B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 63,39 A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh
--- 2 61,61 A.2 Hugo Baetens -Francis Rittweger
--- 3 57,14 A10 Francoise Duren -Giuseppe Napoli
--- 4 56,85 A11 Christine Defraigne -Michele Berrier
--- 5 52,68 A.5 Patrick Gilles -Philippe van der Gracht
--- 6 48,81 A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Diane Deslignes
--- 7 44,35 A12 Annie Zeimes -Didier Collart
--- 8 43,75 A.9 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne
--- ~ 43,75 A.3 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens
--- 10 43,15 A.8 Helene Christiaens -Patrizia Vaccani
--- 11 42,86 A.6 Lydia Luyten -Teresa Dekoster
--- 12 41,67 A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Yolande Waerseggers
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 58,33 a.7 Thierry Bollansee -Lydia Wildiers
--- 2 55,36 a.2 Dominique Sassen -Jacques Podevyn
--- 3 55,36 a.8 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin
--- 4 55,06 a.3 Stan Tabor -Michel Lievens
--- 5 53,57 a10 Antoinette Jourdain -Gaetan van de Werve
--- 6 51,79 a11 Ines Drory -Myriam de Timary
--- 7 48,21 a.1 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Jeannine Wanderpepen
--- 8 48,21 a.5 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed
--- ~ 48,21 a12 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
--- 10 46,43 a.6 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant
--- 11 43,75 a.4 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Marie Claire Vienne
--- 12 35,71 a.9 Diane Czarnocki -Christine Brouckaert
PAIRE A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh
a12 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 48,21 %
1 NS 3K E-1 50 13 92.86
2 NS 2K W+1 -110 8 57.14
3 NS 2C N = 110 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
a11 Ines Drory -Myriam de Timary 51,79 %
4 NS 4C S = 620 8 57.14
5 NS 3S S = 600 10 71.43
6 NS 2C N = 110 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
a.7 Thierry Bollansee -Lydia Wildiers 58,33 %
19 NS 5T W+1 -620 9 64.29
20 NS 3S S+1 630 13 92.86
21 NS 2S W = -120 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.6 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 46,43 %
22 NS 4P S = 420 12 85.71
23 NS 1S W+2 -150 11 78.57
24 NS 2C E-1 50 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
a.5 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 48,21 %
25 NS 5TcE-2 500 14 100.00
26 NS 3C S-1 -100 11 78.57
27 NS 4P W-2 100 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
a.4 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Marie Claire Vienne 43,75 %
28 NS 3S N = 600 7 50.00
29 NS 2S E+1 -150 5 35.71
30 NS 4C N = 420 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
a.3 Stan Tabor -Michel Lievens 55,06 %
31 NS 3S W-1 50 13 92.86
32 NS 2P S+2 170 10 71.43
33 NS 3P N+3 230 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Jacques Podevyn 55,36 %
34 NS 3P S = 140 9 64.29
35 NS 2P S = 110 13 92.86
36 NS 3C W+1 -170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
Total : 213,0 / 336 = 63,39 %
PAIRE A.2 Hugo Baetens -Francis Rittweger
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Jacques Podevyn 55,36 %
4 NS 4C S-1 -100 0 0.00
5 NS 4C S-2 -200 0 0.00
6 NS 2C N = 110 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
a.1 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Jeannine Wanderpepen 48,21 %
7 NS 2P N = 110 13 92.86
8 NS 4C W-1 50 10 71.43
9 NS 4T N-2 -100 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
a12 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 48,21 %
10 NS 4P N+1 650 8 57.14
11 NS 4C W = -420 7 50.00
12 NS 4P W+1 -450 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
a11 Ines Drory -Myriam de Timary 51,79 %
13 NS 3C E+2 -200 12 85.71
14 NS 3S S+2 460 13 92.86
15 NS 4P W+1 -450 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
a10 Antoinette Jourdain -Gaetan van de Werve 53,57 %
16 NS 3PcE-1 200 7 50.00
17 NS 4C E+1 -450 7 50.00
18 NS 3P W-1 50 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
a.9 Diane Czarnocki -Christine Brouckaert 35,71 %
19 NS 5T W+1 -620 9 64.29
20 NS 5T S = 600 8 57.14
21 NS 3S W-1 50 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
a.7 Thierry Bollansee -Lydia Wildiers 58,33 %
22 NS 4P S = 420 12 85.71
23 NS 1S E+2 -150 11 78.57
24 NS 2K W-1 50 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
a.6 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 46,43 %
25 NS 4C S+1 450 12 85.71
26 NS 4C N-1 -100 11 78.57
27 NS 3S E-3 150 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
