B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 56,44 N.2 Grazia Neuenschwander -Gerard Cooreman
--- 2 56,25 N.1 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen
--- 3 55,68 N.7 Pascale Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee
--- 4 55,30 N.5 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory
--- 5 52,84 N11 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Sylviane Delbeke
--- 6 51,70 N.9 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes
--- 7 50,76 N12 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe
--- 8 48,11 N.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor
--- 9 47,16 N.8 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson
--- 10 45,83 N10 Alexandre Viot -Philippe van der Gracht
--- 11 45,64 N.6 Gaetan van de Werve -Diane Emsens
--- 12 45,08 N.3 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren
--- 13 39,20 N13 Eliane de Ceuninck -Simone Munsterhjelm
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 58,52 e.2 Helene Christiaens -Teresa Dekoster
--- 2 55,68 e10 Marianne Falla -Noelle Fosse
--- 3 53,98 e.7 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles
--- 4 53,79 e.6 Anne France Raquez -Laurence del Marmol
--- 5 52,65 e13 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker
--- 6 50,95 e12 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw
--- 7 50,95 e.1 Catherine de Moffarts -Marie Morimont
--- 8 49,62 e.9 Martine Buisseret -Bernard Buisseret
--- 9 48,86 e.5 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys
--- 10 46,78 e.4 Nicolas de Neve -Olivier Paternostre
--- 11 46,02 e.3 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Aliona Pascaru
--- 12 43,56 e.8 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens
--- 13 38,64 e11 Annick Peeters -Neslihan Buharali
PAIRE N.2 Grazia Neuenschwander -Gerard Cooreman
e.2 Helene Christiaens -Teresa Dekoster 58,52 %
3 NS 4C N = 420 7 31.82
4 NS 4P W-2 200 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
e.1 Catherine de Moffarts -Marie Morimont 50,95 %
5 NS 3P W+1 -170 15 68.18
6 NS 4P S = 420 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
e13 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 52,65 %
7 NS 2P S-1 -100 19 86.36
8 NS 3P W+1 -170 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
e12 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 50,95 %
9 NS 3S N-2 -100 3 13.64
10 NS 3C W-1 100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
e11 Annick Peeters -Neslihan Buharali 38,64 %
11 NS 3KcE = -470 0 0.00
12 NS 4P S+1 650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
e10 Marianne Falla -Noelle Fosse 55,68 %
13 NS 3S N-1 -100 14 63.64
14 NS 4C S-2 -100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
e.9 Martine Buisseret -Bernard Buisseret 49,62 %
15 NS 2S N = 120 22 100.00
16 NS 3S E+1 -630 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
e.8 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens 43,56 %
17 NS 5C S = 450 13 59.09
18 NS 6P E-1 50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
e.7 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 53,98 %
19 NS 4P N+3 510 21 95.45
20 NS 4P E+1 -650 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
e.6 Anne France Raquez -Laurence del Marmol 53,79 %
21 NS 2P E = -110 9 40.91
22 NS 5T E-1 100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
e.5 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 48,86 %
23 NS 1C W+2 -140 9 40.91
24 NS 3C N = 140 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
e.4 Nicolas de Neve -Olivier Paternostre 46,78 %
25 NS 3S S+1 430 11 50.00
26 NS 2P E = -110 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
Total : 298,0 / 528 = 56,44 %
PAIRE N.1 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen
e.1 Catherine de Moffarts -Marie Morimont 50,95 %
1 NS 4P S = 420 16 72.73
2 NS 3S E+2 -460 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
e13 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 52,65 %
3 NS 3S N-3 -150 0 0.00
4 NS 4P W-2 200 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
e12 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 50,95 %
5 NS 2P W+2 -170 15 68.18
6 NS 4P S = 420 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
e11 Annick Peeters -Neslihan Buharali 38,64 %
7 NS 3C S-4 -400 9 40.91
8 NS 4P W-1 50 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
e10 Marianne Falla -Noelle Fosse 55,68 %
9 NS 4K S = 130 20 90.91
10 NS 4T E-1 100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
e.9 Martine Buisseret -Bernard Buisseret 49,62 %
11 NS 3C N = 140 22 100.00
12 NS 4P S+1 650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
e.8 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens 43,56 %
13 NS 3S N-2 -200 5 22.73
14 NS 2P E-3 150 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
e.7 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 53,98 %
15 NS 1S E-1 50 7 31.82
16 NS 3S E+2 -660 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
e.6 Anne France Raquez -Laurence del Marmol 53,79 %
17 NS 4C S+1 450 13 59.09
18 NS 6P E-2 100 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
e.5 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 48,86 %
19 NS 4P N+2 480 13 59.09
20 NS 4P E+1 -650 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
e.4 Nicolas de Neve -Olivier Paternostre 46,78 %
21 NS 1S W+3 -180 0 0.00
22 NS 5T E-1 100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
e.3 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Aliona Pascaru 46,02 %
23 NS 2C W+1 -140 9 40.91
24 NS 5T E-1 50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
Total : 297,0 / 528 = 56,25 %
PAIRE N.7 Pascale Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee
e13 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 52,65 %
1 NS 4P S-1 -50 6 27.27
2 NS 3S W = -400 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
e12 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 50,95 %
3 NS 4C N+1 450 15 68.18
4 NS 4P W-2 200 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
e11 Annick Peeters -Neslihan Buharali 38,64 %
5 NS 4K N = 130 20 90.91
6 NS 4P S = 420 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
e10 Marianne Falla -Noelle Fosse 55,68 %
7 NS 4P S-4 -400 9 40.91
8 NS 3P W+1 -170 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
e.9 Martine Buisseret -Bernard Buisseret 49,62 %
9 NS 3S S-2 -100 3 13.64
10 NS 1PcS = 160 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
e.7 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 53,98 %
13 NS 5T S-2 -200 5 22.73
14 NS 3S S+1 430 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
