B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 61,17 A11 Patrick Gilles -Philippe Dekandelaer
--- 2 57,97 A.5 Colette Heerinckx -Eliane de Ceuninck
--- 3 57,50 A13 Christine Defraigne -Michele Berrier
--- 4 56,59 A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois
--- 5 54,55 A.9 Jean Chabotier -Michel Paquot
--- 6 49,51 A.8 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere
--- 7 49,30 A.7 Ines Drory -Elena Valsesia
--- 8 46,52 A.6 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy
--- 9 45,93 A.4 Patrizia Vaccani -Didier Collart
--- ~ 45,93 A.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Francoise Turin
--- 11 43,66 A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens
--- 12 42,08 A12 Gerard Cooreman -Helene Christiaens
--- 13 39,09 A10 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten
--- 14 0,00 A14 -
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 58,56 a.7 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
--- 2 58,10 a.9 Luc Cartuyvels -Lydia Wildiers
--- 3 58,08 a.3 Francis Rittweger -Hugo Baetens
--- 4 55,08 a.4 Serge Alard -Noelle Fosse
--- 5 53,95 a11 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver
--- 6 52,60 a.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Jean de Villenfagne
--- 7 51,05 a12 Antoinette Goffin -Nicole Louette
--- 8 50,81 a13 Michel Lievens -Annie Zeimes
--- 9 50,56 a.8 Catherine de Moffarts -Jeannine Wanderpepen
--- ~ 50,25 a10 Olivier Paternostre -Diane Emsens
--- 11 45,43 a.6 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie
--- 12 44,83 a.1 Aida Zumot -Marie J. de Wagheneire
--- 13 40,54 a.5 Christiane Huby -Myriam de Timary
--- 14 30,08 a14 Chantal Huybrechts. -Marie-Catherine Beer
PAIRE A11 Patrick Gilles -Philippe Dekandelaer
a.7 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 58,56 %
1 NS 4P N+2 480 18.6 84.55
2 NS 6P E-1 50 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 84,55 %
a.6 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 45,43 %
3 NS 3K W-1 100 15.4 70.00
4 NS 2K W = -90 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a.5 Christiane Huby -Myriam de Timary 40,54 %
5 NS 3C W-2 100 15.4 70.00
6 NS 4P N-1 -50 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a.3 Francis Rittweger -Hugo Baetens 58,08 %
7 NS 3S S+2 660 21.9 99.55
8 NS 3S E-1 50 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Jean de Villenfagne 52,60 %
9 NS 7T S = 1440 21.9 99.55
10 NS 3T W-2 200 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 94,55 %
a.1 Aida Zumot -Marie J. de Wagheneire 44,83 %
11 NS 3P S = 140 15.4 70.00
12 NS 1T W+3 -130 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
a14 Chantal Huybrechts. -Marie-Catherine Beer 30,08 %
13 NS 1S S+3 180 11 50.00
14 NS 3C W-1 50 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a13 Michel Lievens -Annie Zeimes 50,81 %
15 NS 3P E-2 100 0.1 0.45
16 NS 2S S-1 -50 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
a11 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver 53,95 %
21 NS 2C E+1 -140 14.3 65.00
22 NS 2K N+1 110 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
a10 Olivier Paternostre -Diane Emsens 50,25 %
23 NS 6C E+1 -1460 3 13.64
24 NS 2C N = 110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a.9 Luc Cartuyvels -Lydia Wildiers 58,10 %
25 NS 4P E+2 -680 12 54.55
26 NS 3S S+1 630 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a.8 Catherine de Moffarts -Jeannine Wanderpepen 50,56 %
27 NS 5C S = 450 18.6 84.55
28 NS 3S E+1 -430 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
Total : 323,0 / 528 = 61,17 %
PAIRE A.5 Colette Heerinckx -Eliane de Ceuninck
a.8 Catherine de Moffarts -Jeannine Wanderpepen 50,56 %
1 NS 4P S+2 480 18.6 84.55
2 NS 4P E+1 -450 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
a.7 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 58,56 %
3 NS 2K W-1 100 15.4 70.00
4 NS 2K W+1 -110 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a.5 Christiane Huby -Myriam de Timary 40,54 %
9 NS 5T S+2 440 7.7 35.00
10 NS 3C N = 140 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.4 Serge Alard -Noelle Fosse 55,08 %
11 NS 3P S = 140 15.4 70.00
12 NS 4P W+1 -450 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.3 Francis Rittweger -Hugo Baetens 58,08 %
13 NS 3S S = 600 16.5 75.00
14 NS 3C W = -140 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 45,23 %
a.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Jean de Villenfagne 52,60 %
15 NS 3S W-5 250 15.4 70.00
16 NS 2P N = 110 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 72,50 %
a.1 Aida Zumot -Marie J. de Wagheneire 44,83 %
17 NS 4C E = -420 9.9 45.00
18 NS 4P S+1 650 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a14 Chantal Huybrechts. -Marie-Catherine Beer 30,08 %
19 NS 4P W = -620 14.3 65.00
20 NS 3T E-3 300 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
a13 Michel Lievens -Annie Zeimes 50,81 %
21 NS 3P W = -140 14.3 65.00
22 NS 4K N-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a11 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver 53,95 %
23 NS 4C E+3 -710 14 63.64
24 NS 1S E-3 150 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a10 Olivier Paternostre -Diane Emsens 50,25 %
25 NS 5K W+1 -620 22 100.00
26 NS 3P N+2 200 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.9 Luc Cartuyvels -Lydia Wildiers 58,10 %
27 NS 4C S = 420 13.2 60.00
28 NS 3S E+1 -430 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
Total : 306,1 / 528 = 57,97 %
PAIRE A13 Christine Defraigne -Michele Berrier
a11 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver 53,95 %
1 NS 4P N+1 450 9.9 45.00
2 NS 4P E+1 -450 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
a10 Olivier Paternostre -Diane Emsens 50,25 %
3 NS 2C S = 110 21.9 99.55
4 NS 1S E-1 100 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 94,55 %
a.9 Luc Cartuyvels -Lydia Wildiers 58,10 %
5 NS 3C W-1 50 12.1 55.00
6 NS 4C S = 420 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a.8 Catherine de Moffarts -Jeannine Wanderpepen 50,56 %
7 NS 5P S = 650 12.1 55.00
8 NS 3S E-1 50 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.7 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 58,56 %
9 NS 3T S+4 190 0.1 0.45
10 NS 3C N-1 -100 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 12,73 %
a.5 Christiane Huby -Myriam de Timary 40,54 %
11 NS 3P S = 140 15.4 70.00
12 NS 3P W+2 -200 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 67,50 %
a.4 Serge Alard -Noelle Fosse 55,08 %
13 NS 3S S = 600 16.5 75.00
