B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 66,14 A12 Prisca Tondreau -Diane Deslignes
--- 2 57,99 A11 Patrick Gilles -Marianne Falla
--- 3 57,05 A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh
--- 4 57,01 A13 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski
--- 5 56,06 A.4 Yolande Waerseggers -Therese Dumont de Ch.
--- 6 55,15 A10 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier
--- 7 50,55 A.9 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten
--- 8 49,34 A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens
--- 9 45,45 A.5 Marc Antoine de Halloy -Chantal de Locht
--- 10 44,19 A.8 Philippe van der Gracht -Mercedes Steed
--- 11 42,46 A.6 Stan Tabor -Marie J. de Wagheneire
--- 12 41,69 A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Martine Zens
--- 13 41,33 A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Grazia Neuenschwander
--- 14 35,64 A14 Muriel de Ceuninck -Marina De Longree
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 63,60 a.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Charlotte de Wasseige
--- 2 55,83 a.8 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver
--- 3 55,27 a13 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere
--- 4 54,72 a.1 Lydia Luyten -Ghislain le Hardy de B.
--- 5 53,37 a.5 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve
--- 6 49,75 a12 Magda Moortgat -Philippe Gille
--- 7 49,58 a.2 Francoise Turin -Michel Paquot
--- 8 49,43 a.6 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw
--- 9 47,82 a.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Michel Lievens
--- 10 47,35 a.9 Gerard Cooreman -Helene Christiaens
--- 11 44,53 a14 Andre Delacroix -Sandra Dallemagne
--- 12 44,51 a.4 Jeannine Thys -Jacques Podevyn
--- 13 42,95 a11 Dominique Sassen -Francoise Duren
--- 14 41,25 a10 Chantal Barro -Isabelle de Vanssay
PAIRE A12 Prisca Tondreau -Diane Deslignes
a.9 Gerard Cooreman -Helene Christiaens 47,35 %
1 NS 4C N = 420 11 50.00
2 NS 6C W-1 50 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.8 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver 55,83 %
3 NS 1S S = 90 6 27.27
4 NS 2T W = -90 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Charlotte de Wasseige 63,60 %
5 NS 3S N+1 630 11 50.00
6 NS 3S W-1 100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.6 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 49,43 %
7 NS 2T S = 90 6 27.27
8 NS 3C E = -140 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.4 Jeannine Thys -Jacques Podevyn 44,51 %
9 NS 3P N+2 200 18 81.82
10 NS 2T E-2 200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
a.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Michel Lievens 47,82 %
11 NS 3C N = 140 21 95.45
12 NS 1S E+1 -120 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
a.2 Francoise Turin -Michel Paquot 49,58 %
13 NS 2P W-2 200 21 95.45
14 NS 3S S = 400 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 97,73 %
a.1 Lydia Luyten -Ghislain le Hardy de B. 54,72 %
15 NS 3S S+1 630 20 90.91
16 NS 3S W = -600 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a14 Andre Delacroix -Sandra Dallemagne 44,53 %
17 NS 3CcS-1 -100 22 100.00
18 NS 1S S-1 -100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a12 Magda Moortgat -Philippe Gille 49,75 %
23 NS 3S E = -600 14 63.64
24 NS 3P N-1 -50 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a11 Dominique Sassen -Francoise Duren 42,95 %
25 NS 4C N = 420 11 50.00
26 NS 4C N = 620 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a10 Chantal Barro -Isabelle de Vanssay 41,25 %
27 NS 3P E = -140 15 68.18
28 NS 2T W+1 -110 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
Total : 349,2 / 528 = 66,14 %
PAIRE A11 Patrick Gilles -Marianne Falla
a.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Charlotte de Wasseige 63,60 %
1 NS 3C N+1 170 4 18.18
2 NS 6S W = -990 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
a.6 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 49,43 %
3 NS Pass Passe 4 18.18
4 NS 3S W-1 100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.5 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 53,37 %
5 NS 3S N+2 660 19 86.36
6 NS 3S W-1 100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 73,18 %
a.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Michel Lievens 47,82 %
7 NS 2S S-1 -100 2 9.09
8 NS 3C E = -140 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.2 Francoise Turin -Michel Paquot 49,58 %
9 NS 2P N+1 140 9 40.91
10 NS 3P W = -140 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a.1 Lydia Luyten -Ghislain le Hardy de B. 54,72 %
11 NS 3C N-1 -50 12 54.55
12 NS 3T E+1 -130 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a14 Andre Delacroix -Sandra Dallemagne 44,53 %
13 NS 3P E-2 200 21 95.45
14 NS 3CcW-1 100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a13 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 55,27 %
15 NS 3S N = 600 10 45.45
16 NS 3S E-1 100 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a11 Dominique Sassen -Francoise Duren 42,95 %
21 NS 5C E+1 -480 12 54.55
22 NS 3S S+2 460 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a10 Chantal Barro -Isabelle de Vanssay 41,25 %
23 NS 5KcW-3 800 22 100.00
24 NS 3P N = 140 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 95,45 %
a.9 Gerard Cooreman -Helene Christiaens 47,35 %
25 NS 4C N = 420 11 50.00
26 NS 4C N+1 650 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a.8 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver 55,83 %
27 NS 4P E+1 -450 0 0.00
28 NS 2T W+1 -110 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
Total : 306,2 / 528 = 57,99 %
PAIRE A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh
a12 Magda Moortgat -Philippe Gille 49,75 %
1 NS 4C N = 420 11 50.00
2 NS 4C W+1 -450 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a11 Dominique Sassen -Francoise Duren 42,95 %
3 NS 2C S+1 140 19 86.36
4 NS 2S W+1 -150 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a10 Chantal Barro -Isabelle de Vanssay 41,25 %
5 NS 3S N+2 660 19 86.36
6 NS 3S W-1 100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 73,18 %
a.9 Gerard Cooreman -Helene Christiaens 47,35 %
7 NS 1S S+1 120 15 68.18
8 NS 2C E+1 -140 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Charlotte de Wasseige 63,60 %
13 NS 2S N-1 -100 10 45.45
14 NS 2C W-1 50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.6 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 49,43 %
15 NS 3S S = 600 10 45.45
16 NS 4T E = -130 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a.5 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 53,37 %