e.6 Anne France Raquez -Laurence del Marmol 53,79 %
15 NS 1S N = 90 14 63.64
16 NS 3S E+1 -630 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
e.5 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 48,86 %
17 NS 4C S+1 450 13 59.09
18 NS 4P E = -420 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
e.4 Nicolas de Neve -Olivier Paternostre 46,78 %
19 NS 3S N+3 490 17 77.27
20 NS 4P W+1 -650 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
e.3 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Aliona Pascaru 46,02 %
21 NS 4P E-2 100 21 95.45
22 NS 4T E = -130 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
e.2 Helene Christiaens -Teresa Dekoster 58,52 %
23 NS 4T N-2 -200 1 4.55
24 NS 4C N = 420 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
e.1 Catherine de Moffarts -Marie Morimont 50,95 %
25 NS 3S S+1 430 11 50.00
26 NS 3P E = -140 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
Total : 294,0 / 528 = 55,68 %
PAIRE N.5 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory
e.9 Martine Buisseret -Bernard Buisseret 49,62 %
1 NS 3C N = 140 11 50.00
2 NS 3S E+2 -460 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
e.8 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens 43,56 %
3 NS 4C N+1 450 15 68.18
4 NS 3S W-1 100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
e.7 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 53,98 %
5 NS 3P W+1 -170 15 68.18
6 NS 4P S-1 -50 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
e.5 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 48,86 %
9 NS 4T N-1 -50 10 45.45
10 NS 3C W-1 100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
e.4 Nicolas de Neve -Olivier Paternostre 46,78 %
11 NS 4K E-1 50 19 86.36
12 NS 4P S+1 650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
e.3 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Aliona Pascaru 46,02 %
13 NS 3S N-1 -100 14 63.64
14 NS 2C S-1 -50 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
e.2 Helene Christiaens -Teresa Dekoster 58,52 %
15 NS 1S E-1 50 7 31.82
16 NS 3S E+1 -630 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
e.1 Catherine de Moffarts -Marie Morimont 50,95 %
17 NS 4C S+1 450 13 59.09
18 NS 5P E-1 50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
e13 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 52,65 %
19 NS 4P N+2 480 13 59.09
20 NS 4P E+1 -650 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
e12 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 50,95 %
21 NS 2P E = -110 9 40.91
22 NS 4T E = -130 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
e11 Annick Peeters -Neslihan Buharali 38,64 %
23 NS 2C W = -110 18 81.82
24 NS 3PcW-1 100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
e10 Marianne Falla -Noelle Fosse 55,68 %
25 NS 4C N+1 450 18 81.82
26 NS 2P E-1 100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
Total : 292,0 / 528 = 55,30 %
PAIRE N11 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Sylviane Delbeke
e.8 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens 43,56 %
1 NS 4P N+1 450 21 95.45
2 NS 3K E+2 -150 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 95,45 %
e.7 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 53,98 %
3 NS 4C N = 420 7 31.82
4 NS 4P W-1 100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
e.6 Anne France Raquez -Laurence del Marmol 53,79 %
5 NS 4P W = -420 5 22.73
6 NS 3P S+2 200 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
e.5 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 48,86 %
7 NS 1P S-1 -100 19 86.36
8 NS 3C W+2 -200 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
e.4 Nicolas de Neve -Olivier Paternostre 46,78 %
9 NS 3K S-1 -50 10 45.45
10 NS 3C W = -140 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
e.3 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Aliona Pascaru 46,02 %
11 NS 2C N-1 -50 15 68.18
12 NS 4P S+1 650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
e.2 Helene Christiaens -Teresa Dekoster 58,52 %
13 NS 3T N+1 130 20 90.91
14 NS 3C S-1 -50 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
e.1 Catherine de Moffarts -Marie Morimont 50,95 %
15 NS 2C W-1 50 7 31.82
16 NS 3S E = -600 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
e13 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 52,65 %
17 NS 4C S = 420 0 0.00
18 NS 4P E = -420 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
e11 Annick Peeters -Neslihan Buharali 38,64 %
21 NS 2P E = -110 9 40.91
22 NS 3P E-3 300 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
e10 Marianne Falla -Noelle Fosse 55,68 %
23 NS 2C W = -110 18 81.82
24 NS 4P W-3 150 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
e.9 Martine Buisseret -Bernard Buisseret 49,62 %
25 NS 3S S = 400 5 22.73
26 NS 2P E = -110 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
Total : 279,0 / 528 = 52,84 %
PAIRE N.9 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes
e.4 Nicolas de Neve -Olivier Paternostre 46,78 %
1 NS 3S S-1 -50 6 27.27
2 NS 3S E+2 -460 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
e.3 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Aliona Pascaru 46,02 %
3 NS 3S N+2 460 22 100.00
4 NS 4P W-1 100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
e.2 Helene Christiaens -Teresa Dekoster 58,52 %
5 NS 3P E+1 -170 15 68.18
6 NS 2P S+2 170 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
e.1 Catherine de Moffarts -Marie Morimont 50,95 %
7 NS 4T W+1 -150 16 72.73
8 NS 3P W = -140 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
e13 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 52,65 %
9 NS 3K S+1 130 20 90.91
10 NS 3C W-1 100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
e12 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 50,95 %
11 NS 4C N-2 -100 10 45.45
12 NS 4P N+1 650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
e11 Annick Peeters -Neslihan Buharali 38,64 %
13 NS 3S N-2 -200 5 22.73
14 NS 2S S+1 150 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
e.9 Martine Buisseret -Bernard Buisseret 49,62 %
17 NS 4C S+1 450 13 59.09
18 NS 4P E = -420 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
e.8 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens 43,56 %
19 NS 4P N+1 450 8 36.36
20 NS 5P E = -650 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
e.7 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 53,98 %
21 NS 3P E-1 50 18 81.82
22 NS 4T E = -130 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
e.6 Anne France Raquez -Laurence del Marmol 53,79 %
23 NS 2C W+1 -140 9 40.91
