B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 61,72 N12 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Prisca Tondreau
--- 2 60,83 N.6 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory
--- 3 59,47 N.9 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza
--- 4 55,85 N14 Bruno Chevalier -Claude Renier
--- 5 55,66 N.2 Grazia Neuenschwander -Philippe van der Gracht
--- 6 53,18 N.3 Michele Berrier -Christiane Huby
--- 7 52,48 N13 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten
--- 8 52,08 N10 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens
--- 9 48,30 N11 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe
--- 10 48,09 N15 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn
--- 11 47,33 N.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor
--- 12 45,42 N.7 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie
--- 13 42,14 N.5 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Sophie Tilemans
--- 14 36,99 N.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Christiane Vroninckx
--- 15 30,85 N.8 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 59,41 e.9 Helene Schyns -Antoinette Jourdain
--- 2 57,59 e.7 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige
--- 3 56,06 e12 Anne France Raquez -Nicolas de Neve
--- 4 55,68 e14 Patrick Gilles -Noelle Fosse
--- 5 55,66 e.3 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren
--- 6 55,32 e.5 Helene Christiaens -Gerard Cooreman
--- 7 49,85 e.4 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
--- 8 49,26 e15 Dominique Sassen -Christian Neve
--- 9 49,05 e10 Catherine de Moffarts -Philippe Vilain XIIII
--- 10 47,37 e.1 Lydia Wildiers -Marianne Falla
--- 11 47,01 e.6 Olivier Paternostre -Diane Emsens
--- 12 42,82 e11 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger
--- 13 42,33 e.2 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens
--- 14 42,06 e.8 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot
--- 15 40,95 e13 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger
PAIRE N12 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Prisca Tondreau
e.8 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 42,06 %
1 NS 4K E = -130 16 72.73
2 NS 4C E+1 -450 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
e.7 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 57,59 %
3 NS 2P S = 110 9 40.91
4 NS 1S E = -90 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
e.6 Olivier Paternostre -Diane Emsens 47,01 %
5 NS 3P E+2 -200 10 45.45
6 NS 3S S+3 490 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
e.5 Helene Christiaens -Gerard Cooreman 55,32 %
7 NS 4C E+1 -650 15 68.18
8 NS 4C S-1 -50 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
e.4 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 49,85 %
9 NS 3S E-2 200 21 95.45
10 NS 4C S+1 650 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
e.3 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren 55,66 %
11 NS 3S S+1 430 19 86.36
12 NS 3P W-1 50 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
e.2 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens 42,33 %
13 NS 1S N = 90 17 77.27
14 NS 4K S-1 -50 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
e.1 Lydia Wildiers -Marianne Falla 47,37 %
15 NS 4K S = 130 21 95.45
16 NS 3P E+1 -170 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 70,23 %
e12 Anne France Raquez -Nicolas de Neve 56,06 %
23 NS 4P S = 620 16 72.73
24 NS 4P W+2 -480 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
e11 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 42,82 %
25 NS 5P E-1 100 22 100.00
26 NS 3S S+2 660 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 100,00 %
e10 Catherine de Moffarts -Philippe Vilain XIIII 49,05 %
27 NS 3T S+2 150 12 54.55
28 NS 1S E-1 50 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
e.9 Helene Schyns -Antoinette Jourdain 59,41 %
29 NS 4C N-2 -200 0 0.00
30 NS 2P E = -110 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
Total : 325,9 / 528 = 61,72 %
PAIRE N.6 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory
e11 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 42,82 %
1 NS 3K E+1 -130 16 72.73
2 NS 4C E-1 50 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
e10 Catherine de Moffarts -Philippe Vilain XIIII 49,05 %
3 NS 2P S+1 140 18 81.82
4 NS 1S E = -90 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
e.6 Olivier Paternostre -Diane Emsens 47,01 %
11 NS 3S S+1 430 19 86.36
12 NS 4CcN-1 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
e.5 Helene Christiaens -Gerard Cooreman 55,32 %
13 NS 2P E = -110 8 36.36
14 NS 4T W-1 50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
e.4 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 49,85 %
15 NS 3C W-1 50 11 50.00
16 NS 60%60% Ajust 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
e.3 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren 55,66 %
17 NS 4C S = 420 13 59.09
18 NS 2P N = 110 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
e.2 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens 42,33 %
19 NS 2P W-2 200 14 63.64
20 NS 3T W-1 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
e.1 Lydia Wildiers -Marianne Falla 47,37 %
21 NS 4T E+2 -170 20 90.91
22 NS 5C W+2 -710 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
e15 Dominique Sassen -Christian Neve 49,26 %
23 NS 4P S+1 650 22 100.00
24 NS 4P W = -420 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 97,73 %
e14 Patrick Gilles -Noelle Fosse 55,68 %
25 NS 4P E+1 -650 7 31.82
26 NS 4C N+1 650 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
e13 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 40,95 %
27 NS 3S N = 400 18 81.82
28 NS 1S E+1 -120 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
e12 Anne France Raquez -Nicolas de Neve 56,06 %
29 NS 3S S+1 630 20 90.91
30 NS 4P E = -420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
Total : 321,2 / 528 = 60,83 %
PAIRE N.9 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza
e.2 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens 42,33 %
1 NS 4C W+1 -450 3 13.64
2 NS 4C E-1 50 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
e.1 Lydia Wildiers -Marianne Falla 47,37 %
3 NS 2P S = 110 9 40.91
4 NS 1S E = -90 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
e15 Dominique Sassen -Christian Neve 49,26 %
5 NS 2P E+3 -200 10 45.45
6 NS 4P S+2 480 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
e14 Patrick Gilles -Noelle Fosse 55,68 %
7 NS 4C E+2 -680 9 40.91
8 NS 5S S = 460 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
e13 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 40,95 %
9 NS 2S W-1 100 14 63.64
10 NS 4C S = 620 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
e.9 Helene Schyns -Antoinette Jourdain 59,41 %
17 NS 4C S = 420 13 59.09
18 NS 2P N = 110 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
e.8 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 42,06 %
19 NS 3S W-4 400 18 81.82
20 NS 4T W-2 200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
e.7 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 57,59 %
21 NS 5K E+2 -440 11 50.00
22 NS 6P N-1 -50 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
e.6 Olivier Paternostre -Diane Emsens 47,01 %
23 NS 3P S+1 170 3 13.64
24 NS 5P W+1 -480 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
e.5 Helene Christiaens -Gerard Cooreman 55,32 %
25 NS 4P E = -620 18 81.82
26 NS 4C N+1 650 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
e.4 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 49,85 %
27 NS 4T S+2 170 14 63.64
28 NS 2K W = -90 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
e.3 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren 55,66 %
