B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 67,58 A14 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire
--- 2 64,30 A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Diane Deslignes
--- 3 57,90 A.9 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens
--- 4 55,21 A12 Patrick Gilles -Jean Marie Schmiliver
--- 5 53,75 A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia
--- 6 50,49 A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Philippe van der Gracht
--- 7 48,75 A.6 Sylviane Delbeke -Claire Destin
--- 8 48,33 A.3 Christine Defraigne -Michele Berrier
--- 9 45,83 A.8 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry
--- 10 45,68 A.5 Simone Munsterhjelm -Colette Heerinckx
--- 11 44,03 A.4 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe
--- 12 43,75 A10 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
--- 13 37,50 A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
--- 14 37,27 A13 Annie Zeimes -Jeannine Thys
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 57,46 a12 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels
--- 2 56,88 a.7 Serge Alard -Jean Chabotier
--- 3 54,75 a.8 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve
--- 4 54,45 a10 Liliane Baptista -Michel Paquot
--- 5 52,54 a.2 Marc Bauherz -Marc Goldbrenner
--- 6 52,31 a.1 Francine Dozin -Marie Claire Vienne
--- 7 51,55 a13 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot
--- 8 50,09 a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger
--- 9 49,37 a11 Diane Emsens -Cécile Drion de Chapois
--- 10 48,73 a.6 Lydia Luyten -Jean de Villenfagne
--- 11 47,58 a.5 Myriam de Timary -Stan Tabor
--- 12 44,70 a.4 Francoise Turin -Michel Lievens
--- 13 42,65 a14 Didier Collart -Gerard Cooreman
--- 14 37,39 a.9 Peter Masterson -Andre Delacroix
PAIRE A14 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire
a13 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 51,55 %
1 NS 1K N = 70 18 81.82
2 NS 5C S-2 -200 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a12 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 57,46 %
3 NS 3S W-1 100 19 86.36
4 NS 4P W+1 -650 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 63,18 %
a11 Diane Emsens -Cécile Drion de Chapois 49,37 %
5 NS 3S S = 600 8 36.36
6 NS 4C N = 420 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a10 Liliane Baptista -Michel Paquot 54,45 %
7 NS 3S E+3 -690 2 9.09
8 NS 4P S = 420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.9 Peter Masterson -Andre Delacroix 37,39 %
9 NS 2S N+1 150 17 77.27
10 NS 2S N+1 150 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
a.8 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 54,75 %
11 NS 3S E-1 50 20 90.91
12 NS 3S N = 600 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.6 Lydia Luyten -Jean de Villenfagne 48,73 %
13 NS 4C E+1 -650 16 72.73
14 NS 3P S+1 170 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a.5 Myriam de Timary -Stan Tabor 47,58 %
15 NS 1S E+1 -120 22 100.00
16 NS 5C E-1 100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
a.4 Francoise Turin -Michel Lievens 44,70 %
17 NS 5C W-2 100 18 81.82
18 NS 4C E = -420 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 50,09 %
19 NS 3S W = -600 13 59.09
20 NS 3S W-3 300 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
a.2 Marc Bauherz -Marc Goldbrenner 52,54 %
21 NS 4C N = 620 19 86.36
22 NS 5KcE-1 200 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
a14 Didier Collart -Gerard Cooreman 42,65 %
27 NS 2S W-3 150 16 72.73
28 NS 5T E-1 50 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
Total : 356,8 / 528 = 67,58 %
PAIRE A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Diane Deslignes
a.7 Serge Alard -Jean Chabotier 56,88 %
1 NS 1S N+1 120 22 100.00
2 NS 4C S = 620 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 100,00 %
a.6 Lydia Luyten -Jean de Villenfagne 48,73 %
3 NS 1S W+1 -120 10 45.45
4 NS 4P W+1 -650 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
a.5 Myriam de Timary -Stan Tabor 47,58 %
5 NS 3S S+1 630 19 86.36
6 NS 4C N-1 -50 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 50,09 %
7 NS 3S E+2 -660 10 45.45
8 NS 4P N = 420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.2 Marc Bauherz -Marc Goldbrenner 52,54 %
9 NS 1S W-2 200 21 95.45
10 NS 2P S = 110 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
a.1 Francine Dozin -Marie Claire Vienne 52,31 %
11 NS 2C E+1 -140 16 72.73
12 NS 3S N = 600 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a14 Didier Collart -Gerard Cooreman 42,65 %
13 NS 4K W-1 100 22 100.00
14 NS 5TcE-5 1100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 100,00 %
a13 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 51,55 %
15 NS 4C E = -420 6 27.27
16 NS 4C E = -620 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a11 Diane Emsens -Cécile Drion de Chapois 49,37 %
21 NS 3C N+2 200 10 45.45
22 NS 5T S-1 -50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a10 Liliane Baptista -Michel Paquot 54,45 %
23 NS 2C N+2 170 19.7 89.55
24 NS 3S S = 400 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 94,77 %
a.9 Peter Masterson -Andre Delacroix 37,39 %
25 NS 3K N-2 -100 15 68.18
26 NS 3S N+1 630 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.8 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 54,75 %
27 NS 2P N-1 -50 0 0.00
28 NS 5TcE-1 100 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
Total : 339,5 / 528 = 64,30 %
PAIRE A.9 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 50,09 %
1 NS 2C E-1 50 14 63.64
2 NS 4C S-1 -100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.1 Francine Dozin -Marie Claire Vienne 52,31 %
3 NS 4C E-1 100 19 86.36
4 NS 4P W+1 -650 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 63,18 %
a14 Didier Collart -Gerard Cooreman 42,65 %
5 NS 3S S+1 630 19 86.36
6 NS 2C S+2 170 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
a13 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 51,55 %
7 NS 4K W+1 -150 19 86.36
8 NS 4P S = 420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a12 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 57,46 %
9 NS 2T S = 90 1 4.55
10 NS 3P S-1 -100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
a11 Diane Emsens -Cécile Drion de Chapois 49,37 %
11 NS 3S E = -400 8 36.36
12 NS 3S S+1 630 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.9 Peter Masterson -Andre Delacroix 37,39 %
17 NS 4C W-1 50 14 63.64
18 NS 3C E+2 -200 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.8 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 54,75 %
