+1 -450 23 76.67
9 EO 3C S-1 -50 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 67,78 %
B.1 Brigitte Velge -Benedicte Lemaigre 40,83 %
10 EO 4C E-1 100 10 33.33
11 EO 2C S-1 -50 18 60.00
12 EO 3T S+2 150 15 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,78 %
B.2 Marguerite Verstraeten -Germaine Anciaux 49,72 %
16 EO 4C N-3 -150 30 100.00
17 EO 3T E-1 50 13 43.33
18 EO 5C S+1 680 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 62,22 %
B.8 Elena Valsesia -Nicole Blondeau 47,92 %
22 EO 4P S-1 -50 27 90.00
23 EO 4P E+2 -680 8 26.67
24 EO 3S S-1 -50 22 73.33 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
B.4 Claire Derieuw -Prisca Tondreau 39,17 %
25 EO 3P W+1 -170 11 36.67
26 EO 2C S-2 -200 14 46.67
27 EO 4C E = -420 12 40.00 µ Tbl = 41,11 %
B.9 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren 45,69 %
28 EO 2S N+1 150 13 43.33
29 EO 3S N-1 -100 24 80.00
30 EO 6T W = -920 29 96.67 µ Tbl = 73,33 %
Total : 421,0 / 720 = 58,47 %
PAIRE a.6 Miguel del Marmol -Gaetan Collinet
A.4 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 47,50 %
1 EO 4C N-1 -50 25 83.33
2 EO 4C S-2 -200 29 96.67
3 EO 4C E+2 -680 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 74,44 %
A.9 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 52,92 %
4 EO 1T N = 70 25 83.33
5 EO 4C N = 620 0 0.00
6 EO 3C W = -140 11 36.67 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A10 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 45,83 %
10 EO 4C E = -620 29 96.67
11 EO 2P W = -110 29 96.67
12 EO 4P W-2 100 18 60.00 µ Tbl = 84,44 %
A.6 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy 49,17 %
16 EO 3T W = -110 27 90.00
17 EO 3T E-1 50 13 43.33
18 EO 4C S+1 650 28 93.33 µ Tbl = 75,56 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Martine Zens 59,17 %
19 EO 4C E+2 -680 30 100.00
20 EO 3P W = -140 22 73.33
21 EO 3S W+1 -430 8 26.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Noelle Fosse 63,75 %
22 EO 3S S = 400 0 0.00
23 EO 4P E+2 -680 8 26.67
24 EO 4CcW-2 300 2 6.67 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
A.3 Gaetan van de Werve -Hugo Baetens 59,86 %
25 EO 5T N-1 -50 4 13.33
26 EO 2S E-1 100 0 0.00
27 EO 3S E+1 -430 18 60.00 µ Tbl = 24,44 %
A.8 Michele Berrier -Christiane Huby 44,86 %
28 EO 3T S = 110 22 73.33
29 EO 3S N-1 -100 24 80.00
30 EO 5K W+1 -420 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 399,0 / 720 = 55,42 %
PAIRE b.3 Serge Alard -Patrick Gilles
B.7 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 53,89 %
1 EO 2P E-1 50 18 60.00
2 EO 3S S = 600 6 20.00
3 EO 4C E+2 -680 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 41,11 %
B.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Giuseppe Napoli 67,22 %
7 EO 4PcN = 790 0 0.00
8 EO 4C W = -420 14 46.67
9 EO 4C N = 420 1 3.33 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
B.9 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren 45,69 %
10 EO 4C E-1 100 10 33.33
11 EO 2C S-1 -50 18 60.00
12 EO 5C N = 650 6 20.00 µ Tbl = 37,78 %
B.4 Claire Derieuw -Prisca Tondreau 39,17 %
13 EO 3S E-1 100 23 76.67
14 EO 4C W+1 -450 27 90.00
15 EO 3P E-1 50 23 76.67 µ Tbl = 81,11 %
B10 Didier Collart -Gerard Cooreman 42,50 %
16 EO 2C N+1 140 11 36.67
17 EO 3S N-4 -200 30 100.00
18 EO 5C S+1 680 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
B.5 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 55,56 %
19 EO 3C E+1 -170 17 56.67
20 EO 3S W = -600 27 90.00