29 NS 3S N = 600 11 50.00
30 NS 3P E = -140 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
Total : 314,0 / 528 = 59,47 %
PAIRE N14 Bruno Chevalier -Claude Renier
e12 Anne France Raquez -Nicolas de Neve 56,06 %
1 NS 4K E = -130 16 72.73
2 NS 4C E+2 -480 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
e11 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 42,82 %
3 NS 2P S+1 140 18 81.82
4 NS 3K E-2 200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
e10 Catherine de Moffarts -Philippe Vilain XIIII 49,05 %
5 NS 2P E+1 -140 20 90.91
6 NS 4P S+1 450 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
e.9 Helene Schyns -Antoinette Jourdain 59,41 %
7 NS 6C W = -1430 4 18.18
8 NS 4C S-1 -50 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
e.8 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 42,06 %
9 NS 2P W-1 100 14 63.64
10 NS 3S N = 600 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
e.7 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 57,59 %
11 NS 3S S = 400 9 40.91
12 NS 3S W-4 200 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
e.6 Olivier Paternostre -Diane Emsens 47,01 %
13 NS 1S N = 90 17 77.27
14 NS 3K S+1 130 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
e.5 Helene Christiaens -Gerard Cooreman 55,32 %
15 NS 3C W-1 50 11 50.00
16 NS 2C W+2 -170 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
e.4 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 49,85 %
17 NS 4C S = 420 13 59.09
18 NS 3T E-1 50 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
e.3 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren 55,66 %
19 NS 2C W-3 300 16 72.73
20 NS 3T W-1 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
e14 Patrick Gilles -Noelle Fosse 55,68 %
27 NS 3S N-1 -50 4 18.18
28 NS 1S E+1 -120 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
e13 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 40,95 %
29 NS 3S N = 600 11 50.00
30 NS 4PcE-2 300 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
Total : 294,9 / 528 = 55,85 %
PAIRE N.2 Grazia Neuenschwander -Philippe van der Gracht
e.2 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens 42,33 %
3 NS 2P S+1 140 18 81.82
4 NS 1S E = -90 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
e.1 Lydia Wildiers -Marianne Falla 47,37 %
5 NS 2P E+3 -200 10 45.45
6 NS 3K N+2 150 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
e15 Dominique Sassen -Christian Neve 49,26 %
7 NS 6C E = -1430 4 18.18
8 NS 4C S = 420 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
e14 Patrick Gilles -Noelle Fosse 55,68 %
9 NS 2S W+2 -180 2 9.09
10 NS 4C S+1 650 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
e13 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 40,95 %
11 NS 3S S+1 430 19 86.36
12 NS 5TcW-4 800 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 93,18 %
e12 Anne France Raquez -Nicolas de Neve 56,06 %
13 NS 3K S-2 -200 0 0.00
14 NS 4K S-1 -50 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
e11 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 42,82 %
15 NS 3C W-2 100 18 81.82
16 NS 3P W+1 -170 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 63,41 %
e10 Catherine de Moffarts -Philippe Vilain XIIII 49,05 %
17 NS 4C S = 420 13 59.09
18 NS 3P N = 140 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
e.9 Helene Schyns -Antoinette Jourdain 59,41 %
19 NS 3S W-5 500 21 95.45
20 NS 3C S = 140 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
e.8 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 42,06 %
21 NS 4T E+2 -170 20 90.91
22 NS 5P N-2 -100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
e.7 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 57,59 %
23 NS 3P S+1 170 3 13.64
24 NS 4P W+2 -480 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
e.6 Olivier Paternostre -Diane Emsens 47,01 %
25 NS 4P E+1 -650 7 31.82
26 NS 6CcN-1 -200 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
Total : 293,9 / 528 = 55,66 %
PAIRE N.3 Michele Berrier -Christiane Huby
e.3 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren 55,66 %
5 NS 3P E+2 -200 10 45.45
6 NS 4P N+2 480 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
e.2 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens 42,33 %
7 NS 4C E+2 -680 9 40.91
8 NS 3C S+1 170 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
e.1 Lydia Wildiers -Marianne Falla 47,37 %
9 NS 3S W-2 200 21 95.45
10 NS 5C S-1 -100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
e15 Dominique Sassen -Christian Neve 49,26 %
11 NS 3S S-1 -50 0 0.00
12 NS 3C S+1 170 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
e14 Patrick Gilles -Noelle Fosse 55,68 %
13 NS 2P E+1 -140 2 9.09
14 NS 4T E-1 50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
e13 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 40,95 %
15 NS 3C W-1 50 11 50.00
16 NS 3C W = -140 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
e12 Anne France Raquez -Nicolas de Neve 56,06 %
17 NS 4C S = 420 13 59.09
18 NS 1P N+2 140 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
e11 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 42,82 %
19 NS 3C W-1 100 11 50.00
20 NS 2T W = -90 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
e10 Catherine de Moffarts -Philippe Vilain XIIII 49,05 %
21 NS 5K W+2 -440 11 50.00
22 NS 4C W+3 -710 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
e.9 Helene Schyns -Antoinette Jourdain 59,41 %
23 NS 4P S = 620 16 72.73
24 NS 4P W+2 -480 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
e.8 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 42,06 %
25 NS 4P E = -620 18 81.82
26 NS 4C N+1 650 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
e.7 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 57,59 %
27 NS 3S N-1 -50 4 18.18
28 NS 1S E+1 -120 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
Total : 280,8 / 528 = 53,18 %
PAIRE N13 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten
e10 Catherine de Moffarts -Philippe Vilain XIIII 49,05 %
1 NS 3K E+1 -130 16 72.73
2 NS 4C E-1 50 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
e.9 Helene Schyns -Antoinette Jourdain 59,41 %
3 NS 2P S = 110 9 40.91
4 NS 1S E = -90 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
e.8 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 42,06 %
5 NS 3P E+2 -200 10 45.45
6 NS 5K N+1 420 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
e.7 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 57,59 %
7 NS 6C W = -1430 4 18.18
8 NS 3C S+1 170 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
e.6 Olivier Paternostre -Diane Emsens 47,01 %
9 NS 2S W+1 -150 4 18.18
10 NS 4C S = 620 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
e.5 Helene Christiaens -Gerard Cooreman 55,32 %
11 NS 3S S = 400 9 40.91
12 NS 2C S+2 170 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
e.4 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 49,85 %
13 NS 3P E-1 100 21 95.45
14 NS 3K S = 110 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 93,18 %
e.3 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren 55,66 %
15 NS 3C W = -140 0 0.00
16 NS 4P W = -620 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 0,23 %
e.2 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens 42,33 %
17 NS 4P N = 420 13 59.09
18 NS 3P N = 140 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
e13 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 40,95 %
25 NS 4P E = -620 18 81.82
26 NS 4C N = 620 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
e12 Anne France Raquez -Nicolas de Neve 56,06 %
27 NS 3S N+1 430 20 90.91
28 NS 1S E+1 -120 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
