B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 56,58 A.7 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois
--- 2 56,04 A.9 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier
--- 3 55,15 A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren
--- 4 51,58 A.8 Monique Crouan -Claire Derieuw
--- 5 51,49 A10 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza
--- 6 51,19 A.5 Brigitte de Jamblinne -Brigitte Velge
--- 7 49,11 A.2 Jacques Podevyn -Francine Belet
--- 8 47,92 A.4 Brigitte Brusselmans -Thomas Brusselmans
--- 9 46,52 A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Chantal de Lichtervelde
--- 10 45,63 A.1 Fifi Englund -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
--- 11 45,36 A12 Myriam de Timary -Sophie Tilemans
--- 12 43,45 A.3 Michele Verhulst -Patricia Bardy
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 61,73 a.7 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne
--- 2 58,04 a.8 Pascale Graton -Caroline Lallia
--- 3 54,37 a10 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor
--- 4 53,48 a.1 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys
--- 5 50,30 a.4 Philippe d'Hoop -Bernard Iwes
--- 6 49,02 a.9 Catherine de Moffarts -Marie J. de Wagheneire
--- 7 47,53 a.3 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens
--- 8 47,29 a12 Lydia Wildiers -Philippe van der Gracht
--- 9 47,23 a.5 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
--- 10 44,64 a.2 Michel Lievens -Dilva Haym
--- 11 43,75 a.6 Veronique Englebienne -Virginie Van Damme
--- 12 43,04 a11 Pascale Bodart -Nadine Brabant
PAIRE A.7 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois
a12 Lydia Wildiers -Philippe van der Gracht 47,29 %
1 NS 6P E = -980 0.1 0.71
2 NS 3S W = -400 12 85.71
3 NS 1S S = 90 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 57,38 %
a11 Pascale Bodart -Nadine Brabant 43,04 %
4 NS 3T E+1 -130 3 21.43
5 NS 5C S = 650 5 35.71
6 NS 6S N+1 1020 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.7 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne 61,73 %
19 NS 6P S-1 -50 2 14.29
20 NS 4P W-2 200 10 71.43
21 NS 1S E+2 -150 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
a.6 Veronique Englebienne -Virginie Van Damme 43,75 %
22 NS 3P N = 140 9 64.29
23 NS 1S N-1 -100 6 42.86
24 NS 5C S+1 480 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
a.5 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 47,23 %
25 NS 3T E-1 100 11 78.57
26 NS 4P S-1 -100 6 42.86
27 NS 3S N+2 460 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
a.4 Philippe d'Hoop -Bernard Iwes 50,30 %
28 NS 4P W-4 200 12 85.71
29 NS 2P S+2 170 11 78.57
30 NS 4P N+1 450 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 78,57 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 47,53 %
31 NS 4P N+1 650 0 0.00
32 NS 2S E = -120 2 14.29
33 NS 3S E-2 100 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
a.2 Michel Lievens -Dilva Haym 44,64 %
34 NS 3S S-1 -100 5 35.71
35 NS 4P W-2 200 14 100.00
36 NS 4P N+3 710 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
Total : 190,1 / 336 = 56,58 %
PAIRE A.9 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier
a.5 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 47,23 %
1 NS 5P W+1 -480 9.3 66.43
2 NS 3S W+2 -460 3 21.43
3 NS 1P N+2 140 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,62 %
a.4 Philippe d'Hoop -Bernard Iwes 50,30 %
4 NS 3S E+1 -630 0 0.00
5 NS 5C N = 650 5 35.71
6 NS 6S N+1 1020 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
a.2 Michel Lievens -Dilva Haym 44,64 %
7 NS 2C W+1 -140 2 14.29
8 NS 4P S-2 -100 5 35.71
9 NS 6C E = -1430 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
a.1 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 53,48 %
10 NS 1S E = -90 10 71.43
11 NS 3K N+1 130 11 78.57
12 NS 4P W+2 -480 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
a.9 Catherine de Moffarts -Marie J. de Wagheneire 49,02 %
25 NS 3S W+1 -630 0 0.00
26 NS 3S S+1 630 14 100.00
27 NS 3S N+4 520 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
a.8 Pascale Graton -Caroline Lallia 58,04 %
28 NS 4PcW-2 300 14 100.00
29 NS 4P S-2 -200 1 7.14
30 NS 4P N+1 450 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
a.7 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne 61,73 %
31 NS 4P N+2 680 8 57.14
32 NS 3S E-1 100 10 71.43
33 NS 4P W-1 50 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
a.6 Veronique Englebienne -Virginie Van Damme 43,75 %
34 NS 3S S-1 -100 5 35.71
35 NS 4C E-1 100 11 78.57
36 NS 4P S+3 710 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
Total : 188,3 / 336 = 56,04 %
PAIRE A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren
a10 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 54,37 %
1 NS 5P W+1 -480 9.3 66.43
2 NS 3S W+2 -460 3 21.43
3 NS 1S W = -90 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 43,57 %
a.6 Veronique Englebienne -Virginie Van Damme 43,75 %
16 NS 3T N = 110 5 35.71
17 NS 3S E-1 50 10 71.43
18 NS 4P W-2 100 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
a.5 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 47,23 %
19 NS 6P S = 980 14 100.00
20 NS 4P W-2 200 10 71.43
21 NS 1S E = -90 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
a.4 Philippe d'Hoop -Bernard Iwes 50,30 %
22 NS 2P N = 110 4 28.57
23 NS 3K E-1 100 13 92.86
24 NS 5C S-1 -50 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 47,53 %
25 NS 1K E+1 -90 8 57.14
26 NS 2P S-1 -100 6 42.86
27 NS 4C N+1 450 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
a.2 Michel Lievens -Dilva Haym 44,64 %
28 NS 1S W+1 -120 5 35.71
29 NS 2P S = 110 8 57.14
30 NS 4P S+1 450 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
a.1 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 53,48 %
31 NS 4P N+2 680 8 57.14
32 NS 2S E-1 100 10 71.43
33 NS 4P W = -420 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a11 Pascale Bodart -Nadine Brabant 43,04 %
34 NS 4P S = 620 12 85.71
35 NS 4C W-1 100 11 78.57
36 NS 2P S+3 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
Total : 185,3 / 336 = 55,15 %
PAIRE A.8 Monique Crouan -Claire Derieuw
a.3 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 47,53 %
1 NS 5P W+1 -480 9.3 66.43
2 NS 3S W = -400 12 85.71
3 NS 2S N-1 -50 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 72,14 %
a.1 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 53,48 %
4 NS 4T E = -130 3 21.43
5 NS 5C N = 650 5 35.71
6 NS 3S N+3 490 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
a12 Lydia Wildiers -Philippe van der Gracht 47,29 %
7 NS 2C W-1 100 13 92.86
8 NS 3PcS = 530 14 100.00
9 NS 6C E+1 -1460 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
a.8 Pascale Graton -Caroline Lallia 58,04 %
22 NS 4P N-1 -50 1 7.14
23 NS 1S N-1 -100 6 42.86
24 NS 4C S = 420 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
a.7 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne 61,73 %
25 NS 2S W+1 -150 3 21.43
26 NS 4P S-2 -200 1 7.14
27 NS 3S S+2 460 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
a.6 Veronique Englebienne -Virginie Van Damme 43,75 %
28 NS 4PcW-1 100 8 57.14
29 NS 3C W = -140 4 28.57
30 NS 4P S+1 450 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
a.5 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 47,23 %
31 NS 4P N+2 680 8 57.14
32 NS 3S E-2 200 14 100.00
33 NS 4P W-1 50 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 78,57 %
a.4 Philippe d'Hoop -Bernard Iwes 50,30 %
34 NS 4P N = 620 12 85.71
35 NS 3S E+2 -660 0 0.00
36 NS 4P N+3 710 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
Total : 173,3 / 336 = 51,58 %
PAIRE A10 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza
a.7 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne 61,73 %
1 NS 50%60% Ajust 7 50.00
2 NS 5T E = -400 12 85.71
3 NS 1S N-2 -100 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
a.6 Veronique Englebienne -Virginie Van Damme 43,75 %
4 NS 3K W-1 100 11 78.57
5 NS 5C N+1 680 12 85.71
6 NS 3S S+3 490 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
a.5 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 47,23 %
7 NS 3K W+1 -130 4 28.57
8 NS 5PcS-2 -300 2 14.29
9 NS 6C E = -1430 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 47,53 %
10 NS 3S E-1 100 14 100.00
11 NS 3S S-3 -150 1 7.14
12 NS 4P W = -420 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
a.2 Michel Lievens -Dilva Haym 44,64 %
13 NS 1S N = 90 7 50.00
14 NS 2P E+3 -200 9 64.29
15 NS 3S N+1 630 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
a10 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 54,37 %
28 NS 4CcN-1 -200 0 0.00
29 NS 3P N-1 -100 6 42.86
30 NS 4P N+1 450 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
a.9 Catherine de Moffarts -Marie J. de Wagheneire 49,02 %
31 NS 4P N+2 680 8 57.14
32 NS 2K W = -90 6 42.86
33 NS 3S E = -400 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.8 Pascale Graton -Caroline Lallia 58,04 %
34 NS 3S S-1 -100 5 35.71
35 NS 4C E+1 -650 2 14.29
36 NS 4P S+3 710 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
Total : 173,0 / 336 = 51,49 %
PAIRE A.5 Brigitte de Jamblinne -Brigitte Velge
a.5 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 47,23 %
13 NS 1S N = 90 7 50.00
14 NS 4P E+1 -450 1 7.14
15 NS 3S N-1 -100 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
a.4 Philippe d'Hoop -Bernard Iwes 50,30 %
16 NS 3T N = 110 5 35.71