21 EO 4P W+1 -450 19 63.33 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
B.1 Brigitte Velge -Benedicte Lemaigre 40,83 %
22 EO 2P S+1 140 11 36.67
23 EO 4P E+3 -710 17 56.67
24 EO 3S S-1 -50 22 73.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
B.6 Brigitte Brusselmans -Michel Léonard 38,47 %
25 EO 4P W+1 -650 29 96.67
26 EO 1S W+3 -180 10 33.33
27 EO 3S E+3 -490 29 96.67 µ Tbl = 75,56 %
Total : 394,0 / 720 = 54,72 %
PAIRE a.2 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Martine Zens 59,17 %
4 EO 2S S = 120 4 13.33
5 EO 2P W = -110 27 90.00
6 EO 2C W+2 -170 22 73.33 µ Tbl = 58,89 %
A.8 Michele Berrier -Christiane Huby 44,86 %
7 EO 3T E-2 200 11 36.67
8 EO 4C W+1 -450 23 76.67
9 EO 3C S = 140 6 20.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.3 Gaetan van de Werve -Hugo Baetens 59,86 %
10 EO 4C E-1 100 10 33.33
11 EO 3C S-2 -100 24 80.00
12 EO 6C N-1 -100 26 86.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.9 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 52,92 %
13 EO 3S W-4 400 0 0.00
14 EO 3P N-2 -100 7 23.33
15 EO 3P E-2 100 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 25,56 %
A.4 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 47,50 %
16 EO 3C N = 140 11 36.67
17 EO 2T E-1 50 13 43.33
18 EO 4C S+2 680 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 41,11 %
A10 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 45,83 %
19 EO 2C E = -110 6 20.00
20 EO 3S W-1 100 12 40.00
21 EO 4P W+1 -450 19 63.33 µ Tbl = 41,11 %
A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Francoise Turin 51,11 %
22 EO 4P S-1 -50 27 90.00
23 EO 4P E+2 -680 8 26.67
24 EO 3S S-1 -50 22 73.33 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
A.6 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy 49,17 %
28 EO 1P W-1 50 25 83.33
29 EO 2T S+2 130 18 60.00
30 EO 6T W = -920 29 96.67 µ Tbl = 80,00 %
Total : 379,0 / 720 = 52,64 %
PAIRE b.2 Nicolas de Neve -Olivier Paternostre
B.2 Marguerite Verstraeten -Germaine Anciaux 49,72 %
4 EO 1T N+1 90 18 60.00
5 EO 2S S+1 150 6 20.00
6 EO 2C W+2 -170 22 73.33 µ Tbl = 51,11 %
B.8 Elena Valsesia -Nicole Blondeau 47,92 %
7 EO 3P N+2 200 11 36.67
8 EO 4C W+1 -450 23 76.67
9 EO 4C S-1 -50 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
B.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Giuseppe Napoli 67,22 %
10 EO 2C E-1 100 10 33.33
11 EO 2C S-1 -50 18 60.00
12 EO 5C N = 650 6 20.00 µ Tbl = 37,78 %
B.9 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren 45,69 %
13 EO 3S W-2 200 15 50.00
14 EO 4P N-3 -150 17 56.67
15 EO 3C S-1 -100 27 90.00 µ Tbl = 65,56 %
B.4 Claire Derieuw -Prisca Tondreau 39,17 %
16 EO 2P E-1 100 16 53.33
17 EO 3T E-1 50 13 43.33
18 EO 4C N+2 680 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
B10 Didier Collart -Gerard Cooreman 42,50 %
19 EO 4C E = -620 26 86.67
20 EO 3P W-1 100 12 40.00
21 EO 4P W+1 -450 19 63.33 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
B.5 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 55,56 %
22 EO 4P S-1 -50 27 90.00
23 EO 4P E+3 -710 17 56.67
24 EO 1S S+2 150 7 23.33 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
B.6 Brigitte Brusselmans -Michel Léonard 38,47 %
28 EO 3P W-4 200 5 16.67
29 EO 2P S+1 140 16 53.33
30 EO 5T E+1 -420 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 372,0 / 720 = 51,67 %
PAIRE b10 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger
B.6 Brigitte Brusselmans -Michel Léonard 38,47 %
