B.C.O.B. 
 Voir Feuilles de marque Voir Diagramme des donnes
Classement Nord-Sud
--- 1 67,69 A.5 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige
--- 2 61,34 A.9 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles
--- 3 56,99 A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh
--- 4 54,66 A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Giuseppe Napoli
--- 5 52,03 A10 Simone Munsterhjelm -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
--- 6 50,72 A.4 Patricia Bardy -Michele Berrier
--- 7 48,18 A.3 Francoise Turin -Sylviane Delbeke
--- 8 47,16 A.8 Colette Heerinckx -Chantal de Lichtervelde
--- 9 44,96 A13 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont
--- 10 43,83 A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Grazia Neuenschwander
--- 11 43,09 A11 Efthalia Bogaerts -Claire Rolin
--- 12 41,14 A12 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere
--- 13 39,11 A.6 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy
Classement Est-Ouest
--- 1 55,87 a.9 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire
--- 2 55,27 a10 Didier Collart -Christian Meert
--- 3 53,43 a.7 Alexandre Viot -Pascale Ortegat
--- 4 52,88 a.8 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot
--- 5 52,01 a.6 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve
--- 6 49,98 a.2 Michel Lievens -Jacques Podevyn
--- 7 49,55 a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger
--- 8 48,60 a12 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Wanderpepen
--- 9 48,50 a.5 Helene Schyns -Dominique Sassen
--- 10 46,72 a.4 Serge Alard -Myriam de Timary
--- 11 46,61 a13 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten
--- 12 46,57 a11 Diane della Faille -Elie Behaghel
--- 13 43,96 a.1 Danielle Wybauw -Jeannine Thys
PAIRE A.5 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige
a.9 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 55,87 %
1 NS 3S S+2 460 17 77.27
2 NS 3S E+2 -460 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a.8 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 52,88 %
3 NS 2P W = -110 13 59.09
4 NS 3C N = 140 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a.7 Alexandre Viot -Pascale Ortegat 53,43 %
5 NS 3C E+1 -170 12 54.55
6 NS 4P N+1 450 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.5 Helene Schyns -Dominique Sassen 48,50 %
9 NS 1S S+3 180 17 77.27
10 NS 3S S+1 630 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a.4 Serge Alard -Myriam de Timary 46,72 %
11 NS 2C S+1 140 16 72.73
12 NS 3S S+1 630 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 49,55 %
13 NS 1S E+2 -150 21 95.45
14 NS 4P S = 420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a.2 Michel Lievens -Jacques Podevyn 49,98 %
15 NS 5CcW-3 500 22 100.00
16 NS 6P N-1 -50 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a.1 Danielle Wybauw -Jeannine Thys 43,96 %
17 NS 3P S-2 -100 15 68.18
18 NS 3S S = 600 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a13 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 46,61 %
19 NS 2P W-1 100 21 95.45
20 NS 3S N+1 630 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 82,73 %
a12 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Wanderpepen 48,60 %
21 NS 4C W-1 50 7 31.82
22 NS 4PcW-1 200 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a11 Diane della Faille -Elie Behaghel 46,57 %
23 NS 2T E-1 100 22 100.00
24 NS 3S S = 400 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 97,73 %
a10 Didier Collart -Christian Meert 55,27 %
25 NS 2P W+3 -200 11 50.00
26 NS 2P W = -110 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
Total : 357,4 / 528 = 67,69 %
PAIRE A.9 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles
a.4 Serge Alard -Myriam de Timary 46,72 %
1 NS 3S S+3 490 22 100.00
2 NS 3S E+2 -460 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 49,55 %
3 NS 3C S+1 170 20 90.91
4 NS 4C S-1 -100 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a.2 Michel Lievens -Jacques Podevyn 49,98 %
5 NS 2C E+1 -140 18 81.82
6 NS 2P N+3 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.1 Danielle Wybauw -Jeannine Thys 43,96 %
7 NS 4C W+1 -650 10 45.45
8 NS 4C N = 420 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a13 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 46,61 %
9 NS 3P W-2 200 21 95.45
10 NS 3S S+1 630 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
a12 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Wanderpepen 48,60 %
11 NS 2C S+2 170 21 95.45
12 NS 3S N+1 630 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
a11 Diane della Faille -Elie Behaghel 46,57 %
13 NS 2P W+2 -170 17 77.27
14 NS 4P S = 420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a.9 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 55,87 %
17 NS 3P S-1 -50 20 90.91
18 NS 2P N+1 140 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a.8 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 52,88 %
19 NS 2S E = -120 11 50.00
20 NS 3S N+1 630 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a.7 Alexandre Viot -Pascale Ortegat 53,43 %
21 NS 4CcW-1 100 16 72.73
22 NS 4PcW-1 200 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a.6 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 52,01 %
23 NS 1S N-3 -300 2 9.09
24 NS 2S S+1 150 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.5 Helene Schyns -Dominique Sassen 48,50 %
25 NS 4P W = -620 4.5 20.45
26 NS 1S N = 90 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 39,77 %
Total : 323,9 / 528 = 61,34 %
PAIRE A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh
a13 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 46,61 %
1 NS 4P S+2 480 20 90.91
2 NS 3S E+3 -490 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a12 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Wanderpepen 48,60 %
3 NS 3P W+1 -170 3 13.64
4 NS 3C N = 140 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a11 Diane della Faille -Elie Behaghel 46,57 %
5 NS 3S W+1 -430 2 9.09
6 NS 4P N+2 480 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a10 Didier Collart -Christian Meert 55,27 %
7 NS 4C W+1 -650 10 45.45
8 NS 4C N-1 -50 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a.9 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 55,87 %
9 NS 3T S+1 130 7 31.82
