B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 66,43 A12 Hugo Baetens -Christian Neve
--- 2 57,71 A10 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne
--- 3 57,58 A.1 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens
--- 4 55,00 A.8 Christian Meert -Sophie Noach
--- 5 54,55 A.5 Pascale Ortegat -Serge Alard
--- 6 52,67 A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh
--- 7 48,26 A.3 Anne Tirtiaux -Christiane Vroninckx
--- 8 47,33 A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten
--- 9 46,99 A13 Sylviane Delbeke -Fabienne Smit
--- 10 46,16 A.2 Colette Heerinckx -Jeannine Wanderpepen
--- 11 43,12 A.9 Claire Derieuw -Diane Deslignes
--- 12 41,71 A.4 Virginie Van Damme -Brigitte Brusselmans
--- 13 41,67 A14 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne
--- 14 40,83 A.6 Simone Munsterhjelm -Marguerite Verstraeten
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 60,72 a.9 Patrick Gilles -Francoise Duren
--- 2 59,56 a12 Gerard Cooreman -Michel Lahaut
--- 3 56,80 a.7 Francoise Nibelle -Gaetan van de Werve
--- 4 53,67 a.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart
--- 5 51,76 a.5 Lydia Wildiers -Benoit Ortegat
--- 6 51,29 a.2 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed
--- 7 50,91 a.3 Stan Tabor -Marie J. de Wagheneire
--- 8 50,25 a13 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant
--- 9 49,68 a.4 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck
--- 10 47,88 a10 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere
--- 11 42,25 a.6 Myriam de Timary -Jeannine Thys
--- 12 38,37 a11 Anne Rose Van de Werve -Nathalie de Laminne
--- 13 36,88 a.8 Marie Claire Vienne -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
--- 14 0,00 a14 -
PAIRE A12 Hugo Baetens -Christian Neve
a.9 Patrick Gilles -Francoise Duren 60,72 %
1 NS 3C S-1 -50 9.9 45.00
2 NS 2P W-1 50 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a.8 Marie Claire Vienne -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 36,88 %
3 NS 4P N = 420 16.5 75.00
4 NS 2S E-2 200 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 87,27 %
a.7 Francoise Nibelle -Gaetan van de Werve 56,80 %
5 NS 3S N-1 -100 11 50.00
6 NS 2K E-1 100 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a.6 Myriam de Timary -Jeannine Thys 42,25 %
7 NS 2K S-1 -100 11 50.00
8 NS 3S W-1 50 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a.4 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 49,68 %
9 NS 3T N = 110 2.3 10.45
10 NS 1S W-1 100 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.3 Stan Tabor -Marie J. de Wagheneire 50,91 %
11 NS 4C S-1 -50 4.5 20.45
12 NS 4C E-1 50 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
a.2 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 51,29 %
13 NS 2P W-2 200 21.9 99.55
14 NS 1C S+2 140 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 94,55 %
a.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 53,67 %
15 NS 2T E+1 -110 17.5 79.55
16 NS 2S W-2 200 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 87,05 %
a14 - 0,00 %
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a12 Gerard Cooreman -Michel Lahaut 59,56 %
23 NS 3K S = 110 12.1 55.00
24 NS 4C E+1 -450 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a11 Anne Rose Van de Werve -Nathalie de Laminne 38,37 %
25 NS 2P S = 110 14 63.64
26 NS 2S N = 120 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a10 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 47,88 %
27 NS 2T S+3 150 18.6 84.55
28 NS 1S N-1 -100 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
Total : 321,5 / 484 = 66,43 %
PAIRE A10 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne
a.5 Lydia Wildiers -Benoit Ortegat 51,76 %
1 NS 4C S-1 -50 9.9 45.00
2 NS 2P W = -110 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
a.4 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 49,68 %
3 NS 3CcE-1 200 8.8 40.00
4 NS 2S E-1 100 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a.2 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 51,29 %
5 NS 4PcE-3 500 19.7 89.55
6 NS 2S E-1 100 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 84,55 %
a.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 53,67 %
7 NS 2K S = 90 19.7 89.55
8 NS 3S W+1 -430 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a14 - 0,00 %
9 NS BYE 0 0.00
10 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a13 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 50,25 %
11 NS 4C S = 420 13.2 60.00
12 NS 4C E-1 50 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a12 Gerard Cooreman -Michel Lahaut 59,56 %
13 NS 2P W-1 100 18.6 84.55
14 NS 2C S = 110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a10 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 47,88 %
19 NS 3K N-1 -50 7.7 35.00
20 NS 4P S+2 680 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.9 Patrick Gilles -Francoise Duren 60,72 %
21 NS 3S W = -400 20 90.91
22 NS 4P E+1 -650 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a.8 Marie Claire Vienne -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 36,88 %
23 NS 3K N+2 150 19.7 89.55
24 NS 4C E-1 50 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 94,55 %
a.7 Francoise Nibelle -Gaetan van de Werve 56,80 %
25 NS 4P S-1 -50 5 22.73
26 NS 3C W+1 -170 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
a.6 Myriam de Timary -Jeannine Thys 42,25 %
27 NS 2T S+2 130 14.3 65.00
28 NS 1S N-2 -200 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
Total : 279,3 / 484 = 57,71 %
PAIRE A.1 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens
a.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 53,67 %
1 NS 5TcE-4 800 21.9 99.55
2 NS 3C N-1 -100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
a14 - 0,00 %
3 NS BYE 0 0.00
4 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a13 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 50,25 %
5 NS 3S S+1 630 21.9 99.55
6 NS 2S E-1 100 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
a12 Gerard Cooreman -Michel Lahaut 59,56 %
7 NS 1P N = 80 17.5 79.55
8 NS 3S W = -400 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a11 Anne Rose Van de Werve -Nathalie de Laminne 38,37 %
9 NS 3S S = 400 19.7 89.55
10 NS 2P N-1 -100 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a10 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 47,88 %
11 NS 4C N = 420 13.2 60.00
12 NS 4C E-1 50 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a.9 Patrick Gilles -Francoise Duren 60,72 %
13 NS 2S S-2 -200 3.4 15.45
14 NS 2C S-1 -50 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 15,45 %
a.7 Francoise Nibelle -Gaetan van de Werve 56,80 %
15 NS 3S E-1 50 20.8 94.55