14 NS 3C E-1 50 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 72,50 %
a.3 Francis Rittweger -Hugo Baetens 58,08 %
15 NS 3K S+2 150 7.7 35.00
16 NS 4P N-1 -50 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
a.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Jean de Villenfagne 52,60 %
17 NS 3C E+2 -200 17.5 79.55
18 NS 4P S+1 650 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 82,05 %
a.1 Aida Zumot -Marie J. de Wagheneire 44,83 %
19 NS 4P W+1 -650 5.5 25.00
20 NS 3C E-1 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
a13 Michel Lievens -Annie Zeimes 50,81 %
25 NS 3S W+3 -690 5 22.73
26 NS 3S S = 600 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a12 Antoinette Goffin -Nicole Louette 51,05 %
27 NS 4C S+2 480 21.9 99.55
28 NS 3S E-2 100 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 99,55 %
Total : 303,6 / 528 = 57,50 %
PAIRE A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois
a.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Jean de Villenfagne 52,60 %
3 NS 2K W = -90 5.5 25.00
4 NS 2K W = -90 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
a.1 Aida Zumot -Marie J. de Wagheneire 44,83 %
5 NS 3P N-1 -100 5.5 25.00
6 NS 4C S+1 450 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
a14 Chantal Huybrechts. -Marie-Catherine Beer 30,08 %
7 NS 5P S = 650 12.1 55.00
8 NS 3S E-1 50 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a13 Michel Lievens -Annie Zeimes 50,81 %
9 NS 3S N+4 520 13.2 60.00
10 NS 3TcW-2 500 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
a12 Antoinette Goffin -Nicole Louette 51,05 %
11 NS 3P S = 140 15.4 70.00
12 NS 4P W = -420 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a11 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver 53,95 %
13 NS 3S S+1 630 21.9 99.55
14 NS 3C E-2 100 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 99,55 %
a10 Olivier Paternostre -Diane Emsens 50,25 %
15 NS 3K N+2 150 7.7 35.00
16 NS 2P N+1 140 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a.8 Catherine de Moffarts -Jeannine Wanderpepen 50,56 %
17 NS 4KcS-4 -800 0.1 0.45
18 NS 6PcS-1 -200 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 2,95 %
a.7 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 58,56 %
19 NS 4P W+1 -650 5.5 25.00
20 NS 3T S = 110 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.6 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 45,43 %
21 NS 3P W = -140 14.3 65.00
22 NS 4K N-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a.5 Christiane Huby -Myriam de Timary 40,54 %
23 NS 4C E+2 -680 18 81.82
24 NS 2C N = 110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a.4 Serge Alard -Noelle Fosse 55,08 %
25 NS 3S W+2 -660 17 77.27
26 NS 3P N+3 230 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
Total : 298,8 / 528 = 56,59 %
PAIRE A.9 Jean Chabotier -Michel Paquot
a.3 Francis Rittweger -Hugo Baetens 58,08 %
1 NS 4P N+2 480 18.6 84.55
2 NS 4P E+1 -450 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
a.1 Aida Zumot -Marie J. de Wagheneire 44,83 %
3 NS 3K W-1 100 15.4 70.00
4 NS 2K W+1 -110 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a14 Chantal Huybrechts. -Marie-Catherine Beer 30,08 %
5 NS 2P N = 110 18.6 84.55
6 NS 5T N+1 420 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a13 Michel Lievens -Annie Zeimes 50,81 %
7 NS 6P S-1 -100 2.3 10.45
8 NS 3S E-3 150 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a12 Antoinette Goffin -Nicole Louette 51,05 %
9 NS 6T S+1 940 18.6 84.55
10 NS 1PcE+1 -360 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a11 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver 53,95 %
11 NS 2P S+1 140 15.4 70.00
12 NS 4P W+1 -450 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.9 Luc Cartuyvels -Lydia Wildiers 58,10 %
17 NS 4C W = -420 9.9 45.00
18 NS 6P S-1 -100 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a.8 Catherine de Moffarts -Jeannine Wanderpepen 50,56 %
19 NS 3P W+2 -200 18.6 84.55
20 NS 3C E-2 200 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 82,05 %
a.7 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 58,56 %
21 NS 3P W = -140 14.3 65.00
22 NS 3P E = -140 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a.6 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 45,43 %
23 NS 6C E = -1430 11 50.00
24 NS 2P E-3 150 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.5 Christiane Huby -Myriam de Timary 40,54 %
25 NS 3S W+2 -660 17 77.27
26 NS 4P N+1 650 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
a.4 Serge Alard -Noelle Fosse 55,08 %
27 NS 4C S-1 -50 2.3 10.45
28 NS 3S E = -400 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
Total : 288,0 / 528 = 54,55 %
PAIRE A.8 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere
a14 Chantal Huybrechts. -Marie-Catherine Beer 30,08 %
1 NS 4P S+1 450 9.9 45.00
2 NS 4P E-1 50 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a13 Michel Lievens -Annie Zeimes 50,81 %
3 NS 1S E+2 -150 0.1 0.45
4 NS 2K W = -90 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a12 Antoinette Goffin -Nicole Louette 51,05 %
5 NS 3P N-1 -100 5.5 25.00
6 NS 4C S+1 450 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
a11 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver 53,95 %
7 NS 5P S = 650 12.1 55.00
8 NS 4P W-1 50 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a10 Olivier Paternostre -Diane Emsens 50,25 %
9 NS 5T S+2 440 7.7 35.00
10 NS 2C N+1 140 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.8 Catherine de Moffarts -Jeannine Wanderpepen 50,56 %
15 NS 4K N+1 150 7.7 35.00
16 NS 3P N-1 -50 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
a.7 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 58,56 %
17 NS 4C E = -420 9.9 45.00
18 NS 3P S+2 200 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a.6 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 45,43 %
19 NS 3P W+2 -200 18.6 84.55
20 NS 4C E-3 300 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
a.5 Christiane Huby -Myriam de Timary 40,54 %
21 NS 2C E+1 -140 14.3 65.00
22 NS 4K N-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a.4 Serge Alard -Noelle Fosse 55,08 %
23 NS 4P E-3 300 22 100.00
24 NS 1S E = -90 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.3 Francis Rittweger -Hugo Baetens 58,08 %
25 NS 3S W+3 -690 5 22.73
26 NS 2P N+2 170 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Jean de Villenfagne 52,60 %
27 NS 4P W-1 50 6.6 30.00
28 NS 3S E = -400 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