17 NS 4K W = -130 17 77.27
18 NS 2P W-1 50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a.4 Jeannine Thys -Jacques Podevyn 44,51 %
19 NS 3KcS-2 -300 0 0.00
20 NS 3S S-1 -100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Michel Lievens 47,82 %
21 NS 4C E+2 -480 12 54.55
22 NS 4C S = 420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.2 Francoise Turin -Michel Paquot 49,58 %
23 NS 3S E = -600 14 63.64
24 NS 4P N-1 -50 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.1 Lydia Luyten -Ghislain le Hardy de B. 54,72 %
25 NS 4C N = 420 11 50.00
26 NS 4C N+1 650 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a13 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 55,27 %
27 NS 3S W-2 100 22 100.00
28 NS 2T W+1 -110 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
Total : 301,2 / 528 = 57,05 %
PAIRE A13 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski
a11 Dominique Sassen -Francoise Duren 42,95 %
1 NS 4C N = 420 11 50.00
2 NS 6C W-1 50 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a10 Chantal Barro -Isabelle de Vanssay 41,25 %
3 NS 2C S = 110 11 50.00
4 NS 2C N+1 140 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a.9 Gerard Cooreman -Helene Christiaens 47,35 %
5 NS 3S N+2 660 19 86.36
6 NS 50%50% Ajust 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.8 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver 55,83 %
7 NS 2T S = 90 6 27.27
8 NS 3C E+1 -170 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Charlotte de Wasseige 63,60 %
9 NS 3P N+2 200 18 81.82
10 NS 3P W+1 -170 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.5 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 53,37 %
11 NS 4C N-2 -100 5 22.73
12 NS 2K S-1 -100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.4 Jeannine Thys -Jacques Podevyn 44,51 %
13 NS 3P W-1 100 16 72.73
14 NS 3T S+2 150 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Michel Lievens 47,82 %
15 NS 3S S = 600 10 45.45
16 NS 5T E-1 100 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a.2 Francoise Turin -Michel Paquot 49,58 %
17 NS 3K W+1 -130 17 77.27
18 NS 2C S-1 -100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.1 Lydia Luyten -Ghislain le Hardy de B. 54,72 %
19 NS 2K S-1 -50 18 81.82
20 NS 3P S-2 -200 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a13 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 55,27 %
25 NS 4C N = 420 11 50.00
26 NS 3C N+2 200 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a12 Magda Moortgat -Philippe Gille 49,75 %
27 NS 3P E = -140 15 68.18
28 NS 2P S-2 -200 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
Total : 301,0 / 528 = 57,01 %
PAIRE A.4 Yolande Waerseggers -Therese Dumont de Ch.
a.6 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 49,43 %
1 NS 4C N = 420 11 50.00
2 NS 6C W-1 50 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.4 Jeannine Thys -Jacques Podevyn 44,51 %
7 NS 1S S+1 120 15 68.18
8 NS 4C E-1 50 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
a.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Michel Lievens 47,82 %
9 NS 3P N+2 200 18 81.82
10 NS 3P W+1 -170 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.2 Francoise Turin -Michel Paquot 49,58 %
11 NS 4K E-2 100 18 81.82
12 NS 3T E+1 -130 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.1 Lydia Luyten -Ghislain le Hardy de B. 54,72 %
13 NS 2P W-1 100 16 72.73
14 NS 4T S+1 150 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a14 Andre Delacroix -Sandra Dallemagne 44,53 %
15 NS 3S S = 600 10 45.45
16 NS 3K S-1 -50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a13 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 55,27 %
17 NS 3S W+1 -430 3 13.64
18 NS 2C S-1 -100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a12 Magda Moortgat -Philippe Gille 49,75 %
19 NS 3S E-1 100 22 100.00
20 NS 1K W+2 -110 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a10 Chantal Barro -Isabelle de Vanssay 41,25 %
21 NS 4C E+2 -480 12 54.55
22 NS 3S N+1 430 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a.9 Gerard Cooreman -Helene Christiaens 47,35 %
23 NS 3S E = -600 14 63.64
24 NS 4C W = -420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a.8 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver 55,83 %
25 NS 4C N = 420 11 50.00
26 NS 3C N+2 200 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Charlotte de Wasseige 63,60 %
27 NS 4P E = -420 6 27.27
28 NS 2T W+1 -110 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
Total : 296,0 / 528 = 56,06 %
PAIRE A10 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier
a.5 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 53,37 %
1 NS 4C N+1 450 20 90.91
2 NS 6C E-1 50 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
a.4 Jeannine Thys -Jacques Podevyn 44,51 %
3 NS 1S S+2 150 22 100.00
4 NS 2K E+2 -130 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a.2 Francoise Turin -Michel Paquot 49,58 %
5 NS 4P S = 620 4 18.18
6 NS 3S W-1 100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 39,09 %
a.1 Lydia Luyten -Ghislain le Hardy de B. 54,72 %
7 NS 2S S = 120 15 68.18
8 NS 3C E+1 -170 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a14 Andre Delacroix -Sandra Dallemagne 44,53 %
9 NS 4P N = 420 22 100.00
10 NS 4P W = -620 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a13 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 55,27 %
11 NS 4C N-3 -150 0 0.00
12 NS 4T W = -130 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
a12 Magda Moortgat -Philippe Gille 49,75 %
13 NS 3P W-1 100 16 72.73
14 NS 4C W-2 100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a10 Chantal Barro -Isabelle de Vanssay 41,25 %
19 NS 3T W+1 -130 9 40.91
20 NS 2P S = 110 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a.9 Gerard Cooreman -Helene Christiaens 47,35 %
21 NS 4C E+2 -480 12 54.55
22 NS 4C S+1 450 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a.8 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver 55,83 %
23 NS 3S E+1 -630 8 36.36
24 NS 2C W+1 -140 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Charlotte de Wasseige 63,60 %
25 NS 4C N = 420 11 50.00
26 NS 4C N+1 650 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a.6 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 49,43 %
27 NS 4P E = -420 6 27.27
28 NS 2T W+1 -110 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
Total : 291,2 / 528 = 55,15 %
PAIRE A.9 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten
a.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Michel Lievens 47,82 %
1 NS 4C N = 420 11 50.00