16 NS 1S E = -90 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
a.6 Myriam de Timary -Jeannine Thys 42,25 %
17 NS 4P E+1 -450 1.2 5.45
18 NS 3S W-2 100 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.5 Lydia Wildiers -Benoit Ortegat 51,76 %
19 NS 3K N-1 -50 7.7 35.00
20 NS 3S S+3 690 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
a.4 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 49,68 %
21 NS 3S W+2 -460 1 4.55
22 NS 4P E+1 -650 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a.3 Stan Tabor -Marie J. de Wagheneire 50,91 %
23 NS 5C S-4 -400 2.3 10.45
24 NS 2S E+3 -210 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
Total : 278,7 / 484 = 57,58 %
PAIRE A.8 Christian Meert -Sophie Noach
a14 - 0,00 %
1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a13 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 50,25 %
3 NS 4P S-1 -50 0.1 0.45
4 NS 2S E-1 100 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a12 Gerard Cooreman -Michel Lahaut 59,56 %
5 NS 3S S-1 -100 11 50.00
6 NS 2P W+3 -200 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a11 Anne Rose Van de Werve -Nathalie de Laminne 38,37 %
7 NS 2K S-1 -100 11 50.00
8 NS 3S W-1 50 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a10 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 47,88 %
9 NS 3P W-3 300 13.2 60.00
10 NS 3S W-1 100 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
a.8 Marie Claire Vienne -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 36,88 %
15 NS 3S E = -400 12.1 55.00
16 NS 2C E-2 200 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a.7 Francoise Nibelle -Gaetan van de Werve 56,80 %
17 NS 6C W-4 200 21.9 99.55
18 NS 3C S-2 -200 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a.6 Myriam de Timary -Jeannine Thys 42,25 %
19 NS 2K N = 90 17.5 79.55
20 NS 4P S+2 680 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a.5 Lydia Wildiers -Benoit Ortegat 51,76 %
21 NS 3S W+1 -430 10 45.45
22 NS 4P E+1 -650 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.4 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 49,68 %
23 NS 4C S-6 -600 0.1 0.45
24 NS 3C E = -140 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
a.3 Stan Tabor -Marie J. de Wagheneire 50,91 %
25 NS 2P S = 110 14 63.64
26 NS 2C W = -110 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.2 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 51,29 %
27 NS 3T S+1 130 14.3 65.00
28 NS 1S N-2 -200 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
Total : 266,2 / 484 = 55,00 %
PAIRE A.5 Pascale Ortegat -Serge Alard
a.8 Marie Claire Vienne -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 36,88 %
1 NS 4C S-1 -50 9.9 45.00
2 NS 3P W-1 50 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a.7 Francoise Nibelle -Gaetan van de Werve 56,80 %
3 NS 4P N = 420 16.5 75.00
4 NS 1S E+1 -120 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a.5 Lydia Wildiers -Benoit Ortegat 51,76 %
9 NS 3T N = 110 2.3 10.45
10 NS 3S W-2 200 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.4 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 49,68 %
11 NS 3S N+1 430 20.8 94.55
12 NS 4C E-1 50 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a.3 Stan Tabor -Marie J. de Wagheneire 50,91 %
13 NS 4C E-1 100 18.6 84.55
14 NS 2C S = 110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a.2 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 51,29 %
15 NS 3S E = -400 12.1 55.00
16 NS 2C E = -110 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 53,67 %
17 NS 4P E+1 -450 1.2 5.45
18 NS 3C S-2 -200 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
a14 - 0,00 %
19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a13 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 50,25 %
21 NS 3S W+1 -430 10 45.45
22 NS 4P E+2 -680 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a11 Anne Rose Van de Werve -Nathalie de Laminne 38,37 %
23 NS 5K N = 600 21.9 99.55
24 NS 2P N-1 -50 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 94,55 %
a10 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 47,88 %
25 NS 2P S-1 -50 5 22.73
26 NS 2C W+1 -140 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a.9 Patrick Gilles -Francoise Duren 60,72 %
27 NS 2PcW-1 100 8.8 40.00
28 NS 1S N-1 -100 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
Total : 264,0 / 484 = 54,55 %
PAIRE A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh
a12 Gerard Cooreman -Michel Lahaut 59,56 %
1 NS 4C S-1 -50 9.9 45.00
2 NS 2P W-1 50 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a11 Anne Rose Van de Werve -Nathalie de Laminne 38,37 %
3 NS 2P S+4 230 11 50.00
4 NS 2S E = -120 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a10 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 47,88 %
5 NS 3S N-2 -200 2.3 10.45
6 NS 2K E = -90 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a.9 Patrick Gilles -Francoise Duren 60,72 %
7 NS 2P N-2 -200 4.5 20.45
8 NS 3S W+1 -430 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
a.7 Francoise Nibelle -Gaetan van de Werve 56,80 %
13 NS 3P S-2 -200 3.4 15.45
14 NS 2C S+2 170 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a.6 Myriam de Timary -Jeannine Thys 42,25 %
15 NS 3S E-1 50 20.8 94.55
16 NS 2C E = -110 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a.5 Lydia Wildiers -Benoit Ortegat 51,76 %
17 NS 4C E = -420 11 50.00
18 NS 3T E = -110 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a.4 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 49,68 %
19 NS 2K N = 90 17.5 79.55
20 NS 4P S+1 650 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a.3 Stan Tabor -Marie J. de Wagheneire 50,91 %
21 NS 3S W = -400 20 90.91
22 NS 2P E+3 -200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 95,45 %
a.2 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 51,29 %
23 NS 4C S-1 -100 7.7 35.00
24 NS 4C E = -420 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
a.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 53,67 %
25 NS 3P S-1 -50 5 22.73
26 NS 3C W = -140 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a13 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 50,25 %
27 NS 3S N = 400 21.9 99.55
28 NS 1S N-1 -100 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
Total : 278,1 / 528 = 52,67 %
PAIRE A.3 Anne Tirtiaux -Christiane Vroninckx
a.3 Stan Tabor -Marie J. de Wagheneire 50,91 %
5 NS 2S S-1 -100 11 50.00
6 NS 2P W-1 100 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a.2 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 51,29 %
7 NS 2S N-3 -300 1.2 5.45
8 NS 3S E+1 -430 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 12,95 %