24 NS 4T E = -130 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
e.5 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 48,86 %
25 NS 4C N+1 450 18 81.82
26 NS 1P E+2 -140 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
Total : 273,0 / 528 = 51,70 %
PAIRE N12 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe
e10 Marianne Falla -Noelle Fosse 55,68 %
1 NS 4P N-2 -100 1 4.55
2 NS 3S E+2 -460 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
e.9 Martine Buisseret -Bernard Buisseret 49,62 %
3 NS 4C N+1 450 15 68.18
4 NS 2S W-2 200 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
e.8 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens 43,56 %
5 NS 2K W-4 200 22 100.00
6 NS 4P S = 420 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
e.7 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 53,98 %
7 NS 5KcN-3 -800 1 4.55
8 NS 2P W+1 -140 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
e.6 Anne France Raquez -Laurence del Marmol 53,79 %
9 NS 3K S = 110 15 68.18
10 NS 3C W-1 100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
e.5 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 48,86 %
11 NS 3C N-1 -50 15 68.18
12 NS 4P S+1 650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
e.4 Nicolas de Neve -Olivier Paternostre 46,78 %
13 NS 2S N-2 -200 5 22.73
14 NS 2C S = 110 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
e.3 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Aliona Pascaru 46,02 %
15 NS 1S E-1 50 7 31.82
16 NS 3S E+1 -630 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
e.2 Helene Christiaens -Teresa Dekoster 58,52 %
17 NS 5C S = 450 13 59.09
18 NS 4P E+1 -420 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
e.1 Catherine de Moffarts -Marie Morimont 50,95 %
19 NS 4P N+1 450 8 36.36
20 NS 4P E+2 -680 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
e12 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 50,95 %
23 NS 2C W+1 -140 9 40.91
24 NS 4CcS = 590 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
e11 Annick Peeters -Neslihan Buharali 38,64 %
25 NS 4C N+1 450 18 81.82
26 NS 2P E+1 -140 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
Total : 268,0 / 528 = 50,76 %
PAIRE N.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor
e.7 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 53,98 %
1 NS 4P S+1 450 21 95.45
2 NS 3S E+2 -460 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
e.6 Anne France Raquez -Laurence del Marmol 53,79 %
3 NS 4C N+1 450 15 68.18
4 NS 3P E-1 100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
e.4 Nicolas de Neve -Olivier Paternostre 46,78 %
7 NS 5KcN-3 -800 1 4.55
8 NS 4P W-1 50 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
e.3 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Aliona Pascaru 46,02 %
9 NS 5K S-1 -50 10 45.45
10 NS 4C W-4 400 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
e.2 Helene Christiaens -Teresa Dekoster 58,52 %
11 NS 3P N-3 -150 5 22.73
12 NS 4P N+1 650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
e.1 Catherine de Moffarts -Marie Morimont 50,95 %
13 NS 3S N-1 -100 14 63.64
14 NS 3C S = 140 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
e13 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 52,65 %
15 NS 3P S-1 -100 0 0.00
16 NS 3S E+2 -660 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 4,55 %
e12 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 50,95 %
17 NS 5C S = 450 13 59.09
18 NS 5P E-1 50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
e11 Annick Peeters -Neslihan Buharali 38,64 %
19 NS 3KcE = -670 0 0.00
20 NS 4P E+2 -680 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
e10 Marianne Falla -Noelle Fosse 55,68 %
21 NS 2P E = -110 9 40.91
22 NS 4C N-1 -50 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
e.9 Martine Buisseret -Bernard Buisseret 49,62 %
23 NS 3T N = 110 22 100.00
24 NS 5T E = -400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
e.8 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens 43,56 %
25 NS 3C N+2 200 2 9.09
26 NS 3P W-2 200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
Total : 254,0 / 528 = 48,11 %
PAIRE N.8 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson
e.2 Helene Christiaens -Teresa Dekoster 58,52 %
1 NS 3S S-2 -100 1 4.55
2 NS 3S E+1 -430 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
e.1 Catherine de Moffarts -Marie Morimont 50,95 %
3 NS 3K N = 110 3 13.64
4 NS 4P W-1 100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
e13 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 52,65 %
5 NS 4KcN-1 -200 9 40.91
6 NS 3S S+1 430 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
e12 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 50,95 %
7 NS 3P S-3 -300 13 59.09
8 NS 3P W = -140 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
e11 Annick Peeters -Neslihan Buharali 38,64 %
9 NS 3K S+1 130 20 90.91
10 NS 3C W = -140 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
e10 Marianne Falla -Noelle Fosse 55,68 %
11 NS 3P N-3 -150 5 22.73
12 NS 4P N+1 650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
e.8 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens 43,56 %
15 NS 2C W-2 100 18 81.82
16 NS 3S E+2 -660 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
e.7 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 53,98 %
17 NS 3S S+1 430 2 9.09
18 NS 3P E+2 -200 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
e.6 Anne France Raquez -Laurence del Marmol 53,79 %
19 NS 4P N+1 450 8 36.36
20 NS 6P E = -1430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
e.5 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 48,86 %
21 NS 1P E+1 -110 9 40.91
22 NS 2K E = -90 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
e.4 Nicolas de Neve -Olivier Paternostre 46,78 %
23 NS 2C W = -110 18 81.82
24 NS 4C S = 420 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
e.3 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Aliona Pascaru 46,02 %
25 NS 4C N+1 450 18 81.82
26 NS 3P E = -140 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
Total : 249,0 / 528 = 47,16 %
PAIRE N10 Alexandre Viot -Philippe van der Gracht
e.6 Anne France Raquez -Laurence del Marmol 53,79 %
1 NS 4P S = 420 16 72.73
2 NS 4P W+1 -450 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
e.5 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 48,86 %
3 NS 4C N+1 450 15 68.18
4 NS 2P W = -110 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
e.4 Nicolas de Neve -Olivier Paternostre 46,78 %
5 NS 4K N-2 -200 9 40.91
6 NS 4P S = 420 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