10 NS 3S S = 600 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.7 Alexandre Viot -Pascale Ortegat 53,43 %
13 NS 1S E+3 -180 8 36.36
14 NS 3S N+1 430 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a.6 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 52,01 %
15 NS 5C W-2 100 17 77.27
16 NS 4P N+2 480 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
a.5 Helene Schyns -Dominique Sassen 48,50 %
17 NS 3K E = -110 9 40.91
18 NS 3S S+2 660 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a.4 Serge Alard -Myriam de Timary 46,72 %
19 NS 1S E+2 -150 2 9.09
20 NS 3S N = 600 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 17,05 %
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 49,55 %
21 NS 3S E-6 300 20 90.91
22 NS 4PcW-1 200 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
a.2 Michel Lievens -Jacques Podevyn 49,98 %
23 NS 1S N-1 -100 17 77.27
24 NS 3S S = 400 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
a.1 Danielle Wybauw -Jeannine Thys 43,96 %
25 NS 3P W+1 -170 15.4 70.00
26 NS 1S S = 90 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 64,55 %
Total : 300,9 / 528 = 56,99 %
PAIRE A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Giuseppe Napoli
a.2 Michel Lievens -Jacques Podevyn 49,98 %
3 NS 2P W+2 -170 3 13.64
4 NS 4C N-3 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 6,82 %
a.1 Danielle Wybauw -Jeannine Thys 43,96 %
5 NS 2C E+1 -140 18 81.82
6 NS 4P N+2 480 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
a13 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 46,61 %
7 NS 3S E+1 -630 20 90.91
8 NS 3S N-1 -50 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a12 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Wanderpepen 48,60 %
9 NS 3K N+2 150 14 63.64
10 NS 3S S = 600 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a11 Diane della Faille -Elie Behaghel 46,57 %
11 NS 2P W = -110 2 9.09
12 NS 3K W = -110 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
a10 Didier Collart -Christian Meert 55,27 %
13 NS 2C E+2 -170 17 77.27
14 NS 4P S = 420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a.9 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 55,87 %
15 NS 5C W-2 100 17 77.27
16 NS 4P N+1 450 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a.8 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 52,88 %
17 NS 3P S-2 -100 15 68.18
18 NS 2P N+2 170 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.7 Alexandre Viot -Pascale Ortegat 53,43 %
19 NS 2T W = -90 18 81.82
20 NS 3S N+1 630 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 75,91 %
a.6 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 52,01 %
21 NS 3C W-1 50 7 31.82
22 NS 4C S-1 -50 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a.5 Helene Schyns -Dominique Sassen 48,50 %
23 NS 1S N-1 -100 17 77.27
24 NS 2S S+2 180 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a.4 Serge Alard -Myriam de Timary 46,72 %
25 NS 60%60% Ajust 13.2 60.00
26 NS 1S S+1 120 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 68,64 %
Total : 288,6 / 528 = 54,66 %
PAIRE A10 Simone Munsterhjelm -Antoinette van Hoobrouck
a.6 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 52,01 %
1 NS 3S N+1 430 8 36.36
2 NS 4P E = -420 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.5 Helene Schyns -Dominique Sassen 48,50 %
3 NS 2P W+1 -140 9 40.91
4 NS 3C N-1 -100 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.4 Serge Alard -Myriam de Timary 46,72 %
5 NS 2C E+1 -140 18 81.82
6 NS 4P N+1 450 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 49,55 %
7 NS 3S W+1 -630 20 90.91
8 NS 4C N+1 450 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 93,18 %
a.2 Michel Lievens -Jacques Podevyn 49,98 %
9 NS 2P W-2 200 21 95.45
10 NS 3S S+1 630 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
a.1 Danielle Wybauw -Jeannine Thys 43,96 %
11 NS 2C S+1 140 16 72.73
12 NS 4PcW-3 500 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a13 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 46,61 %
13 NS 1S E+2 -150 21 95.45
14 NS 4P S = 420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a12 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Wanderpepen 48,60 %
15 NS 4C W-1 50 8 36.36
16 NS 4P N = 420 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a10 Didier Collart -Christian Meert 55,27 %
19 NS 2P E+1 -140 5 22.73
20 NS 60%40% Ajust 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 41,36 %
a.9 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 55,87 %
21 NS 3C W = -140 0 0.00
22 NS 4P W = -620 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
a.8 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 52,88 %
23 NS 1S N-2 -200 7 31.82
24 NS 2S S+1 150 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
a.7 Alexandre Viot -Pascale Ortegat 53,43 %
25 NS 4P W = -620 4.5 20.45
26 NS 1S S-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 10,23 %
Total : 274,7 / 528 = 52,03 %
PAIRE A.4 Patricia Bardy -Michele Berrier
a.7 Alexandre Viot -Pascale Ortegat 53,43 %
1 NS 3S S+2 460 17 77.27
2 NS 3S E+2 -460 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a.6 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 52,01 %
3 NS 2P W+2 -170 3 13.64
4 NS 2S N-1 -100 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.4 Serge Alard -Myriam de Timary 46,72 %
7 NS 4C E+2 -680 1 4.55
8 NS 4C N = 420 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 49,55 %
9 NS 2P W-1 100 0 0.00
10 NS 3S S = 600 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
a.2 Michel Lievens -Jacques Podevyn 49,98 %
11 NS 2C S+2 170 21 95.45
12 NS 3S N-2 -200 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.1 Danielle Wybauw -Jeannine Thys 43,96 %
13 NS 1S E+3 -180 8 36.36
14 NS 4P S = 420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a13 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 46,61 %
15 NS 4C W-1 50 8 36.36
16 NS 6P N-1 -50 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a12 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Wanderpepen 48,60 %
17 NS 3P S-2 -100 15 68.18
18 NS 4P N = 620 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a11 Diane della Faille -Elie Behaghel 46,57 %
19 NS 2T W-1 100 21 95.45
20 NS 3S N+1 630 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 82,73 %
a10 Didier Collart -Christian Meert 55,27 %
21 NS 5T E-2 100 16 72.73