17 NS 2K E = -90 3 21.43
18 NS 4P W-1 50 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 47,53 %
19 NS 4P N+2 480 7 50.00
20 NS 4P W-2 200 10 71.43
21 NS 1S E+2 -150 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.2 Michel Lievens -Dilva Haym 44,64 %
22 NS 2P N+1 140 9 64.29
23 NS 3K E-1 100 13 92.86
24 NS 5CcS = 650 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,71 %
a.1 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 53,48 %
25 NS 1P S-2 -100 6 42.86
26 NS 1P S+2 140 12 85.71
27 NS 3S N+2 460 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
a12 Lydia Wildiers -Philippe van der Gracht 47,29 %
28 NS 1S W+1 -120 5 35.71
29 NS 2P S+2 170 11 78.57
30 NS 4C S-2 -100 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
a10 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 54,37 %
31 NS 4P N+2 680 8 57.14
32 NS 3S E-1 100 10 71.43
33 NS 4P W = -420 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.9 Catherine de Moffarts -Marie J. de Wagheneire 49,02 %
34 NS 3S S-1 -100 5 35.71
35 NS 3S W = -600 7 50.00
36 NS 4P S+3 710 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
Total : 172,0 / 336 = 51,19 %
PAIRE A.2 Jacques Podevyn -Francine Belet
a.2 Michel Lievens -Dilva Haym 44,64 %
4 NS 3K W-1 100 11 78.57
5 NS 4C N-1 -100 0 0.00
6 NS 3S N+3 490 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
a.1 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 53,48 %
7 NS 2P N-1 -100 10 71.43
8 NS 4C W-1 50 10 71.43
9 NS 6C E = -1430 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
a12 Lydia Wildiers -Philippe van der Gracht 47,29 %
10 NS 1S E+1 -120 3 21.43
11 NS 5K N-1 -50 5 35.71
12 NS 4P W+2 -480 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 21,43 %
a11 Pascale Bodart -Nadine Brabant 43,04 %
13 NS 1S N+1 120 14 100.00
14 NS 3P E+1 -170 14 100.00
15 NS 3S N-1 -100 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
a10 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 54,37 %
16 NS 1S N+3 180 14 100.00
17 NS 1S W = -90 3 21.43
18 NS 4K E-1 50 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
a.9 Catherine de Moffarts -Marie J. de Wagheneire 49,02 %
19 NS 4P S+2 480 7 50.00
20 NS 4P W-2 200 10 71.43
21 NS 1S E+2 -150 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.7 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne 61,73 %
22 NS 2P N+1 140 9 64.29
23 NS 2P W = -110 1 7.14
24 NS 5C N-1 -50 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
a.6 Veronique Englebienne -Virginie Van Damme 43,75 %
25 NS 2C W-2 200 14 100.00
26 NS 2C W-2 80 10 71.43
27 NS 1P S = 400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
Total : 165,0 / 336 = 49,11 %
PAIRE A.4 Brigitte Brusselmans -Thomas Brusselmans
a.4 Philippe d'Hoop -Bernard Iwes 50,30 %
10 NS 2P S-1 -100 6 42.86
11 NS 3S S-3 -150 1 7.14
12 NS 4P E = -420 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 47,53 %
13 NS 1S N-1 -100 0 0.00
14 NS 3P E+2 -200 9 64.29
15 NS 3S N+1 630 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
a.2 Michel Lievens -Dilva Haym 44,64 %
16 NS 3T N+1 130 11 78.57
17 NS 3S W = -400 0 0.00
18 NS 4P E-1 50 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
a.1 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 53,48 %
19 NS 6P S-1 -50 2 14.29
20 NS 4P W-2 200 10 71.43
21 NS 1S E+2 -150 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
a12 Lydia Wildiers -Philippe van der Gracht 47,29 %
22 NS 2P N-1 -50 1 7.14
23 NS 2K E = -90 10 71.43
24 NS 5C S+1 480 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
a11 Pascale Bodart -Nadine Brabant 43,04 %
25 NS 2C W-1 100 11 78.57
26 NS 4P S-2 -200 1 7.14
27 NS 6C N = 980 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
a.9 Catherine de Moffarts -Marie J. de Wagheneire 49,02 %
28 NS 4P W-3 150 10 71.43
29 NS 4C W-2 200 14 100.00
30 NS 2C S-1 -50 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.8 Pascale Graton -Caroline Lallia 58,04 %
31 NS 4P N+2 680 8 57.14
32 NS 3S E+1 -630 0 0.00
33 NS 4P W+1 -450 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 19,05 %
Total : 161,0 / 336 = 47,92 %
PAIRE A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Chantal de Lichtervelde
a.9 Catherine de Moffarts -Marie J. de Wagheneire 49,02 %
1 NS 4P W+2 -480 9.3 66.43
2 NS 3S E+2 -460 3 21.43
3 NS 1S W+1 -120 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 34,05 %
a.8 Pascale Graton -Caroline Lallia 58,04 %
4 NS 3S E-1 100 11 78.57
5 NS 5C N+1 680 12 85.71
6 NS 6S N = 990 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
a.7 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne 61,73 %
7 NS 1S W+1 -120 6 42.86
8 NS 4C E = -420 0 0.00
9 NS 6C W = -1430 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