19 NS 4P E-2 200 21 95.45
20 NS 2T W = -90 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
a.7 Serge Alard -Jean Chabotier 56,88 %
21 NS 5T E-4 200 10 45.45
22 NS 5T S-2 -100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a.6 Lydia Luyten -Jean de Villenfagne 48,73 %
23 NS 4P W-2 200 21.9 99.55
24 NS 2K S+1 110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 49,77 %
a.5 Myriam de Timary -Stan Tabor 47,58 %
25 NS 5CcW-1 200 22 100.00
26 NS 3S N+1 630 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
a.4 Francoise Turin -Michel Lievens 44,70 %
27 NS 2P N+1 140 11 50.00
28 NS 4P N-1 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 305,7 / 528 = 57,90 %
PAIRE A12 Patrick Gilles -Jean Marie Schmiliver
a.9 Peter Masterson -Andre Delacroix 37,39 %
1 NS 3S W-2 100 20 90.91
2 NS 3P E-1 50 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a.8 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 54,75 %
3 NS 3PcN-4 -800 0 0.00
4 NS 3P W+2 -200 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 44,77 %
a.7 Serge Alard -Jean Chabotier 56,88 %
5 NS 3S N+1 630 19 86.36
6 NS 4C N-1 -50 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.6 Lydia Luyten -Jean de Villenfagne 48,73 %
7 NS 3S E+2 -660 10 45.45
8 NS 4P S = 420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.4 Francoise Turin -Michel Lievens 44,70 %
9 NS 2S S+1 150 17 77.27
10 NS 3P S = 140 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 50,09 %
11 NS 3S E+2 -460 0 0.00
12 NS 4P S+2 680 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.2 Marc Bauherz -Marc Goldbrenner 52,54 %
13 NS 4C E+2 -680 7 31.82
14 NS 4P N+1 450 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.1 Francine Dozin -Marie Claire Vienne 52,31 %
15 NS 4C E = -420 6 27.27
16 NS 5CcE-1 200 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a14 Didier Collart -Gerard Cooreman 42,65 %
17 NS 5TcS-2 -300 8 36.36
18 NS 3C E+1 -170 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a12 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 57,46 %
23 NS 3C N-1 -100 8.8 40.00
24 NS 1S S+2 150 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a11 Diane Emsens -Cécile Drion de Chapois 49,37 %
25 NS 2S W-1 100 19 86.36
26 NS 3C N+1 170 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a10 Liliane Baptista -Michel Paquot 54,45 %
27 NS 2P N = 110 5 22.73
28 NS 4P N-1 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
Total : 291,5 / 528 = 55,21 %
PAIRE A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia
a12 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 57,46 %
1 NS 2C E = -110 5 22.73
2 NS 4C S-1 -100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a11 Diane Emsens -Cécile Drion de Chapois 49,37 %
3 NS 2P N-2 -100 14 63.64
4 NS 50%50% Ajust 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a10 Liliane Baptista -Michel Paquot 54,45 %
5 NS 3S S = 600 8 36.36
6 NS 5C N-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
a.9 Peter Masterson -Andre Delacroix 37,39 %
7 NS 3S E+2 -660 10 45.45
8 NS 4P S = 420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.7 Serge Alard -Jean Chabotier 56,88 %
13 NS 6C E = -1430 0 0.00
14 NS 3P S+1 170 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.6 Lydia Luyten -Jean de Villenfagne 48,73 %
15 NS 3C E+1 -170 17 77.27
16 NS 4PcN-1 -100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a.5 Myriam de Timary -Stan Tabor 47,58 %
17 NS 5C W-3 150 22 100.00
18 NS 3C E+1 -170 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
a.4 Francoise Turin -Michel Lievens 44,70 %
19 NS 4P E-2 200 21 95.45
20 NS 2S W-1 100 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 50,09 %
21 NS 5TcE-3 500 16 72.73
22 NS 4P W-1 100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a.2 Marc Bauherz -Marc Goldbrenner 52,54 %
23 NS 3C N-1 -100 8.8 40.00
24 NS 1S S+2 150 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.1 Francine Dozin -Marie Claire Vienne 52,31 %
25 NS 3C E+1 -170 8 36.36
26 NS 2S S+3 210 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a13 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 51,55 %
27 NS 3C W-3 150 16 72.73
28 NS 4P N-1 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
Total : 283,8 / 528 = 53,75 %
PAIRE A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Philippe van der Gracht
a.2 Marc Bauherz -Marc Goldbrenner 52,54 %
3 NS 1S W+2 -150 6 27.27
4 NS 4P W+1 -650 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 33,64 %
a.1 Francine Dozin -Marie Claire Vienne 52,31 %
5 NS 5KcN-1 -200 0 0.00
6 NS 4C N-1 -50 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
a14 Didier Collart -Gerard Cooreman 42,65 %
7 NS 4K W+1 -150 19 86.36
8 NS 4P S = 420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a13 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 51,55 %
9 NS 1S W-1 100 7 31.82
10 NS 4P S-1 -100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a12 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 57,46 %
11 NS 2K E+3 -150 13 59.09
12 NS 3S S = 600 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a11 Diane Emsens -Cécile Drion de Chapois 49,37 %
13 NS 4C E+1 -650 16 72.73
14 NS 2P S+1 140 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a10 Liliane Baptista -Michel Paquot 54,45 %
15 NS 4C E+1 -450 0 0.00
16 NS 5CcE-1 200 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.8 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 54,75 %
17 NS 5P E-1 50 14 63.64
18 NS 1S W-1 50 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
a.7 Serge Alard -Jean Chabotier 56,88 %
19 NS 3S W+1 -630 5 22.73
20 NS 2S W-1 100 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.6 Lydia Luyten -Jean de Villenfagne 48,73 %
21 NS 4C N = 620 19 86.36
22 NS 4K E = -130 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.5 Myriam de Timary -Stan Tabor 47,58 %
23 NS 3C N-1 -100 8.8 40.00
24 NS 2S S+1 150 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.4 Francoise Turin -Michel Lievens 44,70 %
25 NS 4C E-1 100 19 86.36
26 NS 3S S+2 660 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
Total : 266,6 / 528 = 50,49 %
PAIRE A.6 Sylviane Delbeke -Claire Destin
a10 Liliane Baptista -Michel Paquot 54,45 %
1 NS 1C E = -80 10 45.45
2 NS 3C S = 140 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a.9 Peter Masterson -Andre Delacroix 37,39 %
3 NS 2S W-1 100 19 86.36
4 NS 4P W+2 -680 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 43,41 %
a.8 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 54,75 %
5 NS 3S S = 600 8 36.36