2 NS 3C E+3 -230 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a.1 Lydia Luyten -Ghislain le Hardy de B. 54,72 %
3 NS 2C S = 110 11 50.00
4 NS 2S W+1 -150 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a14 Andre Delacroix -Sandra Dallemagne 44,53 %
5 NS 3S N+2 660 19 86.36
6 NS 3S W-2 200 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 92,95 %
a13 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 55,27 %
7 NS 3S S = 600 22 100.00
8 NS 4C E = -420 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a12 Magda Moortgat -Philippe Gille 49,75 %
9 NS 2P N = 110 5 22.73
10 NS 2P W+2 -170 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a11 Dominique Sassen -Francoise Duren 42,95 %
11 NS 4K E-1 50 16 72.73
12 NS 2P S = 110 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
a.9 Gerard Cooreman -Helene Christiaens 47,35 %
17 NS 3S W = -400 7 31.82
18 NS 1S S-3 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
a.8 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver 55,83 %
19 NS 1S E+2 -150 3 13.64
20 NS 1P S+1 110 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Charlotte de Wasseige 63,60 %
21 NS 6C E = -980 0 0.00
22 NS 4C S+1 450 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.6 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 49,43 %
23 NS 3S E-1 100 20 90.91
24 NS 3C W = -140 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a.5 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 53,37 %
25 NS 4C N = 420 11 50.00
26 NS 5T W-3 300 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.4 Jeannine Thys -Jacques Podevyn 44,51 %
27 NS 4P E-1 50 19 86.36
28 NS 3ScE+1 -650 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
Total : 266,9 / 528 = 50,55 %
PAIRE A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens
a.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Michel Lievens 47,82 %
5 NS 3S N+1 630 11 50.00
6 NS 4CcN-2 -300 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
a.2 Francoise Turin -Michel Paquot 49,58 %
7 NS 2S S-2 -200 0 0.00
8 NS 3C E+1 -170 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
a.1 Lydia Luyten -Ghislain le Hardy de B. 54,72 %
9 NS 3P N = 140 9 40.91
10 NS 2P W+2 -170 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a14 Andre Delacroix -Sandra Dallemagne 44,53 %
11 NS 4C N-2 -100 5 22.73
12 NS 1S E+2 -150 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
a13 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 55,27 %
13 NS 2P W = -110 4 18.18
14 NS 4P S-2 -100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
a12 Magda Moortgat -Philippe Gille 49,75 %
15 NS 3S S+1 630 20 90.91
16 NS 2K S = 90 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
a11 Dominique Sassen -Francoise Duren 42,95 %
17 NS 4K W = -130 17 77.27
18 NS 2C S = 110 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
a.9 Gerard Cooreman -Helene Christiaens 47,35 %
19 NS 2K S-1 -50 18 81.82
20 NS 2P S-1 -100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.8 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver 55,83 %
21 NS 4C E+2 -480 12 54.55
22 NS 4C S = 420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Charlotte de Wasseige 63,60 %
23 NS 2KcS-3 -800 2 9.09
24 NS 4PcN = 590 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.6 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 49,43 %
25 NS 4C N = 420 11 50.00
26 NS 4C N+1 650 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a.5 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 53,37 %
27 NS 4P E = -420 6 27.27
28 NS 3T W-1 50 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
Total : 260,5 / 528 = 49,34 %
PAIRE A.5 Marc Antoine de Halloy -Chantal de Locht
a.8 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver 55,83 %
1 NS 4C N+1 450 20 90.91
2 NS 4C W+2 -480 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Charlotte de Wasseige 63,60 %
3 NS 1S S-1 -50 1 4.55
4 NS 3C N-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 2,27 %
a.5 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 53,37 %
9 NS 3C N-1 -50 1 4.55
10 NS 3P W = -140 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a.4 Jeannine Thys -Jacques Podevyn 44,51 %
11 NS 3CcN-1 -100 5 22.73
12 NS 3S E-1 50 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Michel Lievens 47,82 %
13 NS 2P W = -110 4 18.18
14 NS 3C W-1 50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.2 Francoise Turin -Michel Paquot 49,58 %
15 NS 3S N = 600 10 45.45
16 NS 3T E = -110 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.1 Lydia Luyten -Ghislain le Hardy de B. 54,72 %
17 NS 3S W = -400 7 31.82
18 NS 1S N = 90 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a14 Andre Delacroix -Sandra Dallemagne 44,53 %
19 NS 2C W = -110 13 59.09
20 NS 3P S-1 -100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a13 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 55,27 %
21 NS 4C E+2 -480 12 54.55
22 NS 4C S = 420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a11 Dominique Sassen -Francoise Duren 42,95 %
23 NS 3S E+1 -630 8 36.36
24 NS 3C W = -140 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a10 Chantal Barro -Isabelle de Vanssay 41,25 %
25 NS 3S S+1 430 22 100.00
26 NS 3C N+2 200 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.9 Gerard Cooreman -Helene Christiaens 47,35 %
27 NS 3S W = -400 12 54.55
28 NS 2T W+1 -110 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
Total : 240,0 / 528 = 45,45 %
PAIRE A.8 Philippe van der Gracht -Mercedes Steed
a14 Andre Delacroix -Sandra Dallemagne 44,53 %
1 NS 4C N+1 450 20 90.91
2 NS 6C W = -980 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a13 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 55,27 %
3 NS 2C S+1 140 19 86.36
4 NS 2S W-1 100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
a12 Magda Moortgat -Philippe Gille 49,75 %
5 NS 4P S = 620 4 18.18
6 NS 5T W = -600 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 14,32 %
a11 Dominique Sassen -Francoise Duren 42,95 %
7 NS 1S S = 90 6 27.27
8 NS 2C E+2 -170 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a10 Chantal Barro -Isabelle de Vanssay 41,25 %
9 NS 3P N+1 170 13 59.09
10 NS 2P W+2 -170 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.8 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver 55,83 %
15 NS 3S N+1 630 20 90.91
16 NS 3K S-2 -100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Charlotte de Wasseige 63,60 %
17 NS 2S W+2 -180 12 54.55
18 NS 2C S-2 -200 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a.6 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 49,43 %
19 NS 2K S-1 -50 18 81.82