a.6 Veronique Englebienne -Virginie Van Damme 43,75 %
10 NS 1S E = -90 10 71.43
11 NS 3S S+2 460 14 100.00
12 NS 4P W+1 -450 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
a.4 Philippe d'Hoop -Bernard Iwes 50,30 %
13 NS 1S N = 90 7 50.00
14 NS 4P E+1 -450 1 7.14
15 NS 3T S+1 130 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
a.3 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 47,53 %
16 NS 3T N+1 130 11 78.57
17 NS 3S W-1 50 10 71.43
18 NS 4C E = -420 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
a11 Pascale Bodart -Nadine Brabant 43,04 %
31 NS 4P N+2 680 8 57.14
32 NS 2C N-2 -100 4 28.57
33 NS 3S E = -400 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
a10 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 54,37 %
34 NS 3S S-2 -200 0 0.00
35 NS 4C W = -620 4 28.57
36 NS 2P S+5 260 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 14,29 %
Total : 156,3 / 336 = 46,52 %
PAIRE A.1 Fifi Englund -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
a.1 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 53,48 %
1 NS 5P W+1 -480 9.3 66.43
2 NS 3S W+2 -460 3 21.43
3 NS 1S N-3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,29 %
a12 Lydia Wildiers -Philippe van der Gracht 47,29 %
4 NS 3S W-1 100 11 78.57
5 NS 5C N+1 680 12 85.71
6 NS 6K N = 920 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
a11 Pascale Bodart -Nadine Brabant 43,04 %
7 NS 2K W+1 -110 8 57.14
8 NS 5C W-2 100 12 85.71
9 NS 6C E+1 -1460 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
a10 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 54,37 %
10 NS 1S E = -90 10 71.43
11 NS 3K N+1 130 11 78.57
12 NS 4P E+1 -450 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
a.9 Catherine de Moffarts -Marie J. de Wagheneire 49,02 %
13 NS 1S N = 90 7 50.00
14 NS 2P E+3 -200 9 64.29
15 NS 5T S-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
a.8 Pascale Graton -Caroline Lallia 58,04 %
16 NS 3T N = 110 5 35.71
17 NS 3S E-1 50 10 71.43
18 NS 2P W = -110 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
a.6 Veronique Englebienne -Virginie Van Damme 43,75 %
19 NS 6P S-1 -50 2 14.29
20 NS 3S W = -600 1 7.14
21 NS 1S E+2 -150 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
a.5 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 47,23 %
22 NS 1S W-2 200 14 100.00
23 NS 2K E+1 -110 1 7.14
24 NS 5P E-2 100 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 153,3 / 336 = 45,63 %
PAIRE A12 Myriam de Timary -Sophie Tilemans
a11 Pascale Bodart -Nadine Brabant 43,04 %
1 NS 5P E+2 -510 2.4 17.14
2 NS 3S W+1 -430 8 57.14
3 NS 1S S-1 -50 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 46,19 %
a10 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 54,37 %
4 NS 3T E = -110 6 42.86
5 NS 5C N = 650 5 35.71
6 NS 6S N = 990 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
a.9 Catherine de Moffarts -Marie J. de Wagheneire 49,02 %
7 NS 3C W-1 100 13 92.86
8 NS 5P S-1 -50 8 57.14
9 NS 6C E+1 -1460 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
a.8 Pascale Graton -Caroline Lallia 58,04 %
10 NS 1S E+1 -120 3 21.43
11 NS 3S S-1 -50 5 35.71
12 NS 4P W+1 -450 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.7 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne 61,73 %
13 NS 1S N = 90 7 50.00
14 NS 4P E = -420 4 28.57
15 NS 3T S+1 130 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
a.5 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 47,23 %
16 NS 3K W-1 100 0 0.00
17 NS 3S W-1 50 10 71.43
18 NS 5TcN-3 -800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
a.4 Philippe d'Hoop -Bernard Iwes 50,30 %
19 NS 4P S+3 510 11 78.57
20 NS 3S W = -600 1 7.14
21 NS 1S E = -90 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
a12 Lydia Wildiers -Philippe van der Gracht 47,29 %
34 NS 4P S = 620 12 85.71
35 NS 3S W = -600 7 50.00
36 NS 4P N+2 680 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
Total : 152,4 / 336 = 45,36 %
PAIRE A.3 Michele Verhulst -Patricia Bardy
a.3 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens 47,53 %
7 NS 3C W+3 -230 0 0.00
8 NS 4P S-2 -100 5 35.71
9 NS 4C E+3 -710 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
a.2 Michel Lievens -Dilva Haym 44,64 %
10 NS 1S E+2 -150 0 0.00
11 NS 3K N = 110 8 57.14
12 NS 4P W = -420 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
a.1 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys 53,48 %
13 NS 1S N = 90 7 50.00
14 NS 3P E+2 -200 9 64.29
15 NS 4T S-1 -100 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
a12 Lydia Wildiers -Philippe van der Gracht 47,29 %
16 NS 3T S = 110 5 35.71
17 NS 3S E-1 50 10 71.43
18 NS 4C W-1 50 9 64.29 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