6 NS 2C S+1 140 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.6 Lydia Luyten -Jean de Villenfagne 48,73 %
11 NS 3S E-1 50 20 90.91
12 NS 4P S-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.5 Myriam de Timary -Stan Tabor 47,58 %
13 NS 4C E+2 -680 7 31.82
14 NS 3P S = 140 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.4 Francoise Turin -Michel Lievens 44,70 %
15 NS 3C E+2 -200 12 54.55
16 NS 4P N-2 -100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 50,09 %
17 NS 4C W = -420 3 13.64
18 NS 4C E = -420 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
a.2 Marc Bauherz -Marc Goldbrenner 52,54 %
19 NS 3S W+1 -630 5 22.73
20 NS 1S W = -90 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.1 Francine Dozin -Marie Claire Vienne 52,31 %
21 NS 4P W-5 250 14 63.64
22 NS 5P W-1 100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a14 Didier Collart -Gerard Cooreman 42,65 %
23 NS 3P W-1 100 14.3 65.00
24 NS 1S S+2 150 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a12 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 57,46 %
25 NS 4C W = -620 3 13.64
26 NS 3S N+1 630 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a11 Diane Emsens -Cécile Drion de Chapois 49,37 %
27 NS 1S S+3 180 22 100.00
28 NS 4P N-1 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
Total : 257,4 / 528 = 48,75 %
PAIRE A.3 Christine Defraigne -Michele Berrier
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 50,09 %
5 NS 3S S = 600 8 36.36
6 NS 4C N = 420 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a.2 Marc Bauherz -Marc Goldbrenner 52,54 %
7 NS 3S E+2 -660 10 45.45
8 NS 4P S = 420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.1 Francine Dozin -Marie Claire Vienne 52,31 %
9 NS 1P E-1 100 7 31.82
10 NS 3P S = 140 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a14 Didier Collart -Gerard Cooreman 42,65 %
11 NS 5K E+2 -440 4 18.18
12 NS 3S N = 600 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a13 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 51,55 %
13 NS 4C E+3 -710 2 9.09
14 NS 4P S = 420 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a12 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 57,46 %
15 NS 4C E = -420 6 27.27
16 NS 4C E = -620 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a11 Diane Emsens -Cécile Drion de Chapois 49,37 %
17 NS 4C E-1 50 14 63.64
18 NS 4C E = -420 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.9 Peter Masterson -Andre Delacroix 37,39 %
19 NS 3S W-1 100 18 81.82
20 NS 2S W+1 -150 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.8 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 54,75 %
21 NS 3C N+1 170 6 27.27
22 NS 4T S = 130 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.7 Serge Alard -Jean Chabotier 56,88 %
23 NS 60%60% Ajust 13.2 60.00
24 NS 1S S+2 150 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.6 Lydia Luyten -Jean de Villenfagne 48,73 %
25 NS 5KcN-4 -800 0 0.00
26 NS 3S N+2 660 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.5 Myriam de Timary -Stan Tabor 47,58 %
27 NS 2P N = 110 5 22.73
28 NS 5TcE-1 100 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
Total : 255,2 / 528 = 48,33 %
PAIRE A.8 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry
a14 Didier Collart -Gerard Cooreman 42,65 %
1 NS 3C E-1 50 14 63.64
2 NS 4PcE-2 300 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a13 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 51,55 %
3 NS 4C E-1 100 19 86.36
4 NS 4P W+1 -650 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 63,18 %
a12 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 57,46 %
5 NS 3S S+1 630 19 86.36
6 NS 3C N = 140 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a11 Diane Emsens -Cécile Drion de Chapois 49,37 %
7 NS 3S W+2 -660 10 45.45
8 NS 4P N = 420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a10 Liliane Baptista -Michel Paquot 54,45 %
9 NS 1S W-2 200 21 95.45
10 NS 4P S-1 -100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a.8 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 54,75 %
15 NS 4C E = -420 6 27.27
16 NS 4C E = -620 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a.7 Serge Alard -Jean Chabotier 56,88 %
17 NS 5TcN-1 -100 10 45.45
18 NS 4C E = -420 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a.6 Lydia Luyten -Jean de Villenfagne 48,73 %
19 NS 3S W = -600 13 59.09
20 NS 2T W+1 -110 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.5 Myriam de Timary -Stan Tabor 47,58 %
21 NS 5T E-2 100 2 9.09
22 NS 5T S-2 -100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
a.4 Francoise Turin -Michel Lievens 44,70 %
23 NS 3C N-2 -200 1.2 5.45
24 NS 1S S+2 150 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 50,09 %
25 NS 4K N-2 -100 15 68.18
26 NS 3C N+1 170 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.2 Marc Bauherz -Marc Goldbrenner 52,54 %
27 NS 2P N+1 140 11 50.00
28 NS 5P N-2 -200 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
Total : 242,0 / 528 = 45,83 %
PAIRE A.5 Simone Munsterhjelm -Colette Heerinckx
a.8 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 54,75 %
1 NS 2C E = -110 5 22.73
2 NS 4C S-1 -100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.7 Serge Alard -Jean Chabotier 56,88 %
3 NS 3S W+1 -630 2 9.09
4 NS 4S E-2 200 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 54,32 %
a.5 Myriam de Timary -Stan Tabor 47,58 %
9 NS 2S N = 120 14 63.64
10 NS 3P S-1 -100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.4 Francoise Turin -Michel Lievens 44,70 %
11 NS 3K E+2 -150 13 59.09
12 NS 2S S+1 150 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 50,09 %
13 NS 4C E+1 -650 16 72.73
14 NS 3P S = 140 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.2 Marc Bauherz -Marc Goldbrenner 52,54 %
15 NS 3C E+1 -170 17 77.27
16 NS 4C E = -620 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.1 Francine Dozin -Marie Claire Vienne 52,31 %
17 NS 4C W = -420 3 13.64
18 NS 3C E+1 -170 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a14 Didier Collart -Gerard Cooreman 42,65 %
19 NS 3S W+1 -630 5 22.73
20 NS 2S W+1 -150 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
a13 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 51,55 %
21 NS 3C N+2 200 10 45.45
22 NS 5T S-1 -50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a11 Diane Emsens -Cécile Drion de Chapois 49,37 %
23 NS 3P W-1 100 14.3 65.00
24 NS 1S S+3 180 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 77,95 %
a10 Liliane Baptista -Michel Paquot 54,45 %
25 NS 2C W+2 -170 8 36.36