20 NS 2P S-1 -100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.5 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 53,37 %
21 NS 4C E+2 -480 12 54.55
22 NS 6CcS-2 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.4 Jeannine Thys -Jacques Podevyn 44,51 %
23 NS 3S E+1 -630 8 36.36
24 NS 3P N-1 -50 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Michel Lievens 47,82 %
25 NS 4C N-1 -50 0 0.00
26 NS 2C N+2 170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.2 Francoise Turin -Michel Paquot 49,58 %
27 NS 4P E = -420 6 27.27
28 NS 3T W = -110 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
Total : 233,3 / 528 = 44,19 %
PAIRE A.6 Stan Tabor -Marie J. de Wagheneire
a10 Chantal Barro -Isabelle de Vanssay 41,25 %
1 NS 4C N = 420 11 50.00
2 NS 6C W = -980 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.9 Gerard Cooreman -Helene Christiaens 47,35 %
3 NS 2C S = 110 11 50.00
4 NS 4K E+1 -150 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.8 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver 55,83 %
5 NS 3S N+1 630 11 50.00
6 NS 3S W-1 100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.6 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 49,43 %
11 NS 3C N-1 -50 12 54.55
12 NS 3T E+1 -130 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.5 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 53,37 %
13 NS 1S N = 90 12 54.55
14 NS 2CcW = -470 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.4 Jeannine Thys -Jacques Podevyn 44,51 %
15 NS 3S S = 600 10 45.45
16 NS 4T E = -130 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Michel Lievens 47,82 %
17 NS 3S W+1 -430 3 13.64
18 NS 2C S+1 140 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a.2 Francoise Turin -Michel Paquot 49,58 %
19 NS 3T W+1 -130 9 40.91
20 NS 4P S-3 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
a.1 Lydia Luyten -Ghislain le Hardy de B. 54,72 %
21 NS 4C E+2 -480 12 54.55
22 NS 3S N = 400 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a14 Andre Delacroix -Sandra Dallemagne 44,53 %
23 NS 4CcN-4 -1100 0 0.00
24 NS 4C W-1 50 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a12 Magda Moortgat -Philippe Gille 49,75 %
25 NS 4C N = 420 11 50.00
26 NS 4C N+1 650 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a11 Dominique Sassen -Francoise Duren 42,95 %
27 NS 4P E-1 50 19 86.36
28 NS 2T W+2 -130 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
Total : 224,2 / 528 = 42,46 %
PAIRE A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Martine Zens
a.2 Francoise Turin -Michel Paquot 49,58 %
3 NS 2C S = 110 11 50.00
4 NS 3K E-1 100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a.1 Lydia Luyten -Ghislain le Hardy de B. 54,72 %
5 NS 3S N+1 630 11 50.00
6 NS 5T W+1 -620 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a14 Andre Delacroix -Sandra Dallemagne 44,53 %
7 NS 2S S = 120 15 68.18
8 NS 3C E+1 -170 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a13 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 55,27 %
9 NS 2P N = 110 5 22.73
10 NS 2P W+1 -140 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a12 Magda Moortgat -Philippe Gille 49,75 %
11 NS 3C N = 140 21 95.45
12 NS 3S E = -400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a11 Dominique Sassen -Francoise Duren 42,95 %
13 NS 2P W = -110 4 18.18
14 NS 2P E-3 150 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a10 Chantal Barro -Isabelle de Vanssay 41,25 %
15 NS 3S N = 600 10 45.45
16 NS 3T E = -110 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.8 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver 55,83 %
17 NS 3S W+2 -460 0 0.00
18 NS 1S N-1 -100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Charlotte de Wasseige 63,60 %
19 NS 3T W+2 -150 3 13.64
20 NS 2P S-1 -100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a.6 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 49,43 %
21 NS 4C E+2 -480 12 54.55
22 NS 4C S = 420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.5 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 53,37 %
23 NS 3S E+2 -660 4 18.18
24 NS 3C W = -140 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
a.4 Jeannine Thys -Jacques Podevyn 44,51 %
25 NS 4C N = 420 11 50.00
26 NS 3C N+2 200 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
Total : 220,1 / 528 = 41,69 %
PAIRE A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Grazia Neuenschwander
a.1 Lydia Luyten -Ghislain le Hardy de B. 54,72 %
1 NS 4C N-1 -50 1 4.55
2 NS 6C W = -980 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
a14 Andre Delacroix -Sandra Dallemagne 44,53 %
3 NS 1S S+1 120 16 72.73
4 NS 2S W+1 -150 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a13 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 55,27 %
5 NS 4P S = 620 4 18.18
6 NS 3S W-1 100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 39,09 %
a12 Magda Moortgat -Philippe Gille 49,75 %
7 NS 2S N = 120 15 68.18
8 NS 3C E+1 -170 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a11 Dominique Sassen -Francoise Duren 42,95 %
9 NS 3P N+1 170 13 59.09
10 NS 2P W+1 -140 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a10 Chantal Barro -Isabelle de Vanssay 41,25 %
11 NS 3C N-1 -50 12 54.55
12 NS 3T E+1 -130 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.9 Gerard Cooreman -Helene Christiaens 47,35 %
13 NS 2P W = -110 4 18.18
14 NS 4K W-2 100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Charlotte de Wasseige 63,60 %
15 NS 3S N-1 -100 1 4.55
16 NS 3S E = -600 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 4,55 %
a.6 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 49,43 %
17 NS 2S W+3 -210 10 45.45
18 NS 1S S-1 -100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.5 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 53,37 %
19 NS 2C W+1 -140 6 27.27
20 NS 4P S-2 -200 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
a.4 Jeannine Thys -Jacques Podevyn 44,51 %
21 NS 4C E+2 -480 12 54.55
22 NS 4C S = 420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Michel Lievens 47,82 %
23 NS 2S E+1 -150 18 81.82
24 NS 4T S-1 -50 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
Total : 218,2 / 528 = 41,33 %
PAIRE A14 Muriel de Ceuninck -Marina De Longree
a13 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 55,27 %
1 NS 4C N-1 -50 1 4.55
2 NS 6C W = -980 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
a12 Magda Moortgat -Philippe Gille 49,75 %
3 NS 3C S-1 -50 1 4.55
4 NS 2S W = -120 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a11 Dominique Sassen -Francoise Duren 42,95 %
5 NS 3S N = 600 0 0.00
6 NS 3S W-1 100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