Total : 261,4 / 528 = 49,51 %
PAIRE A.7 Ines Drory -Elena Valsesia
a12 Antoinette Goffin -Nicole Louette 51,05 %
1 NS 4P N+2 480 18.6 84.55
2 NS 4P E+1 -450 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
a11 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver 53,95 %
3 NS 2K W = -90 5.5 25.00
4 NS 2K W = -90 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
a10 Olivier Paternostre -Diane Emsens 50,25 %
5 NS 4C W-3 150 21.9 99.55
6 NS 3C S+1 170 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a.9 Luc Cartuyvels -Lydia Wildiers 58,10 %
7 NS 5P S = 650 12.1 55.00
8 NS 3S E+2 -460 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a.7 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 58,56 %
13 NS 1S S+2 150 5.5 25.00
14 NS 4T S-2 -100 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
a.6 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 45,43 %
15 NS 5KcN+1 950 21.9 99.55
16 NS 2S S-1 -50 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
a.5 Christiane Huby -Myriam de Timary 40,54 %
17 NS 4C E = -420 9.9 45.00
18 NS 4P S+1 650 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a.4 Serge Alard -Noelle Fosse 55,08 %
19 NS 4P W+1 -650 5.5 25.00
20 NS 2C E = -110 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 32,50 %
a.3 Francis Rittweger -Hugo Baetens 58,08 %
21 NS 2C E+2 -170 3.4 15.45
22 NS 4K N-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Jean de Villenfagne 52,60 %
23 NS 6C E+1 -1460 3 13.64
24 NS 2C N = 110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a.1 Aida Zumot -Marie J. de Wagheneire 44,83 %
25 NS 3S W+2 -660 17 77.27
26 NS 4P N = 620 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a13 Michel Lievens -Annie Zeimes 50,81 %
27 NS 4C S = 420 13.2 60.00
28 NS 3S E-1 50 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
Total : 260,3 / 528 = 49,30 %
PAIRE A.6 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy
a10 Olivier Paternostre -Diane Emsens 50,25 %
1 NS 3S N-2 -100 0.1 0.45
2 NS 4P E+1 -450 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
a.9 Luc Cartuyvels -Lydia Wildiers 58,10 %
3 NS 2K W = -90 5.5 25.00
4 NS 1S E = -90 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
a.8 Catherine de Moffarts -Jeannine Wanderpepen 50,56 %
5 NS 2P N = 110 18.6 84.55
6 NS 3C S+3 230 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a.6 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 45,43 %
11 NS 4P S-2 -100 1.2 5.45
12 NS 3P W+1 -170 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a.5 Christiane Huby -Myriam de Timary 40,54 %
13 NS 2S S+1 150 5.5 25.00
14 NS 3C E-1 50 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.4 Serge Alard -Noelle Fosse 55,08 %
15 NS 4K N+1 150 7.7 35.00
16 NS 2S S-1 -50 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
a.3 Francis Rittweger -Hugo Baetens 58,08 %
17 NS 4C E = -420 9.9 45.00
18 NS 4P S+1 650 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Jean de Villenfagne 52,60 %
19 NS 4C E = -620 14.3 65.00
20 NS 2C E+1 -140 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.1 Aida Zumot -Marie J. de Wagheneire 44,83 %
21 NS 4K N = 130 21.9 99.55
22 NS 5KcN-2 -300 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a14 Chantal Huybrechts. -Marie-Catherine Beer 30,08 %
23 NS 3S W+2 -660 20 90.91
24 NS 3P E-4 200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 95,45 %
a12 Antoinette Goffin -Nicole Louette 51,05 %
25 NS 3S W+2 -660 17 77.27
26 NS 2P N+2 170 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a11 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver 53,95 %
27 NS 4CcS-2 -300 0.1 0.45
28 NS 3S E+1 -430 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 5,45 %
Total : 245,6 / 528 = 46,52 %
PAIRE A.4 Patrizia Vaccani -Didier Collart
a.6 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 45,43 %
1 NS 3S N-1 -50 2.3 10.45
2 NS 6P E-1 50 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.4 Serge Alard -Noelle Fosse 55,08 %
7 NS 4P S+1 650 12.1 55.00
8 NS 3S E = -400 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a.3 Francis Rittweger -Hugo Baetens 58,08 %
9 NS 3S N+1 430 3.4 15.45
10 NS 3C N = 140 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
a.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Jean de Villenfagne 52,60 %
11 NS 4P S-1 -50 5.5 25.00
12 NS 3CcN-2 -500 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 12,73 %
a.1 Aida Zumot -Marie J. de Wagheneire 44,83 %
13 NS 1S S+2 150 5.5 25.00
14 NS 4C E-1 50 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a14 Chantal Huybrechts. -Marie-Catherine Beer 30,08 %
15 NS 5K N+1 620 17.5 79.55
16 NS 3S S-2 -100 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a13 Michel Lievens -Annie Zeimes 50,81 %
17 NS 3C E+1 -170 19.7 89.55
18 NS 3P S+2 200 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a12 Antoinette Goffin -Nicole Louette 51,05 %
19 NS 3S W-2 200 21.9 99.55
20 NS 2C E+2 -170 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a10 Olivier Paternostre -Diane Emsens 50,25 %
21 NS 1C E+3 -170 3.4 15.45
22 NS 4K N-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a.9 Luc Cartuyvels -Lydia Wildiers 58,10 %
23 NS 3S W+3 -690 16 72.73
24 NS 2C N = 110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.8 Catherine de Moffarts -Jeannine Wanderpepen 50,56 %
25 NS 3S W+3 -690 5 22.73
26 NS 4P N+1 650 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.7 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 58,56 %
27 NS 4C S = 420 13.2 60.00
28 NS 3S E = -400 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
Total : 242,5 / 528 = 45,93 %
PAIRE A.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Francoise Turin
a.1 Aida Zumot -Marie J. de Wagheneire 44,83 %
1 NS 4P S = 420 4.5 20.45
2 NS 4P E+1 -450 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a14 Chantal Huybrechts. -Marie-Catherine Beer 30,08 %
3 NS 3S W-1 100 15.4 70.00
4 NS 3S E-2 200 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
a13 Michel Lievens -Annie Zeimes 50,81 %
5 NS 3P N-1 -100 5.5 25.00
6 NS 4C S+1 450 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
a12 Antoinette Goffin -Nicole Louette 51,05 %
7 NS 6PcS-1 -200 0.1 0.45
8 NS 3S E-1 50 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a11 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver 53,95 %
9 NS 3S S+4 520 13.2 60.00
10 NS 4C N-2 -200 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
a10 Olivier Paternostre -Diane Emsens 50,25 %
11 NS 3P S = 140 15.4 70.00
12 NS 4P W+2 -480 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