Total : 207,0 / 336 = 61,61 %
PAIRE A10 Francoise Duren -Giuseppe Napoli
a.7 Thierry Bollansee -Lydia Wildiers 58,33 %
1 NS 3PcN-2 -300 0 0.00
2 NS 2C S-1 -100 14 100.00
3 NS 2C N-1 -50 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
a.6 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 46,43 %
4 NS 4C S = 620 8 57.14
5 NS 4C S-1 -100 3 21.43
6 NS 3C N-1 -50 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.5 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 48,21 %
7 NS 2P N = 110 13 92.86
8 NS 4T W-2 100 14 100.00
9 NS 5TcS-3 -500 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
a.3 Stan Tabor -Michel Lievens 55,06 %
10 NS 4P N+1 650 8 57.14
11 NS 4PcS-2 -300 10 71.43
12 NS 4P W+1 -450 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Jacques Podevyn 55,36 %
13 NS 4C E = -620 7 50.00
14 NS 3S S+2 460 13 92.86
15 NS 4P W+1 -450 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
a10 Antoinette Jourdain -Gaetan van de Werve 53,57 %
28 NS 3S N+1 630 14 100.00
29 NS 1S W+2 -150 5 35.71
30 NS 3S N+1 430 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
a.9 Diane Czarnocki -Christine Brouckaert 35,71 %
31 NS 2T W-1 50 13 92.86
32 NS 4P S-2 -100 3 21.43
33 NS 4P N+1 450 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
a.8 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin 55,36 %
34 NS 2P S+1 140 9 64.29
35 NS 2P S-1 -50 7 50.00
36 NS 2C W+1 -140 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 192,0 / 336 = 57,14 %
PAIRE A11 Christine Defraigne -Michele Berrier
a.9 Diane Czarnocki -Christine Brouckaert 35,71 %
1 NS 4K E-1 50 13 92.86
2 NS 2K W+1 -110 8 57.14
3 NS 2K E-1 100 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.8 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin 55,36 %
4 NS 4C S+1 650 14 100.00
5 NS 4C S = 620 13 92.86
6 NS 3T W+1 -130 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.7 Thierry Bollansee -Lydia Wildiers 58,33 %
7 NS 2PcN-1 -200 1 7.14
8 NS 4C W-1 50 10 71.43
9 NS 4P W = -620 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
a.6 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 46,43 %
10 NS 4P N+1 650 8 57.14
11 NS 4C W = -420 7 50.00
12 NS 4P W+2 -480 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
a.4 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Marie Claire Vienne 43,75 %
13 NS 4C E+1 -650 1 7.14
14 NS 3T N+2 150 7 50.00
15 NS 2P E+3 -200 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
a.3 Stan Tabor -Michel Lievens 55,06 %
16 NS 2PcE-1 200 7 50.00
17 NS 3S W+1 -430 10 71.43
18 NS 3S N+1 630 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
a11 Ines Drory -Myriam de Timary 51,79 %
31 NS 4P E = -420 7 50.00
32 NS 2S N-1 -50 7 50.00
33 NS 3PcN+2 730 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a10 Antoinette Jourdain -Gaetan van de Werve 53,57 %
34 NS 3P S = 140 9 64.29
35 NS 2P S = 110 13 92.86
36 NS 2C W+1 -140 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
Total : 191,0 / 336 = 56,85 %
PAIRE A.5 Patrick Gilles -Philippe van der Gracht
a.5 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 48,21 %
13 NS 4C W = -620 7 50.00
14 NS 3T N+1 130 3 21.43
15 NS 4P W+1 -450 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
a.4 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Marie Claire Vienne 43,75 %
16 NS 3S S = 400 10 71.43
17 NS 4C E-1 50 13 92.86
18 NS 3S S = 600 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 80,95 %
a.3 Stan Tabor -Michel Lievens 55,06 %
19 NS 6T W = -1370 1 7.14
20 NS 3S N = 600 8 57.14
21 NS 2S W = -120 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Jacques Podevyn 55,36 %
22 NS 3S S-1 -50 5 35.71
23 NS 3S E+3 -690 0 0.00
24 NS 2T N+1 110 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
a.1 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Jeannine Wanderpepen 48,21 %
25 NS 4C N = 420 7 50.00
26 NS 3K E = -110 5 35.71
27 NS 3P W-3 150 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a12 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 48,21 %
28 NS 3S N = 600 7 50.00
29 NS 2P S = 110 14 100.00
30 NS 4C N+2 480 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
a10 Antoinette Jourdain -Gaetan van de Werve 53,57 %
31 NS 4P E+1 -450 1 7.14
32 NS 4P S-2 -100 3 21.43
33 NS 4P N+1 450 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
a.9 Diane Czarnocki -Christine Brouckaert 35,71 %
34 NS 3P S = 140 9 64.29
35 NS 3P S-1 -50 7 50.00
36 NS 1S S-1 -100 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 177,0 / 336 = 52,68 %
PAIRE A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Diane Deslignes