1 EO 3P E-1 50 18 60.00
2 EO 3S N = 600 6 20.00
3 EO 4C E+2 -680 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 41,11 %
B.1 Brigitte Velge -Benedicte Lemaigre 40,83 %
4 EO 1T N+1 90 18 60.00
5 EO 2P W = -110 27 90.00
6 EO 2C W+1 -140 11 36.67 µ Tbl = 62,22 %
B.7 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 53,89 %
7 EO 3P N+2 200 11 36.67
8 EO 4C W = -420 14 46.67
9 EO 4C S-1 -50 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
B.2 Marguerite Verstraeten -Germaine Anciaux 49,72 %
10 EO 4C E-1 100 10 33.33
11 EO 2P E-1 50 10 33.33
12 EO 3P W-1 50 22 73.33 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
B.8 Elena Valsesia -Nicole Blondeau 47,92 %
13 EO 3S E-2 200 15 50.00
14 EO 4C W+1 -450 27 90.00
15 EO 4P E-2 100 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
B.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Giuseppe Napoli 67,22 %
16 EO 2C N+1 140 11 36.67
17 EO 2P S = 110 3 10.00
18 EO 4C N+2 680 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
B.4 Claire Derieuw -Prisca Tondreau 39,17 %
22 EO 2P S+1 140 11 36.67
23 EO 6P E = -1430 23 76.67
24 EO 1C W-1 50 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
B10 Didier Collart -Gerard Cooreman 42,50 %
28 EO 3T N+1 130 20 66.67
29 EO 4P S-1 -100 24 80.00
30 EO 3S W+1 -430 21 70.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
Total : 372,0 / 720 = 51,67 %
PAIRE b.7 Anne Arsac -Sandra Dallemagne
B.9 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren 45,69 %
1 EO 2P E-4 200 0 0.00
2 EO 4C S-2 -200 29 96.67
3 EO 3S E+3 -690 26 86.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
B.5 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 55,56 %
4 EO 2S N+1 150 2 6.67
5 EO 2S S+1 150 6 20.00
6 EO 4C W = -620 30 100.00 µ Tbl = 42,22 %
B10 Didier Collart -Gerard Cooreman 42,50 %
7 EO 1P N+3 170 24 80.00
8 EO 5C W-1 50 1 3.33
9 EO 2P S-5 -250 30 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
B.1 Brigitte Velge -Benedicte Lemaigre 40,83 %
13 EO 3S W-2 200 15 50.00
14 EO 4C W+1 -450 27 90.00
15 EO 2C S = 110 9 30.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
B.7 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 53,89 %
19 EO 2P S = 110 2 6.67
20 EO 4P W-2 200 3 10.00
21 EO 4P W+1 -450 19 63.33 µ Tbl = 26,67 %
B.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Giuseppe Napoli 67,22 %
22 EO 2P S = 110 22 73.33
23 EO 4P E+2 -680 8 26.67
24 EO 4CcW-2 300 2 6.67 µ Tbl = 35,56 %
B.8 Elena Valsesia -Nicole Blondeau 47,92 %
25 EO 4P W+1 -650 29 96.67
26 EO 2S W+3 -210 19 63.33
27 EO 3S W+2 -460 23 76.67 µ Tbl = 78,89 %
B.4 Claire Derieuw -Prisca Tondreau 39,17 %
28 EO 1S N+2 150 13 43.33
29 EO 3S N-2 -200 30 100.00
30 EO 3T W+3 -170 2 6.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 371,0 / 720 = 51,53 %
PAIRE b.5 Caroll Pucher -Nicole Louette
B.8 Elena Valsesia -Nicole Blondeau 47,92 %
1 EO 3S N-1 -50 25 83.33
2 EO 3S S-1 -100 20 66.67
3 EO 3S E-1 100 1 3.33 µ Tbl = 51,11 %
B.9 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren 45,69 %
7 EO 2P N+3 200 11 36.67
8 EO 6K E = -920 30 100.00
9 EO 4C S-2 -100 22 73.33 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
B.5 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 55,56 %
13 EO 3S E-2 200 15 50.00
14 EO 4C W-1 50 1 3.33
15 EO 2C S-1 -100 27 90.00 µ Tbl = 47,78 %
B.1 Brigitte Velge -Benedicte Lemaigre 40,83 %
16 EO 4C N-1 -50 20 66.67
17 EO 2S S-3 -150 28 93.33