a.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 53,67 %
9 NS 3T N = 110 2.3 10.45
10 NS 3S E-1 100 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a14 - 0,00 %
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a13 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 50,25 %
13 NS 4P S-4 -400 0.1 0.45
14 NS 1S S+1 120 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a12 Gerard Cooreman -Michel Lahaut 59,56 %
15 NS 3S W+1 -430 5.5 25.00
16 NS 1P W = -80 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a11 Anne Rose Van de Werve -Nathalie de Laminne 38,37 %
17 NS 3S E = -400 16.5 75.00
18 NS 5T E-3 150 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 87,27 %
a.9 Patrick Gilles -Francoise Duren 60,72 %
19 NS 2K N-1 -50 7.7 35.00
20 NS 3S S+2 660 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 32,50 %
a.8 Marie Claire Vienne -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 36,88 %
21 NS 3S W+1 -430 10 45.45
22 NS 4P E+1 -650 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.7 Francoise Nibelle -Gaetan van de Werve 56,80 %
23 NS 3K N = 110 12.1 55.00
24 NS 4C E+1 -450 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a.6 Myriam de Timary -Jeannine Thys 42,25 %
25 NS 2P S = 110 14 63.64
26 NS 3C W+1 -170 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.5 Lydia Wildiers -Benoit Ortegat 51,76 %
27 NS 3P W-3 150 18.6 84.55
28 NS 1S N-1 -100 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
Total : 233,6 / 484 = 48,26 %
PAIRE A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten
a.7 Francoise Nibelle -Gaetan van de Werve 56,80 %
1 NS 4C S-2 -100 1.2 5.45
2 NS 2P W = -110 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
a.6 Myriam de Timary -Jeannine Thys 42,25 %
3 NS 4P N+1 450 21.9 99.55
4 NS 2S E = -120 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
a.5 Lydia Wildiers -Benoit Ortegat 51,76 %
5 NS 3S N-1 -100 11 50.00
6 NS 2K E = -90 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.3 Stan Tabor -Marie J. de Wagheneire 50,91 %
7 NS 2K S-1 -100 11 50.00
8 NS 3S W-2 100 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a.2 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 51,29 %
9 NS 3T N+1 130 6.6 30.00
10 NS 1S W+1 -120 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
a.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 53,67 %
11 NS 4C S-2 -100 0.1 0.45
12 NS 4C E-1 50 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
a14 - 0,00 %
13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a13 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 50,25 %
15 NS 3S W+1 -430 5.5 25.00
16 NS 1S E = -90 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a11 Anne Rose Van de Werve -Nathalie de Laminne 38,37 %
21 NS 3S W+1 -430 10 45.45
22 NS 4P E = -620 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a10 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 47,88 %
23 NS 3K N+1 130 16.5 75.00
24 NS 4C E = -420 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.9 Patrick Gilles -Francoise Duren 60,72 %
25 NS 2P S = 110 14 63.64
26 NS 3C W = -140 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.8 Marie Claire Vienne -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 36,88 %
27 NS 3T S-1 -50 4.5 20.45
28 NS 2C E = -110 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
Total : 229,1 / 484 = 47,33 %
PAIRE A13 Sylviane Delbeke -Fabienne Smit
a11 Anne Rose Van de Werve -Nathalie de Laminne 38,37 %
1 NS 3C S-1 -50 9.9 45.00
2 NS 2P W = -110 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
a10 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 47,88 %
3 NS 4P S = 420 16.5 75.00
4 NS 2S E = -120 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a.9 Patrick Gilles -Francoise Duren 60,72 %
5 NS 3S N-2 -200 2.3 10.45
6 NS 2P W = -110 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 15,45 %
a.8 Marie Claire Vienne -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 36,88 %
7 NS 2P N-1 -100 11 50.00
8 NS 3S E-1 50 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a.7 Francoise Nibelle -Gaetan van de Werve 56,80 %
9 NS 3C E-3 300 13.2 60.00
10 NS 2S W+1 -150 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
a.5 Lydia Wildiers -Benoit Ortegat 51,76 %
11 NS 4C S = 420 13.2 60.00
12 NS 4P E-1 50 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a.4 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 49,68 %
13 NS 3P N-1 -100 12.1 55.00
14 NS 2C S = 110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.3 Stan Tabor -Marie J. de Wagheneire 50,91 %
15 NS 3S E+1 -430 5.5 25.00
16 NS 1P W+2 -140 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
a.2 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 51,29 %
17 NS 3S E = -400 16.5 75.00
18 NS 3CcS-2 -500 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
a.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 53,67 %
19 NS 2K N+1 110 21.9 99.55
20 NS 3S S+2 660 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a13 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 50,25 %
25 NS 2P S+1 140 21 95.45
26 NS 3C W = -140 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a12 Gerard Cooreman -Michel Lahaut 59,56 %
27 NS 3T S-1 -50 4.5 20.45
28 NS 1S N-1 -100 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
Total : 248,1 / 528 = 46,99 %
PAIRE A.2 Colette Heerinckx -Jeannine Wanderpepen
a.2 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 51,29 %
3 NS 3P S+1 170 6.6 30.00
4 NS 2PcS-3 -800 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
a.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 53,67 %
5 NS 5T N-1 -100 11 50.00
6 NS 2P W = -110 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
a14 - 0,00 %
7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a13 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 50,25 %
9 NS 3C E-2 200 8.8 40.00
10 NS 3S W = -600 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
a12 Gerard Cooreman -Michel Lahaut 59,56 %
11 NS 4C S = 420 13.2 60.00
12 NS 4C E-1 50 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
a11 Anne Rose Van de Werve -Nathalie de Laminne 38,37 %
13 NS 3C E+1 -170 7.7 35.00
14 NS 2C S-1 -50 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
a10 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 47,88 %
15 NS 3S E+1 -430 5.5 25.00
16 NS 1S E+1 -120 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.8 Marie Claire Vienne -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 36,88 %
17 NS 3S E-1 50 19.7 89.55
18 NS 3T E = -110 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.7 Francoise Nibelle -Gaetan van de Werve 56,80 %
19 NS 3K N-1 -50 7.7 35.00