a11 Pascale Bodart -Nadine Brabant 43,04 %
19 NS 4P S+3 510 11 78.57
20 NS 4P W-1 100 4 28.57
21 NS 1S E-1 50 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
a10 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor 54,37 %
22 NS 2P N+1 140 9 64.29
23 NS 1S N-1 -100 6 42.86
24 NS 4P E-1 50 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
a.8 Pascale Graton -Caroline Lallia 58,04 %
25 NS 2S W+1 -150 3 21.43
26 NS 4P S-1 -100 6 42.86
27 NS 4P S = 420 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 26,19 %
a.7 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne 61,73 %
28 NS 3P W = -140 2 14.29
29 NS 4P S-2 -200 1 7.14
30 NS 3TcS-1 -100 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 9,52 %
Total : 146,0 / 336 = 43,45 %
PAIRE a.7 Francoise Duren -Jean de Villenfagne
A10 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 51,49 %
1 EO 50%60% Ajust 8.4 60.00
2 EO 5T E = -400 2 14.29
3 EO 1S N-2 -100 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 48,57 %
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Chantal de Lichtervelde 46,52 %
7 EO 1S W+1 -120 8 57.14
8 EO 4C E = -420 14 100.00
9 EO 6C W = -1430 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
A12 Myriam de Timary -Sophie Tilemans 45,36 %
13 EO 1S N = 90 7 50.00
14 EO 4P E = -420 10 71.43
15 EO 3T S+1 130 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
A.7 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 56,58 %
19 EO 6P S-1 -50 12 85.71
20 EO 4P W-2 200 4 28.57
21 EO 1S E+2 -150 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
A.2 Jacques Podevyn -Francine Belet 49,11 %
22 EO 2P N+1 140 5 35.71
23 EO 2P W = -110 13 92.86
24 EO 5C N-1 -50 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
A.8 Monique Crouan -Claire Derieuw 51,58 %
25 EO 2S W+1 -150 11 78.57
26 EO 4P S-2 -200 13 92.86
27 EO 3S S+2 460 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
A.3 Michele Verhulst -Patricia Bardy 43,45 %
28 EO 3P W = -140 12 85.71
29 EO 4P S-2 -200 13 92.86
30 EO 3TcS-1 -100 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 90,48 %
A.9 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 56,04 %
31 EO 4P N+2 680 6 42.86
32 EO 3S E-1 100 4 28.57
33 EO 4P W-1 50 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
Total : 207,4 / 336 = 61,73 %
PAIRE a.8 Pascale Graton -Caroline Lallia
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Chantal de Lichtervelde 46,52 %
4 EO 3S E-1 100 3 21.43
5 EO 5C N+1 680 2 14.29
6 EO 6S N = 990 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
A12 Myriam de Timary -Sophie Tilemans 45,36 %
10 EO 1S E+1 -120 11 78.57
11 EO 3S S-1 -50 9 64.29
12 EO 4P W+1 -450 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.1 Fifi Englund -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 45,63 %
16 EO 3T N = 110 9 64.29
17 EO 3S E-1 50 4 28.57
18 EO 2P W = -110 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
A.8 Monique Crouan -Claire Derieuw 51,58 %
22 EO 4P N-1 -50 13 92.86
23 EO 1S N-1 -100 8 57.14
24 EO 4C S = 420 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
A.3 Michele Verhulst -Patricia Bardy 43,45 %
25 EO 2S W+1 -150 11 78.57
26 EO 4P S-1 -100 8 57.14
27 EO 4P S = 420 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 73,81 %
A.9 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 56,04 %
28 EO 4PcW-2 300 0 0.00
29 EO 4P S-2 -200 13 92.86
30 EO 4P N+1 450 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
A.4 Brigitte Brusselmans -Thomas Brusselmans 47,92 %
31 EO 4P N+2 680 6 42.86
32 EO 3S E+1 -630 14 100.00
33 EO 4P W+1 -450 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 80,95 %
A10 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 51,49 %
34 EO 3S S-1 -100 9 64.29
35 EO 4C E+1 -650 12 85.71
36 EO 4P S+3 710 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
Total : 195,0 / 336 = 58,04 %
PAIRE a10 Edith Bjorn -Stan Tabor
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 55,15 %
1 EO 5P W+1 -480 4.7 33.57
2 EO 3S W+2 -460 11 78.57
3 EO 1S W = -90 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 56,43 %
A12 Myriam de Timary -Sophie Tilemans 45,36 %
4 EO 3T E = -110 8 57.14
5 EO 5C N = 650 9 64.29
6 EO 6S N = 990 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
A.1 Fifi Englund -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 45,63 %
10 EO 1S E = -90 4 28.57
11 EO 3K N+1 130 3 21.43
12 EO 4P E+1 -450 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
A.2 Jacques Podevyn -Francine Belet 49,11 %
16 EO 1S N+3 180 0 0.00
17 EO 1S W = -90 11 78.57
18 EO 4K E-1 50 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
A.3 Michele Verhulst -Patricia Bardy 43,45 %