e11 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 42,82 %
29 NS 2S S+1 150 4 18.18
30 NS 4P E-2 100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
Total : 277,1 / 528 = 52,48 %
PAIRE N10 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens
e.4 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 49,85 %
1 NS 5TcS-3 -500 0 0.00
2 NS 4C E+2 -480 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 4,55 %
e.3 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren 55,66 %
3 NS 3C W = -140 0 0.00
4 NS 1S E = -90 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
e.2 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens 42,33 %
5 NS 3K N-1 -100 22 100.00
6 NS 4P S = 420 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
e.1 Lydia Wildiers -Marianne Falla 47,37 %
7 NS 4C E+1 -650 15 68.18
8 NS 3C S+1 170 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
e15 Dominique Sassen -Christian Neve 49,26 %
9 NS 3S E-1 100 14 63.64
10 NS 4C S = 620 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
e14 Patrick Gilles -Noelle Fosse 55,68 %
11 NS 3S S+1 430 19 86.36
12 NS 4C S-1 -100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
e10 Catherine de Moffarts -Philippe Vilain XIIII 49,05 %
19 NS 2C W-1 100 11 50.00
20 NS 3C S = 140 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
e.9 Helene Schyns -Antoinette Jourdain 59,41 %
21 NS 5K W+2 -440 11 50.00
22 NS 6C W+1 -1460 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
e.8 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 42,06 %
23 NS 4P S = 620 16 72.73
24 NS 4P W+2 -480 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
e.7 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 57,59 %
25 NS 5P E = -650 7 31.82
26 NS 4C N+1 650 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
e.6 Olivier Paternostre -Diane Emsens 47,01 %
27 NS 5T N+2 440 22 100.00
28 NS 2K W = -90 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
e.5 Helene Christiaens -Gerard Cooreman 55,32 %
29 NS 3S S = 600 11 50.00
30 NS 4P E-1 50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
Total : 275,0 / 528 = 52,08 %
PAIRE N11 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe
e.6 Olivier Paternostre -Diane Emsens 47,01 %
1 NS 4C W+1 -450 3 13.64
2 NS 4C E = -420 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
e.5 Helene Christiaens -Gerard Cooreman 55,32 %
3 NS 2P S = 110 9 40.91
4 NS 1S E = -90 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
e.4 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 49,85 %
5 NS 4P E+1 -450 1 4.55
6 NS 5KcN = 550 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
e.3 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren 55,66 %
7 NS 3C E+2 -200 20 90.91
8 NS 3C S = 140 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
e.2 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens 42,33 %
9 NS 2P W = -110 8 36.36
10 NS 3P N = 140 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
e.1 Lydia Wildiers -Marianne Falla 47,37 %
11 NS 3S S = 400 9 40.91
12 NS 3CcS = 730 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
e15 Dominique Sassen -Christian Neve 49,26 %
13 NS 2P E = -110 8 36.36
14 NS 5T E-2 100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
e11 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 42,82 %
21 NS 5CcS-4 -1100 0 0.00
22 NS 4C W+3 -710 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
e10 Catherine de Moffarts -Philippe Vilain XIIII 49,05 %
23 NS 3P S+3 230 9 40.91
24 NS 5P W+1 -480 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
e.9 Helene Schyns -Antoinette Jourdain 59,41 %
25 NS 4P E+1 -650 7 31.82
26 NS 4C N+1 650 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
e.8 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 42,06 %
27 NS 3S N-1 -50 4 18.18
28 NS 2T S-1 -100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
e.7 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 57,59 %
29 NS 3S N = 600 11 50.00
30 NS 4P E-1 50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
Total : 255,0 / 528 = 48,30 %
PAIRE N15 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn
e14 Patrick Gilles -Noelle Fosse 55,68 %
1 NS 4TcS-2 -300 6 27.27
2 NS 4C E+2 -480 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
e13 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 40,95 %
3 NS 2P S+1 140 18 81.82
4 NS 1S E = -90 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
e12 Anne France Raquez -Nicolas de Neve 56,06 %
5 NS 3T W+2 -150 18 81.82
6 NS 4P S+2 480 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
e11 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 42,82 %
7 NS 4C E+1 -650 15 68.18
8 NS 4C S-1 -50 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
e10 Catherine de Moffarts -Philippe Vilain XIIII 49,05 %
9 NS 2P W+1 -140 6 27.27
10 NS 6C S-2 -200 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
e.9 Helene Schyns -Antoinette Jourdain 59,41 %
11 NS 2S S = 120 2 9.09
12 NS 2K E+1 -110 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
e.8 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 42,06 %
13 NS 3K E-1 100 21 95.45
14 NS 4K S-1 -50 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
e.7 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 57,59 %
15 NS 3K S+1 130 21 95.45
16 NS 2P W+2 -170 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 70,23 %
e.6 Olivier Paternostre -Diane Emsens 47,01 %
17 NS 4C N = 420 13 59.09
18 NS 2P N+1 140 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
e.5 Helene Christiaens -Gerard Cooreman 55,32 %
19 NS 3T N-1 -50 5 22.73
20 NS 3T W-1 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
e.4 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 49,85 %
21 NS 6K W+1 -940 3 13.64
22 NS 6C W = -1430 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
e15 Dominique Sassen -Christian Neve 49,26 %
29 NS 3S N+1 630 20 90.91
30 NS 4PcE-1 100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
Total : 253,9 / 528 = 48,09 %
PAIRE N.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor
e.4 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 49,85 %
7 NS 6C E-1 100 22 100.00
8 NS 3C S+1 170 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
e.3 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren 55,66 %
9 NS 3S W = -600 0 0.00
10 NS 3S N+3 690 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
e.2 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens 42,33 %
11 NS 3S S = 400 9 40.91
12 NS 2C S+2 170 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
e.1 Lydia Wildiers -Marianne Falla 47,37 %
13 NS 2P E = -110 8 36.36
14 NS 3S S-2 -100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
e15 Dominique Sassen -Christian Neve 49,26 %
15 NS 3C W-1 50 11 50.00
16 NS 3P W+1 -170 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
e14 Patrick Gilles -Noelle Fosse 55,68 %
17 NS 4C S = 420 13 59.09
18 NS 2P N = 110 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
e13 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 40,95 %
19 NS 3T N-1 -50 5 22.73
20 NS 3C S = 140 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
e12 Anne France Raquez -Nicolas de Neve 56,06 %
21 NS 5K W+2 -440 11 50.00
22 NS 6C W = -1430 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
e11 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 42,82 %
23 NS 4P S = 620 16 72.73
24 NS 4P W+2 -480 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
e10 Catherine de Moffarts -Philippe Vilain XIIII 49,05 %
25 NS 4P E+1 -650 7 31.82
26 NS 6C N-1 -100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
e.9 Helene Schyns -Antoinette Jourdain 59,41 %
27 NS 3S N-1 -50 4 18.18
28 NS 1S E+1 -120 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