22 NS 4PcW-1 200 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a.9 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 55,87 %
23 NS 1S N-3 -300 2 9.09
24 NS 2S S+1 150 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.8 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 52,88 %
25 NS 3P W+1 -170 15.4 70.00
26 NS 1S W-2 200 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 82,73 %
Total : 267,8 / 528 = 50,72 %
PAIRE A.3 Francoise Turin -Sylviane Delbeke
a.5 Helene Schyns -Dominique Sassen 48,50 %
1 NS 3S S = 400 2 9.09
2 NS 3S E+2 -460 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 49,55 %
5 NS 3S W = -400 7 31.82
6 NS 4P N+1 450 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.2 Michel Lievens -Jacques Podevyn 49,98 %
7 NS 3S W+1 -630 20 90.91
8 NS 4C N = 420 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a.1 Danielle Wybauw -Jeannine Thys 43,96 %
9 NS 3K N+1 130 7 31.82
10 NS 3S S+1 630 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a13 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 46,61 %
11 NS 1P W+1 -110 2 9.09
12 NS 3S N+1 630 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a12 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Wanderpepen 48,60 %
13 NS 1S E+3 -180 8 36.36
14 NS 3S N = 400 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a11 Diane della Faille -Elie Behaghel 46,57 %
15 NS 5C W-2 100 17 77.27
16 NS 4P N+1 450 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a10 Didier Collart -Christian Meert 55,27 %
17 NS 3P S-2 -100 15 68.18
18 NS 2P N+1 140 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.9 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 55,87 %
19 NS 1S E+1 -120 11 50.00
20 NS 3S N = 600 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
a.8 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 52,88 %
21 NS 5C E-2 100 16 72.73
22 NS 4C S-2 -100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.7 Alexandre Viot -Pascale Ortegat 53,43 %
23 NS 1S N-3 -300 2 9.09
24 NS 3T N = 110 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
a.6 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 52,01 %
25 NS 3C E-3 300 21.9 99.55
26 NS 1S N+1 120 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 88,41 %
Total : 254,4 / 528 = 48,18 %
PAIRE A.8 Colette Heerinckx -Chantal de Lichtervelde
a.2 Michel Lievens -Jacques Podevyn 49,98 %
1 NS 3S N+1 430 8 36.36
2 NS 3S E+2 -460 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.1 Danielle Wybauw -Jeannine Thys 43,96 %
3 NS 2P W = -110 13 59.09
4 NS 3C N = 140 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a13 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 46,61 %
5 NS 3C E+1 -170 12 54.55
6 NS 4P N = 420 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a12 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Wanderpepen 48,60 %
7 NS 4C E+1 -650 10 45.45
8 NS 4C N = 420 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a11 Diane della Faille -Elie Behaghel 46,57 %
9 NS 3T S+1 130 7 31.82
10 NS 3S S+1 630 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a10 Didier Collart -Christian Meert 55,27 %
11 NS 2C S+1 140 16 72.73
12 NS 3T N+1 130 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
a.8 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 52,88 %
15 NS 4P N-1 -100 2 9.09
16 NS 3P N+1 170 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
a.7 Alexandre Viot -Pascale Ortegat 53,43 %
17 NS 3PcS-2 -300 1 4.55
18 NS 2P N+1 140 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
a.6 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 52,01 %
19 NS 2P W = -110 16 72.73
20 NS 3S N = 600 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 48,86 %
a.5 Helene Schyns -Dominique Sassen 48,50 %
21 NS 4C W-1 50 7 31.82
22 NS 4P W-1 100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a.4 Serge Alard -Myriam de Timary 46,72 %
23 NS 2C E = -110 11 50.00
24 NS 3CcE-2 300 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 49,55 %
25 NS 4P W = -620 4.5 20.45
26 NS 2S W-2 200 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 57,95 %
Total : 249,0 / 528 = 47,16 %
PAIRE A13 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont
a12 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Wanderpepen 48,60 %
1 NS 3S S+1 430 8 36.36
2 NS 3S E+3 -490 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a11 Diane della Faille -Elie Behaghel 46,57 %
3 NS 2P W+2 -170 3 13.64
4 NS 2S N-2 -200 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
a10 Didier Collart -Christian Meert 55,27 %
5 NS 2P W+2 -170 12 54.55
6 NS 4P N+2 480 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a.9 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 55,87 %
7 NS 4C W+1 -650 10 45.45
8 NS 4C N = 420 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.8 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 52,88 %
9 NS 2T S+2 130 7 31.82
10 NS 3S S+1 630 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.7 Alexandre Viot -Pascale Ortegat 53,43 %
11 NS 2C S = 110 11 50.00
12 NS 3T N+1 130 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.6 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 52,01 %
13 NS 1S E+3 -180 8 36.36
14 NS 4P S-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
a.5 Helene Schyns -Dominique Sassen 48,50 %
15 NS 3C W-1 50 8 36.36
16 NS 4P N+1 450 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.4 Serge Alard -Myriam de Timary 46,72 %
17 NS 3PcS-2 -300 1 4.55
18 NS 2P N+2 170 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 49,55 %
19 NS 3C E = -140 5 22.73
20 NS 3S N+2 660 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 61,14 %
a.2 Michel Lievens -Jacques Podevyn 49,98 %
21 NS 5KcS = 750 22 100.00
22 NS 5PcW-1 200 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
a13 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 46,61 %
25 NS 4P W = -620 4.5 20.45
26 NS 1S N-1 -100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 23,86 %
Total : 237,4 / 528 = 44,96 %
PAIRE A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Grazia Neuenschwander
a.1 Danielle Wybauw -Jeannine Thys 43,96 %
1 NS 5P S = 450 14 63.64
2 NS 3S E+2 -460 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
a13 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 46,61 %
3 NS 4C S-1 -50 17 77.27