26 NS 2C N+3 200 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a.9 Peter Masterson -Andre Delacroix 37,39 %
27 NS 2P N+2 170 20 90.91
28 NS 5P N-1 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
Total : 241,2 / 528 = 45,68 %
PAIRE A.4 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe
a.6 Lydia Luyten -Jean de Villenfagne 48,73 %
1 NS 2C E-1 50 14 63.64
2 NS 4P E-2 100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.4 Francoise Turin -Michel Lievens 44,70 %
7 NS 5K E = -600 16 72.73
8 NS 4P N = 420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 50,09 %
9 NS 1S W-1 100 7 31.82
10 NS 2C E-1 100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.2 Marc Bauherz -Marc Goldbrenner 52,54 %
11 NS 5K E+1 -420 6 27.27
12 NS 3S S = 600 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.1 Francine Dozin -Marie Claire Vienne 52,31 %
13 NS 4C E+1 -650 16 72.73
14 NS 2P S+1 140 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a14 Didier Collart -Gerard Cooreman 42,65 %
15 NS 3C E+1 -170 17 77.27
16 NS 4C E = -620 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a13 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 51,55 %
17 NS 3T N = 110 20 90.91
18 NS 4C E = -420 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a12 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 57,46 %
19 NS 3S W = -600 13 59.09
20 NS 2T W+1 -110 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a10 Liliane Baptista -Michel Paquot 54,45 %
21 NS 4T E-2 100 2 9.09
22 NS 6TcS-2 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 4,55 %
a.9 Peter Masterson -Andre Delacroix 37,39 %
23 NS 2C N = 110 17.5 79.55
24 NS 1S S+2 150 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a.8 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 54,75 %
25 NS 2C W+1 -140 12 54.55
26 NS 3K S+2 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.7 Serge Alard -Jean Chabotier 56,88 %
27 NS 2P N = 110 5 22.73
28 NS 5P N-2 -200 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
Total : 232,5 / 528 = 44,03 %
PAIRE A10 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
a.5 Myriam de Timary -Stan Tabor 47,58 %
1 NS 2C E+1 -140 0 0.00
2 NS 3P E-1 50 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a.4 Francoise Turin -Michel Lievens 44,70 %
3 NS 1S W+2 -150 6 27.27
4 NS 4P W+1 -650 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 33,64 %
a.2 Marc Bauherz -Marc Goldbrenner 52,54 %
5 NS 3S S = 600 8 36.36
6 NS 4C S-1 -50 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a.1 Francine Dozin -Marie Claire Vienne 52,31 %
7 NS 5S E-1 100 22 100.00
8 NS 4P S+1 450 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 100,00 %
a14 Didier Collart -Gerard Cooreman 42,65 %
9 NS 2K N = 90 1 4.55
10 NS 4P S-1 -100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
a13 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 51,55 %
11 NS 2K E+4 -170 10 45.45
12 NS 3S S = 600 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a12 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 57,46 %
13 NS 4C E+2 -680 7 31.82
14 NS 3P S+1 170 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a10 Liliane Baptista -Michel Paquot 54,45 %
19 NS 3S W = -600 13 59.09
20 NS 4T W = -130 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.9 Peter Masterson -Andre Delacroix 37,39 %
21 NS 4CcN = 790 22 100.00
22 NS 4TcS = 510 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 100,00 %
a.8 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 54,75 %
23 NS 3C N-2 -200 1.2 5.45
24 NS 2S N = 120 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 7,27 %
a.7 Serge Alard -Jean Chabotier 56,88 %
25 NS 4C W = -620 3 13.64
26 NS 3S N+1 630 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.6 Lydia Luyten -Jean de Villenfagne 48,73 %
27 NS 2P N = 110 5 22.73
28 NS 4P N-1 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
Total : 231,0 / 528 = 43,75 %
PAIRE A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
a.1 Francine Dozin -Marie Claire Vienne 52,31 %
1 NS 2C E = -110 5 22.73
2 NS 5CcS-2 -500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
a14 Didier Collart -Gerard Cooreman 42,65 %
3 NS 1S W+2 -150 6 27.27
4 NS 4P W = -620 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 53,41 %
a13 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 51,55 %
5 NS 3S S = 600 8 36.36
6 NS 1C S+3 170 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a12 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 57,46 %
7 NS 3S E+3 -690 2 9.09
8 NS 4P S = 420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a11 Diane Emsens -Cécile Drion de Chapois 49,37 %
9 NS 1S W-1 100 7 31.82
10 NS 4P S-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
a10 Liliane Baptista -Michel Paquot 54,45 %
11 NS 3S E-1 50 20 90.91
12 NS 3S S = 600 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.9 Peter Masterson -Andre Delacroix 37,39 %
13 NS 5C W+1 -680 7 31.82
14 NS 2P S+3 200 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.7 Serge Alard -Jean Chabotier 56,88 %
15 NS 4C E = -420 6 27.27
16 NS 4C E+1 -650 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
a.6 Lydia Luyten -Jean de Villenfagne 48,73 %
17 NS 4C W = -420 3 13.64
18 NS 3C E+1 -170 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.5 Myriam de Timary -Stan Tabor 47,58 %
19 NS 3S W+1 -630 5 22.73
20 NS 2T W = -90 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.4 Francoise Turin -Michel Lievens 44,70 %
21 NS 4T E-2 100 2 9.09
22 NS 5T S-1 -50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 50,09 %
23 NS 2P W = -110 4.5 20.45
24 NS 2S S+1 150 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
Total : 198,0 / 528 = 37,50 %
PAIRE A13 Annie Zeimes -Jeannine Thys
a11 Diane Emsens -Cécile Drion de Chapois 49,37 %
1 NS 2C E = -110 5 22.73
2 NS 4C S-1 -100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a10 Liliane Baptista -Michel Paquot 54,45 %
3 NS 2C E = -110 12 54.55
4 NS 4P W+1 -650 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 47,27 %
a.9 Peter Masterson -Andre Delacroix 37,39 %
5 NS 3S S = 600 8 36.36
6 NS 2T S+2 130 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.8 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 54,75 %
7 NS 3S E+3 -690 2 9.09
8 NS 4P S = 420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.7 Serge Alard -Jean Chabotier 56,88 %
9 NS 3K N = 110 12 54.55
10 NS 3P S-1 -100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.5 Myriam de Timary -Stan Tabor 47,58 %
11 NS 4P W+1 -450 2 9.09