a.4 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Marie Claire Vienne 43,75 %
10 NS 5P N = 650 8 57.14
11 NS 4P S = 420 14 100.00
12 NS 4P W = -420 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
a.3 Stan Tabor -Michel Lievens 55,06 %
13 NS 4C E+1 -650 1 7.14
14 NS 3T N+2 150 7 50.00
15 NS 2P E+3 -200 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Jacques Podevyn 55,36 %
16 NS 4C N = 420 13 92.86
17 NS 4C E+2 -480 2 14.29
18 NS 3P W-1 50 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
a.1 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Jeannine Wanderpepen 48,21 %
19 NS 5CcS-5 -1100 4 28.57
20 NS 3S N+1 630 13 92.86
21 NS 3S E = -400 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
a12 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 48,21 %
22 NS 4P S-2 -100 0 0.00
23 NS 1S W+4 -210 8 57.14
24 NS 2K W = -90 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 21,43 %
a11 Ines Drory -Myriam de Timary 51,79 %
25 NS 4C N = 420 7 50.00
26 NS 3K W = -110 5 35.71
27 NS 3P W = -140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
a.9 Diane Czarnocki -Christine Brouckaert 35,71 %
28 NS 3S N = 600 7 50.00
29 NS 1S W+1 -120 12 85.71
30 NS 4C N+1 450 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
a.8 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin 55,36 %
31 NS 4P E = -420 7 50.00
32 NS 3S N = 400 12 85.71
33 NS 4P N = 420 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
Total : 164,0 / 336 = 48,81 %
PAIRE A12 Annie Zeimes -Didier Collart
a11 Ines Drory -Myriam de Timary 51,79 %
1 NS 3K E = -110 8 57.14
2 NS 2K W+1 -110 8 57.14
3 NS 2C N-1 -50 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
a10 Antoinette Jourdain -Gaetan van de Werve 53,57 %
4 NS 3C S+2 200 2 14.29
5 NS 2K N+5 190 7 50.00
6 NS 3C N-2 -100 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
a.9 Diane Czarnocki -Christine Brouckaert 35,71 %
7 NS 2P N-1 -100 9 64.29
8 NS 2P N-1 -50 5 35.71
9 NS 4P W = -620 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
a.8 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin 55,36 %
10 NS 5P N-1 -100 0 0.00
11 NS 5CcE = -650 0 0.00
12 NS 4P W = -420 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
a.7 Thierry Bollansee -Lydia Wildiers 58,33 %
13 NS 4K E+1 -150 14 100.00
14 NS 3T N+1 130 3 21.43
15 NS 3P W+2 -200 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
a.5 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 48,21 %
16 NS 2C N+1 140 3 21.43
17 NS 3S W+2 -460 4 28.57
18 NS 3T S-1 -100 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 21,43 %
a.4 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Marie Claire Vienne 43,75 %
19 NS 5CcS-3 -500 14 100.00
20 NS 5T S-1 -100 2 14.29
21 NS 3S W-1 50 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a12 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 48,21 %
34 NS 3P S = 140 9 64.29
35 NS 3P S-1 -50 7 50.00
36 NS 2C W+1 -140 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 149,0 / 336 = 44,35 %
PAIRE A.9 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne
a.5 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 48,21 %
1 NS 3K E+1 -130 3 21.43
2 NS 2K W+1 -110 8 57.14
3 NS 2C N = 110 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
a.4 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Marie Claire Vienne 43,75 %
4 NS 4C S = 620 8 57.14
5 NS 3K N+4 190 7 50.00
6 NS 3T W+1 -130 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Jacques Podevyn 55,36 %
7 NS 2P N-2 -200 1 7.14
8 NS 2P N-2 -100 2 14.29
9 NS 5P W-1 100 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
a.1 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Jeannine Wanderpepen 48,21 %
10 NS 4P N+1 650 8 57.14
11 NS 4CcW = -590 2 14.29
12 NS 4P W+1 -450 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
a.9 Diane Czarnocki -Christine Brouckaert 35,71 %
25 NS 4C S = 420 7 50.00
26 NS 3C S = 140 14 100.00
27 NS 3S E-6 300 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
a.8 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin 55,36 %
28 NS 3S N-1 -100 0 0.00
29 NS 1S W+2 -150 5 35.71
30 NS 4C N = 420 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 21,43 %
a.7 Thierry Bollansee -Lydia Wildiers 58,33 %
31 NS 4P E+1 -450 1 7.14
32 NS 3S N-3 -150 0 0.00
33 NS 4P N+1 450 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
a.6 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 46,43 %
34 NS 4P S-2 -200 0 0.00
35 NS 2P S-1 -50 7 50.00
36 NS 3C W-1 100 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 147,0 / 336 = 43,75 %
PAIRE A.3 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens
a.3 Stan Tabor -Michel Lievens 55,06 %
7 NS 4T E = -130 6 42.86
8 NS 4C W = -420 0 0.00
9 NS 3P W+1 -170 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Jacques Podevyn 55,36 %
10 NS 4P N+1 650 8 57.14
11 NS 4PcS-1 -100 12 85.71
12 NS 4P W+2 -480 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.1 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Jeannine Wanderpepen 48,21 %
13 NS 4C E = -620 7 50.00
14 NS 2T N+1 110 0 0.00
15 NS 3P W+1 -170 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a12 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 48,21 %
16 NS 4C S-1 -50 0 0.00
17 NS 6S W-1 50 13 92.86
18 NS 3S N = 600 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
a11 Ines Drory -Myriam de Timary 51,79 %
19 NS 6T W = -1370 1 7.14
20 NS 3C N-1 -100 2 14.29
21 NS 3S W-1 50 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
a10 Antoinette Jourdain -Gaetan van de Werve 53,57 %
22 NS 3S S-1 -50 5 35.71
23 NS 3S W+1 -630 2 14.29
24 NS 3C E-1 50 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.8 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin 55,36 %
25 NS 4C S = 420 7 50.00
26 NS 3K E = -110 5 35.71
27 NS 3S E-4 200 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
a.7 Thierry Bollansee -Lydia Wildiers 58,33 %
28 NS 3S N = 600 7 50.00
29 NS 1S W+2 -150 5 35.71
30 NS 4C N-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
Total : 147,0 / 336 = 43,75 %
PAIRE A.8 Helene Christiaens -Patrizia Vaccani
a.3 Stan Tabor -Michel Lievens 55,06 %
1 NS 3K E+1 -130 3 21.43
2 NS 2S W = -120 2 14.29
3 NS 3K E-1 100 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
a.1 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Jeannine Wanderpepen 48,21 %
4 NS 4C S = 620 8 57.14
5 NS 5K S+1 620 13 92.86
6 NS 2CcN-1 -100 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
a12 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 48,21 %
7 NS 4T W+1 -150 4 28.57
8 NS 4C W-1 50 10 71.43
9 NS 4P W+1 -650 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.8 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin 55,36 %
22 NS 3S S-1 -50 5 35.71
23 NS 3S W = -600 5 35.71
24 NS 3CcE-1 100 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
a.7 Thierry Bollansee -Lydia Wildiers 58,33 %
25 NS 5K S-3 -150 0 0.00
26 NS 3K W+1 -130 0 0.00
27 NS 3K E+1 -130 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 4,76 %
a.6 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 46,43 %
28 NS 3S N = 600 7 50.00
29 NS 1S W+2 -150 5 35.71
30 NS 4C N+1 450 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
a.5 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 48,21 %
31 NS 4P E = -420 7 50.00
32 NS 4P S = 420 14 100.00
33 NS 4P N+1 450 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
a.4 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Marie Claire Vienne 43,75 %
34 NS 3P S = 140 9 64.29
35 NS 1S N-2 -100 1 7.14
36 NS 2C W+1 -140 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
Total : 145,0 / 336 = 43,15 %
PAIRE A.6 Lydia Luyten -Teresa Dekoster
a10 Antoinette Jourdain -Gaetan van de Werve 53,57 %
1 NS 2K E+1 -110 8 57.14
2 NS 2K W+2 -130 0 0.00
3 NS 2P W-2 200 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
a.6 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 46,43 %
16 NS 4C N = 420 13 92.86
17 NS 4C E+1 -450 7 50.00
18 NS 3S N-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
a.5 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 48,21 %
19 NS 5T W+1 -620 9 64.29
20 NS 3S N = 600 8 57.14
21 NS 3S W = -400 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
a.4 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Marie Claire Vienne 43,75 %
22 NS 4P S = 420 12 85.71
23 NS 3K E = -110 14 100.00
24 NS 1S E = -90 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
a.3 Stan Tabor -Michel Lievens 55,06 %
25 NS 3C S+1 170 2 14.29
26 NS 3K W = -110 5 35.71
27 NS 4C S-2 -100 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
a.2 Dominique Sassen -Jacques Podevyn 55,36 %
28 NS 3S N = 600 7 50.00
29 NS 1S W+2 -150 5 35.71
30 NS 4C N = 420 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
a.1 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Jeannine Wanderpepen 48,21 %
31 NS 4P E = -420 7 50.00
32 NS 3S N-1 -50 7 50.00
33 NS 4P N = 420 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
a11 Ines Drory -Myriam de Timary 51,79 %
34 NS 2P S = 110 2 14.29
35 NS 3P S-2 -100 1 7.14
36 NS 2C W = -110 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
Total : 144,0 / 336 = 42,86 %
PAIRE A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Yolande Waerseggers