e.8 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 42,06 %
29 NS 3S S = 600 11 50.00
30 NS 4P E-2 100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
Total : 249,9 / 528 = 47,33 %
PAIRE N.7 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie
e13 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 40,95 %
1 NS 4T S-1 -50 22 100.00
2 NS 4C E = -420 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
e12 Anne France Raquez -Nicolas de Neve 56,06 %
3 NS 4C W-1 100 4 18.18
4 NS 1S E = -90 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
e11 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 42,82 %
5 NS 4P E+1 -450 1 4.55
6 NS 4P N+2 480 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
e.7 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 57,59 %
13 NS 2P E = -110 8 36.36
14 NS 4K S-1 -50 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
e.6 Olivier Paternostre -Diane Emsens 47,01 %
15 NS 2C W = -110 3 13.64
16 NS 2P W+1 -140 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 54,09 %
e.5 Helene Christiaens -Gerard Cooreman 55,32 %
17 NS 4C S-2 -100 0 0.00
18 NS 3P N-1 -100 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 2,27 %
e.4 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 49,85 %
19 NS 3S W-5 500 21 95.45
20 NS 3T W = -110 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
e.3 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren 55,66 %
21 NS 4K E+2 -170 20 90.91
22 NS 6C W = -1430 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
e.2 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens 42,33 %
23 NS 3P S+3 230 9 40.91
24 NS 4P W = -420 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
e.1 Lydia Wildiers -Marianne Falla 47,37 %
25 NS 4P E+1 -650 7 31.82
26 NS 6C N-2 -200 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
e15 Dominique Sassen -Christian Neve 49,26 %
27 NS 3S N-1 -50 4 18.18
28 NS 1S E+1 -120 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
e14 Patrick Gilles -Noelle Fosse 55,68 %
29 NS 3S S+1 630 20 90.91
30 NS 4P E-2 100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
Total : 239,8 / 528 = 45,42 %
PAIRE N.5 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Sophie Tilemans
e.9 Helene Schyns -Antoinette Jourdain 59,41 %
1 NS 3K E+1 -130 16 72.73
2 NS 4C E = -420 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
e.5 Helene Christiaens -Gerard Cooreman 55,32 %
9 NS 3S E-1 100 14 63.64
10 NS 5P N-2 -200 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
e.4 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 49,85 %
11 NS 3S S = 400 9 40.91
12 NS 4K E-2 100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
e.3 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren 55,66 %
13 NS 2P E = -110 8 36.36
14 NS 4K S-1 -50 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
e.2 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens 42,33 %
15 NS 3C W-1 50 11 50.00
16 NS 2S W+1 -150 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
e.1 Lydia Wildiers -Marianne Falla 47,37 %
17 NS 4C S+2 480 22 100.00
18 NS 1P N+2 140 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
e15 Dominique Sassen -Christian Neve 49,26 %
19 NS 3T N-2 -100 0 0.00
20 NS 3T W = -110 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 2,27 %
e14 Patrick Gilles -Noelle Fosse 55,68 %
21 NS 5K W+2 -440 11 50.00
22 NS 6C W+1 -1460 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
e13 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 40,95 %
23 NS 3P S+1 170 3 13.64
24 NS 4P W+2 -480 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
e12 Anne France Raquez -Nicolas de Neve 56,06 %
25 NS 4P E+1 -650 7 31.82
26 NS 4C N = 620 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
e11 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 42,82 %
27 NS 2S N = 120 10 45.45
28 NS 1S E = -90 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
e10 Catherine de Moffarts -Philippe Vilain XIIII 49,05 %
29 NS 3S N-1 -100 2 9.09
30 NS 3P E = -140 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
Total : 222,5 / 528 = 42,14 %
PAIRE N.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Christiane Vroninckx
e.1 Lydia Wildiers -Marianne Falla 47,37 %
1 NS 2K E+3 -150 9 40.91
2 NS 4C E+1 -450 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
e15 Dominique Sassen -Christian Neve 49,26 %
3 NS 2P S-1 -50 2 9.09
4 NS 1S E-1 100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
e14 Patrick Gilles -Noelle Fosse 55,68 %
5 NS 3P E+2 -200 10 45.45
6 NS 4P S-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
e13 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 40,95 %
7 NS 4C E+1 -650 15 68.18
8 NS 4CcS-2 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
e12 Anne France Raquez -Nicolas de Neve 56,06 %
9 NS 3S E-1 100 14 63.64
10 NS 4C S-1 -100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
e11 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 42,82 %
11 NS 3S S = 400 9 40.91
12 NS 3K E = -110 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
e10 Catherine de Moffarts -Philippe Vilain XIIII 49,05 %
13 NS 1S N-1 -100 14 63.64
14 NS 3P W = -140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
e.9 Helene Schyns -Antoinette Jourdain 59,41 %
15 NS 3C W-1 50 11 50.00
16 NS 6C N-4 -200 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
e.8 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 42,06 %
17 NS 2S S = 120 4 18.18
18 NS 2P N = 110 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
e.7 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 57,59 %
19 NS 3T N-1 -50 5 22.73
20 NS 3C S-1 -100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
e.6 Olivier Paternostre -Diane Emsens 47,01 %
21 NS 5K W+2 -440 11 50.00
22 NS 5C W+2 -710 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
e.5 Helene Christiaens -Gerard Cooreman 55,32 %
23 NS 4P S = 620 16 72.73
24 NS 4P W+2 -480 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
Total : 195,3 / 528 = 36,99 %
PAIRE N.8 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson
e15 Dominique Sassen -Christian Neve 49,26 %
1 NS 4K E+1 -150 9 40.91
2 NS 4C E+1 -450 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
e14 Patrick Gilles -Noelle Fosse 55,68 %
3 NS 2P S+1 140 18 81.82
4 NS 1S E+1 -120 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
e13 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger 40,95 %
5 NS 3P E+2 -200 10 45.45
6 NS 3K N+2 150 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
e12 Anne France Raquez -Nicolas de Neve 56,06 %
7 NS 6S E = -1440 0 0.00
8 NS 3S S-1 -50 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
e.8 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 42,06 %
15 NS 2C W = -110 3 13.64
16 NS 2P W+2 -170 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 29,32 %
e.7 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 57,59 %
17 NS 3S S-1 -50 2 9.09
18 NS 2P N-1 -100 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 6,82 %
e.6 Olivier Paternostre -Diane Emsens 47,01 %
19 NS 3T N-1 -50 5 22.73
20 NS 3T W-1 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
e.5 Helene Christiaens -Gerard Cooreman 55,32 %
21 NS 6K W+1 -940 3 13.64
22 NS 4C W+3 -710 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
e.4 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 49,85 %
23 NS 3P S+1 170 3 13.64
24 NS 6P W = -980 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 6,82 %
e.3 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren 55,66 %
25 NS 4P E+1 -650 7 31.82
26 NS 4C N = 620 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
e.2 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens 42,33 %