12 NS 3S N+1 630 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.4 Francoise Turin -Michel Lievens 44,70 %
13 NS 4C E+1 -650 16 72.73
14 NS 3K S+2 150 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 50,09 %
15 NS 3C E+1 -170 17 77.27
16 NS 4C E = -620 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.2 Marc Bauherz -Marc Goldbrenner 52,54 %
17 NS 4C E = -420 3 13.64
18 NS 4C E = -420 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
a.1 Francine Dozin -Marie Claire Vienne 52,31 %
19 NS 4P E+1 -650 0 0.00
20 NS 2T W+2 -130 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
a13 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 51,55 %
25 NS 3C W+1 -170 8 36.36
26 NS 2C N+3 200 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a12 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels 57,46 %
27 NS 3C W-3 150 16 72.73
28 NS 5P N-2 -200 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
Total : 196,8 / 528 = 37,27 %
PAIRE a12 Daniel Couvreur -Luc Cartuyvels
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia 53,75 %
1 EO 2C E = -110 17 77.27
2 EO 4C S-1 -100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A14 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 67,58 %
3 EO 3S W-1 100 3 13.64
4 EO 4P W+1 -650 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 36,82 %
A.8 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry 45,83 %
5 EO 3S S+1 630 3 13.64
6 EO 3C N = 140 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 37,50 %
7 EO 3S E+3 -690 20 90.91
8 EO 4P S = 420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.9 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 57,90 %
9 EO 2T S = 90 21 95.45
10 EO 3P S-1 -100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Philippe van der Gracht 50,49 %
11 EO 2K E+3 -150 9 40.91
12 EO 3S S = 600 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A10 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 43,75 %
13 EO 4C E+2 -680 15 68.18
14 EO 3P S+1 170 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.3 Christine Defraigne -Michele Berrier 48,33 %
15 EO 4C E = -420 16 72.73
16 EO 4C E = -620 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A.4 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 44,03 %
19 EO 3S W = -600 9 40.91
20 EO 2T W+1 -110 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A12 Patrick Gilles -Jean Marie Schmiliver 55,21 %
23 EO 3C N-1 -100 13.2 60.00
24 EO 1S S+2 150 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.6 Sylviane Delbeke -Claire Destin 48,75 %
25 EO 4C W = -620 19 86.36
26 EO 3S N+1 630 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Jeannine Thys 37,27 %
27 EO 3C W-3 150 6 27.27
28 EO 5P N-2 -200 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
Total : 303,4 / 528 = 57,46 %
PAIRE a.7 Serge Alard -Jean Chabotier
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Diane Deslignes 64,30 %
1 EO 1S N+1 120 0 0.00
2 EO 4C S = 620 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.5 Simone Munsterhjelm -Colette Heerinckx 45,68 %
3 EO 3S W+1 -630 20 90.91
4 EO 4S E-2 200 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 45,68 %
A12 Patrick Gilles -Jean Marie Schmiliver 55,21 %
5 EO 3S N+1 630 3 13.64
6 EO 4C N-1 -50 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Jeannine Thys 37,27 %
9 EO 3K N = 110 10 45.45
10 EO 3P S-1 -100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia 53,75 %
13 EO 6C E = -1430 22 100.00
14 EO 3P S+1 170 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 37,50 %
15 EO 4C E = -420 16 72.73
16 EO 4C E+1 -650 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
A.8 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry 45,83 %
17 EO 5TcN-1 -100 12 54.55
18 EO 4C E = -420 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Philippe van der Gracht 50,49 %
19 EO 3S W+1 -630 17 77.27
20 EO 2S W-1 100 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.9 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 57,90 %
21 EO 5T E-4 200 12 54.55
22 EO 5T S-2 -100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A.3 Christine Defraigne -Michele Berrier 48,33 %
23 EO 60%60% Ajust 13.2 60.00
24 EO 1S S+2 150 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A10 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 43,75 %
25 EO 4C W = -620 19 86.36
26 EO 3S N+1 630 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.4 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 44,03 %
27 EO 2P N = 110 17 77.27
28 EO 5P N-2 -200 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
Total : 300,3 / 528 = 56,88 %
PAIRE a.8 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve
A.5 Simone Munsterhjelm -Colette Heerinckx 45,68 %
1 EO 2C E = -110 17 77.27
2 EO 4C S-1 -100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A12 Patrick Gilles -Jean Marie Schmiliver 55,21 %
3 EO 3PcN-4 -800 22 100.00
4 EO 3P W+2 -200 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 55,23 %
A.6 Sylviane Delbeke -Claire Destin 48,75 %
5 EO 3S S = 600 14 63.64
6 EO 2C S+1 140 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Jeannine Thys 37,27 %
7 EO 3S E+3 -690 20 90.91
8 EO 4P S = 420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A14 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 67,58 %
11 EO 3S E-1 50 2 9.09
12 EO 3S N = 600 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.8 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry 45,83 %
15 EO 4C E = -420 16 72.73
16 EO 4C E = -620 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Philippe van der Gracht 50,49 %
17 EO 5P E-1 50 8 36.36
18 EO 1S W-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
A.9 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 57,90 %
19 EO 4P E-2 200 1 4.55
20 EO 2T W = -90 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
A.3 Christine Defraigne -Michele Berrier 48,33 %
21 EO 3C N+1 170 16 72.73
22 EO 4T S = 130 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A10 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 43,75 %
23 EO 3C N-2 -200 20.8 94.55
24 EO 2S N = 120 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 92,73 %
A.4 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 44,03 %
25 EO 2C W+1 -140 10 45.45
26 EO 3K S+2 150 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Diane Deslignes 64,30 %
27 EO 2P N-1 -50 22 100.00
28 EO 5TcE-1 100 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
Total : 289,1 / 528 = 54,75 %
PAIRE a10 Liliane Baptista -Michel Paquot
A.6 Sylviane Delbeke -Claire Destin 48,75 %