e.3 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Aliona Pascaru 46,02 %
7 NS 4PcS-2 -500 6 27.27
8 NS 3P W+1 -170 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
e.2 Helene Christiaens -Teresa Dekoster 58,52 %
9 NS 3S N-2 -100 3 13.64
10 NS 3C W = -140 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
e.1 Catherine de Moffarts -Marie Morimont 50,95 %
11 NS 4C N-2 -100 10 45.45
12 NS 4P S+1 650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
e13 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 52,65 %
13 NS 3TcS = 670 22 100.00
14 NS 4C S-1 -50 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
e12 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 50,95 %
15 NS 1S E-1 50 7 31.82
16 NS 3S E+1 -630 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
e10 Marianne Falla -Noelle Fosse 55,68 %
19 NS 4P N+3 510 21 95.45
20 NS 4P E+2 -680 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
e.9 Martine Buisseret -Bernard Buisseret 49,62 %
21 NS 2P E = -110 9 40.91
22 NS 4T E = -130 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
e.8 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens 43,56 %
23 NS 4T N-2 -200 1 4.55
24 NS 4C S-1 -50 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
e.7 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 53,98 %
25 NS 4C N+1 450 18 81.82
26 NS 2P E = -110 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
Total : 242,0 / 528 = 45,83 %
PAIRE N.6 Gaetan van de Werve -Diane Emsens
e11 Annick Peeters -Neslihan Buharali 38,64 %
1 NS 4P S = 420 16 72.73
2 NS 3K E+2 -150 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
e10 Marianne Falla -Noelle Fosse 55,68 %
3 NS 3K S = 110 3 13.64
4 NS 3CcN-4 -1100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 6,82 %
e.9 Martine Buisseret -Bernard Buisseret 49,62 %
5 NS 4PcW = -590 1 4.55
6 NS 4P S-2 -100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 6,82 %
e.8 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens 43,56 %
7 NS 2P S = 110 22 100.00
8 NS 4P W = -420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
e.6 Anne France Raquez -Laurence del Marmol 53,79 %
11 NS 4C N-2 -100 10 45.45
12 NS 4P S+1 650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
e.5 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 48,86 %
13 NS 2S N-1 -100 14 63.64
14 NS 2C S = 110 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
e.4 Nicolas de Neve -Olivier Paternostre 46,78 %
15 NS 2P W-2 100 18 81.82
16 NS 3S E+1 -630 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
e.3 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Aliona Pascaru 46,02 %
17 NS 4C S+1 450 13 59.09
18 NS 5P E-2 100 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
e.2 Helene Christiaens -Teresa Dekoster 58,52 %
19 NS 4P N-2 -100 2 9.09
20 NS 5P E+1 -680 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
e.1 Catherine de Moffarts -Marie Morimont 50,95 %
21 NS 4P E-2 100 21 95.45
22 NS 4T E = -130 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
e13 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 52,65 %
23 NS 2C W+1 -140 9 40.91
24 NS 2S S-5 -250 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
e12 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 50,95 %
25 NS 3S S = 400 5 22.73
26 NS 2P E = -110 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
Total : 241,0 / 528 = 45,64 %
PAIRE N.3 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren
e.5 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 48,86 %
1 NS 3S S-1 -50 6 27.27
2 NS 3S W = -400 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
e.3 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Aliona Pascaru 46,02 %
5 NS 4PcW = -590 1 4.55
6 NS 4P S = 420 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
e.2 Helene Christiaens -Teresa Dekoster 58,52 %
7 NS 4P S-3 -300 13 59.09
8 NS 3P W = -140 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
e.1 Catherine de Moffarts -Marie Morimont 50,95 %
9 NS 3S N-2 -100 3 13.64
10 NS 2PcS-1 -200 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
e13 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 52,65 %
11 NS 3K E-1 50 19 86.36
12 NS 4P N+1 650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
e12 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 50,95 %
13 NS 3S N-3 -300 0 0.00
14 NS 3S S-2 -100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 4,55 %
e11 Annick Peeters -Neslihan Buharali 38,64 %
15 NS 2C W-2 100 18 81.82
16 NS 3S E = -600 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
e10 Marianne Falla -Noelle Fosse 55,68 %
17 NS 4C S+1 450 13 59.09
18 NS 4P E = -420 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
e.9 Martine Buisseret -Bernard Buisseret 49,62 %
19 NS 3S N+3 490 17 77.27
20 NS 4P W+1 -650 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
e.8 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens 43,56 %
21 NS 2P E = -110 9 40.91
22 NS 3C N = 140 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
e.7 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 53,98 %
23 NS 2C W+1 -140 9 40.91
24 NS 4K S-4 -200 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
e.6 Anne France Raquez -Laurence del Marmol 53,79 %
25 NS 3C N+1 170 0 0.00
26 NS 3P E = -140 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
Total : 238,0 / 528 = 45,08 %
PAIRE N13 Eliane de Ceuninck -Simone Munsterhjelm
e12 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw 50,95 %
1 NS 2P N+1 140 11 50.00
2 NS 3S E+2 -460 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
e11 Annick Peeters -Neslihan Buharali 38,64 %
3 NS 4C N+1 450 15 68.18
4 NS 4P W-2 200 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
e10 Marianne Falla -Noelle Fosse 55,68 %
5 NS 4P W = -420 5 22.73
6 NS 4K N-3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
e.9 Martine Buisseret -Bernard Buisseret 49,62 %
7 NS 4C S-6 -600 4 18.18
8 NS 1P W+2 -140 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
e.8 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens 43,56 %
9 NS 2K S+1 110 15 68.18
10 NS 2PcS-1 -200 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
e.7 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles 53,98 %
11 NS 3P N-4 -200 2 9.09
12 NS 4P S+1 650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
e.6 Anne France Raquez -Laurence del Marmol 53,79 %
13 NS 3S N-1 -100 14 63.64
14 NS 2C S-2 -100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
e.5 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 48,86 %
15 NS 2K E-1 50 7 31.82
16 NS 3S E+1 -630 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