a10 Chantal Barro -Isabelle de Vanssay 41,25 %
7 NS 2S S = 120 15 68.18
8 NS 4C E = -420 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.9 Gerard Cooreman -Helene Christiaens 47,35 %
9 NS 3P N-1 -50 1 4.55
10 NS 2P W+1 -140 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a.8 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver 55,83 %
11 NS 4C N-2 -100 5 22.73
12 NS 3T E+1 -130 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a.6 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 49,43 %
13 NS 2P W = -110 4 18.18
14 NS 2C W-1 50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.5 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 53,37 %
15 NS 3S S-1 -100 1 4.55
16 NS 3T E = -110 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a.4 Jeannine Thys -Jacques Podevyn 44,51 %
17 NS 4K W = -130 17 77.27
18 NS 1S N-2 -200 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Michel Lievens 47,82 %
19 NS 2C W = -110 13 59.09
20 NS 3P S = 140 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
a.2 Francoise Turin -Michel Paquot 49,58 %
21 NS 4C E+2 -480 12 54.55
22 NS 6S N-4 -200 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a14 Andre Delacroix -Sandra Dallemagne 44,53 %
27 NS 4P E = -420 6 27.27
28 NS 2T W+1 -110 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
Total : 188,2 / 528 = 35,64 %
PAIRE a.7 Jean de Villenfagne -Charlotte de Wasseige
A11 Patrick Gilles -Marianne Falla 57,99 %
1 EO 3C N+1 170 18 81.82
2 EO 6S W = -990 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
A.5 Marc Antoine de Halloy -Chantal de Locht 45,45 %
3 EO 1S S-1 -50 21 95.45
4 EO 3C N-2 -200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 97,73 %
A12 Prisca Tondreau -Diane Deslignes 66,14 %
5 EO 3S N+1 630 11 50.00
6 EO 3S W-1 100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 57,01 %
9 EO 3P N+2 200 4 18.18
10 EO 3P W+1 -170 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 57,05 %
13 EO 2S N-1 -100 12 54.55
14 EO 2C W-1 50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Grazia Neuenschwander 41,33 %
15 EO 3S N-1 -100 21 95.45
16 EO 3S E = -600 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 95,45 %
A.8 Philippe van der Gracht -Mercedes Steed 44,19 %
17 EO 2S W+2 -180 10 45.45
18 EO 2C S-2 -200 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Martine Zens 41,69 %
19 EO 3T W+2 -150 19 86.36
20 EO 2P S-1 -100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A.9 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten 50,55 %
21 EO 6C E = -980 22 100.00
22 EO 4C S+1 450 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 49,34 %
23 EO 2KcS-3 -800 20 90.91
24 EO 4PcN = 590 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A10 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 55,15 %
25 EO 4C N = 420 11 50.00
26 EO 4C N+1 650 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.4 Yolande Waerseggers -Therese Dumont de Ch. 56,06 %
27 EO 4P E = -420 16 72.73
28 EO 2T W+1 -110 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
Total : 335,8 / 528 = 63,60 %
PAIRE a.8 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver
A.5 Marc Antoine de Halloy -Chantal de Locht 45,45 %
1 EO 4C N+1 450 2 9.09
2 EO 4C W+2 -480 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A12 Prisca Tondreau -Diane Deslignes 66,14 %
3 EO 1S S = 90 16 72.73
4 EO 2T W = -90 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.6 Stan Tabor -Marie J. de Wagheneire 42,46 %
5 EO 3S N+1 630 11 50.00
6 EO 3S W-1 100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 57,01 %
7 EO 2T S = 90 16 72.73
8 EO 3C E+1 -170 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A14 Muriel de Ceuninck -Marina De Longree 35,64 %
11 EO 4C N-2 -100 17 77.27
12 EO 3T E+1 -130 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A.8 Philippe van der Gracht -Mercedes Steed 44,19 %
15 EO 3S N+1 630 2 9.09
16 EO 3K S-2 -100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Martine Zens 41,69 %
17 EO 3S W+2 -460 22 100.00
18 EO 1S N-1 -100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.9 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten 50,55 %
19 EO 1S E+2 -150 19 86.36
20 EO 1P S+1 110 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 49,34 %
21 EO 4C E+2 -480 10 45.45
22 EO 4C S = 420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A10 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 55,15 %
23 EO 3S E+1 -630 14 63.64
24 EO 2C W+1 -140 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A.4 Yolande Waerseggers -Therese Dumont de Ch. 56,06 %
25 EO 4C N = 420 11 50.00
26 EO 3C N+2 200 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A11 Patrick Gilles -Marianne Falla 57,99 %
27 EO 4P E+1 -450 22 100.00
28 EO 2T W+1 -110 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
Total : 294,8 / 528 = 55,83 %
PAIRE a13 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere
A14 Muriel de Ceuninck -Marina De Longree 35,64 %
1 EO 4C N-1 -50 21 95.45
2 EO 6C W = -980 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
A.8 Philippe van der Gracht -Mercedes Steed 44,19 %
3 EO 2C S+1 140 3 13.64
4 EO 2S W-1 100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Grazia Neuenschwander 41,33 %
5 EO 4P S = 620 18 81.82
6 EO 3S W-1 100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 60,91 %
A.9 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten 50,55 %
7 EO 3S S = 600 0 0.00
8 EO 4C E = -420 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Martine Zens 41,69 %
9 EO 2P N = 110 17 77.27
10 EO 2P W+1 -140 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A10 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 55,15 %
11 EO 4C N-3 -150 22 100.00
12 EO 4T W = -130 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 49,34 %
13 EO 2P W = -110 18 81.82
14 EO 4P S-2 -100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
A11 Patrick Gilles -Marianne Falla 57,99 %
15 EO 3S N = 600 12 54.55
16 EO 3S E-1 100 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A.4 Yolande Waerseggers -Therese Dumont de Ch. 56,06 %
17 EO 3S W+1 -430 19 86.36
18 EO 2C S-1 -100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A.5 Marc Antoine de Halloy -Chantal de Locht 45,45 %
21 EO 4C E+2 -480 10 45.45
22 EO 4C S = 420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 57,01 %
25 EO 4C N = 420 11 50.00
26 EO 3C N+2 200 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 57,05 %
27 EO 3S W-2 100 0 0.00
28 EO 2T W+1 -110 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
Total : 291,8 / 528 = 55,27 %
PAIRE a.1 Lydia Luyten -Ghislain le Hardy de B.