27 NS 3T N+4 190 16 72.73
28 NS 1S E+1 -120 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
e.1 Lydia Wildiers -Marianne Falla 47,37 %
29 NS 3S N = 600 11 50.00
30 NS 4P E-1 50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
Total : 162,9 / 528 = 30,85 %
PAIRE e.9 Helene Schyns -Antoinette Jourdain
N.5 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Sophie Tilemans 42,14 %
1 EO 3K E+1 -130 6 27.27
2 EO 4C E = -420 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
N13 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 52,48 %
3 EO 2P S = 110 13 59.09
4 EO 1S E = -90 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
N14 Bruno Chevalier -Claude Renier 55,85 %
7 EO 6C W = -1430 18 81.82
8 EO 4C S-1 -50 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
N15 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn 48,09 %
11 EO 2S S = 120 20 90.91
12 EO 2K E+1 -110 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
N.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Christiane Vroninckx 36,99 %
15 EO 3C W-1 50 11 50.00
16 EO 6C N-4 -200 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
N.9 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 59,47 %
17 EO 4C S = 420 9 40.91
18 EO 2P N = 110 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
N.2 Grazia Neuenschwander -Philippe van der Gracht 55,66 %
19 EO 3S W-5 500 1 4.55
20 EO 3C S = 140 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
N10 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 52,08 %
21 EO 5K W+2 -440 11 50.00
22 EO 6C W+1 -1460 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
N.3 Michele Berrier -Christiane Huby 53,18 %
23 EO 4P S = 620 6 27.27
24 EO 4P W+2 -480 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
N11 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 48,30 %
25 EO 4P E+1 -650 15 68.18
26 EO 4C N+1 650 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
N.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 47,33 %
27 EO 3S N-1 -50 18 81.82
28 EO 1S E+1 -120 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
N12 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Prisca Tondreau 61,72 %
29 EO 4C N-2 -200 22 100.00
30 EO 2P E = -110 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
Total : 313,7 / 528 = 59,41 %
PAIRE e.7 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige
N12 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Prisca Tondreau 61,72 %
3 EO 2P S = 110 13 59.09
4 EO 1S E = -90 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
N13 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 52,48 %
7 EO 6C W = -1430 18 81.82
8 EO 3C S+1 170 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
N14 Bruno Chevalier -Claude Renier 55,85 %
11 EO 3S S = 400 13 59.09
12 EO 3S W-4 200 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
N.7 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 45,42 %
13 EO 2P E = -110 14 63.64
14 EO 4K S-1 -50 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
N15 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn 48,09 %
15 EO 3K S+1 130 1 4.55
16 EO 2P W+2 -170 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 29,77 %
N.8 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 30,85 %
17 EO 3S S-1 -50 20 90.91
18 EO 2P N-1 -100 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 93,18 %
N.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Christiane Vroninckx 36,99 %
19 EO 3T N-1 -50 17 77.27
20 EO 3C S-1 -100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
N.9 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 59,47 %
21 EO 5K E+2 -440 11 50.00
22 EO 6P N-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
N.2 Grazia Neuenschwander -Philippe van der Gracht 55,66 %
23 EO 3P S+1 170 19 86.36
24 EO 4P W+2 -480 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
N10 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 52,08 %
25 EO 5P E = -650 15 68.18
26 EO 4C N+1 650 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
N.3 Michele Berrier -Christiane Huby 53,18 %
27 EO 3S N-1 -50 18 81.82
28 EO 1S E+1 -120 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
N11 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 48,30 %
29 EO 3S N = 600 11 50.00
30 EO 4P E-1 50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
Total : 304,1 / 528 = 57,59 %
PAIRE e12 Anne France Raquez -Nicolas de Neve
N14 Bruno Chevalier -Claude Renier 55,85 %
1 EO 4K E = -130 6 27.27
2 EO 4C E+2 -480 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
N.7 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 45,42 %
3 EO 4C W-1 100 18 81.82
4 EO 1S E = -90 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
N15 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn 48,09 %
5 EO 3T W+2 -150 4 18.18
6 EO 4P S+2 480 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
N.8 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 30,85 %
7 EO 6S E = -1440 22 100.00
8 EO 3S S-1 -50 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
N.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Christiane Vroninckx 36,99 %
9 EO 3S E-1 100 8 36.36
10 EO 4C S-1 -100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
N.2 Grazia Neuenschwander -Philippe van der Gracht 55,66 %
13 EO 3K S-2 -200 22 100.00
14 EO 4K S-1 -50 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
N.3 Michele Berrier -Christiane Huby 53,18 %
17 EO 4C S = 420 9 40.91
18 EO 1P N+2 140 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
N.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 47,33 %
21 EO 5K W+2 -440 11 50.00
22 EO 6C W = -1430 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
N12 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Prisca Tondreau 61,72 %
23 EO 4P S = 620 6 27.27
24 EO 4P W+2 -480 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
N.5 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Sophie Tilemans 42,14 %
25 EO 4P E+1 -650 15 68.18
26 EO 4C N = 620 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
N13 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 52,48 %
27 EO 3S N+1 430 2 9.09
28 EO 1S E+1 -120 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
N.6 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 60,83 %
29 EO 3S S+1 630 2 9.09
30 EO 4P E = -420 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
Total : 296,0 / 528 = 56,06 %
PAIRE e14 Patrick Gilles -Noelle Fosse
N15 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn 48,09 %
1 EO 4TcS-2 -300 16 72.73
2 EO 4C E+2 -480 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
N.8 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 30,85 %
3 EO 2P S+1 140 4 18.18
4 EO 1S E+1 -120 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
N.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Christiane Vroninckx 36,99 %
5 EO 3P E+2 -200 12 54.55
6 EO 4P S-1 -50 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
N.9 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 59,47 %
7 EO 4C E+2 -680 13 59.09
8 EO 5S S = 460 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
N.2 Grazia Neuenschwander -Philippe van der Gracht 55,66 %
9 EO 2S W+2 -180 20 90.91
10 EO 4C S+1 650 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
N10 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 52,08 %
11 EO 3S S+1 430 3 13.64
12 EO 4C S-1 -100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
N.3 Michele Berrier -Christiane Huby 53,18 %
13 EO 2P E+1 -140 20 90.91
14 EO 4T E-1 50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
N.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 47,33 %
17 EO 4C S = 420 9 40.91
18 EO 2P N = 110 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