a.1 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Jeannine Wanderpepen 48,21 %
1 NS 3K E = -110 8 57.14
2 NS 2K W+1 -110 8 57.14
3 NS 2C S-1 -50 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
a12 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 48,21 %
4 NS 4C S = 620 8 57.14
5 NS 4C S-1 -100 3 21.43
6 NS 3C N-2 -100 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
a11 Ines Drory -Myriam de Timary 51,79 %
7 NS 2P N-1 -100 9 64.29
8 NS 2P N-1 -50 5 35.71
9 NS 4P W = -620 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
a10 Antoinette Jourdain -Gaetan van de Werve 53,57 %
10 NS 4P N+1 650 8 57.14
11 NS 4C E+1 -450 4 28.57
12 NS 4P W+1 -450 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
a.9 Diane Czarnocki -Christine Brouckaert 35,71 %
13 NS 4C E = -620 7 50.00
14 NS 2S S+3 210 10 71.43
15 NS 4P E = -420 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
a.8 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin 55,36 %
16 NS 3C N = 140 3 21.43
17 NS 3S W+3 -490 0 0.00
18 NS 3PcW-1 100 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
a.6 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 46,43 %
19 NS 5T W+1 -620 9 64.29
20 NS 4C N-1 -100 2 14.29
21 NS 2S W = -120 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
a.5 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 48,21 %
22 NS 4P S-1 -50 5 35.71
23 NS 3S W = -600 5 35.71
24 NS 2C E-1 50 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
Total : 140,0 / 336 = 41,67 %
PAIRE a.7 Thierry Bollansee -Lydia Wildiers
A10 Francoise Duren -Giuseppe Napoli 57,14 %
1 EO 3PcN-2 -300 14 100.00
2 EO 2C S-1 -100 0 0.00
3 EO 2C N-1 -50 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
A11 Christine Defraigne -Michele Berrier 56,85 %
7 EO 2PcN-1 -200 13 92.86
8 EO 4C W-1 50 4 28.57
9 EO 4P W = -620 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
A12 Annie Zeimes -Didier Collart 44,35 %
13 EO 4K E+1 -150 0 0.00
14 EO 3T N+1 130 11 78.57
15 EO 3P W+2 -200 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 63,39 %
19 EO 5T W+1 -620 5 35.71
20 EO 3S S+1 630 1 7.14
21 EO 2S W = -120 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.2 Hugo Baetens -Francis Rittweger 61,61 %
22 EO 4P S = 420 2 14.29
23 EO 1S E+2 -150 3 21.43
24 EO 2K W-1 50 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
A.8 Helene Christiaens -Patrizia Vaccani 43,15 %
25 EO 5K S-3 -150 14 100.00
26 EO 3K W+1 -130 14 100.00
27 EO 3K E+1 -130 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 95,24 %
A.3 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 43,75 %
28 EO 3S N = 600 7 50.00
29 EO 1S W+2 -150 9 64.29
30 EO 4C N-1 -50 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
A.9 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 43,75 %
31 EO 4P E+1 -450 13 92.86
32 EO 3S N-3 -150 14 100.00
33 EO 4P N+1 450 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
Total : 196,0 / 336 = 58,33 %
PAIRE a.2 Dominique Sassen -Jacques Podevyn
A.2 Hugo Baetens -Francis Rittweger 61,61 %
4 EO 4C S-1 -100 14 100.00
5 EO 4C S-2 -200 14 100.00
6 EO 2C N = 110 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
A.9 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 43,75 %
7 EO 2P N-2 -200 13 92.86
8 EO 2P N-2 -100 12 85.71
9 EO 5P W-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
A.3 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 43,75 %
10 EO 4P N+1 650 6 42.86
11 EO 4PcS-1 -100 2 14.29
12 EO 4P W+2 -480 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A10 Francoise Duren -Giuseppe Napoli 57,14 %
13 EO 4C E = -620 7 50.00
14 EO 3S S+2 460 1 7.14
15 EO 4P W+1 -450 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Diane Deslignes 48,81 %
16 EO 4C N = 420 1 7.14
17 EO 4C E+2 -480 12 85.71
18 EO 3P W-1 50 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
A.5 Patrick Gilles -Philippe van der Gracht 52,68 %
22 EO 3S S-1 -50 9 64.29
23 EO 3S E+3 -690 14 100.00
24 EO 2T N+1 110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
A.6 Lydia Luyten -Teresa Dekoster 42,86 %
28 EO 3S N = 600 7 50.00
29 EO 1S W+2 -150 9 64.29
30 EO 4C N = 420 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 63,39 %
34 EO 3P S = 140 5 35.71
35 EO 2P S = 110 1 7.14
36 EO 3C W+1 -170 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
Total : 186,0 / 336 = 55,36 %
PAIRE a.8 Nicole Leclere -Francoise Turin
A11 Christine Defraigne -Michele Berrier 56,85 %
4 EO 4C S+1 650 0 0.00
5 EO 4C S = 620 1 7.14
6 EO 3T W+1 -130 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A12 Annie Zeimes -Didier Collart 44,35 %
10 EO 5P N-1 -100 14 100.00