4 NS 2S N-1 -100 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a12 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Wanderpepen 48,60 %
5 NS 3S W+1 -430 2 9.09
6 NS 4P N+1 450 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a11 Diane della Faille -Elie Behaghel 46,57 %
7 NS 4C W+2 -680 1 4.55
8 NS 4C N+1 450 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a10 Didier Collart -Christian Meert 55,27 %
9 NS 3T S+1 130 7 31.82
10 NS 2S S+1 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
a.9 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 55,87 %
11 NS 2C S = 110 11 50.00
12 NS 3T N = 110 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
a.8 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 52,88 %
13 NS 1S E+3 -180 8 36.36
14 NS 4P S = 420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.7 Alexandre Viot -Pascale Ortegat 53,43 %
15 NS 4C W-1 50 8 36.36
16 NS 6P N-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
a.6 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 52,01 %
17 NS 4K E-1 50 22 100.00
18 NS 4P N = 620 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 93,18 %
a.5 Helene Schyns -Dominique Sassen 48,50 %
19 NS 1S E+1 -120 11 50.00
20 NS 3S N+1 630 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a.4 Serge Alard -Myriam de Timary 46,72 %
21 NS 4C W-1 50 7 31.82
22 NS 4PcW+1 -990 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 49,55 %
23 NS 1S N-2 -200 7 31.82
24 NS 2S S+1 150 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
Total : 231,4 / 528 = 43,83 %
PAIRE A11 Efthalia Bogaerts -Claire Rolin
a.8 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 52,88 %
1 NS 6P N-1 -50 0 0.00
2 NS 3S E+3 -490 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
a.7 Alexandre Viot -Pascale Ortegat 53,43 %
3 NS 4C N = 420 22 100.00
4 NS 3C N = 140 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 93,18 %
a.6 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 52,01 %
5 NS 3S W = -400 7 31.82
6 NS 4P N+1 450 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.5 Helene Schyns -Dominique Sassen 48,50 %
7 NS 4C W+1 -650 10 45.45
8 NS 4C N = 420 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
a.4 Serge Alard -Myriam de Timary 46,72 %
9 NS 1S S+3 180 17 77.27
10 NS 3S S+1 630 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 49,55 %
11 NS 4C N-1 -50 6 27.27
12 NS 4C S-5 -500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
a.2 Michel Lievens -Jacques Podevyn 49,98 %
13 NS 1S E+3 -180 8 36.36
14 NS 4P S = 420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.1 Danielle Wybauw -Jeannine Thys 43,96 %
15 NS 4C W-1 50 8 36.36
16 NS 4P N = 420 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
a13 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 46,61 %
17 NS 2K E+1 -110 9 40.91
18 NS 2P N+2 170 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a11 Diane della Faille -Elie Behaghel 46,57 %
21 NS 4C W-1 50 7 31.82
22 NS 4PcW-1 200 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a10 Didier Collart -Christian Meert 55,27 %
23 NS 2T W+1 -110 11 50.00
24 NS 2S S-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a.9 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 55,87 %
25 NS 4P W = -620 4.5 20.45
26 NS 1S S-1 -100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 23,86 %
Total : 227,5 / 528 = 43,09 %
PAIRE A12 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere
a10 Didier Collart -Christian Meert 55,27 %
1 NS 3S N+1 430 8 36.36
2 NS 3S E+4 -520 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
a.9 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 55,87 %
3 NS 2P W+1 -140 9 40.91
4 NS 4C N-1 -100 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.8 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 52,88 %
5 NS 3S E+1 -430 2 9.09
6 NS 4P N+2 480 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.7 Alexandre Viot -Pascale Ortegat 53,43 %
7 NS 4C E+1 -650 10 45.45
8 NS 4C N-1 -50 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a.6 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 52,01 %
9 NS 3K N+1 130 7 31.82
10 NS 3S S = 600 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.5 Helene Schyns -Dominique Sassen 48,50 %
11 NS 2P W = -110 2 9.09
12 NS 4TxN = 920 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.4 Serge Alard -Myriam de Timary 46,72 %
13 NS 1S E+4 -210 0 0.00
14 NS 4P S+1 450 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 49,55 %
15 NS 4PcN-1 -200 0 0.00
16 NS 4P N+2 480 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
a.2 Michel Lievens -Jacques Podevyn 49,98 %
17 NS 3P S-3 -150 4 18.18
18 NS 3S S-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 9,09 %
a.1 Danielle Wybauw -Jeannine Thys 43,96 %
19 NS 1S E+1 -120 11 50.00
20 NS 3S N = 600 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
a12 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Wanderpepen 48,60 %
23 NS 1S N-1 -100 17 77.27
24 NS 2S S+2 180 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a11 Diane della Faille -Elie Behaghel 46,57 %
25 NS 4P W-1 100 19.7 89.55
26 NS 1K S-1 -100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 58,41 %
Total : 217,2 / 528 = 41,14 %
PAIRE A.6 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy
a11 Diane della Faille -Elie Behaghel 46,57 %
1 NS 3S N+1 430 8 36.36
2 NS 3S E+3 -490 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a10 Didier Collart -Christian Meert 55,27 %
3 NS 4C N-1 -50 17 77.27
4 NS 2S N-1 -100 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
a.9 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire 55,87 %
5 NS 2S E = -120 22 100.00
6 NS 4P N+1 450 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
a.8 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot 52,88 %
7 NS 4C W+1 -650 10 45.45
8 NS 4C N-1 -50 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
a.6 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve 52,01 %
11 NS 2P E-1 50 8 36.36
12 NS 5TcN-1 -200 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a.5 Helene Schyns -Dominique Sassen 48,50 %
13 NS 1S E+3 -180 8 36.36
14 NS 3P S+1 170 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.4 Serge Alard -Myriam de Timary 46,72 %
15 NS 4C W-2 100 17 77.27
16 NS 4P N+1 450 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger 49,55 %
17 NS 2K E+2 -130 6 27.27