1 EO 1C E = -80 12 54.55
2 EO 3C S = 140 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Jeannine Thys 37,27 %
3 EO 2C E = -110 10 45.45
4 EO 4P W+1 -650 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 52,73 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia 53,75 %
5 EO 3S S = 600 14 63.64
6 EO 5C N-2 -100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
A14 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 67,58 %
7 EO 3S E+3 -690 20 90.91
8 EO 4P S = 420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.8 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry 45,83 %
9 EO 1S W-2 200 1 4.55
10 EO 4P S-1 -100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 37,50 %
11 EO 3S E-1 50 2 9.09
12 EO 3S S = 600 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Philippe van der Gracht 50,49 %
15 EO 4C E+1 -450 22 100.00
16 EO 5CcE-1 200 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A10 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 43,75 %
19 EO 3S W = -600 9 40.91
20 EO 4T W = -130 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.4 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 44,03 %
21 EO 4T E-2 100 20 90.91
22 EO 6TcS-2 -300 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 95,45 %
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Diane Deslignes 64,30 %
23 EO 2C N+2 170 2.3 10.45
24 EO 3S S = 400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 5,23 %
A.5 Simone Munsterhjelm -Colette Heerinckx 45,68 %
25 EO 2C W+2 -170 14 63.64
26 EO 2C N+3 200 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A12 Patrick Gilles -Jean Marie Schmiliver 55,21 %
27 EO 2P N = 110 17 77.27
28 EO 4P N-1 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
Total : 287,5 / 528 = 54,45 %
PAIRE a.2 Marc Bauherz -Marc Goldbrenner
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Philippe van der Gracht 50,49 %
3 EO 1S W+2 -150 16 72.73
4 EO 4P W+1 -650 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 66,36 %
A10 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 43,75 %
5 EO 3S S = 600 14 63.64
6 EO 4C S-1 -50 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A.3 Christine Defraigne -Michele Berrier 48,33 %
7 EO 3S E+2 -660 12 54.55
8 EO 4P S = 420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Diane Deslignes 64,30 %
9 EO 1S W-2 200 1 4.55
10 EO 2P S = 110 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
A.4 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 44,03 %
11 EO 5K E+1 -420 16 72.73
12 EO 3S S = 600 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A12 Patrick Gilles -Jean Marie Schmiliver 55,21 %
13 EO 4C E+2 -680 15 68.18
14 EO 4P N+1 450 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.5 Simone Munsterhjelm -Colette Heerinckx 45,68 %
15 EO 3C E+1 -170 5 22.73
16 EO 4C E = -620 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Jeannine Thys 37,27 %
17 EO 4C E = -420 19 86.36
18 EO 4C E = -420 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
A.6 Sylviane Delbeke -Claire Destin 48,75 %
19 EO 3S W+1 -630 17 77.27
20 EO 1S W = -90 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A14 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 67,58 %
21 EO 4C N = 620 3 13.64
22 EO 5KcE-1 200 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia 53,75 %
23 EO 3C N-1 -100 13.2 60.00
24 EO 1S S+2 150 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.8 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry 45,83 %
27 EO 2P N+1 140 11 50.00
28 EO 5P N-2 -200 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
Total : 277,4 / 528 = 52,54 %
PAIRE a.1 Francine Dozin -Marie Claire Vienne
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 37,50 %
1 EO 2C E = -110 17 77.27
2 EO 5CcS-2 -500 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
A.9 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 57,90 %
3 EO 4C E-1 100 3 13.64
4 EO 4P W+1 -650 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 36,82 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Philippe van der Gracht 50,49 %
5 EO 5KcN-1 -200 22 100.00
6 EO 4C N-1 -50 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
A10 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 43,75 %
7 EO 5S E-1 100 0 0.00
8 EO 4P S+1 450 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.3 Christine Defraigne -Michele Berrier 48,33 %
9 EO 1P E-1 100 15 68.18
10 EO 3P S = 140 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Diane Deslignes 64,30 %
11 EO 2C E+1 -140 6 27.27
12 EO 3S N = 600 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.4 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 44,03 %
13 EO 4C E+1 -650 6 27.27
14 EO 2P S+1 140 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A12 Patrick Gilles -Jean Marie Schmiliver 55,21 %
15 EO 4C E = -420 16 72.73
16 EO 5CcE-1 200 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.5 Simone Munsterhjelm -Colette Heerinckx 45,68 %
17 EO 4C W = -420 19 86.36
18 EO 3C E+1 -170 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Jeannine Thys 37,27 %
19 EO 4P E+1 -650 22 100.00
20 EO 2T W+2 -130 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
A.6 Sylviane Delbeke -Claire Destin 48,75 %
21 EO 4P W-5 250 8 36.36
22 EO 5P W-1 100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia 53,75 %
25 EO 3C E+1 -170 14 63.64
26 EO 2S S+3 210 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
Total : 276,2 / 528 = 52,31 %
PAIRE a13 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot
A14 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 67,58 %
1 EO 1K N = 70 4 18.18
2 EO 5C S-2 -200 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.8 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry 45,83 %
3 EO 4C E-1 100 3 13.64
4 EO 4P W+1 -650 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 36,82 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 37,50 %
5 EO 3S S = 600 14 63.64
6 EO 1C S+3 170 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A.9 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 57,90 %
7 EO 4K W+1 -150 3 13.64
8 EO 4P S = 420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Philippe van der Gracht 50,49 %
9 EO 1S W-1 100 15 68.18
10 EO 4P S-1 -100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A10 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 43,75 %
11 EO 2K E+4 -170 12 54.55
12 EO 3S S = 600 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.3 Christine Defraigne -Michele Berrier 48,33 %
13 EO 4C E+3 -710 20 90.91