18 EO 4C N+2 680 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 67,78 %
B.6 Brigitte Brusselmans -Michel Léonard 38,47 %
19 EO 3C E+1 -170 17 56.67
20 EO 5K E-2 200 3 10.00
21 EO 4P W+1 -450 19 63.33 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
B.2 Marguerite Verstraeten -Germaine Anciaux 49,72 %
22 EO 2P S+1 140 11 36.67
23 EO 6P E = -1430 23 76.67
24 EO 3C W-1 50 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
B.7 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 53,89 %
25 EO 4P W = -620 21 70.00
26 EO 1S W+4 -210 19 63.33
27 EO 6C W-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
B.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Giuseppe Napoli 67,22 %
28 EO 2P W-3 150 13 43.33
29 EO 3S N = 600 9 30.00
30 EO 3S W = -400 7 23.33 µ Tbl = 32,22 %
Total : 369,0 / 720 = 51,25 %
PAIRE b.1 Helene Schyns -Antoinette Jourdain
B.1 Brigitte Velge -Benedicte Lemaigre 40,83 %
1 EO 2P E+1 -140 30 100.00
2 EO 3S S = 600 6 20.00
3 EO 4C E+2 -680 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 54,44 %
B.7 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 53,89 %
4 EO 1T N+1 90 18 60.00
5 EO 2P W = -110 27 90.00
6 EO 3C W+1 -170 22 73.33 µ Tbl = 74,44 %
B.2 Marguerite Verstraeten -Germaine Anciaux 49,72 %
7 EO 3C S+2 200 11 36.67
8 EO 3K E+1 -130 4 13.33
9 EO 4C S-3 -150 27 90.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
B.8 Elena Valsesia -Nicole Blondeau 47,92 %
10 EO 4C E-3 300 0 0.00
11 EO 1S E-1 50 10 33.33
12 EO 4C N+1 650 6 20.00 µ Tbl = 17,78 %
B.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Giuseppe Napoli 67,22 %
13 EO 3S W-2 200 15 50.00
14 EO 3P N-3 -150 17 56.67
15 EO 2P E+1 -140 30 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,89 %
B.9 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren 45,69 %
16 EO 2C N+2 170 5 16.67
17 EO 3T E-1 50 13 43.33
18 EO 4C N+2 680 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 34,44 %
B.4 Claire Derieuw -Prisca Tondreau 39,17 %
19 EO 2C E+1 -140 9 30.00
20 EO 3S W = -600 27 90.00
21 EO 4P W+2 -480 30 100.00 µ Tbl = 73,33 %
B.5 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 55,56 %
25 EO 3P W+1 -170 11 36.67
26 EO 1S W+4 -210 19 63.33
27 EO 3S E = -400 5 16.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 368,0 / 720 = 51,11 %
PAIRE a.5 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
A.8 Michele Berrier -Christiane Huby 44,86 %
1 EO 3P E-1 50 18 60.00
2 EO 3S S-1 -100 20 66.67
3 EO 4C E+2 -680 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
A.9 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 52,92 %
7 EO 2P N+3 200 11 36.67
8 EO 4C W+1 -450 23 76.67
9 EO 4C S-2 -100 22 73.33 µ Tbl = 62,22 %
A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Francoise Turin 51,11 %
13 EO 3S W-2 200 15 50.00
14 EO 3P N-2 -100 7 23.33
15 EO 4P E-2 100 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 42,22 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Grazia Neuenschwander 44,86 %
16 EO 4C S-2 -100 24 80.00
17 EO 3T E-1 50 13 43.33
18 EO 4C N+2 680 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.6 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy 49,17 %
19 EO 2C E+2 -170 17 56.67
20 EO 2P W = -110 19 63.33
21 EO 4P W+1 -450 19 63.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Martine Zens 59,17 %
22 EO 2P S+1 140 11 36.67
23 EO 4P E+2 -680 8 26.67
24 EO 2C W-1 50 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Noelle Fosse 63,75 %