a.9 Luc Cartuyvels -Lydia Wildiers 58,10 %
13 NS 3S S = 600 16.5 75.00
14 NS 3TcS-1 -100 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.7 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 58,56 %
15 NS 4KcN+1 910 19.7 89.55
16 NS 2K S+1 110 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
a.6 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 45,43 %
17 NS 4C E = -420 9.9 45.00
18 NS 6PcS-1 -200 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a.5 Christiane Huby -Myriam de Timary 40,54 %
19 NS 4P W+1 -650 5.5 25.00
20 NS 3C E = -140 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a.4 Serge Alard -Noelle Fosse 55,08 %
21 NS 2C E+2 -170 3.4 15.45
22 NS 3K N = 110 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.3 Francis Rittweger -Hugo Baetens 58,08 %
23 NS 6C W+1 -1460 3 13.64
24 NS 2C N+1 140 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
Total : 242,5 / 528 = 45,93 %
PAIRE A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens
a.3 Francis Rittweger -Hugo Baetens 58,08 %
5 NS 3P N-1 -100 5.5 25.00
6 NS 4C S-1 -50 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
a.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Jean de Villenfagne 52,60 %
7 NS 4P S+1 650 12.1 55.00
8 NS 4C E-2 100 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
a.1 Aida Zumot -Marie J. de Wagheneire 44,83 %
9 NS 6T S+1 940 18.6 84.55
10 NS 3C N-1 -100 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 54,77 %
a14 Chantal Huybrechts. -Marie-Catherine Beer 30,08 %
11 NS 3P S = 140 15.4 70.00
12 NS 3S W-4 200 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
a13 Michel Lievens -Annie Zeimes 50,81 %
13 NS 2K S+2 130 0.1 0.45
14 NS 3C E-1 50 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
a12 Antoinette Goffin -Nicole Louette 51,05 %
15 NS 3K N+2 150 7.7 35.00
16 NS 4P N-2 -100 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
a11 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver 53,95 %
17 NS 4C E+1 -450 2.3 10.45
18 NS 3P S+2 200 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a.9 Luc Cartuyvels -Lydia Wildiers 58,10 %
19 NS 4P W+1 -650 5.5 25.00
20 NS 2C E+2 -170 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
a.8 Catherine de Moffarts -Jeannine Wanderpepen 50,56 %
21 NS 3P E = -140 14.3 65.00
22 NS 4K N-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a.7 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 58,56 %
23 NS 6C E+1 -1460 3 13.64
24 NS 1S E = -90 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
a.6 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 45,43 %
25 NS 3S W+3 -690 5 22.73
26 NS 3S S+1 630 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.5 Christiane Huby -Myriam de Timary 40,54 %
27 NS 4C S+1 450 18.6 84.55
28 NS 3S E-1 50 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 84,55 %
Total : 230,5 / 528 = 43,66 %
PAIRE A12 Gerard Cooreman -Helene Christiaens
a.9 Luc Cartuyvels -Lydia Wildiers 58,10 %
1 NS 4P N+1 450 9.9 45.00
2 NS 4P E+1 -450 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
a.8 Catherine de Moffarts -Jeannine Wanderpepen 50,56 %
3 NS 3K W-1 100 15.4 70.00
4 NS 1S E = -90 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a.7 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 58,56 %
5 NS 3C W-1 50 12.1 55.00
6 NS 3P N+1 170 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a.6 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 45,43 %
7 NS 5P S = 650 12.1 55.00
8 NS 3S E-1 50 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.4 Serge Alard -Noelle Fosse 55,08 %
9 NS 3S S+1 430 3.4 15.45
10 NS 2C N = 110 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a.3 Francis Rittweger -Hugo Baetens 58,08 %
11 NS 4P S-1 -50 5.5 25.00
12 NS 4P W+1 -450 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 27,50 %
a.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Jean de Villenfagne 52,60 %
13 NS 1S S+2 150 5.5 25.00
14 NS 3C W = -140 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
a.1 Aida Zumot -Marie J. de Wagheneire 44,83 %
15 NS 4K N+1 150 7.7 35.00
16 NS 3S S = 400 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a14 Chantal Huybrechts. -Marie-Catherine Beer 30,08 %
17 NS 4P W-1 50 21.9 99.55
18 NS 3S N+1 630 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
a12 Antoinette Goffin -Nicole Louette 51,05 %
23 NS 6C E = -1430 11 50.00
24 NS 1S E-1 50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a11 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver 53,95 %
25 NS 3S W+3 -690 5 22.73
26 NS 3S S-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
a10 Olivier Paternostre -Diane Emsens 50,25 %
27 NS 4P W-1 50 6.6 30.00
28 NS 3S E = -400 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
Total : 222,2 / 528 = 42,08 %
PAIRE A10 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten
a.5 Christiane Huby -Myriam de Timary 40,54 %
1 NS 4P N+1 450 9.9 45.00
2 NS 6P E-1 50 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a.4 Serge Alard -Noelle Fosse 55,08 %
3 NS 2K W = -90 5.5 25.00
4 NS 1S E = -90 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
a.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Jean de Villenfagne 52,60 %
5 NS 4PcN-3 -800 0.1 0.45
6 NS 3C S+1 170 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
a.1 Aida Zumot -Marie J. de Wagheneire 44,83 %
7 NS 5P S = 650 12.1 55.00
8 NS 3S E-2 100 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
a14 Chantal Huybrechts. -Marie-Catherine Beer 30,08 %
9 NS 3S S+4 520 13.2 60.00
10 NS 2C N = 110 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a13 Michel Lievens -Annie Zeimes 50,81 %
11 NS 4P S-2 -100 1.2 5.45
12 NS 3P W+2 -200 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
a12 Antoinette Goffin -Nicole Louette 51,05 %
13 NS 3S S = 600 16.5 75.00
14 NS 2P N-3 -150 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a10 Olivier Paternostre -Diane Emsens 50,25 %
19 NS 4P W+1 -650 5.5 25.00
20 NS 2P N = 110 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.9 Luc Cartuyvels -Lydia Wildiers 58,10 %
21 NS 2P E+2 -170 3.4 15.45
22 NS 4K N-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a.8 Catherine de Moffarts -Jeannine Wanderpepen 50,56 %
23 NS 6S W = -1440 8 36.36
24 NS 1S E = -90 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.7 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille 58,56 %
25 NS 3S W+3 -690 5 22.73
26 NS 3P N = 140 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