e.4 Nicolas de Neve -Olivier Paternostre 46,78 %
17 NS 4C S+1 450 13 59.09
18 NS 4P E = -420 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
e.3 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Aliona Pascaru 46,02 %
19 NS 3P N+2 200 4 18.18
20 NS 3P E+2 -200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
e.2 Helene Christiaens -Teresa Dekoster 58,52 %
21 NS 2P E = -110 9 40.91
22 NS 3T E+1 -130 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
e13 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker 52,65 %
25 NS 4C N = 420 8 36.36
26 NS 2P E+1 -140 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
Total : 207,0 / 528 = 39,20 %
PAIRE e.2 Helene Christiaens -Teresa Dekoster
N.8 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 47,16 %
1 EO 3S S-2 -100 21 95.45
2 EO 3S E+1 -430 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
N.2 Grazia Neuenschwander -Gerard Cooreman 56,44 %
3 EO 4C N = 420 15 68.18
4 EO 4P W-2 200 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
N.9 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes 51,70 %
5 EO 3P E+1 -170 7 31.82
6 EO 2P S+2 170 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
N.3 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren 45,08 %
7 EO 4P S-3 -300 9 40.91
8 EO 3P W = -140 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
N10 Alexandre Viot -Philippe van der Gracht 45,83 %
9 EO 3S N-2 -100 19 86.36
10 EO 3C W = -140 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
N.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 48,11 %
11 EO 3P N-3 -150 17 77.27
12 EO 4P N+1 650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
N11 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Sylviane Delbeke 52,84 %
13 EO 3T N+1 130 2 9.09
14 EO 3C S-1 -50 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
N.5 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 55,30 %
15 EO 1S E-1 50 15 68.18
16 EO 3S E+1 -630 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
N12 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 50,76 %
17 EO 5C S = 450 9 40.91
18 EO 4P E+1 -420 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
N.6 Gaetan van de Werve -Diane Emsens 45,64 %
19 EO 4P N-2 -100 20 90.91
20 EO 5P E+1 -680 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
N13 Eliane de Ceuninck -Simone Munsterhjelm 39,20 %
21 EO 2P E = -110 13 59.09
22 EO 3T E+1 -130 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
N.7 Pascale Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 55,68 %
23 EO 4T N-2 -200 21 95.45
24 EO 4C N = 420 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
Total : 309,0 / 528 = 58,52 %
PAIRE e10 Marianne Falla -Noelle Fosse
N12 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 50,76 %
1 EO 4P N-2 -100 21 95.45
2 EO 3S E+2 -460 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
N.6 Gaetan van de Werve -Diane Emsens 45,64 %
3 EO 3K S = 110 19 86.36
4 EO 3CcN-4 -1100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 93,18 %
N13 Eliane de Ceuninck -Simone Munsterhjelm 39,20 %
5 EO 4P W = -420 17 77.27
6 EO 4K N-3 -150 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
N.7 Pascale Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 55,68 %
7 EO 4P S-4 -400 13 59.09
8 EO 3P W+1 -170 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
N.1 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 56,25 %
9 EO 4K S = 130 2 9.09
10 EO 4T E-1 100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
N.8 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 47,16 %
11 EO 3P N-3 -150 17 77.27
12 EO 4P N+1 650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
N.2 Grazia Neuenschwander -Gerard Cooreman 56,44 %
13 EO 3S N-1 -100 8 36.36
14 EO 4C S-2 -100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
N.3 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren 45,08 %
17 EO 4C S+1 450 9 40.91
18 EO 4P E = -420 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
N10 Alexandre Viot -Philippe van der Gracht 45,83 %
19 EO 4P N+3 510 1 4.55
20 EO 4P E+2 -680 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
N.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 48,11 %
21 EO 2P E = -110 13 59.09
22 EO 4C N-1 -50 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
N11 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Sylviane Delbeke 52,84 %
23 EO 2C W = -110 4 18.18
24 EO 4P W-3 150 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
N.5 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 55,30 %
25 EO 4C N+1 450 4 18.18
26 EO 2P E-1 100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
Total : 294,0 / 528 = 55,68 %
PAIRE e.7 Lydia Wildiers -Patrick Gilles
N.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 48,11 %
1 EO 4P S+1 450 1 4.55
2 EO 3S E+2 -460 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
N11 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Sylviane Delbeke 52,84 %
3 EO 4C N = 420 15 68.18
4 EO 4P W-1 100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
N.5 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 55,30 %
5 EO 3P W+1 -170 7 31.82
6 EO 4P S-1 -50 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
N12 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 50,76 %
7 EO 5KcN-3 -800 21 95.45
8 EO 2P W+1 -140 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
N13 Eliane de Ceuninck -Simone Munsterhjelm 39,20 %
11 EO 3P N-4 -200 20 90.91
12 EO 4P S+1 650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
N.7 Pascale Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 55,68 %
13 EO 5T S-2 -200 17 77.27
14 EO 3S S+1 430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
N.1 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 56,25 %
15 EO 1S E-1 50 15 68.18
16 EO 3S E+2 -660 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
N.8 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 47,16 %
17 EO 3S S+1 430 20 90.91
18 EO 3P E+2 -200 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
N.2 Grazia Neuenschwander -Gerard Cooreman 56,44 %
19 EO 4P N+3 510 1 4.55
20 EO 4P E+1 -650 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
N.9 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes 51,70 %
21 EO 3P E-1 50 4 18.18
22 EO 4T E = -130 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
N.3 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren 45,08 %
23 EO 2C W+1 -140 13 59.09
24 EO 4K S-4 -200 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
N10 Alexandre Viot -Philippe van der Gracht 45,83 %
25 EO 4C N+1 450 4 18.18
26 EO 2P E = -110 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