N.5 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Sophie Tilemans 42,14 %
21 EO 5K W+2 -440 11 50.00
22 EO 6C W+1 -1460 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
N.6 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 60,83 %
25 EO 4P E+1 -650 15 68.18
26 EO 4C N+1 650 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
N14 Bruno Chevalier -Claude Renier 55,85 %
27 EO 3S N-1 -50 18 81.82
28 EO 1S E+1 -120 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
N.7 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 45,42 %
29 EO 3S S+1 630 2 9.09
30 EO 4P E-2 100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
Total : 294,0 / 528 = 55,68 %
PAIRE e.3 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren
N10 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 52,08 %
3 EO 3C W = -140 22 100.00
4 EO 1S E = -90 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
N.3 Michele Berrier -Christiane Huby 53,18 %
5 EO 3P E+2 -200 12 54.55
6 EO 4P N+2 480 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
N11 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 48,30 %
7 EO 3C E+2 -200 2 9.09
8 EO 3C S = 140 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
N.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 47,33 %
9 EO 3S W = -600 22 100.00
10 EO 3S N+3 690 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
N12 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Prisca Tondreau 61,72 %
11 EO 3S S+1 430 3 13.64
12 EO 3P W-1 50 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
N.5 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Sophie Tilemans 42,14 %
13 EO 2P E = -110 14 63.64
14 EO 4K S-1 -50 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
N13 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 52,48 %
15 EO 3C W = -140 22 100.00
16 EO 4P W = -620 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 99,77 %
N.6 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 60,83 %
17 EO 4C S = 420 9 40.91
18 EO 2P N = 110 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
N14 Bruno Chevalier -Claude Renier 55,85 %
19 EO 2C W-3 300 6 27.27
20 EO 3T W-1 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
N.7 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 45,42 %
21 EO 4K E+2 -170 2 9.09
22 EO 6C W = -1430 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
N.8 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 30,85 %
25 EO 4P E+1 -650 15 68.18
26 EO 4C N = 620 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
N.9 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 59,47 %
29 EO 3S N = 600 11 50.00
30 EO 3P E = -140 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
Total : 293,9 / 528 = 55,66 %
PAIRE e.5 Helene Christiaens -Gerard Cooreman
N11 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 48,30 %
3 EO 2P S = 110 13 59.09
4 EO 1S E = -90 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
N12 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Prisca Tondreau 61,72 %
7 EO 4C E+1 -650 7 31.82
8 EO 4C S-1 -50 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
N.5 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Sophie Tilemans 42,14 %
9 EO 3S E-1 100 8 36.36
10 EO 5P N-2 -200 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
N13 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 52,48 %
11 EO 3S S = 400 13 59.09
12 EO 2C S+2 170 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
N.6 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 60,83 %
13 EO 2P E = -110 14 63.64
14 EO 4T W-1 50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
N14 Bruno Chevalier -Claude Renier 55,85 %
15 EO 3C W-1 50 11 50.00
16 EO 2C W+2 -170 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
N.7 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 45,42 %
17 EO 4C S-2 -100 22 100.00
18 EO 3P N-1 -100 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 97,73 %
N15 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn 48,09 %
19 EO 3T N-1 -50 17 77.27
20 EO 3T W-1 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
N.8 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 30,85 %
21 EO 6K W+1 -940 19 86.36
22 EO 4C W+3 -710 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
N.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Christiane Vroninckx 36,99 %
23 EO 4P S = 620 6 27.27
24 EO 4P W+2 -480 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
N.9 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 59,47 %
25 EO 4P E = -620 4 18.18
26 EO 4C N+1 650 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
N10 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 52,08 %
29 EO 3S S = 600 11 50.00
30 EO 4P E-1 50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
Total : 292,1 / 528 = 55,32 %
PAIRE e.4 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
N10 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 52,08 %
1 EO 5TcS-3 -500 22 100.00
2 EO 4C E+2 -480 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 95,45 %
N11 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 48,30 %
5 EO 4P E+1 -450 21 95.45
6 EO 5KcN = 550 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
N.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 47,33 %
7 EO 6C E-1 100 0 0.00
8 EO 3C S+1 170 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
N12 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Prisca Tondreau 61,72 %
9 EO 3S E-2 200 1 4.55
10 EO 4C S+1 650 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
N.5 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Sophie Tilemans 42,14 %
11 EO 3S S = 400 13 59.09
12 EO 4K E-2 100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
N13 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 52,48 %
13 EO 3P E-1 100 1 4.55
14 EO 3K S = 110 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 6,82 %
N.6 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 60,83 %
15 EO 3C W-1 50 11 50.00
16 EO 60%60% Ajust 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
N14 Bruno Chevalier -Claude Renier 55,85 %
17 EO 4C S = 420 9 40.91
18 EO 3T E-1 50 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
N.7 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 45,42 %
19 EO 3S W-5 500 1 4.55
20 EO 3T W = -110 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
N15 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn 48,09 %
21 EO 6K W+1 -940 19 86.36
22 EO 6C W = -1430 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
N.8 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 30,85 %
23 EO 3P S+1 170 19 86.36
24 EO 6P W = -980 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 93,18 %
N.9 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 59,47 %
27 EO 4T S+2 170 8 36.36
28 EO 2K W = -90 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
Total : 263,2 / 528 = 49,85 %
PAIRE e15 Dominique Sassen -Christian Neve
N.8 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 30,85 %
1 EO 4K E+1 -150 13 59.09
2 EO 4C E+1 -450 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
N.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Christiane Vroninckx 36,99 %
3 EO 2P S-1 -50 20 90.91
4 EO 1S E-1 100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
N.9 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 59,47 %
5 EO 2P E+3 -200 12 54.55
6 EO 4P S+2 480 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
N.2 Grazia Neuenschwander -Philippe van der Gracht 55,66 %
7 EO 6C E = -1430 18 81.82
8 EO 4C S = 420 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
N10 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 52,08 %
9 EO 3S E-1 100 8 36.36
10 EO 4C S = 620 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