11 EO 5CcE = -650 14 100.00
12 EO 4P W = -420 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Yolande Waerseggers 41,67 %
16 EO 3C N = 140 11 78.57
17 EO 3S W+3 -490 14 100.00
18 EO 3PcW-1 100 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
A.8 Helene Christiaens -Patrizia Vaccani 43,15 %
22 EO 3S S-1 -50 9 64.29
23 EO 3S W = -600 9 64.29
24 EO 3CcE-1 100 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A.3 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 43,75 %
25 EO 4C S = 420 7 50.00
26 EO 3K E = -110 9 64.29
27 EO 3S E-4 200 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
A.9 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 43,75 %
28 EO 3S N-1 -100 14 100.00
29 EO 1S W+2 -150 9 64.29
30 EO 4C N = 420 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 78,57 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Diane Deslignes 48,81 %
31 EO 4P E = -420 7 50.00
32 EO 3S N = 400 2 14.29
33 EO 4P N = 420 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A10 Francoise Duren -Giuseppe Napoli 57,14 %
34 EO 2P S+1 140 5 35.71
35 EO 2P S-1 -50 7 50.00
36 EO 2C W+1 -140 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 186,0 / 336 = 55,36 %
PAIRE a.3 Stan Tabor -Michel Lievens
A.8 Helene Christiaens -Patrizia Vaccani 43,15 %
1 EO 3K E+1 -130 11 78.57
2 EO 2S W = -120 12 85.71
3 EO 3K E-1 100 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
A.3 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 43,75 %
7 EO 4T E = -130 8 57.14
8 EO 4C W = -420 14 100.00
9 EO 3P W+1 -170 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
A10 Francoise Duren -Giuseppe Napoli 57,14 %
10 EO 4P N+1 650 6 42.86
11 EO 4PcS-2 -300 4 28.57
12 EO 4P W+1 -450 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Diane Deslignes 48,81 %
13 EO 4C E+1 -650 13 92.86
14 EO 3T N+2 150 7 50.00
15 EO 2P E+3 -200 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
A11 Christine Defraigne -Michele Berrier 56,85 %
16 EO 2PcE-1 200 7 50.00
17 EO 3S W+1 -430 4 28.57
18 EO 3S N+1 630 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
A.5 Patrick Gilles -Philippe van der Gracht 52,68 %
19 EO 6T W = -1370 13 92.86
20 EO 3S N = 600 6 42.86
21 EO 2S W = -120 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
A.6 Lydia Luyten -Teresa Dekoster 42,86 %
25 EO 3C S+1 170 12 85.71
26 EO 3K W = -110 9 64.29
27 EO 4C S-2 -100 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 63,39 %
31 EO 3S W-1 50 1 7.14
32 EO 2P S+2 170 4 28.57
33 EO 3P N+3 230 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
Total : 185,0 / 336 = 55,06 %
PAIRE a10 Antoinette Jourdain -Gaetan van de Werve
A.6 Lydia Luyten -Teresa Dekoster 42,86 %
1 EO 2K E+1 -110 6 42.86
2 EO 2K W+2 -130 14 100.00
3 EO 2P W-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A12 Annie Zeimes -Didier Collart 44,35 %
4 EO 3C S+2 200 12 85.71
5 EO 2K N+5 190 7 50.00
6 EO 3C N-2 -100 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Yolande Waerseggers 41,67 %
10 EO 4P N+1 650 6 42.86
11 EO 4C E+1 -450 10 71.43
12 EO 4P W+1 -450 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
A.2 Hugo Baetens -Francis Rittweger 61,61 %
16 EO 3PcE-1 200 7 50.00
17 EO 4C E+1 -450 7 50.00
18 EO 3P W-1 50 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
A.3 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 43,75 %
22 EO 3S S-1 -50 9 64.29
23 EO 3S W+1 -630 12 85.71
24 EO 3C E-1 50 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A10 Francoise Duren -Giuseppe Napoli 57,14 %
28 EO 3S N+1 630 0 0.00
29 EO 1S W+2 -150 9 64.29
30 EO 3S N+1 430 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
A.5 Patrick Gilles -Philippe van der Gracht 52,68 %
31 EO 4P E+1 -450 13 92.86
32 EO 4P S-2 -100 11 78.57
33 EO 4P N+1 450 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
A11 Christine Defraigne -Michele Berrier 56,85 %
34 EO 3P S = 140 5 35.71
35 EO 2P S = 110 1 7.14
36 EO 2C W+1 -140 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
Total : 180,0 / 336 = 53,57 %
PAIRE a11 Ines Drory -Myriam de Timary
A12 Annie Zeimes -Didier Collart 44,35 %
1 EO 3K E = -110 6 42.86
2 EO 2K W+1 -110 6 42.86
3 EO 2C N-1 -50 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 63,39 %
4 EO 4C S = 620 6 42.86
5 EO 3S S = 600 4 28.57
6 EO 2C N = 110 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Yolande Waerseggers 41,67 %
7 EO 2P N-1 -100 5 35.71
8 EO 2P N-1 -50 9 64.29
9 EO 4P W = -620 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
A.2 Hugo Baetens -Francis Rittweger 61,61 %
13 EO 3C E+2 -200 2 14.29
14 EO 3S S+2 460 1 7.14