20 NS 4P S+2 680 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.6 Myriam de Timary -Jeannine Thys 42,25 %
21 NS 3S W = -400 20 90.91
22 NS 4P E+1 -650 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a.5 Lydia Wildiers -Benoit Ortegat 51,76 %
23 NS 4C S-1 -100 7.7 35.00
24 NS 3C E+1 -170 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
a.4 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 49,68 %
25 NS 2P S = 110 14 63.64
26 NS 4C W-2 200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
Total : 223,4 / 484 = 46,16 %
PAIRE A.9 Claire Derieuw -Diane Deslignes
a.3 Stan Tabor -Marie J. de Wagheneire 50,91 %
1 NS 4C S-2 -100 1.2 5.45
2 NS 2P W = -110 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
a.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 53,67 %
3 NS 4P S = 420 16.5 75.00
4 NS 2S E = -120 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a14 - 0,00 %
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a13 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 50,25 %
7 NS 2P N-1 -100 11 50.00
8 NS 3S W+1 -430 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
a12 Gerard Cooreman -Michel Lahaut 59,56 %
9 NS 4C E-3 300 13.2 60.00
10 NS 1S W+2 -150 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 40,23 %
a11 Anne Rose Van de Werve -Nathalie de Laminne 38,37 %
11 NS 4C N-1 -50 4.5 20.45
12 NS 4C E-2 100 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a.9 Patrick Gilles -Francoise Duren 60,72 %
17 NS 3S E+1 -430 5.5 25.00
18 NS 4T E = -130 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
a.8 Marie Claire Vienne -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 36,88 %
19 NS 3K N-1 -50 7.7 35.00
20 NS 3S S+4 720 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a.7 Francoise Nibelle -Gaetan van de Werve 56,80 %
21 NS 3S W+2 -460 1 4.55
22 NS 4CcS-4 -800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 2,27 %
a.6 Myriam de Timary -Jeannine Thys 42,25 %
23 NS 3K N+1 130 16.5 75.00
24 NS 2S E = -120 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.5 Lydia Wildiers -Benoit Ortegat 51,76 %
25 NS 3P S-1 -50 5 22.73
26 NS 2C W+1 -140 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a.4 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 49,68 %
27 NS 3T S-1 -50 4.5 20.45
28 NS 1S N-1 -100 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
Total : 208,7 / 484 = 43,12 %
PAIRE A.4 Virginie Van Damme -Brigitte Brusselmans
a.6 Myriam de Timary -Jeannine Thys 42,25 %
1 NS 2C S+1 140 18.6 84.55
2 NS 2P W = -110 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
a.4 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 49,68 %
7 NS 2P N-3 -300 1.2 5.45
8 NS 3S W+1 -430 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 12,95 %
a.3 Stan Tabor -Marie J. de Wagheneire 50,91 %
9 NS 5C E-4 400 19.7 89.55
10 NS 2S W = -120 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a.2 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 51,29 %
11 NS 3S N+1 430 20.8 94.55
12 NS 4C E-1 50 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
a.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 53,67 %
13 NS 3C E+1 -170 7.7 35.00
14 NS 2C N-3 -150 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
a14 - 0,00 %
15 NS BYE 0 0.00
16 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a13 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 50,25 %
17 NS 4P E = -420 11 50.00
18 NS 3C S-2 -200 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a12 Gerard Cooreman -Michel Lahaut 59,56 %
19 NS 2C N-1 -50 7.7 35.00
20 NS 4P S+1 650 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
a10 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 47,88 %
21 NS 3S W+1 -430 10 45.45
22 NS 4P E+2 -680 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a.9 Patrick Gilles -Francoise Duren 60,72 %
23 NS 5K N-2 -200 4.5 20.45
24 NS 4C E+1 -450 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 15,45 %
a.8 Marie Claire Vienne -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 36,88 %
25 NS 3P S = 140 21 95.45
26 NS 4C W-1 100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
a.7 Francoise Nibelle -Gaetan van de Werve 56,80 %
27 NS 5T S-3 -150 0.1 0.45
28 NS 1S N-1 -100 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
Total : 201,9 / 484 = 41,71 %
PAIRE A14 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne
a13 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant 50,25 %
1 NS 3C S = 140 18.6 84.55
2 NS 3CcN-1 -200 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
a12 Gerard Cooreman -Michel Lahaut 59,56 %
3 NS 2C E-1 100 2.3 10.45
4 NS 2S E+1 -150 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
a11 Anne Rose Van de Werve -Nathalie de Laminne 38,37 %
5 NS 3S N-2 -200 2.3 10.45
6 NS 3T W-1 100 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a10 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 47,88 %
7 NS 1S S+1 120 21.9 99.55
8 NS 3S W = -400 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.9 Patrick Gilles -Francoise Duren 60,72 %
9 NS 5T N = 400 19.7 89.55
10 NS 2S W+1 -150 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.8 Marie Claire Vienne -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 36,88 %
11 NS 4C S-1 -50 4.5 20.45
12 NS 3K W+1 -130 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 15,45 %
a.6 Myriam de Timary -Jeannine Thys 42,25 %
13 NS 1S S = 90 15.4 70.00
14 NS 2C S = 110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a.5 Lydia Wildiers -Benoit Ortegat 51,76 %
15 NS 3S E+3 -490 0.1 0.45
16 NS 1S E+2 -150 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 0,45 %
a.4 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 49,68 %
17 NS 4P E = -420 11 50.00
18 NS 4T E-2 100 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
a.3 Stan Tabor -Marie J. de Wagheneire 50,91 %
19 NS 1S S-2 -100 0.1 0.45
20 NS 4P S+2 680 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a.2 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 51,29 %
21 NS 3S W+1 -430 10 45.45
22 NS 4P E+1 -650 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a14 - 0,00 %
27 NS BYE 0 0.00
28 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 201,7 / 484 = 41,67 %
PAIRE A.6 Simone Munsterhjelm -Marguerite Verstraeten
a10 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere 47,88 %
1 NS 4C S-1 -50 9.9 45.00
2 NS 3P W-1 50 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
a.9 Patrick Gilles -Francoise Duren 60,72 %
3 NS 2P S+1 140 4.5 20.45
4 NS 2S E = -120 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
a.8 Marie Claire Vienne -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 36,88 %
5 NS 4T N+1 150 17.5 79.55