14 EO 4P S = 420 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Diane Deslignes 64,30 %
15 EO 4C E = -420 16 72.73
16 EO 4C E = -620 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A.4 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 44,03 %
17 EO 3T N = 110 2 9.09
18 EO 4C E = -420 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A.5 Simone Munsterhjelm -Colette Heerinckx 45,68 %
21 EO 3C N+2 200 12 54.55
22 EO 5T S-1 -50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Jeannine Thys 37,27 %
25 EO 3C W+1 -170 14 63.64
26 EO 2C N+3 200 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia 53,75 %
27 EO 3C W-3 150 6 27.27
28 EO 4P N-1 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
Total : 272,2 / 528 = 51,55 %
PAIRE a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger
A.9 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 57,90 %
1 EO 2C E-1 50 8 36.36
2 EO 4C S-1 -100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.3 Christine Defraigne -Michele Berrier 48,33 %
5 EO 3S S = 600 14 63.64
6 EO 4C N = 420 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Diane Deslignes 64,30 %
7 EO 3S E+2 -660 12 54.55
8 EO 4P N = 420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.4 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 44,03 %
9 EO 1S W-1 100 15 68.18
10 EO 2C E-1 100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A12 Patrick Gilles -Jean Marie Schmiliver 55,21 %
11 EO 3S E+2 -460 22 100.00
12 EO 4P S+2 680 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.5 Simone Munsterhjelm -Colette Heerinckx 45,68 %
13 EO 4C E+1 -650 6 27.27
14 EO 3P S = 140 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Jeannine Thys 37,27 %
15 EO 3C E+1 -170 5 22.73
16 EO 4C E = -620 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.6 Sylviane Delbeke -Claire Destin 48,75 %
17 EO 4C W = -420 19 86.36
18 EO 4C E = -420 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
A14 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 67,58 %
19 EO 3S W = -600 9 40.91
20 EO 3S W-3 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia 53,75 %
21 EO 5TcE-3 500 6 27.27
22 EO 4P W-1 100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 37,50 %
23 EO 2P W = -110 17.5 79.55
24 EO 2S S+1 150 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A.8 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry 45,83 %
25 EO 4K N-2 -100 7 31.82
26 EO 3C N+1 170 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
Total : 264,5 / 528 = 50,09 %
PAIRE a11 Diane Emsens -Cécile Drion de Chapois
A13 Annie Zeimes -Jeannine Thys 37,27 %
1 EO 2C E = -110 17 77.27
2 EO 4C S-1 -100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia 53,75 %
3 EO 2P N-2 -100 8 36.36
4 EO 50%50% Ajust 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A14 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 67,58 %
5 EO 3S S = 600 14 63.64
6 EO 4C N = 420 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.8 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry 45,83 %
7 EO 3S W+2 -660 12 54.55
8 EO 4P N = 420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 37,50 %
9 EO 1S W-1 100 15 68.18
10 EO 4P S-2 -200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
A.9 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 57,90 %
11 EO 3S E = -400 14 63.64
12 EO 3S S+1 630 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Philippe van der Gracht 50,49 %
13 EO 4C E+1 -650 6 27.27
14 EO 2P S+1 140 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.3 Christine Defraigne -Michele Berrier 48,33 %
17 EO 4C E-1 50 8 36.36
18 EO 4C E = -420 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Diane Deslignes 64,30 %
21 EO 3C N+2 200 12 54.55
22 EO 5T S-1 -50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.5 Simone Munsterhjelm -Colette Heerinckx 45,68 %
23 EO 3P W-1 100 7.7 35.00
24 EO 1S S+3 180 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 22,05 %
A12 Patrick Gilles -Jean Marie Schmiliver 55,21 %
25 EO 2S W-1 100 3 13.64
26 EO 3C N+1 170 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.6 Sylviane Delbeke -Claire Destin 48,75 %
27 EO 1S S+3 180 0 0.00
28 EO 4P N-1 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
Total : 260,7 / 528 = 49,37 %
PAIRE a.6 Lydia Luyten -Jean de Villenfagne
A.4 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 44,03 %
1 EO 2C E-1 50 8 36.36
2 EO 4P E-2 100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Diane Deslignes 64,30 %
3 EO 1S W+1 -120 12 54.55
4 EO 4P W+1 -650 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
A12 Patrick Gilles -Jean Marie Schmiliver 55,21 %
7 EO 3S E+2 -660 12 54.55
8 EO 4P S = 420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.6 Sylviane Delbeke -Claire Destin 48,75 %
11 EO 3S E-1 50 2 9.09
12 EO 4P S-2 -200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A14 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 67,58 %
13 EO 4C E+1 -650 6 27.27
14 EO 3P S+1 170 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia 53,75 %
15 EO 3C E+1 -170 5 22.73
16 EO 4PcN-1 -100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 37,50 %
17 EO 4C W = -420 19 86.36
18 EO 3C E+1 -170 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.8 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry 45,83 %
19 EO 3S W = -600 9 40.91
20 EO 2T W+1 -110 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Philippe van der Gracht 50,49 %
21 EO 4C N = 620 3 13.64
22 EO 4K E = -130 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.9 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 57,90 %
23 EO 4P W-2 200 0.1 0.45
24 EO 2K S+1 110 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,23 %
A.3 Christine Defraigne -Michele Berrier 48,33 %
25 EO 5KcN-4 -800 22 100.00
26 EO 3S N+2 660 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A10 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 43,75 %
27 EO 2P N = 110 17 77.27
28 EO 4P N-1 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
Total : 257,3 / 528 = 48,73 %
PAIRE a.5 Myriam de Timary -Stan Tabor
A10 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 43,75 %
1 EO 2C E+1 -140 22 100.00
2 EO 3P E-1 50 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Diane Deslignes 64,30 %
5 EO 3S S+1 630 3 13.64
6 EO 4C N-1 -50 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.5 Simone Munsterhjelm -Colette Heerinckx 45,68 %
9 EO 2S N = 120 8 36.36
10 EO 3P S-1 -100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Jeannine Thys 37,27 %
11 EO 4P W+1 -450 20 90.91