15 EO 4P W+1 -450 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
A.3 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 43,75 %
19 EO 6T W = -1370 13 92.86
20 EO 3C N-1 -100 12 85.71
21 EO 3S W-1 50 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Diane Deslignes 48,81 %
25 EO 4C N = 420 7 50.00
26 EO 3K W = -110 9 64.29
27 EO 3P W = -140 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
A11 Christine Defraigne -Michele Berrier 56,85 %
31 EO 4P E = -420 7 50.00
32 EO 2S N-1 -50 7 50.00
33 EO 3PcN+2 730 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.6 Lydia Luyten -Teresa Dekoster 42,86 %
34 EO 2P S = 110 12 85.71
35 EO 3P S-2 -100 13 92.86
36 EO 2C W = -110 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
Total : 174,0 / 336 = 51,79 %
PAIRE a.1 Marie J. de Wagheneire -Jeannine Wanderpepen
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Yolande Waerseggers 41,67 %
1 EO 3K E = -110 6 42.86
2 EO 2K W+1 -110 6 42.86
3 EO 2C S-1 -50 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
A.8 Helene Christiaens -Patrizia Vaccani 43,15 %
4 EO 4C S = 620 6 42.86
5 EO 5K S+1 620 1 7.14
6 EO 2CcN-1 -100 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
A.2 Hugo Baetens -Francis Rittweger 61,61 %
7 EO 2P N = 110 1 7.14
8 EO 4C W-1 50 4 28.57
9 EO 4T N-2 -100 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
A.9 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 43,75 %
10 EO 4P N+1 650 6 42.86
11 EO 4CcW = -590 12 85.71
12 EO 4P W+1 -450 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
A.3 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 43,75 %
13 EO 4C E = -620 7 50.00
14 EO 2T N+1 110 14 100.00
15 EO 3P W+1 -170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Diane Deslignes 48,81 %
19 EO 5CcS-5 -1100 10 71.43
20 EO 3S N+1 630 1 7.14
21 EO 3S E = -400 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
A.5 Patrick Gilles -Philippe van der Gracht 52,68 %
25 EO 4C N = 420 7 50.00
26 EO 3K E = -110 9 64.29
27 EO 3P W-3 150 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.6 Lydia Luyten -Teresa Dekoster 42,86 %
31 EO 4P E = -420 7 50.00
32 EO 3S N-1 -50 7 50.00
33 EO 4P N = 420 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
Total : 162,0 / 336 = 48,21 %
PAIRE a.5 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed
A.9 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 43,75 %
1 EO 3K E+1 -130 11 78.57
2 EO 2K W+1 -110 6 42.86
3 EO 2C N = 110 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A10 Francoise Duren -Giuseppe Napoli 57,14 %
7 EO 2P N = 110 1 7.14
8 EO 4T W-2 100 0 0.00
9 EO 5TcS-3 -500 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
A.5 Patrick Gilles -Philippe van der Gracht 52,68 %
13 EO 4C W = -620 7 50.00
14 EO 3T N+1 130 11 78.57
15 EO 4P W+1 -450 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
A12 Annie Zeimes -Didier Collart 44,35 %
16 EO 2C N+1 140 11 78.57
17 EO 3S W+2 -460 10 71.43
18 EO 3T S-1 -100 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 78,57 %
A.6 Lydia Luyten -Teresa Dekoster 42,86 %
19 EO 5T W+1 -620 5 35.71
20 EO 3S N = 600 6 42.86
21 EO 3S W = -400 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Yolande Waerseggers 41,67 %
22 EO 4P S-1 -50 9 64.29
23 EO 3S W = -600 9 64.29
24 EO 2C E-1 50 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 63,39 %
25 EO 5TcE-2 500 0 0.00
26 EO 3C S-1 -100 3 21.43
27 EO 4P W-2 100 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
A.8 Helene Christiaens -Patrizia Vaccani 43,15 %
31 EO 4P E = -420 7 50.00
32 EO 4P S = 420 0 0.00
33 EO 4P N+1 450 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
Total : 162,0 / 336 = 48,21 %
PAIRE a12 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 63,39 %
1 EO 3K E-1 50 1 7.14
2 EO 2K W+1 -110 6 42.86
3 EO 2C N = 110 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Yolande Waerseggers 41,67 %
4 EO 4C S = 620 6 42.86
5 EO 4C S-1 -100 11 78.57
6 EO 3C N-2 -100 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
A.8 Helene Christiaens -Patrizia Vaccani 43,15 %
7 EO 4T W+1 -150 10 71.43
8 EO 4C W-1 50 4 28.57
9 EO 4P W+1 -650 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.2 Hugo Baetens -Francis Rittweger 61,61 %
10 EO 4P N+1 650 6 42.86
11 EO 4C W = -420 7 50.00
12 EO 4P W+1 -450 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A.3 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 43,75 %
16 EO 4C S-1 -50 14 100.00
17 EO 6S W-1 50 1 7.14
18 EO 3S N = 600 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Diane Deslignes 48,81 %
22 EO 4P S-2 -100 14 100.00
23 EO 1S W+4 -210 6 42.86