22 EO 2P N+1 140 5 35.71
23 EO 1S N-1 -100 8 57.14
24 EO 4P E-1 50 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
A10 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 51,49 %
28 EO 4CcN-1 -200 14 100.00
29 EO 3P N-1 -100 8 57.14
30 EO 4P N+1 450 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
A.5 Brigitte de Jamblinne -Brigitte Velge 51,19 %
31 EO 4P N+2 680 6 42.86
32 EO 3S E-1 100 4 28.57
33 EO 4P W = -420 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Chantal de Lichtervelde 46,52 %
34 EO 3S S-2 -200 14 100.00
35 EO 4C W = -620 10 71.43
36 EO 2P S+5 260 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 85,71 %
Total : 182,7 / 336 = 54,37 %
PAIRE a.1 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Thys
A.1 Fifi Englund -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 45,63 %
1 EO 5P W+1 -480 4.7 33.57
2 EO 3S W+2 -460 11 78.57
3 EO 1S N-3 -150 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,71 %
A.8 Monique Crouan -Claire Derieuw 51,58 %
4 EO 4T E = -130 11 78.57
5 EO 5C N = 650 9 64.29
6 EO 3S N+3 490 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
A.2 Jacques Podevyn -Francine Belet 49,11 %
7 EO 2P N-1 -100 4 28.57
8 EO 4C W-1 50 4 28.57
9 EO 6C E = -1430 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
A.9 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 56,04 %
10 EO 1S E = -90 4 28.57
11 EO 3K N+1 130 3 21.43
12 EO 4P W+2 -480 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A.3 Michele Verhulst -Patricia Bardy 43,45 %
13 EO 1S N = 90 7 50.00
14 EO 3P E+2 -200 5 35.71
15 EO 4T S-1 -100 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
A.4 Brigitte Brusselmans -Thomas Brusselmans 47,92 %
19 EO 6P S-1 -50 12 85.71
20 EO 4P W-2 200 4 28.57
21 EO 1S E+2 -150 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
A.5 Brigitte de Jamblinne -Brigitte Velge 51,19 %
25 EO 1P S-2 -100 8 57.14
26 EO 1P S+2 140 2 14.29
27 EO 3S N+2 460 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 55,15 %
31 EO 4P N+2 680 6 42.86
32 EO 2S E-1 100 4 28.57
33 EO 4P W = -420 11 78.57 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 179,7 / 336 = 53,48 %
PAIRE a.4 Philippe d'Hoop -Bernard Iwes
A.9 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 56,04 %
4 EO 3S E+1 -630 14 100.00
5 EO 5C N = 650 9 64.29
6 EO 6S N+1 1020 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
A.4 Brigitte Brusselmans -Thomas Brusselmans 47,92 %
10 EO 2P S-1 -100 8 57.14
11 EO 3S S-3 -150 13 92.86
12 EO 4P E = -420 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Chantal de Lichtervelde 46,52 %
13 EO 1S N = 90 7 50.00
14 EO 4P E+1 -450 13 92.86
15 EO 3T S+1 130 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
A.5 Brigitte de Jamblinne -Brigitte Velge 51,19 %
16 EO 3T N = 110 9 64.29
17 EO 2K E = -90 11 78.57
18 EO 4P W-1 50 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
A12 Myriam de Timary -Sophie Tilemans 45,36 %
19 EO 4P S+3 510 3 21.43
20 EO 3S W = -600 13 92.86
21 EO 1S E = -90 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 55,15 %
22 EO 2P N = 110 10 71.43
23 EO 3K E-1 100 1 7.14
24 EO 5C S-1 -50 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
A.7 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 56,58 %
28 EO 4P W-4 200 2 14.29
29 EO 2P S+2 170 3 21.43
30 EO 4P N+1 450 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 21,43 %
A.8 Monique Crouan -Claire Derieuw 51,58 %
34 EO 4P N = 620 2 14.29
35 EO 3S E+2 -660 14 100.00
36 EO 4P N+3 710 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
Total : 169,0 / 336 = 50,30 %
PAIRE a.9 Catherine de Moffarts -Marie J. de Wagheneire
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Chantal de Lichtervelde 46,52 %
1 EO 4P W+2 -480 4.7 33.57
2 EO 3S E+2 -460 11 78.57
3 EO 1S W+1 -120 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 65,95 %
A12 Myriam de Timary -Sophie Tilemans 45,36 %
7 EO 3C W-1 100 1 7.14
8 EO 5P S-1 -50 6 42.86
9 EO 6C E+1 -1460 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
A.1 Fifi Englund -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 45,63 %
13 EO 1S N = 90 7 50.00
14 EO 2P E+3 -200 5 35.71
15 EO 5T S-2 -200 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
A.2 Jacques Podevyn -Francine Belet 49,11 %
19 EO 4P S+2 480 7 50.00
20 EO 4P W-2 200 4 28.57
21 EO 1S E+2 -150 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.9 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 56,04 %
25 EO 3S W+1 -630 14 100.00
26 EO 3S S+1 630 0 0.00
27 EO 3S N+4 520 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
A.4 Brigitte Brusselmans -Thomas Brusselmans 47,92 %
28 EO 4P W-3 150 4 28.57
29 EO 4C W-2 200 0 0.00