a.6 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 45,43 %
27 NS 4P W-1 50 6.6 30.00
28 NS 3S E = -400 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
Total : 206,4 / 528 = 39,09 %
PAIRE A14 -
a13 Michel Lievens -Annie Zeimes 50,81 %
1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a12 Antoinette Goffin -Nicole Louette 51,05 %
3 NS BYE 0 0.00
4 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a11 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver 53,95 %
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a10 Olivier Paternostre -Diane Emsens 50,25 %
7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.9 Luc Cartuyvels -Lydia Wildiers 58,10 %
9 NS BYE 0 0.00
10 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.8 Catherine de Moffarts -Jeannine Wanderpepen 50,56 %
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.6 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie 45,43 %
13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.5 Christiane Huby -Myriam de Timary 40,54 %
15 NS BYE 0 0.00
16 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.4 Serge Alard -Noelle Fosse 55,08 %
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.3 Francis Rittweger -Hugo Baetens 58,08 %
19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Jean de Villenfagne 52,60 %
21 NS BYE 0 0.00
22 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a14 Chantal Huybrechts. -Marie-Catherine Beer 30,08 %
27 NS BYE 0 0.00
28 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 616 = 0,00 %
PAIRE a.7 Elie Behaghel -Diane della Faille
A11 Patrick Gilles -Philippe Dekandelaer 61,17 %
1 EO 4P N+2 480 3.4 15.45
2 EO 6P E-1 50 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 15,45 %
A.5 Colette Heerinckx -Eliane de Ceuninck 57,97 %
3 EO 2K W-1 100 6.6 30.00
4 EO 2K W+1 -110 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A12 Gerard Cooreman -Helene Christiaens 42,08 %
5 EO 3C W-1 50 9.9 45.00
6 EO 3P N+1 170 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A13 Christine Defraigne -Michele Berrier 57,50 %
9 EO 3T S+4 190 21.9 99.55
10 EO 3C N-1 -100 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 87,27 %
A.7 Ines Drory -Elena Valsesia 49,30 %
13 EO 1S S+2 150 16.5 75.00
14 EO 4T S-2 -100 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
A.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Francoise Turin 45,93 %
15 EO 4KcN+1 910 2.3 10.45
16 EO 2K S+1 110 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
A.8 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 49,51 %
17 EO 4C E = -420 12.1 55.00
18 EO 3P S+2 200 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 56,59 %
19 EO 4P W+1 -650 16.5 75.00
20 EO 3T S = 110 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.9 Jean Chabotier -Michel Paquot 54,55 %
21 EO 3P W = -140 7.7 35.00
22 EO 3P E = -140 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 43,66 %
23 EO 6C E+1 -1460 19 86.36
24 EO 1S E = -90 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
A10 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 39,09 %
25 EO 3S W+3 -690 17 77.27
26 EO 3P N = 140 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
A.4 Patrizia Vaccani -Didier Collart 45,93 %
27 EO 4C S = 420 8.8 40.00
28 EO 3S E = -400 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
Total : 309,2 / 528 = 58,56 %
PAIRE a.9 Luc Cartuyvels -Lydia Wildiers
A12 Gerard Cooreman -Helene Christiaens 42,08 %
1 EO 4P N+1 450 12.1 55.00
2 EO 4P E+1 -450 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
A.6 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy 46,52 %
3 EO 2K W = -90 16.5 75.00
4 EO 1S E = -90 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
A13 Christine Defraigne -Michele Berrier 57,50 %
5 EO 3C W-1 50 9.9 45.00
6 EO 4C S = 420 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A.7 Ines Drory -Elena Valsesia 49,30 %
7 EO 5P S = 650 9.9 45.00
8 EO 3S E+2 -460 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A14 - 0,00 %
9 EO BYE 0 0.00
10 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Francoise Turin 45,93 %
13 EO 3S S = 600 5.5 25.00
14 EO 3TcS-1 -100 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.9 Jean Chabotier -Michel Paquot 54,55 %
17 EO 4C W = -420 12.1 55.00
18 EO 6P S-1 -100 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 43,66 %
19 EO 4P W+1 -650 16.5 75.00
20 EO 2C E+2 -170 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
A10 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 39,09 %
21 EO 2P E+2 -170 18.6 84.55
22 EO 4K N-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A.4 Patrizia Vaccani -Didier Collart 45,93 %
23 EO 3S W+3 -690 6 27.27
24 EO 2C N = 110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A11 Patrick Gilles -Philippe Dekandelaer 61,17 %
25 EO 4P E+2 -680 10 45.45
26 EO 3S S+1 630 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.5 Colette Heerinckx -Eliane de Ceuninck 57,97 %
27 EO 4C S = 420 8.8 40.00
28 EO 3S E+1 -430 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
Total : 281,2 / 484 = 58,10 %
PAIRE a.3 Francis Rittweger -Hugo Baetens
A.9 Jean Chabotier -Michel Paquot 54,55 %
1 EO 4P N+2 480 3.4 15.45
2 EO 4P E+1 -450 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 43,66 %
5 EO 3P N-1 -100 16.5 75.00
6 EO 4C S-1 -50 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
A11 Patrick Gilles -Philippe Dekandelaer 61,17 %
7 EO 3S S+2 660 0.1 0.45
8 EO 3S E-1 50 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A.4 Patrizia Vaccani -Didier Collart 45,93 %
9 EO 3S N+1 430 18.6 84.55
10 EO 3C N = 140 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
A12 Gerard Cooreman -Helene Christiaens 42,08 %
11 EO 4P S-1 -50 16.5 75.00
12 EO 4P W+1 -450 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 72,50 %
A.5 Colette Heerinckx -Eliane de Ceuninck 57,97 %
13 EO 3S S = 600 5.5 25.00
14 EO 3C W = -140 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 54,77 %
A13 Christine Defraigne -Michele Berrier 57,50 %
15 EO 3K S+2 150 14.3 65.00
16 EO 4P N-1 -50 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
A.6 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy 46,52 %
17 EO 4C E = -420 12.1 55.00
18 EO 4P S+1 650 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A14 - 0,00 %
19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.7 Ines Drory -Elena Valsesia 49,30 %
21 EO 2C E+2 -170 18.6 84.55
22 EO 4K N-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Francoise Turin 45,93 %
23 EO 6C W+1 -1460 19 86.36