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Grazia Neuenschwander 41,33 %
1 EO 4C N-1 -50 21 95.45
2 EO 6C W = -980 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
A.9 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten 50,55 %
3 EO 2C S = 110 11 50.00
4 EO 2S W+1 -150 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Martine Zens 41,69 %
5 EO 3S N+1 630 11 50.00
6 EO 5T W+1 -620 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A10 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 55,15 %
7 EO 2S S = 120 7 31.82
8 EO 3C E+1 -170 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 49,34 %
9 EO 3P N = 140 13 59.09
10 EO 2P W+2 -170 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A11 Patrick Gilles -Marianne Falla 57,99 %
11 EO 3C N-1 -50 10 45.45
12 EO 3T E+1 -130 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.4 Yolande Waerseggers -Therese Dumont de Ch. 56,06 %
13 EO 2P W-1 100 6 27.27
14 EO 4T S+1 150 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A12 Prisca Tondreau -Diane Deslignes 66,14 %
15 EO 3S S+1 630 2 9.09
16 EO 3S W = -600 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.5 Marc Antoine de Halloy -Chantal de Locht 45,45 %
17 EO 3S W = -400 15 68.18
18 EO 1S N = 90 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 57,01 %
19 EO 2K S-1 -50 4 18.18
20 EO 3P S-2 -200 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.6 Stan Tabor -Marie J. de Wagheneire 42,46 %
21 EO 4C E+2 -480 10 45.45
22 EO 3S N = 400 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 57,05 %
25 EO 4C N = 420 11 50.00
26 EO 4C N+1 650 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
Total : 288,9 / 528 = 54,72 %
PAIRE a.5 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve
A10 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 55,15 %
1 EO 4C N+1 450 2 9.09
2 EO 6C E-1 50 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
A11 Patrick Gilles -Marianne Falla 57,99 %
5 EO 3S N+2 660 3 13.64
6 EO 3S W-1 100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 26,82 %
A.5 Marc Antoine de Halloy -Chantal de Locht 45,45 %
9 EO 3C N-1 -50 21 95.45
10 EO 3P W = -140 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 57,01 %
11 EO 4C N-2 -100 17 77.27
12 EO 2K S-1 -100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.6 Stan Tabor -Marie J. de Wagheneire 42,46 %
13 EO 1S N = 90 10 45.45
14 EO 2CcW = -470 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A14 Muriel de Ceuninck -Marina De Longree 35,64 %
15 EO 3S S-1 -100 21 95.45
16 EO 3T E = -110 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 57,05 %
17 EO 4K W = -130 5 22.73
18 EO 2P W-1 50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Grazia Neuenschwander 41,33 %
19 EO 2C W+1 -140 16 72.73
20 EO 4P S-2 -200 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
A.8 Philippe van der Gracht -Mercedes Steed 44,19 %
21 EO 4C E+2 -480 10 45.45
22 EO 6CcS-2 -300 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Martine Zens 41,69 %
23 EO 3S E+2 -660 18 81.82
24 EO 3C W = -140 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
A.9 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten 50,55 %
25 EO 4C N = 420 11 50.00
26 EO 5T W-3 300 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 49,34 %
27 EO 4P E = -420 16 72.73
28 EO 3T W-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
Total : 281,8 / 528 = 53,37 %
PAIRE a12 Magda Moortgat -Philippe Gille
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 57,05 %
1 EO 4C N = 420 11 50.00
2 EO 4C W+1 -450 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A14 Muriel de Ceuninck -Marina De Longree 35,64 %
3 EO 3C S-1 -50 21 95.45
4 EO 2S W = -120 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A.8 Philippe van der Gracht -Mercedes Steed 44,19 %
5 EO 4P S = 620 18 81.82
6 EO 5T W = -600 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 85,68 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Grazia Neuenschwander 41,33 %
7 EO 2S N = 120 7 31.82
8 EO 3C E+1 -170 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.9 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten 50,55 %
9 EO 2P N = 110 17 77.27
10 EO 2P W+2 -170 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Martine Zens 41,69 %
11 EO 3C N = 140 1 4.55
12 EO 3S E = -400 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A10 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 55,15 %
13 EO 3P W-1 100 6 27.27
14 EO 4C W-2 100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 49,34 %
15 EO 3S S+1 630 2 9.09
16 EO 2K S = 90 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
A.4 Yolande Waerseggers -Therese Dumont de Ch. 56,06 %
19 EO 3S E-1 100 0 0.00
20 EO 1K W+2 -110 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A12 Prisca Tondreau -Diane Deslignes 66,14 %
23 EO 3S E = -600 8 36.36
24 EO 3P N-1 -50 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.6 Stan Tabor -Marie J. de Wagheneire 42,46 %
25 EO 4C N = 420 11 50.00
26 EO 4C N+1 650 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 57,01 %
27 EO 3P E = -140 7 31.82
28 EO 2P S-2 -200 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
Total : 262,7 / 528 = 49,75 %
PAIRE a.2 Francoise Turin -Michel Paquot
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Martine Zens 41,69 %
3 EO 2C S = 110 11 50.00
4 EO 3K E-1 100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A10 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 55,15 %
5 EO 4P S = 620 18 81.82
6 EO 3S W-1 100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 60,91 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 49,34 %
7 EO 2S S-2 -200 22 100.00
8 EO 3C E+1 -170 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
A11 Patrick Gilles -Marianne Falla 57,99 %
9 EO 2P N+1 140 13 59.09
10 EO 3P W = -140 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A.4 Yolande Waerseggers -Therese Dumont de Ch. 56,06 %
11 EO 4K E-2 100 4 18.18
12 EO 3T E+1 -130 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A12 Prisca Tondreau -Diane Deslignes 66,14 %
13 EO 2P W-2 200 1 4.55
14 EO 3S S = 400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 2,27 %
A.5 Marc Antoine de Halloy -Chantal de Locht 45,45 %
15 EO 3S N = 600 12 54.55
16 EO 3T E = -110 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 57,01 %
17 EO 3K W+1 -130 5 22.73