6 NS 2P W = -110 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.6 Myriam de Timary -Jeannine Thys 42,25 %
11 NS 4C S = 420 13.2 60.00
12 NS 3C E = -140 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
a.5 Lydia Wildiers -Benoit Ortegat 51,76 %
13 NS 2S S-1 -100 12.1 55.00
14 NS 2C S = 110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
a.4 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck 49,68 %
15 NS 2K W+3 -150 15.4 70.00
16 NS 2C E = -110 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.3 Stan Tabor -Marie J. de Wagheneire 50,91 %
17 NS 3S E+1 -430 5.5 25.00
18 NS 3CcS-2 -500 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 15,23 %
a.2 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed 51,29 %
19 NS 2K N = 90 17.5 79.55
20 NS 3S S+2 660 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 54,77 %
a.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart 53,67 %
21 NS 3S W+1 -430 10 45.45
22 NS 4P E+2 -680 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a14 - 0,00 %
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a12 Gerard Cooreman -Michel Lahaut 59,56 %
25 NS 3P S-2 -100 0 0.00
26 NS 2C W+2 -170 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 4,55 %
a11 Anne Rose Van de Werve -Nathalie de Laminne 38,37 %
27 NS 2T S+1 110 11 50.00
28 NS 1S N-1 -100 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
Total : 197,6 / 484 = 40,83 %
PAIRE a.9 Patrick Gilles -Francoise Duren
A12 Hugo Baetens -Christian Neve 66,43 %
1 EO 3C S-1 -50 12.1 55.00
2 EO 2P W-1 50 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A.6 Simone Munsterhjelm -Marguerite Verstraeten 40,83 %
3 EO 2P S+1 140 17.5 79.55
4 EO 2S E = -120 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A13 Sylviane Delbeke -Fabienne Smit 46,99 %
5 EO 3S N-2 -200 19.7 89.55
6 EO 2P W = -110 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 84,55 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 52,67 %
7 EO 2P N-2 -200 17.5 79.55
8 EO 3S W+1 -430 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
A14 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 41,67 %
9 EO 5T N = 400 2.3 10.45
10 EO 2S W+1 -150 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.1 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 57,58 %
13 EO 2S S-2 -200 18.6 84.55
14 EO 2C S-1 -50 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 84,55 %
A.9 Claire Derieuw -Diane Deslignes 43,12 %
17 EO 3S E+1 -430 16.5 75.00
18 EO 4T E = -130 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
A.3 Anne Tirtiaux -Christiane Vroninckx 48,26 %
19 EO 2K N-1 -50 14.3 65.00
20 EO 3S S+2 660 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 67,50 %
A10 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 57,71 %
21 EO 3S W = -400 2 9.09
22 EO 4P E+1 -650 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A.4 Virginie Van Damme -Brigitte Brusselmans 41,71 %
23 EO 5K N-2 -200 17.5 79.55
24 EO 4C E+1 -450 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 84,55 %
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 47,33 %
25 EO 2P S = 110 8 36.36
26 EO 3C W = -140 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.5 Pascale Ortegat -Serge Alard 54,55 %
27 EO 2PcW-1 100 13.2 60.00
28 EO 1S N-1 -100 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
Total : 320,6 / 528 = 60,72 %
PAIRE a12 Gerard Cooreman -Michel Lahaut
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 52,67 %
1 EO 4C S-1 -50 12.1 55.00
2 EO 2P W-1 50 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A14 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 41,67 %
3 EO 2C E-1 100 19.7 89.55
4 EO 2S E+1 -150 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 89,55 %
A.8 Christian Meert -Sophie Noach 55,00 %
5 EO 3S S-1 -100 11 50.00
6 EO 2P W+3 -200 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A.1 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 57,58 %
7 EO 1P N = 80 4.5 20.45
8 EO 3S W = -400 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A.9 Claire Derieuw -Diane Deslignes 43,12 %
9 EO 4C E-3 300 8.8 40.00
10 EO 1S W+2 -150 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
A.2 Colette Heerinckx -Jeannine Wanderpepen 46,16 %
11 EO 4C S = 420 8.8 40.00
12 EO 4C E-1 50 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A10 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 57,71 %
13 EO 2P W-1 100 3.4 15.45
14 EO 2C S = 110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A.3 Anne Tirtiaux -Christiane Vroninckx 48,26 %
15 EO 3S W+1 -430 16.5 75.00
16 EO 1P W = -80 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.4 Virginie Van Damme -Brigitte Brusselmans 41,71 %
19 EO 2C N-1 -50 14.3 65.00
20 EO 4P S+1 650 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
A12 Hugo Baetens -Christian Neve 66,43 %
23 EO 3K S = 110 9.9 45.00
24 EO 4C E+1 -450 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A.6 Simone Munsterhjelm -Marguerite Verstraeten 40,83 %
25 EO 3P S-2 -100 22 100.00
26 EO 2C W+2 -170 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 95,45 %
A13 Sylviane Delbeke -Fabienne Smit 46,99 %
27 EO 3T S-1 -50 17.5 79.55
28 EO 1S N-1 -100 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
Total : 314,5 / 528 = 59,56 %
PAIRE a.7 Francoise Nibelle -Gaetan van de Werve
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 47,33 %
1 EO 4C S-2 -100 20.8 94.55
2 EO 2P W = -110 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
A.5 Pascale Ortegat -Serge Alard 54,55 %
3 EO 4P N = 420 5.5 25.00
4 EO 1S E+1 -120 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A12 Hugo Baetens -Christian Neve 66,43 %
5 EO 3S N-1 -100 11 50.00
6 EO 2K E-1 100 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A13 Sylviane Delbeke -Fabienne Smit 46,99 %
9 EO 3C E-3 300 8.8 40.00
10 EO 2S W+1 -150 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 52,67 %
13 EO 3P S-2 -200 18.6 84.55
14 EO 2C S+2 170 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A.1 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 57,58 %
15 EO 3S E-1 50 1.2 5.45
16 EO 1S E = -90 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
A.8 Christian Meert -Sophie Noach 55,00 %
17 EO 6C W-4 200 0.1 0.45
18 EO 3C S-2 -200 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A.2 Colette Heerinckx -Jeannine Wanderpepen 46,16 %
19 EO 3K N-1 -50 14.3 65.00
20 EO 4P S+2 680 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.9 Claire Derieuw -Diane Deslignes 43,12 %
21 EO 3S W+2 -460 21 95.45
22 EO 4CcS-4 -800 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 97,73 %
A.3 Anne Tirtiaux -Christiane Vroninckx 48,26 %
23 EO 3K N = 110 9.9 45.00