Total : 285,0 / 528 = 53,98 %
PAIRE e.6 Anne France Raquez -Laurence del Marmol
N10 Alexandre Viot -Philippe van der Gracht 45,83 %
1 EO 4P S = 420 6 27.27
2 EO 4P W+1 -450 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
N.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 48,11 %
3 EO 4C N+1 450 7 31.82
4 EO 3P E-1 100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
N11 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Sylviane Delbeke 52,84 %
5 EO 4P W = -420 17 77.27
6 EO 3P S+2 200 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
N12 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 50,76 %
9 EO 3K S = 110 7 31.82
10 EO 3C W-1 100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
N.6 Gaetan van de Werve -Diane Emsens 45,64 %
11 EO 4C N-2 -100 12 54.55
12 EO 4P S+1 650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
N13 Eliane de Ceuninck -Simone Munsterhjelm 39,20 %
13 EO 3S N-1 -100 8 36.36
14 EO 2C S-2 -100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
N.7 Pascale Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 55,68 %
15 EO 1S N = 90 8 36.36
16 EO 3S E+1 -630 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
N.1 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 56,25 %
17 EO 4C S+1 450 9 40.91
18 EO 6P E-2 100 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
N.8 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 47,16 %
19 EO 4P N+1 450 14 63.64
20 EO 6P E = -1430 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
N.2 Grazia Neuenschwander -Gerard Cooreman 56,44 %
21 EO 2P E = -110 13 59.09
22 EO 5T E-1 100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
N.9 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes 51,70 %
23 EO 2C W+1 -140 13 59.09
24 EO 4T E = -130 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
N.3 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren 45,08 %
25 EO 3C N+1 170 22 100.00
26 EO 3P E = -140 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
Total : 284,0 / 528 = 53,79 %
PAIRE e13 Jacques Podevyn -David Walker
N.7 Pascale Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 55,68 %
1 EO 4P S-1 -50 16 72.73
2 EO 3S W = -400 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
N.1 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 56,25 %
3 EO 3S N-3 -150 22 100.00
4 EO 4P W-2 200 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
N.8 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 47,16 %
5 EO 4KcN-1 -200 13 59.09
6 EO 3S S+1 430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
N.2 Grazia Neuenschwander -Gerard Cooreman 56,44 %
7 EO 2P S-1 -100 3 13.64
8 EO 3P W+1 -170 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
N.9 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes 51,70 %
9 EO 3K S+1 130 2 9.09
10 EO 3C W-1 100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
N.3 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren 45,08 %
11 EO 3K E-1 50 3 13.64
12 EO 4P N+1 650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
N10 Alexandre Viot -Philippe van der Gracht 45,83 %
13 EO 3TcS = 670 0 0.00
14 EO 4C S-1 -50 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
N.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 48,11 %
15 EO 3P S-1 -100 22 100.00
16 EO 3S E+2 -660 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 95,45 %
N11 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Sylviane Delbeke 52,84 %
17 EO 4C S = 420 22 100.00
18 EO 4P E = -420 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
N.5 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 55,30 %
19 EO 4P N+2 480 9 40.91
20 EO 4P E+1 -650 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
N.6 Gaetan van de Werve -Diane Emsens 45,64 %
23 EO 2C W+1 -140 13 59.09
24 EO 2S S-5 -250 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
N13 Eliane de Ceuninck -Simone Munsterhjelm 39,20 %
25 EO 4C N = 420 14 63.64
26 EO 2P E+1 -140 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
Total : 278,0 / 528 = 52,65 %
PAIRE e12 Helene Schyns -Danielle Wybauw
N13 Eliane de Ceuninck -Simone Munsterhjelm 39,20 %
1 EO 2P N+1 140 11 50.00
2 EO 3S E+2 -460 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
N.7 Pascale Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 55,68 %
3 EO 4C N+1 450 7 31.82
4 EO 4P W-2 200 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
N.1 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 56,25 %
5 EO 2P W+2 -170 7 31.82
6 EO 4P S = 420 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
N.8 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 47,16 %
7 EO 3P S-3 -300 9 40.91
8 EO 3P W = -140 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
N.2 Grazia Neuenschwander -Gerard Cooreman 56,44 %
9 EO 3S N-2 -100 19 86.36
10 EO 3C W-1 100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
N.9 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes 51,70 %
11 EO 4C N-2 -100 12 54.55
12 EO 4P N+1 650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
N.3 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren 45,08 %
13 EO 3S N-3 -300 22 100.00
14 EO 3S S-2 -100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 95,45 %
N10 Alexandre Viot -Philippe van der Gracht 45,83 %
15 EO 1S E-1 50 15 68.18
16 EO 3S E+1 -630 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
N.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 48,11 %
17 EO 5C S = 450 9 40.91
18 EO 5P E-1 50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
N.5 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 55,30 %
21 EO 2P E = -110 13 59.09
22 EO 4T E = -130 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
N12 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 50,76 %
23 EO 2C W+1 -140 13 59.09
24 EO 4CcS = 590 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
N.6 Gaetan van de Werve -Diane Emsens 45,64 %
25 EO 3S S = 400 17 77.27
26 EO 2P E = -110 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
Total : 269,0 / 528 = 50,95 %
PAIRE e.1 Catherine de Moffarts -Marie Morimont
N.1 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 56,25 %
1 EO 4P S = 420 6 27.27
2 EO 3S E+2 -460 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
N.8 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 47,16 %
3 EO 3K N = 110 19 86.36
4 EO 4P W-1 100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
N.2 Grazia Neuenschwander -Gerard Cooreman 56,44 %
5 EO 3P W+1 -170 7 31.82
6 EO 4P S = 420 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
N.9 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes 51,70 %
7 EO 4T W+1 -150 6 27.27