25 EO 3C S-1 -50 4 13.33
26 EO 3S W = -600 25 83.33
27 EO 5S W = -460 23 76.67 µ Tbl = 57,78 %
A.3 Gaetan van de Werve -Hugo Baetens 59,86 %
28 EO 3S N = 600 1 3.33
29 EO 3S N = 600 9 30.00
30 EO 3T W+3 -170 2 6.67 µ Tbl = 13,33 %
Total : 347,0 / 720 = 48,19 %
PAIRE b.6 Simone Munsterhjelm -Colette Heerinckx
B.4 Claire Derieuw -Prisca Tondreau 39,17 %
1 EO 2S N = 120 8 26.67
2 EO 3S S-1 -100 20 66.67
3 EO 3S E+3 -690 26 86.67 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
B.9 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren 45,69 %
4 EO 1T N+2 110 9 30.00
5 EO 2P W-1 50 17 56.67
6 EO 4C W-1 100 3 10.00 µ Tbl = 32,22 %
B10 Didier Collart -Gerard Cooreman 42,50 %
10 EO 2C E+2 -170 25 83.33
11 EO 3P E-2 100 3 10.00
12 EO 3P W-1 50 22 73.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
B.6 Brigitte Brusselmans -Michel Léonard 38,47 %
16 EO 1C N+2 140 11 36.67
17 EO 1S S-2 -100 25 83.33
18 EO 3C S+1 170 30 100.00 µ Tbl = 73,33 %
B.2 Marguerite Verstraeten -Germaine Anciaux 49,72 %
19 EO 2C E+1 -140 9 30.00
20 EO 3S W = -600 27 90.00
21 EO 4P W = -420 5 16.67 µ Tbl = 45,56 %
B.7 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 53,89 %
22 EO 2P S+1 140 11 36.67
23 EO 4P E+2 -680 8 26.67
24 EO 3S S-1 -50 22 73.33 µ Tbl = 45,56 %
B.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Giuseppe Napoli 67,22 %
25 EO 4P W-1 100 0 0.00
26 EO 2S W+1 -150 3 10.00
27 EO 4C W = -420 12 40.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
B.8 Elena Valsesia -Nicole Blondeau 47,92 %
28 EO 1K W-4 200 5 16.67
29 EO 3S N-1 -100 24 80.00
30 EO 3S E+1 -430 21 70.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 346,0 / 720 = 48,06 %
PAIRE a.1 Liliane Baptista -Jacques Podevyn
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Grazia Neuenschwander 44,86 %
1 EO 3K S-1 -50 25 83.33
2 EO 3S S = 600 6 20.00
3 EO 3S E+3 -690 26 86.67 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Noelle Fosse 63,75 %
4 EO 1T N+2 110 9 30.00
5 EO 3S S = 600 2 6.67
6 EO 4C W-1 100 3 10.00 µ Tbl = 15,56 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Martine Zens 59,17 %
7 EO 2P N+2 170 24 80.00
8 EO 4K E-1 50 1 3.33
9 EO 3C S+1 170 4 13.33 µ Tbl = 32,22 %
A.8 Michele Berrier -Christiane Huby 44,86 %
10 EO 2C E-1 100 10 33.33
11 EO 2P E = -110 29 96.67
12 EO 4C N+1 650 6 20.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.3 Gaetan van de Werve -Hugo Baetens 59,86 %
13 EO 3S W-3 300 5 16.67
14 EO 3P N-3 -150 17 56.67
15 EO 2C S = 110 9 30.00 µ Tbl = 34,44 %
A.9 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 52,92 %
16 EO 4C N-1 -50 20 66.67
17 EO 2T E = -90 22 73.33
18 EO 4C N+2 680 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.4 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 47,50 %
19 EO 3C E+1 -170 17 56.67
20 EO 3S W = -600 27 90.00
21 EO 6P W-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 48,89 %
A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Francoise Turin 51,11 %
25 EO 4P W = -620 21 70.00
26 EO 2P E+2 -170 6 20.00
27 EO 2C W+1 -140 2 6.67 µ Tbl = 32,22 %
Total : 304,0 / 720 = 42,22 %
PAIRE a.9 Fabienne Smit -Thierry de Thibault
A10 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 45,83 %
1 EO 2S S+1 150 2 6.67
2 EO 3S S-1 -100 20 66.67
3 EO 4C E+2 -680 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.6 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy 49,17 %
4 EO 1P E-2 200 0 0.00
5 EO 2P W = -110 27 90.00