24 EO 4C E+1 -450 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A10 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 57,71 %
25 EO 4P S-1 -50 17 77.27
26 EO 3C W+1 -170 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
A.4 Virginie Van Damme -Brigitte Brusselmans 41,71 %
27 EO 5T S-3 -150 21.9 99.55
28 EO 1S N-1 -100 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
Total : 299,9 / 528 = 56,80 %
PAIRE a.1 Annie Zeimes -Thierry Collart
A.1 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 57,58 %
1 EO 5TcE-4 800 0.1 0.45
2 EO 3C N-1 -100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 20,23 %
A.9 Claire Derieuw -Diane Deslignes 43,12 %
3 EO 4P S = 420 5.5 25.00
4 EO 2S E = -120 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A.2 Colette Heerinckx -Jeannine Wanderpepen 46,16 %
5 EO 5T N-1 -100 11 50.00
6 EO 2P W = -110 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A10 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 57,71 %
7 EO 2K S = 90 2.3 10.45
8 EO 3S W+1 -430 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.3 Anne Tirtiaux -Christiane Vroninckx 48,26 %
9 EO 3T N = 110 19.7 89.55
10 EO 3S E-1 100 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 47,33 %
11 EO 4C S-2 -100 21.9 99.55
12 EO 4C E-1 50 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A.4 Virginie Van Damme -Brigitte Brusselmans 41,71 %
13 EO 3C E+1 -170 14.3 65.00
14 EO 2C N-3 -150 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
A12 Hugo Baetens -Christian Neve 66,43 %
15 EO 2T E+1 -110 4.5 20.45
16 EO 2S W-2 200 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 12,95 %
A.5 Pascale Ortegat -Serge Alard 54,55 %
17 EO 4P E+1 -450 20.8 94.55
18 EO 3C S-2 -200 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
A13 Sylviane Delbeke -Fabienne Smit 46,99 %
19 EO 2K N+1 110 0.1 0.45
20 EO 3S S+2 660 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A.6 Simone Munsterhjelm -Marguerite Verstraeten 40,83 %
21 EO 3S W+1 -430 12 54.55
22 EO 4P E+2 -680 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 52,67 %
25 EO 3P S-1 -50 17 77.27
26 EO 3C W = -140 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
Total : 283,4 / 528 = 53,67 %
PAIRE a.5 Lydia Wildiers -Benoit Ortegat
A10 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 57,71 %
1 EO 4C S-1 -50 12.1 55.00
2 EO 2P W = -110 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 47,33 %
5 EO 3S N-1 -100 11 50.00
6 EO 2K E = -90 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.5 Pascale Ortegat -Serge Alard 54,55 %
9 EO 3T N = 110 19.7 89.55
10 EO 3S W-2 200 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A13 Sylviane Delbeke -Fabienne Smit 46,99 %
11 EO 4C S = 420 8.8 40.00
12 EO 4P E-1 50 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A.6 Simone Munsterhjelm -Marguerite Verstraeten 40,83 %
13 EO 2S S-1 -100 9.9 45.00
14 EO 2C S = 110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A14 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 41,67 %
15 EO 3S E+3 -490 21.9 99.55
16 EO 1S E+2 -150 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 99,55 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 52,67 %
17 EO 4C E = -420 11 50.00
18 EO 3T E = -110 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A.1 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 57,58 %
19 EO 3K N-1 -50 14.3 65.00
20 EO 3S S+3 690 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A.8 Christian Meert -Sophie Noach 55,00 %
21 EO 3S W+1 -430 12 54.55
22 EO 4P E+1 -650 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.2 Colette Heerinckx -Jeannine Wanderpepen 46,16 %
23 EO 4C S-1 -100 14.3 65.00
24 EO 3C E+1 -170 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A.9 Claire Derieuw -Diane Deslignes 43,12 %
25 EO 3P S-1 -50 17 77.27
26 EO 2C W+1 -140 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A.3 Anne Tirtiaux -Christiane Vroninckx 48,26 %
27 EO 3P W-3 150 3.4 15.45
28 EO 1S N-1 -100 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
Total : 273,3 / 528 = 51,76 %
PAIRE a.2 Jean de Villenfagne -Mercedes Steed
A.2 Colette Heerinckx -Jeannine Wanderpepen 46,16 %
3 EO 3P S+1 170 15.4 70.00
4 EO 2PcS-3 -800 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
A10 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 57,71 %
5 EO 4PcE-3 500 2.3 10.45
6 EO 2S E-1 100 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 15,45 %
A.3 Anne Tirtiaux -Christiane Vroninckx 48,26 %
7 EO 2S N-3 -300 20.8 94.55
8 EO 3S E+1 -430 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 87,05 %
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 47,33 %
9 EO 3T N+1 130 15.4 70.00
10 EO 1S W+1 -120 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
A.4 Virginie Van Damme -Brigitte Brusselmans 41,71 %
11 EO 3S N+1 430 1.2 5.45
12 EO 4C E-1 50 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A12 Hugo Baetens -Christian Neve 66,43 %
13 EO 2P W-2 200 0.1 0.45
14 EO 1C S+2 140 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 5,45 %
A.5 Pascale Ortegat -Serge Alard 54,55 %
15 EO 3S E = -400 9.9 45.00
16 EO 2C E = -110 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A13 Sylviane Delbeke -Fabienne Smit 46,99 %
17 EO 3S E = -400 5.5 25.00
18 EO 3CcS-2 -500 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 59,77 %
A.6 Simone Munsterhjelm -Marguerite Verstraeten 40,83 %
19 EO 2K N = 90 4.5 20.45
20 EO 3S S+2 660 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 45,23 %
A14 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 41,67 %
21 EO 3S W+1 -430 12 54.55
22 EO 4P E+1 -650 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 52,67 %
23 EO 4C S-1 -100 14.3 65.00
24 EO 4C E = -420 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
A.8 Christian Meert -Sophie Noach 55,00 %
27 EO 3T S+1 130 7.7 35.00
28 EO 1S N-2 -200 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
Total : 270,8 / 528 = 51,29 %
PAIRE a.3 Stan Tabor -Marie J. de Wagheneire
A.9 Claire Derieuw -Diane Deslignes 43,12 %
1 EO 4C S-2 -100 20.8 94.55
2 EO 2P W = -110 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
A.3 Anne Tirtiaux -Christiane Vroninckx 48,26 %
5 EO 2S S-1 -100 11 50.00
6 EO 2P W-1 100 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 47,33 %
7 EO 2K S-1 -100 11 50.00
8 EO 3S W-2 100 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A.4 Virginie Van Damme -Brigitte Brusselmans 41,71 %
9 EO 5C E-4 400 2.3 10.45
10 EO 2S W = -120 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A12 Hugo Baetens -Christian Neve 66,43 %
11 EO 4C S-1 -50 17.5 79.55
12 EO 4C E-1 50 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 62,27 %
A.5 Pascale Ortegat -Serge Alard 54,55 %