12 EO 3S N+1 630 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.6 Sylviane Delbeke -Claire Destin 48,75 %
13 EO 4C E+2 -680 15 68.18
14 EO 3P S = 140 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A14 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 67,58 %
15 EO 1S E+1 -120 0 0.00
16 EO 5C E-1 100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia 53,75 %
17 EO 5C W-3 150 0 0.00
18 EO 3C E+1 -170 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 37,50 %
19 EO 3S W+1 -630 17 77.27
20 EO 2T W = -90 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.8 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry 45,83 %
21 EO 5T E-2 100 20 90.91
22 EO 5T S-2 -100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Philippe van der Gracht 50,49 %
23 EO 3C N-1 -100 13.2 60.00
24 EO 2S S+1 150 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.9 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 57,90 %
25 EO 5CcW-1 200 0 0.00
26 EO 3S N+1 630 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
A.3 Christine Defraigne -Michele Berrier 48,33 %
27 EO 2P N = 110 17 77.27
28 EO 5TcE-1 100 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
Total : 251,2 / 528 = 47,58 %
PAIRE a.4 Francoise Turin -Michel Lievens
A10 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 43,75 %
3 EO 1S W+2 -150 16 72.73
4 EO 4P W+1 -650 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 66,36 %
A.4 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 44,03 %
7 EO 5K E = -600 6 27.27
8 EO 4P N = 420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A12 Patrick Gilles -Jean Marie Schmiliver 55,21 %
9 EO 2S S+1 150 5 22.73
10 EO 3P S = 140 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
A.5 Simone Munsterhjelm -Colette Heerinckx 45,68 %
11 EO 3K E+2 -150 9 40.91
12 EO 2S S+1 150 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Jeannine Thys 37,27 %
13 EO 4C E+1 -650 6 27.27
14 EO 3K S+2 150 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.6 Sylviane Delbeke -Claire Destin 48,75 %
15 EO 3C E+2 -200 10 45.45
16 EO 4P N-2 -100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A14 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 67,58 %
17 EO 5C W-2 100 4 18.18
18 EO 4C E = -420 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia 53,75 %
19 EO 4P E-2 200 1 4.55
20 EO 2S W-1 100 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 37,50 %
21 EO 4T E-2 100 20 90.91
22 EO 5T S-1 -50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.8 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry 45,83 %
23 EO 3C N-2 -200 20.8 94.55
24 EO 1S S+2 150 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Philippe van der Gracht 50,49 %
25 EO 4C E-1 100 3 13.64
26 EO 3S S+2 660 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
A.9 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 57,90 %
27 EO 2P N+1 140 11 50.00
28 EO 4P N-1 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 236,0 / 528 = 44,70 %
PAIRE a14 Didier Collart -Gerard Cooreman
A.8 Brigitte Velge -Veronique Herry 45,83 %
1 EO 3C E-1 50 8 36.36
2 EO 4PcE-2 300 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 37,50 %
3 EO 1S W+2 -150 16 72.73
4 EO 4P W = -620 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 46,59 %
A.9 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 57,90 %
5 EO 3S S+1 630 3 13.64
6 EO 2C S+2 170 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Philippe van der Gracht 50,49 %
7 EO 4K W+1 -150 3 13.64
8 EO 4P S = 420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A10 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 43,75 %
9 EO 2K N = 90 21 95.45
10 EO 4P S-1 -100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
A.3 Christine Defraigne -Michele Berrier 48,33 %
11 EO 5K E+2 -440 18 81.82
12 EO 3S N = 600 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Diane Deslignes 64,30 %
13 EO 4K W-1 100 0 0.00
14 EO 5TcE-5 1100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.4 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 44,03 %
15 EO 3C E+1 -170 5 22.73
16 EO 4C E = -620 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A12 Patrick Gilles -Jean Marie Schmiliver 55,21 %
17 EO 5TcS-2 -300 14 63.64
18 EO 3C E+1 -170 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A.5 Simone Munsterhjelm -Colette Heerinckx 45,68 %
19 EO 3S W+1 -630 17 77.27
20 EO 2S W+1 -150 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
A.6 Sylviane Delbeke -Claire Destin 48,75 %
23 EO 3P W-1 100 7.7 35.00
24 EO 1S S+2 150 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A14 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 67,58 %
27 EO 2S W-3 150 6 27.27
28 EO 5T E-1 50 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
Total : 225,2 / 528 = 42,65 %
PAIRE a.9 Peter Masterson -Andre Delacroix
A12 Patrick Gilles -Jean Marie Schmiliver 55,21 %
1 EO 3S W-2 100 2 9.09
2 EO 3P E-1 50 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A.6 Sylviane Delbeke -Claire Destin 48,75 %
3 EO 2S W-1 100 3 13.64
4 EO 4P W+2 -680 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 56,59 %
A13 Annie Zeimes -Jeannine Thys 37,27 %
5 EO 3S S = 600 14 63.64
6 EO 2T S+2 130 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.7 Sylvette Kahaleh -Elena Valsesia 53,75 %
7 EO 3S E+2 -660 12 54.55
8 EO 4P S = 420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A14 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 67,58 %
9 EO 2S N+1 150 5 22.73
10 EO 2S N+1 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
A.1 Sophie Tilemans -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 37,50 %
13 EO 5C W+1 -680 15 68.18
14 EO 2P S+3 200 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.9 Marie Morimont -Chris Oostens 57,90 %
17 EO 4C W-1 50 8 36.36
18 EO 3C E+2 -200 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.3 Christine Defraigne -Michele Berrier 48,33 %
19 EO 3S W-1 100 4 18.18
20 EO 2S W+1 -150 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A10 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 43,75 %
21 EO 4CcN = 790 0 0.00
22 EO 4TcS = 510 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.4 Nicole Leclere -Annette Fobe 44,03 %
23 EO 2C N = 110 4.5 20.45
24 EO 1S S+2 150 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Diane Deslignes 64,30 %
25 EO 3K N-2 -100 7 31.82
26 EO 3S N+1 630 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.5 Simone Munsterhjelm -Colette Heerinckx 45,68 %
27 EO 2P N+2 170 2 9.09
28 EO 5P N-1 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
Total : 197,4 / 528 = 37,39 %
|