8 EO 3P W = -140 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
N.3 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren 45,08 %
9 EO 3S N-2 -100 19 86.36
10 EO 2PcS-1 -200 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
N10 Alexandre Viot -Philippe van der Gracht 45,83 %
11 EO 4C N-2 -100 12 54.55
12 EO 4P S+1 650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
N.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 48,11 %
13 EO 3S N-1 -100 8 36.36
14 EO 3C S = 140 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
N11 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Sylviane Delbeke 52,84 %
15 EO 2C W-1 50 15 68.18
16 EO 3S E = -600 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
N.5 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 55,30 %
17 EO 4C S+1 450 9 40.91
18 EO 5P E-1 50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
N12 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 50,76 %
19 EO 4P N+1 450 14 63.64
20 EO 4P E+2 -680 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
N.6 Gaetan van de Werve -Diane Emsens 45,64 %
21 EO 4P E-2 100 1 4.55
22 EO 4T E = -130 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
N.7 Pascale Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 55,68 %
25 EO 3S S+1 430 11 50.00
26 EO 3P E = -140 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
Total : 269,0 / 528 = 50,95 %
PAIRE e.9 Martine Buisseret -Bernard Buisseret
N.5 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 55,30 %
1 EO 3C N = 140 11 50.00
2 EO 3S E+2 -460 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
N12 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 50,76 %
3 EO 4C N+1 450 7 31.82
4 EO 2S W-2 200 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
N.6 Gaetan van de Werve -Diane Emsens 45,64 %
5 EO 4PcW = -590 21 95.45
6 EO 4P S-2 -100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 93,18 %
N13 Eliane de Ceuninck -Simone Munsterhjelm 39,20 %
7 EO 4C S-6 -600 18 81.82
8 EO 1P W+2 -140 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
N.7 Pascale Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 55,68 %
9 EO 3S S-2 -100 19 86.36
10 EO 1PcS = 160 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
N.1 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 56,25 %
11 EO 3C N = 140 0 0.00
12 EO 4P S+1 650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
N.2 Grazia Neuenschwander -Gerard Cooreman 56,44 %
15 EO 2S N = 120 0 0.00
16 EO 3S E+1 -630 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
N.9 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes 51,70 %
17 EO 4C S+1 450 9 40.91
18 EO 4P E = -420 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
N.3 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren 45,08 %
19 EO 3S N+3 490 5 22.73
20 EO 4P W+1 -650 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
N10 Alexandre Viot -Philippe van der Gracht 45,83 %
21 EO 2P E = -110 13 59.09
22 EO 4T E = -130 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
N.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 48,11 %
23 EO 3T N = 110 0 0.00
24 EO 5T E = -400 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
N11 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Sylviane Delbeke 52,84 %
25 EO 3S S = 400 17 77.27
26 EO 2P E = -110 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
Total : 262,0 / 528 = 49,62 %
PAIRE e.5 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys
N.3 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren 45,08 %
1 EO 3S S-1 -50 16 72.73
2 EO 3S W = -400 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
N10 Alexandre Viot -Philippe van der Gracht 45,83 %
3 EO 4C N+1 450 7 31.82
4 EO 2P W = -110 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
N11 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Sylviane Delbeke 52,84 %
7 EO 1P S-1 -100 3 13.64
8 EO 3C W+2 -200 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
N.5 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 55,30 %
9 EO 4T N-1 -50 12 54.55
10 EO 3C W-1 100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
N12 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 50,76 %
11 EO 3C N-1 -50 7 31.82
12 EO 4P S+1 650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
N.6 Gaetan van de Werve -Diane Emsens 45,64 %
13 EO 2S N-1 -100 8 36.36
14 EO 2C S = 110 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
N13 Eliane de Ceuninck -Simone Munsterhjelm 39,20 %
15 EO 2K E-1 50 15 68.18
16 EO 3S E+1 -630 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
N.7 Pascale Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 55,68 %
17 EO 4C S+1 450 9 40.91
18 EO 4P E = -420 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
N.1 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 56,25 %
19 EO 4P N+2 480 9 40.91
20 EO 4P E+1 -650 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
N.8 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 47,16 %
21 EO 1P E+1 -110 13 59.09
22 EO 2K E = -90 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
N.2 Grazia Neuenschwander -Gerard Cooreman 56,44 %
23 EO 1C W+2 -140 13 59.09
24 EO 3C N = 140 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
N.9 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes 51,70 %
25 EO 4C N+1 450 4 18.18
26 EO 1P E+2 -140 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
Total : 258,0 / 528 = 48,86 %
PAIRE e.4 Nicolas de Neve -Olivier Paternostre
N.9 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes 51,70 %
1 EO 3S S-1 -50 16 72.73
2 EO 3S E+2 -460 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
N10 Alexandre Viot -Philippe van der Gracht 45,83 %
5 EO 4K N-2 -200 13 59.09
6 EO 4P S = 420 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
N.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 48,11 %
7 EO 5KcN-3 -800 21 95.45
8 EO 4P W-1 50 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
N11 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Sylviane Delbeke 52,84 %
9 EO 3K S-1 -50 12 54.55
10 EO 3C W = -140 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
N.5 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 55,30 %
11 EO 4K E-1 50 3 13.64
12 EO 4P S+1 650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
N12 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 50,76 %
13 EO 2S N-2 -200 17 77.27
14 EO 2C S = 110 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
N.6 Gaetan van de Werve -Diane Emsens 45,64 %
15 EO 2P W-2 100 4 18.18
16 EO 3S E+1 -630 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
N13 Eliane de Ceuninck -Simone Munsterhjelm 39,20 %