24 EO 2C N+1 140 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.8 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 49,51 %
25 EO 3S W+3 -690 17 77.27
26 EO 2P N+2 170 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
Total : 281,1 / 484 = 58,08 %
PAIRE a.4 Serge Alard -Noelle Fosse
A10 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 39,09 %
3 EO 2K W = -90 16.5 75.00
4 EO 1S E = -90 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
A.4 Patrizia Vaccani -Didier Collart 45,93 %
7 EO 4P S+1 650 9.9 45.00
8 EO 3S E = -400 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A12 Gerard Cooreman -Helene Christiaens 42,08 %
9 EO 3S S+1 430 18.6 84.55
10 EO 2C N = 110 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A.5 Colette Heerinckx -Eliane de Ceuninck 57,97 %
11 EO 3P S = 140 6.6 30.00
12 EO 4P W+1 -450 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A13 Christine Defraigne -Michele Berrier 57,50 %
13 EO 3S S = 600 5.5 25.00
14 EO 3C E-1 50 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 27,50 %
A.6 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy 46,52 %
15 EO 4K N+1 150 14.3 65.00
16 EO 2S S-1 -50 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
A14 - 0,00 %
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.7 Ines Drory -Elena Valsesia 49,30 %
19 EO 4P W+1 -650 16.5 75.00
20 EO 2C E = -110 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 67,50 %
A.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Francoise Turin 45,93 %
21 EO 2C E+2 -170 18.6 84.55
22 EO 3K N = 110 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.8 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 49,51 %
23 EO 4P E-3 300 0 0.00
24 EO 1S E = -90 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 56,59 %
25 EO 3S W+2 -660 5 22.73
26 EO 3P N+3 230 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.9 Jean Chabotier -Michel Paquot 54,55 %
27 EO 4C S-1 -50 19.7 89.55
28 EO 3S E = -400 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
Total : 266,6 / 484 = 55,08 %
PAIRE a11 Philippe Leemans -Jean Marie Schmiliver
A13 Christine Defraigne -Michele Berrier 57,50 %
1 EO 4P N+1 450 12.1 55.00
2 EO 4P E+1 -450 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
A.7 Ines Drory -Elena Valsesia 49,30 %
3 EO 2K W = -90 16.5 75.00
4 EO 2K W = -90 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
A14 - 0,00 %
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.8 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 49,51 %
7 EO 5P S = 650 9.9 45.00
8 EO 4P W-1 50 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Francoise Turin 45,93 %
9 EO 3S S+4 520 8.8 40.00
10 EO 4C N-2 -200 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A.9 Jean Chabotier -Michel Paquot 54,55 %
11 EO 2P S+1 140 6.6 30.00
12 EO 4P W+1 -450 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 56,59 %
13 EO 3S S+1 630 0.1 0.45
14 EO 3C E-2 100 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 0,45 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 43,66 %
17 EO 4C E+1 -450 19.7 89.55
18 EO 3P S+2 200 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A11 Patrick Gilles -Philippe Dekandelaer 61,17 %
21 EO 2C E+1 -140 7.7 35.00
22 EO 2K N+1 110 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
A.5 Colette Heerinckx -Eliane de Ceuninck 57,97 %
23 EO 4C E+3 -710 8 36.36
24 EO 1S E-3 150 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A12 Gerard Cooreman -Helene Christiaens 42,08 %
25 EO 3S W+3 -690 17 77.27
26 EO 3S S-2 -200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
A.6 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy 46,52 %
27 EO 4CcS-2 -300 21.9 99.55
28 EO 3S E+1 -430 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 94,55 %
Total : 261,1 / 484 = 53,95 %
PAIRE a.2 Gaetan van de Werve -Jean de Villenfagne
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 56,59 %
3 EO 2K W = -90 16.5 75.00
4 EO 2K W = -90 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
A10 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 39,09 %
5 EO 4PcN-3 -800 21.9 99.55
6 EO 3C S+1 170 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 43,66 %
7 EO 4P S+1 650 9.9 45.00
8 EO 4C E-2 100 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
A11 Patrick Gilles -Philippe Dekandelaer 61,17 %
9 EO 7T S = 1440 0.1 0.45
10 EO 3T W-2 200 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 5,45 %
A.4 Patrizia Vaccani -Didier Collart 45,93 %
11 EO 4P S-1 -50 16.5 75.00
12 EO 3CcN-2 -500 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 87,27 %
A12 Gerard Cooreman -Helene Christiaens 42,08 %
13 EO 1S S+2 150 16.5 75.00
14 EO 3C W = -140 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
A.5 Colette Heerinckx -Eliane de Ceuninck 57,97 %
15 EO 3S W-5 250 6.6 30.00
16 EO 2P N = 110 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 27,50 %
A13 Christine Defraigne -Michele Berrier 57,50 %
17 EO 3C E+2 -200 4.5 20.45
18 EO 4P S+1 650 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 17,95 %
A.6 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy 46,52 %
19 EO 4C E = -620 7.7 35.00
20 EO 2C E+1 -140 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A14 - 0,00 %
21 EO BYE 0 0.00
22 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.7 Ines Drory -Elena Valsesia 49,30 %
23 EO 6C E+1 -1460 19 86.36
24 EO 2C N = 110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A.8 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 49,51 %
27 EO 4P W-1 50 15.4 70.00
28 EO 3S E = -400 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
Total : 254,6 / 484 = 52,60 %
PAIRE a12 Antoinette Goffin -Nicole Louette
A.7 Ines Drory -Elena Valsesia 49,30 %
1 EO 4P N+2 480 3.4 15.45
2 EO 4P E+1 -450 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
A14 - 0,00 %
3 EO BYE 0 0.00
4 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.8 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 49,51 %
5 EO 3P N-1 -100 16.5 75.00
6 EO 4C S+1 450 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
A.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Francoise Turin 45,93 %
7 EO 6PcS-1 -200 21.9 99.55
8 EO 3S E-1 50 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.9 Jean Chabotier -Michel Paquot 54,55 %
9 EO 6T S+1 940 3.4 15.45
10 EO 1PcE+1 -360 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 56,59 %
11 EO 3P S = 140 6.6 30.00
12 EO 4P W = -420 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A10 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 39,09 %
13 EO 3S S = 600 5.5 25.00