18 NS 2P N+1 140 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a.2 Michel Lievens -Jacques Podevyn 49,98 %
19 NS 3C E+1 -170 0 0.00
20 NS 3S N-2 -200 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 0,23 %
a.1 Danielle Wybauw -Jeannine Thys 43,96 %
21 NS 4C E-1 50 7 31.82
22 NS 3PcW = -730 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 20,45 %
a13 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten 46,61 %
23 NS 1S N-1 -100 17 77.27
24 NS 2S S+1 150 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
a12 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Wanderpepen 48,60 %
25 NS 3P W+1 -170 15.4 70.00
26 NS 1S W = -90 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 57,73 %
Total : 206,5 / 528 = 39,11 %
PAIRE a.9 Alyona Pascaru -Marie J. de Wagheneire
A.5 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 67,69 %
1 EO 3S S+2 460 5 22.73
2 EO 3S E+2 -460 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A12 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 41,14 %
3 EO 2P W+1 -140 13 59.09
4 EO 4C N-1 -100 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.6 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy 39,11 %
5 EO 2S E = -120 0 0.00
6 EO 4P N+1 450 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A13 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 44,96 %
7 EO 4C W+1 -650 12 54.55
8 EO 4C N = 420 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 56,99 %
9 EO 3T S+1 130 15 68.18
10 EO 3S S = 600 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Grazia Neuenschwander 43,83 %
11 EO 2C S = 110 11 50.00
12 EO 3T N = 110 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Giuseppe Napoli 54,66 %
15 EO 5C W-2 100 5 22.73
16 EO 4P N+1 450 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A.9 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 61,34 %
17 EO 3P S-1 -50 2 9.09
18 EO 2P N+1 140 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A.3 Francoise Turin -Sylviane Delbeke 48,18 %
19 EO 1S E+1 -120 11 50.00
20 EO 3S N = 600 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
A10 Simone Munsterhjelm -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,03 %
21 EO 3C W = -140 22 100.00
22 EO 4P W = -620 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
A.4 Patricia Bardy -Michele Berrier 50,72 %
23 EO 1S N-3 -300 20 90.91
24 EO 2S S+1 150 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A11 Efthalia Bogaerts -Claire Rolin 43,09 %
25 EO 4P W = -620 17.5 79.55
26 EO 1S S-1 -100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 76,14 %
Total : 295,0 / 528 = 55,87 %
PAIRE a10 Didier Collart -Christian Meert
A12 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 41,14 %
1 EO 3S N+1 430 14 63.64
2 EO 3S E+4 -520 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
A.6 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy 39,11 %
3 EO 4C N-1 -50 5 22.73
4 EO 2S N-1 -100 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A13 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 44,96 %
5 EO 2P W+2 -170 10 45.45
6 EO 4P N+2 480 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 56,99 %
7 EO 4C W+1 -650 12 54.55
8 EO 4C N-1 -50 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Grazia Neuenschwander 43,83 %
9 EO 3T S+1 130 15 68.18
10 EO 2S S+1 150 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
A.8 Colette Heerinckx -Chantal de Lichtervelde 47,16 %
11 EO 2C S+1 140 6 27.27
12 EO 3T N+1 130 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Giuseppe Napoli 54,66 %
13 EO 2C E+2 -170 5 22.73
14 EO 4P S = 420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.3 Francoise Turin -Sylviane Delbeke 48,18 %
17 EO 3P S-2 -100 7 31.82
18 EO 2P N+1 140 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A10 Simone Munsterhjelm -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,03 %
19 EO 2P E+1 -140 17 77.27
20 EO 60%40% Ajust 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 58,64 %
A.4 Patricia Bardy -Michele Berrier 50,72 %
21 EO 5T E-2 100 6 27.27
22 EO 4PcW-1 200 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A11 Efthalia Bogaerts -Claire Rolin 43,09 %
23 EO 2T W+1 -110 11 50.00
24 EO 2S S-2 -100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A.5 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 67,69 %
25 EO 2P W+3 -200 11 50.00
26 EO 2P W = -110 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
Total : 291,8 / 528 = 55,27 %
PAIRE a.7 Alexandre Viot -Pascale Ortegat
A.4 Patricia Bardy -Michele Berrier 50,72 %
1 EO 3S S+2 460 5 22.73
2 EO 3S E+2 -460 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A11 Efthalia Bogaerts -Claire Rolin 43,09 %
3 EO 4C N = 420 0 0.00
4 EO 3C N = 140 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 6,82 %
A.5 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 67,69 %
5 EO 3C E+1 -170 10 45.45
6 EO 4P N+1 450 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A12 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 41,14 %
7 EO 4C E+1 -650 12 54.55
8 EO 4C N-1 -50 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A13 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 44,96 %
11 EO 2C S = 110 11 50.00
12 EO 3T N+1 130 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 56,99 %
13 EO 1S E+3 -180 14 63.64
14 EO 3S N+1 430 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Grazia Neuenschwander 43,83 %
15 EO 4C W-1 50 14 63.64
16 EO 6P N-2 -100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
A.8 Colette Heerinckx -Chantal de Lichtervelde 47,16 %
17 EO 3PcS-2 -300 21 95.45
18 EO 2P N+1 140 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Giuseppe Napoli 54,66 %
19 EO 2T W = -90 4 18.18
20 EO 3S N+1 630 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 24,09 %
A.9 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 61,34 %
21 EO 4CcW-1 100 6 27.27
22 EO 4PcW-1 200 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A.3 Francoise Turin -Sylviane Delbeke 48,18 %
23 EO 1S N-3 -300 20 90.91
24 EO 3T N = 110 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
A10 Simone Munsterhjelm -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,03 %
25 EO 4P W = -620 17.5 79.55
26 EO 1S S-2 -200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 89,77 %
Total : 282,1 / 528 = 53,43 %
PAIRE a.8 Claire de Quirini -Aida Zumot