13 EO 4C E-1 100 3.4 15.45
14 EO 2C S = 110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A13 Sylviane Delbeke -Fabienne Smit 46,99 %
15 EO 3S E+1 -430 16.5 75.00
16 EO 1P W+2 -140 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 82,27 %
A.6 Simone Munsterhjelm -Marguerite Verstraeten 40,83 %
17 EO 3S E+1 -430 16.5 75.00
18 EO 3CcS-2 -500 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 84,77 %
A14 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 41,67 %
19 EO 1S S-2 -100 21.9 99.55
20 EO 4P S+2 680 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 67,27 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 52,67 %
21 EO 3S W = -400 2 9.09
22 EO 2P E+3 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 4,55 %
A.1 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 57,58 %
23 EO 5C S-4 -400 19.7 89.55
24 EO 2S E+3 -210 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A.8 Christian Meert -Sophie Noach 55,00 %
25 EO 2P S = 110 8 36.36
26 EO 2C W = -110 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
Total : 268,8 / 528 = 50,91 %
PAIRE a13 Pascale Graton -Nadine Brabant
A14 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 41,67 %
1 EO 3C S = 140 3.4 15.45
2 EO 3CcN-1 -200 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A.8 Christian Meert -Sophie Noach 55,00 %
3 EO 4P S-1 -50 21.9 99.55
4 EO 2S E-1 100 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A.1 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 57,58 %
5 EO 3S S+1 630 0.1 0.45
6 EO 2S E-1 100 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 10,45 %
A.9 Claire Derieuw -Diane Deslignes 43,12 %
7 EO 2P N-1 -100 11 50.00
8 EO 3S W+1 -430 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A.2 Colette Heerinckx -Jeannine Wanderpepen 46,16 %
9 EO 3C E-2 200 13.2 60.00
10 EO 3S W = -600 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 79,77 %
A10 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 57,71 %
11 EO 4C S = 420 8.8 40.00
12 EO 4C E-1 50 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A.3 Anne Tirtiaux -Christiane Vroninckx 48,26 %
13 EO 4P S-4 -400 21.9 99.55
14 EO 1S S+1 120 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 47,33 %
15 EO 3S W+1 -430 16.5 75.00
16 EO 1S E = -90 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.4 Virginie Van Damme -Brigitte Brusselmans 41,71 %
17 EO 4P E = -420 11 50.00
18 EO 3C S-2 -200 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A.5 Pascale Ortegat -Serge Alard 54,55 %
21 EO 3S W+1 -430 12 54.55
22 EO 4P E+2 -680 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A13 Sylviane Delbeke -Fabienne Smit 46,99 %
25 EO 2P S+1 140 1 4.55
26 EO 3C W = -140 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 52,67 %
27 EO 3S N = 400 0.1 0.45
28 EO 1S N-1 -100 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 17,73 %
Total : 265,3 / 528 = 50,25 %
PAIRE a.4 Chantal Deruyck -Christian Deruyck
A10 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 57,71 %
3 EO 3CcE-1 200 13.2 60.00
4 EO 2S E-1 100 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 37,73 %
A.4 Virginie Van Damme -Brigitte Brusselmans 41,71 %
7 EO 2P N-3 -300 20.8 94.55
8 EO 3S W+1 -430 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 87,05 %
A12 Hugo Baetens -Christian Neve 66,43 %
9 EO 3T N = 110 19.7 89.55
10 EO 1S W-1 100 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.5 Pascale Ortegat -Serge Alard 54,55 %
11 EO 3S N+1 430 1.2 5.45
12 EO 4C E-1 50 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A13 Sylviane Delbeke -Fabienne Smit 46,99 %
13 EO 3P N-1 -100 9.9 45.00
14 EO 2C S = 110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
A.6 Simone Munsterhjelm -Marguerite Verstraeten 40,83 %
15 EO 2K W+3 -150 6.6 30.00
16 EO 2C E = -110 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A14 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 41,67 %
17 EO 4P E = -420 11 50.00
18 EO 4T E-2 100 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 52,67 %
19 EO 2K N = 90 4.5 20.45
20 EO 4P S+1 650 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 57,50 %
A.1 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 57,58 %
21 EO 3S W+2 -460 21 95.45
22 EO 4P E+1 -650 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A.8 Christian Meert -Sophie Noach 55,00 %
23 EO 4C S-6 -600 21.9 99.55
24 EO 3C E = -140 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
A.2 Colette Heerinckx -Jeannine Wanderpepen 46,16 %
25 EO 2P S = 110 8 36.36
26 EO 4C W-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
A.9 Claire Derieuw -Diane Deslignes 43,12 %
27 EO 3T S-1 -50 17.5 79.55
28 EO 1S N-1 -100 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
Total : 262,3 / 528 = 49,68 %
PAIRE a10 Francoise Turin -Nicole Leclere
A.6 Simone Munsterhjelm -Marguerite Verstraeten 40,83 %
1 EO 4C S-1 -50 12.1 55.00
2 EO 3P W-1 50 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A13 Sylviane Delbeke -Fabienne Smit 46,99 %
3 EO 4P S = 420 5.5 25.00
4 EO 2S E = -120 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 52,67 %
5 EO 3S N-2 -200 19.7 89.55
6 EO 2K E = -90 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 72,27 %
A14 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 41,67 %
7 EO 1S S+1 120 0.1 0.45
8 EO 3S W = -400 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.8 Christian Meert -Sophie Noach 55,00 %
9 EO 3P W-3 300 8.8 40.00
10 EO 3S W-1 100 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 30,23 %
A.1 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 57,58 %
11 EO 4C N = 420 8.8 40.00
12 EO 4C E-1 50 9.9 45.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
A.2 Colette Heerinckx -Jeannine Wanderpepen 46,16 %
15 EO 3S E+1 -430 16.5 75.00
16 EO 1S E+1 -120 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A10 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 57,71 %
19 EO 3K N-1 -50 14.3 65.00
20 EO 4P S+2 680 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.4 Virginie Van Damme -Brigitte Brusselmans 41,71 %
21 EO 3S W+1 -430 12 54.55
22 EO 4P E+2 -680 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 47,33 %
23 EO 3K N+1 130 5.5 25.00
24 EO 4C E = -420 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.5 Pascale Ortegat -Serge Alard 54,55 %
25 EO 2P S-1 -50 17 77.27
26 EO 2C W+1 -140 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A12 Hugo Baetens -Christian Neve 66,43 %
27 EO 2T S+3 150 3.4 15.45
28 EO 1S N-1 -100 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
Total : 252,8 / 528 = 47,88 %
PAIRE a.6 Myriam de Timary -Jeannine Thys
A.4 Virginie Van Damme -Brigitte Brusselmans 41,71 %
1 EO 2C S+1 140 3.4 15.45