14 EO 2P N-3 -150 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 43,66 %
15 EO 3K N+2 150 14.3 65.00
16 EO 4P N-2 -100 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
A.4 Patrizia Vaccani -Didier Collart 45,93 %
19 EO 3S W-2 200 0.1 0.45
20 EO 2C E+2 -170 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A12 Gerard Cooreman -Helene Christiaens 42,08 %
23 EO 6C E = -1430 11 50.00
24 EO 1S E-1 50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A.6 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy 46,52 %
25 EO 3S W+2 -660 5 22.73
26 EO 2P N+2 170 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A13 Christine Defraigne -Michele Berrier 57,50 %
27 EO 4C S+2 480 0.1 0.45
28 EO 3S E-2 100 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 0,45 %
Total : 247,1 / 484 = 51,05 %
PAIRE a13 Michel Lievens -Annie Zeimes
A14 - 0,00 %
1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.8 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 49,51 %
3 EO 1S E+2 -150 21.9 99.55
4 EO 2K W = -90 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Francoise Turin 45,93 %
5 EO 3P N-1 -100 16.5 75.00
6 EO 4C S+1 450 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
A.9 Jean Chabotier -Michel Paquot 54,55 %
7 EO 6P S-1 -100 19.7 89.55
8 EO 3S E-3 150 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 56,59 %
9 EO 3S N+4 520 8.8 40.00
10 EO 3TcW-2 500 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
A10 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 39,09 %
11 EO 4P S-2 -100 20.8 94.55
12 EO 3P W+2 -200 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 43,66 %
13 EO 2K S+2 130 21.9 99.55
14 EO 3C E-1 50 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A11 Patrick Gilles -Philippe Dekandelaer 61,17 %
15 EO 3P E-2 100 21.9 99.55
16 EO 2S S-1 -50 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
A.4 Patrizia Vaccani -Didier Collart 45,93 %
17 EO 3C E+1 -170 2.3 10.45
18 EO 3P S+2 200 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A.5 Colette Heerinckx -Eliane de Ceuninck 57,97 %
21 EO 3P W = -140 7.7 35.00
22 EO 4K N-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A13 Christine Defraigne -Michele Berrier 57,50 %
25 EO 3S W+3 -690 17 77.27
26 EO 3S S = 600 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A.7 Ines Drory -Elena Valsesia 49,30 %
27 EO 4C S = 420 8.8 40.00
28 EO 3S E-1 50 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
Total : 245,9 / 484 = 50,81 %
PAIRE a.8 Catherine de Moffarts -Jeannine Wanderpepen
A.5 Colette Heerinckx -Eliane de Ceuninck 57,97 %
1 EO 4P S+2 480 3.4 15.45
2 EO 4P E+1 -450 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
A12 Gerard Cooreman -Helene Christiaens 42,08 %
3 EO 3K W-1 100 6.6 30.00
4 EO 1S E = -90 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A.6 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy 46,52 %
5 EO 2P N = 110 3.4 15.45
6 EO 3C S+3 230 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A13 Christine Defraigne -Michele Berrier 57,50 %
7 EO 5P S = 650 9.9 45.00
8 EO 3S E-1 50 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A14 - 0,00 %
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.8 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 49,51 %
15 EO 4K N+1 150 14.3 65.00
16 EO 3P N-1 -50 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 56,59 %
17 EO 4KcS-4 -800 21.9 99.55
18 EO 6PcS-1 -200 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 97,05 %
A.9 Jean Chabotier -Michel Paquot 54,55 %
19 EO 3P W+2 -200 3.4 15.45
20 EO 3C E-2 200 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 17,95 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 43,66 %
21 EO 3P E = -140 7.7 35.00
22 EO 4K N-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A10 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 39,09 %
23 EO 6S W = -1440 14 63.64
24 EO 1S E = -90 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.4 Patrizia Vaccani -Didier Collart 45,93 %
25 EO 3S W+3 -690 17 77.27
26 EO 4P N+1 650 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A11 Patrick Gilles -Philippe Dekandelaer 61,17 %
27 EO 5C S = 450 3.4 15.45
28 EO 3S E+1 -430 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
Total : 244,7 / 484 = 50,56 %
PAIRE a10 Olivier Paternostre -Diane Emsens
A.6 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy 46,52 %
1 EO 3S N-2 -100 21.9 99.55
2 EO 4P E+1 -450 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
A13 Christine Defraigne -Michele Berrier 57,50 %
3 EO 2C S = 110 0.1 0.45
4 EO 1S E-1 100 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 5,45 %
A.7 Ines Drory -Elena Valsesia 49,30 %
5 EO 4C W-3 150 0.1 0.45
6 EO 3C S+1 170 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A14 - 0,00 %
7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.8 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 49,51 %
9 EO 5T S+2 440 14.3 65.00
10 EO 2C N+1 140 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Francoise Turin 45,93 %
11 EO 3P S = 140 6.6 30.00
12 EO 4P W+2 -480 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 56,59 %
15 EO 3K N+2 150 14.3 65.00
16 EO 2P N+1 140 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A10 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 39,09 %
19 EO 4P W+1 -650 16.5 75.00
20 EO 2P N = 110 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.4 Patrizia Vaccani -Didier Collart 45,93 %
21 EO 1C E+3 -170 18.6 84.55
22 EO 4K N-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A11 Patrick Gilles -Philippe Dekandelaer 61,17 %
23 EO 6C E+1 -1460 19 86.36
24 EO 2C N = 110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A.5 Colette Heerinckx -Eliane de Ceuninck 57,97 %
25 EO 5K W+1 -620 0 0.00
26 EO 3P N+2 200 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A12 Gerard Cooreman -Helene Christiaens 42,08 %
27 EO 4P W-1 50 15.4 70.00
28 EO 3S E = -400 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
Total : 243,2 / 484 = 50,25 %
PAIRE a.6 Claire Derieuw -Dominique Bourgoignie
A.4 Patrizia Vaccani -Didier Collart 45,93 %
1 EO 3S N-1 -50 19.7 89.55
2 EO 6P E-1 50 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A11 Patrick Gilles -Philippe Dekandelaer 61,17 %
3 EO 3K W-1 100 6.6 30.00
4 EO 2K W = -90 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A12 Gerard Cooreman -Helene Christiaens 42,08 %
7 EO 5P S = 650 9.9 45.00
8 EO 3S E-1 50 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.6 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy 46,52 %