18 EO 2C S-1 -100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.6 Stan Tabor -Marie J. de Wagheneire 42,46 %
19 EO 3T W+1 -130 13 59.09
20 EO 4P S-3 -300 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
A14 Muriel de Ceuninck -Marina De Longree 35,64 %
21 EO 4C E+2 -480 10 45.45
22 EO 6S N-4 -200 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 57,05 %
23 EO 3S E = -600 8 36.36
24 EO 4P N-1 -50 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.8 Philippe van der Gracht -Mercedes Steed 44,19 %
27 EO 4P E = -420 16 72.73
28 EO 3T W = -110 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
Total : 261,8 / 528 = 49,58 %
PAIRE a.6 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw
A.4 Yolande Waerseggers -Therese Dumont de Ch. 56,06 %
1 EO 4C N = 420 11 50.00
2 EO 6C W-1 50 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A11 Patrick Gilles -Marianne Falla 57,99 %
3 EO Pass Passe 18 81.82
4 EO 3S W-1 100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A12 Prisca Tondreau -Diane Deslignes 66,14 %
7 EO 2T S = 90 16 72.73
8 EO 3C E = -140 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.6 Stan Tabor -Marie J. de Wagheneire 42,46 %
11 EO 3C N-1 -50 10 45.45
12 EO 3T E+1 -130 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A14 Muriel de Ceuninck -Marina De Longree 35,64 %
13 EO 2P W = -110 18 81.82
14 EO 2C W-1 50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 57,05 %
15 EO 3S S = 600 12 54.55
16 EO 4T E = -130 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Grazia Neuenschwander 41,33 %
17 EO 2S W+3 -210 12 54.55
18 EO 1S S-1 -100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.8 Philippe van der Gracht -Mercedes Steed 44,19 %
19 EO 2K S-1 -50 4 18.18
20 EO 2P S-1 -100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Martine Zens 41,69 %
21 EO 4C E+2 -480 10 45.45
22 EO 4C S = 420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.9 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten 50,55 %
23 EO 3S E-1 100 2 9.09
24 EO 3C W = -140 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 49,34 %
25 EO 4C N = 420 11 50.00
26 EO 4C N+1 650 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A10 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 55,15 %
27 EO 4P E = -420 16 72.73
28 EO 2T W+1 -110 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
Total : 261,0 / 528 = 49,43 %
PAIRE a.3 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Michel Lievens
A.9 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten 50,55 %
1 EO 4C N = 420 11 50.00
2 EO 3C E+3 -230 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 49,34 %
5 EO 3S N+1 630 11 50.00
6 EO 4CcN-2 -300 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A11 Patrick Gilles -Marianne Falla 57,99 %
7 EO 2S S-1 -100 20 90.91
8 EO 3C E = -140 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.4 Yolande Waerseggers -Therese Dumont de Ch. 56,06 %
9 EO 3P N+2 200 4 18.18
10 EO 3P W+1 -170 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A12 Prisca Tondreau -Diane Deslignes 66,14 %
11 EO 3C N = 140 1 4.55
12 EO 1S E+1 -120 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
A.5 Marc Antoine de Halloy -Chantal de Locht 45,45 %
13 EO 2P W = -110 18 81.82
14 EO 3C W-1 50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 57,01 %
15 EO 3S S = 600 12 54.55
16 EO 5T E-1 100 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A.6 Stan Tabor -Marie J. de Wagheneire 42,46 %
17 EO 3S W+1 -430 19 86.36
18 EO 2C S+1 140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A14 Muriel de Ceuninck -Marina De Longree 35,64 %
19 EO 2C W = -110 9 40.91
20 EO 3P S = 140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 57,05 %
21 EO 4C E+2 -480 10 45.45
22 EO 4C S = 420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Grazia Neuenschwander 41,33 %
23 EO 2S E+1 -150 4 18.18
24 EO 4T S-1 -50 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A.8 Philippe van der Gracht -Mercedes Steed 44,19 %
25 EO 4C N-1 -50 22 100.00
26 EO 2C N+2 170 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 100,00 %
Total : 252,5 / 528 = 47,82 %
PAIRE a.9 Gerard Cooreman -Helene Christiaens
A12 Prisca Tondreau -Diane Deslignes 66,14 %
1 EO 4C N = 420 11 50.00
2 EO 6C W-1 50 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.6 Stan Tabor -Marie J. de Wagheneire 42,46 %
3 EO 2C S = 110 11 50.00
4 EO 4K E+1 -150 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 57,01 %
5 EO 3S N+2 660 3 13.64
6 EO 50%50% Ajust 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 57,05 %
7 EO 1S S+1 120 7 31.82
8 EO 2C E+1 -140 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A14 Muriel de Ceuninck -Marina De Longree 35,64 %
9 EO 3P N-1 -50 21 95.45
10 EO 2P W+1 -140 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Grazia Neuenschwander 41,33 %
13 EO 2P W = -110 18 81.82
14 EO 4K W-2 100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.9 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten 50,55 %
17 EO 3S W = -400 15 68.18
18 EO 1S S-3 -300 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 49,34 %
19 EO 2K S-1 -50 4 18.18
20 EO 2P S-1 -100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A10 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 55,15 %
21 EO 4C E+2 -480 10 45.45
22 EO 4C S+1 450 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A.4 Yolande Waerseggers -Therese Dumont de Ch. 56,06 %
23 EO 3S E = -600 8 36.36
24 EO 4C W = -420 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A11 Patrick Gilles -Marianne Falla 57,99 %
25 EO 4C N = 420 11 50.00
26 EO 4C N+1 650 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.5 Marc Antoine de Halloy -Chantal de Locht 45,45 %
27 EO 3S W = -400 10 45.45
28 EO 2T W+1 -110 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
Total : 250,0 / 528 = 47,35 %
PAIRE a14 Andre Delacroix -Sandra Dallemagne
A.8 Philippe van der Gracht -Mercedes Steed 44,19 %
1 EO 4C N+1 450 2 9.09
2 EO 6C W = -980 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Grazia Neuenschwander 41,33 %
3 EO 1S S+1 120 6 27.27
4 EO 2S W+1 -150 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.9 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten 50,55 %
5 EO 3S N+2 660 3 13.64
6 EO 3S W-2 200 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 7,05 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Martine Zens 41,69 %
7 EO 2S S = 120 7 31.82