2 EO 2P W = -110 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 47,33 %
3 EO 4P N+1 450 0.1 0.45
4 EO 2S E = -120 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A12 Hugo Baetens -Christian Neve 66,43 %
7 EO 2K S-1 -100 11 50.00
8 EO 3S W-1 50 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A.6 Simone Munsterhjelm -Marguerite Verstraeten 40,83 %
11 EO 4C S = 420 8.8 40.00
12 EO 3C E = -140 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 69,77 %
A14 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 41,67 %
13 EO 1S S = 90 6.6 30.00
14 EO 2C S = 110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 52,67 %
15 EO 3S E-1 50 1.2 5.45
16 EO 2C E = -110 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A.1 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 57,58 %
17 EO 4P E+1 -450 20.8 94.55
18 EO 3S W-2 100 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.8 Christian Meert -Sophie Noach 55,00 %
19 EO 2K N = 90 4.5 20.45
20 EO 4P S+2 680 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 27,73 %
A.2 Colette Heerinckx -Jeannine Wanderpepen 46,16 %
21 EO 3S W = -400 2 9.09
22 EO 4P E+1 -650 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A.9 Claire Derieuw -Diane Deslignes 43,12 %
23 EO 3K N+1 130 5.5 25.00
24 EO 2S E = -120 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.3 Anne Tirtiaux -Christiane Vroninckx 48,26 %
25 EO 2P S = 110 8 36.36
26 EO 3C W+1 -170 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A10 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 57,71 %
27 EO 2T S+2 130 7.7 35.00
28 EO 1S N-2 -200 20.8 94.55 µ Tbl = 64,77 %
Total : 223,1 / 528 = 42,25 %
PAIRE a11 Anne Rose Van de Werve -Nathalie de Laminne
A13 Sylviane Delbeke -Fabienne Smit 46,99 %
1 EO 3C S-1 -50 12.1 55.00
2 EO 2P W = -110 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 52,67 %
3 EO 2P S+4 230 11 50.00
4 EO 2S E = -120 12.1 55.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
A14 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 41,67 %
5 EO 3S N-2 -200 19.7 89.55
6 EO 3T W-1 100 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.8 Christian Meert -Sophie Noach 55,00 %
7 EO 2K S-1 -100 11 50.00
8 EO 3S W-1 50 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A.1 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 57,58 %
9 EO 3S S = 400 2.3 10.45
10 EO 2P N-1 -100 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A.9 Claire Derieuw -Diane Deslignes 43,12 %
11 EO 4C N-1 -50 17.5 79.55
12 EO 4C E-2 100 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A.2 Colette Heerinckx -Jeannine Wanderpepen 46,16 %
13 EO 3C E+1 -170 14.3 65.00
14 EO 2C S-1 -50 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 74,77 %
A.3 Anne Tirtiaux -Christiane Vroninckx 48,26 %
17 EO 3S E = -400 5.5 25.00
18 EO 5T E-3 150 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 12,73 %
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 47,33 %
21 EO 3S W+1 -430 12 54.55
22 EO 4P E = -620 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.5 Pascale Ortegat -Serge Alard 54,55 %
23 EO 5K N = 600 0.1 0.45
24 EO 2P N-1 -50 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 5,45 %
A12 Hugo Baetens -Christian Neve 66,43 %
25 EO 2P S = 110 8 36.36
26 EO 2S N = 120 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.6 Simone Munsterhjelm -Marguerite Verstraeten 40,83 %
27 EO 2T S+1 110 11 50.00
28 EO 1S N-1 -100 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 42,50 %
Total : 202,6 / 528 = 38,37 %
PAIRE a.8 Marie Claire Vienne -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
A.5 Pascale Ortegat -Serge Alard 54,55 %
1 EO 4C S-1 -50 12.1 55.00
2 EO 3P W-1 50 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A12 Hugo Baetens -Christian Neve 66,43 %
3 EO 4P N = 420 5.5 25.00
4 EO 2S E-2 200 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 12,73 %
A.6 Simone Munsterhjelm -Marguerite Verstraeten 40,83 %
5 EO 4T N+1 150 4.5 20.45
6 EO 2P W = -110 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A13 Sylviane Delbeke -Fabienne Smit 46,99 %
7 EO 2P N-1 -100 11 50.00
8 EO 3S E-1 50 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 35,23 %
A14 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 41,67 %
11 EO 4C S-1 -50 17.5 79.55
12 EO 3K W+1 -130 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 84,55 %
A.8 Christian Meert -Sophie Noach 55,00 %
15 EO 3S E = -400 9.9 45.00
16 EO 2C E-2 200 1.2 5.45 µ Tbl = 25,23 %
A.2 Colette Heerinckx -Jeannine Wanderpepen 46,16 %
17 EO 3S E-1 50 2.3 10.45
18 EO 3T E = -110 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.9 Claire Derieuw -Diane Deslignes 43,12 %
19 EO 3K N-1 -50 14.3 65.00
20 EO 3S S+4 720 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 32,73 %
A.3 Anne Tirtiaux -Christiane Vroninckx 48,26 %
21 EO 3S W+1 -430 12 54.55
22 EO 4P E+1 -650 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A10 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 57,71 %
23 EO 3K N+2 150 2.3 10.45
24 EO 4C E-1 50 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 5,45 %
A.4 Virginie Van Damme -Brigitte Brusselmans 41,71 %
25 EO 3P S = 140 1 4.55
26 EO 4C W-1 100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 47,33 %
27 EO 3T S-1 -50 17.5 79.55
28 EO 2C E = -110 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
Total : 194,7 / 528 = 36,88 %
PAIRE a14 -
A.8 Christian Meert -Sophie Noach 55,00 %
1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.1 Patricia Bardy -Chris Oostens 57,58 %
3 EO BYE 0 0.00
4 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.9 Claire Derieuw -Diane Deslignes 43,12 %
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.2 Colette Heerinckx -Jeannine Wanderpepen 46,16 %
7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A10 Michele Berrier -Christine Defraigne 57,71 %
9 EO BYE 0 0.00
10 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.3 Anne Tirtiaux -Christiane Vroninckx 48,26 %
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A11 Grazia Neuenschwander -Lydia Luyten 47,33 %
13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.4 Virginie Van Damme -Brigitte Brusselmans 41,71 %
15 EO BYE 0 0.00
16 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A12 Hugo Baetens -Christian Neve 66,43 %
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.5 Pascale Ortegat -Serge Alard 54,55 %
19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.6 Simone Munsterhjelm -Marguerite Verstraeten 40,83 %
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A14 Michou van Wetter -Regine de Hemptinne 41,67 %
27 EO BYE 0 0.00
28 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 616 = 0,00 %
|