A11 Efthalia Bogaerts -Claire Rolin 43,09 %
1 EO 6P N-1 -50 22 100.00
2 EO 3S E+3 -490 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
A.5 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 67,69 %
3 EO 2P W = -110 9 40.91
4 EO 3C N = 140 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A12 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 41,14 %
5 EO 3S E+1 -430 20 90.91
6 EO 4P N+2 480 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.6 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy 39,11 %
7 EO 4C W+1 -650 12 54.55
8 EO 4C N-1 -50 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A13 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 44,96 %
9 EO 2T S+2 130 15 68.18
10 EO 3S S+1 630 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Grazia Neuenschwander 43,83 %
13 EO 1S E+3 -180 14 63.64
14 EO 4P S = 420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.8 Colette Heerinckx -Chantal de Lichtervelde 47,16 %
15 EO 4P N-1 -100 20 90.91
16 EO 3P N+1 170 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Giuseppe Napoli 54,66 %
17 EO 3P S-2 -100 7 31.82
18 EO 2P N+2 170 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.9 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 61,34 %
19 EO 2S E = -120 11 50.00
20 EO 3S N+1 630 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A.3 Francoise Turin -Sylviane Delbeke 48,18 %
21 EO 5C E-2 100 6 27.27
22 EO 4C S-2 -100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A10 Simone Munsterhjelm -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,03 %
23 EO 1S N-2 -200 15 68.18
24 EO 2S S+1 150 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A.4 Patricia Bardy -Michele Berrier 50,72 %
25 EO 3P W+1 -170 6.6 30.00
26 EO 1S W-2 200 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 17,27 %
Total : 279,2 / 528 = 52,88 %
PAIRE a.6 Olivier Paternostre -Nicolas de Neve
A10 Simone Munsterhjelm -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,03 %
1 EO 3S N+1 430 14 63.64
2 EO 4P E = -420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.4 Patricia Bardy -Michele Berrier 50,72 %
3 EO 2P W+2 -170 19 86.36
4 EO 2S N-1 -100 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A11 Efthalia Bogaerts -Claire Rolin 43,09 %
5 EO 3S W = -400 15 68.18
6 EO 4P N+1 450 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A12 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 41,14 %
9 EO 3K N+1 130 15 68.18
10 EO 3S S = 600 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.6 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy 39,11 %
11 EO 2P E-1 50 14 63.64
12 EO 5TcN-1 -200 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A13 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 44,96 %
13 EO 1S E+3 -180 14 63.64
14 EO 4P S-1 -50 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 56,99 %
15 EO 5C W-2 100 5 22.73
16 EO 4P N+2 480 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Grazia Neuenschwander 43,83 %
17 EO 4K E-1 50 0 0.00
18 EO 4P N = 620 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 6,82 %
A.8 Colette Heerinckx -Chantal de Lichtervelde 47,16 %
19 EO 2P W = -110 6 27.27
20 EO 3S N = 600 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 51,14 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Giuseppe Napoli 54,66 %
21 EO 3C W-1 50 15 68.18
22 EO 4C S-1 -50 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A.9 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 61,34 %
23 EO 1S N-3 -300 20 90.91
24 EO 2S S+1 150 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A.3 Francoise Turin -Sylviane Delbeke 48,18 %
25 EO 3C E-3 300 0.1 0.45
26 EO 1S N+1 120 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 11,59 %
Total : 274,6 / 528 = 52,01 %
PAIRE a.2 Michel Lievens -Jacques Podevyn
A.8 Colette Heerinckx -Chantal de Lichtervelde 47,16 %
1 EO 3S N+1 430 14 63.64
2 EO 3S E+2 -460 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Giuseppe Napoli 54,66 %
3 EO 2P W+2 -170 19 86.36
4 EO 4C N-3 -300 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 93,18 %
A.9 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 61,34 %
5 EO 2C E+1 -140 4 18.18
6 EO 2P N+3 200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A.3 Francoise Turin -Sylviane Delbeke 48,18 %
7 EO 3S W+1 -630 2 9.09
8 EO 4C N = 420 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A10 Simone Munsterhjelm -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,03 %
9 EO 2P W-2 200 1 4.55
10 EO 3S S+1 630 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
A.4 Patricia Bardy -Michele Berrier 50,72 %
11 EO 2C S+2 170 1 4.55
12 EO 3S N-2 -200 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A11 Efthalia Bogaerts -Claire Rolin 43,09 %
13 EO 1S E+3 -180 14 63.64
14 EO 4P S = 420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.5 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 67,69 %
15 EO 5CcW-3 500 0 0.00
16 EO 6P N-1 -50 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A12 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 41,14 %
17 EO 3P S-3 -150 18 81.82
18 EO 3S S-1 -100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,91 %
A.6 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy 39,11 %
19 EO 3C E+1 -170 22 100.00
20 EO 3S N-2 -200 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 99,77 %
A13 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 44,96 %
21 EO 5KcS = 750 0 0.00
22 EO 5PcW-1 200 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 56,99 %
23 EO 1S N-1 -100 5 22.73
24 EO 3S S = 400 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
Total : 263,9 / 528 = 49,98 %
PAIRE a.3 Clarence Steininger -Marie Fr. Steininger
A.9 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 61,34 %
3 EO 3C S+1 170 2 9.09
4 EO 4C S-1 -100 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.3 Francoise Turin -Sylviane Delbeke 48,18 %
5 EO 3S W = -400 15 68.18
6 EO 4P N+1 450 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A10 Simone Munsterhjelm -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,03 %
7 EO 3S W+1 -630 2 9.09
8 EO 4C N+1 450 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 6,82 %
A.4 Patricia Bardy -Michele Berrier 50,72 %
9 EO 2P W-1 100 22 100.00
10 EO 3S S = 600 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