11 EO 4P S-2 -100 20.8 94.55
12 EO 3P W+1 -170 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A14 - 0,00 %
13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.7 Ines Drory -Elena Valsesia 49,30 %
15 EO 5KcN+1 950 0.1 0.45
16 EO 2S S-1 -50 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
A.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Francoise Turin 45,93 %
17 EO 4C E = -420 12.1 55.00
18 EO 6PcS-1 -200 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A.8 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 49,51 %
19 EO 3P W+2 -200 3.4 15.45
20 EO 4C E-3 300 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 56,59 %
21 EO 3P W = -140 7.7 35.00
22 EO 4K N-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A.9 Jean Chabotier -Michel Paquot 54,55 %
23 EO 6C E = -1430 11 50.00
24 EO 2P E-3 150 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 43,66 %
25 EO 3S W+3 -690 17 77.27
26 EO 3S S+1 630 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A10 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 39,09 %
27 EO 4P W-1 50 15.4 70.00
28 EO 3S E = -400 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
Total : 219,9 / 484 = 45,43 %
PAIRE a.1 Aida Zumot -Marie J. de Wagheneire
A.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Francoise Turin 45,93 %
1 EO 4P S = 420 17.5 79.55
2 EO 4P E+1 -450 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A.9 Jean Chabotier -Michel Paquot 54,55 %
3 EO 3K W-1 100 6.6 30.00
4 EO 2K W+1 -110 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 56,59 %
5 EO 3P N-1 -100 16.5 75.00
6 EO 4C S+1 450 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
A10 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 39,09 %
7 EO 5P S = 650 9.9 45.00
8 EO 3S E-2 100 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 43,66 %
9 EO 6T S+1 940 3.4 15.45
10 EO 3C N-1 -100 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 45,23 %
A11 Patrick Gilles -Philippe Dekandelaer 61,17 %
11 EO 3P S = 140 6.6 30.00
12 EO 1T W+3 -130 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
A.4 Patrizia Vaccani -Didier Collart 45,93 %
13 EO 1S S+2 150 16.5 75.00
14 EO 4C E-1 50 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A12 Gerard Cooreman -Helene Christiaens 42,08 %
15 EO 4K N+1 150 14.3 65.00
16 EO 3S S = 400 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A.5 Colette Heerinckx -Eliane de Ceuninck 57,97 %
17 EO 4C E = -420 12.1 55.00
18 EO 4P S+1 650 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A13 Christine Defraigne -Michele Berrier 57,50 %
19 EO 4P W+1 -650 16.5 75.00
20 EO 3C E-1 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
A.6 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy 46,52 %
21 EO 4K N = 130 0.1 0.45
22 EO 5KcN-2 -300 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.7 Ines Drory -Elena Valsesia 49,30 %
25 EO 3S W+2 -660 5 22.73
26 EO 4P N = 620 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
Total : 236,7 / 528 = 44,83 %
PAIRE a.5 Christiane Huby -Myriam de Timary
A10 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 39,09 %
1 EO 4P N+1 450 12.1 55.00
2 EO 6P E-1 50 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A11 Patrick Gilles -Philippe Dekandelaer 61,17 %
5 EO 3C W-2 100 6.6 30.00
6 EO 4P N-1 -50 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A.5 Colette Heerinckx -Eliane de Ceuninck 57,97 %
9 EO 5T S+2 440 14.3 65.00
10 EO 3C N = 140 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A13 Christine Defraigne -Michele Berrier 57,50 %
11 EO 3P S = 140 6.6 30.00
12 EO 3P W+2 -200 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 32,50 %
A.6 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy 46,52 %
13 EO 2S S+1 150 16.5 75.00
14 EO 3C E-1 50 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A14 - 0,00 %
15 EO BYE 0 0.00
16 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.7 Ines Drory -Elena Valsesia 49,30 %
17 EO 4C E = -420 12.1 55.00
18 EO 4P S+1 650 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Francoise Turin 45,93 %
19 EO 4P W+1 -650 16.5 75.00
20 EO 3C E = -140 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A.8 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 49,51 %
21 EO 2C E+1 -140 7.7 35.00
22 EO 4K N-1 -50 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 56,59 %
23 EO 4C E+2 -680 4 18.18
24 EO 2C N = 110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.9 Jean Chabotier -Michel Paquot 54,55 %
25 EO 3S W+2 -660 5 22.73
26 EO 4P N+1 650 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 43,66 %
27 EO 4C S+1 450 3.4 15.45
28 EO 3S E-1 50 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 15,45 %
Total : 196,2 / 484 = 40,54 %
PAIRE a14 Chantal Huybrechts. -Marie-Catherine Beer
A.8 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 49,51 %
1 EO 4P S+1 450 12.1 55.00
2 EO 4P E-1 50 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A.1 Colette van Nieuwenhuyse -Francoise Turin 45,93 %
3 EO 3S W-1 100 6.6 30.00
4 EO 3S E-2 200 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
A.9 Jean Chabotier -Michel Paquot 54,55 %
5 EO 2P N = 110 3.4 15.45
6 EO 5T N+1 420 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A.2 Bruno Chevalier -Claire Dubois 56,59 %
7 EO 5P S = 650 9.9 45.00
8 EO 3S E-1 50 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A10 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 39,09 %
9 EO 3S S+4 520 8.8 40.00
10 EO 2C N = 110 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.3 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 43,66 %
11 EO 3P S = 140 6.6 30.00
12 EO 3S W-4 200 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
A11 Patrick Gilles -Philippe Dekandelaer 61,17 %
13 EO 1S S+3 180 11 50.00
14 EO 3C W-1 50 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A.4 Patrizia Vaccani -Didier Collart 45,93 %
15 EO 5K N+1 620 4.5 20.45
16 EO 3S S-2 -100 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A12 Gerard Cooreman -Helene Christiaens 42,08 %
17 EO 4P W-1 50 0.1 0.45
18 EO 3S N+1 630 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
A.5 Colette Heerinckx -Eliane de Ceuninck 57,97 %
19 EO 4P W = -620 7.7 35.00
20 EO 3T E-3 300 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
A.6 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy 46,52 %
23 EO 3S W+2 -660 2 9.09
24 EO 3P E-4 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 4,55 %
A14 - 0,00 %
27 EO BYE 0 0.00
28 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 145,6 / 484 = 30,08 %
|