30 EO 2C S-1 -50 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A10 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 51,49 %
31 EO 4P N+2 680 6 42.86
32 EO 2K W = -90 8 57.14
33 EO 3S E = -400 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.5 Brigitte de Jamblinne -Brigitte Velge 51,19 %
34 EO 3S S-1 -100 9 64.29
35 EO 3S W = -600 7 50.00
36 EO 4P S+3 710 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
Total : 164,7 / 336 = 49,02 %
PAIRE a.3 Didier Collart -Helene Christiaens
A.8 Monique Crouan -Claire Derieuw 51,58 %
1 EO 5P W+1 -480 4.7 33.57
2 EO 3S W = -400 2 14.29
3 EO 2S N-1 -50 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 27,86 %
A.3 Michele Verhulst -Patricia Bardy 43,45 %
7 EO 3C W+3 -230 14 100.00
8 EO 4P S-2 -100 9 64.29
9 EO 4C E+3 -710 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
A10 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 51,49 %
10 EO 3S E-1 100 0 0.00
11 EO 3S S-3 -150 13 92.86
12 EO 4P W = -420 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 35,71 %
A.4 Brigitte Brusselmans -Thomas Brusselmans 47,92 %
13 EO 1S N-1 -100 14 100.00
14 EO 3P E+2 -200 5 35.71
15 EO 3S N+1 630 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Chantal de Lichtervelde 46,52 %
16 EO 3T N+1 130 3 21.43
17 EO 3S W-1 50 4 28.57
18 EO 4C E = -420 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
A.5 Brigitte de Jamblinne -Brigitte Velge 51,19 %
19 EO 4P N+2 480 7 50.00
20 EO 4P W-2 200 4 28.57
21 EO 1S E+2 -150 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 55,15 %
25 EO 1K E+1 -90 6 42.86
26 EO 2P S-1 -100 8 57.14
27 EO 4C N+1 450 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 57,14 %
A.7 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 56,58 %
31 EO 4P N+1 650 14 100.00
32 EO 2S E = -120 12 85.71
33 EO 3S E-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
Total : 159,7 / 336 = 47,53 %
PAIRE a12 Lydia Wildiers -Philippe van der Gracht
A.7 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 56,58 %
1 EO 6P E = -980 13.9 99.29
2 EO 3S W = -400 2 14.29
3 EO 1S S = 90 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 42,62 %
A.1 Fifi Englund -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 45,63 %
4 EO 3S W-1 100 3 21.43
5 EO 5C N+1 680 2 14.29
6 EO 6K N = 920 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
A.8 Monique Crouan -Claire Derieuw 51,58 %
7 EO 2C W-1 100 1 7.14
8 EO 3PcS = 530 0 0.00
9 EO 6C E+1 -1460 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
A.2 Jacques Podevyn -Francine Belet 49,11 %
10 EO 1S E+1 -120 11 78.57
11 EO 5K N-1 -50 9 64.29
12 EO 4P W+2 -480 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 78,57 %
A.3 Michele Verhulst -Patricia Bardy 43,45 %
16 EO 3T S = 110 9 64.29
17 EO 3S E-1 50 4 28.57
18 EO 4C W-1 50 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
A.4 Brigitte Brusselmans -Thomas Brusselmans 47,92 %
22 EO 2P N-1 -50 13 92.86
23 EO 2K E = -90 4 28.57
24 EO 5C S+1 480 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A.5 Brigitte de Jamblinne -Brigitte Velge 51,19 %
28 EO 1S W+1 -120 9 64.29
29 EO 2P S+2 170 3 21.43
30 EO 4C S-2 -100 13 92.86 µ Tbl = 59,52 %
A12 Myriam de Timary -Sophie Tilemans 45,36 %
34 EO 4P S = 620 2 14.29
35 EO 3S W = -600 7 50.00
36 EO 4P N+2 680 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
Total : 158,9 / 336 = 47,29 %
PAIRE a.5 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
A.9 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 56,04 %
1 EO 5P W+1 -480 4.7 33.57
2 EO 3S W+2 -460 11 78.57
3 EO 1P N+2 140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,38 %
A10 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 51,49 %
7 EO 3K W+1 -130 10 71.43
8 EO 5PcS-2 -300 12 85.71
9 EO 6C E = -1430 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 64,29 %
A.5 Brigitte de Jamblinne -Brigitte Velge 51,19 %
13 EO 1S N = 90 7 50.00
14 EO 4P E+1 -450 13 92.86
15 EO 3S N-1 -100 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 71,43 %
A12 Myriam de Timary -Sophie Tilemans 45,36 %
16 EO 3K W-1 100 14 100.00
17 EO 3S W-1 50 4 28.57
18 EO 5TcN-3 -800 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 76,19 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 55,15 %
19 EO 6P S = 980 0 0.00
20 EO 4P W-2 200 4 28.57
21 EO 1S E = -90 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
A.1 Fifi Englund -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 45,63 %
22 EO 1S W-2 200 0 0.00
23 EO 2K E+1 -110 13 92.86
24 EO 5P E-2 100 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.7 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 56,58 %
25 EO 3T E-1 100 3 21.43
26 EO 4P S-1 -100 8 57.14