A11 Efthalia Bogaerts -Claire Rolin 43,09 %
11 EO 4C N-1 -50 16 72.73
12 EO 4C S-5 -500 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
A.5 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 67,69 %
13 EO 1S E+2 -150 1 4.55
14 EO 4P S = 420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A12 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 41,14 %
15 EO 4PcN-1 -200 22 100.00
16 EO 4P N+2 480 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.6 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy 39,11 %
17 EO 2K E+2 -130 16 72.73
18 EO 2P N+1 140 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A13 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 44,96 %
19 EO 3C E = -140 17 77.27
20 EO 3S N+2 660 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 38,86 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 56,99 %
21 EO 3S E-6 300 2 9.09
22 EO 4PcW-1 200 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Grazia Neuenschwander 43,83 %
23 EO 1S N-2 -200 15 68.18
24 EO 2S S+1 150 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 65,91 %
A.8 Colette Heerinckx -Chantal de Lichtervelde 47,16 %
25 EO 4P W = -620 17.5 79.55
26 EO 2S W-2 200 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 42,05 %
Total : 261,6 / 528 = 49,55 %
PAIRE a12 Liliane Baptista -Jeannine Wanderpepen
A13 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 44,96 %
1 EO 3S S+1 430 14 63.64
2 EO 3S E+3 -490 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 56,99 %
3 EO 3P W+1 -170 19 86.36
4 EO 3C N = 140 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Grazia Neuenschwander 43,83 %
5 EO 3S W+1 -430 20 90.91
6 EO 4P N+1 450 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A.8 Colette Heerinckx -Chantal de Lichtervelde 47,16 %
7 EO 4C E+1 -650 12 54.55
8 EO 4C N = 420 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Giuseppe Napoli 54,66 %
9 EO 3K N+2 150 8 36.36
10 EO 3S S = 600 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 56,82 %
A.9 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 61,34 %
11 EO 2C S+2 170 1 4.55
12 EO 3S N+1 630 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 11,36 %
A.3 Francoise Turin -Sylviane Delbeke 48,18 %
13 EO 1S E+3 -180 14 63.64
14 EO 3S N = 400 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A10 Simone Munsterhjelm -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,03 %
15 EO 4C W-1 50 14 63.64
16 EO 4P N = 420 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A.4 Patricia Bardy -Michele Berrier 50,72 %
17 EO 3P S-2 -100 7 31.82
18 EO 4P N = 620 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A.5 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 67,69 %
21 EO 4C W-1 50 15 68.18
22 EO 4PcW-1 200 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A12 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 41,14 %
23 EO 1S N-1 -100 5 22.73
24 EO 2S S+2 180 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A.6 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy 39,11 %
25 EO 3P W+1 -170 6.6 30.00
26 EO 1S W = -90 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 42,27 %
Total : 256,6 / 528 = 48,60 %
PAIRE a.5 Helene Schyns -Dominique Sassen
A.3 Francoise Turin -Sylviane Delbeke 48,18 %
1 EO 3S S = 400 20 90.91
2 EO 3S E+2 -460 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A10 Simone Munsterhjelm -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,03 %
3 EO 2P W+1 -140 13 59.09
4 EO 3C N-1 -100 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A11 Efthalia Bogaerts -Claire Rolin 43,09 %
7 EO 4C W+1 -650 12 54.55
8 EO 4C N = 420 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.5 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 67,69 %
9 EO 1S S+3 180 5 22.73
10 EO 3S S+1 630 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A12 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 41,14 %
11 EO 2P W = -110 20 90.91
12 EO 4TxN = 920 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.6 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy 39,11 %
13 EO 1S E+3 -180 14 63.64
14 EO 3P S+1 170 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A13 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 44,96 %
15 EO 3C W-1 50 14 63.64
16 EO 4P N+1 450 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 56,99 %
17 EO 3K E = -110 13 59.09
18 EO 3S S+2 660 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Grazia Neuenschwander 43,83 %
19 EO 1S E+1 -120 11 50.00
20 EO 3S N+1 630 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A.8 Colette Heerinckx -Chantal de Lichtervelde 47,16 %
21 EO 4C W-1 50 15 68.18
22 EO 4P W-1 100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Giuseppe Napoli 54,66 %
23 EO 1S N-1 -100 5 22.73
24 EO 2S S+2 180 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A.9 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 61,34 %
25 EO 4P W = -620 17.5 79.55
26 EO 1S N = 90 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 60,23 %
Total : 256,1 / 528 = 48,50 %
PAIRE a.4 Serge Alard -Myriam de Timary
A.9 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 61,34 %
1 EO 3S S+3 490 0 0.00
2 EO 3S E+2 -460 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
A10 Simone Munsterhjelm -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,03 %
5 EO 2C E+1 -140 4 18.18
6 EO 4P N+1 450 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 38,64 %
A.4 Patricia Bardy -Michele Berrier 50,72 %
7 EO 4C E+2 -680 21 95.45
8 EO 4C N = 420 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A11 Efthalia Bogaerts -Claire Rolin 43,09 %
9 EO 1S S+3 180 5 22.73
10 EO 3S S+1 630 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A.5 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 67,69 %
11 EO 2C S+1 140 6 27.27
12 EO 3S S+1 630 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A12 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 41,14 %
13 EO 1S E+4 -210 22 100.00
14 EO 4P S+1 450 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.6 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy 39,11 %
15 EO 4C W-2 100 5 22.73
16 EO 4P N+1 450 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A13 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 44,96 %
17 EO 3PcS-2 -300 21 95.45
18 EO 2P N+2 170 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 56,99 %