N.3 Michele Berrier -Christiane Huby 53,18 %
11 EO 3S S-1 -50 22 100.00
12 EO 3C S+1 170 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
N11 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 48,30 %
13 EO 2P E = -110 14 63.64
14 EO 5T E-2 100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
N.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 47,33 %
15 EO 3C W-1 50 11 50.00
16 EO 3P W+1 -170 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
N.5 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Sophie Tilemans 42,14 %
19 EO 3T N-2 -100 22 100.00
20 EO 3T W = -110 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 97,73 %
N.6 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 60,83 %
23 EO 4P S+1 650 0 0.00
24 EO 4P W = -420 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 2,27 %
N.7 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 45,42 %
27 EO 3S N-1 -50 18 81.82
28 EO 1S E+1 -120 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
N15 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn 48,09 %
29 EO 3S N+1 630 2 9.09
30 EO 4PcE-1 100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
Total : 260,1 / 528 = 49,26 %
PAIRE e10 Catherine de Moffarts -Philippe Vilain XIIII
N13 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 52,48 %
1 EO 3K E+1 -130 6 27.27
2 EO 4C E-1 50 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
N.6 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 60,83 %
3 EO 2P S+1 140 4 18.18
4 EO 1S E = -90 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
N14 Bruno Chevalier -Claude Renier 55,85 %
5 EO 2P E+1 -140 2 9.09
6 EO 4P S+1 450 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
N15 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn 48,09 %
9 EO 2P W+1 -140 16 72.73
10 EO 6C S-2 -200 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
N.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Christiane Vroninckx 36,99 %
13 EO 1S N-1 -100 8 36.36
14 EO 3P W = -140 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
N.2 Grazia Neuenschwander -Philippe van der Gracht 55,66 %
17 EO 4C S = 420 9 40.91
18 EO 3P N = 140 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
N10 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 52,08 %
19 EO 2C W-1 100 11 50.00
20 EO 3C S = 140 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
N.3 Michele Berrier -Christiane Huby 53,18 %
21 EO 5K W+2 -440 11 50.00
22 EO 4C W+3 -710 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
N11 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 48,30 %
23 EO 3P S+3 230 13 59.09
24 EO 5P W+1 -480 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
N.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 47,33 %
25 EO 4P E+1 -650 15 68.18
26 EO 6C N-1 -100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
N12 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Prisca Tondreau 61,72 %
27 EO 3T S+2 150 10 45.45
28 EO 1S E-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
N.5 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Sophie Tilemans 42,14 %
29 EO 3S N-1 -100 20 90.91
30 EO 3P E = -140 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
Total : 259,0 / 528 = 49,05 %
PAIRE e.1 Lydia Wildiers -Marianne Falla
N.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Christiane Vroninckx 36,99 %
1 EO 2K E+3 -150 13 59.09
2 EO 4C E+1 -450 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
N.9 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 59,47 %
3 EO 2P S = 110 13 59.09
4 EO 1S E = -90 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
N.2 Grazia Neuenschwander -Philippe van der Gracht 55,66 %
5 EO 2P E+3 -200 12 54.55
6 EO 3K N+2 150 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
N10 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 52,08 %
7 EO 4C E+1 -650 7 31.82
8 EO 3C S+1 170 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
N.3 Michele Berrier -Christiane Huby 53,18 %
9 EO 3S W-2 200 1 4.55
10 EO 5C S-1 -100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
N11 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 48,30 %
11 EO 3S S = 400 13 59.09
12 EO 3CcS = 730 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
N.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 47,33 %
13 EO 2P E = -110 14 63.64
14 EO 3S S-2 -100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
N12 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Prisca Tondreau 61,72 %
15 EO 4K S = 130 1 4.55
16 EO 3P E+1 -170 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 29,77 %
N.5 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Sophie Tilemans 42,14 %
17 EO 4C S+2 480 0 0.00
18 EO 1P N+2 140 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
N.6 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 60,83 %
21 EO 4T E+2 -170 2 9.09
22 EO 5C W+2 -710 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
N.7 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 45,42 %
25 EO 4P E+1 -650 15 68.18
26 EO 6C N-2 -200 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
N.8 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 30,85 %
29 EO 3S N = 600 11 50.00
30 EO 4P E-1 50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
Total : 250,1 / 528 = 47,37 %
PAIRE e.6 Olivier Paternostre -Diane Emsens
N11 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 48,30 %
1 EO 4C W+1 -450 19 86.36
2 EO 4C E = -420 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
N12 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Prisca Tondreau 61,72 %
5 EO 3P E+2 -200 12 54.55
6 EO 3S S+3 490 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
N13 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 52,48 %
9 EO 2S W+1 -150 18 81.82
10 EO 4C S = 620 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
N.6 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 60,83 %
11 EO 3S S+1 430 3 13.64
12 EO 4CcN-1 -200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
N14 Bruno Chevalier -Claude Renier 55,85 %
13 EO 1S N = 90 5 22.73
14 EO 3K S+1 130 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
N.7 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 45,42 %
15 EO 2C W = -110 19 86.36
16 EO 2P W+1 -140 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 45,91 %
N15 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn 48,09 %
17 EO 4C N = 420 9 40.91
18 EO 2P N+1 140 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
N.8 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 30,85 %
19 EO 3T N-1 -50 17 77.27
20 EO 3T W-1 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
N.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Christiane Vroninckx 36,99 %
21 EO 5K W+2 -440 11 50.00
22 EO 5C W+2 -710 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
N.9 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 59,47 %
23 EO 3P S+1 170 19 86.36
24 EO 5P W+1 -480 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
N.2 Grazia Neuenschwander -Philippe van der Gracht 55,66 %
25 EO 4P E+1 -650 15 68.18
26 EO 6CcN-1 -200 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
N10 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 52,08 %
27 EO 5T N+2 440 0 0.00
28 EO 2K W = -90 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
Total : 248,2 / 528 = 47,01 %
PAIRE e11 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger
N.6 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 60,83 %
1 EO 3K E+1 -130 6 27.27
2 EO 4C E-1 50 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
N14 Bruno Chevalier -Claude Renier 55,85 %
3 EO 2P S+1 140 4 18.18
4 EO 3K E-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