27 EO 3S N+2 460 6 42.86 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
A.8 Monique Crouan -Claire Derieuw 51,58 %
31 EO 4P N+2 680 6 42.86
32 EO 3S E-2 200 0 0.00
33 EO 4P W-1 50 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 21,43 %
Total : 158,7 / 336 = 47,23 %
PAIRE a.2 Michel Lievens -Dilva Haym
A.2 Jacques Podevyn -Francine Belet 49,11 %
4 EO 3K W-1 100 3 21.43
5 EO 4C N-1 -100 14 100.00
6 EO 3S N+3 490 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 69,05 %
A.9 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 56,04 %
7 EO 2C W+1 -140 12 85.71
8 EO 4P S-2 -100 9 64.29
9 EO 6C E = -1430 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 61,90 %
A.3 Michele Verhulst -Patricia Bardy 43,45 %
10 EO 1S E+2 -150 14 100.00
11 EO 3K N = 110 6 42.86
12 EO 4P W = -420 2 14.29 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
A10 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 51,49 %
13 EO 1S N = 90 7 50.00
14 EO 2P E+3 -200 5 35.71
15 EO 3S N+1 630 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
A.4 Brigitte Brusselmans -Thomas Brusselmans 47,92 %
16 EO 3T N+1 130 3 21.43
17 EO 3S W = -400 14 100.00
18 EO 4P E-1 50 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 52,38 %
A.5 Brigitte de Jamblinne -Brigitte Velge 51,19 %
22 EO 2P N+1 140 5 35.71
23 EO 3K E-1 100 1 7.14
24 EO 5CcS = 650 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 14,29 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 55,15 %
28 EO 1S W+1 -120 9 64.29
29 EO 2P S = 110 6 42.86
30 EO 4P S+1 450 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
A.7 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 56,58 %
34 EO 3S S-1 -100 9 64.29
35 EO 4P W-2 200 0 0.00
36 EO 4P N+3 710 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
Total : 150,0 / 336 = 44,64 %
PAIRE a.6 Veronique Englebienne -Virginie Van Damme
A10 Annie Zeimes -Rose Marie Vaccarezza 51,49 %
4 EO 3K W-1 100 3 21.43
5 EO 5C N+1 680 2 14.29
6 EO 3S S+3 490 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 40,48 %
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Chantal de Lichtervelde 46,52 %
10 EO 1S E = -90 4 28.57
11 EO 3S S+2 460 0 0.00
12 EO 4P W+1 -450 8 57.14 µ Tbl = 28,57 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 55,15 %
16 EO 3T N = 110 9 64.29
17 EO 3S E-1 50 4 28.57
18 EO 4P W-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
A.1 Fifi Englund -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 45,63 %
19 EO 6P S-1 -50 12 85.71
20 EO 3S W = -600 13 92.86
21 EO 1S E+2 -150 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
A.7 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 56,58 %
22 EO 3P N = 140 5 35.71
23 EO 1S N-1 -100 8 57.14
24 EO 5C S+1 480 3 21.43 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
A.2 Jacques Podevyn -Francine Belet 49,11 %
25 EO 2C W-2 200 0 0.00
26 EO 2C W-2 80 4 28.57
27 EO 1P S = 400 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 42,86 %
A.8 Monique Crouan -Claire Derieuw 51,58 %
28 EO 4PcW-1 100 6 42.86
29 EO 3C W = -140 10 71.43
30 EO 4P S+1 450 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A.9 Teresa Dekoster -Michele Berrier 56,04 %
34 EO 3S S-1 -100 9 64.29
35 EO 4C E-1 100 3 21.43
36 EO 4P S+3 710 4 28.57 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
Total : 147,0 / 336 = 43,75 %
PAIRE a11 Pascale Bodart -Nadine Brabant
A12 Myriam de Timary -Sophie Tilemans 45,36 %
1 EO 5P E+2 -510 11.6 82.86
2 EO 3S W+1 -430 6 42.86
3 EO 1S S-1 -50 5 35.71 µ Tbl = 53,81 %
A.7 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 56,58 %
4 EO 3T E+1 -130 11 78.57
5 EO 5C S = 650 9 64.29
6 EO 6S N+1 1020 1 7.14 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.1 Fifi Englund -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 45,63 %
7 EO 2K W+1 -110 6 42.86
8 EO 5C W-2 100 2 14.29
9 EO 6C E+1 -1460 12 85.71 µ Tbl = 47,62 %
A.2 Jacques Podevyn -Francine Belet 49,11 %
13 EO 1S N+1 120 0 0.00
14 EO 3P E+1 -170 0 0.00
15 EO 3S N-1 -100 10 71.43 µ Tbl = 23,81 %
A.3 Michele Verhulst -Patricia Bardy 43,45 %
19 EO 4P S+3 510 3 21.43
20 EO 4P W-1 100 10 71.43
21 EO 1S E-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 30,95 %
A.4 Brigitte Brusselmans -Thomas Brusselmans 47,92 %
25 EO 2C W-1 100 3 21.43
26 EO 4P S-2 -200 13 92.86
27 EO 6C N = 980 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,10 %
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Chantal de Lichtervelde 46,52 %
31 EO 4P N+2 680 6 42.86
32 EO 2C N-2 -100 10 71.43
33 EO 3S E = -400 7 50.00 µ Tbl = 54,76 %
A.6 Bernard Groetembril -Kathleen van Doren 55,15 %
34 EO 4P S = 620 2 14.29
35 EO 4C W-1 100 3 21.43
36 EO 2P S+3 200 14 100.00 µ Tbl = 45,24 %
Total : 144,6 / 336 = 43,04 %
|