8 EO 3C E+1 -170 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A10 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 55,15 %
9 EO 4P N = 420 0 0.00
10 EO 4P W = -620 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 49,34 %
11 EO 4C N-2 -100 17 77.27
12 EO 1S E+2 -150 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
A11 Patrick Gilles -Marianne Falla 57,99 %
13 EO 3P E-2 200 1 4.55
14 EO 3CcW-1 100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A.4 Yolande Waerseggers -Therese Dumont de Ch. 56,06 %
15 EO 3S S = 600 12 54.55
16 EO 3K S-1 -50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A12 Prisca Tondreau -Diane Deslignes 66,14 %
17 EO 3CcS-1 -100 0 0.00
18 EO 1S S-1 -100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A.5 Marc Antoine de Halloy -Chantal de Locht 45,45 %
19 EO 2C W = -110 9 40.91
20 EO 3P S-1 -100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A.6 Stan Tabor -Marie J. de Wagheneire 42,46 %
23 EO 4CcN-4 -1100 22 100.00
24 EO 4C W-1 50 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A14 Muriel de Ceuninck -Marina De Longree 35,64 %
27 EO 4P E = -420 16 72.73
28 EO 2T W+1 -110 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
Total : 235,1 / 528 = 44,53 %
PAIRE a.4 Jeannine Thys -Jacques Podevyn
A10 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 55,15 %
3 EO 1S S+2 150 0 0.00
4 EO 2K E+2 -130 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A.4 Yolande Waerseggers -Therese Dumont de Ch. 56,06 %
7 EO 1S S+1 120 7 31.82
8 EO 4C E-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
A12 Prisca Tondreau -Diane Deslignes 66,14 %
9 EO 3P N+2 200 4 18.18
10 EO 2T E-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
A.5 Marc Antoine de Halloy -Chantal de Locht 45,45 %
11 EO 3CcN-1 -100 17 77.27
12 EO 3S E-1 50 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 57,01 %
13 EO 3P W-1 100 6 27.27
14 EO 3T S+2 150 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.6 Stan Tabor -Marie J. de Wagheneire 42,46 %
15 EO 3S S = 600 12 54.55
16 EO 4T E = -130 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A14 Muriel de Ceuninck -Marina De Longree 35,64 %
17 EO 4K W = -130 5 22.73
18 EO 1S N-2 -200 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 57,05 %
19 EO 3KcS-2 -300 22 100.00
20 EO 3S S-1 -100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Grazia Neuenschwander 41,33 %
21 EO 4C E+2 -480 10 45.45
22 EO 4C S = 420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.8 Philippe van der Gracht -Mercedes Steed 44,19 %
23 EO 3S E+1 -630 14 63.64
24 EO 3P N-1 -50 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Martine Zens 41,69 %
25 EO 4C N = 420 11 50.00
26 EO 3C N+2 200 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.9 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten 50,55 %
27 EO 4P E-1 50 3 13.64
28 EO 3ScE+1 -650 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
Total : 235,0 / 528 = 44,51 %
PAIRE a11 Dominique Sassen -Francoise Duren
A13 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 57,01 %
1 EO 4C N = 420 11 50.00
2 EO 6C W-1 50 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 57,05 %
3 EO 2C S+1 140 3 13.64
4 EO 2S W+1 -150 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A14 Muriel de Ceuninck -Marina De Longree 35,64 %
5 EO 3S N = 600 22 100.00
6 EO 3S W-1 100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
A.8 Philippe van der Gracht -Mercedes Steed 44,19 %
7 EO 1S S = 90 16 72.73
8 EO 2C E+2 -170 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Grazia Neuenschwander 41,33 %
9 EO 3P N+1 170 9 40.91
10 EO 2P W+1 -140 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.9 Christian Martinot -Marguerite Verstraeten 50,55 %
11 EO 4K E-1 50 6 27.27
12 EO 2P S = 110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Martine Zens 41,69 %
13 EO 2P W = -110 18 81.82
14 EO 2P E-3 150 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 49,34 %
17 EO 4K W = -130 5 22.73
18 EO 2C S = 110 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
A11 Patrick Gilles -Marianne Falla 57,99 %
21 EO 5C E+1 -480 10 45.45
22 EO 3S S+2 460 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.5 Marc Antoine de Halloy -Chantal de Locht 45,45 %
23 EO 3S E+1 -630 14 63.64
24 EO 3C W = -140 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A12 Prisca Tondreau -Diane Deslignes 66,14 %
25 EO 4C N = 420 11 50.00
26 EO 4C N = 620 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.6 Stan Tabor -Marie J. de Wagheneire 42,46 %
27 EO 4P E-1 50 3 13.64
28 EO 2T W+2 -130 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
Total : 226,8 / 528 = 42,95 %
PAIRE a10 Chantal Barro -Isabelle de Vanssay
A.6 Stan Tabor -Marie J. de Wagheneire 42,46 %
1 EO 4C N = 420 11 50.00
2 EO 6C W = -980 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Daniel Kuczynski 57,01 %
3 EO 2C S = 110 11 50.00
4 EO 2C N+1 140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 57,05 %
5 EO 3S N+2 660 3 13.64
6 EO 3S W-1 100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 26,82 %
A14 Muriel de Ceuninck -Marina De Longree 35,64 %
7 EO 2S S = 120 7 31.82
8 EO 4C E = -420 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.8 Philippe van der Gracht -Mercedes Steed 44,19 %
9 EO 3P N+1 170 9 40.91
10 EO 2P W+2 -170 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Grazia Neuenschwander 41,33 %
11 EO 3C N-1 -50 10 45.45
12 EO 3T E+1 -130 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Martine Zens 41,69 %
15 EO 3S N = 600 12 54.55
16 EO 3T E = -110 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A10 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 55,15 %
19 EO 3T W+1 -130 13 59.09
20 EO 2P S = 110 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.4 Yolande Waerseggers -Therese Dumont de Ch. 56,06 %
21 EO 4C E+2 -480 10 45.45
22 EO 3S N+1 430 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A11 Patrick Gilles -Marianne Falla 57,99 %
23 EO 5KcW-3 800 0 0.00
24 EO 3P N = 140 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 4,55 %
A.5 Marc Antoine de Halloy -Chantal de Locht 45,45 %
25 EO 3S S+1 430 0 0.00
26 EO 3C N+2 200 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A12 Prisca Tondreau -Diane Deslignes 66,14 %
27 EO 3P E = -140 7 31.82
28 EO 2T W+1 -110 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
Total : 217,8 / 528 = 41,25 %
|