17 EO 4C S+1 450 9 40.91
18 EO 4P E = -420 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
N.7 Pascale Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 55,68 %
19 EO 3S N+3 490 5 22.73
20 EO 4P W+1 -650 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
N.1 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 56,25 %
21 EO 1S W+3 -180 22 100.00
22 EO 5T E-1 100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
N.8 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 47,16 %
23 EO 2C W = -110 4 18.18
24 EO 4C S = 420 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
N.2 Grazia Neuenschwander -Gerard Cooreman 56,44 %
25 EO 3S S+1 430 11 50.00
26 EO 2P E = -110 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
Total : 247,0 / 528 = 46,78 %
PAIRE e.3 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Aliona Pascaru
N.9 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes 51,70 %
3 EO 3S N+2 460 0 0.00
4 EO 4P W-1 100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
N.3 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren 45,08 %
5 EO 4PcW = -590 21 95.45
6 EO 4P S = 420 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
N10 Alexandre Viot -Philippe van der Gracht 45,83 %
7 EO 4PcS-2 -500 16 72.73
8 EO 3P W+1 -170 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
N.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 48,11 %
9 EO 5K S-1 -50 12 54.55
10 EO 4C W-4 400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
N11 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Sylviane Delbeke 52,84 %
11 EO 2C N-1 -50 7 31.82
12 EO 4P S+1 650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
N.5 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 55,30 %
13 EO 3S N-1 -100 8 36.36
14 EO 2C S-1 -50 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
N12 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 50,76 %
15 EO 1S E-1 50 15 68.18
16 EO 3S E+1 -630 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
N.6 Gaetan van de Werve -Diane Emsens 45,64 %
17 EO 4C S+1 450 9 40.91
18 EO 5P E-2 100 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
N13 Eliane de Ceuninck -Simone Munsterhjelm 39,20 %
19 EO 3P N+2 200 18 81.82
20 EO 3P E+2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
N.7 Pascale Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 55,68 %
21 EO 4P E-2 100 1 4.55
22 EO 4T E = -130 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
N.1 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 56,25 %
23 EO 2C W+1 -140 13 59.09
24 EO 5T E-1 50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
N.8 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 47,16 %
25 EO 4C N+1 450 4 18.18
26 EO 3P E = -140 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
Total : 243,0 / 528 = 46,02 %
PAIRE e.8 Didier Collart -Michel Lievens
N11 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Sylviane Delbeke 52,84 %
1 EO 4P N+1 450 1 4.55
2 EO 3K E+2 -150 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 4,55 %
N.5 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 55,30 %
3 EO 4C N+1 450 7 31.82
4 EO 3S W-1 100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
N12 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 50,76 %
5 EO 2K W-4 200 0 0.00
6 EO 4P S = 420 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
N.6 Gaetan van de Werve -Diane Emsens 45,64 %
7 EO 2P S = 110 0 0.00
8 EO 4P W = -420 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
N13 Eliane de Ceuninck -Simone Munsterhjelm 39,20 %
9 EO 2K S+1 110 7 31.82
10 EO 2PcS-1 -200 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
N.1 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 56,25 %
13 EO 3S N-2 -200 17 77.27
14 EO 2P E-3 150 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
N.8 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 47,16 %
15 EO 2C W-2 100 4 18.18
16 EO 3S E+2 -660 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
N.2 Grazia Neuenschwander -Gerard Cooreman 56,44 %
17 EO 5C S = 450 9 40.91
18 EO 6P E-1 50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
N.9 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes 51,70 %
19 EO 4P N+1 450 14 63.64
20 EO 5P E = -650 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
N.3 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren 45,08 %
21 EO 2P E = -110 13 59.09
22 EO 3C N = 140 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
N10 Alexandre Viot -Philippe van der Gracht 45,83 %
23 EO 4T N-2 -200 21 95.45
24 EO 4C S-1 -50 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
N.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 48,11 %
25 EO 3C N+2 200 20 90.91
26 EO 3P W-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
Total : 230,0 / 528 = 43,56 %
PAIRE e11 Annick Peeters -Neslihan Buharali
N.6 Gaetan van de Werve -Diane Emsens 45,64 %
1 EO 4P S = 420 6 27.27
2 EO 3K E+2 -150 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
N13 Eliane de Ceuninck -Simone Munsterhjelm 39,20 %
3 EO 4C N+1 450 7 31.82
4 EO 4P W-2 200 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
N.7 Pascale Ortegat -Thierry Bollansee 55,68 %
5 EO 4K N = 130 2 9.09
6 EO 4P S = 420 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
N.1 Francoise Turin -Jeannine Wanderpepen 56,25 %
7 EO 3C S-4 -400 13 59.09
8 EO 4P W-1 50 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
N.8 Michele Verhulst -Peter Masterson 47,16 %
9 EO 3K S+1 130 2 9.09
10 EO 3C W = -140 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
N.2 Grazia Neuenschwander -Gerard Cooreman 56,44 %
11 EO 3KcE = -470 22 100.00
12 EO 4P S+1 650 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
N.9 Rose Marie Vaccarezza -Annie Zeimes 51,70 %
13 EO 3S N-2 -200 17 77.27
14 EO 2S S+1 150 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
N.3 Jean de Villenfagne -Francoise Duren 45,08 %
15 EO 2C W-2 100 4 18.18
16 EO 3S E = -600 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
N.4 Alan Beckman -Stan Tabor 48,11 %
19 EO 3KcE = -670 22 100.00
20 EO 4P E+2 -680 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
N11 Chantal de Lichtervelde -Sylviane Delbeke 52,84 %
21 EO 2P E = -110 13 59.09
22 EO 3P E-3 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
N.5 Myriam de Timary -Ines Drory 55,30 %
23 EO 2C W = -110 4 18.18
24 EO 3PcW-1 100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
N12 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 50,76 %
25 EO 4C N+1 450 4 18.18
26 EO 2P E+1 -140 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
Total : 204,0 / 528 = 38,64 %
|