N.7 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 45,42 %
5 EO 4P E+1 -450 21 95.45
6 EO 4P N+2 480 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
N15 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn 48,09 %
7 EO 4C E+1 -650 7 31.82
8 EO 4C S-1 -50 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
N.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Christiane Vroninckx 36,99 %
11 EO 3S S = 400 13 59.09
12 EO 3K E = -110 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
N.2 Grazia Neuenschwander -Philippe van der Gracht 55,66 %
15 EO 3C W-2 100 4 18.18
16 EO 3P W+1 -170 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 36,59 %
N.3 Michele Berrier -Christiane Huby 53,18 %
19 EO 3C W-1 100 11 50.00
20 EO 2T W = -90 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
N11 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 48,30 %
21 EO 5CcS-4 -1100 22 100.00
22 EO 4C W+3 -710 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
N.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 47,33 %
23 EO 4P S = 620 6 27.27
24 EO 4P W+2 -480 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
N12 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Prisca Tondreau 61,72 %
25 EO 5P E-1 100 0 0.00
26 EO 3S S+2 660 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
N.5 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Sophie Tilemans 42,14 %
27 EO 2S N = 120 12 54.55
28 EO 1S E = -90 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
N13 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 52,48 %
29 EO 2S S+1 150 18 81.82
30 EO 4P E-2 100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
Total : 226,1 / 528 = 42,82 %
PAIRE e.2 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens
N.9 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 59,47 %
1 EO 4C W+1 -450 19 86.36
2 EO 4C E-1 50 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
N.2 Grazia Neuenschwander -Philippe van der Gracht 55,66 %
3 EO 2P S+1 140 4 18.18
4 EO 1S E = -90 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
N10 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 52,08 %
5 EO 3K N-1 -100 0 0.00
6 EO 4P S = 420 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
N.3 Michele Berrier -Christiane Huby 53,18 %
7 EO 4C E+2 -680 13 59.09
8 EO 3C S+1 170 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
N11 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 48,30 %
9 EO 2P W = -110 14 63.64
10 EO 3P N = 140 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
N.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 47,33 %
11 EO 3S S = 400 13 59.09
12 EO 2C S+2 170 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
N12 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Prisca Tondreau 61,72 %
13 EO 1S N = 90 5 22.73
14 EO 4K S-1 -50 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
N.5 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Sophie Tilemans 42,14 %
15 EO 3C W-1 50 11 50.00
16 EO 2S W+1 -150 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
N13 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 52,48 %
17 EO 4P N = 420 9 40.91
18 EO 3P N = 140 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
N.6 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 60,83 %
19 EO 2P W-2 200 8 36.36
20 EO 3T W-1 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
N.7 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 45,42 %
23 EO 3P S+3 230 13 59.09
24 EO 4P W = -420 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
N.8 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 30,85 %
27 EO 3T N+4 190 6 27.27
28 EO 1S E+1 -120 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 223,5 / 528 = 42,33 %
PAIRE e.8 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot
N12 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Prisca Tondreau 61,72 %
1 EO 4K E = -130 6 27.27
2 EO 4C E+1 -450 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
N13 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 52,48 %
5 EO 3P E+2 -200 12 54.55
6 EO 5K N+1 420 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
N14 Bruno Chevalier -Claude Renier 55,85 %
9 EO 2P W-1 100 8 36.36
10 EO 3S N = 600 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
N15 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn 48,09 %
13 EO 3K E-1 100 1 4.55
14 EO 4K S-1 -50 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
N.8 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 30,85 %
15 EO 2C W = -110 19 86.36
16 EO 2P W+2 -170 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 70,68 %
N.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Christiane Vroninckx 36,99 %
17 EO 2S S = 120 18 81.82
18 EO 2P N = 110 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
N.9 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 59,47 %
19 EO 3S W-4 400 4 18.18
20 EO 4T W-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
N.2 Grazia Neuenschwander -Philippe van der Gracht 55,66 %
21 EO 4T E+2 -170 2 9.09
22 EO 5P N-2 -100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
N10 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 52,08 %
23 EO 4P S = 620 6 27.27
24 EO 4P W+2 -480 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
N.3 Michele Berrier -Christiane Huby 53,18 %
25 EO 4P E = -620 4 18.18
26 EO 4C N+1 650 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
N11 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 48,30 %
27 EO 3S N-1 -50 18 81.82
28 EO 2T S-1 -100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
N.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 47,33 %
29 EO 3S S = 600 11 50.00
30 EO 4P E-2 100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
Total : 222,1 / 528 = 42,06 %
PAIRE e13 Mado Miller -Helene Lemberger
N.7 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 45,42 %
1 EO 4T S-1 -50 0 0.00
2 EO 4C E = -420 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
N15 Francine Belet -Jacques Podevyn 48,09 %
3 EO 2P S+1 140 4 18.18
4 EO 1S E = -90 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
N.8 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 30,85 %
5 EO 3P E+2 -200 12 54.55
6 EO 3K N+2 150 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
N.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Christiane Vroninckx 36,99 %
7 EO 4C E+1 -650 7 31.82
8 EO 4CcS-2 -300 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
N.9 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 59,47 %
9 EO 2S W-1 100 8 36.36
10 EO 4C S = 620 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
N.2 Grazia Neuenschwander -Philippe van der Gracht 55,66 %
11 EO 3S S+1 430 3 13.64
12 EO 5TcW-4 800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 6,82 %
N.3 Michele Berrier -Christiane Huby 53,18 %
15 EO 3C W-1 50 11 50.00
16 EO 3C W = -140 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
N.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 47,33 %
19 EO 3T N-1 -50 17 77.27
20 EO 3C S = 140 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
N.5 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Sophie Tilemans 42,14 %
23 EO 3P S+1 170 19 86.36
24 EO 4P W+2 -480 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
N13 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 52,48 %
25 EO 4P E = -620 4 18.18
26 EO 4C N = 620 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
N.6 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 60,83 %
27 EO 3S N = 400 4 18.18
28 EO 1S E+1 -120 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
N14 Bruno Chevalier -Claude Renier 55,85 %
29 EO 3S N = 600 11 50.00
30 EO 4PcE-2 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
Total : 216,2 / 528 = 40,95 %
|