19 EO 1S E+2 -150 20 90.91
20 EO 3S N = 600 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 82,95 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Grazia Neuenschwander 43,83 %
21 EO 4C W-1 50 15 68.18
22 EO 4PcW+1 -990 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 84,09 %
A.8 Colette Heerinckx -Chantal de Lichtervelde 47,16 %
23 EO 2C E = -110 11 50.00
24 EO 3CcE-2 300 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Giuseppe Napoli 54,66 %
25 EO 60%60% Ajust 13.2 60.00
26 EO 1S S+1 120 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 41,36 %
Total : 246,7 / 528 = 46,72 %
PAIRE a13 Paul Henricot -Marguerite Verstraeten
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 56,99 %
1 EO 4P S+2 480 2 9.09
2 EO 3S E+3 -490 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Grazia Neuenschwander 43,83 %
3 EO 4C S-1 -50 5 22.73
4 EO 2S N-1 -100 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
A.8 Colette Heerinckx -Chantal de Lichtervelde 47,16 %
5 EO 3C E+1 -170 10 45.45
6 EO 4P N = 420 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Giuseppe Napoli 54,66 %
7 EO 3S E+1 -630 2 9.09
8 EO 3S N-1 -50 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.9 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 61,34 %
9 EO 3P W-2 200 1 4.55
10 EO 3S S+1 630 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
A.3 Francoise Turin -Sylviane Delbeke 48,18 %
11 EO 1P W+1 -110 20 90.91
12 EO 3S N+1 630 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A10 Simone Munsterhjelm -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,03 %
13 EO 1S E+2 -150 1 4.55
14 EO 4P S = 420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A.4 Patricia Bardy -Michele Berrier 50,72 %
15 EO 4C W-1 50 14 63.64
16 EO 6P N-1 -50 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A11 Efthalia Bogaerts -Claire Rolin 43,09 %
17 EO 2K E+1 -110 13 59.09
18 EO 2P N+2 170 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.5 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 67,69 %
19 EO 2P W-1 100 1 4.55
20 EO 3S N+1 630 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 17,27 %
A.6 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy 39,11 %
23 EO 1S N-1 -100 5 22.73
24 EO 2S S+1 150 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 43,18 %
A13 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 44,96 %
25 EO 4P W = -620 17.5 79.55
26 EO 1S N-1 -100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 76,14 %
Total : 246,1 / 528 = 46,61 %
PAIRE a11 Diane della Faille -Elie Behaghel
A.6 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy 39,11 %
1 EO 3S N+1 430 14 63.64
2 EO 3S E+3 -490 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 70,45 %
A13 Chris Oostens -Marie Morimont 44,96 %
3 EO 2P W+2 -170 19 86.36
4 EO 2S N-2 -200 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 88,64 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 56,99 %
5 EO 3S W+1 -430 20 90.91
6 EO 4P N+2 480 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 52,27 %
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Grazia Neuenschwander 43,83 %
7 EO 4C W+2 -680 21 95.45
8 EO 4C N+1 450 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.8 Colette Heerinckx -Chantal de Lichtervelde 47,16 %
9 EO 3T S+1 130 15 68.18
10 EO 3S S+1 630 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Giuseppe Napoli 54,66 %
11 EO 2P W = -110 20 90.91
12 EO 3K W = -110 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
A.9 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 61,34 %
13 EO 2P W+2 -170 5 22.73
14 EO 4P S = 420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.3 Francoise Turin -Sylviane Delbeke 48,18 %
15 EO 5C W-2 100 5 22.73
16 EO 4P N+1 450 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A.4 Patricia Bardy -Michele Berrier 50,72 %
19 EO 2T W-1 100 1 4.55
20 EO 3S N+1 630 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 17,27 %
A11 Efthalia Bogaerts -Claire Rolin 43,09 %
21 EO 4C W-1 50 15 68.18
22 EO 4PcW-1 200 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.5 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 67,69 %
23 EO 2T E-1 100 0 0.00
24 EO 3S S = 400 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 2,27 %
A12 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 41,14 %
25 EO 4P W-1 100 2.3 10.45
26 EO 1K S-1 -100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 41,59 %
Total : 245,9 / 528 = 46,57 %
PAIRE a.1 Danielle Wybauw -Jeannine Thys
A.1 Eliane de Ceuninck -Grazia Neuenschwander 43,83 %
1 EO 5P S = 450 8 36.36
2 EO 3S E+2 -460 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 34,09 %
A.8 Colette Heerinckx -Chantal de Lichtervelde 47,16 %
3 EO 2P W = -110 9 40.91
4 EO 3C N = 140 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A.2 Lydia Wildiers -Giuseppe Napoli 54,66 %
5 EO 2C E+1 -140 4 18.18
6 EO 4P N+2 480 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 15,91 %
A.9 Philippe van der Gracht -Patrick Gilles 61,34 %
7 EO 4C W+1 -650 12 54.55
8 EO 4C N = 420 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A.3 Francoise Turin -Sylviane Delbeke 48,18 %
9 EO 3K N+1 130 15 68.18
10 EO 3S S+1 630 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 47,73 %
A10 Simone Munsterhjelm -Antoinette van Hoobrouck 52,03 %
11 EO 2C S+1 140 6 27.27
12 EO 4PcW-3 500 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.4 Patricia Bardy -Michele Berrier 50,72 %
13 EO 1S E+3 -180 14 63.64
14 EO 4P S = 420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A11 Efthalia Bogaerts -Claire Rolin 43,09 %
15 EO 4C W-1 50 14 63.64
16 EO 4P N = 420 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 61,36 %
A.5 Mercedes Steed -Charlotte de Wasseige 67,69 %
17 EO 3P S-2 -100 7 31.82
18 EO 3S S = 600 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 29,55 %
A12 Annette Fobe -Nicole Leclere 41,14 %
19 EO 1S E+1 -120 11 50.00
20 EO 3S N = 600 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
A.6 Chantal de Locht -Marc Antoine de Halloy 39,11 %
21 EO 4C E-1 50 15 68.18
22 EO 3PcW = -730 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 79,55 %
A.7 Elena Valsesia -Sylvette Kahaleh 56,99 %
25 EO 3P W+1 -170 6.6 30.00
26 EO 1S S = 90 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 35,45 %
Total : 232,1 / 528 = 43,96 %
|