6 EO 4C W-1 100 3 10.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Grazia Neuenschwander 44,86 %
7 EO 2C S+1 140 30 100.00
8 EO 4C W = -420 14 46.67
9 EO 4C S-3 -150 27 90.00 µ Tbl = 78,89 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Noelle Fosse 63,75 %
10 EO 4C E-2 200 2 6.67
11 EO 3P E-1 50 10 33.33
12 EO 4C N+1 650 6 20.00 µ Tbl = 20,00 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Martine Zens 59,17 %
13 EO 3S W-3 300 5 16.67
14 EO 3C W = -140 12 40.00
15 EO 3P E-2 100 16 53.33 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
A.3 Gaetan van de Werve -Hugo Baetens 59,86 %
19 EO 4P S-1 -50 4 13.33
20 EO 4P W-2 200 3 10.00
21 EO 4P W = -420 5 16.67 µ Tbl = 13,33 %
A.9 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 52,92 %
25 EO 4P W = -620 21 70.00
26 EO 3S W = -600 25 83.33
27 EO 4C W = -420 12 40.00 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Francoise Turin 51,11 %
28 EO 1K W-3 150 13 43.33
29 EO 3S N = 600 9 30.00
30 EO 3S W+3 -490 24 80.00 µ Tbl = 51,11 %
Total : 303,0 / 720 = 42,08 %
PAIRE a.4 Laurence del Marmol -Marie Christine Meeus
A.8 Michele Berrier -Christiane Huby 44,86 %
4 EO 1T N+2 110 9 30.00
5 EO 3C N = 140 11 36.67
6 EO 2C W+2 -170 22 73.33 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
A.4 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 47,50 %
10 EO 3C E = -140 20 66.67
11 EO 3C S-2 -100 24 80.00
12 EO 5C N = 650 6 20.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A10 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 45,83 %
13 EO 3S W = -600 28 93.33
14 EO 4C W = -420 22 73.33
15 EO 4P E-3 150 2 6.67 µ Tbl = 57,78 %
A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Francoise Turin 51,11 %
16 EO 4C N = 420 1 3.33
17 EO 2P S = 110 3 10.00
18 EO 4C S+2 680 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 18,89 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Grazia Neuenschwander 44,86 %
19 EO 2C E+2 -170 17 56.67
20 EO 3S W-1 100 12 40.00
21 EO 3S W = -400 2 6.67 µ Tbl = 34,44 %
A.6 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy 49,17 %
22 EO 3P S = 140 11 36.67
23 EO 6P E = -1430 23 76.67
24 EO 2K N = 90 10 33.33 µ Tbl = 48,89 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Martine Zens 59,17 %
25 EO 3P W+1 -170 11 36.67
26 EO 1S W+3 -180 10 33.33
27 EO 3S E = -400 5 16.67 µ Tbl = 28,89 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Noelle Fosse 63,75 %
28 EO 1S S+2 150 13 43.33
29 EO 3S N = 600 9 30.00
30 EO 5T W+1 -420 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
Total : 298,0 / 720 = 41,39 %
PAIRE b.9 Veronique Englebienne -Marianne Borsu
B10 Didier Collart -Gerard Cooreman 42,50 %
1 EO 3P E-2 100 12 40.00
2 EO 3S S = 600 6 20.00
3 EO 3S W-1 100 1 3.33 µ Tbl = 21,11 %
B.6 Brigitte Brusselmans -Michel Léonard 38,47 %
4 EO 2S N-2 -200 30 100.00
5 EO 2P W-1 50 17 56.67
6 EO 3C E = -140 11 36.67 µ Tbl = 64,44 %
B.1 Brigitte Velge -Benedicte Lemaigre 40,83 %
7 EO 1P N+3 170 24 80.00
8 EO 4C W+1 -450 23 76.67
9 EO 4C S-1 -50 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 67,78 %
B.7 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 53,89 %
10 EO 4C E = -620 29 96.67
11 EO 2P E-3 150 0 0.00
12 EO 4P W-3 150 15 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,89 %
B.2 Marguerite Verstraeten -Germaine Anciaux 49,72 %
13 EO 3S W-3 300 5 16.67
14 EO 4P N-1 -50 4 13.33
15 EO 3S W-4 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 10,00 %