24 EO 2K W = -90 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 78,57 %
A.5 Patrick Gilles -Philippe van der Gracht 52,68 %
28 EO 3S N = 600 7 50.00
29 EO 2P S = 110 0 0.00
30 EO 4C N+2 480 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
A12 Annie Zeimes -Didier Collart 44,35 %
34 EO 3P S = 140 5 35.71
35 EO 3P S-1 -50 7 50.00
36 EO 2C W+1 -140 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 162,0 / 336 = 48,21 %
PAIRE a.6 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant
A10 Francoise Duren -Giuseppe Napoli 57,14 %
4 EO 4C S = 620 6 42.86
5 EO 4C S-1 -100 11 78.57
6 EO 3C N-1 -50 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A11 Christine Defraigne -Michele Berrier 56,85 %
10 EO 4P N+1 650 6 42.86
11 EO 4C W = -420 7 50.00
12 EO 4P W+2 -480 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
A.6 Lydia Luyten -Teresa Dekoster 42,86 %
16 EO 4C N = 420 1 7.14
17 EO 4C E+1 -450 7 50.00
18 EO 3S N-2 -200 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Yolande Waerseggers 41,67 %
19 EO 5T W+1 -620 5 35.71
20 EO 4C N-1 -100 12 85.71
21 EO 2S W = -120 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 63,39 %
22 EO 4P S = 420 2 14.29
23 EO 1S W+2 -150 3 21.43
24 EO 2C E-1 50 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
A.2 Hugo Baetens -Francis Rittweger 61,61 %
25 EO 4C S+1 450 2 14.29
26 EO 4C N-1 -100 3 21.43
27 EO 3S E-3 150 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
A.8 Helene Christiaens -Patrizia Vaccani 43,15 %
28 EO 3S N = 600 7 50.00
29 EO 1S W+2 -150 9 64.29
30 EO 4C N+1 450 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
A.9 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 43,75 %
34 EO 4P S-2 -200 14 100.00
35 EO 2P S-1 -50 7 50.00
36 EO 3C W-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 156,0 / 336 = 46,43 %
PAIRE a.4 Antoinette van Hoobrouck -Marie Claire Vienne
A.9 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 43,75 %
4 EO 4C S = 620 6 42.86
5 EO 3K N+4 190 7 50.00
6 EO 3T W+1 -130 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Diane Deslignes 48,81 %
10 EO 5P N = 650 6 42.86
11 EO 4P S = 420 0 0.00
12 EO 4P W = -420 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
A11 Christine Defraigne -Michele Berrier 56,85 %
13 EO 4C E+1 -650 13 92.86
14 EO 3T N+2 150 7 50.00
15 EO 2P E+3 -200 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
A.5 Patrick Gilles -Philippe van der Gracht 52,68 %
16 EO 3S S = 400 4 28.57
17 EO 4C E-1 50 1 7.14
18 EO 3S S = 600 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 19,05 %
A12 Annie Zeimes -Didier Collart 44,35 %
19 EO 5CcS-3 -500 0 0.00
20 EO 5T S-1 -100 12 85.71
21 EO 3S W-1 50 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.6 Lydia Luyten -Teresa Dekoster 42,86 %
22 EO 4P S = 420 2 14.29
23 EO 3K E = -110 0 0.00
24 EO 1S E = -90 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 63,39 %
28 EO 3S N = 600 7 50.00
29 EO 2S E+1 -150 9 64.29
30 EO 4C N = 420 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
A.8 Helene Christiaens -Patrizia Vaccani 43,15 %
34 EO 3P S = 140 5 35.71
35 EO 1S N-2 -100 13 92.86
36 EO 2C W+1 -140 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
Total : 147,0 / 336 = 43,75 %
PAIRE a.9 Diane Czarnocki -Christine Brouckaert
A11 Christine Defraigne -Michele Berrier 56,85 %
1 EO 4K E-1 50 1 7.14
2 EO 2K W+1 -110 6 42.86
3 EO 2K E-1 100 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A12 Annie Zeimes -Didier Collart 44,35 %
7 EO 2P N-1 -100 5 35.71
8 EO 2P N-1 -50 9 64.29
9 EO 4P W = -620 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Yolande Waerseggers 41,67 %
13 EO 4C E = -620 7 50.00
14 EO 2S S+3 210 4 28.57
15 EO 4P E = -420 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
A.2 Hugo Baetens -Francis Rittweger 61,61 %
19 EO 5T W+1 -620 5 35.71
20 EO 5T S = 600 6 42.86
21 EO 3S W-1 50 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
A.9 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 43,75 %
25 EO 4C S = 420 7 50.00
26 EO 3C S = 140 0 0.00
27 EO 3S E-6 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
A.4 Grazia Neuenschwander -Diane Deslignes 48,81 %
28 EO 3S N = 600 7 50.00
29 EO 1S W+1 -120 2 14.29
30 EO 4C N+1 450 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
A10 Francoise Duren -Giuseppe Napoli 57,14 %
31 EO 2T W-1 50 1 7.14
32 EO 4P S-2 -100 11 78.57
33 EO 4P N+1 450 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
A.5 Patrick Gilles -Philippe van der Gracht 52,68 %
34 EO 3P S = 140 5 35.71
35 EO 3P S-1 -50 7 50.00
36 EO 1S S-1 -100 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 120,0 / 336 = 35,71 %
|