B.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Giuseppe Napoli 67,22 %
19 EO 4C W-3 300 0 0.00
20 EO 4KcE-1 200 3 10.00
21 EO 4P W+1 -450 19 63.33 µ Tbl = 24,44 %
B.9 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren 45,69 %
25 EO 4P W = -620 21 70.00
26 EO 2S W+2 -180 10 33.33
27 EO 3S W+2 -460 23 76.67 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
B.5 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 55,56 %
28 EO 3S S = 600 1 3.33
29 EO 3S N = 600 9 30.00
30 EO 5T W+1 -420 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 26,67 %
Total : 291,0 / 720 = 40,42 %
PAIRE a10 Andre Delacroix -Frédérique Pirlot
A.6 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy 49,17 %
1 EO 3P E-2 100 12 40.00
2 EO 3S S = 600 6 20.00
3 EO 5T W+1 -620 4 13.33 µ Tbl = 24,44 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Grazia Neuenschwander 44,86 %
4 EO 1T N = 70 25 83.33
5 EO 2C S+1 140 11 36.67
6 EO 3C W = -140 11 36.67 µ Tbl = 52,22 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Noelle Fosse 63,75 %
7 EO 2P N+3 200 11 36.67
8 EO 4PcS-2 -300 9 30.00
9 EO 4C N = 420 1 3.33 µ Tbl = 23,33 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Martine Zens 59,17 %
10 EO 2C E-1 100 10 33.33
11 EO 1S E-2 100 3 10.00
12 EO 3S S-3 -300 29 96.67 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
A.8 Michele Berrier -Christiane Huby 44,86 %
13 EO 3S W-3 300 5 16.67
14 EO 3P N-3 -150 17 56.67
15 EO 2C N+1 140 5 16.67 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
A.3 Gaetan van de Werve -Hugo Baetens 59,86 %
16 EO 2P E = -110 27 90.00
17 EO 3K N-2 -100 25 83.33
18 EO 5C S+1 680 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
A.4 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 47,50 %
22 EO 2P S+1 140 11 36.67
23 EO 4P E+2 -680 8 26.67
24 EO 1S S+2 150 7 23.33 µ Tbl = 28,89 %
A10 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 45,83 %
28 EO 3S S-1 -100 28 93.33
29 EO 3S N = 600 9 30.00
30 EO 4T W+2 -170 2 6.67 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
Total : 289,0 / 720 = 40,14 %
PAIRE a.3 Jeanine Bontemps -Aida Zumot
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Noelle Fosse 63,75 %
1 EO 3P E-2 100 12 40.00
2 EO 3S S = 600 6 20.00
3 EO 3S W+3 -690 26 86.67 µ Tbl = 48,89 %
A.3 Gaetan van de Werve -Hugo Baetens 59,86 %
7 EO 4P N = 620 2 6.67
8 EO 4PcS-2 -300 9 30.00
9 EO 4C S-1 -50 14 46.67 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
A.9 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 52,92 %
10 EO 3C E = -140 20 66.67
11 EO 2P E-1 50 10 33.33
12 EO 4C N+1 650 6 20.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A.4 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 47,50 %
13 EO 3S W-1 100 23 76.67
14 EO 4T E = -130 10 33.33
15 EO 3C S = 140 5 16.67 µ Tbl = 42,22 %
A10 Peter Masterson -Michele Verhulst 45,83 %
16 EO 4C N-1 -50 20 66.67
17 EO 3T E-1 50 13 43.33
18 EO 4C N+2 680 13 43.33 µ Tbl = 51,11 %
A.5 Jeannine Wanderpepen -Francoise Turin 51,11 %
19 EO 2C E+2 -170 17 56.67
20 EO 3S W-1 100 12 40.00
21 EO 4P W+1 -450 19 63.33 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Grazia Neuenschwander 44,86 %
22 EO 2P S+1 140 11 36.67
23 EO 4P E = -620 0 0.00
24 EO 4CcW-2 300 2 6.67 µ Tbl = 14,44 %
A.6 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy 49,17 %
25 EO 5T N-1 -50 4 13.33
26 EO 1S W+2 -150 3 10.00
27 EO 4C W = -420 12 40.00 µ Tbl = 21,11 %
Total : 269,0 / 720 = 37,36 %
|